<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T10:27:41Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Help, My House Has A Nonexistent Warranty!</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5405116" title="Help, My House Has A Nonexistent Warranty!" />
    <published>2009-11-15T23:00:04Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-16T16:08:40Z</updated>
    <title>Help, My House Has A Nonexistent Warranty!</title>
    <summary>--&gt;Adam and his wife have a question for the Consumerist hive mind. He says that the purchase of his house one year ago included a home warranty. Or, well, it was supposed to. When something went wrong, they tried to file a claim and learned that the agent who listed the house never mailed in the warranty paperwork.  </summary>
    <author>
      <name>Laura Northrup</name>
      <uri>http://www.lauriebird.com/blog</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/consumerist/2009/11/88732596_84dc9fa5a9_m.jpg" width="158" height="105" alt="Hamster is snug in his warranty-less house" />-->Adam and his wife have a question for the Consumerist <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hivemind" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #hivemind" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/hivemind/">hive mind</a>. He says that the purchase of his house one year ago included a home warranty. Or, well, it was supposed to. When something went wrong, they tried to file a claim and learned that the agent who listed the house never mailed in the warranty paperwork.  </p>
<blockquote><p>My wife and I closed on our house Nov 7, 2008 and included in the purchase was a 1 year home warranty to be paid outside closing by the listing agent and it is reflected on the Settlement Statement.  On Nov 6, 2009 the heat pump at our house stopped working and we brought in a company to look at it, they said the fan motor was dead and the system needed to be replace.  They quoted us 6100 for the new system then we placed the order.</p>
<p>We realized that we had a warranty and could probably file a claim to recoup a portion of the new system.  We looked for the warranty info and could not find it so we started calling our real estate agent to see if he had the info.  It turns out the listing agent never bought the warranty.  She says the check was written and either she or the office admin was supposed send the paperwork to the warranty company, but for some reason the check was never cashed and we never had the warranty that was included with the house.</p>
<p>So my problem is I know I have grounds for a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #breachofcontract" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #breachofcontract" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/breachofcontract/">breach of contract</a> lawsuit, and I believe I should be entitled to the full amount of the new system as well as reimbursement for the days I had to take off from work during the week to meet with companies about estimates and also for the actual installation.</p>
<p>So what should I do, I have written an email that has not yet been sent to the listing agent and the Vice President of the branch she works for, but is it in my best interest to try to settle this myself or should a lawyer be involved?</p>
<p>Who knows how many people this has been done to in the past, but then again who is to say that it ever happened before and I am the exception to the rule.  Should I file notice with the Better Business Bureau, the Maryland State Board of Realtors, etc... </p>
<p>I am not asking for free legal advice, I am really trying to find out if other people have had problems with this and what they did to solve them because so far the wonderful world of the internet has not provided me any answers from consumers on this type of topic.</p></blockquote>
<p>Have you had a similar experience? Do you have any advice on how to proceed in this situation?</p>
<p>(Photo: <a rel="cc:attributionURL" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/annia316/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/annia316/</a> / <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">CC BY 2.0</a>)</p>
]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16917729</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16917729" />
    <title>Comment from xskeptictankx on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>xskeptictankx</name>
        <uri>http://skeptictank.tumblr.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://skeptictank.tumblr.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I would normally say that the letter with your requested course of action should suffice, but since there's really nothing they can do in order to make the situation right again, you may want to skip straight to a lawyer and find out what can be done, which I believe is bringing up a lawsuit.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:53:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16904152</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16904152" />
    <title>Comment from CSchnack on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>CSchnack</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>You could end up having more legal leverage without the warranty. Most home warranty policies exclude coverage for nearly everything, plus contain an arbitration clause that takes away your right to sue over denied claims. Disputes over claim denials are instead taken to arbitration, with an arbitration firm the warranty co no doubt has an ongoing relationship with...an obvious potential for bias. There is more about home warranties and arbitration on hadd.com a consumer advocacy site, and also Public Citizen has done two reports now on arbitration abuses in housing/warranties. The latest one was called Home Court Advantage and is on fairarbitrationnow.org as well as citizen.org. At least with there being no warranty in place, you might have some legal recourse against the folks that told you a "warranty" was included. Good luck.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:53:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16897952</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16897952" />
    <title>Comment from webweazel on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>webweazel</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I was looking into new heat pump systems recently while helping out a friend comparison shop. PLEASE do some research on the net first for systems. You'll spend MUCH MUCH less than that. Most places will have it delivered right to your door by truck, then you just have to hire a guy to install it.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:53:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16889986</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16889986" />
    <title>Comment from feckingmorons on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>feckingmorons</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16848285" rel="nofollow">ZoeSchizzel</a>: So hiring a lawyer to represent you is somehow dishonest or unethical?</p>
<p>He called the real estate agent (Realtor is a trade name and thus there is also a copyright on using the term.   Also a Board of Realtors is a trade group, not a governmental body.  Maryland has a Real Estate Commission, that licenses and disciplines real estate agents and brokers.)</p>
<p>Maryland also has a guaranty fund that upon which a party to a real estate transaction may make a claim if their was some irregularity in the transcation with a licensee.</p>
<p>It is lawyers who know these kinds of things, but if you want to complain to a trade group representing real estate agents, be my guest.  Although bear in mind they are on the agent's side as the agents fund them.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:53:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16889666</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16889666" />
    <title>Comment from feckingmorons on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>feckingmorons</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16836471" rel="nofollow">H3ion</a>: "This isn't some evil person trying to screw customers as much as a paper screwup which happens."</p>
<p>Nonsense, it was fraud.  She collected a commission and she was to have paid for the warranty out of the commisssion.</p>
<p>Not only is this a civil matter, it is most certainly a criminal matter.</p>
<p>Paperwork error my arse.   Let the licensing authority investigate her for a pattern of this.  The real estate agent needs to go to prison.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:53:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16889589</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16889589" />
    <title>Comment from feckingmorons on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>feckingmorons</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Six grand, just sue her.  I would also file a complaint with the real estate agent licensing board in your state.  They may also have information about her surety bond against which you might make a claim.</p>
<p>If you had a real estate lawywer, use that person to help with this.  If you did not, you should have.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:53:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16865894</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16865894" />
    <title>Comment from Julia789 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Julia789</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16865636" rel="nofollow">AD8BC</a>: Well thank you! ;-)</p>
<p>I also have a very common last name. There have been plenty of infamous bad things done in my family name. I'm sure there are a lot of Cahill insurance agents out there who are unassociated with the one that scammed us.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16865636</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16865636" />
    <title>Comment from AD8BC on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>AD8BC</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16859323" rel="nofollow">Julia789</a>: As a Cahill, I apologize for the actions of the other Cahill, even though I don't know who he is.  But I feel bad.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16864269</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16864269" />
    <title>Comment from FlyersFan on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>FlyersFan</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>First of all if it was paid outside of closing it wouldnt be on the settlement sheet. In PA and NJ if the seller is providing the warranty the listing agent calls the warranty company to put coverage on the house and a confirmation number is given. No money is ever handed over to the warranty company before settlement, it always gets paid at settlement.</p>
<p>The buyer probably was handed paperwork with the warranty info, a confirmation number and a number to call to activate the buyer's side of the home coverage. My guess is the buyer just threw the paperwork in with all the other paperwork and did not bother to call to activate the warranty. Its not the agents job to activate your warranty, its your responsibility!!!</p>
<p>Of course if you didnt receive any paperwork at settlement then you have a good reason to be pissed but waiting a year to do anything about making sure you have it was dumb on your part.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16861066</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16861066" />
    <title>Comment from lacubsfan on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>lacubsfan</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Lawyer up.... get the lawyer with the "jew"iest last name :)</p><br />
<p>**No that is not racist... I'm Jewish*</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16859323</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16859323" />
    <title>Comment from Julia789 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Julia789</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5405116/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty#c16850673" rel="nofollow">qwerty001984</a>: Cahill was the name, he *was* an agent for Ohio Casualty. In fairness to Ohio Casualty Insurance, the guy scammed them just as bad as he scammed us. I don't think he'll ever represent them again. I think he is self employed as some kind of independent insurance broker now.</p><br />
<p>I sincerely hope the guy at least feels like shit over what he did. He literally gave my father a heart attack when this happened, the stress of losing all that money, paying all those legal fees, and years of court appearances almost killed him. My father died last year of diabetic complications, but I swear the years of stress over all this took years off his life.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16854447</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16854447" />
    <title>Comment from Shadowman615 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shadowman615</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16851542" rel="nofollow">mariospants</a>: From the article it seems to me the warranty was (supposed to be) purchased by the seller as a contingency for buying the house.  In that case it would have specifically been included in the contract.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16853785</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16853785" />
    <title>Comment from GearheadGeek on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>GearheadGeek</name>
        <uri>http://ghgsatx.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ghgsatx.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16852492" rel="nofollow">RalphyNader</a>: I think that in most cases, the home warranty is paid by the seller either as an enticement to the buyer, or on demand of the buyer in the offer.  Both times I've sold a house I've paid the warranty... the first was from a request in the offer, the second was offered as a "feature" in the listing.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16853644</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16853644" />
    <title>Comment from greggen on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>greggen</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16844749" rel="nofollow">soundreasoning</a>: sure the realtor might not have commited fraud, but the OP was defrauded by the actions.<br />
By all means, file a big boy lawsuit and put all the realtor's past actions under the mocroscope and see if this 'honest mistake' ever happened again.  Infact, check everyone at the realtor's company, to see if their company is mistake-prone...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16852492</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16852492" />
    <title>Comment from RalphyNader on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>RalphyNader</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Why was this not included in closing? And why was the listing agent, not your buying agent, the one in charge of sending in premium for your warranty?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16851542</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16851542" />
    <title>Comment from mariospants on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>mariospants</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5405116/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty#c16837922" rel="nofollow">ninabi</a>: I think the main problem is that they don't <i>have</i> a contract or warranty. Just a receipt for same.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16851097</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16851097" />
    <title>Comment from econobiker on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>econobiker</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5405116/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty#c16835968" rel="nofollow">lpranal</a>: I was thinking too that if the people start rattling their swords about Realtor association, ethics, state boards, etc with specific details of what they will be doing if the broker/realtor doesn't correct the issue, they might suddenly get some movement.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16851012</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16851012" />
    <title>Comment from econobiker on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>econobiker</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5405116/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty#c16844749" rel="nofollow">soundreasoning</a>: Certain people (sometimes in sales) seem to always have "mistakes" when he or she can get away with getting something for his/herself or not doing something for a client. Sure~~~~~~ it is never "fraud" because there is always a "mistake" to cover it.</p><br />
<p>I know because I was once married to a person who did just these types of actions with those type of excuses... And her apple didn't fall far from the tree as revealed after the divorce by several "mistake" made by her father in relation to transfer of some finances...</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16850821</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16850821" />
    <title>Comment from econobiker on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>econobiker</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5405116/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty#c16835392" rel="nofollow">laserjobs</a>: And don't forget the copyright/trademark symbol with Realtor®</p><br />
<p><a href="http://www.realtor.org/LetterLw.nsf/pages/TrademarkLogoRules" rel="nofollow">[www.realtor.org]</a></p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16850673</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16850673" />
    <title>Comment from qwerty001984 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>qwerty001984</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16836569" rel="nofollow">Julia789</a>:<br />Please tell the use name and company for this insurance agent.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16850046</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16850046" />
    <title>Comment from ittybittykitty on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>ittybittykitty</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16848285" rel="nofollow">ZoeSchizzel</a>: This is very reasonable. I wonder if the op has even asked them what they are willing to do to help him out. What the listing agent should do is pay for "another" year of home warranty service to make up for the year that was not covered. But either way, if the op really had the warranty coverage he probably would have been out of luck. The home warranties have very specific rules. You have to contact them BEFORE you have anyone come out to look at your problem. Then they give you a list of contractors they work with. You have to pay a copay just to have them look at your problem. If you want one of your own contractors, you have to send the warranty company the estimate. Then you run the chance of your problem not even being covered. That is the reason we didn't renew our home warranty after our free year ran out when we purchased our home a few years ago. It was better just to save the money in case we needed to fix something in our house. We had a guy come look at the ac and had to pay $75 just for him to say that our coils were dirty and that was not covered. We could've just had any ac company come look at it and give us a FREE estimate. Also the warranty company would have never reimbursed us for the time we took off work to meet with the contractors. That is just not heard of!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16849953</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16849953" />
    <title>Comment from LucindaJobnick on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>LucindaJobnick</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16836771" rel="nofollow">Allen</a>: You should ask for fees, and your lawyer will recommend it. But courts almost never actually award them. Just something to keep in mind - keep your legal fees within reason because you'll almost certainly pay them yourself, even if you win compensation for the warranty or fan motor or both.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16849917</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16849917" />
    <title>Comment from LucindaJobnick on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>LucindaJobnick</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16836471" rel="nofollow">H3ion</a>: Sadly, I think the odds of getting a fair shake from any board of Realtors is slim to none. They exist to defend Realtors. They're not interested in hearing the merits of the case, as legitimate as they may be. They don't care about the merits.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16849828</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16849828" />
    <title>Comment from LucindaJobnick on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>LucindaJobnick</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16843037" rel="nofollow">Cant_stop_the_rock</a>: Probably correct. There's no way of knowing what the warranty company would have actually paid for at the end of the day, so showing damages would be a little difficult. Not impossible, but difficult. Nevertheless, the OP was screwed and is right to be hacked off over it. Based on my experience with Realtors and brokers, they're usually snakes and they'll refuse to compensate you one penny.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16849667</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16849667" />
    <title>Comment from LucindaJobnick on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>LucindaJobnick</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16842730" rel="nofollow">Derp</a>: Fail. The responsibility is the seller's to do what they agreed to do. The OP's oversight has NO bearing AT ALL on the merits of his case.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16849590</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16849590" />
    <title>Comment from LucindaJobnick on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>LucindaJobnick</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835461" rel="nofollow">Deranged_Kitsune</a>: Boards of Realtors exist for one reason: To defend Realtors. Sadly.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16849369</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16849369" />
    <title>Comment from Loias on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Loias</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I would suggest starting with contacting them, and if they are uncooperative, then speak to a lawyer. Sometimes just the threat of a lawyer is enough to get people moving. The heat pump is probably a "need" expense so you should install it now.</p><br />
<p>But regardless you have a lot of ground to stand on here and sounds like a good lawsuit on your hands. Get 'er dun!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16849310</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16849310" />
    <title>Comment from Loias on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Loias</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16835291" rel="nofollow">zigziggityzoo</a>: did I see a quote of $6,100? That is not eligible for small claims court in most, of not all states.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16848774</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16848774" />
    <title>Comment from james on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>james</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>The realtor firm ius sure to have errors and omissions insurance.  You need to make it clear to them that they will be paying you to make you completely whole, starting with a brand-spanking new heat-pump right now, and then the policy you were told was yours at closing.</p>
<p>Don't bother with small claims, write them a letter today saying that they will pay the claim out of pocket, and file their own claim with their errors and omissions insurance, or they will also be paying the legal fees you run up to extract the money from their pockets in district court (real court, not small claims court).</p>
<p>Yes, fraud can be shouted here, as one could always claim that their excuses are self-serving BS, but<br />
such claims are best thrown around by an actual lawyer.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16848740</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16848740" />
    <title>Comment from cmdrsass on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>cmdrsass</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835910" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: probably</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16848285</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16848285" />
    <title>Comment from ZoeSchizzel on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>ZoeSchizzel</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I love how the lawyers say "Hire a lawyer."</p><br />
<p>The truth is MOST business professionals (and that includes most realtors) are decent people. They do make mistakes, but generally, they try to make up for those mistakes when they happen especially if they are approached by clients with a reasonable request for compensation and are given the opportunity to make it right. Why involve lawyers, the courts, and make nasty demands before you've even given the realtor and her company the chance to fix it? Just because a mistake was made, doesn't mean it's fraud. Mistakes happen and there's no reason to get all cranked up about it, especially since the warranty period would have been over by now and so you will not be out any additional "under warranty" expenses.</p><br />
<p>I'd make an appointment with the realtor and the head of the agency and work it out. Don't get douchy and ask for things you wouldn't have gotten if there had been an actual warranty. Your initial goal with the warranty was to "recoup a PORTION of the new system." Figure out what portion the warranty would have covered, and ask the agency to cover that amount.</p><br />
<p>If they circle the wagons, then you can file in small claims court, and make a complaint with their board of realtors. There won't be any need to hire a lawyer, particularly since the amount (the amount of the repair that would have been paid out under the warranty) you're likely to recover will be small.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16848115</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16848115" />
    <title>Comment from loueloui on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>loueloui</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16835291" rel="nofollow">zigziggityzoo</a>:</p><br />
<p>Agreed. This situation is tailor made for a lawsuit. Either brach of contract, or breach of fiduciary duty in my decidedly unprofessional opinion.</p><br />
<p>I read about something like this once where someone bought insurance on their house, and the insurance agent 'forgot' to send in their premiums to the insurance company.</p><br />
<p>When they tried to file a claim, the agent suggested they get in touch with the Mennonites to help them rebuild their home!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16847753</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16847753" />
    <title>Comment from nbs2 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>nbs2</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5405116/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty#c16835914" rel="nofollow">samurailynn</a>: Likely not. With our warranty, when we had an issue it was assigned to one particular company. They made an appointment, came in, and took care of it. There was no negotiating, etc. Any replacement would have been for the equivalent or similar.</p><br />
<p>Here, they were responsible for investigating and determining who would do the work and negotiating what served their budget and interests. None of that would have happened had the agent been on the ball.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16847315</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16847315" />
    <title>Comment from friendlynerd on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>friendlynerd</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835718" rel="nofollow">jaya9581</a>: what does that even mean, "follow up?"  As in "make sure you actually have a home warranty that was to be included in the purchase price of the house?"</p>
<p>Please stop being ridiculous.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16847180</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16847180" />
    <title>Comment from dkmurphys88 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>dkmurphys88</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>i do a lot of work for a homewarranty company. i perform plumbing and hvac work. if you do seek a law suit one thing to remember. the home warranty will install a like product as to what you have. meaning if you have 80% or less furnace you will get a 80% furnace if you have 90% you will get 90. you also have costs out of your pocket even with a warranty . plus the warranty company would usually only change the blower motor not the furnace. and that price of 6100 is extreamly high unless your installing a 96% furnace</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16847079</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16847079" />
    <title>Comment from xspook on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>xspook</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5405116/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty#c16835402" rel="nofollow">headhot</a>:</p><br />
<p>You might want to check your IQ before posting such a poorly written response.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16845954</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16845954" />
    <title>Comment from allstarecho on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>allstarecho</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Try and settle it with the realty company. Ask them to cover the costs of replacing the heat pump. If they won't, take 'em to court for the costs of replacing the heat pump, costs of missed wages from work and costs to purchase a new warranty.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16845272</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16845272" />
    <title>Comment from sonneillon on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>sonneillon</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835291" rel="nofollow">zigziggityzoo</a>: To be fair some states regulate warranties and insurance and the those regulators may just hit the realtors bond, I have heard of it happening with insurance agents and insurance companies "forgetting" to file a persons insurance, but warrenty regulation varies wildly state to state, he may have to sue in big peoples court.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16845043</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16845043" />
    <title>Comment from evilpete on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>evilpete</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Get a lawyer, since they will have one.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16844956</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16844956" />
    <title>Comment from henneko on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>henneko</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16842730" rel="nofollow">Derp</a>: Like the agent's responsibility for filing the policy paperwork?  Oh wait...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16844749</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16844749" />
    <title>Comment from soundreasoning on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>soundreasoning</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16837680" rel="nofollow">Cant_stop_the_rock</a>: People on this site believe every wrong is fraud.  Its hard to get them to believe otherwise.  Good luck.  And to clarify the above, even if they paid for it, and even if the realtor (broker) cashed the check, you still need to prove they intended to take the money and give nothing in exchange, otherwise its a mistake, the mistake could be (and probably is) a breach, but not necessarily a fraud.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16843840</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16843840" />
    <title>Comment from christoj879 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>christoj879</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>A warranty was included with the purchase of our home.  I decided to check reviews of the company (AHS) and saw a long line of similar complaints:</p>
<p>1) The contractor is concerned first with getting their $50-75 before they even walk in the door.<br />
2) The contractor words the problem to AHS in such a way that they will immediately deny the claim, in order for them to<br />
3) Tell the homeowner it was declined but they'll do it for them for $xxx cash price.</p>
<p>The reason for this is that AHS pays way below market rates, so in addition to attracting the lowest-grade contractors the contractors themselves have found out how to screw over the homeowner.</p>
<p>To their credit, it was easy to get them to send me a refund check.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16843037</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16843037" />
    <title>Comment from Cant_stop_the_rock on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cant_stop_the_rock</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16841597" rel="nofollow">apd09</a>:</p>
<p>The warranty company would have paid to replace the fan motor, not the whole system.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16842730</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16842730" />
    <title>Comment from Derp on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Derp</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16839315" rel="nofollow">JPropaganda</a>:</p><br />
<p>Because personal responsibility is someone elses responsibility?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16842476</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16842476" />
    <title>Comment from Sudonum on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sudonum</name>
        <uri>http://n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16841597" rel="nofollow">apd09</a>: <br />
Lets talk about heat pumps, like a standard A/C system they have 2 main components, the evaporator and the condenser. One is in you attic (or maybe hall closet or something) the other one is in your yard right next to you house.</p>
<p>In the post you stated:<br />
"they said the fan motor was dead and the system needed to be replace"<br />
Each of those components has a fan motor, your post didn't specify which fan motor was bad. Based on your comment in this thread ("you cannot just buy a new outdoor fan") I assume that you were referring to the fan in your condensing unit. In fact you can buy a fan for this unit, depending on availability of course, <br />
However, also based on your comments in this thread, you weren't considering replacing the just the fan, you decided to replace entire condensing unit (I won't go into how you can replace just the condensing unit, as long as the SEER rating is the same as the evaporator) that was not clear in your original post.</p>
<p>My point is that if you want people to stick to commenting on what is written, you need to do a better job of writing it. I'm sure many posters assumed that you were referring to simply replacing a fan motor, and not replacing your condensing unit.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_pump" rel="nofollow">[en.wikipedia.org]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16842352</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16842352" />
    <title>Comment from FunnyAboutMoney on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>FunnyAboutMoney</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Do you have any evidence in your paperwork from the purchase of the house showing that you were supposed to get a warranty, and when exactly its start date was? A J.P. or a judge will want to see a contract describing the promised warranty.</p>
<p>The company mails you a package with a contract, a brochure explaining how to make a claim, and some glossy advertising. If you didn't get anything from the warranty company, possibly you should have inquired early on?</p>
<p>In my experience, warranty companies do everything they can to avoid replacing expensive equipment, and when they're forced to replace something, they provide low-end products, even when the original was top-of-the-line. Normally they will repair it and try to keep it running until your warranty expires. If the fan  motor went out and no other damage occurred, the warranty would cover repair of the fan motor -- by the warranty company's selected contractor, not by the homeowner's choice of craftsmen. It wouldn't cover the cost of replacing a heat pump that could be fixed.</p>
<p>It sounds like you're probably entitled to have the Realtor buy you a year's warranty, starting forthwith, if you can prove that a warranty was sold to you when you bought the house. And that's about it.</p>
<p>Sixty-one hundred dollars seems a little high for a replacement heat pump, BTW, unless your house is pretty large. I paid a little over $3,000 for a mid-range unit about a year ago.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16841597</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16841597" />
    <title>Comment from apd09 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>apd09</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16838630" rel="nofollow">Verucalise(countingcalories)</a>: I am the OP, and you are a bit out of touch with heat pump systems.  The thing was 10+ years old and even if I replaced the fan motor for 1500 or so it most likely was going to die soon because it was pulling about 13 amps and should have only been running at 8 or so.<br />
With the new energy star systems you cannot just buy a new outdoor fan you have to replace the entire system, that is outdoor equipment and indoor equipment.</p>
<p>If you do not have the entire story then stick to commenting on what is written.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16841315</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16841315" />
    <title>Comment from frodolives35 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>frodolives35</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16835291" rel="nofollow">zigziggityzoo</a>: I love that link. Tn 25000 with no lawyer woohoo judge Judy here I come.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16840603</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16840603" />
    <title>Comment from stein5830 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>stein5830</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Most businesses, reputable ones will carry E&amp;O insurance. This is errors and omissions insurance. When I was working as a public insurance adjuster I came a a similar situation except that the home was nearly destroyed by a hurricane and the agent never sent the correct papers in and the home had no insurance. After talking to the agent they referred us to their business line insurance writer for their E&amp;O policy and the homeowner was given enough to repair the home and bring it up to date with its insurance policy. So long as the business is a legit and above board they should have a policy with a minimum annual maximum of $1 Million, which should cover just about all your damages. If the reps who answer the phone play hardball the only other option may be to get an attorney involved to that their attorney will be able to get the proper documents, or offer a settlement.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16840598</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16840598" />
    <title>Comment from stein5830 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>stein5830</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16836077" rel="nofollow">Jocko_OC</a>: <br />
Most businesses, reputable ones will carry E&amp;O insurance. This is errors and omissions insurance. When I was working as a public insurance adjuster I came a a similar situation except that the home was nearly destroyed by a hurricane and the agent never sent the correct papers in and the home had no insurance. After talking to the agent they referred us to their business line insurance writer for their E&amp;O policy and the homeowner was given enough to repair the home and bring it up to date with its insurance policy. So long as the business is a legit and above board they should have a policy with a minimum annual maximum of $1 Million, which should cover just about all your damages. If the reps who answer the phone play hardball the only other option may be to get an attorney involved to that their attorney will be able to get the proper documents, or offer a settlement.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16840498</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16840498" />
    <title>Comment from Bob Lu on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bob Lu</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16840488" rel="nofollow">Bob Lu</a>: *warranty*. Sorry can't spell today.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16840488</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16840488" />
    <title>Comment from Bob Lu on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bob Lu</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16836431" rel="nofollow">trixrabbit</a>: but the 6100 is for replacing the whole system. although I really don't understand why a dead motor will justify replacing the whole system. Either OP was con'd by the mechanic or OP was trying to take advantage of his (nonexistent) house warranty. However, as many reader pointed out, the house warrenty doesn't work this way. so even if he had the warrenty, he is unlikely to get money for it.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16839650</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16839650" />
    <title>Comment from tsukiotoshi on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>tsukiotoshi</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16836316" rel="nofollow">H3ion</a>: How is it effectively the small claims court? The District Court website says specifically it has to be under $5,000 to qualify for small claims.  The District Court does, however, have concurrent jurisdiction with the circuit courts for claims under $30,000.  If you are asking for that much money you should probably have an attorney, which is one of the major differences between small claims and otherwise.</p>
<p>In any case to the original OP, I would probably recommend you consult an attorney about your options in this kind of situation. Real estate or contract attorneys will have a pretty good handle on the law in Maryland for these kind of contracts. In the interest of full disclosure, however, I will point out I'm a law student so I am perhaps biased on this.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16839315</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16839315" />
    <title>Comment from JPropaganda on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>JPropaganda</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonpickar.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jasonpickar.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835578" rel="nofollow">savdavid</a>: Ahhh the classic "blame the OP"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16839226</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16839226" />
    <title>Comment from catastrophegirl on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>catastrophegirl</name>
        <uri>http://www.catastrophegirl.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.catastrophegirl.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835402" rel="nofollow">headhot</a>: i am friends with a couple of realtors and they often say the same thing about many of the people they have to work with.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16838972</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16838972" />
    <title>Comment from rpm773 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>rpm773</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16838160" rel="nofollow">soundreasoning</a>: FYI,I'm not the OP (it may not have been clear).</p>
<p>And I'm inclined to agree with what you wrote..that the heat pump, the $6100, and the lost work time are outside of the scope of the OP's claim against his realtor.</p>
<p>What I said is that, through my experiences, I don't see a lot of value in home warranties.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16838928</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16838928" />
    <title>Comment from Lukecadet on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lukecadet</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835402" rel="nofollow">headhot</a>: <br />
I think this statement sums things up nicely.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16838630</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16838630" />
    <title>Comment from Verucalise(countingcalories) on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Verucalise(countingcalories)</name>
        <uri>http://www.myspace.com/verucalise</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.myspace.com/verucalise">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5405116/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty#c16836431" rel="nofollow">trixrabbit</a>: Must be some fan motor... I was thinking the same thing myself.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16838192</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16838192" />
    <title>Comment from SlyBevel on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>SlyBevel</name>
        <uri>http://www.askemb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.askemb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>You're not missing much.</p>
<p>We just bought a home in August, and three times already, we've tried to make use of the home warranty that got wrapped into the deal.</p>
<p>Our agent (who is a person we've used before, and we trust) said that it's one of the better warranties out there, and she even ponied up ~$50 extra for the next-better one available from the same folks.</p>
<p>As I said, we've tried to make use of the thing three different times since we bought the house, and each time, the home warranty people have managed to label our issue as non-covered. Fat lot of good they are.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16838160</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16838160" />
    <title>Comment from soundreasoning on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>soundreasoning</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835946" rel="nofollow">rpm773</a>: I'll say the above description is important and I agree that trying to negotiate with company that said they would obtain and pay for a warranty first before involving a lawyer is the way to go.</p>
<p>What I'll also say is that while the warranty that might have existed would likely have included the kind of provisions stated above, the truth is you did not in fact receive a warranty at all.  As such you had no notice regarding the proper procedure for making a repair under the warranty.  As such any argument that you would have to follow the above procedure is moot, as there was no procedure that you knew of to be followed, and in fact no procedure in actuality to be followed because no warranty policy was in existence.  As far as you know you could have obtained a warranty that would not have the above procedures included in its terms.  So making you follow the terms of a speculative warranty is not proper.  Good luck.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16837932</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16837932" />
    <title>Comment from Diningbadger on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Diningbadger</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The real estate agency or the closing agent have a fiduciary responsibility to see to it that the money was deposited, cashed and a receipt given to the property owner. The responsibility is upon them if they took the responsibility in the first place.</p>
<p>You should go after the real estate agency's and agent's license and go before the board of local realtor's with your claim to seek restitution.</p>
<p>You need to give the "body" of realtor's the importunity to function before going crazy over this.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16837922</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16837922" />
    <title>Comment from ninabi on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>ninabi</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835291" rel="nofollow">zigziggityzoo</a>:</p>
<p>They need to read their contract.  We ran into the same problem (defunct roof warranty came with the house, roof leaked, roofer out of business several years prior to our purchase) and our lawyer said it had to go to arbitration due to our contract.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16837853</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16837853" />
    <title>Comment from RogerTheAlien on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>RogerTheAlien</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16836705" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: Hahaha. I was hoping, Hoping, HOPING that was some sort of tongue-in-cheek comment on realtors. But, I think I may have been reaching on that one. Ahhh, a boy can dream, though.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16837680</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16837680" />
    <title>Comment from Cant_stop_the_rock on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cant_stop_the_rock</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16837451" rel="nofollow">Awjvail</a>:</p>
<p>It sounds like the OP <i>did</i> pay.  The check that was referred to in the article was one that was written by the listing agent and never sent to the warranty company.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16837661</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16837661" />
    <title>Comment from Cant_stop_the_rock on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cant_stop_the_rock</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16836018" rel="nofollow">wrjohnston91283</a>:</p>
<p>RTFA.  The realtor says it was a mistake, which is believable.  If that is true, it would not be fraud.  For it to be fraud you would have to prove it was intentional, which we cannot do with the information we have.  Thus it is not accurate to say "this actually constitutes fraud."  It would be accurate to say "this <i>could</i> be fraud if you can prove it was intentional."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16837451</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16837451" />
    <title>Comment from Awjvail on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Awjvail</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835684" rel="nofollow">subsider34</a>: They didn't actually pay anything... they wrote a check but apparently the check was never cashed.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16836771</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16836771" />
    <title>Comment from Allen on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Allen</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Do not try to do anything beyond what you have already done on your own without a lawyer.  Any communication, no matter how trivial, can be used if this should end up in court.</p>
<p>Have your attorney first write them a 30 day demand letter to them (both the agent and the agency).  If they do not respond to that, take them to court and seek lawyer fees as part of the remediation; something you cannot request in the small claims courts of most states.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16836751</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16836751" />
    <title>Comment from zacwax on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>zacwax</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>As a lawyer I'd tell you to lawyer up.</p>
<p>You could make an initial demand letter, but I'd still talk to an attorney first.</p>
<p>Things could get ugly, especially if they deny responsibility.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16836705</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16836705" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835392" rel="nofollow">laserjobs</a>: Realtor, okay? I know people sometimes (for whatever reason) pronounce it "real it tor" but that's not it at all.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16836685</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16836685" />
    <title>Comment from Julia789 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Julia789</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835536" rel="nofollow">outoftheblew</a>: And always call the company to make sure what you receive in the mail is not a fake certificate typed up by the agent who pocketed the money. See my post below!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16836569</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16836569" />
    <title>Comment from Julia789 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Julia789</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835377" rel="nofollow">henrygates</a>: Oooooo an insurance agent screwed my family doing this!</p>
<p>My father, years ago, purchased workman's comp insurance for his small business through a reputable firm. The cost was $50K. The insurance agent typed up a fake insurance certificate and a fake letter from the insurance company stating the new policy was in effect. The insurance agent pocketed the $50K for himself, spent it, and hoped no worker would file a workman's comp claim. (Stupid, it was a line of work with a history of injuries due to physical nature of the business, welding, installations, etc.)</p>
<p>Well don't you know, a few months later a worker was injured. He tried to file workman's comp insurance claim and surprise - no policy existed. The injured worker sued my father. My father sued the insurance company whose agent deceived him and stole his money. The agent moved all his assets to his wife's name and had his uncle, a well liked state politician, pull strings so he could keep his insurance license.</p>
<p>Our family lost thousands upon thousands in legal fees in a case that went on appeals for several years, and paying medical bills for the injured employee, in a case that went all the way to the State supreme court. The supreme court sided partially with the insurance company, stating they only had to reimburse my father for the $50K their agent stole, but that they were not liable to cover the workman's comp claim of the injured employee.</p>
<p>That insurance agent is still selling insurance to this day. It's amazing what political connections will do. The agent claimed he cashed the check and spent the money "by accident" and "forgot to file the paperwork to start the policy." Funny how he didn't "forget" to fake the certificate and letter prior to spending the $50K.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16836471</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16836471" />
    <title>Comment from H3ion on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>H3ion</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I would first contact the realtor and make a claim and tell them that you will be filing a complaint with the State Board of Realtors if you don't get some relief.  I think that most realtors are concerned enough about their reputation to probably do something.</p>
<p>If you don't get any satisfaction directly from the realtor, by all means file the complaint but don't expect anything to happen.  This isn't some evil person trying to screw customers as much as a paper screwup which happens.  Unfortunately, there's no check on this as there would be on something that was important to the lender or which gets recorded.</p>
<p>I think Pandare is right.  This is something where you are better served by using a lawyer than trying to do it yourself.  You could sue the realtor for breach of contract, certainly, or for the tort of negligence which allows for punitive damages (which are unlikely here).</p>
<p>As to damages, you might recover what you would have recovered for your heater.  Recovery for your time lost is pretty unlikely.  Also, check the timing.  If the warranty would have been a one year warranty and the heater failed after one year from when the warranty would have been bought if everything went the way it was supposed to, you may be out of luck anyway.</p>
<p>I am a lawyer who doesn't do this kind of work and please don't consider this legal advice, but it would really make sense to contact a flesh and blood lawyer.  (Yes, Trai Dep, lawyers have flesh and blood.)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16836431</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16836431" />
    <title>Comment from trixrabbit on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>trixrabbit</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>wait, wait, wait. fan motor dead? $6100. i will come over and replace it for you for free. ok, ok, you have to buy me a 6-pack of beer. sheesh, the fan assembly, start and/or run capacitors should be under $150.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16836319</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16836319" />
    <title>Comment from Sudonum on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sudonum</name>
        <uri>http://n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16836077" rel="nofollow">Jocko_OC</a>: <br />
That's also great advice. My wife is a broker and she takes shit like this very seriously.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16836316</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16836316" />
    <title>Comment from H3ion on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>H3ion</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835475" rel="nofollow">chgoeditor</a>: Jurisdiction of the Maryland District Court (effectively the small claims court) is $30,000 for either tort or contract.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16836296</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16836296" />
    <title>Comment from Sudonum on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sudonum</name>
        <uri>http://n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835968" rel="nofollow">lpranal</a>: <br />
Go to the state ethics board. Better results, the local board is probably populated with friend and associates of the agent. It's a small fraternity in most towns. <br />
Here's the link to the Maryland Real Estate Commission<br />
<a href="http://www.dllr.state.md.us/license/real_est/recomp.htm" rel="nofollow">[www.dllr.state.md.us]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16836118</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16836118" />
    <title>Comment from Pandare on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Pandare</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'd ask for a consultation with a lawyer type person, if only to make sure that you don't waste your time. The breach claim is good if you paid them already and they failed to pay the warranty company. The recovery for the heater isn't a breach of contract, however, since there was no contract formed. In fact, it's fairly likely that you have to eat the costs of the heater and your time, since you only suffered economic damage (paying more than you wanted for the heater), which is generally not recoverable when someone is merely negligent in failing to send in a warranty form.</p>
<p>But again, I'd talk to a real lawyer type person, if only to know for cheap what you can recover for.</p>
<p>IAALS, and as such, this is not legal advice, but seriously, call a real lawyer and get some.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16836077</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16836077" />
    <title>Comment from Jocko_OC on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jocko_OC</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Also check with the head broker at the Realtor's office where they work,  as most Real Estate Offices require any Realtor working under their name to have Errors and Omissions Insurance which covers any problems with the contract and you probably have a legitimate claim for the Realtors failure to follow through with their part of the deal.  Also threaten the broker with a lawsuit as their name is on the line with the state for any deals they oversee so can can also be held liable.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16836036</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16836036" />
    <title>Comment from coren on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>coren</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835291" rel="nofollow">zigziggityzoo</a>: Unfortunately, the quoted cost won't even fit under the cap for Small Claims in his state.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16836018</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16836018" />
    <title>Comment from wrjohnston91283 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>wrjohnston91283</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835817" rel="nofollow">Cant_stop_the_rock</a>:</p>
<p>When did subsider34 say it was a mistake?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835987</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835987" />
    <title>Comment from rpm773 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>rpm773</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835910" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: I had something to that effect a few minutes ago, but the link to Frank was reeeaaally tenuous.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835968</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835968" />
    <title>Comment from lpranal on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>lpranal</name>
        <uri>http://www.flickr.com/photos/lpranal/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lpranal/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I would definitely contact the ethics board of your local realtor's association, in addition to whatever other action (small claims, etc.)  They're there for this kind of stuff.  Obviously, give the broker a chance to make things right first, but if you sound like you know what you're talking about (maybe mention that you wanted to talk to the broker first before going to the ethics board.)</p>
<p>The broker can get in a lot of trouble for this kind of thing, as it is serious misrepresentation and they can get sued.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835946</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835946" />
    <title>Comment from rpm773 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>rpm773</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835694" rel="nofollow">jan_itor</a>: Our realtor thew a warranty on, and I agree with your description of the warranty after deciding not to renew ours after the 1 year.</p>
<p>Their value is that they're a one-stop shop for all services, but that has its bad aspects.  I decided it was worth more to me to find and build relationships with local tradesman who could address each of my house's systems, as opposed to paying a middleman in bring someone in I didn't know from out of the area (who probably paid the warranty company to be listed as an option).</p>
<p>Plus, our contract I think had a max claim dollar amount per annum of $1500. That's not going to cover much in a house of the age of ours if anything serious were to happen.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835914</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835914" />
    <title>Comment from samurailynn on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>samurailynn</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835556" rel="nofollow">Megalomania</a>: He specifically said time that he had to meet with companies for estimates and installation. That is time he would have had to have taken off even if he did have the warranty.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835910</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835910" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Isn't there <i>any</i> way this can be blamed on Barney Frank?!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835874</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835874" />
    <title>Comment from samurailynn on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>samurailynn</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835377" rel="nofollow">henrygates</a>: There was a home warranty included when we purchased our home (it was advertised on the sign outside the house) but when we went to close, there was nothing about it in the contract paperwork. I asked about this, and the agents and everyone were kind of like "huh.... guess we forgot to put that in". So, I wrote it in and then signed the paperwork. I did get information mailed from the warranty company, so I know they did actually send in the paperwork and pay the premium. We didn't end up using it, but it seems like something that could easily be forgotten often.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835817</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835817" />
    <title>Comment from Cant_stop_the_rock on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cant_stop_the_rock</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835684" rel="nofollow">subsider34</a>:</p>
<p>I believe you don't know what you're talking about.  Mistakes aren't fraud.  If you could prove it was intentional, then it would be fraud.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835749</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835749" />
    <title>Comment from Cant_stop_the_rock on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cant_stop_the_rock</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I doubt you're entitled to money for time off work.  You may only be entitled to the cost of the warranty.  The warranty may not have even paid the claim if you had a warranty; don't they require you to go through them to get repairs done?  And if it was just the fan motor that was broken it sounds like it was repairable but you chose to get a new system (probably because the old system was old an inefficient?).  The warranty company probably would have only paid to replace the motor. Add in the fact that this happened a day short of a year after closing, and I think you'll have a tough time getting everything you want.  At least you should get the cost of the warranty back though.  That'd be about $500.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835718</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835718" />
    <title>Comment from jaya9581 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>jaya9581</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Who doesn't follow up on something as important as a home warranty? If it was important enough to make sure you got it, it should have been important enough to follow up on. Lesson learned for next time, I hope.</p>
<p>Anyway, before you get lawsuit happy, send a letter to the listing agent including a copy of the bill and requesting reimbursement in full, less any deductible your warranty would have had. Explain how you arrived at that figure. Explain that, should they fail to pay within X amount of days, you will file a lawsuit. You may be able to skip small claims and go to a higher court without a lawyer for the full amount they owe, if they do not pay; the clerks at the court house should be able to help you with that info.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835694</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835694" />
    <title>Comment from jan_itor on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>jan_itor</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Even if you had the home warranty, you might be SOL anyway.</p>
<p>I've had a water heater, refrigerator, and dishwasher all replaced, and have also had several miscellaneous issues handled, all by 3 different home warranty companies. In my experience, the process is always the same.</p>
<p>With most home warranty companies, you have to contact them FIRST with your issue. Then they'll send someone from one of their "approved" companies to inspect the issue and do whatever needs to be done. You pay a service fee of $50-150 (depending on your plan), and they handle the rest. BUT, you have to do EVERYTHING through them.</p>
<p>If they determine your existing unit can't be repaired, the home warranty company will chose the make and model of the replacement unit as well, and the warranty usually stipulates that it has to be of comparable quality/features to what you had before. No partial credit towards "upgrades".</p>
<p>Keep in mind, home warranties are not insurance companies, and most of them do not accept claims for reimbursement.</p>
<p>I'm sure you could file suit against them for breach of contract, but you are only "entitled" to what would have been covered under your warranty, and nothing more. Plead that case, and I'm sure any respectable company would be willing to help you out.</p>
<p>But if you get greedy and ask for lost wages (never covered under any home warranty) and full replacement costs on a replacement system that you may not have received from the warranty company, I imagine their response would be "see you in court."</p>
<p>Welcome to home ownership.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835684</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835684" />
    <title>Comment from subsider34 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>subsider34</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I believe this actually constitutes fraud. Especially if you paid extra for the warranty, as that would mean that the realtor kept all the money for themselves.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835578</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835578" />
    <title>Comment from savdavid on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>savdavid</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>You would think a huge investment a YEAR ago would have given you plenty of incentive and time to make sure your purchase included everything.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835556</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835556" />
    <title>Comment from Megalomania on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Megalomania</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835475" rel="nofollow">chgoeditor</a>: The reimbursement for time has nothing to do with what's in the warranty - it's with the breach of contract by the real estate agent.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835543</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835543" />
    <title>Comment from Paladin_11 on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Paladin_11</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The heat pump itself probably has a warrantee apart from any warrantee on the house.  Call the manufacturer of the heat pump and see what they have to say.  And by all means, take the shady real estate agent to court over the home warrantee.  If nothing else this sort of behavior needs to be publicized.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835536</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835536" />
    <title>Comment from outoftheblew on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>outoftheblew</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5405116/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty#c16835377" rel="nofollow">henrygates</a>:</p><br />
<p>That's why you should make sure you've received something from the warranty company soon after closing. I don't say this to chide the OP ... I understand how these things get missed. But it is a cross-check to make sure what you're suggesting doesn't happen.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835512</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835512" />
    <title>Comment from eddieck on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>eddieck</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16835291" rel="nofollow">zigziggityzoo</a>: Agreed. If the agent promised the warranty and 'forgot' to actually obtain a policy, then the agent is responsible for the repairs.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835475</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835475" />
    <title>Comment from chgoeditor on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>chgoeditor</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Try to negotiate with the real estate agent before filing suit. Small claims court isn't an option because the limit in Maryland is $5K. But don't plan on getting reimbursed for your time...warranties cover repair and replacement, not the owner's time. If you make that request--and hold out for it--you'll probably only waste time and money on an issue that you'll ultimately lose.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835461</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835461" />
    <title>Comment from Deranged_Kitsune on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Deranged_Kitsune</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If you can deal with the company directly, that's probably your quickest bet. Seek reimbursement of the warranty costs, and full cost of the repair, and there's a good chance they'll play nice. Minimum they should give back would be warranty costs. Report them to the Maryland State Board of Realtors over their actions regardless of outcome, and file a BBB complaint just for completeness.</p>
<p>They won't give you money, I agree with either small claims of full-on breach of contract suite, leveraging as much money as you can out of them; warranty costs, repair costs, lost wages, anything and everything.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835402</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835402" />
    <title>Comment from headhot on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>headhot</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm totally convinced that all you need a pulse and a total lack of morals to be a real estate agent.  In face a IQ may be in hindrance in that field.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835392</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835392" />
    <title>Comment from laserjobs on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>laserjobs</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Try to negotiate with the realitter and their broker first. If that is unsuccessful then read your paperwork with the realitter and see if you need to go arbitration or if you can file in court. Any broker worth their salt will promptly make it right to keep their reputation. Best of luck.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835377</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835377" />
    <title>Comment from henrygates on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>henrygates</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I wonder how often this happens. Agent offers home warranty, includes it in the closing costs, pockets the premium instead.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116-comment:16835291</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5405116" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/help-my-house-has-a-nonexistent-warranty.html#c16835291" />
    <title>Comment from zigziggityzoo on 2009-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>zigziggityzoo</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Small claims court for the cost of warranty and cost of repairs. Anything else you can fit in the lawsuit (lost wages) while still remaining under the legal limit for a small claims case.</p>
<p>That's what I'd do.</p>
<p>Small claims limits: <a href="http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/article-30031.html" rel="nofollow">[www.nolo.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-18T21:52:31Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



