<![CDATA[Consumerist: Catalogs]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/consumerist.com.png <![CDATA[Consumerist: Catalogs]]> http://consumerist.com/tag/catalogs http://consumerist.com/tag/catalogs <![CDATA[ J.Crew Apologizes For Bad Website, But That's All They Do ]]> A dozen readers (and probably a couple of PR flacks) must have forwarded us J.Crew's email today, in which the CEO and president of the company extend a mutual apology for the non-workingness of their "enhanced" website and call center. Oddly, the email simply asks customers to "bear with us" but doesn't offer any discount or sale. Well, maybe they figured driving more traffic to a broken site would only make things worse.

]]>
Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:47:04 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5031259&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ L.L. Bean Backpacks Are For Trusting Souls ]]> Reader j. sent us the above scan of a page from an L.L. Bean catalog. j. says:

Look where L L Bean advises you to keep your phones and gadgets!

They're such trusting souls, storing their gadgets outside their backpacks for the whole world to steal. No wonder this is probably the worst complaint we've ever gotten about L.L. Bean. They're obviously just too nice. Good for them.

]]>
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:04:47 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5026208&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ J.Crew's New Website Does Everything Except Fulfill Orders Properly ]]> Kimberly, a frequent J.Crew online customer, placed an order on June 30th for five items from their newly revamped website. In the past, writes Kim, "it usually takes 2 days at the latest for me to receive any shipment that is not backordered." This time it's been 2 weeks, and not only has nothing arrived, but the UPS tracking number they've assigned her order is invalid (it doesn't even follow the UPS numbering style). The unhelpful J.Crew customer service rep told Kim that they had her correct address and to wait 10 days before calling back. In the meantime, one of the items has already been returned and refunded to Kim's credit card—although about $200 worth of merchandise has still been shipped to some as yet undiscovered location.

We know shipping accidents happen, but what's unacceptable about J.Crew's response is how they keep putting Kimberly off instead of working with her to resolve the problem.

My credit card was charged on the day of purchase for the full amount of my order. When I first called on the 8th the rep had suggested for me to wait the full 7 days, I did not have a problem then with the wait. On the 11th I checked their website and noticed the aforementioned status change that led to another call immediately.

I was refunded $49.99 on the same day on the item that was supposedly returned but I never received, but their rep did not even want to look up my address to see whether or not it was sent to the wrong address. When I insisted that he check, he told me that they had the correct shipping address but I should wait 10 days to call back anyways.

It's not like Kim's a novice shopper who doesn't know how shipping works. Now the question is: is there anyone at J.Crew who knows how shipping works? You two should talk.

]]>
Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:12:54 EDT Chris Walters http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5024947&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ BBB Complaint Gets Dell To Pledge To Stop Sending Catalogs ]]>

Two Fridays ago I filed a Better Business Bureau complaint against Dell because they ignored my repeated cries to please remove me from their catalog mailing list, and today I got this following message from Dell's corporate office (listen here). The nice lady says she located my address and is removing it from their system. This is redundant as some other Dell execs say they've finally got my address removed but it does show that filing a BBB complaint does work for getting Dell to promise to stop sending you junk mail (we'll have to see what the mail man brings, or rather, doesn't bring, to know whether it worked completely). Here's where you can go to easily file one online.

(Photo: What Rhymes With Nicole)

]]>
Mon, 19 May 2008 16:30:59 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5009775&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Can Dell Stop Itself From Sending Me Catalogs? ]]> Dell, for the love of God, stop sending me catalogs! They are annoying and unwanted, not to mention, useless. If I want to buy something from you, I'll go online. I've filled out your online forms asking you to stop. I've asked over the phone. Three different Dell executives have been in email contact with me pledging that they would investigate the mystery of why Dell is addicted to sending me catalogs. I've burnt them. I've recycled them. They continue to arrive. In my previous post on this, someone mentioned they got Dell to stop after filing a BBB complaint. Here's where you go to make one online. I just filed one, my first ever BBB complaint (Dell, see what you made me do?). It took less than 5 minutes.

UPDATE: After drafting this post, I re-emailed the Dell execs who said they would help me. One of them wrote back to say that these May catalogs are the last I will get. He says that I spoke with him back in March, they had already missed the May cuttoff because they process the files far in advance. We'll see what the mailman brings next month.

]]>
Fri, 09 May 2008 11:34:26 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5008339&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dell Celebrates Earth Day By Sending Me Junk Mail After I Said Stop ]]> Despite my repeated requests via online form and phone, and even a few posts about it, including one where I made a photo spread of burning the offending items, Dell keeps sending me catalogs. So here is another post for the online pillory, but, in celebration of Earth Day, instead of burning these catalogs, I have recycled them (see above). Their inability/indifference is all the more stupid because two different Dell execs contacted me to say they would look into the issue. They even had me email them the cryptograms on my address label to help remove me from their mailing system. Dell, please, help me save the planet and take me off your stupid catalog lists. Otherwise I guess I'll just have to deem your material "pornographic" (hey, I know it when I see it, right?) and use USPS form 1500 to get you stop. When you decided to get people to lust after your XPS line, that probably isn't what you had in mind.

PREVIOUSLY: Dell Won't Stop Sending Me Catalogs So I'm Burning Them

]]>
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:48:11 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=382619&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Can The "Sears Catalog" Save Sears? ]]> When Sears chairman, Eddie Lampert, took over Kmart, he was determined to revive the long dead "blue light special." Excited about bringing back the old favorite, Lampert's chief marketing officer called the new campaign a "marketplace of discoveries."

Sadly for Lampert, the most shoppers "discovered" Kmart stores were dirty, understocked, and oddly overpriced.

The latest old idea that Lampert is going to make new again may be the "Sears catalog." The Chicago Tribune seems to think that its an old idea that may actually save Sears:

"If you think about what the Big Book originally tried to do, it was to open up all this stuff to people living in the cabins in the Plains, and that's essentially what they're doing," said e-commerce guru Bill Bass, who ran Sears' online business before Lampert took control of Sears in 2005. Bass currently is co-founder and CEO of Fair Indigo, a fair-trade direct merchant of clothing. "When you think about the power of the Internet, that's what it's really good at."

Brand expert Jonathan Salem Baskin is one who sees the potential. He outlined his self-described radical idea for saving Sears on his blog, envisioning Sears.com as "a gateway to whatever is hot." He suggests Sears host branded boutiques from vendors around the world. Its 3,500-store base could shrink and function as a place Americans can go to pick up or exchange merchandise.

"Talk about a rich heritage," said Baskin, president of Baskin Associates Inc., a Chicago-based brand consulting firm. "Like anything, it would take some commitment. Why couldn't Sears bring the world to me?"

Do we need another Amazon.com-type retailer?

How is Sears doing these days? Are they still having major problem with their repair division? Tell us at tips@consumerist.com, and put "Sears" in the subject. Remember: We love pictures.

Sears: Virtual approach to a vintage retailing idea [Chicago Tribune]
(Photo:I na aina e )

]]>
Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:52:51 EDT Meg Marco http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=376807&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Dell Won't Stop Sending Me Catalogs So I'm Burning Them ]]> Even though I have asked them several times and waited several months, Dell won't stop sending me catalogs, so I'm burning them. Every other company that sends me catalogs that I've requested to be removed from their mailing list has done it. I have called customer service on two different occasions and requested to be removed. I have gone to the special website on the back of the catalogs and requested to be removed. I have done this for both the sets of names and addresses they have on file for me. They don't care. I tried to be nice but obviously that doesn't work. So burn, baby, burn. It may not stop the mailings, but I felt better afterwards. Another image of Dell catalog immolation, inside...

In addition, I used to receive catalogs from Dell Home and Home Office but they honored my unsubscribe requests. Obviously whoever is running the small biz catalogs is not doing their job right. It's my hope that this series of beautiful and seemingly childish gestures might possibly prompt Dell to investigate the matter. If it results people's unsubscribe requests actually get honored, then I will have saved more trees by burning this catalog then if I recycled it. It's just a hunch, but somehow I don't think simply placing the catalog in the recycle bin will have the same effect as my direct marketing pyre.dellfire 002

dellfire 005

dellfire 006

dellfire 008

dellfire 008

dellfire 011

dellonfireonfire.jpg

dellfire 021

dellfire 024

dellfire 023

dellfire 022

dellfire 017

dellfire 015

dellfire 013

]]>
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:07:16 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=367469&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Get Off Catalog Lists For Free ]]> catalogchoice.jpgIt's annoying to have a bunch of useless catalogs cramming up your inbox, and they waste a lot of paper too. Now there's a new, free, site that will get you off all the catalog mailing lists. It's called Catalog Choice, an initiative endorsed by the the National Wildlife Federation and the Natural Resources Defense Council. Just sign up, fill in your address, and the customer number printed on the catalogs' address label. The site's staff then take care of contacting the catalog senders and getting off their mailing lists. Pretty much the easiest, fastest, and cheapest way to get rid of unwanted catalogs that we've ever heard of.

Catalog Choice [via Stay Free!]

]]>
Fri, 16 Nov 2007 08:41:43 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=323549&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Update: Getting Off Mailing Lists Is Fun ]]> mailinglistoff.jpgI'm happy to report that four months after requesting to get off the mailing lists for DELL (update: just got another catalog from Dell. Bastards!), Movies Unlimited, Tempurpedic, Guitar Center, New School, and my dentist's office, they've all complied. Yesterday I requested to get off Macy's and LL Bean. Still need to get off Harry & David, Banana Republic, and Old Navy. Out of the blue, I've also been getting these mailing address labels sent to me by various charities and other random unexpected pieces of junk mail where before I got none. I'm sure my creditors appreciate my checks arriving with the return address splayed on a picturesque snowman scene. I think when I signed up for a free cologne sample is how I got on the lists. Pretty stupid and I should've known better, but I thought it was going to be a whole bottle. It ended up being just a piece of scented paper. I resubmitted my name to the Direct Marketing Association's Do Not Mail list (it costs $1), which stops thousands of companies from junk mailing you.

PREVIOUSLY: Getting Off Mailing Lists Is Fun
(Photo: Getty)

]]>
Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:26:39 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=319945&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Getting Off Mailing Lists Is Fun ]]> junkmailpile.jpgWe sat down to try to get our name off six mailing lists today. It's really annoying to have all this crap clutter our mailbox. When we get it, we literally walk from the mailbox to the recycling bin. Dump. Nice marketing, guys.

Yeah, we've done business with all these guy guys before, but guess what? We don't want their mail.

Here's the results of our battles. You may be surprised at who was the hardest to deal with!

DELL: Relatively painless, but with a hold time of 5 min.

Movies Unlimited: Quick and easy.

Tempurpedic : Sales rep picked up right away, passed us right off to a customer service rep. She tried to look us up but couldn't find our phone number. Found us after we gave our name. Sounded really bored and condescending but we tried to disarm her by being super-nice and ignoring the disdain in her voice.

Guitar Center: Easey-Peasy.

New School: Number was hidden. We called the number that said, "call this number to request getting on our catalog mailing list." The guy told us to send in the mailing address label to a certain address. We asked him if there wasn't a number we could call. Cagily, he provided it, but it only lead to an answering machine.

Dentist's Office: They've been sending coupons to our apartment building addressed to RESIDENT. They tried to convince us that these coupons didn't exist, that they weren't on them, or the coupons were in some kind of Valu-Pack. They then tried to tell us that the coupons were being sent to the building, not me. We told them that they only showed up after we visited them, so they obviously had sold our address to somewhere. The secretary said that they don't have a list and don't send out coupons. We asked her if they didn't know who was doing their own marketing for them. The secretary said she would take down our info and "try" to see if she could "get in touch" with "whoever" was doing the mailing. We told her, no, you will not try, you WILL get us off the mailing list, consider this a formal request and get us off or we will report you to the FTC, we're saying, but that's just how it is, have a good day. CLICK.

Yep, if we were to file a complaint about a company not honoring our request to get off their mailing list, we would go to this FTC complaint form.

(Photo: The BrassPotato)

]]>
Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:08:04 EDT Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=279002&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ It's Hard To Stop The Catalogs ]]> Deb gets a lot of a catalogs. Sometimes two of the same, as she and her husband have two different last names.

When two get forwarded from her old address, it can be as many as four of the same catalog.

Several months ago, she decided to spend call up all ten of the catalog companies and request removal. Of the ten, six are still sending catalogs, despite all of them agreeing to have her address removed in weeks.

Companies that removed their names:

• Company Store
• Art.com
• JJill
• Boden USA

Companies that did not remove their names:

• JCrew
• Tiffanys
• Anthropologie
• Pottery Barn
• Urban Outfitters
• Crate and Barrel

Beyond scribbling "Return To Sender" on 'em, what else can one do? There's services like GreenDimes and 41pounds, but it's ridiculous that consumers should have to pay to get removed from lists they didn't agree to be on in the first place. Even registering for the "Do Not Contact" Direct Marketing Association list will cost you a dollar...


Deb writes:

"My husband and I receive an utterly ridiculous amount of catalogs in the mail. There have been days where we have received even a dozen; a dozen glossy, wasteful, unrequested, heavy piles of excess — worse yet, repeats of the information on these companies' websites — that go immediately into the trash without us cracking the cover. Even more irritating is that we have different last names so we often receive two copies of catalogs, and in a couple cases, four as two were forwarded from our old address, and two arrived at our new.

(I should note that some of these are companies that we have done online shopping with but never, even once, from their print catalogs over the phone.)

I'm not your prototypical environmentalist, but about six months ago I decided that if I could spend five minutes a day canceling these catalogs, I could probably save a landfill each year of our garbage alone. And while everyone laughed at my obsessiveness, I learned that companies have actually trained their customer service operators to know what to do to get your name removed from their mailings.

It just doesn't work. Of the ten companies I called before giving up, we are still receiving unending catalogs from SIX of them. Many told us it would take a few weeks for our names to be removed, but as it's been six months, it's clear that they were lying through their teeth.

I know I should waste my energy on bigger things, but this annoys the crap out of me and I would love to see an example made of the piles of waste these companies create every day, against their customers clearly-stated wishes.

Companies that removed our names:

* Company Store
* Art.com
* JJill
* Boden USA

Companies that did not:

* JCrew
* Tiffanys
* Anthropologie
* Pottery Barn (still sends catalogs to each of us)
* Urban Outfitters
* Crate and Barrel (still sends catalogs to each of us)"

— BEN POPKEN

]]>
Wed, 27 Dec 2006 21:44:43 EST Ben Popken http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=224681&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Bathroom Scale: Amazon.com Holiday Tool Guide 2005 ]]> The Catalog: Amazon.com's Holiday Tool Guide 2005. Yes, the online retail giant has a paper catalog.

The Target: People who have bought tools online from Amazon before, or the current resident.

The Models: Although there are exceptions that may also prove out our subconcious homosexuality, like the tight pair of jeans wielding the Black & Decker 18-Volt Cordless Broom, this catalog is heavy with musky, khaki-wearing white men. There is a black family on page 22, making up two of the four pictures in the Rubbermaid section. We could not tie that into a Jeffersons joke, which is probably for the best.

Bathroom Reading Rating: The Multi Tools page shows a strength that is missing from the rest of the catalog, diddling our fundamental male urge to purchase swords by the dozen. Other sections are bland, with product images shot in a white box with little context to show their use. The text overweighs the images. It's a lot like Amazon.com, actually.

Its blasé design compounds its fundamental shortcoming: reading this in the bathroom makes it nearly impossible to actually order anything. In fact, seeing this catalog did little more than reminds us that, "Oh yeah, Amazon sells tools." Do we really need a whole catalog when just a flyer would suffice?

As it says right on the busy, uninspired front cover: "See website for details."

One Dremel Cordless Pet Nail Grooming Kits out of five. As fun as printing email.

]]>
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:17:13 EST consumerist.com http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=143372&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Bathroom Scale: Williams-Sonoma Holiday 2005 Catalog ]]> williams-sonomacat.jpgThe Catalog: Williams-Sonoma Holiday 2005. The catalog for cooks and those who once saw Alton Brown in a Nashville Arby's.

The Target: Cooks, ostensibly. More likely, those who like to eat food prepared by cooks on nice china or are enticed by the prospect of 'six months of cheese.'

The Models: Entirely bereft of human faces, with only an occasional hand model to clutch firmly the stainless steel food mills and potato ricers. Thankfully, these hands are well manicured and do not suggest the tiniest amount of human skin or nail has escaped into the fruitcake.

Bathroom Reading Rating: Like the edelweiss, the layout is clean and bright. The unfortunate choice of placing the foodstuffs at the front of the book leaves us somewhat uncomfortable in suggesting the catalog be positioned for restroom reading.

Context, here, is king. If your home is festooned with the hot, freshly-pressed paninis and bay leaf garlands offered by the catalog, it would be gauche to let slip which company has provided inspiration. On the other hand, if you've recently upgraded to buying meals from "the good Chinese delivery," there's no need to remind your guests (and yourself) of what a horrible homemaker you are.

Three caramel-nut chocolate sticky paws out of five. Save it for the bedroom.

]]>
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:45:35 EST consumerist.com http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=142541&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Bathroom Scale: Anthropologie Solstice 2005 Catalog ]]> anthropologie_solstice05.jpgThe Catalog: Anthropologie Solstice 2005. 'Solstice' is Catalog for 'fancy.' Also online here.

The Target: Women who want their oaken headboards distressed, but their table lamps bouncing soft light off minimalist gauchos to be tear-dropped and unblemished.

The Models: Three-fifths, by weight, of the girls we knew next door. In Elf City. The redhead, relegated to the back of the book, is stunning.

Bathroom Reading Rating: The layout is unassumingly composited; the photography is interesting; the paper is soft, with a chalky cover that lends itself to languid browsing (or emergency shortages). Suitable for women and guys who would like to impress them, without being totally gay.

Four swallowtail floor cushions out of five. A keeper.

]]>
Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:09:12 EST consumerist.com http://consumerist.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=141590&view=rss&microfeed=true