<![CDATA[Consumerist: Clothing]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Clothing]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/clothing http://consumerist.com/tag/clothing <![CDATA[ 'Identity Theft-Proof' Wallet Blocks RFID, Goes In Front Pocket ]]> If you're concerned about your RFID-chipped credit cards being skimmed, you might want to consider shielding them. DIFRwear makes a wallet with the shielding already included, and now roguewallet in Maine has introduced its own RFID-shielded version, with a fin-shaped design so it fits better in your front pocket to thwart pickpockets. Unfortunately, it's also $50, compared to $20 for the more conventional looking DIFRwear hip-pocket design. (Both are FIPS 201 compliant, if that means anything to you.)

Or, if you want to go the really cash-conscious route, make your own.

roguewallet.com (Thanks to Wells!)

]]>
Consumerist-5051800 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:15:00 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5051800&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ J. Crew's Notoriously Awful Website Charges You $9,208.50 To Ship The Wrong Shirt ]]> J. Crew has a problem with their website. Whatever the problem is, it isn't small. Meet Per, a J. Crew customer who tried to order some polo shirts and not only did he get the wrong shirts, the bill came with a shipping charge of $9,208.50. Per would like to return these shirts and not pay $9,208.50 in shipping, but he can't manage to log on to J. Crew's website.

Dear J Crew,

Re. my recent order:
1. Invoiced for $9208.50 in shipping charges. Scan of invoice attached.
2. Baby sized shirts shipped. I ordered men's medium sized polo shirts. (Size M as in the invoice). Photo attached.
3. Cannot sign into website, JSP_EXECUTION_FAILED, screenshot attached.

I would like to
1) Return the shirts for a refund - they are completely the wrong size.
2) Not be charged $9,208 for shipping
3) Not have to use the website to do this, as I can't log in

Can you reply to my email at as soon as possible? I am worried about my credit card being charged for the incorrect shipping cost.

Thanks
Per

He also attached this image of the tiny, tiny shirt that he received. How sad.

We're reasonably sure that no self-respecting credit card will allow a shipping charge of over $9k to go through without calling, but if the charge is incorrect, Per can call and do a chargeback.

J Crew Customer [Blogspot]

]]>
Consumerist-5034212 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:08:47 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5034212&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ J.Crew Apologizes For Bad Website, But That's All They Do ]]> A dozen readers (and probably a couple of PR flacks) must have forwarded us J.Crew's email today, in which the CEO and president of the company extend a mutual apology for the non-workingness of their "enhanced" website and call center. Oddly, the email simply asks customers to "bear with us" but doesn't offer any discount or sale. Well, maybe they figured driving more traffic to a broken site would only make things worse.

]]>
Consumerist-5031259 Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:47:04 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5031259&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Macy's Confirms It Never Did Business With Queens Sweatshop ]]> Last week, news broke that a sweatshop in Queens, NYC was producing clothing for several large U.S. retailers, while overworking its mainly Chinese immigrant employees and cheating them out of wages. At the time, Macy's announced it was cooperating with New York's Department of Labor and investigating the matter internally. Now the company has confirmed that it never did business with the sweatshop—in fact, it investigated it twice in 2007 while evaluating potential suppliers and rejected it for shoddy record keeping. Use your crazy Macy's coupons all you want, readers.

From Macy's own press release yesterday afternoon:

An internal investigation conducted by Macy's, however, discovered that no Macy's goods were found in Jin Shun. But a factory named Zheng Da Inc. in Long Island City, which also was inspected by the Department of Labor and also cited for labor law violations, was making apparently counterfeit goods with labels from a Macy's private brand. These goods, which were neither ordered nor authorized by Macy's, were private brand prints from previous seasons and of inferior quality to those made to Macy's specifications. Macy's, Inc. is considering legal action against the owners of the Zheng Da factory for unauthorized manufacturing of counterfeit goods under a label owned by Macy's.

Moreover, independent third-party monitors retained by Macy's twice inspected the Jin Shun factory in 2007 as Macy's was evaluating potential suppliers for its private brand merchandise. In both instances, the Jin Shun facility was rejected and removed from consideration because of incomplete employment record-keeping. All Macy's vendors are required to conform to the company's stringent Vendor/Supplier Code of Conduct that sets out specific standards and requirements for any vendor doing business with Macy's.

As for the other companies involved in the story—the Gap, Banana Republic, Urban Apparel, and Victoria's Secret—we've seen no similar statements so far.

"Macy's Goods Were Not Produced in Long Island City Sweatshop" [Marketwatch]
(Photo: Eddie~S)

]]>
Consumerist-5030917 Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:48:05 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5030917&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sweatshop In Queens Produced Clothes For Macy's, the Gap, Banana Republic, Urban Apparel, and Victoria's Secret ]]> New York state labor officials are bringing one of their largest cases ever against Jin Shun, a clothing factory in Queens, New York that employed Chinese immigrants. Inspectors say the company

  • cheated its workers out of more than $5 million in pay;
  • instructed workers to lie to state inspectors;
  • required 6 and 7-day workweeks, sometimes for up to 120 days at a time;
  • didn't pay overtime or minimum wage;
  • kept two sets of timecards to fake-out inspectors.
Macy's says they're "very concerned" about the case and are investigating it, the Gap says they're cooperating with authorities, and Victoria's Secret says they have a "zero tolerance policy" for factories that are unwilling to work with them to achieve compliance—all of which makes us wonder whether any of these companies ever investigated the factory personally. (It's not like it was in some remote part of China.)

Urban Apparel, which apparently faced a large inventory issue, took more practical steps:

The Labor Department announced that on Wednesday morning it placed special tags on more than 10,000 items of Jin Shun’s apparel, stating that the garments were produced under unlawful conditions.

Within hours of that tagging, the clothing company Urban Apparel paid state officials $60,000 to have the tags removed. The money covered the amount of wage violations that the department found had occurred when employees were making the tagged garments.

The factory, which was previously named Venture 47 and has recently been renamed Garlee NY, was quite blatant about lying to inspectors:

State officials said that the instructions given to employees, written in English and Mandarin, told them that if government inspectors ever asked them how many hours they worked each week, they were to respond, “Not sure, depends on the workload.”

The instructions told the workers that if inspectors asked how much they earned, they should respond, “I don’t remember, because sometimes I work more hours and sometimes less.”

The instruction sheet told the workers that if they were asked, “What is your hourly wage?” they were to answer, “Not sure, but always over $7.75 depending on the job complexity.” Even though the workers were paid at a fixed rate per piece of work performed and partly in cash, they were told to answer that they were always paid by the hour and through direct deposit.

You may be wondering how you can enforce your own anti-sweatshop policy when shopping, but of course without strict oversight from the big apparel companies, you're not left with many choices. One thing you can do is try to shop from companies that have taken a strong anti-sweatshop stance, such as American Apparel, or from companies like Busted Tees that use American Apparel shirts. Other than that, you have to rely on "made in ___" labels—Dana Thomas from Newsweek tells NPR that in general, U.S. labeling laws are far stricter than European and can be trusted more, but the Queens factory proves that's not always the case. You can also demand stronger oversight from officials and apparel companies—although how you "demand" such a thing is a rather good question.

"Apparel Factory Workers Were Cheated, State Says " [New York Times]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-5028582 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:48:32 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028582&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ J.Crew's New Website Does Everything Except Fulfill Orders Properly ]]> Kimberly, a frequent J.Crew online customer, placed an order on June 30th for five items from their newly revamped website. In the past, writes Kim, "it usually takes 2 days at the latest for me to receive any shipment that is not backordered." This time it's been 2 weeks, and not only has nothing arrived, but the UPS tracking number they've assigned her order is invalid (it doesn't even follow the UPS numbering style). The unhelpful J.Crew customer service rep told Kim that they had her correct address and to wait 10 days before calling back. In the meantime, one of the items has already been returned and refunded to Kim's credit card—although about $200 worth of merchandise has still been shipped to some as yet undiscovered location.

We know shipping accidents happen, but what's unacceptable about J.Crew's response is how they keep putting Kimberly off instead of working with her to resolve the problem.

My credit card was charged on the day of purchase for the full amount of my order. When I first called on the 8th the rep had suggested for me to wait the full 7 days, I did not have a problem then with the wait. On the 11th I checked their website and noticed the aforementioned status change that led to another call immediately.

I was refunded $49.99 on the same day on the item that was supposedly returned but I never received, but their rep did not even want to look up my address to see whether or not it was sent to the wrong address. When I insisted that he check, he told me that they had the correct shipping address but I should wait 10 days to call back anyways.

It's not like Kim's a novice shopper who doesn't know how shipping works. Now the question is: is there anyone at J.Crew who knows how shipping works? You two should talk.

]]>
Consumerist-5024947 Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:12:54 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5024947&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Steve & Barry's, the super cheap clothing ... ]]> Steve & Barry's, the super cheap clothing store that's like H&M with all the Euro-DNA removed, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Analysts say it has to do with declining credit markets throwing it into a liquidity crisis, higher commodities and fuel prices, and oh yeah, razor-thin margins on those $9 sneakers. [Marketwatch]

]]>
Consumerist-5023797 Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:17:45 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5023797&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Brooks Brothers Thanks Three-Week Old Infant For Requesting Their Catalogue. What? ]]> Reader Jillian thought she was keeping an eye on her three-week-old son, Benjamin, but apparently, he managed to sneak away and sign up for a Brooks Brothers catalog. As Jillian explains, "either I have a very preppie prodigy on my hands, or his name is already on a mailing list."

She sent us her polite letter to Brooks Brother's CEO:

Dear Mr Del Vecchio -

Today, I received a Brooks Brothers catalog in the mail, addressed to Benjamin James Tate-Booth (sic). Benjamin Tate-Boothe is my three-week old infant son. I assure you that he has no need of Brooks Brothers suits at this time, especially as he tends to soil garments quickly.

I am concerned at how your company gained my son's name and address in order to address an unsolicited catalog to him. The customer number present on the envelope is #004388918, and the accompanying letter states that a request for this catalog was placed. Brooks Brothers may have purchased his name from another mailing list, because I doubt Ben is signing up for clothing catalogs at such a tender age.

I am addressing this to your attention as your name is on the letter accompanying this catalog. I am hoping you will look into the source of Ben's catalog request, and stop any further unsolicited mail going to our address.

Sincerely,

Jillian

Who says this is a mistake? Stain-resistant ties! Maybe they come with matching bibs. Benjamin could charge them to his brand new American Express card, you know, once as he learns to scribble his name.

]]>
Consumerist-5022347 Sun, 06 Jul 2008 11:30:42 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5022347&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ CNN Goes Into Apparel Business With Headline T-Shirts ]]> con_frankshats30rock158.jpgMichael wrote in to point out that CNN has a weird new feature on its site—now you can proudly display your favorite, uh, headlines(?) on your body with their "CNN Shirt" service. It's beta, naturally, and they pick the headlines you can choose from—so no "What drove dad who kept 'house of horror'?" tee to shame your parents during the next family holiday. (That's the current top headline on their home page.)

Michael seemed as confused as us:

I'm not sure what to make of it. "Nominee for 2008 Stupidest Web 2.0 Idea" comes to mind, along with "something I'd expect from Fox News before CNN". Or maybe it's funny, if I enjoy walking around with "40-lb. hunk of metal hits driver in face" on my chest.
We think CNN is missing some good sales opportunities with their current paltry selection. After all, right there on the home page tonight are three very good potential t-shirt slogans under the Video section, going completely unused:
  • Sleepy bear can't stay awake
  • Baby found in house of filth
  • 7-minute battle with death

Update: Looks like CNN did tap "sleepy bear" and the "battle with death" slogans after all—but they messed them up with extra words.
 
Update 2: Ooo! Ooo! We want a t-shirt that says, "CNN Reporter Arrested With Meth And Sex Toy In Central Park" please, CNN.
 
CNN Shirt [CNN]
(Photo: "30 Rock"/NBC)

]]>
Consumerist-385505 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:52:29 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=385505&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Spreadshirt Inc. Spares Frat From Dressing Like Girly Men ]]> Alvin's sweatshirt order for his fraternity turned out a little too shimmery and girly. Alvin was solely responsible for the decision to order the "silver flex" font, and Spreadshirt could have easily told him that all sales were final. Instead, they reprinted the order for free.

Alvin writes:

I wanted to praise an online company that I happened to order custom printed apparel from. Spreadshirt Inc.or spreadshirt.com is one of many online services that customize shirts for a low price. I have used many of these sites because I graphic design on the side and enjoy putting some of my work on the clothes I wear. I want to let you know of the numerous sites I have used Spreadshirt has shown the greatest consideration of their customers. I made a mistake of getting one of my designs in a "silver" flex print which really ended up being a glittery reflective print. It made my fraternity letters look, lets say less manly. It was at my bad judgment but they were more than willing to redo it for me at no charge. I called them and left a message the night before and I am happy they were willing to call me back the next day. Hopefully, someone would recognize this great company too.
Nice work Spreadshirt! As for Alvin, we think his frat's pledge class would look just fab in the original sweatshirts. ]]>
Consumerist-379132 Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:30:04 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=379132&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Suspected Hat Stealer Drops Dead In Macy's ]]> con_hatallalone.jpg Last Thursday, a 400-pound man in his early thirties was confronted at a Macy's in Oakland, California, and accused of shoplifting a hat from the men's department. According to CBS News in San Francisco, "Security officers at the mall then attempted to arrest and detain Gomes, who allegedly resisted and assaulted security personnel, according to police." The police were called, but on their way to the mall they received a follow-up report that the man had become unresponsive. He died later that evening at a hospital.

Our question: can security personnel really arrest suspected shoplifters?

Go easy on the fat insults, y'all. The guy's dead.

"Dead shoplifter identified" [MercuryNews]
"Coroner ID's Suspect Who Collapsed At E. Bay Mall" [CBS5.com]
(Photo: Gato Azul)

]]>
Consumerist-373983 Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:53:49 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373983&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dog Fur Coats Sold By Dillards, Caché, ELUXURY, And DrJays ]]> Tanuki pleads for his life! The Humane Society has just released the results from another round of tests on fur-trimmed products from national U.S. retailers, and in four cases they found that the advertised "raccoon" fur was actually "raccoon dog," a canine indigenous to Asia. This is one case where the FTC is squarely to blame for creating the problem in the first place, because in 1951 they decided that trade trumps scientific classification and declared "that this animal should be referred to as 'Asiatic raccoon' in advertising and labeling."

If you are one of the many Americans who are opposed to real fur, the problem is obvious: you bought "faux fur" and received real. Or—if you are ok with some types of fur—you thought you were purchasing one species but instead took home a garment trimmed with fur from a species of dog.

But even if retailers and designers were to stop falsely advertising and labeling raccoon dog fur today, consumers would still be left with less than ideal information about what is really on the jacket they're purchasing.

That's because, despite "raccoon dog" being this animal's common name (that is, the non-Latin name which is generally used), the Federal Trade Commission inexplicably decided in 1951 that this animal should be referred to as "Asiatic raccoon" in advertising and labeling under the Fur Products Labeling Act.

So how do you keep from buying a dog fur coat? Well, here's the Humane Society's list of companies that have claimed they do not sell real fur products.

"Investigation Results Find Raccoon Dog Most Misrepresented Fur Sold in America" [Humane Society] (Thanks to Pierre!)
(Photo: hokkey)

]]>
Consumerist-370230 Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:49:52 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=370230&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Would You Take Your (Really Hot) Kid To The Abercrombie & Fitch Emergency Department And Trauma Center? ]]> The once-popular—surely it isn't still?—teenaged sexpot clothing store Abercrombie & Fitch is shelling out $10 million to build a new emergency room and trauma center at Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio. Now a group is speaking out against the idea of prominently naming the kids' ER after the store, which the hospital has been hinting at in announcements. The reason the hospital is called "Nationwide Children's Hospital" is because Nationwide Insurance gave it $50 million. Up next: the Budweiser End Zone Birthing Center, and then the American Apparel Teenaged Pregnancy Wing.

Research has shown a link between sexualized images of teens in the media and mental health problems in girls, including eating disorders, low self-esteem, anxiety and depression, according to the Boston-based Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood.

(Thanks to Darkwing Duck!)

"Group: Hospital should nix retailer name" [BusinessWeek/AP]
(Original photo before it got corrupted: D'Arcy Norman)

]]>
Consumerist-366668 Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:07:41 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=366668&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Bra Seller Tells Customer To Get A Breast Reduction ]]> con_smileyballoon.jpg If there's one thing this writer has learned over the years, it's to never tell a woman to get breast reduction surgery. It's rude, insulting, and can quite possibly get you kneed in the groin, slapped, pushed into a train, cut out of the will, and so on. But apparently the salesperson at Penningtons—sort of a Canadian Lane Bryant—didn't get that memo. "North of 49" writes:
I'm a woman of "ample girth" but still have a figure. At 226lbs, I have a 38J cup. We're getting married on leap day and I have had issues with bra shopping before. So I went to "Penningtons," an above average store that should have had bras in my size. They didn't.

Here's part of the email she sent to Penningtons' corporate offices:

I'm a bride to be and will be married on the 29th of this month. I am searching for a bra to wear with my dress and entered your store. First off, there was only one woman out on the floor, the other two were hiding in the back. I had to go to the woman at the cash registers and ask for help in order to get any.

The next part really hurt. Although she wanted to sell me a bra, she realized that at 38J, your store doesn't have any in my size or even near my size. In the ensuing conversation, she told me that I should have a reduction.

I have been on a waiting list since my now 5 and a half year old son was 10 months old. I was told that I would have to wait half a year or more after my children finally stop nursing before I could have a reduction. My youngest is 16 months and won't be giving up nursing anytime soon. This is entirely besides the point anyway, what she said was offensive and insulting to say the least.

To tell a customer to "get a reduction" when not only is day in question less than a month away, 20 days in fact, but to even suggest it is absurd and insulting. It has left me in tears and I will never walk through your store doors again no matter how good the sale seems.

It is hard enough to go bra hunting without being humiliated once again because the sizer thinks they know better. Or worse, to suggest that my body is inconvenient to them so I should change it surgically for their convenience.

Thanks a lot, Penningtons. Don't expect me to shop there anytime soon. And I will let all my friends know about how I was told to get a reduction.

We think the response from Penningtons was a step in the right direction, but it did little to make the customer feel better about what happened:
We appreciate your comments as they are important to us.
Okay, not that part. That part sounds fake. But it gets slightly better:
As you know, we pride ourselves in our customer service; therefore, we are very disappointed to hear that you had an unsatisfactory shopping experience in one of our stores.

The Director of Sales & Operations along with the District Sales Manager of this particular region needs to be advised in order to coach the employee in question to ensure that the service level meets our high standards.

Please provide us the store that this happened.

We hope to see you again in our stores.

I know this is not the reason you sent the email, but I would like to congratulate you on your upcoming wedding. I hope you have a beautiful day!

The customer points out that she had to sign up to their website to reach customer service, so they should have her personal info and know that there's only one Penningtons in her area. However, we were able to find their contact info on their website without registering so we're not sure their CSRs have access to personal account data.

So to "North of 49," we suggest you continue to communicate with the CSR who originally responded to you, and make it clear that you don't think this salesperson should be making such suggestions to customers. Their email seems halfway between a stock response and a sincere attempt to solve the problem, so do what you can to tip the scales in favor of "sincere attempt."

The best thing you can do with this situation is work with Penningtons to make sure they properly train their staff to avoid future incidents like yours; the worst is to come across as someone who can't be pleased, because then they might disregard the very real problem you encountered.

(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-358414 Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:18:18 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=358414&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Men's Wearhouse Can't Help You, Get Out ]]> We can't help you. I guarantee it. Clint at Seattlest went shopping for a suit for his wedding. The wedding isn't until August, but he and his beyonce just wanted to see what Men's Wearhouse had to offer. Mostly, they had to offer a really rude sales clerk who told them to get out of her store and come back in the summer when they were ready to shop.

"B" is the sales lady, and "S" is Seattlest:

B: What color do you want? Grey? Black?

S: Brown, actually.

B: Brown. That's a different choice for a wedding.

S: That's the idea.

B: Light brown? Dark brown? Tan?

S: Dark brown.

Bitchy pulls out a black pinstriped suit and brandishes it at us.

B: This is dark brown. Is this what you're thinking?

It isn't. It's black.

S: Well, not really.

con_thisparrotisnotdead.jpg
B: It's dark brown. But we won't have this in August.

She hangs the suit again and stares at us.

Seriously, sales clerk? You work at Men's Wearhouse and have this attitude? This writer has personally hated Men's Wearhouse ever since an aggressive employee tried to physically intimidate me into buying a jacket I didn't like back in 2006. It was my second and last time to ever enter one of their stores. Oh, also their suits are gross.

(Thanks to James!)

"Men's Wearhouse Presents: How to Lose Customers and (Negatively) Influence Sales" [Seattlest]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-352123 Mon, 04 Feb 2008 10:01:15 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=352123&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ And now we pause for a bit of shopping schedenfraude: ... ]]> cokehead.jpgAnd now we pause for a bit of shopping schedenfraude: Kate Moss' collection is now "heavily discounted" at Barney's. Can one sustain a coke habit at 50% off? [Barney's via Racked]

]]>
Consumerist-335401 Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:44:47 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=335401&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sales Of Women's Clothing Drops, May Mean Steep Discounts Over The Next Week ]]> con_germanwindowdisplay.jpg Mastercard reported on Sunday that, after a slight bump around Black Friday, sales of women's clothing has dropped again, down 6% even while sales of men's clothing has gone up 4.5%. They think it has to do with an overall weak year for women's fashion, and the fact that mothers tend to cut back on new clothes for themselves first when faced with a tighter budget. The silver lining: there may be considerable discounts at women's clothing retailers in the immediate future as they try to bump up sales at the last minute.

The drop-off, which the credit card company described Sunday as "surprising," bodes poorly for chains like Chico's FAS and Ann Taylor, which specialize in women's clothing, and could result in steeper-than-expected discounts on their merchandise in the final week before Christmas.
"Retailers Face an Ominous Holiday Sign" [New York Times] (Photo: Scurzuzu) ]]>
Consumerist-335118 Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:10:38 EST Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=335118&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Sales Of Women's Clothing Down, Bargains Are Coming ]]> The New York Times says that sales of women's apparel, usually a staple of the holiday season, are down 6% so far this season.

Expect some bargains as the shopping season wears down:

The drop-off, which the credit card company described Sunday as "surprising," bodes poorly for chains like Chico's FAS and Ann Taylor, which specialize in women's clothing, and could result in steeper-than-expected discounts on their merchandise in the final week before Christmas.

"Even when the dust settles, it is likely to be one of the weakest categories in retail this season," said John D. Morris, senior retail analyst at Wachovia Securities.

Men looking for similar deals will be out of luck. Sales of men's clothing are up 4%.

So why are sales of women's clothing down? Hmm, could it be the fugly clothes? Or maybe you're broke? What do you think?


Retailers Face an Ominous Holiday Sign
[New York Times] (Thanks, Molly!)
(Photo:mainfr4me)

]]>
Consumerist-334519 Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:01:35 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=334519&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Old Navy Recalls Boy's Jacket, Offers $5 Gift Card ]]> This Old Navy boys windbreaker has a waist drawstring, a big "no no" according to the CPSC's children's clothing safety guidelines. You can either cut the drawstring out, or return the jacket to Old Navy for a full refund and get a $5 gift card for your trouble, meaning you've essentially been paid $5 to let your kid to wear a jacket.

For additional information, contact Old Navy at (866) 580-9930 between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m. ET Monday through Friday, Saturday between 12 p.m. and 7 p.m. ET, and Sunday between 12 p.m. and 6 p.m. ET, email custserv@oldnavy.com, or visit www.oldnavy.com.


Old Navy Recalls Boys' Jackets; Drawstring at Waist Poses Entrapment Hazard
[CPSC]

]]>
Consumerist-329760 Tue, 04 Dec 2007 12:11:50 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=329760&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Is Express Taxing Tax-Exempt Items? ]]> An Express in New York City charged a sharp-eyed reader tax on a belt that cost $34.50. Neither the city nor state levy tax on items costing less than $110.

According to the State of New York:

Effective September 1, 2007, Clothing and footwear worn by humans and costing less than $110 per item is exempt from the 4% New York State sales and use tax. This exemption does not apply to any locally imposed sales and use tax, unless the county or city imposing the tax elects to provide for it.

Effective September 1, 2007, recently enacted legislation (Chapter 82 of the Laws of 2007) provides that all clothing, footwear, and items used to make or repair clothing (hereinafter "clothing and footwear") are exempt from the 4% New York City local sales and use taxes, regardless of the cost. However, sales in New York City of clothing and footwear costing $110 or more per item or pair remain subject to the 4% New York State sales and use taxes and the ⅜% sales and use taxes imposed by the State in the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation District (MCTD).

The 8.375% sales tax cost our reader an extra $2.89. He writes:
On Saturday I purchased a belt at Express here in NYC. They charged me sales tax.

There is no sales tax on Clothing under $110 per Item. Belts included. The store would not refund my money.

I filed a complaint with New York State Dept Of Tax and Finance (800) 698-2909.

I also complained to Express Corporate office (614) 415-4633.

After filing the complaint Express has agreed to refund me the tax $2.89

http://consumerist.com/assets/resources/2007/11/rec-thumb.jpgCome on Express, the revised tax code is so in season.

Sales Tax Clothing and Footwear - Permanent Exemption Information [State of New York]

]]>
Consumerist-328849 Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:10:14 EST Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=328849&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Gap Responds To Child Slave Labor Scandal ]]> The Gap has pledged $200,000 to to improve working conditions in India, where only some forms of child labor are outlawed, and it also promised to tighten its own standards. The retailer canceled half of its orders with the vendor in India that was responsible for subcontracting the workshop in which children who had been sold to the factory were working off the debt by embroidering clothing for Gap Kids.

NPR talks with Amelia Gentleman, the New Delhi bureau chief for the International Herald Tribune. She's visited illegal embroidery workshops where children put in 16 hour days sewing sequins onto clothing and are paid about $2.50 a day. She says that even though the story got a lot of media coverage, there hasn't been much of a push to close the workshops down.

"There are so many of these workshops in the streets of central Delhi, just freely visible, and in the immediate aftermath of this Observer expose, which was very heavily reported here, there didn't seem to be any large scale police action to try and shut these workshops down."

She says that some companies, like IKEA, get it right. IKEA not only inspects factories, but also farms where cotton for its textiles are grown.

Gap Pledges Better Work Conditions in India [NPR]

]]>
Consumerist-325003 Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:19:39 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=325003&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How Often Do Companies Check On Overseas Manufacturers? ]]> con_sweatshop.jpg With the Gap embarrassed this week by reports that Indian children as young as 10 were making Gap Kids clothing, a lot of people are asking, just how frequently and to what degree do large U.S. companies like Gap and Wal-Mart monitor their foreign manufacturers? According to Slate, "anywhere from six months to once every several years." Unfortunately, because the visits are usually announced ahead of time, factories can hide violations, coach employees on what to say, get rid of the child workers, and forge records. In China, there are consultants who will prepare a factory for inspection, going so far as to fake missing records.

The Gap, Nike, and Levi Strauss actually have comparatively large inspection teams for U.S. companies, but "large" in this sense means about 90 inspectors for the Gap—the number of inspections-per-plant for the Gap in 2006 still worked out to about one every six months.

The current inspection process has only been around since the early to mid-90s, and clearly the current level of inspections aren't working:

A forthcoming study from the Worker Rights Consortium examined 50 factories serving these top companies and found major problems at each location, like verbal abuse, lack of access to drinking water and bathrooms, and the inability for workers to organize. In 84 percent of those factories, workers didn't understand how their salary was determined.

"Checking on Sweatshops" [Slate]
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-317882 Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:38:54 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=317882&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Amy Poehler And Will Arnett Attempt To Save The Gap ]]> According to OK! magazine, Amy Poehler of Saturday Night Live and husband, Will Arnett, from Arrested Development are the latest celebrities to attempt to save the GAP by wearing its clothing in advertisements.

Will it work? The last batch of celebs to try to rescue the brand included Kyra Sedgwick and Chris O'Donnell, whom, we can only assume, were located with the same time machine GAP uses to design its clothes.

OK! Sneak Peek: Amy Poehler's New Gap Ad [OK!]

]]>
Consumerist-317378 Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:36:37 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=317378&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Tommy Hilfiger Only Available At Macy's ]]> tommy.jpgMacy's and designer Tommy Hilfiger have reached a deal that will make the store Hilfiger's exclusive "department store" retailer.

"It will increase the number of Hilfiger shops in high-volume Macy's stores, renovate and upgrade existing shops and feature Hilfiger collections in its marketing campaigns," according to CNNMoney.

Tommy Hilfiger will still operate its own free-standing stores and sell merchandise on its website, but the rest belongs to Macy's. Is Tommy Hilfiger still cool? Macy's thinks so:

"This is a very big deal for us," the chief executive of Macy's, Terry J. Lundgren, told the New York Times. "Tommy is very significant brand."

Whatever you say, Terry. Ours is not to reason why.

Macy's and Hilfiger Strike Exclusive Deal [New York Times]
Macy's enters agreement with Tommy Hilfiger [CNNMoney]

]]>
Consumerist-315627 Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:13:50 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=315627&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Target To Offer David Bowie Themed Clothes. Sadly, No Sequined Jumpsuits, Not Designed By Bowie ]]> "British musician-turned-designer Keanan Duffty" has designed a line of David Bowie-themed mens wear for Target, according to a press release that reads like an acceptance speech:

Bowie has inspired Duffty since childhood and, through his music, taught the designer to experiment across different creative mediums. Duffty applies this lesson to his eclectic encore collection that debuts on October 14 at most Target stores and at Target.com. ... Several of the collection's key pieces draw direct inspiration from characters and songs by David Bowie. The tuxedo, vest and pants were inspired by David's Thin White Duke persona, the song "Station to Station" and his most recent album "Reality." The dress shirts and trench coat are references to David's first movie role as Thomas Jerome Newton in "The Man Who Fell to Earth." In addition, the gray button-down shirt features Bowie's "Let's Dance" lyrics scripted onto the fabric.

"David Bowie has always brought left field ideas to mainstream pop culture and has defined his own unique aesthetic and personality," Duffty said. "Target strives to bring creativity and individuality to its guests, making this collection a perfect fit."

For an extra $5 you can get a Bowie compilation CD along with your "Thin White Duke persona." We know what we're going to be for Halloween!

Rock legend David Bowie is inspiration behind limited-edition mens collection (Press Release) [Target via BuzzFeed]
(Photo:Target)

]]>
Consumerist-310266 Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:55:03 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=310266&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Southwest (Finally) Apologizes To Mini-Skirted Customer ]]> whitedenim.jpgSouthwest Airlines has finally condescended to apologize to the mini-skirted customer that it tried to kick off a flight...

Self-confessed "PR lover" and Southwest CEO Greg Kelly said:

"From a Company who really loves PR, touche to you Kyla! Some have said we've gone from wearing our famous hot pants to having hot flashes at Southwest, but nothing could be further from the truth. As we both know, this story has great legs, but the true issue here is that you are a valued Customer, and you did not get an adequate apology. Kyla, we could have handled this better, and on behalf of Southwest Airlines, I am truly sorry. We hope you continue to fly Southwest Airlines. Our Company is based on freedom even if our actions may have not appeared that way. It was never our intention to treat you unfairly and again, we apologize."

Southwest also took this opportunity to launch something called "Mini-skirt fares." Not kidding. Being serious.

Southwest Airlines Issues an Apology and Lowers Fares to Match Now Infamous Mini Skirt (Press Release)

]]>
Consumerist-300185 Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:25:01 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=300185&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ You don't have to spend $30 at Petco to ... ]]> con_tinydoginsocksweaterhat.jpg You don't have to spend $30 at Petco to gussy up your small dog in embarrassing winter wear, says the MAKE blog. Just find an old argyle sock and follow their simple, six-cut pattern. Warning: it makes a hat, too! [makezine.com]

]]>
Consumerist-299808 Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:46:03 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=299808&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Tips For Shopping At Thrift Stores ]]> con_shirtsatthriftstore.jpg Sometimes it seems like thrift stores are on the verge of extinction. What used to be a necessity for college students, "alternative" types, artists, and practical moms have mostly been replaced by "super-low prices" at big box stores, or dirt-cheap fashions from retailers like H&M, Steve & Barry's, or Old Navy. Still, if you've got the time and the right attitude, and you're okay with that vintage/hand-me-down look, you can find some good bargains at thrift stores.

In true second-hand fashion, we've collected a bin's worth of suggestions on how to maximize your thrift store shopping, added a few of our own, and thrown it all together in no particular order:


  • Go often - turnover is high in thrift stores.
  • Shop for quality - learn how to spot vintage linens, original recordings, depression glass, or whatever it is you're interested in.
  • Take your time - more than normal retail, thrift stores reward shoppers willing to spend half an hour going through a long rack of clothes item-by-item.
  • Try on clothing at the store - and wear something easy to change in and out of, or something you can pull clothes over in case there's no dressing room. If it's cold outside, leave your coat in your car.
  • Test all electronics on-site - carry common batteries with you if you're looking at used consumer electronics or toys that are battery operated.
  • Factor in the cost/trouble of delivering any furniture you purchase - most thrift stores won't deliver.
  • Decide on a category before you enter - don't shop for books and clothes; focus on one thing exclusively
  • When clothes shopping, learn to look for color, then texture, then style. Also, learn to identify material by sight. This way you can use color and texture (and fabric type) to quickly identify pieces you'll want to actually pull off the rack to inspect further.
  • Avoid the temptation to make clothing-related jokes while you shop - yes, that Mr. Furley blazer is hilarious, but now you've wasted another 30 seconds in a store that smells like a basement.
  • If you suffer from severe allergies, stick to Wal-Mart. Many thrift stores are filled with dust or worse, and can wreak havoc on allergies.
  • Take water to drink - it will help alleviate any reactions you do have to dustmites or mold.
  • Eat before you go.
  • Use the bathroom before you go.
  • If you want to avoid crowds, try evenings.

To see each full list of advice, click the Related links below.

RELATED
"Tips for Thrift Store Shopping" [Associated Content]
"Thrift Store Shopping Basics" [Associated Content]
"How to Shop Well for Clothes in a Thrift Store" [WikiHow]
"Thrift Store Shopping" [The Sideroad]
(Photo: Chris Walters)

]]>
Consumerist-298824 Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:45:32 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=298824&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ New Zealand TV Program Says Chinese-Made Children's Clothes Are Contaminated With Formaldehyde ]]> Formaldehyde.jpgThe New Zealand Ministry of Consumer Affairs is investigating claims made by a New Zealand television program that Chinese-made children's clothes are contaminated with formaldehyde. The consumer watchdog program tested woolen and cotton clothes after receiving a complaint that a child had suffered an allergic reaction.

The tests concluded that some clothes had concentrations of formaldehyde 900 times the "level that causes harm." Formaldehyde is used as a preservative and as an embalming fluid and may cause cancer. From the Washington Post:

"Target" production manager Juanita Dobson said the garments tested were "randomly selected items" that are "readily available from common outlets round New Zealand."

"We are not releasing further details" of brand names or importers ahead of the show airing on Tuesday, she told The Associated Press.

A woman with the media office of China's General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, who gave only her surname Xia, said she had not heard of the New Zealand case. The administration is China's product safety watchdog.

People who answered phones at the China National Garment Association and the China Textile Industry Association also said they had not heard of the case.

The program's director, Candace McNabb, says the lab was shocked by how high the level of contamination was:
"We were tipped off by a consumer who contacted us because her son had bought 100 per cent cotton pants and had an allergic reaction to them," she said.

"So we started looking into the types of chemicals that are used in production and manufacture of clothing and treatments that they receive along the way. For example, something like formaldehyde is used to prevent mould and mildew, things like that."

"Quite often we hear about formaldehyde in building materials and things like that, so it was quite hard to find out what it would mean on clothing, but basically there are worries about it being cancer-causing and things like that.

"The laboratory we spoke to was really surprised at the results and actually went back and double-checked that they'd done everything right because our results were so high."

NZ Investigates China Clothes Imports [Washington Post]
NZ tests find formaldehyde in Chinese-made clothes [ABC News, Australia]
(Photo:Getty)

]]>
Consumerist-291410 Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:59:39 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=291410&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dear New Gap CEO: Here's How To Fix Your Stores ]]> glenngap.jpgA while back we asked the readers to tell us what was wrong with Gap, INC. Since we asked, they've sh*tcanned their CEO, closed a chain of stores, launched new ad campaigns featuring celebrities, rethought their merchandise and...nothing has has helped.

The business continues to hemorrhage money. Starting today Gap, INC. has yet another new CEO, and this one has no apparel experience.

Here at Consumerist, we're pro-success. In the spirit of a new beginning, we thought we'd let Glenn "Stop The Bleeding" Murphy, Gap's new CEO, know what he needs to do to fix the Gap.

These comments were all written by you, the shopper. If Glenn wants to turn it around, he'd better listen up.

How To Fix The Gap

by The Customers Of The Gap

  • "Stop charging so much for the same shit you sell at old navy for 50% of the price."

  • "Old Navy/Gap seem to have boring clothes, costing more than the more interesting things I find elsewhere. I'd rather have a clearance designer shirt from Lord & Taylor, than an overpriced plain t-shirt from The Gap."

  • It seems to me to be a combination of allowing Old Navy to sell extremely similar items for much less and also offering a selection that pales in comparison to that same store. Though I have to say, I've been enjoying my Old Navy options less and less these past couple of years, and the quality has seemed to decline dramatically. Perhaps that's why Old Navy isn't doing that well either.

  • The prices are high for teens and young adults without the cachet of the Abercrombie or AE or BR label/logo. For the last few seasons, they have featured a lot of boring colors. Tans, washed-out stuff, browns, blah. Plus, I can get a similar polo shirt for a fraction of the price (for my sons) at Old Navy.

  • You can try on 6 different pairs of the same jeans in the same size, length and cut and all 6 pairs will fit differently - that kind of piss-poor quality control is why I stopped shopping at the Gap. The marketing onslaught for skinny jeans when maybe .01% of the female population actually look good in them sealed the deal. (I stopped shopping at Old Navy as well when it became clear that ultra-ultra-ultra low-rise was their starting point). I guess I'm at the age where I realize that shelling out $50 for crappy fitting clothes makes less financial sense than shelling out $80 for clothes that fit well and will stand the test of time.

  • The only reason to shop there is to be able to brag to someone else that I got this at the Gap! Same shit for half the price at Target. Plus I do most of my cloths shopping twice a year at Costco. Name brand CK, Polo, Ralph Lauren etc. and the most expensive items are still under $30.00 there.

  • I've found that the jeans I've bought there in the past went threadbare before Levi's of a similar age would have been broken in. Also bought the only shirts I've ever managed to wear out the elbow of, while working a desk job.

  • Last time I went into a Gap store there seemed to be about twenty employees there.

    None of whom seemed to want to help me, despite my polite requests.

  • Low-quality fabrics, unflattering cuts, boring clothes. Also, they still make flare jeans (I'm not talking boot-cut, which are fine, but like bad retro flare). Too many whiskers and such on them as well.

  • The whole sweatshop thing bothered me when it broke a few years ago, and aside from getting $5-10 shirts and pants from the sales rack, the stuff is far overpriced.

    I have a hard time shopping there without a guilty conscience.

  • the fit at everything at the gap is RIDICULOUS! the "small" clothing has larger measurements than a "large" at clothing companies that are doing well, like american apparel. everything at the gap is short, wide, and has a "belly pouch" sewn in (ie, extra fabric so that giant bellies can hang loose). the only clothing that is fitted somewhat well with a range of sizes and fits is the women's pants.

  • Why shop at The Gap when I can get the same quality (and better work clothes styles) at Old Navy? Or when I can go some place like Macy's or Nordstrom's and pay the same amount for better quality?

    On a related note, I had to laugh a few months back when they raised the prices on their skirts ~$10 and had them "on sale" for the old price.

  • I love the Gap's clothes. I hate the Gap's prices.
    We all know that the third-world value of those clothes are like $7 — why charge $79.99 for a fucking sweater?

  • I think the GAP has just lost its way. The GAP started as a place for everyone to shop-it was the place to bridge the generation gap. It offered basic, good quality clothes that most anyone could and would wear at reasonable prices.

    Now they don't seem to know who they are, half of the clothes are too young and too trendy and the other half are really boring and frumpy. And all of them are far too expensive relative to the quality and what you find at other stores.

    I also think there are just too many GAP stores - there is absolutely nothing special about going into a GAP, it's about as special as a neighborhood gas station.

  • To me, everything they sell in the GAP looks like something I might have worn or considered cute back in 1992.

  • Frankly, the middle market is disappearing. Just as the gap between rich and poor widens, most consumers are shopping either significantly more upmarket or more downmarket. There were actually days when wearing clothes from the GAP was really very hip, and the clothes were not any more expensive than they are today.

    Nowadays, the cachet clothes cost easily two or three times more than comparable clothes from the GAP. Consumers with the cash are shopping at higher end labels, and consumers with less money are not going to shell out money that will stretch their finances for brands that do not have the cachet they once held. They'll buy clothes from Old Navy, H&M, or Zara.

  • I lost faith the day they hired Sarah Jessica Parker to shill the Gap.

    Her face looks like a foot.

  • I worked at an Old Navy for two years, and during that time, I only used my employee discount to buy things at Gap. Why? Because Old Navy's jeans felt like sandpaper and their graphic tees (which are basically the only kind of shirt I wear) looked like they were designed by a 12-year-old who just learned Photoshop.

  • As a 29 year old female who does a lot of shopping, I have to say the Gap is one boring ass place to shop.

  • As for Old Navy....my cousin bought me a nice blue sweater with a red stripe running horizontally across the chest. Two washes later the red stripe ran pink and red all over the sweater. I'll stick to Macy's and JC Penny's.

  • I hate the Gap and Old Navy because, as several other people have noted, they plaster their names/logos all over their shirts (especially Old Navy) and I'll be damned if I'm going to pay for the privilege of serving as a walking billboard for a multinational corporation.

  • I hate the Gap because of that BS Audrey Hepburn commercial. That, and the Lyrcra in everything. Just try to buy a pair of non-Lycra jeans at the Gap. I dare you.

To Summarize (We know CEOs are busy):

Gap sells boring, low quality clothes at prices that are not competitive. The customer service is poor. The materials used are substandard compared to what can be purchased for the same amount of money at other retailers. The sizes are inconsistent. The styles are either boring or too trendy with nothing in between.

The brand isn't well-regarded, and is not worth paying a premium to own. Gap, INC. logos on clothing are embarrassing to wear. The spokespeople are annoying.

Sounds like you have your work cut out for you, Glenn. Good luck!

]]>
Consumerist-283381 Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:49:22 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=283381&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Shoppers Hate Skinny Jeans: Walmart Apparel Chief Resigns ]]> walmarttruck.jpgLet's face it. Your average body-type does not look good in tapered-leg skinny jeans. We're not even saying "average body type" as code for "fatty." We actually mean it. Regular people look bad in these fashions and do not want to purchase cheap Walmart versions of them. People want to buy socks at Walmart. Big bags of socks.

We know this, but Walmart's Apparel Chief Claire A. Watts didn't. She's resigned from her position after Walmart's attempt to snag some of the trendy clothes market failed miserably.

From the Washington Post:

Watts's duties will be split between Mark Larsen, who oversaw merchandise for babies, children and men, and Dottie Mattison, who worked for Walmart.com.

Marshal Cohen, a senior analyst with consumer research firm NPD Group, said Watts's departure did not mean that fashion was dead at Wal-Mart. But he said the retailer needed to refocus on the desires of its core customers rather than chase after trendsetters.

Watts had pushed Walmart's trendy line "Metro 7" into 1500 stores nationwide. The skinny pants and slutty tops confused and frightened shoppers who were there looking for toilet paper and huge jars of pickles.

Wal-Mart's Fashion Maven Departs As Trendy Merchandise Languishes [Washington Post]
(Photo:ashcroft54)

]]>
Consumerist-281057 Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:47:59 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=281057&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Bikini's Tumultuous History ]]> Bikini.jpgBikinis were not always fit for toddlers; though they were accepted by the ancient Romans, bikinis made waves when they first appeared on the modern market, according to a slideshow essay from Slate:
    "When the bikini first arrived, its revealing cut scandalized even the French fashion models who were supposed to wear it; they refused, and the original designer had to enlist a stripper instead."

The very origin of the name "bikini" is tied to the nuclear tests conducted on Bikini Atoll, which explains why attractive bikini-clad ladies were known as "bombshells." So next time your significant other salaciously eyes a bikini, let him off the hook - he is merely appreciating history.

The Right To Bare Tummies [Slate]
(Photo: Todd Ehlers)

]]>
Consumerist-275927 Sat, 07 Jul 2007 10:26:05 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=275927&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ String Bikinis: Now Available for Toddlers! ]]> bikini.jpgThe Arizona Republic is reporting that Gap Kids now offers a crochet string bikini for 1 year-olds. What?
GapKids recently featured a white, crocheted string bikini you'd likely see Anna Kournikova wearing on the cover of the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue. The bikini was for a 12-month-old.

Racks at Target held several bathing suits perfect for a Hawaiian Tropic bikini competition. The crocheted and camouflage-designed suits started at Size 4 in the little girls' section.

Inseams on "classic" shorts at stores such as Abercrombie Kids and Hollister Co. are microscopic. And halter tops, shirts often lauded by fashion consultants for their ability to enhance a less-than-voluptuous chest, are everywhere for every age.

Moms hoping to find anything even mildly modest have to be happy Bermuda shorts are trendy again.

We don't have kids or (much) younger sisters or nieces or anything, so we have no idea if this article is exaggerating, but it claims that parents are resorting to sewing their children's clothes themselves because they can't find non-slutty duds for their elementary school kids. Is this true?

Exasperation rises as suggestive clothes for girls spread from teens to toddlers [Arizona Republic]
(Photo: Gap Kids Bikini, Available For Girls 35lbs 41")

]]>
Consumerist-273272 Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:29:58 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=273272&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ How To Unshrink Wool ]]> It's actually very easy to unshrink a wool garment you shrank in the wash.

1. Place the wool item in a sink full of warm water.
2. Soak for 10 minutes.
3. Remove the item and squeeze out excess water.
4. Let dry on a towel.
5. Carefully stretch and pull the item back to its original shape. Voila!

Why are we talking about wool in the summer? Because we recently threw our smelly winter cap in the wash and it came out a kitty-cat chapeau. Bookmark this tip in your brain for the next time you forget to read your wool item's care label. — BEN POPKEN

References: StyleBites, The Gazette

]]>
Consumerist-267551 Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:48:12 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=267551&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Clothing Makers Sue The Government Over Gender-Based Tariffs ]]> Under%20The%20Suit%2C%20He%27s%20Scared.jpgSeveral clothing makers, including Steve Madden, Asics and Columbia Sportswear are suing the government over discriminatory gender-based tariffs. For example, Congress levies a 28% tariff on men's bathing suits, but only a 12% tariff on women's bathing suits.
If the clothing companies prevail, they could reclaim close to $1 billion worth of tariffs based on gender differences. For example, the lawsuit claims that the government earned $2.5 million last year from discriminatory tariffs on underpants (penalizing women), $93 million for cotton shirts (penalizing men), $16 million for silk shirts (penalizing women) and $71 million for shoes with leather tops (women again).
Tariffs are the quiet cousin of taxes; you seldom see a charge for tariffs, though they are factored into the cost of a wide array items manufactured overseas. To make the suit moot, the government may equalize tariffs at the higher level, which would hurt clothing makers and consumers alike. — CAREY GREENBERG-BERGER

In Apparel, All Tariffs Aren't Created Equal [NYT] (Thanks to Sacha!)
(Photo: huxleyesque)

]]>
Consumerist-256234 Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:38:23 EDT Carey http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=256234&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Nice Ties From Cyberoptix ]]> Check out these snazzy hand screen-printed ties from Cyberoptix.

We're partial to the Ghostly International, poppies, and ex-libris.

The ties go for $30 or $40, depending on whether you choose poly-blend or black or white 100% charmeuse silk tie.

These ties are the perfect way to say, "I'm hip, AND I have I job." — BEN POPKEN

Cyberboptix [via Murketing]

]]>
Consumerist-233448 Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:13:37 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=233448&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ More Crap About The GAP ]]> Time has an analysis of what went wrong at the GAP and it echoes many of the comments we got on this site:
Pressler's penny-pinching may have turned off the Gap's core customers. Sweaters that were once 100% cotton or wool, for example, showed up in stores as acrylic blends, and people noticed. Banana Republic tried to woo the same high-end consumers as J. Crew but didn't go far enough in offering luxury fabrics, like cashmere, that those shoppers wanted. In 2005, while department stores couldn't sell enough $100-plus premium jeans, the Gap skipped denim and tried to push khakis. "Pressler went too far in focusing on costs at the expense of merchandising," says Christine Chen, senior research analyst at Pacific Growth Equities. "Sometimes you just need to go with your gut and do what makes sense to get customers in the door."
The article also mentions the way in which stores like H&M refresh their looks faster, drawing in and keeping customers in their 20s and 30s. By the time a look hits the GAP, it's already over, and possibly expensive for the store and unflattering for the customer (skinny jeans?)—MEGHANN MARCO

Why The GAP Keeps Getting Crushed [TIME]

]]>
Consumerist-231894 Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:09:54 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=231894&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Walmart: First Holiday Sales Slump in a Decade. ]]> Walmart is announcing its first November sales slump in a decade, "In a season of what has been pretty healthy numbers from retailers, Wal-Mart has been lackluster, to say the least," said Adrianne Shapira, an analyst at Goldman Sachs. "Houston, there is a problem."

Lame jokes from Goldman Sachs aside: What the hell is wrong with Walmart?

The Times lists several possibilities, including the fact that in a world where Walmart's average customer is "5-foot-2 and wears a size 14" Walmart expanded its "urban" clothing line—featuring tapered, tight-fitting skinny jeans. Bad idea.

And then there's the whole layaway thing:

"By ending layaway plans, which allowed low-income shoppers to make purchases in installments, the chain freed up the store space and employees.But it also upset shoppers like Michele Kahindi, a 30-year-old mother of three who lives in Portland, Ore.

Eliminating the program "hinders a mom's ability to hide stuff from the kids," she said. "I don't get it. Now Kmart is going to get my layaway business."

Meanwhile, Target is growing by leaps and bounds... stealing Walmart's customers and not giving them back. —MEGHANN MARCO(Thanks, jp!)

Wal-Mart Trips as It Changes a Bit Too Fast
[New York Times]

]]>
Consumerist-218272 Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:42:52 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=218272&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Like.com Finds What You Like ]]> Like.com is a brand-new search engine that allows you to search by looking at shoes and accessories featured in celebrity photos. Sounds lame, and it is, until you realize that you can draw a box around the exact part of the featured accessory you like... and like.com searches for other products that have that same feature.

Like the toes of Tyra's boots but not the heel? Draw a box around the toes and see what like.com comes up with. For us, it found lots of similar (and cheaper) boots on stores like amazon.com.

Cool idea. The site is still in "alpha", but we think this has a lot of promise. The celebs available for imitation are pretty weak...who tries to look like Britney Spears?...but we're looking forward to the future. For more info, The Wall Street Journal has a detailed review of Like.com here.— MEGHANN MARCO

Where to Find a Famous Look [wsj.com]

]]>
Consumerist-213568 Thu, 09 Nov 2006 09:41:52 EST Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=213568&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Smell of Discount Designer Duds Like Sweet Puke ]]> The prospect of crazy fashion deals is usually considered "sick" as in "sweet" as in "bad like early Michael Jackson good."

However, for one skinny, blond publishing industry worker, a past shopping trauma causes a tickle in her olfactories. Now every Century 21 bag she encounters smells like vomit.

Aside: you'll have to forgive us and supply your own imagination caps for, try as we might, we failed to find the perfect picture to illustrate this post's "concept."

In creating her Pavlovian puke connection, she sacrificed reduced-priced cashmere and last season's Pucci for a misplaced piece of pride. Dignity is for sale in Manhattan, but you have to pay the right price. And usually the transaction doesn't take place in the back of a taxi.

Usually.

"Things That Make Me Nauseous: Century 21" [via Gawker]

]]>
Consumerist-171678 Thu, 04 May 2006 17:16:44 EDT popkin http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=171678&view=rss&microfeed=true