<![CDATA[Consumerist: Graphs]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Graphs]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/graphs http://consumerist.com/tag/graphs <![CDATA[ So, How Much Money Are Banks Borrowing Thanks To The Mortgage Meltdown? ]]> Here's a graph from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis that shows, historically, how much money banks have borrowed from the Federal Reserve.

Series: BORROW, Total Borrowings of Depository Institutions from the Federal Reserve [Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis via Digg]

]]>
Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:51:42 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5032035&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Verizon Was The Most Frequent Target For Identity Theft Scams In 2007 ]]> Identity theft reports to the Federal Trade Commission show that Verizon was the most frequently named company, averaging over 900 events per month in 2007. According to an updated study by Chris Hoofnagle, senior fellow at the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology, the number of complaints involving Verizon nearly tripled from 2006. Rounding out the top five are AFNI (a collection agency), JP Morgan Chase, AT&T, and Capital One.

We wrote about Hoofnagle's research in February, when he was analyzing identity theft at banks. Since then, he's expanded his research to include incidents at all companies.

Although the research is useful, Hoofnagle concedes that it is imperfect: a customer who falls for a phishing scam doesn't necessarily impart any fault to the company. On the other hand, the amount of phishing-related identity thefts is dwarfed by other types of fraud, such as new accounts created from pre-approved credit solicitations. Hoofnagle asks for increased transparency by businesses, which would provide more useful data and lead to better analysis.

Measuring Identity Theft (Version 2.0)

]]>
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:54:12 EDT Alex Chasick http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028899&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Pretty Graphs Track Drowning Dollar ]]> These graphs by GOOD magazine show how much the dollar has sunk against various currencies from May 07-April 08. But don't feel too bad, folks, at least we're giving the South African Rand a thorough drubbing.

Currency: The Sinking Dollar [GOOD]

]]>
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:46:56 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5014991&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Visualizing Inflation As A Pile Of Mold ]]> The NYT has a cool graphic up that shows all the parts of the Consumer Price Index and uses a color scheme to show how much they've gone up by in the past year. Go to the version on their site so you can zoom in closer on all the cells. It looks like a horribly growing fungus inside a petri dish, which I guess is not far from the truth.

All of Inflation’s Little Parts [NYT] (Thanks to Natan!)

]]>
Fri, 09 May 2008 14:23:11 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5008442&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Consumer Price Index Shows That Consumers Like Eating Out, Gasoline ]]> The New York Times made a pretty cool graph out of the Consumer Price Index, which tracks changes in prices for many consumer goods over the past year. Turns out, gas prices went up.

The Times graph, a form of Voronoi Treemap, divides consumer spending into numerous categories and subcategories, allowing you to see what percentage of an average consumer's spending is used for food versus transportation, or on citrus fruit versus tires. Some interesting highlights:

  • Electronics took the biggest dip in prices. From March 2007 to March 2008, TVs dropped 18.3% and computers dropped 12%.
  • Not surprisingly, the biggest price increases were in fuel: Gas went up 26%, propane and firewood went up 23.4%, and fuel oil (for home heating) went up 48.4%.
  • The only non-fuel item that increased by more than 20% was eggs, which went up 29.9%.
  • Consumers spend the same amount on "alcohol away from home" (0.5%) as they do on health insurance.
  • We spend too much damn money on fast food. The only categories where we spend more money are rent, gas, electricity, new cars, and meals at non-fast food restaurants. Yes, this is because other categories like groceries are subdivided into produce and meat and so on, but 2.4% is still a sizable chunk of spending.

All of Inflation's Little Parts [NYT]
(Photo: =Rah=)

]]>
Wed, 07 May 2008 00:55:14 EDT Alex Chasick http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5008065&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ With consumers pounded by dissapearing jobs, ... ]]> foodstamprecepients.jpgWith consumers pounded by dissapearing jobs, and rising gas and food prices, food stamp use is projected to reach record levels in 2008 and 2009. [NYT]

]]>
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:50:27 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=374253&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Estimated Hourly Wages For The Lowest Paying Jobs In The U.S. ]]> con_fairridesatnight.jpg The blog Political Calculations took data from the Congressional Budget Office, "which published a study of the lowest-wage workers in the U.S. from 1979 through 2005," and looked at the occupations of the bottom 20% of earners in the U.S. Then it took a chart of the 10 full-time jobs with the lowest annual earnings as compiled by BizJournals.com and estimated the hourly wage based on 40-hour weeks. Conclusion: don't plan on operating a Tilt-a-Whirl and retiring comfortably.

Three of the jobs—waiting tables, bartending, and, uh, bellhopping?—don't include unreported tips. After the food and beverage jobs, the next lowest spot on the chart is "Amusement and Recreation Facility Attendants." Interesting—this could explain why that Zipper ride operator at the fair yelled at us when we were kids and tried to scoop up spare change that fell out of riders' pockets. That was his money.

Average Hourly Wages as estimated by Political Calculations
* does not include unreported tip income
 
Waiters and waitresses*
Waiters and waitresses' assistants
Bartenders*
Amusement and Recreation Facility Attendants
Baggage Porters and Bellhops*
Food Preparation Workers Not Classified Elsewhere
Early Childhood Teacher's Assistants
Maids and Housemen
Teacher's Aides
Food Preparation Kitchen Workers
 $4.21
$5.94
$6.39
$6.97
$7.20
$7.77
$7.96
$7.99
$8.01
$8.43

"The Jobs That Pay the Least" [Political Calculations]

"America's 25 Best and Worst Paying Jobs"
(Photo: Mister Scratch)

]]>
Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:29:04 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=363893&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ HSBC Is The Most Identity-Theft Prone Bank ]]> If you're a customer with Bank of America or HSBC, you're more likely to be a victim of identity theft, according to a new report. Chris Hoofnagle, a senior fellow at the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology at the University of California at Berkeley, compiled a list of all the banks mentioned in identity theft complaints filed with the FTC for January, March and September of 2006. Bigger banks obviously have more incidents, so Hoofnagle factored in their total number of deposits."I've been working for years to try to spark a market, a true market, for competition on preventing fraud," Hoofnagle told the NYT. "Some of these institutions have attempted to compete based on advertisements, but I'm a real believer in the idea that if you give consumers information, they can make better decisions." This is only a fraction of the banks included, showing the worst offenders. Full graphs, inside...

It should be noted that the conclusions are less than perfect. What would be ideal is if the number of incidents were ranked by the number of accounts at the bank, not the total number of deposits. However, banks closely guard the number of their depositors and so for now, this is the best we have.incidentspermonth.jpgestimatedannual.jpgTAKEAWAY: HSBC, Bank of America: not safe. ING: safe.

]]>
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:00:00 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=361820&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Latest ACSI Survey Is Out: You Really Like Dollar General ]]> ACSI Department Store Rankings The American Customer Satisfaction Index has released its latest scores of retail businesses, so we thought we'd take a look at the department store rankings by constructing a handy graph. When it comes to customer satisfaction, apparently Dollar General is doing something right—and Wal-Mart, as usual, is doing lots of things wrong.

con_acsiq407-deptstores-lar.jpg
 
In the commentary on last quarters scores, ACSI says they've started including Nordstrom again because of its increasing market share, and back before it dropped off the survey in 2001, it held the top spot frequently, so no surprise there.

They also suggest that Dollar General, "which typically serves neighborhoods that may be too small to attract Wal-Mart," may be scoring high because of its wide variety of items in such small retail spaces.

Sears and Kmart are pretty much exactly where we'd expect them after their plunging customer service last year.

One thing we're not sure about is how the various recall disasters last year affected scores—clearly Dollar General emerged unscathed, despite its healthy dose of lead-tainted toys, Halloween pails, and holiday decorations.

"Q4 2007 and Historical ACSI Scores" [ACSI]
"Customer Satisfaction Falls Again; Retail, Financial Services Down; Wal-mart, Home Depot at All-Time Lows" [ACSI]

RELATED
"How are ACSI data collected?" [ACSI]

(Thanks to Shaula!)

]]>
Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:27:36 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=359148&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How You Spend Your Money ]]> http://consumerist.com/assets/resources/2008/02/howamericansspendtheirmoney-thumb.jpgOur brain nearly broke looking at this graph the New York Times published this weekend called How Americans Spend Their Money (click to enlarge). By the looks of it, poor people spend twice as much as they earn in taxable income. Rich people outspend the middle fifth on financial stuff by a factor of ~20:1. What the middle fifth and the lowest fifth spend on goods and services is closer than what the middle fifth and the highest fifth spend. The lowest fifth financial flows are very much in the negative. And that's about all the staring at a crazy graph we can do for the moment. What other trends can you see?

You Are What You Spend [NYT]

]]>
Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:00:00 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=356560&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Monthly Mortgage Rate Resets, 2007-2016 ]]> Credit Slips' Adam Levitin takes a look into the possibly even grimmer future of the housing market. We'll let him explain it because he's smart:

...this graph from Credit Suisse is the most sobering thing I've seen in a while. Mortgage_rate_resets It shows that most of the interest rate resets ahead aren't subprime, but are instead Alt-A and option-ARMs...

Alt-A is the category of loans made to consumers with FICO scores just above the subprime threshold. Option ARMs give borrowers several payment options, including making a minimum payment that does not even cover the interest that accrued in the last month. This means it's pretty easy for an option ARM to end up underwater, even in a market where prices are holding steady. If real estate prices are dropping, it is even more likely that an option ARM will end up upside down, which makes refinancing near impossible. The bulk of the Alt-A and option-ARM resets are coming in 2010-2011. A lot of things could change before then. But we might just be seeing the tip of the iceberg in the housing market.

Do you think all those people will be able to afford their resets?

Is This Just a "Sub-Prime" Mortgage Crisis? [Credit Slips]

]]>
Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:08:13 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=340334&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Vampire Electronics Suck Power Even While "Off" ]]> vampireelectronics.jpgAs long as they're still plugged in, most appliances are still sucking energy out of the wall, and dollars out your wallet. GOOD magazine made another one of their pretty graphs, this time featuring a large vampire, to show how much energy and money devices continue to leech. Some people, to combat this vampiric gadget effect, have most of their devices hooked up on powerstrips so they can fully cut power to all non-essential items with just a flick of a few switches.

Vampire Energy [GOOD Magazine]

]]>
Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:51:31 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=333417&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Installing CFLs Decreased Family's Electric Bill ]]> Blogging Away Debt made this graph to show how much their family reduced energy consumption by installing compact fluorescent light bulbs and unplugging a freezer in the basement. The chart shows a decrease of around 2-3 average kilowatts hours per day, resulting in electrical bills that were about a half as much as before.

A Few Changes Made a Big Difference in Our Electric Bill [Blogging Away Debt]

]]>
Wed, 12 Sep 2007 21:58:31 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=299367&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ CEO Pay Up 298%, Average Worker's? 4.3% (1995-2005) ]]> There's been a lot of ballyhoo lately about ballooning executive pay, so here's a look at how CEO incomes rose over the years in relation to Joe Blow's paycheck.

It looks like while CEO pay rose 298.2% by 2005, and corporate profits by 106.7%, the average worker pay has only risen by 4.3%.

The chart seems to show no direct relationship between CEO pay and profit performance, however, CEO pay does track nearly parallel with the S&P 500. That stock options are included in the CEO pay, and those have gotten more popular in recent years, might be a factor. Another is that the CEO population is smaller than that of the average workers, so naturally there's going to be more volatility.

Profits or losses, stocks up or down, the average worker gets paid nearly the same. Maybe the breed of CEOs is just working harder while everyone else is just treading water... — BEN POPKEN

CEO Pay, Stock Prices, Corporate Profits, Worker Pay, and Inflation, 1990-2005 [FairEconomy] (Thanks to something_amazing!)

]]>
Mon, 09 Apr 2007 17:10:52 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=250838&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Cellphone, Telephone, And Cable Costs Versus Inflation '96-'05 ]]> We made a graph comparing the rate of change in price of cable, telephone, and wireless service to inflation rate from 1996-2005.

We expected cable to be far worse, but it's really wireless whose cost grew at the fastest relative rate . Wonder why this is.

Does it reflect the cost of upgrading and expanding cellphone networks, while the infrastructure for cable and telephones has remained much the same? Or is it simply the price elasticity of demand (more popular = able to charge more)? — BEN POPKEN AND THOMAS MOORE

References:
Raw Data (updated)
Cable Pricing (PDF) [FCC]
Telephone and Wireless Pricing (PDF) [FCC]
Inflation Calculator [Bureau of Labor Statistics]

]]>
Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:23:05 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=247742&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Do PayDay Loan Centers Target The Poor? ]]> According to Virginia Delegate Jennifer L. McClellan, "There are over two payday lending stores for every McDonalds in Virginia and three for every Starbucks."

The thought of washing down a Big Mac with a chai was too appealing to ignore, so we mashed up Richmond, Virginia's 1990-2000 Poverty Statistics by Census Tract along with Payday loan center locations. * Click to enlarge.

Richmond payday centers seem to roughly prefer to sit on the edges of areas with 15-30% poverty. People got to have a paycheck to give them an advance on, with 177% interest.

If a worker is short of cash and gets their full next paycheck advanced to them, how are they ever supposed to catch up?

With a windfall investment, or perhaps, another loan. — BEN POPKEN

* Combining 2000 poverty data with 2007 addresses is, admittedly, less than ideal, but it was the best we could get our hands on.

]]>
Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:10:55 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=230564&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Graph: States Hit Hardest By Foreclosure Spree ]]> Which states are being hit the worst by the foreclosure spree? Here's the top 10.

Source: Realtytrac, US Census.

As the housing bubble deflates, it's time to collect on all those subprime loans. Note: Nevada is disproportionately represented here due to a sparse population, but California is definitely screwed.

Big sexy 50 state graph, inside...


troubledstatesbig2.jpgCheck out our data sets at Swivel, where we also made this graph.

— BEN POPKEN

]]>
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:27:25 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=224783&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Starbucks/McDonald's Global Dominion Graph ]]> Click to enlarge.

This totally kickass graph shows the Starbuck stores by country, along with the coffee bean, paper cup and sugar sources. On the right, it shows the McDonald's stores by country, but curiously, no sources.

This is because everything that goes into a McDonald's meal is made in a low-slung factory in New Jersey.

"The Magic Bean Shop, The Fries That Bind Us" (Thanks to Chris!)

]]>
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:17:36 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=196392&view=rss&microfeed=true