<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Fashion Police: This Post is a Threat to Security - Consumerist Comments]]></title>
		
	    	<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:11:59 EDT]]></lastBuildDate>
	    	<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:11:59 EDT]]></pubDate>
		<link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/dangerous-shirt/fashion-police-this-post-is-a-threat-to-security-201060.php]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Fashion Police: This Post is a Threat to Security]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/dangerous-shirt/fashion-police-this-post-is-a-threat-to-security-201060.php#c435714]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Chill out, Daryl. Go wash your Camaro or something...</p> <p><a href="http://hotgreenpeas.com">ikes</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[ikes]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:201060:c435714]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:11:59 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Fashion Police: This Post is a Threat to Security]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/dangerous-shirt/fashion-police-this-post-is-a-threat-to-security-201060.php#c434830]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Guns n' Roses is (was) the greatest band in the world.  That douche is wearing a Guns n' Rollers shirt, whatever the fuck that is.  So, he deserves all the hassle he got for such blasphemy.</p> <p>Daryl</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daryl]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:201060:c434830]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:00:51 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Fashion Police: This Post is a Threat to Security]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/dangerous-shirt/fashion-police-this-post-is-a-threat-to-security-201060.php#c434451]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
I'm going to have to agree with Thwarted here. Smack that baby on a (Cafepress even) shirt.<br />
</p> <p>Xkeeper</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xkeeper]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:201060:c434451]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 19 Sep 2006 04:45:46 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Fashion Police: This Post is a Threat to Security]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/dangerous-shirt/fashion-police-this-post-is-a-threat-to-security-201060.php#c433046]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Your only safe bet is to wear <a href="http://www.islamicashop.com/images/big/93.jpg">this shirt</a>.</p> <p><a href="http://spinachdip.blogspot.com">spinachdip</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[spinachdip]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:201060:c433046]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:55:28 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Fashion Police: This Post is a Threat to Security]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/dangerous-shirt/fashion-police-this-post-is-a-threat-to-security-201060.php#c432908]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Antediluvian: Oooh, I like it. Someone slap that on a Consumerist shirt.</p> <p>thwarted</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[thwarted]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:201060:c432908]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:24:25 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Fashion Police: This Post is a Threat to Security]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/dangerous-shirt/fashion-police-this-post-is-a-threat-to-security-201060.php#c432796]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
How about a t-shirt that says <br />
<b>"The TSA confiscated my K-Y but let me keep this shirt"</b><br />
</p> <p>Antediluvian</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antediluvian]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:201060:c432796]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:52:04 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Fashion Police: This Post is a Threat to Security]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/dangerous-shirt/fashion-police-this-post-is-a-threat-to-security-201060.php#c432786]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
Amazingly a high percentage of the folks applying for the screener jobs back in 2002 were former law enforcement officers and ex-military.  I worked in one of the processing centers in NYC where a lot of retiring NYPD were applying.  Now most of them were retiring because the retirement system rewarded them for the high wages they earned in 2001/2002 on terrorist duties.  I'm sure most of those have moved to higher level positions in TSA now or somewhere else in government.  </p>
<p>
Very few of those who worked for the previous regime passed the screening tests.  I don't know about the waivers for high school graduation.  It's better than it was .... still inadequate, but a step forward.  </p> <p>RandomHookup</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[RandomHookup]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:201060:c432786]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:49:06 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Fashion Police: This Post is a Threat to Security]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/dangerous-shirt/fashion-police-this-post-is-a-threat-to-security-201060.php#c432724]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
The screeners making the enforcement decisions are still the same ignorant dirtbags that were making the mistakes 5 years ago.  Some still were grandfathered in and didn't have to have a GED yet.</p>
<p>
These aren't smart people, if they were, they would be real police.  As of now, they are just extremely low level screeners.  The low of the low.</p> <p>Magister</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magister]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:201060:c432724]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:35:13 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Fashion Police: This Post is a Threat to Security]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/dangerous-shirt/fashion-police-this-post-is-a-threat-to-security-201060.php#c432498]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
was deemed what?</p> <p><a href="http://bonjourpeewee.bogspot.com">Bon Jour, Pee Wee</a></p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bon Jour, Pee Wee]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:201060:c432498]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:48:04 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		    <title><![CDATA[Fashion Police: This Post is a Threat to Security]]></title>
		    <link><![CDATA[http://consumerist.com/consumer/dangerous-shirt/fashion-police-this-post-is-a-threat-to-security-201060.php#c432401]]></link>
										
		    <description><![CDATA[<p>
This is really sad. So much for that whole land of the free thing. Although I guess that's never really been true, you know with all the puritan laws and that hole nasty slavery bit.</p> <p>Hooray4Zoidberg</p>]]></description>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hooray4Zoidberg]]></dc:creator>
		    <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[31:201060:c432401]]></guid>
		    <pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:30:29 EDT]]></pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>