<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T10:17:20Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for NewEgg Told Me My HDTV Isn&apos;t Broken Enough To Return</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=10000269" title="NewEgg Told Me My HDTV Isn't Broken Enough To Return" />
    <published>2009-11-30T16:20:48Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-30T15:32:41Z</updated>
    <title>NewEgg Told Me My HDTV Isn&apos;t Broken Enough To Return</title>
    <summary>Israel says he ordered an HDTV from Newegg and wanted to return it once he discovered it had three dead pixels. In an online chat, a CSR told him the company wouldn&apos;t replace the TV unless there were eight or more dead pixels. He chose to lie and exaggerate the number of dead pixels in order to get a replacement. Israel writes: I purchased a 19 inch flat screen from newegg.com as a Christmas present for my brother who is away at school. I got the screen yesterday via UPS and the first thing I did was to test it...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Phil Villarreal</name>
      <uri>http://becauseitoldyouso.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term=" Returns and Exchanges" />
    
    <category term="Newegg" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Israel says he ordered an HDTV from <a href="http://www.newegg.com/">Newegg</a> and wanted to return it once he discovered it had three dead pixels. In an online chat, a CSR told him the company wouldn't replace the TV unless there were eight or more dead pixels.</p>

<p>He chose to lie and exaggerate the number of dead pixels in order to get a replacement. Israel writes:</p>

<p><blockquote>I purchased a 19 inch flat screen from newegg.com as a Christmas present for my brother who is away at school. I got the screen yesterday via UPS and the first thing I did was to test it in to make sure that everything was working. There are 3 dead pixels in the middle of the screen!! To make things worse, newegg does not replace screens unless there are 8 or more dead pixels! This return policy is ludicrous and I want to make sure that other consumers are aware of this and avoid purchasing these types of items from newegg. If I buy a new screen I expect it to be in 100% working condition and 97.5% is not acceptable. What is newegg thinking? I have only had great experiences doing business with them in the past, but this is the last time I buy anything from them.  I had to lie to the CSR and tell her I had 8 pixels in order for here to give me an RMA. Then she warned me that &#8220;so you know we made the exception of accepting the item i can not guarantee it will be replaced.&#8221;</p></blockquote>

<p>It wasn't right of Israel to lie, but NewEgg's restrictive return policy basically forced his hand. Have you ever fibbed to get your broken product to get a refund or exchange?</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005972</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005972" />
    <title>Comment from Chuck Norris&apos; wig on 2009-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chuck Norris&apos; wig</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Honest, sir, when I opened the box, the screen had a giant crack right through the middle of it. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T23:16:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005442</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005442" />
    <title>Comment from RedCatLinux on 2009-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>RedCatLinux</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Same here - I remember being able to walk into Egghead stores and buy software. I bought a LCD TV from them, and it's perfect. </p>

<p><br />
Course I might be hating life should I have to call on the warranty, but no pixels were harmed during the purchase or delivery of my TV.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T17:44:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005252</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005252" />
    <title>Comment from Admiral Byrd on 2009-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Admiral Byrd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>They are in the right because they have a crystal clear return policy that you have to click through before you can purchase the product. If the buyer doesn't like the terms, they are free to shop elsewhere, like Best Buy and pay an additional +50% markup.  Not all retailers have to have the same return policy.  Newegg has excellent prices and it's because they have policies like this that prohibit abuses that would drive up costs for a online-only business model.  For the OP to act like this 8 pixel minimum policy was some big surprise when he clicked though a terms of agreement page means he's an idiot. If you don't like the egg's return policies, shop elsewhere.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T16:00:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005245</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005245" />
    <title>Comment from plamoni on 2009-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>plamoni</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<p>What the costumer probably means is that they have "stuck" pixels. Dead pixels aren't quite as common as stuck pixels and it's nearly impossible to spot them without looking very closely at the screen (because they're black).</p>

<p>On the other hand, stuck pixels can be very annoying. I have an old monitor with 2 stuck pixels... one green (not so bad) and one bright pink (very distracting).</p>

<p>But I have two pieces of advice for the OP:</p>

<p>1: Read before you buy -- Newegg is VERY straight up about their dead pixel policy. When you buy a monitor, right in your cart there is a link to the appropriate return policy on the monitor. All the monitor return policies have (as one of 3 bullet points at the top):</p>

<p>"There must be a minimum of 8 dead pixels to declare an LCD display defective and eligible for return." - <a href="http://www.newegg.com/HelpInfo/ReturnPolicy.aspx#36" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/HelpInfo/ReturnPolicy.aspx#36</a></p>

<p>This is a policy that's seen lots of complaints, but Newegg doesn't try and hide it. So I don't think the OP should be complaining about a policy that's very straightforward.</p>

<p>2: It's possible that the pixels can be fixed. I ordered a monitor from Newegg a while back and it showed up with a red stuck pixel. Following internet folk remedies, I got a soft dry-erase marker, covered the tip with an old T-shirt, and (with the monitor off) firmly rubbed the area with the stuck pixel. It took a couple tries (because I was scared of breaking the screen, so I was timid at first), but the stuck pixel went away and I haven't had a single problem with the monitor since.</p>

<p>Of course, I can't say it will work for the OP, but if they're willing to give it a try, it might fix their problem. Word of warning, suck pixels seem to get more "stuck" over time. So the OP should do this soon or not do it at all. Second word of warning, I'm not responsible if you push too hard and break your screen. The tip of the marker should reduce the strain on the glass, but you could still crack your monitor doing this, and I'm not responsible if you do. Because I warned you. So do it at your own risk, and YMMV.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T15:57:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005237</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005237" />
    <title>Comment from Admiral Byrd on 2009-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Admiral Byrd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>because dkev doesn't really know what he's talking about. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T15:51:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005225</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005225" />
    <title>Comment from banmojo on 2009-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>banmojo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Newegg has their pixel policy listed in easy to understand format - I agree it sucks to have 3 pixels out on your 'new' device, but it's not like they didn't warn him about their policy.  If you want better warranty service you can buy extra coverage (with the money you saved shopping on Newegg) or go to a traditional brick/mortar setup (and frankly I've had better service from Newegg historically).  No I do not work for Newegg :^))</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T15:40:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005185</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005185" />
    <title>Comment from grandzu on 2009-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>grandzu</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Most HDTV return policies have an X number of pixels to be out before they initiate a return.  Typically if its only 3 pixels that are out, they could come back and start working with no ill effects.  <br />
Should have tried some solid color patterns flashes because whos to say the new set won't have the same issue?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T15:09:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005179</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005179" />
    <title>Comment from Howie411 on 2009-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Howie411</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I just had to post regarding this, I usually have this problem when buying a laptop.  In this day in age, if I buy a brand new product it should be 100% working, not 99.5%.  I once returned a laptop to Circuit City 4 times in a week before I just gave up on them and just returned it for my money back.</p>

<p>On a side note, I'm not sure if they still have it, but when Vizo first started in the market they have a 100% no bright pixel guarantee.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T14:53:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005100</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005100" />
    <title>Comment from Jeff-er-ee on 2009-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff-er-ee</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>"Sorry guys - but I agree with Israel here. He bought a product, paid for a product, and expected the product to work as advertised."</p>

<p>You've already lost me here in your first sentence.  The product did work as advertised.  It has 3 dead pixels, by his own admission.  The product was advertised to have less than 8 dead pixels.  Let's do the math.  It's relatively simple.  3 

<p>Didn't bother to read the rest of your post.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T08:38:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005098</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005098" />
    <title>Comment from Jeff-er-ee on 2009-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff-er-ee</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>"Regardless of the OP's lack of math skills, he's completely in the right when he says he expects the product to work 100%"</p>

<p>The problem that I have with this statement is (and pardon me for repeating this) that he has no right to expect 100% of the pixels to work.  He has a right to expect 99.9994% (I think that was the percentage) of the pixels to work.  It was stated to him before he purchased.  That was part of the warranty terms that he agreed to.  He has no right to expect what was clearly not promised.  </p>

<p>Your logic has confused me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T08:29:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005095</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005095" />
    <title>Comment from Jeff-er-ee on 2009-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff-er-ee</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think that Samsung is counting on people not noticing the dead pixels.  I'd bet that if you really examined each Samsung LCD on the shelf, the dead pixel count wouldn't be that different from other manufacturers.  Most people don't have Israel's highly trained and discerning eye.</p>

<p>I think that there are only something like 3 actual manufacturers of the panels anyway.  They're all re-branded.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T08:19:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005094</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005094" />
    <title>Comment from Jeff-er-ee on 2009-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff-er-ee</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  I think that The Consumerist stepped over the line with that comment.  I would hope that a site that is owned by an entity as seemingly unbiased as Consumer Reports would keep editorial statements like this off the page.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T08:16:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005091</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005091" />
    <title>Comment from Jeff-er-ee on 2009-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff-er-ee</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've been a "PC enthusiast" for many years (long enough to remember when Egghead Software first appeared), purchased 4 LCD monitors from NewEgg, and been supremely happy with them.  </p>

<p>Granted, I don't get out the lupe and examine every square centimeter.  I fire it up, run a red, green, blue, and black screen image, and if nothing jumps out, I call it good.  </p>

<p>Why is it a bad thing to buy LCDs from them?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T08:13:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005090</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005090" />
    <title>Comment from Jeff-er-ee on 2009-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff-er-ee</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm not clear on why it's a bad industry policy though.  I really like being able to purchase a 22" LCD monitor for under $200, and I (and apparently thousands of others) are willing to put up with a couple of dead pixels out of _millions_ to get that price.  Guaranteeing 100% perfect pixels would drive the price up substantially (based on the rate of true 100% perfect LCDs versus LCDs with a couple of bad pixels, I'd guess by several orders of magnitude).  It's not cheap manufacturing.  It's the nature of the beast when making these devices.  You either live with it, or pay the premium.</p>

<p>It is possible to pay extra to get perfection, and you're welcome to pay it if you'd like to.  I'll stick with perfect-enough and keep some cash in my pocket, thank you very much.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T08:00:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005067</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005067" />
    <title>Comment from Piznoup on 2009-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Piznoup</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I checked NCIX once out for a LCD monitor.  For a couple extra bucks you can buy a "No dead pixel guarantee"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T06:11:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005045</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005045" />
    <title>Comment from Mariushm on 2009-12-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mariushm</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The warranty on LCD screens is based on <b>ISO_13406-2</b> standard. </p>

<p>You can check the details here: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_13406-2" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_13406-2</a></p>

<p>Basically, there are 4 classes of displays - some companies offer warranty on Class 1 for their most expensive screens, some companies offer warranty based on Class 2. </p>

<p>Newegg is not at fault here, in most cases not even the manufacturer will replace it or fix it.</p>

<p>The page below is from a local IT store, translated from my native language (Romanian) to English by Google, and has information based on their experience with warranties:</p>

<p><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.intend.ro%2Fcms%2FGarantieTFT%2F&sl=ro&tl=en" rel="nofollow">http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.intend.ro%2Fcms%2FGarantieTFT%2F&sl=ro&tl=en</a></p>

<p>The translation is not perfect due to some sections being pictures, but if there's a word you don't understand you can use Google Translate to get its meaning.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T05:23:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005032</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005032" />
    <title>Comment from gregf on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>gregf</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Newegg can't protect users from there own stupidity. The return policy for dead pixels is spelled out all over the place on the site before you order a tv or computer monitor. He knew this before ordering. This is also pretty lenient compared to a lot of manufactures own rules on dead pixels. Not saying it doesn't suck, but don't blame Newegg when they have to comply with the manufactures rules. Specially when they clearly spell it out for you before you order. If you really want to be sure go to a store and make them plug it in before you buy it.</p>

<p>On top of this the guy lies about his tv and they still send him a new one. They could have checked and told him to pound sand. Plus charge him to send it back to him for lying in the first place. It's in there right at that point since his lack of reading is now costing the company money.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T04:34:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005028</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005028" />
    <title>Comment from friday3 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>friday3</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Actually, since they bought from newegg, they are the authorized agent for samsung and therefore acts on their behalf.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T04:23:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005025</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005025" />
    <title>Comment from friday3 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>friday3</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Why is selling something with 3 of anything not working before it is out of the box?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T04:16:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005019</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005019" />
    <title>Comment from montusama on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>montusama</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>My first LCD monitor I bought from Newegg had one dead pixel near the middle area. My latest monitor Asus 26" monitor has about four dead pixels but all in the lower right corner area. I knew ahead of time of this policy and had no problem with it as I realize why its in place. </p>

<p>LCD manufacturing is not a perfect technology it has flaws, if you wanted a zero-dead pixel policy you should of either gone with B&M stores like Bestbuy (well can't say Circuit City anymore so other stores) or with the few online retailers that also do this policy.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T03:55:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20005007</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20005007" />
    <title>Comment from Michael the Great on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael the Great</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It may not seem cool to the consumer (me included) but this isn't an abnormal policy. We can either all pay more for guaranteed perfect pixels or pay less for ones that might have a few dead pixels. It is also true that many consumers will never notice. But, when I've noticed a dead pixel on a display, it's driven me crazy!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T03:10:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004997</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004997" />
    <title>Comment from PLAAND88 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>PLAAND88</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The OP's math is wrong on a 720p HD display 3 dead pixels represent 0.084% of the total pixels (921,600), assuming he only counts pixels as counting towards a functional display and not the other hardware that makes up the TV (Backlight, control board, etc.) then his TV is 99.916% functional. If you take into account the backlight and controlboard then his TV is 99.971% functional.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T02:43:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004996</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004996" />
    <title>Comment from TechnoDestructo on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>TechnoDestructo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Newegg DOES state that policy, though.  </p>

<p>It's a bad policy based on bad industry practices, but it is stated.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T02:38:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004988</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004988" />
    <title>Comment from Viciouspixie on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Viciouspixie</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>While I don't agree with the Op lying to get his product replaced, I feel that he shouldn't have been placed in the situation to lie in the first place.</p>

<p>He bought the item as a gift for someone.. how would you feel giving someone a defective gift? Lets face it - 3 dead pixels are 3 dead pixels - suddenly the product you bought doesn't feel brand new and exciting, and on the middle of the screen of a tv - I'd say it's downright annoying especially when it's 19".</p>

<p>I think the policy should apply towards replacing used equipment, ie.. using a tv for x months and defective pixels develop - that's more reasonable, but to take out a tv new from the box and find dead pixels.. I think the customer should be able to go back to the store and get the tv replaced - or in this case mail it back.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T01:57:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004987</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004987" />
    <title>Comment from ninjatoddler on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>ninjatoddler</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I can see where Israel is coming from especially if he is inexperienced in purchasing LCDs be it due to age or lack of exposure to those kinds of products.</p>

<p>Most retailers have some sort of dead pixel policy .. like Dell used to have 6 pixels for 14.1" LCDs back in the day. Others offer a "no dead pixel" guarantee for a small fee but all this arguing isn't going to solve the problem and lying to NewEgg doesn't help.</p>

<p>For dead/stuck pixels, there are 2 options for a resolution before going to the CSR:<br />
1. Push on the LCD screen where the dead pixels are located. Sometimes a small nudge fixes the problem.<br />
2. Try using one of the many online screen flashing tools. Actually here's a link to a site which has a multitude of screen flashing tools.<br />
<a href="http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/best-software-solutions-to-fix-a-stuck-pixel-on-your-lcd-monitor" rel="nofollow">http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/best-software-solutions-to-fix-a-stuck-pixel-on-your-lcd-monitor</a></p>

<p>If that doesn't help, just quit whining about a 0.00001% defect on the screen and get over with it. Not getting the exact RAM or hard disk space is a bigger concern for most people.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T01:52:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004976</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004976" />
    <title>Comment from supercereal on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>supercereal</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<blockquote>Chances are they're not even going to look at the screen. They're going to ship it back to the mfr as defective. Once the mfr. decides they're getting too many returns for defective screens, their standards will go up, and the consumer will benefit.</blockquote>
That's not true at all.  The only thing that will go up is prices; standards will remain exactly the same.  By acting like a scum-of-the-earth, precious snowflake, willing-to-lie-and-deceive-to-get-your-way consumer, you're doing nothing but hurting everyone else.  Grow up, suck it up, read the damn policies before you buy, and take your business somewhere else if you don't agree with those policies.  ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T01:16:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004975</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004975" />
    <title>Comment from Blackneto on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Blackneto</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Is consumerist trying to throw away any credibility it has by allowing editors to post statements like that?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T01:15:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004961</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004961" />
    <title>Comment from baquwards on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>baquwards</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The single best buying experience that I have ever had was through newegg.  An LCD Tv was shipped to me and UPS destroyed it, I refused delivery and called Newegg, explained to them how disappointed I was (it was packaged poorly and should have been taped up before shipment).  Their policy was not to ship another until the damaged one was returned, I told them that they could charge my card for the new one until the old one was returned.  THEY OVERNIGHTED ME A NEW TELEVISION, at no extra cost to me, and never put through a charge for the second one, they just trusted me.</p>

<p>They went above and beyond on this transaction.  </p>

<p>But I also knew their policies and never asked them to break policy and never lied to try to get my way.</p>

<p>And yes the pixel policy was the same two years ago when I bought the tv, and I was well aware of it before I completed the transaction.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T00:30:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004957</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004957" />
    <title>Comment from psm321 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>psm321</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is why I always buy LCDs locally unless it's a ridiculously good deal.  Even a single dead pixel would drive me crazy, so with a local store I can just go exchange it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T00:22:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004954</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004954" />
    <title>Comment from andersonxe on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>andersonxe</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>i had to created an acount so i can comment on this<br />
WTF is this? 8 dead pixel is standard, so this guy lies about about it to newegg? why is The Consumerist promoting this? i hope newegg charges him for it. and no, newegg did not force his hand, i can't believe anyone would do such a thing, shame on you, especially lying to newegg, lying to bestbuy i can understand.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T00:17:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004953</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004953" />
    <title>Comment from TechnoDestructo on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>TechnoDestructo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I recently bought an LCD monitor from Newegg.  I checked every user review on several different monitors for mentions of dead pixels before I bought.  </p>

<p>Look for one with no complaints of dead pixels, or where they're rare, and minimize the risk.</p>

<p><br />
Also, dead pixels are dead easy to test for.  If they have a video source set up to display red then green then blue, you could easily do it in 30 seconds per monitor, maybe more if they have to circle them.  And testing them for dead pixels is also testing the power supply and back light, so you know none are dead out of the box.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-01T00:14:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004945</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004945" />
    <title>Comment from Kitamura on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kitamura</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>And rightly so, if they want to RETURN the product, I'm sure they are free to do so, however they would then have to be encumbered by any shipping and restocking fees that accompany an online return.</p>

<p>However, it would appear they want an EXCHANGE, which in such as case their product must meet the criteria needed for the exchange.  In this case 8 dead pixels which they agreed to prior to their purchase of the product.  I could understand if there was no warning, but this is an agreement you must accept to even be able to place your order.  And it's not in some sort of lawyer lingo, it's in plain English.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T23:50:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004894</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004894" />
    <title>Comment from Razor512 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Razor512</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The  pixel crap needs to change, trust me even 1 stuck pixel in the center of a screen is annoying, because you know that the red or green  or bright blue dot does not belong there</p>

<p>it is annoying when you are reading something and you see dots in the centrer of the screen. </p>

<p>people need to stop looking at this as 99.99% and look at it in a more visual way. </p>

<p>if you are sold a monitor that does 1280x720 then you expect to have all of the 1280x720 pixels that you paid for and if they cant provide that then that monitor should be cheaper.</p>

<p>the production lines of these companies have quality control, they know how many dead pixels are on each screen, they should be required to label then and mark down the price on the defective ones.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T22:41:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004877</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004877" />
    <title>Comment from Persistence on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Persistence</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Technically, if the resolution was set to 1280x1024, it's in 99.99999774639423077% working order.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T22:19:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004858</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004858" />
    <title>Comment from coren on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>coren</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>He bought a product that was advertised to work in x way.  He wants it to work in y way, which was not advertised.  As such, it's not the seller's fault, as they sold it that way and did not hide that fact.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T21:58:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004855</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004855" />
    <title>Comment from nickster on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>nickster</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Once you know where the dead pixels are it's hard not to notice them.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T21:56:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004854</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004854" />
    <title>Comment from YOXIM on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>YOXIM</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I make my own TVs at my locally owned and operated TV shop. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T21:56:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004848</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004848" />
    <title>Comment from LatherRinseRepeat on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>LatherRinseRepeat</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I love Newegg. But I hate their return policy on LCD monitors.Too restrictive. And sometimes their product descriptions/pictures are wrong. You really need to twist some arms with the CSR if you want to return something because their website has inaccurate product information.</p>

<p>And that's why I buy my monitors from Amazon, or Fry's, or Dell. No hassle returns.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T21:50:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004838</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004838" />
    <title>Comment from henrygates3 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>henrygates3</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Apparently I don't understand the product. I have only bought one LCD in my lifetime, a computer monitor, and the store receipt said nothing about a dead pixel minimum, nor did the salesman. I think for most people, they will assume that if they are purchasing a new product it will not have inherent defects that the industry considers acceptable.</p>

<p>I say it's not a warranty issue because it falls within the retailer's return policy.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T21:45:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004829</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004829" />
    <title>Comment from Ein2015 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ein2015</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is why I couldn't imagine buying a huge TV from an online retailer. I get scared anytime I buy a monitor.</p>

<p>NewEgg CSRs are always hard as iron, though. I'm surprised this one let the OP lie!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T21:40:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004828</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004828" />
    <title>Comment from Miraluka on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Miraluka</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>So this is a story, why? Because Israel didn't bother to read the standard return policy prior to making his purchase? Or because he's a lying cheat?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T21:38:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004816</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004816" />
    <title>Comment from d on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>d</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sorry guys - but I agree with Israel here.  He bought a product, paid for a product, and expected the product to work as advertised.  That it had three dead pixels in the middle of the screen, and that they bugged him enough to make the call means that the product wasn't working as advertised.</p>

<p>Let's face it - that's the middle of the screen, you're going to be looking at them all the time.  He didn't say what color they were dead at, but let's assume they were bright green.  Now would it piss you off?</p>

<p>A long time ago, I saw Ghostbusters.  Remember when Bill Murray said "If someone asks you if you're a God, YOU SAY YES?!" - same principle applies to stupid company policies designed to screw over the customer.  If they say "Do you have 8 dead pixels?" you say "YES!" - ship that damn thing back and let them handle it.</p>

<p>Chances are they're not even going to look at the screen.  They're going to ship it back to the mfr as defective.  Once the mfr. decides they're getting too many returns for defective screens, their standards will go up, and the consumer will benefit.</p>

<p>But until that time, the standards will only tend to go down - because some fool exec trying to goose her bonus will think "hmmm, what would we save if we eeked up to 4, 5, or 6 pixels?"...</p>

<p>FWIW, if the pixels were blue or red and in the corners and weren't grouped, I wouldn't care - but if they were in the center, it'd make me nuts...  I'd return it too...</p>

<p>Newegg is generally pretty good at returns, but any retailer deserves the same level of consideration for inane policies - ZERO.  Tell them what they want to hear, and move on.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T21:30:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004815</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004815" />
    <title>Comment from bigd73 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>bigd73</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>My first 2005 Sony PSP had 32 dead/stuck pixels on a 4 inch screen. Out of the 3, I was finally happy to have one with only a dozen dead/stuck pixels. I wouldn't have cared but they were always clustered either in the center of the screen or in the areas of the screen I needed to see game information or detail. On a 19" screen 4 dead pixels would be no problem considering you are not close up and I would imagine a dozen pixels wouldn't be noticed. If I'm not mistaken the pixels either being dead/stuck is just the product of LCD's and not really an error. Last note, I did try those programs to unstick the pixels and tried a couple and left the units running for quite a while but it didn't work for me. I would have been happy to just keep the PSP's and fix it myself but oh well. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T21:25:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004810</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004810" />
    <title>Comment from masso on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>masso</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Newegg treated me very well. And I imagined a lot of people have very good experience with Newegg customer service. And dead pixel count is industry standard, and a risk clearly stated. There are other retailers/brand that will refund him if there is one pixel. He COULD shop there next time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T21:22:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004753</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004753" />
    <title>Comment from thomas_callahan on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>thomas_callahan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>8 pixels is standard especially on a TV that you'll usually only see from across the room. Laptops have the same policies, but I think I've always seen 3 pixels on those, probably because you're a lot closer and more likely to care about the bad pixels. </p>

<p>I had a Dell laptop that got one bad pixel (luckily dark so it wasn't that noticeable) and they wouldn't do anything until a few weeks later when an entire vertical column of pixels (1200 pixels) went bright green (with the one black on in the middle).</p>

<p>If you want LCD screens guaranteed to have 100% working pixels, get ready to pay a lot more for them. Or try a better brand, they're a lot more likely to have 100% working pixels. You want cheap LCD screens? Then suck it up.</p>

<p>I suggest you check other retailers, I don't think NewEgg is out of line here. I was aware of this policy from them and I've never actually bought one from them, just window-shopped.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T20:44:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004752</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004752" />
    <title>Comment from dreamcatcher2 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>dreamcatcher2</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Why should they, exactly? I've bought an LCD from Newegg before, and they are always crystal clear about their dead pixel policy, reminding me on the product page and also when I check out. I think the only burden on Newegg is to be clear about the nature of the transaction, and they ARE clear. There's no law that says every retailer needs to accept all returns for 30 days, and in most industries that would just drive up costs and waste immensely.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T20:44:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004742</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004742" />
    <title>Comment from dreamcatcher2 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>dreamcatcher2</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've purchased from Newegg before, and they are always crystal-clear about their return policies. I purchased an LCD monitor from them a month ago, and their dead-pixel policy was spelled out clearly and I agreed to it, accepting the risk of a few dead pixels that comes with the cheaper price of online retail. As it happens, I had one single "bright" pixel out of ~1 million, and that was an acceptable (and barely noticeable) defect level. </p>

<p>This is just one of the tradeoffs that you may choose to make while shopping. Having been through the newegg shopping flow, I find it difficult to imagine Israel was unaware of Newegg's policy, which they make quite clear. Newegg did NOT force his hand, Israel just tried to have it both ways.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T20:38:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004724</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004724" />
    <title>Comment from jesusofcool on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>jesusofcool</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>One time I closed my laptop under warranty and didn't realize how hard I'd put the screen down. I opened it the next day and there was a thin blue line down the center of the lcd screen. I called it in and I didn't say to them, you know, this might be my fault. Another time, I bought an mp3 player (an expensive one by a name brand). I also purchased an expensive hard case. On the third day of owning it it fell to the floor and refused to work after that. I called in the warranty, and again I didn't say "oh and by the way, this might be my fault"<br />
Maybe I'm going to hell too, but I think a lot of people do this. These were expensive products but had warrantys that only covered product defects, but IMO most product defects are uncovered through instances like these I've described - normal wear and tear, including some light misuse. <br />
I especially don't feel bad about returning the mp3 player - it was absolutely defective - I've owned (and occasionally dropped) my replacement player, same model in the same protective case, many times over the last four years and it still works like a charm. In some cases, warrantys are designed to be so ironclad that a little white lie or omission is necessary. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T20:30:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004660</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004660" />
    <title>Comment from charlietilt on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>charlietilt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>NewEgg returns department/policy/support sucks!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T19:59:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004654</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004654" />
    <title>Comment from SDJASON on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>SDJASON</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>To some extent, I agree with the OP, in that i feel that you should be able to warranty replace a monitor for even ONE dead pixel. You paid for a monitor, and a few dead pixels is not a pristine product, which is what you paid for. If you bought a hard drive with some bad sectors, you'd sure as hell be returning it and getting a "pristine" one. </p>

<p>HOWEVER, he accepted the warranty terms when he bought it, so he was definitely wrong in lying to return it. </p>

<p>On a side note, i've yet to have a screen with dead pixels i was unable to fix by running a dead pixel unsticking program and massaging the pixels every few hours. I had a laptop once with about 3-400 dead pixels (a whole side of the screen) bought brand new, which i was able to get every single pixel working with a pixel unsticking program run over a 24 hour period and massaging them every few hours. I bet if he tried this, all would have been well. I've yet to not be able to "unstick" a pixel if i let it run long enough<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T19:55:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004649</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004649" />
    <title>Comment from pantheonoutcast on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>pantheonoutcast</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Are 90% of the commentors Newegg employees or LCD manufacturers? Yes, we get it, Newegg has an "8 pixel" return policy...does that mean we should blindly accept something, shrug our shoulders and say, "C'est la vie?" Saying that a dead /stuck pixel policy is industry standard does not bring about positive change for the consumer.  If a company cannot manufacture something that is up to the customers' expectations, then maybe that company should re-think their business model.  </p>

<p>Regardless of the OP's lack of math skills, he's completely in the right when he says he expects the product to work 100%.  Regardless if he bought an 19" AOC or a 52" Kuro, the customer has every right to expect that the product is free from defect.  To this customer, 3 dead / stuck pixels is defective, no matter how you want to look at it.  </p>

<p>And for those of you saying, "Well, if was me, I'd understand that Newegg has that policy, nothing is perfect, it's only 3 pixels...blah blah blah...." No you wouldn't.  You'd be emailing Consumerist to get the contact info of everyone working at Newegg from the President of the company on down the chain of command for an EECB. You'd be shouting "Chargeback!"  You'd be firing off angry missives to your state attorney general.  Have a little perspective people.  </p>

<p>You people make it sound as though he told Newegg that his little old grandmother was crushed to death under the TV just to get a refund.  Lied about a few pixels in order to get what he paid for?  Good.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T19:53:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004637</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004637" />
    <title>Comment from Kitamura on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kitamura</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>See, but then you're "returning" the product.  Nevermind that you're probably going to "buy" another of the same product in about 10 seconds and that you'll be able to talk the salesrep into selling it for the same price as the one you just brought back.</p>

<p>It's a little bit different than walking into the store asking to exchange the product.  It's only easier at a brick and mortar because there's less stuff to fill out when they do it as a return and new sale rather than an actual exchange (especially if it involves serial numbers), so that's how they'll generally process it.</p>

<p>With an online store, there's shipping costs involved, so if it's a replacement, they're going to make damn sure that it fits their definition of broken.  If it's a return, well, hey, you the customer are paying the shipping.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T19:44:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004626</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004626" />
    <title>Comment from matt314159 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>matt314159</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The pixel count thing is standard and varies by manufacturer for their warranties.  Sometimes it's "X total" pixels on the screen dead, or sometimes it's like, if there are more than x in the center area (usually a lower number like 3 or 4) then they'll take it back.  But this is pretty standard operating procedure for most TV manufacturers and / or retailers.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T19:35:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004614</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004614" />
    <title>Comment from [DFX] Deimos on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>[DFX] Deimos</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The OP is completely in the wrong here.</p>

<p>It sucks to have dead pixels, but the policy that the OP *MUST* have agreed to states that 8 dead pixels is the minimum required for a return.</p>

<p>NewEgg has always had great customer service, and this is simply a case of someone crying because they aren't getting what they want.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T19:22:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004611</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004611" />
    <title>Comment from Fred E. on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Fred E.</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Dead pixels are completely black and they can frequently be fixed by massaging. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T19:19:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004605</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004605" />
    <title>Comment from Arsenal on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Arsenal</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I love this site - but you need to restrain your weekend editor - Newegg has always been one of the best companies to buy from on the web.  I have bought thousands of dollars worth of parts from them and they are always outstanding.  OP is obviously a cheat.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T19:17:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004595</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004595" />
    <title>Comment from Raketkirurg on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Raketkirurg</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, see, it's like this: You can buy LCDs with a zero-defect guarantee, but those cost more. Or, you can buy a cheaper LCD, where you have to accept a certain defects.</p>

<p>It's exactly like how CPUs of the same model rated for different clockspeeds actually come from the exact same wafers. Some have minor defects that prevent them from being clocked at full speed, but work fine if underclocked, and are sold as lower clocked parts at a discount.</p>

<p>Or, if you go to an outlet store, you can usually buy slightly off-spec goods at reduced prices. Or, you can buy canned goods in dented cans for a fraction of what the undented can goes for.</p>

<p>This is not being an apologist, the manufacturers are not trying to hide the fact that for the lower priced product, you have to accept defects that they will cover if you buy the exact same model LCD panel in a more expensive package.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T19:10:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004593</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004593" />
    <title>Comment from AirIntake on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>AirIntake</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Oh, you'd like proof? I'm being generous here, as I'm using Newegg.com to look at the TV prices when they won't even ship to Canada. If I were to be fair, and compare Newegg.ca to my Canadian Best Buy, Newegg loses hands down, as they only sell 6 TVs, only 2 of which are 1080p like my Samsung. Both of those are made by Auria, and are 22" and 26", not 40" like mine. So no, Newegg cannot compete with Best Buy on both price and selection, in my market. Feel free to take a look at the craptastic TVs they offer: <a href="http://www.newegg.ca/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&SubCategory=411&N=2102640411&SpeTabStoreType=10" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.ca/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&SubCategory=411&N=2102640411&SpeTabStoreType=10</a> </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T19:10:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004588</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004588" />
    <title>Comment from Thanatos on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Thanatos</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have a 40" HDTV that has one lazy pixel (displays everything but red tones) towards the top left of the screen and it drives me nuts. Not enough to get a new set but i still notice it all the time so for me 3 would drive me insane.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T19:09:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004580</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004580" />
    <title>Comment from Thanatos on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Thanatos</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I ordered my 24" LCD from ncix.com because they had a zero dead pixel guarantee, was worth the little added price.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T19:07:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004575</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004575" />
    <title>Comment from AirIntake on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>AirIntake</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>No they don't, not on TVs "Restocking fee<br />
A restocking fee of 15% will be charged on opened notebook computers, projectors, camcorders, digital cameras, radar detectors, GPS/navigation and in-car video systems unless defective or prohibited by law. A restocking fee of 25% will be charged on Special Order Products, including appliances unless defective or prohibited by law. "</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T19:04:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004568</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004568" />
    <title>Comment from AirIntake on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>AirIntake</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Best Buy's policy is: "Restocking fee<br />
A restocking fee of 15% will be charged on opened notebook computers, projectors, camcorders, digital cameras, radar detectors, GPS/navigation and in-car video systems unless defective or prohibited by law. A restocking fee of 25% will be charged on Special Order Products, including appliances unless defective or prohibited by law. " - There is no restocking fee on TVs at Best Buy.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T19:02:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004557</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004557" />
    <title>Comment from AirIntake on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>AirIntake</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't know if it's true about buying online at Best Buy, but they have never added a restocking fee to anything I have returned there within their return period. I have never seen any restocking fees in any of their policies.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:58:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004551</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004551" />
    <title>Comment from Brazell on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Brazell</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>TV's actually have a special return policy on them on NewEgg.  I bought my 46"er last year, of which I've been exceptionally pleased with, and I remember a unique policy.  They may still have a no-questions-asked 30-day return policy, but the OP may have gotten a special deal w/o wanting to lose it.</p>

<p>But, facts are facts, NewEggs RMA policy for LCD TVs is very clear and it's not hidden in any fine print or anything... they throw it right at you.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:56:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004550</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004550" />
    <title>Comment from Ceolwulf on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ceolwulf</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>That's fixing a stuck pixel, not a dead pixel. You can't fix a dead pixel.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:56:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004549</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004549" />
    <title>Comment from Winter White on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Winter White</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Given the way you hear people talking on here, you'd think dead pixels were the end of the world as we know it...</p>

<p>I've bought probably 20 LCD panels/TVs in the past 10 years and I have never had a dead pixel...or maybe I'm just not OCD enough to notice??</p>

<p>Seriously. If this guy bought the 19" Sceptre display that I just picked up for my dad to use as a TV for the kitchen, it is utter crap (thankfully my dad doesn't care and just wants to watch the weather on NECN) and this guy's brother should be glad his brother had to send the thing back...maybe he'll spend enough money to get a quality product this time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:55:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004546</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004546" />
    <title>Comment from NeverLetMeDown on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>NeverLetMeDown</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>There's not a "no questions asked" return policy - refunds have a 15% restocking fee.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:54:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004543</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004543" />
    <title>Comment from Brazell on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Brazell</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hate to say it, but it says in clear black print when buying a TV from NewEgg that it has to have more than 8 dead pixels to be considered worthy for free replacement.  Not only that, but 8 dead pixels out of 2,073,600 pixels is not 97%, more like 0.0003% if my math serves me right (which it may not)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:53:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004542</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004542" />
    <title>Comment from Tiaris on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tiaris</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Horray for singular anecdotal "evidence"!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:53:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004538</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004538" />
    <title>Comment from Tiaris on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tiaris</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>>>I have only had great experiences doing business with them in the past, but this is the last time I buy anything from them.</p>

<p>So after ONE experience where you are at fault, *and they still made an exception for you*, you will not buy from them again?  Well, I have to say I don't think TheEgg needs customers like you =/</p>

<p>I have NEVER had a bad experience with NewEgg in the 9 years I've purchased from them.  Even on things I've had to return (as defective), I have read and complied with their policies and they have been fantastic about taking care of me.</p>

<p>It would take something incredibly drastic to drop them from my favor.  I guess having to actually work to get your way in a situation where you are in the wrong was "drastic" for you =/</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:50:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004530</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004530" />
    <title>Comment from GarretN on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>GarretN</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I generally really enjoy this site, however, I would like to say shame on Consumerist for this story.</p>

<p>NewEgg is very clear about it's return policy regarding dead pixels, which is pretty standard. Three dead pixels isn't enough for just about anyone to replace.</p>

<p>This isn't news, but it is misleading! NewEgg was in the right, and this story was in the wrong. Nobody forced this guys hand, and I hope someone notices the fib and denies the replacement.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:46:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004527</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004527" />
    <title>Comment from Ratty on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ratty</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>You'll also get hit with restocking fees for doing so at Best Buy on most larger ticket items.  That's why.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:43:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004520</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004520" />
    <title>Comment from Kitamura on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kitamura</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>That's the thing.  It does work, just not the way the OP wants it to.  I don't know what newegg offers, but I know some online retailers offer pixel protection warranty which allows you to return the product even if you only have 1 dead pixel.  But adds a considerable sum to the checkout price to have that peace of mind.  If you don't want to pay it, you have to deal with the accepted industry failure rate of 8 pixels.</p>

<p>The fact that they make you click the "I Agree" to a section that spells this out in plain English, generally in large different colored text and is shown in your face at multiple screens throughout the buying process makes this complaint just scream of entitlement.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:41:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004518</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004518" />
    <title>Comment from dfens42 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>dfens42</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Not only do I hope they send him the same monitor back, I hope they charge him shipping both ways for trying to game the system.  It's in the return policy, clear as day, and you have to read/check it off whenever you buy something it applies to if I am not mistaken.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:39:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004514</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004514" />
    <title>Comment from AirIntake on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>AirIntake</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I got a Samsung LN40A550 a year and a half ago from Best Buy for $900CAD. Newegg didn't and still can't beat that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:37:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004511</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004511" />
    <title>Comment from AirIntake on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>AirIntake</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Everybody can get cheap 0 dead pixel displays. It's call shopping at Best Buy and returning the display until you get one with 0 dead pixels. They have a 30 day return policy for a reason.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:34:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004506</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004506" />
    <title>Comment from morlo on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>morlo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Newegg is at a disadvantage when it comes to LCDs (even if you are lucky and get a perfect screen you'll probably be disappointed with how it looks). But BB also has a 2x markup on most items compared to newegg</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:30:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004505</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004505" />
    <title>Comment from AirIntake on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>AirIntake</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Except brick and mortar stores have 30 day return policies. I don't even have to tell them why I'm returning the product. Dead pixels is a perfectly good reason to exercise the no questions asked return policy. Newegg not having a 30 day no questions asked return policy is not good for the consumer.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:30:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004501</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004501" />
    <title>Comment from golddog on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>golddog</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yeah and I have to say, as someone who recently bought a 46" Samsung LCD from Newegg (with zero dead pixels btw) they go out of their way to remind you of the 8 dead pixel policy. You know what I can't find though is Amazon's dead pixel policy.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:29:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004499</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004499" />
    <title>Comment from AirIntake on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>AirIntake</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>But at Best Buy I have 30 days to return anything, no questions asked, after I've had a chance to inspect it. Why is Newegg so good for the consumer when they don't have this?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:27:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004495</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004495" />
    <title>Comment from AirIntake on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>AirIntake</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>How can you say Newegg is in the right here when they should have a 30 day no questions asked return policy, like evil Best Buy has?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:24:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004493</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004493" />
    <title>Comment from Mknzybsofh on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mknzybsofh</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Something else I should add. You get what you pay for. You did not state how much you paid for your LCD panel, but the cheaper they are the more problems they have. If you want perfect you should go spend 3k or more on it. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:24:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004491</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004491" />
    <title>Comment from AirIntake on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>AirIntake</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wow, a lot of people are defending Newegg here, why? Doesn't Newegg have a no questions asked return period? If not, that's a severe disadvantage to buying from Newegg. When I buy an HDTV from Best Buy I have 30 days to return it no questions asked. The first thing I do is display a full white screen and look for dead pixels. If I have any I return the set under their no questions asked policy and buy another one until I get one with 0 dead pixels. It seems this time, Best Buy is better for the consumer.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:22:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004486</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004486" />
    <title>Comment from squirrel on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>squirrel</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Based on my experiences buying LCD panels, quite a lot of them come through with no flaws at all.  Knowing what I have bought in the past few years includes 7 large panels for computer displays and 2 LCD HDTV's and non of them have dead/stuck pixels.  A glance around the office here shows dozens of Dell LCD screens and none of them have dead/stuck pixels.</p>

<p>Somehow I am doubting the OP had an issue with dead pixels. I'm betting it's stuck pixels, which are highly annoying - even if it is just one - if you ever had a chance to see them.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:19:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004480</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004480" />
    <title>Comment from Fred E. on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Fred E.</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes, you can usally fix a dead pixel.  You just take a ballpoint pen, lead pencil with a dull point, phillips screw driver, or similar, and gently massage the dead pixel. That's what's worked for me  but there are other methods:  <a href="http://www.wikihow.com/Fix-a-Stuck-Pixel-on-an-LCD-Monitor" rel="nofollow">http://www.wikihow.com/Fix-a-Stuck-Pixel-on-an-LCD-Monitor</a></p>

<p>And yes, the consumer was wrong to subvert the warranty.  There is an allowable number of dead pixels.  Some manufacturers take into account the location and proximity of dead pixels--a cluster in the center of the screen is much worse than scattered ones at the edges.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:16:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004475</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004475" />
    <title>Comment from Mknzybsofh on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mknzybsofh</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Oh go cry me a river. The 'Dead or bright pixel' policy has been around since the dawn of LCD panels. I remember arguing with customers over getting RMA's all the time for this sort of thing. THEY HAPPEN. You are never going to get a 100% perfect LCD panel every time. Hell my brand new LCD panel has one bright pixel, I kept it because the damn thing works perfectly otherwise.</p>

<p>FOR SHAME to consumerist for posting this as well. The OP lied, it was not like Newegg was doing anything wrong or predatory.</p>

<p>Hey OP need some cheese to go along with your whine?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:11:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004474</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004474" />
    <title>Comment from HalOfBorg on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>HalOfBorg</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'll save you a seat.</p>

<p>My family and I LOVE one type of Plantronics headset. Absolutely wonderful - except they break after a few months.</p>

<p>So the old one goes in the new box, and back to Circuit City (back when they were open). I guess I helped hasten them to their demise.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:11:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004469</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004469" />
    <title>Comment from mykie on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>mykie</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Samsung has had a "Zero Dead Pixel" policy for 4 years, it's hard to believe that in this day and age with the way LCD technology has matured that this policy hasn't been adopted by more manufacturers.</p>

<p>Granted, I think lying to subvert a "restrictive return policy" is unscrupulous, I'm pretty sure the OPs expectations are reasonable.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:10:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004467</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004467" />
    <title>Comment from Cant_stop_the_rock on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cant_stop_the_rock</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's ok because they "forced his hand."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:09:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004465</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004465" />
    <title>Comment from Browncoat101 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Browncoat101</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree with the idea that if you buy something new, it should be working. I don't get so hard to follow through with that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:07:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004460</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004460" />
    <title>Comment from kcvaliant on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>kcvaliant</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>wouldn't be able to tell much of a difference on a 19" anyway.. Just a good refresh rate is all that matters..</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T18:04:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004448</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004448" />
    <title>Comment from madtube on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>madtube</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>As many others have pointed out, the dead pixel policy is at the request of the manufacturer.  Newegg's rep was doing exactly what she was supposed to be doing and did it correctly.  I have never had a problem with anything I ever had to RMA.  The OP should have checked the warranty and researched the brand before buying.  There is a good possibility that he may have purchased a cheaper brand.</p>

<p>Bottom line is, do your homework first.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:57:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004446</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004446" />
    <title>Comment from Ceolwulf on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ceolwulf</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If anyone has a problem with stuck pixels (pixels stuck at a color other than black), here's a youtube video that should fix them. WARNING: do not open if you have epilepsy or sensitivity to flashing colors.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liMySLZkF5o" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liMySLZkF5o</a></p>

<p>If a pixel is stuck at black, it's dead. There's no fix for that, sadly. :(</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:56:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004443</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004443" />
    <title>Comment from [MG]LooseCannon on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>[MG]LooseCannon</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>"If I buy a new screen I expect it to be in 100% working condition and 97.5% is not acceptable."</p>

<p>Unfortunately, that's just the way of the world.  You CAN get 100% working every time LCD displays - they're called "medical grade" and they run in the 10K and up price range.  For the rest of us who don't have as critical of a need, they offer screens that are made to a less exacting standard, that are, as a result, a lot less expensive, but that are expected to have up to 8 dead pixels as a normal part of the manufacturing process.  </p>

<p>On top of this, when you go to Newegg.com and select an LCD screen, there's a tab right there that says "returns & rebates" that clearly states the "8 or more" policy.  So right there you know to expect that you will have dead pixels.  </p>

<p>MOST manufacturers consider dead pixels in the center of the screen to be worse than "normal" dead pixels, and generally 3 will be enough for a return if they're all in the center.</p>

<p>Not to blame the OP, but if he knew that 8 or less was considered normal for that product, bought it anyway, then lied to return it when it arrived exactly as described (less than 8 dead pixels), I think this is more a case of "bad consumer".</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:55:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004441</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004441" />
    <title>Comment from dbirney on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>dbirney</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I certainly feel for the OP here.  i myself bought a monitor and it had a total of one dead pixel.  That is not enough to return it, but unfortunately my pixel is just about an inch down from dead center.  I had hoped I would get used to it, but I stare at at all the time and it has been two years now.   I realize however that they are pretty standard and you cant expect them to refunded for one or two or three no matter how annoyingly placed. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:55:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004438</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004438" />
    <title>Comment from spazztastic on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>spazztastic</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It depends on where they are.  Out in the corner of the screen, not so much.  In the middle, very much so.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:52:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004436</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004436" />
    <title>Comment from Wang_Chung_Tonight on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Wang_Chung_Tonight</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>dude, if you can see 3 distinct pixels in a TV you need to work for TV companies. Are you sur eits just 3 pixels?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:52:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004435</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004435" />
    <title>Comment from Tulisin on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tulisin</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sorry, not worth the 30 % markup (not to mention gas/transportation money) to save those </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:50:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004430</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004430" />
    <title>Comment from haoshufu on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>haoshufu</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>OP should have asked more specific questions on dead pixels returen policy.  It is true that most manufacturers require a specific number of dead pixels before they will RMA the product and retailers are binding with those policies.  Retailers don't want to get stuck with those returns if the manufacturer won't take it back.</p>

<p>However, there is a caveat to these policies.  Many manufacturers will specify a number of dead pixels but will also consider the positions of the dead pixels.  If the dead pixels are toward the center of the screen where they will be more protrude to viewing, they will accept return on lesser number of them.  In the case when they said 8, when the dead pixels are ALL around the center of the screen and close to each other, they might have an exception to take it back.  Should call the manufacturer directly to confirm.  If you get a tech support ticket from the manufacturer and present it to the retailer, they will be more willing to accept the return.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:47:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004428</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004428" />
    <title>Comment from Anton_Jackson on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anton_Jackson</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hate to say it he's gaming the system, While I sympathize with him -- it sucks to have a defect like that, he is definitely in the wrong here. It is pretty clearly stated on the site what the criteria for a warranty return is, he knew it before he bought it. If he could not accept that criteria he should have bought it elsewhere.  </p>

<p>I find it ironic on this site when a company rips off the consumer its a cause for lynching the company( which is usually correct), but when the consumer defrauds the company its a cause for celebration( almost always, even when the customer is in the wrong and knows it).  Mind you, the balance of power is such that we consumers have to take our victories where we can, but its cases when we cross the line like this that tends to push retailers to move the line away from liberal policies and toward more restrictive ones. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:45:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004427</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004427" />
    <title>Comment from Preyfar on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Preyfar</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I'm REALLY disappointed Consumerist is backing this sort of behavior. Newegg is one of the best companies I've ever had to deal with. Ever. Next to Woot.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:44:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004426</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004426" />
    <title>Comment from fishy007 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>fishy007</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm going to hazard a guess here and say that  Israel didn't know the difference between a dead pixel and a CLUSTER of dead pixels.  If he noticed 3 sets in the middle of the screen right away, then it's likely that there were 3 clusters amounting to way over the 8 dead pixels. </p>

<p>I've been through this myself. I bought a Viewsonic monitor a few years ago and found what I thought was a single dead pixel in the corner. After some research, I realized it was a small cluster containing several dead pixels. A single dead pixel is very difficult to notice on a high resolution monitor. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:43:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004424</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004424" />
    <title>Comment from rihan on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>rihan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Most companies have this same policy however from what I've seen its something to the effect of 8-12 pixels total, or if 2-4 are side by side.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:42:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004420</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004420" />
    <title>Comment from rekoil on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>rekoil</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>What @squirrel said. Dead pixels are pretty hard to notice - you really have to be looking for them to find them. I'm suspecting the tipster was referring to stuck pixels, which are *much* more distracting and IMO should be grounds for a return if any are present, even if it's only one.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:40:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004414</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004414" />
    <title>Comment from macdude22 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>macdude22</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's hardly even fine print, they post it in regular size print under the warranty and returns section. They've actually gone out of their way to make sure you're informed about the situation, which is more than I can say for most other retailers (both online and brick/mortar)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:38:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004410</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004410" />
    <title>Comment from shepd on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>shepd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The numbers are actually even bigger.  Remember, there's three sub-pixels on each pixel (red, green, and blue), and in the vast majority of cases, you only get sub-pixel failure.</p>

<p>That gives the TV 3,888,000 sub-pixels, of which 3 failed, or over 99.9999% perfection.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:36:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004409</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004409" />
    <title>Comment from Loias on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Loias</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Every LCD TV manufacturer/retailer disclaimer I have seen gives a specific threshhold for TV repaIr in regard to dead pixels. Bottom line, I believe Newegg probably did have that verbage stating they will not replace unless a certain nuumber of pixels are broken. This is the buyer's fault for not reading the fine print.</p>

<p>Solution? Buy Plasma, although with a 19in it'sn not worth the money, if you even can.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:36:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004408</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004408" />
    <title>Comment from Preyfar on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Preyfar</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yep, I agree. Sounds like this guy didn't read the warranty, and was an abusive customer who lied to get his way. While dead pixels are the epitome of suck, what this guy did was NOT kosher.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:35:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004407</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004407" />
    <title>Comment from tackhouse1 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>tackhouse1</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Like others have said, it stinks to have a few dead pixel's on a new display, but NewEgg clearly states the 8 dead pixel requirement in their policy (the vast majority of retailers have similar policies).</p>

<p>Not sure where the he did his math, but 3 dead pixels is not a 97.5% working display, even assuming only 720p resolution (1280x720) that’s still 99.99967% working...</p>

<p>Also maybe not the smartest idea admitting to the internet that you lied to the CSR about how many pixels are dead.  NewEgg's a good e-Tailer, but it would almost serve him right if NewEgg rejected the return....<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:34:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004404</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004404" />
    <title>Comment from angelwolf71885 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>angelwolf71885</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>given that pixels are the size of a pin head a few dead pixels is nothing to complain about</p>

<p>if you want 100% perfection then git a tube TV and im talking abut CRT not plasma</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:33:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004403</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004403" />
    <title>Comment from thompson on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>thompson</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sure, it could be the manufacturer's problem -- if you want to pay 10x the cost for the same LCD panel. If they had to throw out every panel with a few dead pixels the cost to manufacturer would SKYROCKET. It's an inherent problem with the technology, and it's possible to mitigate, but for most people the cost isn't worth the benefit.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:33:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004399</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004399" />
    <title>Comment from thompson on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>thompson</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Not only subvert the warranty, but lie to Newegg -- a company that is almost always pro-consumer and has a very liberal return/exchange policy on most things. As as been mentioned elsewhere, the 8-pixel policy is CLEARLY spelled out multiple times on the website and at most stages of the ordering process.</p>

<p>Why is it okay for consumers to lie and cheat companies, but it's a sin for companies to lie and cheat their customers? C'mon Consumerist, you're losing the moral high ground here!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:29:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004398</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004398" />
    <title>Comment from TCama on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>TCama</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If 3 dead pixels means only 97.5% of the pixels are working, that means the monitor has 120 pixels. I certainly hope it has more than that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:28:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004395</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004395" />
    <title>Comment from floraposte on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>floraposte</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The problem is that that particular request often "works"--in that people whose cords weren't plugged in properly or at all then fix the problem that way.  I guess they get more people to deal with the cable with that instruction than if they just said "Check that the cords and cables are all firmly installed."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:26:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004393</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004393" />
    <title>Comment from macdude22 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>macdude22</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm not apologizing for cheapskate producers but to rag on NewEgg about this is ridiculous, they are more open about dead pixels in LCD's than any other retailer I've seen. It's right on the item pages for LCDs, 8 dead pixels for a return.</p>

<p>This kid scammed NewEgg period. If he's got a beef with the problem, tell him to take it up with the manufacturer. NewEgg told em right up front these things can have dead pixels, I don't see best buy, or walmart, or anyone else doing the same.</p>

<p>Maybe consumerist can direct it's "restrictive" comment toward the actual villain here, the manufacturers. NewEgg has always done right by me when I've had problems, but I've never tried to subvert industry standard practices by lieing to them. </p>

<p>Consumerist, you also should retract your statement about newegg, you certainly sound like you are promoting lying to them to resolve an issue that is wholly not their problem.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:24:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004385</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004385" />
    <title>Comment from SkuldChan on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>SkuldChan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Another thing to watch NewEgg for is they have like 3 or 4 seperate return policies, and they use them on different items. Some items (the more lemony ones) are repair/replace only for instance.</p>

<p>Many refurbished items are almost always replace only - so watch out before you buy from them.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:19:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004374</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004374" />
    <title>Comment from Guppy06 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Guppy06</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yeah, he lied, but what's with all the LCD apologists?  If it's difficult for manufacturers to make sure all the pixels are working, that should be their problem, not the consumers'.  At the very least, if consumers should expect dead pixels as "part of buying an LCD," then it should be loudly proclaimed on the packaging and advertising (not some fine print or click-through legalese).  Saying that a display is capable of 1920 x 1080 should mean just that, not 1920 x 1080 - 3.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:13:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004373</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004373" />
    <title>Comment from QuantumRiff on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>QuantumRiff</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If its a 19" computer monitor, and runs 1280x1024 resolution (which is pretty standard for square monitors)</p>

<p>then its 3/1310720, or 0.0002288818359375%  Which is pretty teeny!</p>

<p>a widescreen monitor (1440x900 is very common) would be slightly larger percent, there are about 100,000 less pixels...<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:13:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004370</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004370" />
    <title>Comment from macdude22 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>macdude22</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This isn't a Newegg thing it's an industry thing. 8 dead pixels is usually what it takes to get the manufacture to replace it. NewEgg can't be eating the cost of LCD panels like that. </p>

<p>I was always impressed by nintendo with the DS, i had 1 dead pixel and they bent over backwards to get the screen replaced. My boss had a PSP with 3 dead pixels and sony told him they wouldn't replace the screen unless it had 4 or more, or 2 directly in the center.</p>

<p>Granted this is why I buy TV's at Costco, you can pretty much return it for just about any reason, if it were to have dead pixels.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:11:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004361</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004361" />
    <title>Comment from Admiral_John on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Admiral_John</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I seriously hope Newegg turns it on, sees only three and sends it right back to him. Newegg is one of the best companies to deal with, both in terms of customer service and price, and when people pull stunts like this it's just another drop in the bucket of things that will one day just make them another bestbuy.com.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:07:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004360</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004360" />
    <title>Comment from NeverLetMeDown on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>NeverLetMeDown</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>"I buy a new screen I expect it to be in 100% working condition and 97.5% is not acceptable."</p>

<p>Israel also needs to learn some math.  Assuming the TV is something like this: <a href="http://www.newegg.com/product/product.aspx?Item=N82E16889107041" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/product/product.aspx?Item=N82E16889107041</a></p>

<p>Then it's 1440x900, or 1,296,000 pixels, so 3 dead pixels is 99.9998% right, and 8 dead pixels is 99.9994% right.  </p>

<p>97.5% right would be 32,400 dead pixels.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:06:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004358</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004358" />
    <title>Comment from Admiral_John on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Admiral_John</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Depending on the resolution of the monitor those three pixels account for an incredibly tiny percentage of pixels that aren't working, and has been pointed out by others manufacturers set what is they will consider acceptable for dead/stuck pixels. </p>

<p>Sorry, but OP is in the wrong here. It's unfortunate but dead pixels are something that happens with LCD TV's. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:06:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004347</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004347" />
    <title>Comment from KCBassCadet on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>KCBassCadet</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yep, we do.  But not LCD's.  Anything that risks having a dead pixel = always, always, always buy locally and pony up the extra $$$.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:02:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004346</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004346" />
    <title>Comment from Segador on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Segador</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>To certain people, it would be super annoying, especially on a TV as small as 19 inches. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:02:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004345</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004345" />
    <title>Comment from masso on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>masso</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>You must be joking...</p>

<p>LCD monitor is a special case precisely because of dead pixel.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:02:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004344</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004344" />
    <title>Comment from morlo on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>morlo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Exchange and you'll get one with 4 dead pixels. Also your brother really wanted a 24-incher</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:01:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004343</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004343" />
    <title>Comment from mikemil828 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>mikemil828</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>//It wasn't right of Israel to lie, but NewEgg's restrictive return policy basically forced his hand.//</p>

<p>Wow, the consumer in this case is clearly in the wrong and the Consumerist is trying to be sympathetic to his cause, makes me wonder how low someone has to go for this blog to be unable to back him up.</p>

<p>Anyway hope Newegg hits him up for the 15% restocking fee</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:01:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004340</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004340" />
    <title>Comment from treimel on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>treimel</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>That's pretty diffeent though; you simply omitted boiler plate "repair" steps experience told you were bs.  This OP fabricated a problem that didn't exist.  (i.e, to the tune of five pixels.) To be analagous, you'd have to have lied about a problem the computer was having, not the steps to repair it.<br />
What you did wasn't great, what the OP did was awful. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T17:00:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004336</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004336" />
    <title>Comment from KCBassCadet on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>KCBassCadet</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>And this kind of baloney is exactly why I never buy sensitive (read: LCD tv's and monitors) merchandise from online vendors. Too much risk and hassle involved if a return is required.</p>

<p>With a brick and mortar store, you can return the TV if you just don't like the way the bezel looks. Usually without any restocking fee, as well.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:59:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004334</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004334" />
    <title>Comment from Hogan1 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Hogan1</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Actually real "PC enthusiasts" frequently buy from Newegg..... </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:57:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004331</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004331" />
    <title>Comment from hlpimfalling on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>hlpimfalling</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If he returned it yes, but I believe if he wanted a replacement no.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:57:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004322</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004322" />
    <title>Comment from squirrel on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>squirrel</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Dead or stuck pixels?</p>

<p>Dead pixels are a bummer, but they remain dark.  These can actually be lived with.  Stuck pixels - those that shine brightly in red, green or blue are a royal PITA and should be considered a defect.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:52:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004320</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004320" />
    <title>Comment from dkev on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>dkev</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It is common knowledge amongst us PC enthusiast that you never order LCD's from New Egg.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:52:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004318</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004318" />
    <title>Comment from Hairyblackdude on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Hairyblackdude</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>There are videos designed to fix dead pixels. You can check them out on Youtube. <br />
They are used to wake up pixels- won't fix black ones, just ones stuck on a color. If you have a PS3, you can use the browser to view on your TV. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:51:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004317</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004317" />
    <title>Comment from JennQPublic on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>JennQPublic</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've done this too. Especially when tech support asks me to reverse my ethernet cable, because the problem might just be that it's plugged in backwards. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:51:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004314</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004314" />
    <title>Comment from JennQPublic on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>JennQPublic</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Shameful is right! Newegg's defective pixel policy is <i>very</i> clearly stated on their site- I've never bought an LCD from them, but I've seen it a million times. If you don't think those are reasonable terms, then you should have taken your business elsewhere. </p>

<p>Next time I buy something from Newegg and the price is a little higher than I remember, I'll know who to blame. </p>

<p>Thanks Israel, for lying to screw one of the few <i>good</i> companies out there.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:49:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004311</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004311" />
    <title>Comment from anthonyparrott@gmail.com on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>anthonyparrott@gmail.com</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've lied to HP a couple of times while on the phone with them. I know what the problem is but they want me to do a system restore, a WIndows Repair, and a defrag before they admit it's a hardware problem. I say I'm doing these things, but just browse online for an appropriate amount of time instead. When they ask if it fixed the problem, I, of course, answer now. I understand the policy, I just sometimes want to avoid it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:47:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004310</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004310" />
    <title>Comment from RedCatLinux on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>RedCatLinux</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The pixel policy has been around a while. Probably since flat screens became more and more popular and affordable. This warranty limitation is also not unique to the Egg - Israel is going to have a time trying to buy a similar product elsewhere without that caveat. </p>

<p>I can't say I blame him - it's something jarring about a fixed pixel on a brand new screen. Your eyes are stuck to it once you notice the thing. </p>

<p>I did lie once to a shop. I bought a wireless controller for a game console and two months later dropped the transmitter three feet onto carpeted floor. It never worked again. No return or exchange. I purchased a new controller and swapped the transmitters and returned the new controller with the broken transmitter for a refund. </p>

<p>I know. I'm going to hell.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:47:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004309</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004309" />
    <title>Comment from Thrashy on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Thrashy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this reminds me of the selfish way that a lot of PC overclockers used to game the warranty system until the got a processor with lots of "headroom."  It's unethical and it's fraudulent, but people do it anyway because they feel they're "owed" something above and beyond the stated specifications of the product.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:47:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004308</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004308" />
    <title>Comment from hlpimfalling on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>hlpimfalling</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This isn't newegg's policy, this is a per manufacturer policy.  Newegg has to make some money too ya know.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:46:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004303</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004303" />
    <title>Comment from Megalomania on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Megalomania</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Assuming it really is a TV and not a monitor, it's almost definitely 720p and not 1080p, or 99.9997%.  That said, dead pixels are incredibly annoying.  Across the displays I've bought in the past year I've purchased 8.6 million pixels but I would still get pissed if I had a display with a dead or stuck pixel.  They're very noticeable, and every time you notice it you feel cheated (had a bad experience prior to this year...)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:46:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004297</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004297" />
    <title>Comment from Blueskylaw on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Blueskylaw</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>When I bought a new car, the dealer told me that unless it had 8 or more dents in it, or a windshield crack longer than four inches I could not return the car.</p>

<p>/sarcasm</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:44:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004296</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004296" />
    <title>Comment from Nogard13 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nogard13</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I had this issue with Best Buy a few years back.  I purchased an LCD and even their 3-year warranty thingy (it was offered for $10 more, so I did it).  A year later, I had 4 dead pixels near the center (they were always glowing red).  I took it back to get replaced/repaird and I was told, at the time, that it had to have 5 dead pixels.  I was pissed, but now that I think about it, having a few dead pixels on a TV wouldn't be that bad (especially since you're sitting at least 5 feet away from it so they shouldn't be that visible).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:43:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004295</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004295" />
    <title>Comment from Thrashy on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Thrashy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>As others have noted, this is par for the course with display warranties.  The manufacturing process is such that if they were to reject every LCD with a dead pixel it'd be a nightmare.  Newegg lists their return policy right up front under the "Returns & Rebates" what their policy is, and you're free to shop or not not shop with that in mind.  Manufacturer policy on this varies, though (Samsung, for one, does actually guarantee zero dead pixels in the LCD monitors), so one might have more success dealing directly with them rather the reseller.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:43:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004291</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004291" />
    <title>Comment from Hogan1 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Hogan1</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Please understand the products before making such posts. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:42:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004287</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004287" />
    <title>Comment from Taliskan on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Taliskan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>On 42" Samsung plasma I had 4 dead pixels clumped dead center of the screen.  BestBuy nor Samsung would replace it unless it had 12 or more.  The set ended up being a lemon in the end (something with the panel was broken) and I ended up with a replacement.  But these dead pixel policies have been around a long time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:41:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004286</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004286" />
    <title>Comment from chicagojim on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>chicagojim</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I just purchased a 32" TV from Newegg and not once, not twice, but three times before checkout the link appeared to read the policy on returning a product for dead pixels - 8 was the count for my TV.  I feel they are being extremely forthcoming on their policy.  Not sure what elase they could do to be moreclear.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:41:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004285</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004285" />
    <title>Comment from Hogan1 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Hogan1</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This has been a long standing Policy by Newegg and it's CLEARLY stated on the product page, the checkout screen, and the invoice when you buy and LCD. Whenever you buy an LCD you run the risk of dead pixels. I always reccomend doing research on a product before you buy. </p>

<p>But yeah props to the OP on being a liar. Newegg is one of the best retailers on the web and quite frankly it's upsetting that the OP would take the path of essentially commiting fraud. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:41:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004284</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004284" />
    <title>Comment from LastError on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>LastError</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wow, so the consumer lied and cheated to get their way?</p>

<p>How many stories on Consumerist are about stores doing that to customers, and now a customer is doing it back to the store?   No wonder stores adopt draconian policies that make it hard for everyone to shop. </p>

<p>Thanks, Israel, for being a jerk and ripping off Newegg.  You got your replacement TV.  Screw honesty.  Screw integrity.  You get what YOU wanted.   </p>

<p>Shameful. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:41:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004283</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004283" />
    <title>Comment from bonzombiekitty on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>bonzombiekitty</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>sure it's a warranty issue.  The warranty and terms of exchange are clearly stated in the listing.  If he didn't agree, then he shouldn't have bought the item.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:40:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004280</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004280" />
    <title>Comment from Alvarez on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alvarez</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yeah it's a common thing. It really sucks in this case though cause the TV is relatively small at "19 and the pixels are in the center of the screen. When the LCD is big and they're kinda off to the side it's not as noticeable.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:40:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004278</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004278" />
    <title>Comment from shepd on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>shepd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>You can purchase screens with zero defects, however, you pay a lot more.  If people were willing to pay, say, $5000 for a 40" LCD TV, they'd get zero dead pixels.  However, people want to pay less, and to pay less you get lower quality.</p>

<p>If you speak with the manufacturer before buying, or just surf their website, you'll find most of them are open about their dead pixel policies.  You'll also find different policies for different price bands of LCDs.  The more you pay, the fewer dead pixels (as low as zero) are considered acceptable.</p>

<p>This isn't unusual for any product, quite frankly.  Even food and medication are subject to it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:40:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004274</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004274" />
    <title>Comment from KD17 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>KD17</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well it their Television Standard Return Policy does state: </p>

<p>Standard Computer Return Policy</p>

<p>    * Return for refund within: non-refundable<br />
    * Return for replacement within: 30 days<br />
    * There must be a minimum of 8 dead pixels to declare an LCD display defective and eligible for return.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:38:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004271</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004271" />
    <title>Comment from UCLAri on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>UCLAri</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's not an issue of cheap manufacturing, and the product is not "damaged."  It's a product of LCDs all being prone to this.  It's nearly impossible to have every single LCD out there without dead pixels.  This is pretty common, even among the "best" LCDs.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:38:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004270</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004270" />
    <title>Comment from FatLynn on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>FatLynn</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>And consumers are willing to pay extra to avoid "cheap manufacturing"?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:38:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004267</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004267" />
    <title>Comment from masso on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>masso</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Oh, May be I'm wrong, but aren't most Newegg purchase come with no-question-ask RMA policy within a period (with a restocking fee that is). I know I did return a Wifi Router once when I found out it's not needed with my current wifi adapter.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:37:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004262</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004262" />
    <title>Comment from wetrat on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>wetrat</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Actually, when you buy a product like this on Newegg, they spell out the return policy just prior to checkout, and below the return policy is a box marked something like "I Agree", which the OP would have had to check.  So I don't really feel sorry for the OP here... 3 dead pixels on an HD screen is way too few to be considered a defect.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:34:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004260</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004260" />
    <title>Comment from masso on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>masso</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I guess I could sympathize with having dead pixel right in the middle, but that's the risk that comes with buying LCD, HDTV. But Newegg is usually very lenient, I think he/she could have talked with Newegg out of this.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:34:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004259</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004259" />
    <title>Comment from henrygates3 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>henrygates3</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's not really a warranty issue. The product was damaged on arrival, so its an issue with NewEgg's defective exchange policy. I also would fully expect the product to be working 100% out of the box. That dead pixels is a result of cheap manufacturing doesn't excuse it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:33:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004255</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004255" />
    <title>Comment from pdxazn on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>pdxazn</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>What a picky guy!  I would hate to do any kind of business with him.  Put him on a black list.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:32:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004254</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004254" />
    <title>Comment from shepd on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>shepd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>And, for those wondering, here's an example of "proof" (This is for Asus, who has a very generous dead pixel policy, which makes sense since these are rules for computer monitors):</p>

<p><a href="http://support.asus.com/repair/repair.aspx?no=536&SLanguage=en-us" rel="nofollow">http://support.asus.com/repair/repair.aspx?no=536&SLanguage=en-us</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:31:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004253</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004253" />
    <title>Comment from icanswim2002 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>icanswim2002</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>actually assuming the screen res is 1080p, there are 99.999% working pixels which is pretty good...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:31:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004250</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004250" />
    <title>Comment from post_break on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>post_break</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well when you consider the amount of pixels that are on that TV the LCD manufacturer can't reject every panel with a few dead pixels, there would be a ton of waste. Sure, the 8 pixel minimum sucks, but there's a reason for it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:30:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004248</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004248" />
    <title>Comment from dragonfire81 on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>dragonfire81</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm not an HDTV expert but would three dead pixels really impact the viewing experience that much? </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:29:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004247</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004247" />
    <title>Comment from bonzombiekitty on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>bonzombiekitty</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Isn't the dead pixel thing pretty standard?  I've seen/ordered LCD screens of one sort or another from multiple websites and they've all said something like "no returns for dead pixels if there are less than $X dead pixels".  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:29:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269-comment:20004244</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000269" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/newegg-told-me-my-monitor-isnt-broken-enough-to-return.html#c20004244" />
    <title>Comment from shepd on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>shepd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Depending on the manufacturer, you will find each one specifies how many dead pixels is acceptable.  For a majority of manufacturers, 3 is actually acceptable and not covered by warranty.</p>

<p>Sorry, but it is likely the OP is trying to subvert the warranty on the product he bought.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T16:28:08Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



