<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T10:25:06Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Target Pays New Jersey $375K To Settle Fraud Charges</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5401732" title="Target Pays New Jersey $375K To Settle Fraud Charges" />
    <published>2009-11-11T04:27:39Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-11T04:27:52Z</updated>
    <title>Target Pays New Jersey $375K To Settle Fraud Charges</title>
    <summary>--&gt;Target has agreed to pay New Jersey $375,000 to settle charges that it sold baby formula and non-prescription drugs that had expired, and that it charged higher prices on some products than what was displayed on the shelves.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Chris Walters</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Government and Legal" />
    
    <category term="Target" />
    
    <category term="Walmart" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/consumerist/2009/11/111009-006-target-cart.jpg" width="160" height="160" class="left" />-->Target has agreed to pay <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #newjersey" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #newjersey" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/newjersey/">New Jersey</a> <a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/11/target_reaches_375k_settlement.html">$375,000 to settle charges</a> that it sold baby formula and non-prescription drugs that had expired, and that it charged higher prices on some products than what was displayed on the shelves.</p>
]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>From NJ.com:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>State officials said the company will no longer sell non-prescription drugs or infant formula beyond their <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #expirationdates" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #expirationdates" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/expirationdates/">expiration dates</a>, nor will it sell merchandise for more money than the displayed price. Target also created a new position to monitor the company's compliance with the settlement for the next two years.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The state's Division of Consumer Affairs <a href="http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf/2008/09/state_sues_retailers_over_expi.html">sued Target, Walmart, and Drug Fair</a> in September 2008, after finding that despite earlier agreements with the state, they were still selling expired products and charging wrong prices. Lawsuits against the other two retailers are still pending.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/11/target_reaches_375k_settlement.html">"Target reaches $375K settlement with N.J. for selling expired baby formula, charging different prices"</a> [NJ.com]<br />
(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jreed/1352409015/in/set-72157594517965216/">j.reed</a>)</p>
]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16731846</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16731846" />
    <title>Comment from MamaBug on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>MamaBug</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16722592" rel="nofollow">TheMonkeyKing</a>: I'm a milk maid myself.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16728061</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16728061" />
    <title>Comment from Looseneck on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Looseneck</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16722041" rel="nofollow">Skankingmike</a>: They were a private company so the problems were hidden from the public until the end.</p>
<p>The stores were suffering from 60's decor-making them look and feel dirty.  Many stores were in the process of make-overs, but the bankruptcy took care of that, no need to clean up the empty building left behind!</p>
<p>I didn't like shopping there myself since they stocked the same cheap, made-in-China crap everybody else seems to be selling. I don't blame you for staying away.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16722592</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16722592" />
    <title>Comment from TheMonkeyKing on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>TheMonkeyKing</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I guess I never thought expired items at a store are considered fraud. I thought it was lazy staffing or uninspired inventory management.</p><br />
<p>After all, I do read the labels and expiration dates. (And should everyone else, too.) You've probably seen me in the grocery store: I'm the one reaching into the back of the cooler to get the milk with the most distant expiration date. And when I've seen an item with an expired date, I'd give it to one of the stock people. I guess I should have sued them instead...</p><br />
<p>But then again, I don't think I've ever shopped at a Target for any consumables (food, medicine). And lately, Target's advertised prices aren't that attractive anyway.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16722041</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16722041" />
    <title>Comment from Skankingmike on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Skankingmike</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16721379" rel="nofollow">Looseneck</a>: well it felt pretty over night.  Not that i used them often. They always seemed dirty to me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16721379</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16721379" />
    <title>Comment from Looseneck on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Looseneck</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16705148" rel="nofollow">Skankingmike</a>: No, they were in trouble way before then.  I worked in the corporate office until soon before the company closed down.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16719675</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16719675" />
    <title>Comment from Deranged_Kitsune on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Deranged_Kitsune</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16705909" rel="nofollow">SaraFimm</a>: It was likely management telling those workers not to pull the expired merchandise from the shelves in the first place to make their bottom line look better by not having to write it off.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16719290</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16719290" />
    <title>Comment from drrictus on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>drrictus</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5401732/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges#c16712700" rel="nofollow">ShruggingGalt</a>: Zing!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16718606</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16718606" />
    <title>Comment from channelx99 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>channelx99</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Target does this all the time. When I go shopping I always buy only a few things on each trip but go more often. On 2/3's of my visits they overcharged me for one or several items I purchased and I have to point out what the advertised and displayed price was to get it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16717462</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16717462" />
    <title>Comment from foodfeed on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>foodfeed</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>i almost bought nicotine patches for my roommate on clearance at target last month until i noticed the expiration date from 2008. i asked the pharmacist and was informed that they were probably less effective and the adhesive might not hold. i told the pharmacist i would be getting the full price product and she asked if i could put the expired one back on the shelf.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16716245</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16716245" />
    <title>Comment from subtlefrog on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>subtlefrog</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16716233" rel="nofollow">subtlefrog</a>: gah.  pretty prevalent.  No coffee yet.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16716233</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16716233" />
    <title>Comment from subtlefrog on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>subtlefrog</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16707471" rel="nofollow">DangerMouth</a>: No, they don't.  I've seen expired merchandise in virtually every store I've ever been in at one point or another.  Not that I am trying to say it's ok.  Just saying it's prett prevalent.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16715434</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16715434" />
    <title>Comment from AllanG54 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>AllanG54</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>So, the state gets $375K and the consumers who bought this outdated crap get nothing. Typical.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16713630</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16713630" />
    <title>Comment from TWinter on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>TWinter</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The separate crew thing is really a good idea. Store managers are under lots of pressure to keep weekly hours worked under a certain number and checking expiration dates on vitamins and aspirin is always going to be a low-priority activity. A crew that sweeps in to do this every few months gets the job done and doesn't use work hours charged directly to the store.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16713115</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16713115" />
    <title>Comment from GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking</name>
        <uri>http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16708771" rel="nofollow">torgonius</a>: His loss restored my faith in NJ again.  Otherwise I was going to have to blow up the Driscoll(s) to separate those Northerners from the sane part of NJ.  Just remember all the "Real" Housewives of New Jersey were from North Jersey.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16712700</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16712700" />
    <title>Comment from ShruggingGalt on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>ShruggingGalt</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I heard that they settled for 375k, but when the state rang it up, it came out as 400k.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16712070</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16712070" />
    <title>Comment from Skankingmike on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Skankingmike</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16708771" rel="nofollow">torgonius</a>: to be fair he created lots of jobs for union workers :P</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16711773</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16711773" />
    <title>Comment from LJKelley on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>LJKelley</name>
        <uri>http://www.startblue.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.startblue.net">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16710437" rel="nofollow">Eldritch</a>: Well it isn't like NJ didn't also sue Walmart for the same practices.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16710437</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16710437" />
    <title>Comment from Eldritch on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Eldritch</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/EldritchGirl</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/EldritchGirl">
        <![CDATA[<p>And yet, Target is still better than Walmart somehow... even this news won't stop me from shopping Target. And I'm in NJ.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16709251</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16709251" />
    <title>Comment from smiling1809 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>smiling1809</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Hopefully, they will stop selling lunch meat, spinach, meat, eggs, cheese, and yogurt that are expired as well. I HATE having to muddle through things just to find something that wither hasn't expired or doesn't expire tomorrow.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16708771</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16708771" />
    <title>Comment from torgonius on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>torgonius</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16704631" rel="nofollow">jivesukka</a>: If only this ruling had come 2 weeks ago, the outgoing governor could have claimed (and not be lying) that he actually succeeded in creating a job!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16707939</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16707939" />
    <title>Comment from GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking</name>
        <uri>http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16707582" rel="nofollow">xtc46 - thinksmarter on twitter</a>: Not on the iTouch!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16707582</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16707582" />
    <title>Comment from xtc46 - thinksmarter on twitter on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>xtc46 - thinksmarter on twitter</name>
        <uri>http://think-smarter.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://think-smarter.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16707308" rel="nofollow">GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking</a>: there's an app for that.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16707471</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16707471" />
    <title>Comment from DangerMouth on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>DangerMouth</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16703814" rel="nofollow">Donathius</a>: My thought exactly.</p>
<p>Um, shouldn't they be actively NOT selling *everything* in the store past it's expiration date? I mean, considering that most Targets also sell food...</p>
<p>And Don't most supermarkets seem to manage this remarkable feat without a Compliance Czar?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16707308</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16707308" />
    <title>Comment from GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>GitEmSteveDave_IsSlacking</name>
        <uri>http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16706559" rel="nofollow">morlo</a>: Yes, because we can all decode bar codes.  With our minds!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16706559</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16706559" />
    <title>Comment from morlo on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>morlo</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16705909" rel="nofollow">SaraFimm</a>: All stocking should be done by robots anyway. Absent that, RFID tags should make it easy to find expired items. Absent that, bar codes should contain expiration dates. Absent that, we are a society of stupid stupid monkeys.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16705932</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16705932" />
    <title>Comment from TCama on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>TCama</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16703814" rel="nofollow">Donathius</a>: Yeah, isn't it great.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16705909</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16705909" />
    <title>Comment from SaraFimm on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>SaraFimm</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Obviously, these companies don't pay their employees to get the smartest or most industrious.  Usually, it's the employees (stocking) that pull expired merchandise and change the prices on the shelves to reflect what the store's registers have been programmed to collect.  So . . . maybe these companies should either higher more employees (doubt they will) or try to find good employees (good luck!), but I bet they'll just let the poop roll downhill on some poor shmucks who are overworked and underpaid.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16705148</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16705148" />
    <title>Comment from Skankingmike on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Skankingmike</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I wonder if that's why Drug Fair went under?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16705140</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16705140" />
    <title>Comment from Skankingmike on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Skankingmike</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5401732/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges#c16704262" rel="nofollow">GitEmSteveDave_OverSleptThisMorn</a>: ironically there is a company who does just this for Babys'r'Us It's called NMS</p><br />
<p>why hire and train when people already do it?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16704908</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16704908" />
    <title>Comment from Zeratul010 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Zeratul010</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>So, despite earlier agreements with the state, Target was still selling expired products and charging wrong prices.  State sues, and Target - agrees not to do it again.</p><br />
<p>Well done, New Jersey.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16704788</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16704788" />
    <title>Comment from hypochondriac on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>hypochondriac</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16704262" rel="nofollow">GitEmSteveDave_OverSleptThisMorn</a>:</p>
<p>How dare you expect common sense to prevail</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16704631</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16704631" />
    <title>Comment from jivesukka on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>jivesukka</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5401732/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges#c16704262" rel="nofollow">GitEmSteveDave_OverSleptThisMorn</a>:<br />You would think that they could just have the regular employees do this. It is easy as looking at the label on the box literally. One high priced idiot is one too many.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16704436</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16704436" />
    <title>Comment from hobbes84k on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>hobbes84k</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Ooh. I hope this doesn't mean that we're going to stop seeing funny Target prices and deals that aren't deals. That's one of my favorite things about Target.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16704262</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16704262" />
    <title>Comment from GitEmSteveDave_OverSleptThisMorn on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>GitEmSteveDave_OverSleptThisMorn</name>
        <uri>http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wouldn't it make more sense to hire a crew of people, and have them roam from store to store rather than one high priced idiot who doesn't actually physically do anything?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732-comment:16703814</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5401732" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/target-pays-new-jersey-375k-to-settle-fraud-charges.html#c16703814" />
    <title>Comment from Donathius on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Donathius</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>"...the company will no longer sell non-prescription drugs or infant formula beyond their expiration dates..."</p>
<p>Ummm...yay?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:36:29Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



