This question got answered in the previous article about this photo.

I think the only thing that keeps my sanity nowadays is knowing that what the fashion industry defines as "sexy and attractive" is often nowhere near what most men define as "sexy and attractive".

NONE of the things I am attracted to in a woman come from "makeup, facials, cremes, moisturizers, and waxing". Most of my friends are not attracted to those things in women, and I fully plan on only being in relationships where those are not prerequisites applied to me.

Do you really believe that to be so globally true? Like I said, I know it's not among my social circle, and I would really like to believe that the majority of all people are likewise not that shallow.

Deathpanelfemainternmentcampsacornstoletheelectionglennbeckisasleeperagentvaccinegenocide!

I won't believe it either way until I get a high-res photo of the runway model as well, since I already have one of the demi photo. at that point i'd probably just compare freckles on her collar bone, since the runway model blemishes wouldn't be shopped out, and they did not shop those out of the demi photo either.

but it is completely possible and actually probable that the camera person had lights set up in a similar fashion because, well, you gotta light up the model for detail.

It was logistically impossible to gather the cast members every week for a new photo shoot, so they would use stand in actors to pose. I would then use publicity photos provided by Fox at the beginning of the season and place their heads on the stand-ins bodies.

I am sure many other shows do this as well. So this is not new to the industry.

There may be some airbrushing involved, but there is no mash-up of the two images in ANY way, and I have not seen any compelling evidence to the contrary. In order to prove it has been photoshopped, I would like to see even ONE area of the photo that are identical. There are none.

The most one could say is that the position of the two torsos are similar, but when you look more closely the differences in ALL of details of the corset don't match AT ALL, from the position of the seaming to the reflective highlights of the material.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not taking the position that photoshopping doesn't occur regularly in the fashion industry - I just don't think it's the case in this particular instance.

I'm a graduate of the School of the Art Institute of Chicago with a Bachelors degree in Fine Arts and I've been a Graphic Designer for the past 8 years.

Surely it makes sense to compare Photoshopped fake Demi with un-made-up natural Demi. Otherwise you're just showing what makeup can do next to what photoshop can do.

Make-up is no more natural than Photoshop really. I don't understand why people cry over distortion of the female image on beauty magazine covers, and then cover their faces with makeup whenever they go out.

Er... those parts aren't on the magazine cover. The cover is that white rectangle.

I won't be convinced it's not the same body unless they release other photos of the model showing the ring (or lack of) on her hand.

And you should follow your own advice and check out the drape of the fabric on non-overlaid versions.

The overlap is also confusing the lighting issues, and more importantly, the fabric drape. I thought it was the same photo, too, but the fabric drape belies that.

Also, I do believe that whoever that is above me that mentioned the hanging part in the center (sorry, can't see the comment to reference while I type) is on the money.

Who do they think they are foolin,' Demi Moore was never that thin in her twenties much less her forties. That is what was and is so great about her, over the top pretty in a fairly normal package.

Firstly, it's obvious that it's a different photo, even if their torsos are in a similar pose and photographed from a similar angle. The lighting is different as is the lay of the garment's details. The armchair quarterbacking on this from laypeople who have no professional computer graphics experience is ludicrous.

Also, the method of laying one photo semi-opaque over the other as shown in the original article masks the differences, rather than revealing them.

The only thing is similar is the pose.

How did Consumerist get the runway photo? There is no photo credit!!!!!
'W' had to have DM pose the same as Anja. This goes deep.

seriously people, take a chill pill.

So they're saying that the neckline draped in exactly the same way and created nearly identical cleavage on both women? And the lights from both the runway and the photo shoot glinted off the dress in exactly the same way?

Wow. Just wow. If this doesn't make men stop and think about the "hot" women they see in the pages of their lad mags and compare to their girlfriends and wives, I don't know what will. The face, hair and makeup have all been Photoshopped, and the body, well... the body could be anyone's. AND Photoshopped. *shudder*

This is one of the weirdest things ever. Seriously. Photoshopping away a celebrity's bumps, lumps and blemishes is one thing. Putting their head on an entirely different body... this is a new one.

So, yeah, she definitely implied it was her with the "my hips" part of that.

Go ahead, Demi and W . . . tell us that Demi just copied the model's pose in the same dress. I could use a good raucous chortle today. :)

or not....

I don't know why I'm so amused, maybe because I loathe DM as an attention whore who never missed an opportunity to take her clothes off for the camera? And now her bod isn't good enough for W?

I don't know if that'd be considered irony, but it's certainly a very public bitchslap.

I don't know why I'm so amused, maybe because I loathe DM as an attention whore who never missed an opportunity to take her clothes off for the camera? And not her bod isn't good enough for W? I don't know if that'd be considered irony, but it's certainly a very public bitchslap.

Demi Moore runs Bartertown.

The part that I find disturbing is that Demi Moore apparently claimed that to be her own body? Did I misread that?

Or are all ideal women supposed to get implants.

No. At least chicken breast is made of meat. There is no meat in those "ideal women".

It's sick, is what it is. Absolutely sick. How could ANYONE think that was a good idea? Demi Moore is still thin and attractive, and yet that had to cut and past her onto a model? If I was the model, I'd sue them for it.

Hang on, I have to pick my jaw up off the ground.

I knew that her hips were fine... I never bothered looking at the rest of her body. I can't stop laughing. This is epic.