<![CDATA[Consumerist: US Airways]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: US Airways]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/us airways http://consumerist.com/tag/us airways <![CDATA[ US Airways Loses Your 83-Year-Old Mother ]]> It's bad enough when they lose your luggage, but what do you do when the airline loses your 83-year-old mother? File a claim? Poor Vera Kuemmel had to answer this very question as she waited in vain at the baggage claim of the Tampa airport.

From 10Connects:

Wheelchair-bound Elfride Kuemmel was on her way back home to Tampa Monday when a US Airways employee wheeled her on to the wrong connecting flight.

The 83-year-old wound up in Puerto Rico, where she was initially told she'd have to spend the night at the airport.

Vera, of course, objected to this idea.

"I was upset, and I told them there was no way they were going to leave her in the airport all night waiting to leave on a flight at 3:30 in the afternoon," she told the local news.

US Airways ended up buying Elfride dinner, a hotel room, and a flight back to Florida. First class.

Elderly Tampa woman ''lost'' by US Airways [10Connects]

]]>
Consumerist-5093466 Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:49:37 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5093466&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ US Airways To Charge $7 For Pillows And Blankets ]]> US Airways is planning on copying JetBlue and start charging $7 for pillows and blankets. This is how we're going to save the airline industry, with fees for not being cold? No wonder they're in a tail-spin. [NYT] (Photo: Presidente)

]]>
Consumerist-5075829 Tue, 04 Nov 2008 09:01:25 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5075829&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ US Airways Saving Money Because Nobody Is Buying Their Drinks? ]]> US Airways says that their decision to start charging for water, coffee and soft drinks is working — because no one is buying them.

The attendants, who initially opposed the program, would "riot" if the airline tried to return to the old system of free nonalcoholic beverages, President Scott Kirby said Thursday at a Calyon Securities conference in New York.

"Logjams in the aisles, significant trash collection, lines at the restrooms — all those things are largely gone on US Airways because fewer people are buying and drinking sodas," he said. "We spend less money, we generate a little revenue, and those problems are largely gone."

The spokesperson for the flight attendants in question thinks Scott Kirby is full of you know what:

"Kirby's comment that we would riot is just his way of telling himself they made the right decision," said Mike Flores, president of the Assn. of Flight Attendants-CWA at US Airways.

"This is the very tip of the iceberg on what they're going to want us to sell," Flores said. "It's going to be everything from pillows and blankets to cellphone chargers."

Fun.


US Airways sees benefits of charging for drinks
[LA Times]
(Photo: Jenna Belle )

]]>
Consumerist-5052428 Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:20:22 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5052428&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ U.S. Airways: Abandoning Passengers "Is Not A Compensation Issue" ]]> Remember the 274 passengers stranded by U.S. Airways in Punta Cana? According to the airline, compensating those passengers would be unsafe. Seriously, that's their argument:
"In order to ensure that all carriers remain focused on safety, aviation regulations do not require airlines to pay compensation for consequential expenses because of delayed or canceled flights."

Come on, U.S. Air, at least make up interesting bullshit. Compensating passengers could resurrect mighty Rodan, whose insatiable hunger for man-blood would imperil plump business-class passengers. Stuff like that.

Here's the rest of their letter:

I sincerely apologize for the inconvenience you experienced when Flight 1860 was cancelled due to Air Traffic Control. You have every right to expect our flights to operate as scheduled. We certainly don’t intend to cause difficulties for our customers and realize that any service failure, even when the cancellation is mandated by Air Traffic Control, creates a negative impression of our company.

All airlines must adhere to the instructions given by the airport’s traffic tower. We realize the cancellation of your flight was a frustrating situation; however, the flight was cancelled in conjunction with airport conditions and information from the airport tower.

Deteriorated weather conditions made flying to Philadelphia an impossibility. It became apparent an improvement in this situation was not going to happen. Safety considerations are paramount to all concerned and override flight schedules. We realize this was a frustrating situation; however, the flight was cancelled for safety reasons.

In order to ensure that all carriers remain focused on safety, aviation regulations do not require airlines to pay compensation for consequential expenses because of delayed or canceled flights. This would include such items as hotel expenses, telephone calls, lost wages, missed meetings and other personal expenses including purchasing alternate transportation.

I’m sincerely sorry for the difficulties and the inconvenience you experienced on this trip. Regretfully, per policy and guidelines this is not a compensation issue.

Technically, U.S. Airways is correct in that neither the contract of carriage nor federal regulations compel the airline to offer anything, including an apology letter. Still, as travel-meister Chris Elliot points out, "the federal government doesn't force us" isn't good enough.

...common sense tells you it should do something, even if it means sending them a couple of hundred bucks in vouchers that will be impossible to redeem (or that the passengers will refuse to redeem). But “this is not a compensation issue” is unacceptable.

So what would the right response look like? Could any airline offer a response we'd find acceptable? Compare U.S. Airways' response to Southwest's classy handling of a 2-hour delayed flight.

US Airways to Dominican flight victims: “This is not a compensation issue” [Tripso]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-5043958 Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:00:26 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5043958&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Top 3 Most and Least "Fee Crazy" Airlines ]]> Airline fees are a controversial topic these days, so we look a look at the fees that airlines were charging and picked the top 3 most and least "fee crazy" airlines. Avoiding fees is hard, so why not try to avoid the airlines that charge them instead?



Most Fee Crazy Airlines:


  1. U.S. Airways: Not only does U.S. Airways have the distinction of being the only US airline to charge for water, they were also the first to discontinue free snacks. They've also decided to do away with in-flight entertainment. So what will you think about while you're bored, hungry and thirsty? How about that $15 first checked bag fee, the $25 second checked bag fee, the $5-30$ fee to choose your favorite economy class seat, and the whopping $250 fee you paid to change your ticket. Oh, yeah, and remember when they made everyone crazy by charging a $5 fee to book a ticket... with their own website?
  2. United Airlines: United is following U.S. Airways lead with a combination of cutting amenities and introducing fees. They've done away with snacks and are selling "snack boxes." Soon, United will be raising the prices for these items and economy class passengers will be expected to pay $9 for a sandwich. While you're munching on that overpriced nonsense, you can add up the following fees: $15 to check your first bag, $25 for the second bag, and $125 for the third. Then there's the $25 you paid to book your ticket over the phone, the $125 you paid for the privilege of traveling with your pet in the cabin, and of course, the $349 per year that you pay to be able to "stretch out and relax in comfort in seats located at the front of the Economy section,".."if available."
  3. (tie) Delta Airlines & American Airlines: American was the first airline to charge for the 1st checked bag, and Delta has managed to resist that fee — but Delta's other fees are just so darn expensive that we had to call this one a tie. Ultimately, it costs more to check two bags with Delta than it does with U.S. Airways, United, or American. American currently charges $15 for the first bag, $25 for the second, and from $3-6 for snacks. Delta charges nothing for the first checked bag, but if you're thinking of checking two bags, get ready to pay $50 for the second bag, and $125 for the third bag. Ouch! Delta's snacks are complimentary, but they charge from $1-10 more for certain special items.


Least Fee Crazy Airlines:


  1. Southwest Airlines: Southwest is the only major airline that isn't charging a fee to check two bags, and the third checked bag will only cost you $25. There is also no fee to change your ticket. Instead, you'll get a flight credit that is good for one year. They don't charge a fee to book over the phone or in person, and they don't charge a fee for an unaccompanied minor.
  2. AirTran: AirTran has fees but they're lower than a lot of its competitors. For example, the 2nd checked bag is $10 and the third is $50. The ticket change fee is $75, and unaccompanied minors will only cost you $39, as opposed to $100 on Delta, United, etc. You will pay $6 for an advanced seat assignment and $20 to sit in an exit row.
  3. JetBlue: JetBlue keeps threatening to go over to the dark side with new charges for things that used to be free (headsets $1, blankets and pillows $7) but they still have some of the more reasonable fees in the industry. There is no charge for the first checked back, and the second bag will cost you $20. Changing your ticket will cost you $100, and expect to pay from $10-20 more for their mini-business class "extra legroom" seats. Snacks and non-alcoholic beverages are plentiful and free, however. Love those blue potato chips.

If you're looking for an easy way to compare fees, check out this excellent PDF from the folks at SmarterTravel.com, Airfarewatchdog.com, and SeatGuru.com.

(Photo: Jenna Belle )

]]>
Consumerist-5042052 Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:30:50 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5042052&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 4 New Airline Fees And How To Get Around Them ]]> Travel expert to the stars Christopher Elliott has a new column that explains 4 new or grotesquely inflated airline fees and some ways to get around them...

The fees are:

1) Beverages— Bring an empty water bottle and hit the drinking fountain.

2) Checked luggage— Avoid certain stupid airlines or become a carry-on ninja.

3) Award tickets— Fuel surcharges are making award tickets suck. Cash in your miles, or use your awards for something else.

4) Unaccompanied minors— Avoid airlines with insane fees or fly with your kid. At these rates, it might be worth it.

In depth explanations and more specific advice on how to get around these fees is given here, but we liked this way the best:

Of course, the best way around all of these fees is to fly on an airline that doesn't have them. Southwest Airlines still allows you to check two bags at no extra charge. JetBlue still serves free drinks and snacks and charges $25 less than the big airlines for unaccompanied minors. Supporting these less fee-prone companies will hasten the inevitable demise of the airlines that erroneously believe they can surcharge their way back to a profit.


Four new airline fees — and how to avoid them
[CNN] (Thanks, j!)
(Photo: hellochris )

]]>
Consumerist-5034000 Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:46:36 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5034000&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Poll: Is It Immoral For US Airways To Charge For Drinking Water? ]]> Between the TSA ban on liquids and US Airways $2 fee for bottled water, if you want a drink, you're probably going to pay for it. It may be annoying, but is it also wrong?

According to US Airways policy, coffee and tea are $1, but bottled drinking water is $2. So, can you order tea and ask them to "hold the tea" and save a $1? Shouldn't you be able to get a boring old glass of water for free?

Jeanne Leblanc from the Hartford Courant thinks so:

It's hard to understand why the laws that require free potable water in such public places as movie theaters and amusement parks don't seem to apply to airlines. But then, it shouldn't have to be a law. It should just be a matter of common decency.
...
Now, I'm not saying US Airways should have to hand out free bottles of water, although that would be nice. I'm saying it should pour a cup of water out of a quart bottle for any passenger who's thirsty. And for no other reason than that they're thirsty.

US Airways says that if you're "desperately thirsty" and you don't have any money, they might give you some water... so that you don't try anything embarrassing like drinking out of the bathroom sinks.

“Frankly, [drinking from the sink is] just not classy,” a US Airways spokesperson told the Wall Street Journal.

So what do you think? Should there be non-fancy water for anyone who is thirsty?



US Airways' Fee Too Far
[Courant]
Starting Today, No More Free Water on US Air [WSJ Middle Seat Blog]
(Photo: caseywest )

]]>
Consumerist-5033186 Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:52:53 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5033186&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Attention World: A US Airways Plane Is Just A "Flying Vending Machine" ]]> When US Airways announced that they would no longer be offering complimentary beverages in coach, we wondered how long it would take before other airlines ditched the free stuff. So far, none have, and the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA), has denounced the move, calling US Airways planes "flying vending machines."

The flight attendants say that not only does this "nickel and dime" approach turn flight attendants into "cashiers," it could cause an already irritated traveling public to become enraged:

"In the current industry of customer frustration, the last thing flight attendants want to do is add fuel to the fire," said a spokesperson in a press release.

Bloomberg reports that US Airways is trying to calm fears of a violent uprising by instituting a policy of non-confrontation with potential insurgents.

“We’re trained to keep order on an airplane and defuse confrontation,” Mike Flores, president of US Airways’ A.F.A. chapter, said in an interview Thursday. “If it takes giving a free beverage to somebody to do that, so be it. I expect there will be flight attendants who just give everything away.”

No Free Coffee on US Airways (Unless, of Course, You Insist) [NYT]
US Airways Aircraft Turn Into Flying Vending Machines (Press Release) [Portfolio]
US Airways' air-rage incentive [Economist]
(Photo: Jenna Belle )

]]>
Consumerist-5032747 Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:32:02 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5032747&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Ultimate "Rule 240" List ]]> Some airlines still call it "Rule 240" and others a "contract of carriage" but no matter what the name, it still means the same thing: power to the traveler. But which airlines still use it and how much does it protect a traveler?

If your flight is canceled or you're given a wrong connection, the airline might have to put you on another flight for free, even if it's on another airline. Airfarewatchdog blog has put together a handy table to help you tell which airlines follow these procedures, and to what degree. They also have links to the contracts of carriage for the airlines that have them posted online. Handy to check if you're covered before booking, and also good to print out and bring with you to the airport just in case you need to invoke your rights and the airline employee has forgotten their own policies.

Rule 240 Revisited [Airfarewatchdog Blog]

]]>
Consumerist-5030037 Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:29:04 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5030037&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Oil! Airlines Issue Open Letter Asking You To Help Them Lobby Congress ]]> In a letter signed by 12 CEOs, the US air travel industry has called upon you, their customers, to help them lobby congress. What's the problem that they need help solving? Oil speculation. Read the letter inside.

An Open letter to All Airline Customers:

Our country is facing a possible sharp economic downturn because of skyrocketing oil and fuel prices, but by pulling together, we can all do something to help now.

For airlines, ultra-expensive fuel means thousands of lost jobs and severe reductions in air service to both large and small communities. To the broader economy, oil prices mean slower activity and widespread economic pain. This pain can be alleviated, and that is why we are taking the extraordinary step of writing this joint letter to our customers. Since high oil prices are partly a response to normal market forces, the nation needs to focus on increased energy supplies and conservation. However, there is another side to this story because normal market forces are being dangerously amplified by poorly regulated market speculation.

Twenty years ago, 21 percent of oil contracts were purchased by speculators who trade oil on paper with no intention of ever taking delivery. Today, oil speculators purchase 66 percent of all oil futures contracts, and that reflects just the transactions that are known. Speculators buy up large amounts of oil and then sell it to each other again and again. A barrel of oil may trade 20-plus times before it is delivered and used; the price goes up with each trade and consumers pick up the final tab. Some market experts estimate that current prices reflect as much as $30 to $60 per barrel in unnecessary speculative costs.

Over seventy years ago, Congress established regulations to control excessive, largely unchecked market speculation and manipulation. However, over the past two decades, these regulatory limits have been weakened or removed. We believe that restoring and enforcing these limits, along with several other modest measures, will provide more disclosure, transparency and sound market oversight. Together, these reforms will help cool the over-heated oil market and permit the economy to prosper.

The nation needs to pull together to reform the oil markets and solve this growing problem.

We need your help. Get more information and contact Congress by visiting www.StopOilSpeculationNow.com.

They've sent you an EECB... how will you respond?

Airlines: Curb oil speculation [CNN]

]]>
Consumerist-5023928 Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:59:46 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5023928&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ US Airways Dumps In-Flight Movies, Not Enough Passengers Buying $5 Headsets ]]> Too many passengers were bringing their own headsets, so US Airways has discontinued in-flight movies. US Airways had been hoping to switch from their heavy 500lb movie system to lightweight fiber optic personal systems, but that plan has also been axed. New US Airways planes will be delivered with no entertainment system.

Sales of $5 headsets “has gone off a cliff” according to a US Airways spokesperson. “What was economical 18 months ago is not economical today,” he said. “The things we were looking at for tomorrow, in general, have had to be put on hold.”

US Airways has already discontinued free snacks, started charging $2 for beverages that were formerly complimentary, and added a $15 fee to check one bag and an additional $25 fee to check a second bag.

In-flight movies cut at US Airways [Charlotte Observer] (Thanks, Glenn!)
(Photo: Jenna Belle )

]]>
Consumerist-5023357 Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:12:19 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5023357&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How to Avoid Airline Baggage Fees ]]> The bad news is that because of high fuel costs, United Airlines and US Airways will be following American Airlines in charging a $15 first-bag fee. The even worse news is that most of the remaining airlines will probably follow suit with the exception Southwest who locked in their fuel prices several years ago. Since the airlines are attempting to cash in on baggage fees, SmartMoney offers some tips on how to avoid them. The tips, inside...

Some tips on carry-on bags:

Embrace the middle seat
Often, there is more space for your carry-on under the middle seat, however, sometimes airplanes have equipment stored under them. You can usually find information on which seats to avoid in the airline's carry-on bag restrictions or in their policy section on traveling with pets.

Board Early
To get that precious overhead-bin space, get familiar with how your airline boards the plane. "Most carriers allow passengers with disabilities and elite frequent fliers to board first. Northwest offers open boarding in no particular order, while Delta often starts with the window seats in the back. "

Be aware of carry-on limits
For example, American Airlines limits carry-ons to 45 linear inches (length+width+height) and 40 lbs. They also allow one small personal item like a purse or briefcase.

Some tips on checked bags:

Check airline exemptions
"American and United waive first-bag fees for first- or business-class passengers and elite frequent fliers. All major carriers still allow two checked bags for flights with an international leg. You might also be exempt if you bought your ticket before the new fee goes into effect. US Airways won't charge those who purchased tickets before July 9. Consider planning future trips on an airline that hasn't yet announced a first-bag fee."

Note item exceptions

Usually strollers, child car-seats and wheelchairs are free of charge. Since each airline has different restrictions regarding weight and dimensions, make sure you review the policies on the airlines you plan to fly.

Start small
If you start with a large bag you will tend to stuff more inside increasing your bag's chance of being overweight. As a rule of thumb, don't check a bag bigger than 24 inches if you want to stay under weight limits.

Look for a cheap light bag

Unless you are a frequent traveler, it is advantageous to go with lighter luggage which only needs to withstand a few trips a year. High end luggage is obviously more durable but weighs a good deal more.

How to Avoid Paying Airline Baggage Fees [SmartMoney]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-5019000 Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:47:25 EDT Jay Slatkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5019000&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ U.S. Airways Refunds $2200 Tickets For Recently Unemployed Man ]]> Travel expert Christopher Elliott says US Airways refunded a couple $2200 on a pair of nonrefundable tickets to Ireland after the wife wrote to the COO and explained their situation. They tried Expedia first and were refused, and although they had travel insurance it wouldn't cover unemployment. The wife, Jennifer Bush, says the US Airways rep who responded to their plea "told me that they all felt for my situation and decided to refund the amount of the airfare."

Elliott says the act of charity "may have lost a little revenue in the short term, but I think it’s earned a customer for life." A LITTLE revenue? What about all the additional revenue they've just lost in checked baggage fees, drink and snack purchases, self-service seatbelt fastening surcharges, pressurized cabin fees, and that collection plate that's passed around after the flight attendant demonstrates how to put on the oxygen mask?

"Troubled airline refunds nonrefundable ticket to unemployed passenger" [Elliott.org]
(Photo: zonaphoto)

]]>
Consumerist-5018869 Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:22:12 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5018869&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Thirsty? US Airways To Charge $2 For Sodas, Juices, Bottled Water and Coffee in Coach ]]>
First US Airways did away with snacks, then they added a $15 fee to check a bag, and now they'll be charging $2 each for sodas, juices, bottled water and coffee in coach. Are you going to stand for this? Take our poll, inside.


New fee at US Airways: $2 soda
[Philadelphia Inquirer]
(Photo: John Kit )

]]>
Consumerist-5016294 Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:09:06 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5016294&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Yep, you guessed it: US Airways is going ... ]]>
Yep, you guessed it: US Airways is going to charge $15 for the first checked bag. [Yahoo!] (Thanks, James!)

]]>
Consumerist-5016000 Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:59:28 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5016000&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The New York Times says that the merger talks ... ]]> The New York Times says that the merger talks between United Airlines and US Airways have fallen apart. Boohoo. [NYT]

]]>
Consumerist-5011760 Thu, 29 May 2008 22:28:25 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5011760&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The 10 Most Annoying Airline Fees ]]> Forbes Traveler has put together a list of the top 10 most annoying airline fees, and it's a good one — or is it a bad one? Airlines are feeling the effect of skyrocking oil prices and they're trying their best to pass the costs along to you, their customers, without driving down demand. The result? These delightful fees. Gotcha!

Forbes Traveler's 10 Most Annoying Airline Fees

1. Checked Baggage: $10-$100
American Airlines now charges $15 for the first checked bag. Ugh.

2. Talking to Real People: $10-$25
"It costs $20 to book through a representative at American Airlines, and US Airways charges $15—the same as discount airlines JetBlue and Southwest."

3. Seat Preference: $10-$20
"United Airlines' Economy Plus plan is unique: For a $349 annual fee, one member and his or her companion are seated at the front of economy section whenever possible."

4. Rewards Redemption: $75-$100

Expect to pay this fee if miles are redeemed without "sufficient notice," and because you can't redeem the miles through the website, get ready to "pay for the convenience of booking through a ticket agent."

5. Curbside Check-In: $2-$3+
Remember, this fee doesn't include tip.

6. Traveling with a Child or a Pet: $10-$100 and up
"Delta recently doubled its [unaccompanied minor] rate to $100 and Continental upped its charge to $75 on direct flights and $100 on trips with connections."

7. Changing a Reservation: $30-$200

"United Airlines has hiked its ticket-changing charge from $100 to $150. "

8. Paper Ticket: $50-$70

"Delta charges $50 to customers who still want a physical copy of their ticket."

9. Airport improvement: $4.50-$20+
"...the airport-improvement fee has one short-term impact: It makes your ticket more expensive."

10. Fuel Surcharge: $30-$300
"Fuel now accounts for 40 percent of a ticket's price, and surcharges are regularly $65 each way on most major carriers. "

For the full article and slide show, click here.

Annoying Airline Charges [Forbes Traveler]

(Photo: Travelin' Librarian )

]]>
Consumerist-5011716 Thu, 29 May 2008 17:20:27 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5011716&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ America's Most And Least Admired Products And Services: Budweiser Is Good, Coors Is Not ]]> Each year Fortune magazine does a survey to determine America's most admired companies. We took a look at their data and found the top 10 most admired companies for the quality of their products and services. We also found the least admired.

Oddly, beer topped each of the lists. Anheuser-Busch is the company most admired for the quality of its products, while Molson Coors is the least admired. The full lists inside.

The Top 10 Most Admired Companies Based On Quality of Products Or Services:

1 Anheuser-Busch
2 Nordstrom
3 Medco Health Solutions
4 John Deere
5 BMW
6* United Parcel Service
6* Adobe Systems
8 Fortune Brands
9 Procter & Gamble
10 Herman Miller

The Top 10 Least Admired Companies Based On Quality of Products Or Services:

1 Molson Coors Brewing
2 Amtrak
3 Dollar General
4 US Airways Group
5 Family Dollar Stores
6 Constellation Brands (Arbor Mist wine)
7 WellCare Health Plans
8 Amerco (parent company of U-Haul)
9 Northwest Airlines
10 Sears Holdings

What companies do you admire?

Best & Worst: Quality of Products And Services [Fortune]
(Photo: *nomad* )

]]>
Consumerist-5011427 Wed, 28 May 2008 16:18:38 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5011427&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ US Airways Officially Ends Snacks ]]> US Airways has decided that the $.03 per package that they were spending on your snack is just too much money! They're officially discontinuing free snacks for coach passengers as of June 1st.

US Airways' management has always been unapologetic about the grossness of US Airways' free snacks. As they told employees who requested better tasting pretzels:

"We've worked with our purchasing team," management explained, "to bring in many companies to compete on our main cabin tidbit item (pretzels). To date, no one has been able to match our current cost, about 3 cents per package."

US Airways Ends Free Snacks For Passengers [Bizjournals](Thanks, Peetah!)
(Photo: Zonaphoto )

PREVIOUSLY: Employees May Hate US Airways More Than Their Customers Do

]]>
Consumerist-5011343 Wed, 28 May 2008 11:22:33 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5011343&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ USAirways: Despite What Our Schedule Says, We Haven't Actually Had That Flight In 5 Years ]]>
Reader Jon made the mistake of trusting the USAirways website to have an accurate schedule of their Boston to NY shuttle service. Whoops.

My company has a deal with USAir where we can go to the ticket counter in Boston and get discount tickets on the LaGuardia or Washington DC Shuttle. We're not supposed to book ahead; just go to the counter and show our IDs and get the discount fare.

It's Friday night last week, and it's 7:30 at night. I'm trying to get to New York. I go online, type in "us airways shuttle schedule" and am shown to a page on usairways.com (screen shot attached). Seeing that there's a 9:00 PM flight (the page indicates that flights are 6:00 AM to 9:00 PM hourly), I get in a cab and head to Logan Airport. [This 9:00 flight is to be the last Boston to NY flight of the night on any airline.]

When I arrive at 8:10 or so, the entire Shuttle ticketing counter is dark and there is a security gate pulled in front of it. I walk down the hall to the USAir main counter and a friendly but hapless fellow looks in his computer and tells me that the last Shuttle flight had left at 8:00. A supervisor joins him; both insist that my story about the phantom flight is either made up or a result of user error — I must have looked at LaGuardia to Boston, or on Sunday when there is a 9:00 flight, or whatever. With my handy iPhone, I show them the web page: Boston to LaGuardia, weekdays, 6:00 AM to 9:00 PM hourly. [Hey Apple, great commercial fodder there: use your iPhone to prove customer service agents wrong.]

They look up other flights, nothing. Offer a flight at 6:00 AM the next day, no thanks. I leave them as they tell me, "Sir, I know that our schedule indicates a 9:00 flight, but we haven't had a flight past 8:00 for at least the past five years."

In the end, I spent nearly $60 to get to and then from the airport. USAir would not give me a cab voucher, and the airport manager on duty, Cammy, was easily one of the rudest and least helpful airline types I've come across. I got to NY by Amtrak on a train that arrived late at 2:15 AM.

Remember when USAir began with "U"? The airline still sucked back then, but maybe it sucked just a little bit less.

Jon

It might be worth it to try escalating this complaint with US Airways, as your company has a (presumably) valuable business relationship with the airline. If nothing else, send your complaint to the Department of Transportation.

]]>
Consumerist-5011089 Tue, 27 May 2008 11:25:15 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5011089&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ United Airlines Talking Merger With US Airways, Keeping Continental On The Side ]]> United Airlines is a slut. The airline has been talking merger with US Airways, even going so far as to make it clear that US Airways CEO Doug "I'm OK To Drive" Parker can be the CEO of the combined company when United boss Glenn Tilton retires, says Reuters. Meanwhile, while the airline has been talking marriage, family and kids with Parker, it has been negotiating with Continental on the side — trying to form an "alliance" of some kind. Continental, of course, is already dating American AND British Airways!

From the AP:

Continental is also still in discussions about an alliance with AMR Corp.'s American Airlines and British Airways, said an official with knowledge of those talks. That person also was not authorized to discuss the matter and requested anonymity.

The official said it would not be unusual for Continental to be considering alternatives, but that the British Airways-Continental-American talks are progressing and don't appear in jeopardy.

Nasty, airlines. Nasty.

United's Tilton to give Parker a shot at top job-FT [Reuters]
AP source: United, Continental in alliance talks [AP]
(Photo: Zonaphoto )

]]>
Consumerist-5009137 Thu, 15 May 2008 09:27:14 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5009137&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ American Airlines Flirting With US Airways On Possible Merger ]]> con_locklearunderwoodlax158.jpgAn unnamed source has told Reuters that American Airlines is in talks with US Airways about a possible merger—and that it's also in talks with Continental about sharing passengers! Meanwhile, Continental is currently in talks with United about a possible merger of its own, and has said it will only choose one partner eventually. United, on the other hand, is not only pursuing Continental but is also in talks with US Airways about a merger. Yes, we have an airlines romantic triangle, folks. Someone's heart is going to end up broken.

So where will all this drama end? We figure by the end of the season, US Airways will be merging with someone in a cute wedding chapel, but then a bunch of men will run in firing machine guns and we won't know who lived and who died until the fall!

Combining United with Continental would create a company with a combined $35 billion in revenue and nearly 100,000 employees, surpassing the Delta-Northwest combination as the world's largest airline.
 
But that merger may not happen. United Airlines, whose shares plunged 40 percent when it reported a quarterly loss earlier this week, is also talking to US Airways.
 
Analysts have said a merger between those two carriers would be less complex than one between United and Continental Airlines.
 
JP Morgan analyst Jamie Baker earlier this week said a deal between United and US Airways could be easier when it comes to aligning the wages of pilots, combining fleets and reducing flights and seats.

 
"American Airlines in talks with Continental, US Air" [Reuters]
(Photo: LAX)

]]>
Consumerist-384289 Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:39:58 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=384289&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Future Of Air Travel Fees ]]> Minyanville has received a leaked copy of how a US Airways ticket will look after they apply some new fees that are currently under development...

[Minyanville via Upgrade: Travel Better]

]]>
Consumerist-383332 Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:21:50 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=383332&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ US Airways Pilot Who Fired Gun In Cockpit Will Himself Be Fired ]]> The US Airways pilot who accidentally fired his weapon in the cockpit of a plane will be fired, says CNN. The pilot, Capt. James Langenhahn, 55, was not available for comment. He told investigators that he was stowing his weapon in preparation to land when the gun went off. The bullet pierced the jet's fuselage but did not hit any crucial wiring or instrumentation, according to the TSA.

A group that trains pilots to carry handguns, the Federal Flight Deck Officers Association, says it will fight the termination. "This was accidental not intentional," Karn told CNN. "This is not the way to treat a long-term pilot."

Group: Pilot whose gun went off will be fired [CNN]
(Photo:zonaphoto)

]]>
Consumerist-381252 Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:29:31 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=381252&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Ultimate Airline Bankruptcy And Merger Cheat Sheet ]]> Thinking of taking a trip but can't remember which airlines are bankrupt and which ones are part of Delta? We know it can be difficult—that's why we've put together a little cheat sheet to help you get through this time of uncertainty.

We've listed most of the major airlines and their regional affiliates. We've indicated whether the airlines are now defunct, part of Delta, recently bankrupt, or possibly looking for love with another airline. Regional airlines are marked with their affiliates' logos. Watch out Continental... we think United has her eye on you. Enjoy!

stateoftheair.jpg

]]>
Consumerist-379773 Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:51:00 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=379773&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ A piece of a US Airways jet has fallen off ... ]]> midwestmidwest.jpgA piece of a US Airways jet has fallen off and landed somewhere in Maryland. [ABC2]

]]>
Consumerist-371471 Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:59:55 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=371471&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ US Airways Pilot's Gun Fires During A Flight ]]> bangbangbang.jpgWHO: US Airways and the TSA
WHAT: A gun carried by a US Airways pilot accidentally discharged during a flight from Denver to Charlotte on Saturday, according to airline and federal officials. No one was injured, and the aircraft was not in any danger during the flight, officials said. The pilot had been approved by the TSA to carry the weapon.
WHERE:Pilot's gun goes off on US Airways flight [Charlotte Observer]
THE QUOTE:In a statement, the TSA said that the agency and "Federal Air Marshals Service take this matter seriously and it is receiving immediate attention."

"Taking it seriously" is a phrase companies use over and over again in public statements whenever they have bad PR. Our series of posts on occurrences of the phrase is our attempt to question how seriously companies are really taking these matters if every time they trot out this phrase by rote. To see more examples of how companies are "taking it seriously" click here.

(Photo:Flying Photog)

]]>
Consumerist-371377 Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:55:07 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=371377&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ US Airways To Charge $25 For Checking 2 Bags ]]> steamertrunks.jpgIf you find yourself identifying with those dames in movies set in the 19th century who always travel with a stagecoach full of steamer trunks, you won't like US Airways new policy. Starting May 5, US Airways will levy a $25 fee against passengers checking a second bag. United Airlines announced the same thing earlier this month, and is also starting the fee on May 5. We can expect to see more and more of these fees as airlines struggle to make money, making it even harder to comparison shop for tickets. As Upgrade: Travel Better notes, no airfare search engine is equipped to take add-on fees into account (hello, market opportunity somebody?). Inside, the email US Airways sent out to its passengers.

usairways2ndbag.jpg(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-361266 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:49:22 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361266&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sensing A Pattern: United Airlines Planes Clip Wings At Dulles International Airport ]]> Pilots need to pay attention when they're taxiing around the airport. Just a week after two US Airways planes clipped wings at Reagan Airport, two United Airlines planes decided to snuggle up at Dulles International Airport.

Two United Airlines planes were being inspected Sunday night after their wings touched at Dulles International Airport outside Washington. Officials say there are no reports of injuries.

Rob Yingling, a spokesman for the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, says a Boeing 737 and a smaller Embraer aircraft were preparing for departure Sunday evening when their wings touched. They were on the taxiway

United Airlines Clip Wins At Dulles [MSNBC] (Thanks, Andrew!)
(Photo:Zonaphoto)

]]>
Consumerist-360516 Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:46:15 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=360516&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ LAX Terminal Evacuated Due To "Suspicious Comment" ]]> 20 Southwest Airlines and 2 U.S. Airways flights were delayed after a LAX terminal was evacuated for two hours due to a "suspicious comment" made by a passenger on SWA Flight 1182 from El Paso. We were unable to find out what exactly the "suspicious comment" was, but UPI suggests that it had something to do with explosives in his luggage. The LAPD bomb squad was called, but no explosives were found.

The passenger has been taken into custody, but the whole thing makes us wonder what the comment was. Why can't we hear it? Is it like the "The Funniest Joke in the World?" Once we find it and post it, will they have to evacuate the building where you work because you read it?


LAX Passenger Detained, Flights Delayed After 'Suspicious Comment'
[KNBC]
(Photo:JohnKit)

]]>
Consumerist-357742 Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:54:54 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=357742&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ US Airways Planes Clip Wings At Reagan International ]]> Two US Airways jets clipped wings at Reagan International Airport yesterday says the Washington Post:

Courtney Prebich, a MWAA spokeswoman, said that the two planes — a U.S. Airways Airbus A319 headed to LaGuardia Airport and a smaller U.S. Airways Express regional jet on the way to Rochester, N.Y. — were in an area at the north side of the airport waiting for their turn at the runway when the collision occurred.

The smaller jet — operated by regional carrier Republic Airways — was carrying 21 passengers in taxi mode toward the runway when it clipped the wing of the larger aircraft and became lodged there, according to Andrea Rader, a spokeswoman for U.S. Airways.

Emergency response vehicles evacuated a total of 63 passengers from the two planes onto buses and took them to the airport terminal, where they were booked onto later flights, officials said. One passenger complaining of back pain after the collision was taken to a nearby hospital for examination, Prebich said.

Boy, that doesn't instill a lot of confidence in your pilot, does it?

U.S. Airways Planes Clip Wings at Reagan Airport [Washington Post]
(Photo:Cubbie_n_Vegas)

]]>
Consumerist-357457 Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:09:18 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=357457&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ US Airways Downgrades Frequent Flyer Program ]]> usairwayblack.jpgUS Airways sent out an email this morning to frequent flyer members announcing that it was going to make it harder to earn frequent flyer miles. It used to be that no matter how far the trip was, you would earn at least 500 frequent flyer miles per leg. Now you will only earn the actual number of miles flown. "This pretty much kills anyone who makes US Air Shuttle Trips from NYC / Bos. / DC locations," writes reader Mike. In addition, if you use your frequent flyer miles to schedule a ticket within 14 days of purchase, they will charge you a $50 fee. Full text of the announcement, inside...

Dividend Miles program changes As part of our continuing efforts to provide valuable benefits to our frequent flyers, US Airways is making a change to our Dividend Miles program. We're making these changes to offset record fuel prices and rising airline related expenses while maintaining the benefits you've come to expect. Beginning May 1, 2008, Dividend Miles will award the actual number of miles flown rather than a minimum number of miles flown for each segment. Also, members who redeem miles for award travel within 14-days of departure on usairways.com will be assessed a quick ticketing fee.

Here's a summary of the policy changes:

Accrual

* Tickets purchased on/after March 1, 2008 for travel on US Airways on/after May 1, 2008 will earn the actual number of miles flown and will no longer earn a minimum of 500 miles per segment.
* Tickets flown on partner airlines after May 1, 2008 will earn the actual number of miles flown.

Tickets purchased prior to March 1, 2008 will continue to earn the 500 mile minimum for travel after May 1, 2008. Accrual on flight segments greater than 500 miles in length are not impacted by this change.

Redemption

* Members redeeming miles for award travel online within 14-days of departure will be assessed a quick ticketing fee of $50 per ticket.

A quick ticketing fee of $75 per award ticket will continue to apply for award tickets purchased from US Airways Reservations. Chairman's and Platinum Preferred members booking within 14-days (both online and by phone) are exempt from the fee.

Dividend Miles members still get award travel for as low as 25,000 miles. And, we offer the most generous Preferred upgrade windows in the industry. Earn miles when you fly to any of our 230 destinations in the U.S., Canada, Europe, the Caribbean and Latin America. You can also earn and redeem miles to the nearly 900 destinations served by the Star Alliance.
Thanks for continuing to fly with US.

(Photo: Meghann Marco)

]]>
Consumerist-356444 Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:16:16 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=356444&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 5 Airlines You Shouldn't Trust With Your Luggage ]]> The Department of Transportation's 2007 Air Travel Consumer Report is out. Here are the 5 airlines with the most baggage handling complaints per customer in 2007. Better luck next year!

5. MESA AIRLINES (operates flights for Delta Airlines, United Airlines, USAirways and Midwest Airlines)

4. SKYWEST AIRLINES (operates flights for United Express, Delta Connection and Midwest Connect)

3. ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES (operated by Delta Airlines)

2. COMAIR (operated by Delta Airlines)

1. AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES (operated by American Airlines)

Air Travel Consumer Report (PDF) [DOT]
(Photo:Cubbie_N_Vegas)

]]>
Consumerist-353359 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:59:47 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=353359&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Reach US Airways Executive Customer Service ]]> usairwaysplane.jpg877-369-6512 is the number for the US Airways Executive Office.

RELATED: How To Behave When Calling Executive Customer Service
(Photo: zonaphoto)

]]>
Consumerist-339508 Wed, 02 Jan 2008 10:45:56 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=339508&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Miss Your Plane And US Airways Cancels Your Return Flight, Offers No Compensation ]]> Reader Chad is at the airport right now and boy is he angry at US Airways.

I have a lovely story that I hope you'll run about our favorite industry... Airlines :)

I'm on a blackberry so forgive my typing.

On December 10th I booked a flight with "US airways" to Ohio from Fort Lauderdale, FL all went well and I actually landed a decent price ($300) for my round trip ticket. I was supposed to fly in the 23rd and fly out the 27th. On the 12th my friend let me know he was moving north and would be driving up. Being the buddy I am I agreed to accompany him on his trek and help with driving (19.5 hours on the road). This meant I would leave town on the 20th... 3 days before my scheduled flight.

The drive was long and tiring but we made it in 1 shot and I was in Ohio before my flight ever departed. The 23rd came and went no phone calls, no emails, no nadda from any of the parties involved. Today is the 27th and as I stand in Dayton OH and my flight leaves without me I have decided to write you my story.

See apparently if you book a round trip ticket and miss part of the flight "US airways" cancels all other flights related to said flight without notification. As if this isn't a bit of a shock, they also refuse to issue a refund or credit towards other flights... They did say the would roll the cost into another ticket, it would only cost me another $300 after fines and differences in price! What a deal...

I passed on such a wonderful offer after pleading with them they informed me that my scheduled flight was full, so even though my ticket was cancelled... even if it wasn't, I couldn't get on the plane anyway. So they had sold the same seat to 2 people... How is this industry is so broke with business tactics like this I will never know.

I ended up booking another flight at another airport with another airline (US airways will never get another dollar from me). In my 2 hours of down time I decided to give them a call and see if I couldn't at least get credit towards a future flight... Or maybe my money back.

I went through 4 supervisors and at least 2 call centers, once I was threatened with a hang up for losing my cool. Long story short I'm out $300. The last lady who helped me was by far the nicest however she wouldn't cop a deal either. I tried various routes... I just wanted "something" for my $300... And I don't mean a headache or phone thuggery. I tried getting 150 packets of $2 peanuts, maybe 300 pairs of disposable ear phones... Or maybe a credit voucher for a flight... Or maybe some money back. All without result.

In closing to our conversation I told her "I hope you enjoy your $300 because I will never fly your airline again, and I'll make sure to let everyone know of my joyous experience... I hope this costs you thousands, happy holidays."

Thanks a lot and keep up the good work guys!

-Chad Seaman

We've heard of airlines canceling return flights if the customer misses the plane, but it seems really harsh to try to charge the poor guy another $300! Any seasoned travelers have advice for Chad?

(Photo:zonaphoto)

]]>
Consumerist-338281 Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:32:17 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=338281&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ U.S. Airways Strands Woman In Wheelchair On The Tarmac? ]]> strandedonthetarmac.jpgThis story has plenty of salaciousness and few details, but here we go: A woman is claiming that U.S. Airways employees helped her off of her flight from Bakersfield to Las Vegas, then left her parked in a wheelchair on the tarmac, causing her to miss her connection to Orlando. Eventually, another employee found the woman, wheeled her into a hallway and left. The woman's daughter says that the employee told her mother, "this is not my job, but I can park you here."

Her daughter told WKMG in Orlando:

"She called me at 3 a.m., crying hysterically because she didn't know what to do and no one would help her."

U.S. Airways responded:

"We are not happy to hear about this incident. We will work with our employees because that is not how we deal with our customers."

Wheelchair-Bound Woman Left On Tarmac [Local 6]
Woman stranded on tarmac [CNN] (Thanks, Lucas!)

]]>
Consumerist-338124 Thu, 27 Dec 2007 12:58:56 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=338124&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Employees May Hate US Airways More Than Their Customers Do ]]> US Airways is America's most hated major airline. It's not really a secret. What's new and exciting is that the employees actually hate the airline more than you do, according to the New York Times, and it's not for the reasons you might suspect. They actually hate the dirty airplanes and gross food, too.

A rich record of the employee discontent emerges from regular question-and-answer sessions held at US Airways, which is both the worst-performing big airline in the country and a company that encourages its 36,000 workers to direct tough questions at its chief executive, W. Douglas Parker.

"Doug, I watched you on CNBC today," said one e-mail message from a worker, sent on Oct. 25. "And I hate to tell you but the interiors of our plans [sic] smell bad and they are filthy. As an employee I am embarrassed to admit working for US Airways. When are you going to quit talking and do something about it?"

The rancor is not any worse at US Airways than at most other big carriers. What is different is that Mr. Parker, 46, subscribes to the let-it-all-hang-out school of employee relations. He says management learns a lot about how the airline is actually performing through an uncensored give-and-take — and he willingly provided transcripts of the Q. and A. sessions.

And here's our favorite part. Why are the snacks so gross on US Airways? Because better tasting pretzle suppliers can't beat $0.03 a package!
"We've worked with our purchasing team," management explained, "to bring in many companies to compete on our main cabin tidbit item (pretzels). To date, no one has been able to match our current cost, about 3 cents per package."
We'd say US Airways was like Walmart Airlines, but we don't want to be unfair to Walmart.

Fliers Fed Up? Airline Employees Feel the Same [New York Times via Kottke]
(Photo:meghannmarco)

]]>
Consumerist-337858 Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:39:50 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=337858&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ US Airways Isn't Flexible About Their $100 Flight Change Fee ]]> Reader Sara writes to U.S. Airways:


Dear Doug Parker,

Due to the snowstorm in the Northeast, I have decided to cancel my overnight trip from New York City to Boston, which I booked on US Airways. USAir posted a travel alert for both of these cities this weekend, and the dates that I had planned to fly—leaving Saturday Dec. 15 and returning Sunday Dec. 16—are within the travel range that USAir posted on its web site.

The USAir site said that it had relaxed certain guidelines due to the snowstorm. However the perimeters are so narrow—I must reschedule my trip within seven days of the original flight—that it is useless to me. Next week is Christmas and, like most people in this country, I have other commitments.

That leaves me paying a $100 penalty on a ticket that cost $251, and of course I don't get any sort of refund, just $151 credit toward another flight.

Considering that I am canceling my trip due to the weather, this transfer fee is outrageous. JetBlue charges only $25 for a transfer fee—for any reason. That is why I have decided to stop traveling USAir for my regular trips to Boston. From now on, I will fly JetBlue.

Also, I haven't officially canceled my flight on USAir yet. USAir has provided me with absolutely no incentive to give them early warning of my plans. There is no reason for me to provide USAir with the courtesy of an early decision to cancel my flight (and give USAir the opportunity to sell the seat) so I'm planning to hold the ticket until the last possible minute.

I am writing this letter in the hopes that you will reconsider this extremely punitive policy. None of us can control the weather, and if it was even a $50 fee I would not be so put off. I have flown the USAir shuttle to Boston many times and have always had a good experience. But this entire incident leaves me feeling very cheated, and feeling very badly about USAir.

Sincerely,

Sara

U.S. Airways reply:
Dear Ms. [Redacted],

Thank you for contacting US Airways. We appreciate and welcome all inquiries, concerns, and compliments, as your feedback is important to us.

I regret you are not happy with our relaxed weather ticket policy. If you do decide to travel and check-in for your flight, if the flight cancels your ticket can be refunded.

If you decide to cancel before that time, the $100 reissue fee will apply.

Thank you for allowing us to explain our position. We hope to see you on a future US Airways flight.

Sincerely,
Customer Relations
Corporate Office

We think that reply was code for "Go fly another airline, see if we care," so that's what we recommend in this case. We're sure JetBlue will be happy to have you.

(Photo:randomduck)

]]>
Consumerist-334025 Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:59:15 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=334025&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ US Airways is charging a $5 extra fee if ... ]]> US Airways is charging a $5 extra fee if you book on its own site. Yes, on the USairways.com site. [Upgrade Travel Better]

]]>
Consumerist-333594 Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:48:47 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=333594&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ U.S. Airways is now suing the state of New ... ]]> midwestmidwest.jpgU.S. Airways is now suing the state of New Mexico, claiming that they do not have the right to deny them a liquor license. [KVIA]

]]>
Consumerist-332631 Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:21:12 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=332631&view=rss&microfeed=true