"The charge looks like its the combo of several small order, 1 for 8.58 and 1 for 4.23.
Hasn't consumerist run a couple of stories already about fast food joints bunching in bad numbers and locking families out of their savings for a weekend cause of the tiem it takes to reverse these charges?"
"@BoomerFive:Guess you haven't done a google search then to see how many other designs the Jag copied.
Or should 3M pay everyone that used there products in a stunt?"
"@BoomerFive: The pic got famous, and?
3M tried to contact the pic owner, and from a business point of view that guy wasn't worth it.
So, like all the post it note jokes before and after the Jag, 3M did their own."
OminousG commented on Home Depot Website Prices Have Nothing To Do With In Store Prices
http://consumerist.com/5088032/OminousG commented on Home Depot Website Prices Have Nothing To Do With In Store Prices
http://consumerist.com/5088032/OminousG commented on Home Depot Website Prices Have Nothing To Do With In Store Prices
http://consumerist.com/5088032/OminousG commented on Circuit City Files For Bankruptcy
http://consumerist.com/5081885/OminousG commented on Honey, Was That PotBelly's Sandwich $4.23 Or $858,432?
http://consumerist.com/5056020/OminousG commented on Honey, Was That PotBelly's Sandwich $4.23 Or $858,432?
http://consumerist.com/5056020/OminousG commented on America's 10 Most Stressful Cities
http://consumerist.com/5051932/OminousG commented on 3M Steals Viral Image Idea To Avoid Licensing It
http://consumerist.com/5050252/OminousG commented on 3M Steals Viral Image Idea To Avoid Licensing It
http://consumerist.com/5050252/OminousG commented on 3M Steals Viral Image Idea To Avoid Licensing It
http://consumerist.com/5050252/next »