<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T10:16:35Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Meet &apos;The Imaginary Refund Policy&apos; From Hammacher Schlemmer</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=10000206" title="Meet 'The Imaginary Refund Policy' From Hammacher Schlemmer" />
    <published>2009-11-25T00:59:02Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-26T03:17:55Z</updated>
    <title>Meet &apos;The Imaginary Refund Policy&apos; From Hammacher Schlemmer</title>
    <summary>It turns out Hammacher Schlemmer doesn&apos;t want their goofy products any more than you do. Tanya in Canada has been trying for a month to get a refund on a product she felt didn&apos;t live up to its promise, but the company won&apos;t even acknowledge whether they&apos;ve received it. Update: Hammacher Schlemmer has responded, and issued the refund. I purchased a &quot;headache relieving wrap&quot; from Hammacher Schlemmer. When it arrived I discovered that it was pictured backwards in the catalogue and that the picture therefore concealed a large uncomfortable plastic D-ring incorporated into the closure. It arrived with a (not...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Chris Walters</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term=" Returns and Exchanges" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>It turns out Hammacher Schlemmer doesn't want their goofy products any more than you do. Tanya in Canada has been trying for a month to get a refund on a product she felt didn't live up to its promise, but the company won't even acknowledge whether they've received it.  <b>Update:</b> Hammacher Schlemmer has responded, and <a href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/hammacher-schlemmer-helps-consumerist-reader-with-refund.html">issued the refund</a>.</p>

<blockquote><p>I purchased a <a href="http://www.hammacher.com/Product/76528?promo=search">"headache relieving wrap"</a> from Hammacher Schlemmer.  When it arrived I discovered that it was pictured backwards in the catalogue and that the picture therefore concealed a large uncomfortable plastic D-ring incorporated into the closure.</p>

<p>It arrived with a (not prepaid) shipping label to use for returns.  The address on this label, for a broker who handles their cross-border shipping, apparently, was slightly different from the one listed on the website. I emailed the same day, October 31, to inquire which address was correct and whether they required a traceable method when shipping returns. No reply.</p>

<p>I sent the same question through their website a few days later.  No reply. I sent the item with the label provided and signature required on delivery. I then emailed again on November 8th indicating I was unhappy to have received no reply and asking how long I could expect it to take to process my refund. They replied indicating 7-10 business days.</p>

<p>On November 10th I received delivery confirmation from Canada Post and logged online to view it only to find that in the signature box, someone had written "refused to sign". On November 12th I sent the PDF along with the entire previous chain of emails asking if they could confirm my return was being processed. I received a reply requesting my order number (which was included in the previous email) and stating that "they could not locate my order with the information provided". I replied indicating that the order number and other information had been in the previous email but cut-and-pasted it at the top for their convenience. No reply.</p>

<p>I phoned and talked to someone at their 1-800 number who said that they "must have" gotten it, although it wasn't in the system. I asked if they would be willing to refund the charge I had paid for requesting a signature in view of the fact that I had written asking their shipping preferences before I sent it and that their broker refusing to sign was ludicrous as this was a way of ensuring that the package could be tracked. She stated they would be unable to begin to process a refund until the item showed up in the system but she would "put a note in my file".</p>

<p>I emailed again on November 18th quoting the previous emails, recapping the entire story, and requesting a refund of the signature charge as well as confirmation that they had received the package. No reply.</p>

<p>Do you have any EECB contact information for Hammacher Schlemmer?  I will already have to lose all the substantial shipping charges (2/3 the cost of the original item) for having this delivered in the first place, which I accept is a risk from ordering from this kind of outfit. However, when you make your business in dealing with luxury goods, and when you have such steep shipping charges for having a broker who specializes in cross-border deliveries, is it too much to expect to receive responses to inquiries or have someone sign for a return package when a signature is required?</blockquote>It is not too much to expect, Tanya. It is the minimum the company could do if they wanted to ensure customer satisfaction, and possibly repeat business. </p>

<p><br />Here's Hammacher Schlemmer's contact info according to Google Finance: </p>

<p>Hammacher Schlemmer & Co., Inc.  <br />
9307 N. Milwaukee Ave.<br />
Niles, IL 60714<br />
USA<br />
+1-847-581-8600 (Phone)<br />
847-581-8616 (Fax)</p>

<p>Executives: <br />
Richard (Rich) Tinberg, CEO<br />
Donald Q. (Don) Rogers, VP Operations<br />
Barry Orr, Senior Accounting Director</p>

<p>My advice, however, is that you should consider a chargeback if you paid by credit card.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20002375</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20002375" />
    <title>Comment from Awjvail on 2009-11-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Awjvail</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Oh *hell* no he doesn't. That'll just make it even worse.</p>

<p>The article needs a neutral party. Not someone who has a conflict of interest such as that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-26T06:06:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20002278</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20002278" />
    <title>Comment from twophrasebark on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>twophrasebark</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Floraposte: I can't agree. It seems like this reader has just gone way overboard in multiple contacts with HS. They tell her 7-10 business days to receive a credit. But then two days after she receives delivery confirmation she's contacting them again. For what? So they can tell her the geographic coordinates of where her package is? I can't prove it, but something about the multiple contacts and returning an item at nearly the cost of the item... I don't think we're getting the whole story. It doesn't sound right. This sounds like a seriously high maintenance individual with a self-fulfilling prophecy of a customer service problem. IMHO.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-26T01:17:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20002264</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20002264" />
    <title>Comment from DadCooks on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>DadCooks</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@FredBerns, you need to get someone, who is computer literate and knows your company, to fix the Wikipedia entry about HS:  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammacher_Schlemmer" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammacher_Schlemmer</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-26T00:18:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20002068</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20002068" />
    <title>Comment from jacques on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>jacques</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If I remember correctly, there's a whole compound for Bradford there.  Apparently they also have a number of other addresses so that customers can't figure out that the subcompany is one of theirs.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T18:51:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20002036</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20002036" />
    <title>Comment from Crabby Cakes on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Crabby Cakes</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I find it hilarious that a representative of this company has acknowledged that his company has screwed up and has provided personal information so that he can take care of this issue and you STILL found something minuscule to complain about.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T18:34:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001762</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001762" />
    <title>Comment from floraposte on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>floraposte</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>In ordinary circumstances, I'd agree.  But this is a company that's already failed to perform as promised, and she's sensibly treating them as screwups who can't simply be asked.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T15:26:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001761</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001761" />
    <title>Comment from pb5000 on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>pb5000</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think that's a minor error, if you're not a regular reader, this can be a common mistake.  The intent is there to make it right and I see the value in that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T15:23:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001746</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001746" />
    <title>Comment from msbask on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>msbask</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree. While there's no excuse for not responding to her original emails, she *barely* let enough time go by after they received her package.  And today, she posts that she emailed them three times between yesterday and today?</p>

<p>I'm not saying that she shouldn't have emailed them, just that stalking them is kind of going overboard.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T14:59:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001735</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001735" />
    <title>Comment from Blueskylaw on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Blueskylaw</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think that is a small mistake that can be forgiven, considering that everyone is still trying to get used to a re-designed site. </p>

<p>It does make good corporate sense that Hammacher Schlemmer is watching the boards to help disgruntled customers and get an overall feel for what people think about their corporate image and products.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T14:35:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001728</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001728" />
    <title>Comment from china_rider on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>china_rider</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm surprised by this also.  I've never shopped there but about 7 years ago I received a pair of Bose Quiet Comfort Headphones as a X-Mas gift.  The headphones had a pretty standard warranty but HS made it a life time one.  Every year like clockwork, no matter how careful I am, a plastic part on the arm of the headphones crack.  I've sent the pair back 6-7 times for full replacement with no problems.  That being said I'm not sending from Canada.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T14:13:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001725</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001725" />
    <title>Comment from 420greg on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>420greg</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well Fred, It appears you need some turnover in your customer service department. <br />
I would start with the person who refused to sign for the item, then everyone else that talked to this customer but did not offer a solution.</p>

<p>According to the WSJ there are 6 people out there who would take any one of these jobs, so know is a good time to make some changes. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T13:56:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001719</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001719" />
    <title>Comment from GreatWhiteNorth on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>GreatWhiteNorth</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>My house has been on the mailing list for their catalogue for ever it seems... I always look forward to seeing what innovative, odd, quirky, bizarre, and outrageous items they find.  </p>

<p>However, I must admit I am very rarely tempted to buy their stuff... until now... Seeing the post from Fred Berns is very good PR...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T13:40:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001716</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001716" />
    <title>Comment from Dave Terry on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dave Terry</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I find it hilarious you didn't even bother to check the article to figure out which name to fill in your apology template. Chris Walters just wrote up the article; it's Tanya you should be apologizing to.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T13:27:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001713</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001713" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Companies sometimes own buildings but don't occupy all the floors. They rent the unoccupied floors to other companies. Maybe this is the case? Is there any signage on the doors or the building indicating that in addition to Bradford Exchange, there is another company inside? </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T13:22:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001710</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001710" />
    <title>Comment from nbs2 on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>nbs2</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The problem is the "if she persists."  She shouldn't have to, and at this point she has gone above and beyond.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T13:08:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001709</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001709" />
    <title>Comment from FredBerns on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>FredBerns</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>

<p>My name is Fred Berns.  I am the General Manager of Hammacher Schlemmer.   I am shocked and embarrased to learn of your experience.  We pride ourselves on our superior level of customer service and our unconditional guarantee, which we have backed up for 161 years now.  (No, we never went out of business.  We're still going strong.)    As we work hard to answer most emails within one hour, I am concerned that we may have a technical issue (such as a spam filter) that is impacting delivery.</p>

<p>Please contact me directly and I will personally see to it that you are taken care.  Your experience is not representative of what Hammacher is all about, and I would appreciate the opportunity to make it right.  I can be reached at fberns@hammacher.com or 847-581-8914 (yes, this is my personal contact information).</p>

<p>P.S.  To clear up a few comments, as we are privately owned, there may not be much background information about our company on the web.  Our corporate offices are in the same building as The Bradford Exchange, but we are not owned by them.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T12:53:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001702</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001702" />
    <title>Comment from Melt on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Melt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have actually found HS to be pretty good with returns.  Bought a pressure washer from them as it had a bunch of accessories that others didn't offer and I knew about their lifetime warranty.  After three years, it broke, I got a label from them and for $7 return shipping (the thing weighed 30 pounds), they sent me a brand new one, no questions asked.  Not bad!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T11:54:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001689</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001689" />
    <title>Comment from humphrmi on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>humphrmi</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>So, where's her refund?  Or, should she wait longer?  How long?  Can H-S answer that?  Or, maybe she should wait 2-3 days <i>after</i> their estimate.  Or maybe 7-10.  Or, maybe give a realistic time frame up front?  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T07:57:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001655</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001655" />
    <title>Comment from twophrasebark on 2009-11-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>twophrasebark</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The OP is being kind of impatient.</p>

<p>According to her post, Hammacher received her item on November 10 and stated it would take 7-10 business days to process her refund.</p>

<p>The tenth business day was... yesterday.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T05:17:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001652</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001652" />
    <title>Comment from NotYou007 on 2009-11-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>NotYou007</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Just seeing if things are still working.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T04:53:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001647</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001647" />
    <title>Comment from Dutchess on 2009-11-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dutchess</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If HS allowed people to return their products after they realized how crappy they are they would never have any final sales. </p>

<p>My experience is their stuff is just as bad as the Sharper Image items I used to return all the time. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T04:41:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001625</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001625" />
    <title>Comment from nycdesigner on 2009-11-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>nycdesigner</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Same is true for Totes, but you have to mail it back. Also Saks has that policy with their brellies. The key is not to lose it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T03:44:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001618</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001618" />
    <title>Comment from scoobydoo on 2009-11-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>scoobydoo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Now that IS an interesting address - I've passed that building a lot, and it is the same building as the Bradford Exchange (the people who make plates and other collectibles). And sure enough - the HS site confirms that they are owned by Bradford. <a href="http://www.hammacher.com/Editorial/BradfordInternationalSites?promo=bottom_nav" rel="nofollow">http://www.hammacher.com/Editorial/BradfordInternationalSites?promo=bottom_nav</a></p>

<p>You learn something new every day here...</p>

<p>Oddly enough, there is absolutely no word about this on the Bradford Group site, but man that is one ugly web of weird companies...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T03:32:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001607</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001607" />
    <title>Comment from DadCooks on 2009-11-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>DadCooks</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Google-ing Hammacher Schlemmer in several ways (news, finance, reviews) turns up a whole lot of no substantive information and a lot of razzle-dazzle fluff. Their Wikipedia entry is also not reliable.</p>

<p>I seem to recall that Hammacher Schlemmer actually went out of business a few years back (like SharperImage) and someone bought its name to continue to sell "innovations" of dubious worth.</p>

<p>IMO, reviews that are good seem to be of questionable authenticity and there are a fair number of bad reviews that seem more genuine.</p>

<p>Hammacher Schlemmer does not seem to be what it once was.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T02:59:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001593</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001593" />
    <title>Comment from chocotanya on 2009-11-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>chocotanya</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's surprising to me, too (the OP) - but the number of times I have persisted is starting to seem excessive.  Not including the email I just sent them with a link to this story, I have sent 7 emails/website form submissions in the last 2 weeks since the item was shown as delivered, asking them to confirm that they have received it and that my refund is being processed, and requesting a refund of my postal signature fee.  </p>

<p>They would really have to go above and beyond at this point for me to ever be willing to order from them again...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T02:17:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001586</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001586" />
    <title>Comment from Chris Walters on 2009-11-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Walters</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Now I'm picturing your cleaning lady barreling through your home, arms akimbo. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T02:11:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001581</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001581" />
    <title>Comment from jpdanzig on 2009-11-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>jpdanzig</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This story surprises me.  Hammacher has one of the best guarantees in the business, and I have always found their customer service beyond reproach.  It's an open secret, for example, that if you buy one of their windproof umbrellas, you essentially have an umbrella for life (provided you don't lose it).  If the wind wrecks the frame or fabric, you bring it in, and they will replace it on the spot, no questions asked.  Similarly, one of their flameless candles suffered an unfortunate close encounter with my cleaning lady, and I contacted them, asking if I could buy a replacement.  They sent me one free of charge, no problem.  I'm sure they will do right by this customer if she persists.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T02:08:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001580</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001580" />
    <title>Comment from chocotanya on 2009-11-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>chocotanya</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>OP here. I emailed again November 20th, November 23 at 9:00 am, and November 23 again twelve hours later.  I still have had no response whatsoever since the November 8th email promising the refund within 7-10 days of when my item was received. According to my reckoning, today marks the end of that period, as the item was received November 10th. So, I'm taking Chris' advice, and I've filed a chargeback!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T02:07:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206-comment:20001570</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:consumerist.com,2009://1.10000206" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/meet-the-imaginary-refund-policy-from-hammacher-schlemmer.html#c20001570" />
    <title>Comment from Eldritch on 2009-11-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Eldritch</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The product itself sounds like a scam. No wonder they're giving her the run-around on the return. Chargeback!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-25T01:41:44Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



