<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T10:26:58Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Verizon Wireless Relegates iPhone To Island Of Misfit Toys</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5399878" title="Verizon Wireless Relegates iPhone To Island Of Misfit Toys" />
    <published>2009-11-09T03:00:51Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-19T02:16:57Z</updated>
    <title>Verizon Wireless Relegates iPhone To Island Of Misfit Toys</title>
    <summary>--&gt;As a whimsical follow-up to AT&amp;T&apos;s lawsuit concerning their &quot;There&apos;s a map for that&quot; ads, Verizon Wireless released their Christmas-themed set of AT&amp;T/iPhone bashing ads today. They&apos;re harsh, but also pretty funny.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Laura Northrup</name>
      <uri>http://www.lauriebird.com/blog</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="AT&amp;T" />
    
    <category term="Verizon" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/consumerist/2009/11/misfit_iphone.jpg" height="194" width="340" />-->As a whimsical follow-up to <a href="http://consumerist.com/5396462/att-sues-verizon-over-theres-a-map-for-that-ads">AT&T's lawsuit</a> concerning their "There's a map for that" ads, Verizon Wireless released their Christmas-themed set of AT&T/iPhone bashing ads today. They're harsh, but also pretty funny.</p>
<p>Poor iPhone. Or, smartphone-like device that resembles an iPhone. According to Verizon, its 3G coverage means that it has no place in this world except the island of misfit toys.</p>
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4JgrBtn8XdU&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4JgrBtn8XdU&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://consumerist.com/images/consumerist/2009/11/4JgrBtn8XdU.jpg" style="display: none;" class="embeddedVideoThumbnail videoThumbnail_0"/></p>
<p>Other commercials declare that AT&T users will experience a blue Christmas, and that only the naughty will receive AT&T phones as holiday gifts. Ha ha! Sigh.</p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5399850/verizon-wireless-launches-three-more-anti+att-3g-network-commercials">Verizon Wireless Launches Three More Anti-AT&T 3G Network Commercials</a> [Gizmodo]</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16839726</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16839726" />
    <title>Comment from Eat A Peach on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Eat A Peach</name>
        <uri>http://www.myspace.com/fenderstratosphere</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.myspace.com/fenderstratosphere">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16673661" rel="nofollow">JerryMouse</a>: LOL! I admit that I own one (but I waited 2 years and for a great price - $50 for 8gb 3G model) but I'm one of those - you use what suits you and your budget. I personally like my AT&amp;T service and have been with them for over 7 years because of it, but I don't agree with the exclusivity end of the iPhone deal. But then again, if you really don't want AT&amp;T, pay full price for the phone and then unlock it so it can be used on other compatible networks (and to be honest I think all networks should have to be compatible so that any phone can be unlocked and used on any network out there).</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16719846</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16719846" />
    <title>Comment from That&apos;s Consumer007 to you on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>That&apos;s Consumer007 to you</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Good for Verizon.  The ad worked.  I'm an Iphone user and I HATE the lack of reception in Downtown Denver (yes on the streets, not just in the skyscraper, which I understand for other logistical reasons).</p>
<p>LOOKIE what I just got from AT&amp;T:</p>
<p>---------- Forwarded message ----------<br />
From: AT&amp;T- Rocky Mountain Region <br />
Date: Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:54 AM<br />
Subject: Great News - 3G Coverage throughout Colorado just got better!</p>
<p>Dear -REDACTED-,</p>
<p>We wanted you to be among the first to know! We've recently enhanced the 3G network throughout Denver, Boulder, Aurora, Englewood, Littleton, Longmont, Greely, Golden, Arvada, and Fort Collins to provide better in-building 3G coverage, fewer dropped calls and a better overall wireless experience.</p>
<p>The great news is coverage in Colorado will continue to improve as we expand capacity, optimize, and add more sites in the coming months.</p>
<p>With better coverage on the nation's fastest 3G network, there's never been a better time to be an AT&amp;T customer.</p>
<p>We thank you for your continued loyalty and look forward to sharing more good news soon.</p>
<p>Jace Barbin<br />
Jace Barbin<br />
Vice President &amp; General Manager<br />
Rocky Mountain Region</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16681816</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16681816" />
    <title>Comment from someToast on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>someToast</name>
        <uri>http://listen.toastradio.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://listen.toastradio.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16645997" rel="nofollow">chucklebuck</a>: I'm surprised that that WinMo phone they plug at the end of the commercial isn't.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16673661</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16673661" />
    <title>Comment from JerryMouse on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>JerryMouse</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16673508" rel="nofollow">Eat A Peach</a>: thank you, but im still not buying one :P</p>
<p>Great name btw! (peach)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16673508</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16673508" />
    <title>Comment from Eat A Peach on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Eat A Peach</name>
        <uri>http://www.myspace.com/fenderstratosphere</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.myspace.com/fenderstratosphere">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16643926" rel="nofollow">JerryMouse</a>: In the US the only other network you can use an iPhone on is T-Mobile and in some areas a network call IMMIX. The other carriers are all non-sim based and the iPhone in its current incarnation only works with GSM networks (sim card based).</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16672908</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16672908" />
    <title>Comment from pearl on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>pearl</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16643926" rel="nofollow">JerryMouse</a>: Well yeah, but you gotta unlock the iPhone to use it on another network, which is a breach of contract, right?. I'm not sure though because I'm not in the States right now. In Germany, T-Mobile sells the 3G 8gb iPhone with a prepaid option and the option to unlock after a year. Not the greatest but I'll take what I can get.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16667233</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16667233" />
    <title>Comment from El_Red on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>El_Red</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16644850" rel="nofollow">yentaleh</a>: Fido belongs to Rogers. AND uses Rogers network. You just probably got a crappy(bad luck, not necessary cheap) phone with Fido.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16667143</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16667143" />
    <title>Comment from El_Red on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>El_Red</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16654520" rel="nofollow">pot_roast</a>: GSM is already getting retired in several countries (just like analog, will take 8-10 years to completely disappear). LTE is an evolution of GSM.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16661263</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16661263" />
    <title>Comment from DangerMouth on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>DangerMouth</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16653979" rel="nofollow">CFinWV</a>: Well, yes, but there seems to be an extra helping of hate for AT&amp;T.</p>
<p>I watched my partner becoming more and more annoyed at the lousy coverage, dropped calls and billing issues, that he started keeping track of every. single. issue. and sending AT&amp;T a bill for his time every month, lolz.</p>
<p>But seriously, when you have to spend 3-4 hours on the phone every month just to get spurious charges removed, the hatred, it burns.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16654520</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16654520" />
    <title>Comment from pot_roast on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>pot_roast</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16645285" rel="nofollow">NeverLetMeDown</a>: Except that they already have one that 'works globally' - most of the planet uses GSM, not CDMA or LTE.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16653979</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16653979" />
    <title>Comment from CFinWV on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>CFinWV</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16650834" rel="nofollow">nobodyman</a>: I thought pretty much everyone hates cell providers and their ridiculous contracts and fees in general, not just AT&amp;T?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16653889</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16653889" />
    <title>Comment from CFinWV on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>CFinWV</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16643813" rel="nofollow">Silversmok3</a>: As someone who lives in the sticks I have to add a hearty "I agree."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16653795</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16653795" />
    <title>Comment from DoctorMD on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>DoctorMD</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I was at Sun Devil Stadium awash in AT&amp;T advertisements and barely had an Edge signal on my iphone. Awesome</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16653118</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16653118" />
    <title>Comment from PencilSharp on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>PencilSharp</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5399878/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys#c16644614" rel="nofollow">RobThy</a>: Verizon uses the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCann_Erickson" rel="nofollow">McCann Erickson</a> agency. These are the dudes who were responsible for a LOT of classic ad stuff (Coke's "Sing" and Rice-a-Roni's jingle).</p><br />
<p>And grouch all you want, iPhonies, but <i>you</i> are the ones giving Verizon buzz just by discussing it.</p><br />
<p>But what do I know? I'm only paying $15/mo for Net10 service...</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16653090</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16653090" />
    <title>Comment from ElizabethD on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>ElizabethD</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16648704" rel="nofollow">yentaleh</a>:</p>
<p>Rotary dial... ah yes, slo-mo dialing.  Until 1987 we lived in a rural town that had no touch-tone capability.  I don't miss those days.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16652108</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16652108" />
    <title>Comment from Chip Skylark of Space on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chip Skylark of Space</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>The biggest problem with Verizon is their damned support staff.  I worked with cell phones at work for about 2 years, and their billing was crap, their service staff was crap, and dealing with them was like dealing with IBM 30 years ago.  We had a bunch of people order personal cells from Verizon when they used to come to work and sell out of our cafeteria.  Everyone of those phones is now listed as a company phone, so if any of those people want to upgrade their service, I need to fill out a COA form for them.  Verizon's billing is so ancient that they can't do a mass change to correct their own fuck up, which they readily admit.</p>
<p>By comparison, AT&amp;T is flexible, and support can be easily reached at any time, and they get things corrected when you do.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16651227</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16651227" />
    <title>Comment from LadySiren on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>LadySiren</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16643448" rel="nofollow">Verucalise(countingcalories)</a>: Yeah but Verizon is raping my childhood memories here, LOL.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16650834</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16650834" />
    <title>Comment from nobodyman on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>nobodyman</name>
        <uri>http://youfailed.us</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://youfailed.us">
        <![CDATA[<p>These ads are smart because they don't attack the iPhone (which people like) but rather AT&amp;T (which pretty much everyone hates).    A wise move, especially considering that Verizon will be want to carry the iPhone when it's no longer an AT&amp;T exclusive.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16648972</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16648972" />
    <title>Comment from Greasy Thumb Guzik on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Greasy Thumb Guzik</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16647399" rel="nofollow">kcvaliant</a>: <br />
The storie I read said that Verizon turned down Apple because Apple wanted way too much control &amp; Verizon is all about control itself.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16648704</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16648704" />
    <title>Comment from yentaleh on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>yentaleh</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16646070" rel="nofollow">Thaddeus</a>:</p>
<p>ROFL! I remember phones before they had buttons. I had to keep my finger in the little dialing holes just so I could keep track on who I was calling. I was so happy when I got a "princess phone" back in 1978.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16648622</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16648622" />
    <title>Comment from scootinger on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>scootinger</name>
        <uri>http://www.scootinger.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scootinger.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16643363" rel="nofollow">xenth</a>: But viewers lose when companies like Verizon and (especially) AT&amp;T have anti-competitive exclusivity agreements for certain devices. Therefore, if I want an iPhone, I have no choice but to use AT&amp;T, which has HORRID data service in the town that I live in. A lot of the time I don't even get the 70kbps advertised by AT&amp;T for its EDGE service (and this is in the middle of town!); I suspect this is due to overloading of the network. On the other hand, both Verizon and Sprint offer 3G service in my area; I'm not sure about T-Mobile's EDGE service but wouldn't be surprised if it's superior to AT&amp;T's.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16647439</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16647439" />
    <title>Comment from kcvaliant on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>kcvaliant</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16646256" rel="nofollow">SkuldChan</a>: Yeah all my friends switched over to Iphone because they are sheep.. love the phone but hate the service, they either drop calls or never get text on time here in KC..</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16647399</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16647399" />
    <title>Comment from kcvaliant on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>kcvaliant</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16645487" rel="nofollow">facted</a>: Reports I have read said both Sprint and Verizon turned down the offer to have Iphones originally because of the cost that Apple wanted..</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16647158</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16647158" />
    <title>Comment from soloudinhere on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>soloudinhere</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16646256" rel="nofollow">SkuldChan</a>: the droid IS out. It came out yesterday.</p>
<p>And mine is not castrated as best I can determine.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16646256</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16646256" />
    <title>Comment from SkuldChan on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>SkuldChan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16643810" rel="nofollow">pearl</a>: As an actual AT&amp;T customer I love these ads - because I hope it encourages the company to fix their network.</p>
<p>Whats really awful is their coverage map is actually worse than what they protray. I live in an area that is solid blue for 3G, but I'm lucky if I even get cell service at all (frequently get zero bars). I'll probably switch to the droid once is comes out assuming Verizon doesn't castrate it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16646070</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16646070" />
    <title>Comment from Thaddeus on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Thaddeus</name>
        <uri>http://consumerist.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hey, anyone remember when people just used phones to make calls?  It was probably around the same time that movie came out...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16645997</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16645997" />
    <title>Comment from chucklebuck on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>chucklebuck</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>Is the Droid's $350 early termination fee somewhere on that island?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16645487</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16645487" />
    <title>Comment from facted on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>facted</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16643540" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: Verizon would love to have the IPhone on it's network. This is not a dig on the iphone but instead on the ATT network. You can bet that Apple is trying to figure out the best way to get out of it's ATT exclusivity contract and get their phone on other networks.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16645459</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16645459" />
    <title>Comment from RogerTheAlien on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>RogerTheAlien</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16644614" rel="nofollow">RobThy</a>: Even as an avid iPhone/Mac/Apple lover, I can recognize funny ads when I see them, even if they're at the expense of something near and dear to me. And yeah, these are clever ads. The advertising agency did a good job and, while I don't think they'd every sway me to go with Verizon, they're still fun to watch. Captialism at its finest.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16645285</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16645285" />
    <title>Comment from NeverLetMeDown on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>NeverLetMeDown</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5399878/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys#c16643957" rel="nofollow">CompyPaq</a>:</p><br />
<p>Reports today are that they're going to do a joint UMTS/CDMA phone, so they can essentially have one handset globally.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16645259</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16645259" />
    <title>Comment from dantsea on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>dantsea</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>All I really take away from that commercial is that Verizon doesn't have the iPhone, but they do have some phones that are like totes more awesome, but they're not going to tell me about them other than that the phones they sell aren't the iPhone oh and PS: iPhone!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16645246</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16645246" />
    <title>Comment from Shadowfire on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shadowfire</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16644635" rel="nofollow">JonBoy470</a>: I'm aware of that.  But Vermont still has almost no 3G coverage.  I believe there is a patch of it in Burlington, but the rest of the state has none.</p>
<p>Don't get me wrong, I wish my iPhone could get 3G here, but I'm not voolish enough to believe that I'm getting screwed by AT&amp;T on this.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16645030</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16645030" />
    <title>Comment from TVarmy on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>TVarmy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>So, does the Isle of Misfit toys get 3G coverage?  Looks to me like California and the Northeast corridor are perfectly good for it.  Is there something the government isn't telling me about New Jersey?  Is it actually a place where the flawed, misfit people are forced to live together?</p>
<p>Also, this makes the iPhone cute and charming, like a teddy bear with one eye.  Meanwhile, the Droid is scary and futuristic.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16644907</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16644907" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16644254" rel="nofollow">jparadise</a>: You make it seem much more trivial than it is. Why should people buy any phone on Verizon, including the Droid, if good features like a crisp screen and the availability of entertaining apps are not important?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16644862</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16644862" />
    <title>Comment from RogerTheAlien on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>RogerTheAlien</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16643765" rel="nofollow">Paladin_11</a>: I was definitely noticing that, too. But, calling the iPhone a misfit toy, whether directly or through alluding to it, probably won't endear Apple to Verizon too much. But you're definitely right; Verizon would probably kill to have the iPhone on their network and, right now, it seems kind of like a Sour Grapes mentality they're throwing out there.</p>
<p>Plus, no publicity is bad publicity? Like <a href="#c16643474" rel="nofollow">microcars</a> said above, it'll just remind people that they'd like an iPhone for Christmas. Unless they're part of the anti-iPhone cause. Because, you know, being pro- or anti-iPhone is totally a life-defining decision.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16644850</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16644850" />
    <title>Comment from yentaleh on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>yentaleh</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I bought the I-phone because I'm an incomplete quad (C8) and I needed a phone that would work for someone who has issues holding and being able to use a phone. My phone is completely voice activated and if I need to push the numbers or letters on the touch screen I can. I love my I-phone even if I'm with Rogers/AT&amp;T.</p>
<p>Oh and I used to have a phone by FIDO that Verizon's uses and I hated it. Coverage sucked and it was very difficult for me to dial or text. I would never think of going back to either FIDO or Verizon (If I move to the states) ever again.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16644635</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16644635" />
    <title>Comment from JonBoy470 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>JonBoy470</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16643856" rel="nofollow">Shadowfire</a>: Vermont has a longstanding moratorium on construction of new cell towers.  They don't restrict the carriers from recapitalizing the equipment they have on the towers built before the moratorium went into effect.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16644614</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16644614" />
    <title>Comment from RobThy on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>RobThy</name>
        <uri>http://www.twitter.com/RobThy</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.twitter.com/RobThy">
        <![CDATA[<p>That add is a winner... As are there is a Map for that ads. They have good luck for the most part with their ads. I wonder what company they use?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16644610</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16644610" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16643926" rel="nofollow">JerryMouse</a>: That's really only an option if you get T-Mobile coverage where you need it. That's not an option for us right now.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16644590</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16644590" />
    <title>Comment from RobThy on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>RobThy</name>
        <uri>http://www.twitter.com/RobThy</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.twitter.com/RobThy">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16643474" rel="nofollow">microcars</a>:</p>
<p>I'll take one too... once they leave AT&amp;T. :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16644254</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16644254" />
    <title>Comment from jparadise on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>jparadise</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think it's fair game. A lot of people buy the iPhone for the fun games and fancy screen anyways, and probably don't care about the 3G coverage issue.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16644191</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16644191" />
    <title>Comment from diasdiem on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>diasdiem</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Nobody wants a Charlie-in-a-Box! Or lousy 3G coverage, either.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16644098</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16644098" />
    <title>Comment from MooseOfReason on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>MooseOfReason</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Verizon has great commercials.  TV and phone.</p>
<p>Heh.  Remember the original "Can you hear me now?" ads?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16643957</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16643957" />
    <title>Comment from CompyPaq on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>CompyPaq</name>
        <uri>http://facebash.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://facebash.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16643540" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: I highly doubt that Apple at this point will release a CDMA iPhone, though they have been taking quite a bit of flack for the ATT problem.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16643944</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16643944" />
    <title>Comment from RogueWarrior on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>RogueWarrior</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>IMHO, I think Verizon missed a crucial point.  "Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer" totally rules as do all the characters in it so it's a natural fit for the iPhone.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16643926</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16643926" />
    <title>Comment from JerryMouse on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>JerryMouse</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16643810" rel="nofollow">pearl</a>: you do know that you can get the iPhone and not use it on ATT, right?</p>
<p>I have T-Mobile's myPhone3G (No Contract) and I'm using it on AT&amp;T instead (Waiting out the last 2 months of my AT&amp;T contract)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16643856</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16643856" />
    <title>Comment from Shadowfire on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shadowfire</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16643813" rel="nofollow">Silversmok3</a>: Verizon's coverage map is a load of crap anyway.  You have 3G coverage in Vermont?  No you don't.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16643813</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16643813" />
    <title>Comment from Silversmok3 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Silversmok3</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Meh. Every cell carrier has coverage holes...its just a matter of finding one that works where you are.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16643810</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16643810" />
    <title>Comment from pearl on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>pearl</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think this is rather immature. People want the iPhone, not necessarily AT&amp;T. So, they are stuck with AT&amp;T coverage if they want to deal with the iPhone through legal means. Sure, maybe Verizon does have a larger 3G network, but if there was some way to bring an iPhone to Verizon, then I'm sure people would change to Verizon. But alas, they use this so inconvenient CDMA.</p>
<p>- an impartial iPhone user</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16643765</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16643765" />
    <title>Comment from Paladin_11 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Paladin_11</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Look closely... it's not a real iPhone, it's a Chinese knock-off.  Verizon might be desperate but they're not stupid.  They really really want to carry the iPhone themselves.  Aside from the "Droid Does" stuff they've been very careful to attack AT&amp;T and not Apple.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16643540</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16643540" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>According to rumors I've heard, Verizon's going to be eating a LOT of crow come 3Q, 2010. That's assuming their rickety 3G network can handle the iPhone, that is.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16643474</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16643474" />
    <title>Comment from microcars on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>microcars</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>"oh look, an iPhone!  and some toys!  that reminds me: I want an iPhone."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16643448</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16643448" />
    <title>Comment from Verucalise(countingcalories) on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Verucalise(countingcalories)</name>
        <uri>http://www.myspace.com/verucalise</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.myspace.com/verucalise">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Reminds me of the Directv commercials LOL... love it!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878-comment:16643363</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5399878" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/verizon-wireless-relegates-iphone-to-island-of-misfit-toys.html#c16643363" />
    <title>Comment from xenth on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>xenth</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>When two marketers go to war, viewers win. Reminds me of the Budweiser vs Miller showdown.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:52Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



