<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T10:33:16Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for EVT America Delivers Slow, Inaccurate Scooter, No Lemon Law Refund</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5394703" title="EVT America Delivers Slow, Inaccurate Scooter, No Lemon Law Refund" />
    <published>2009-11-02T02:00:47Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-02T04:42:16Z</updated>
    <title>EVT America Delivers Slow, Inaccurate Scooter, No Lemon Law Refund</title>
    <summary>--&gt;Brett wants the EVT America electric scooter he was promised. A scooter that was supposed to have a top speed of 40-45 mph, and required a motorcycle license. Unfortunately, while at top speed the speedometer reads 45 mph, he claims that reality differs.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Laura Northrup</name>
      <uri>http://www.lauriebird.com/blog</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[
<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/consumerist/2009/11/DSCF1009.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />-->Brett wants the <a href="http://www.evtausa.com/">EVT America</a> electric scooter he was promised. A scooter that was <em>supposed</em> to have a top speed of 40-45 mph, and required a motorcycle license. Unfortunately, while at top speed the speedometer reads 45 mph, he claims that reality differs.</p>
<p>Brett lives in upstate New York, and sent this letter to NY Attorney General <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #andrewcuomo" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/andrewcuomo/">Andrew Cuomo</a>, copying Consumerist.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Dear Mr. Cuomo:</p>
<p>I am filing a formal complaint against <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #evtamerica" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/evtamerica/">EVT America</a> for failure to respond to a glaring defect in a vehicle I purchased from them. This is despite several attempts on my part to discuss the matter directly with them, a judgment in my favor by the New York State Lemon Law process, and a demand letter from my personal lawyer.</p>
<p>A little over a year ago I purchased an all electric motor scooter from Miami-based EVT America via Oakland-Based dealer Electric Motosport. I purchased this vehicle because:</p>
<p>1. It is all electric which would allow me to save energy and be more "green."</p>
<p>2. It was the only all electric motor scooter at the time that claimed to have a speed of 40-45mph. There are multiple all <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #electricscooters" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/electricscooters/">electric scooters</a> that have a maximum speed of 30mph, at which and below a motorcycle license is not required.</p>
<p>I purchased this scooter (model Z20b) over the internet from Electric Motor Sports and had it delivered to my home in March 2008. I completed the requirements for a motorcycle license in the state of New York and hold a current, valid license.</p>
<p>I discovered after riding the scooter for a couple months that its top speed is actually only 32mph, while at the same time the speedometer reads 45mph. I discovered this by having a car follow me, as well as roadside speed guns which say "your speed is ___."</p>
<p>After multiple attempts to get the dealer and EVT America to rectify this situation, I was told "you cannot send it back, you have already bought it." This prompted a successful petition to the New York State Lemon Law authority in which a hearing was held and judgment in my favor rendered. I have still heard nothing from EVT America, nor received my refund.</p>
<p>I have no further recourse except to spend more of my own money to recapture the $2800 I spent on the vehicle. This will take a lengthy legal process as the company is based in Miami, Florida not in New York State.</p>
<p>Please help.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #attorneysgeneral" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/attorneysgeneral/">attorneys general</a> of New York and Florida claim that they aren't able to help Brett collect on his judgment from EVT America, and have told him that he's on his own, and that it's time to hire a lawyer.</p>
<p>Have you had luck getting a refund from an unresponsive company, and do you have any advice for Brett?</p>
<p><strong>RELATED:</strong><br>
<a href="http://consumerist.com/259538/what-is-lemon-law">What Is "Lemon Law?"</a></p>
]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16526274</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16526274" />
    <title>Comment from ktetch on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>ktetch</name>
        <uri>http://ktetch.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ktetch.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16454539" rel="nofollow">Apeweek</a>: I'm no oil company schill (hell, I helped coordinate the merseyside part of the UK protests in 2000, where the refineries were blockaded over fuel prices)</p>
<p>I have just worked in EV design, both large and small, human-carrying and not (one reason I was a technical inspector on the show BattleBots, because I knew my way around electronic speed controls for electric vehicles - some were 17-20hp, in a 350lb vehicle. Thats a better power/weight ratio than my (20yo) civic.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:35:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16490429</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16490429" />
    <title>Comment from P_Smith on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>P_Smith</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Here are the email addresses on the website if any other purchasers feel mistreated and cheated:</p><br />
<p><a href="http://www.evtausa.com/index.php/about-us" rel="nofollow">[www.evtausa.com]</a></p><br />
<p>On the page is says:<br /><br />
---------------------------------------------------</p><br />
<p>For information contact us at: info@evtamerica.com</p><br />
<p>For purchases contact us at: sales@evtamerica.com</p><br />
<p>For technical questions contact us at: support@evtamerica.com</p><br />
<p>For corporate financial issues contact us at: cfo@evtamerica.com</p><br />
<p>For our office in China contact us at: daisy@evtamerica.com</p><br />
<p>For our office in Brazil contact us at: bboldt@evtamerica.com</p><br />
<p>For our office in Europe contact us at: europe@evtamerica.com</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16483510</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16483510" />
    <title>Comment from Harry Manback on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Harry Manback</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16478109" rel="nofollow">gStein_has joined the star bandwagon</a>: *sigh* A lot of my friends ride motorcycles and most (if not all) have the same issue.  I know this one model has had this discussed repeatedly on the internet so I used it as an example.  Just because I only provided one example doesn't mean that only one exists.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16479310</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16479310" />
    <title>Comment from Seokso on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Seokso</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16448806" rel="nofollow">Englishee Teacher</a>: @<a href="#c16448806" rel="nofollow">Englishee Teacher</a>: <br />
I was just about to say the same thing, especially with the part about driving on the sidewalk.  Drivers in Korea are downright homocidal.  After driving in Korea for a few years, I'm afraid of what kind of driver I have become.  I'll have to retrain when I move back home.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16478109</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16478109" />
    <title>Comment from gStein_*|bringing starpipe back|* on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>gStein_*|bringing starpipe back|*</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/gstein42</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/gstein42">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16466236" rel="nofollow">Harry Manback</a>: "one model" is not the same as "quite a few"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16469054</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16469054" />
    <title>Comment from Laura Northrup on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Laura Northrup</name>
        <uri>http://www.lauriebird.com/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lauriebird.com/blog">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16451486" rel="nofollow">Rachacha</a>: FWIW, the OP lives in the Rochester area. This didn't end up in the article because it wasn't relevant.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16466236</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16466236" />
    <title>Comment from Harry Manback on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Harry Manback</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16446029" rel="nofollow">FooSchnickens - Forklift Dirver Extraordinaire</a>: Quite a few motorcycles come from the factory with an 8-10% speedometer error, with &lt;1% odometer error.  Don't believe me?  Do some searching about the SV650 and let me know what you find (I have confirmed this with my SV using both GPS and radar guns).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16461437</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16461437" />
    <title>Comment from duncanblackthorne on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>duncanblackthorne</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've been a motorcycle rider for over 25 years.</p>
<p>1. Looking at that thing, there's no WAY I'd want to go that fast on it (NOT safe!).<br />
2. Looking at that thing, there's no WAY I'd've paid $2800 for it (it looks like it's worth less than a quarter of that).<br />
3. Even ignoring the above, I would NOT purchase any vehicle, new or otherwise, unless I can SEE it in person BEFORE buying it.</p>
<p>I have sympathy for you on some levels, OP, but on many others I have to say you're the one who screwed up.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16458491</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16458491" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16455101" rel="nofollow">Apeweek</a>: Thanks, too.<br />
Add to that that scooters &amp; mopeds are scraping the far bottom of gas-powered efficiency curves: they get great gas mileage solely because of their ultra light weight, not because their engine designs' emissions or power curves are more intelligently engineered. The only category I can think that would be worse would be gas-powered, drivable lawn motors.<br />
I think that means both your cites portray scooters &amp; mopeds too kindly.</p>
<p>That said, they ARE better than SUVs, say. Simply because they cart around less weight. But not less that EV versions within the same category.</p>
<p>Again, both you guys - AWEsome!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16458067</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16458067" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16453687" rel="nofollow">acvicari</a>: Wow. You're awesome. Thanks!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16456483</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16456483" />
    <title>Comment from econobiker on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>econobiker</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5394703/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund#c16448835" rel="nofollow">frodolives35</a>: We need the cheap Chinese goods because no one can afford expensive 1st world items since corporations sent well paying US jobs somewhere else, like China...</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16455809</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16455809" />
    <title>Comment from LeChiffre on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>LeChiffre</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5394703/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund#c16447687" rel="nofollow">cecilsaxon</a>: I looked at these things on E-bay. I thought that they were actually very nice looking scooters but I also did another search on their quality and reliability and I didn't read anything good, so I decided not to buy one. IMO, if you want to buy a "scooter", but a real scooter in the range of 250cc but it'll cost you more also. It'll have more than enough power to handle a freeway and of course rural roads and small town streets. I think this guy wanted to save bucks.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16455678</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16455678" />
    <title>Comment from LeChiffre on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>LeChiffre</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5394703/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund#c16449831" rel="nofollow">H3ion</a>: Ohhh that's good. Now mail fraud? heh heh heh,,,the bucket is getting deeper.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16455101</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16455101" />
    <title>Comment from Apeweek on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Apeweek</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16453687" rel="nofollow">acvicari</a>:</p>
<p>You're on the right track, but a couple of your numbers need help - transmission loss of 25% is not common - the average efficiency of the grid is in the 90s. from Wikipedia:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_transmission" rel="nofollow">[en.wikipedia.org]</a></p>
<p>"...Transmission and distribution losses in the USA were estimated at 7.2% in 1995"</p>
<p>And the 20-25% efficiency of gas engines is a laboratory bench number. In real traffic, you're lucky to get even 15%. Contrast this with electric motors, which have real-world efficiency numbers in the 90s.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16454825</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16454825" />
    <title>Comment from Apeweek on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Apeweek</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447789" rel="nofollow">DeeJayQueue</a>:</p>
<p>By 'overwhelmingly', you mean 50%. That's how much electricity comes from coal (almost no electricity comes from oil anymore, it's too expensive.)</p>
<p>EVs are greener because they make less overall pollution. Lots less. Electric motors are over 90% efficient.</p>
<p>And fuel transportation happens in large part via wire (grid efficiency is about 95%.) Compare this to the equivalent step for your gas car: thousands of trucks visiting thousands of gas stations.</p>
<p>Plus - tons of electricity is used to refine gasoline today! So whatever pollution goes along with electricity is ALREADY added to your gasoline habit.</p>
<p>Here's a study:<br />
<a href="http://www.electric-cars-are-for-girls.com/electric-powered-cars.html" rel="nofollow">[www.electric-cars-are-for-girls.com]</a><br />
actual study: <a href="http://www.energy.ca.gov/papers/CEC-999-1996-015.PDF" rel="nofollow">[www.energy.ca.gov]</a></p>
<p>"...in a study conducted by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, EVs were significantly cleaner over the course of 100,000 miles than ICE cars. The electricity generation process produces less than 100 pounds of pollutants for EVs compared to 3000 pounds for ICE vehicles."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16454539</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16454539" />
    <title>Comment from Apeweek on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Apeweek</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16452828" rel="nofollow">ktetch</a>:</p>
<p>Easy on the silly oil company talking points.</p>
<p>Nothing is 100% green. However, whatever pollution is caused by battery production (hardly any, by the way) pales in comparison to the pollution caused by mining, refining, and burning petroleum.</p>
<p>And the efficiency of transmitting power via the electric grid is about 95%. This efficiency compares quite favorably to the equivalent step for gasoline - TRUCKING it to thousands of service stations.</p>
<p>There's a good reason electricity for EVs costs just a penny or two per mile. It's efficiency.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16453962</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16453962" />
    <title>Comment from zacox on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>zacox</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>If he bought the scooter using a credit card, he may be able to persuade his card issuer into charging back the amount, even though the purchase was definitely outside the usual 60-day window. The card issuer has the discretion, and the technical limit for a chargeback from issuer to merchant is three years.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16453767</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16453767" />
    <title>Comment from AnthonyC on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>AnthonyC</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16449819" rel="nofollow">Laura Northrup</a>:</p>
<p>Exactly. It should read the correct speed if the rider is 100 or 150 pounds, so it should do so at 200 or 250 pounds as well, even if that speed is lower than it would otherwise be.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16453687</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16453687" />
    <title>Comment from AnthonyC on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>AnthonyC</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447789" rel="nofollow">DeeJayQueue</a>:</p>
<p>As a national average, electricity comes from ~50% coal, ~20% each nuclear and natural gas, and ~10% hydro and other renewables. That means the overall carbon intensity of US electricity is about 60% what it would be for coal (or oil, since they are chemically similar enough in this regard) alone.</p>
<p>And yes, transmission &amp; charging create loss- up to ~25% in some places. However, most power plants are 30-35% efficient at converting chemical energy in fossil fuels to electrical energy, whereas engines in vehicles are generally only 20-25% efficient. So even with the losses, centralized generation is more efficient. In addition, electric vehicles enjoy benefits shared by hybrid vehicles- regenerative braking, reduced noise, roughly uniform efficiency at low and high speeds, and instant startup.</p>
<p>The numbers are harder to find for pollutants other than CO2, but Trai_Dep has the right idea (below) with "Err, I'm unsure of YOUR moped, but mine lacks a $120m scrubber at the end of its exhaust pipe."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16453526</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16453526" />
    <title>Comment from AnthonyC on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>AnthonyC</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16452281" rel="nofollow">bwcbwc</a>:</p>
<p>Yes, squirrels are very energetic creatures. :-)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16453482</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16453482" />
    <title>Comment from AnthonyC on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>AnthonyC</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16452828" rel="nofollow">ktetch</a>:</p>
<p>Sorry, do the math or look up the numbers again. Even an electric vehicle powered entirely from a coal plant just about matches a Prius in terms of carbon emissions per mile, even after accounting for transmission and charging efficiency. 4-5 miles/kWh is typical for a car, not sure what a motorcycle would get. Embodied energy is pretty similar, too, though slightly higher for electric vehicles. Meanwhile, here in America, ~30% of our power comes from emissions-free sources (mainly nuclear and hydro), and another ~20% comes from natural gas (which is less CO2 intensive than coal).</p>
<p>Please, don't spread misinformation. Yes, there are certainly going to be places where inefficient dirty power plants and an ailing, ill-maintained, overstressed electric grid mean electric vehicles will pollute more than high-efficiency gas-powered ones. This is not the norm. It is a rare exception.</p>
<p>Moreover, consider that it is much easier and cheaper to reduce emissions, and pollution of all kinds, from large point sources than from many small mobile sources. Over time our electricity has been getting, and will continue to get, cleaner. A gas-powered vehicle has the same emissions profile its whole life, while an electric one gets better automatically as the grid gets cleaner.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16453479</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16453479" />
    <title>Comment from Hawkins on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Hawkins</name>
        <uri>http://www.hawkinsdale.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hawkinsdale.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16450452" rel="nofollow">Jack T Ripper</a>: Mr. Ripper is correct.  My 250cc Piaggio maxi-scooter keeps up with traffic on the highway, has full-size motorcycle wheels (for stability), a huge wind-reducing fairing, and usually gets over 75 mpg.</p>
<p>Plus it looks Italian, which I think is cool.</p>
<p>Cost:  you could probably find a year-old one for $2,800.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16453046</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16453046" />
    <title>Comment from MrPenny on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>MrPenny</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Ordered a scooter over the Internet?  From a company based in Miami through another company in California?</p>
<p>"Caveat Emptor"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16453015</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16453015" />
    <title>Comment from synimatik on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>synimatik</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447687" rel="nofollow">cecilsaxon</a>: Right. Because blaming the OP for getting royally screwed makes total sense in this situation. You're comment lends nothing. Who cares if he wanted to go 200mph? This scooter doesn't deliver what it promised. End of story. How is he at fault?</p>
<p>Well done, idiot.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16452966</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16452966" />
    <title>Comment from nagumi on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>nagumi</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447478" rel="nofollow">pgh9fan1</a>: *Steve Gutenberg Cackle*</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16452828</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16452828" />
    <title>Comment from ktetch on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>ktetch</name>
        <uri>http://ktetch.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ktetch.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16445802" rel="nofollow">Dondegroovily</a>: I think the (wrong) perception that it's green it the biggest hurt of all, and one the OP shares. Electric vehicles are NOT green. Aside from the pollution caused by the battery production, you've got a lot more energy loss in charging it (and the conversions the power does on its route from the power station) meaning more produced to start with, meaning more pollution.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16452383</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16452383" />
    <title>Comment from bwcbwc on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>bwcbwc</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16451466" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: People, please turn on your irony and sarcasm detectors. It might help interpret the GP.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16452288</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16452288" />
    <title>Comment from bwcbwc on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>bwcbwc</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16451429" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: A lot of that gain in efficiency at the generating plant is lost due to transmission of the electricity over distance. I think you still come out ahead with electric, but it isn't cut and dried either.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16452281</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16452281" />
    <title>Comment from bwcbwc on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>bwcbwc</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16451462" rel="nofollow">Rachacha</a>: Not to mention geothermal, hydroelectric, nuclear, wind and (for all I know) squirrel power.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16451486</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16451486" />
    <title>Comment from Rachacha on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rachacha</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16447789" rel="nofollow">DeeJayQueue</a>: The OP said he lived in Upstate NY. If he lives in the Buffalo or surrounding area, his electric provider generates most of its power through hydri-electric plants on the Niagra River. If he is in the Rochester area, most of his electric power is generated by Nuclear at the Ginna Nuclear Power Plant <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginna_Nuclear_Generating_Station" rel="nofollow">[en.wikipedia.org]</a></p><br />
<p>Both of these technologies are very green</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16451466</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16451466" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16450697" rel="nofollow">Cant_stop_the_rock</a>: My favorite part was where in one sentence, he calls all scooters "Goremobiles" then in the next he announces he's bought ten over the years.<br />
What's next, he'll be admitting he has Al Gore's face tattooed on his bicep? Because buying <b>ten</b> "Goremobiles" is a bit over the top. Such obvious Gore fanboyishness would make <b>me</b> blush, and I'm a San Francisco kid.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16451462</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16451462" />
    <title>Comment from Rachacha on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rachacha</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16446578" rel="nofollow">msquier</a>: Solar, but yeah, unlikely that the OP will be installing a solar panel simply o charge his scooter.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16451429</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16451429" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447789" rel="nofollow">DeeJayQueue</a>: Err, I'm unsure of YOUR moped, but mine lacks a $120m scrubber at the end of its exhaust pipe. (Not that as many of the power plants that should have them do, thanks to Bush's waiver to power plants being retrofitted, but I digress).<br />
I'd also bet the average 2-stroke engine gets less energy/gallon than a plant burning equivalent coal or petrol. And less sampling to ensure my moped complies with state and Federal standards, or ways to punish me when I'm caught cheating versus power plants.<br />
...Not TOO ridiculous on its face, eh?</p>
<p>Although, obviously, there's no free lunch here. But one is a bit more affordable.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16451310</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16451310" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447339" rel="nofollow">Difdi</a>: Actually, no.<br />
Although, that's what corporate lawyers would love you to believe. <i>Evil</i> class-action lawyers!!<br />
In many cases, the offenses they sue for are ones that are immensely profitable for a company to commit fraud - or outright theft - from consumers, knowing the few individuals that sue for the individual pittance of several hundred dollars will be low.<br />
The perfect crime, really. Except for class action suits, which stop them dead in their tracks, plus penalties, all overseen by courts to insure that plaintiff lawyers' fees are reasonable.</p>
<p>...Or you're of the mind that corporations should be able to commit these kinds of frauds with no fear?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16451170</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16451170" />
    <title>Comment from drjayphd on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>drjayphd</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447236" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: Eh, anyone following the Cowboys might be able to pass the bar. Then again, you might as well hand out JDs to every Bengals fan ever...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16451070</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16451070" />
    <title>Comment from sleze69 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>sleze69</name>
        <uri>http://www.thereheis.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thereheis.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16447339" rel="nofollow">Difdi</a>: If it is only $2800, wouldn't small claims court be a good way to get a judgement?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16451060</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16451060" />
    <title>Comment from sleze69 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>sleze69</name>
        <uri>http://www.thereheis.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thereheis.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16445802" rel="nofollow">Dondegroovily</a>: Take it easy on the sleze ;)</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16450906</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16450906" />
    <title>Comment from wvFrugan on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>wvFrugan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16447236" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: <br />Usually what you see from them looks like they are DJs, particularly with regard to actual (dare I say practical) application of law to any specific situation. Usually all I see is a C game, at best, brought to the field here (and thus completes my comment with an obligatory football analogy!).</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16450724</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16450724" />
    <title>Comment from silver-bolt on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>silver-bolt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16448458" rel="nofollow">Esquire99</a>: And as Amazon learned in NY, advertising online and selling to NY consumers means they have to pay/collect taxes for NY.</p>
<p>Online commerce would meet that "solicitation of business through promotional material" metric of the second case.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16450697</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16450697" />
    <title>Comment from Cant_stop_the_rock on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cant_stop_the_rock</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16449575" rel="nofollow">oneliketadow</a>:</p>
<p>Why silence him?  Let the idiocy shine!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16450692</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16450692" />
    <title>Comment from silver-bolt on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>silver-bolt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447339" rel="nofollow">Difdi</a>: You need to realize that a Class Action lawsuit for a class of 100~500 would net different results compared to a class action of a million people.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16450474</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16450474" />
    <title>Comment from H3ion on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>H3ion</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16450446" rel="nofollow">Esquire99</a>: Thanks again.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16450452</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16450452" />
    <title>Comment from Jack T Ripper on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jack T Ripper</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>A couple points...</p>
<p>1.  In my state you have to have a vehicle in for service multiple times for the same problem within a certain period of time to qualify as a lemon.  This scooter was merely not as advertised.  There is probably a limiter on it somewhere that keeps it from exceeding 32 mph.</p>
<p>2.  You paid $2800 for that???  You must have stupid written all over your face.  $2800 will get you a 250cc scooter that will go 50 or 60 mph AND get over 70 mpg.  And you will actually be able to get out of the way faster if necessary.  You are a sucker to pay $2800 for some Chinese built piece of crap scooter when you could have bought a perfectly good used Honda for practically the same price.</p>
<p>3.  The point about your weight is legitimate.  If you are too heavy then it will impair the weak sauce electric motor from going the top speed.  Maybe you are just too big to ride that little toy around and should explore getting a real scooter.  You could have gotten a Metropolitan that goes faster than that and probably is just as green.  Considering that electricity doesn't grow on trees and the manufacturing of the power for your scooter probably is equally harmful to the environment than what a little scooter actually produces, you really are looking at apples and apples.  Use the excuse of going green when you buy an electric H2 or something, but not when you buy a scooter.  Lame.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16450446</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16450446" />
    <title>Comment from Esquire99 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Esquire99</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16450395" rel="nofollow">H3ion</a>: <br />
Post office can investigate, but it doesn't have exclusive right to do so. Postal Inspector is basically just a law enforcement agency.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16450395</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16450395" />
    <title>Comment from H3ion on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>H3ion</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16450353" rel="nofollow">Esquire99</a>: Thanks.  I don't litigate and haven't in a very long time (which may be obvious) but doesn't the Postal Inspector's office have to make the referral to DOJ?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16450356</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16450356" />
    <title>Comment from Joey_Brill on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joey_Brill</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16449751" rel="nofollow">Shadowman615</a>: or 45km/h - 27.9 mph.</p>
<p>Like my Mini cooper, this baby just stops recording when you floor past 25mph.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16450353</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16450353" />
    <title>Comment from Esquire99 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Esquire99</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16449948" rel="nofollow">H3ion</a>: <br />
The DOJ prosecutes mail fraud, not the PO.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16449948</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16449948" />
    <title>Comment from H3ion on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>H3ion</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16449877" rel="nofollow">Esquire99</a>: I'm used to the "means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce" which is what the SEC uses to get jurisdiction.  They've been successful in asserting jurisdiction with a phone call, even though it was within a single state.  It's really tough for a person with a small judgment to go to another state to sue on the judgment and if he found Florida counsel to handle it, the cost may be more than the recovery.  Maybe the PO will lend a hand, especially if this EVT company is shipping this crap all over the country.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16449877</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16449877" />
    <title>Comment from Esquire99 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Esquire99</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16449831" rel="nofollow">H3ion</a>: <br />
Interstate mailings via private carriers are sufficient to satisfy the "mailing" requirement of 18 USC 1341 (the mail fraud statute).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16449831</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16449831" />
    <title>Comment from H3ion on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>H3ion</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Just a thought...I don't know how the bike was shipped.  If it had any connection with the USPS, including mailing of advertisements into New York, a mail fraud claim may lie.  This is handled by the Post Office and will give the scooter company more fits than St. Vitus Dance if the PO decides to take it on.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16449819</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16449819" />
    <title>Comment from Laura Northrup on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Laura Northrup</name>
        <uri>http://www.lauriebird.com/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lauriebird.com/blog">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16449738" rel="nofollow">MumblesFumbles</a>: I see your point, but even if it were carrying more weight than it were designed to, wouldn't the speedometer still reflect the actual speed that the vehicle is going?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16449796</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16449796" />
    <title>Comment from H3ion on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>H3ion</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447532" rel="nofollow">Esquire99</a>: You're correct but you can't levy on the judgment until it's enrolled (or granted by) the second state.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16449751</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16449751" />
    <title>Comment from Shadowman615 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shadowman615</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16448161" rel="nofollow">bigroblee</a>: 32km/h =~ 20 miles/h.  So probably not.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16449738</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16449738" />
    <title>Comment from MumblesFumbles on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>MumblesFumbles</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'll put this as delicately as I possibly can but there's no easy way to ask this.  How much does the aggrieved person weigh?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16449575</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16449575" />
    <title>Comment from oneliketadow on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>oneliketadow</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16448616" rel="nofollow">Snarkysnake</a>: Didn't we used to have moderators here?  If so, please disemvowel this moron.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16449491</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16449491" />
    <title>Comment from cristiana on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>cristiana</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447988" rel="nofollow">Dondegroovily</a>:  I didn't say sleazy, i said interesting, however, if you look at their dealings with Fisker, various vaporware  announcements, and other financial issues, you can classify their dealings as interesting.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16449278</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16449278" />
    <title>Comment from Esquire99 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Esquire99</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16449085" rel="nofollow">sonneillon</a>: <br />
Notice that the judgment is in NY and the company is in Miami.  Then, read the above comment/thread on Foreign Judgments.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16449101</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16449101" />
    <title>Comment from mythago on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>mythago</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5394703/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund#c16448309" rel="nofollow">Crim Law Geek</a>: Rendering an opinion ("there is nexus") and then claiming it's not legal advice is a dangerous road to go down, as you will find out when you pass the bar somewhere.</p><br />
<p>fantomesq is nominally correct in that you can get a judgment in one state enforced in another in many cases, but it ain't easy. The OP should talk to a collections attorney.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16449085</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16449085" />
    <title>Comment from sonneillon on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>sonneillon</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>He has a judgment, sounds like it's time for levys and writs of execution.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16448904</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16448904" />
    <title>Comment from Cant_stop_the_rock on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cant_stop_the_rock</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16448616" rel="nofollow">Snarkysnake</a>:</p>
<p>It is not the OP's fault that the company made unrealistic but believable claims about their product.  The OP's failure to research his purchase doesn't excuse their bad act.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16448835</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16448835" />
    <title>Comment from frodolives35 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>frodolives35</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Why does China have favored trade status. The high % of crap they export to us has got to end. Its a shame the have us by the short hairs by owning so much US debt. I guess I just answered my own question.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16448806</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16448806" />
    <title>Comment from Englishee Teacher on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Englishee Teacher</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16446043" rel="nofollow">lockdog</a>: Was he Korean? This is standard practice for scooters in Korea. Even if the police see you, they'll either do nothing, or pull you over and tell you that you need to drive *slowly* through red lights.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16448616</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16448616" />
    <title>Comment from Snarkysnake on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Snarkysnake</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm blaming the OP here for being an ignorant ,lazy dumbass.</p>
<p>A cursory examination of the EVT "America" website would have told this guy that the scooter is made in China.</p>
<p>CHINA , DUMBASS !!</p>
<p>Anyone who has ever owned a scooter or small motorcycle could have told him that his little two wheeled Goremobile probably wouldn't make it out of the 90 day warranty period without problems.( Not reaching a safe 40-45 MPH to keep up with traffic is a BIG problem).<br />
I have owned probably 10 scooters over the years and its pretty common knowledge that Chinese products are unsafe ,unreliable and unsupported from the manufacturer. They are mostly (poor) knockoffs of successful Japanese designs that are built down to a price to be sold to impulse price shoppers. He deserves what he got and I hope the NY AG has better things to do than try to nail the postal drop box "sales office " to the wall on this.</p>
<p>It's the damn OP's fault.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16448458</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16448458" />
    <title>Comment from Esquire99 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Esquire99</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16448309" rel="nofollow">Crim Law Geek</a>: <br />
I don't think that's entirely true.  We don't know enough facts about the company's activities w/i New York to conclude that they do have personal jurisdiction over it.  From the annotations to NY CPRL 302</p>
<p>" The first subparagraph of subdivision (a) provides for long arm jurisdiction if defendant "transacts any business within the state." This has been construed literally so that defendant or his agent must have been physically present in the state at some relevant time (Kramer v. Vogl, 17 NY 2d 27). Shipment of goods plus other general activities in the state such as solicitation of business through promotional material can suffice and these other contacts need have no direct connection to the cause of action arising out of the particular shipment (Singer v. Walker, 15 NY 2d 443). "</p>
<p>It seems that simply shipping a good to NY, without more, is insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16448309</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16448309" />
    <title>Comment from Crim Law Geek on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Crim Law Geek</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447259" rel="nofollow">feckingmorons</a>: <br />
There is Nexus to NY. In fact, one of the basis for jurisdiction under the NY CPLR 302(1), personal jurisdiction attaches to anyone who "transacts  any  business within the state or contracts anywhere to  supply goods or services in the state" or " expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in  the  state  and  derives  substantial  revenue  from  interstate  or international commerce" (CPLR 302(1)(ii).</p>
<p>Selling a bike to someone who lives in NY is a contract to "supply goods or services" in New York, thus giving NY Courts jurisdiction.</p>
<p>This is also not legal advice.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16448195</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16448195" />
    <title>Comment from fantomesq on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>fantomesq</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16445918" rel="nofollow">Chinchillazilla</a>: I'm wondering if the OP couldn't cause EVT serious headaches by contacting Miami's Weights and Measures division about the erroneous speedometers... It won't get him his $2800 though.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16448161</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16448161" />
    <title>Comment from bigroblee on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>bigroblee</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16445995" rel="nofollow">acvicari</a>: @<a href="#c16445797" rel="nofollow">cowboyesfan</a>: You know... it crossed my mind that although it may say MPH due to an error in translation or some such that may have been meant to be KPH.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16448141</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16448141" />
    <title>Comment from fantomesq on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>fantomesq</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447619" rel="nofollow">Karita</a>: I'm not familiar with the NY lemon law process either. If the judgment the OP refers to is an arbitration judgment, not the judgment of a court of law then my suggestions do not hold.</p>
<p>Easy solution - check with the Sheriff's department in Miami and find out if you have anything they can act on. I should also note that it is YOUR job, not the Sheriff's to determine what property you are seeking them to seize.</p>
<p>My comments were not intended as legal advice but simply a course of action that could be pursued to attempt to collect your judgment.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447999</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447999" />
    <title>Comment from Esquire99 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Esquire99</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447654" rel="nofollow">Karita</a>: <br />
I'm sure it is probably easy, but some states (like Missouri, IIRC) make it harder.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447988</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447988" />
    <title>Comment from Dondegroovily on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dondegroovily</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16446772" rel="nofollow">cristiana</a>: Tesla is totally legit and not sleazy. That had all the problems you would expect from a start-up building something entirely new.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447974</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447974" />
    <title>Comment from fantomesq on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>fantomesq</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447224" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: Right. The Attorney General may well decide to take his own action on behalf of his state based upon this letter because they feel it is a particularly egregious case but usually they only take action after they get several complaints about a company... While the OP's circumstantial evidence that HIS scooter could not get the specified MPH, that certainly doesn't mean that other scooters even of the same make couldn't. Kudos to the OP on getting his judgment... he's 90% of the way to reaching his goal.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447867</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447867" />
    <title>Comment from Pixel on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Pixel</name>
        <uri>http://www.blert.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.blert.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16446278" rel="nofollow">Shappie</a>: Yup, needs to read within 5mph of actual speed.</p>
<p>There was a car company (can't recall which) that sometime in the last decade got in big legal trouble for the fact their speedometers were off and as such they showed more miles on the odometer than had actually been traveled. They were sued for bilking customers out of their full warranty coverage (if you've only gone 33K but the odometer says you've gone 36K and your warranty was for 36K you see the problem). Ended up having to extend the warranty and repay out of warranty repairs if I recall correctly.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447789</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447789" />
    <title>Comment from DeeJayQueue on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>DeeJayQueue</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447266" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: <br />
</p><blockquote>Yup, because every energy source on the planet has the same efficiency and carbon footprint.</blockquote>
<p>No, that's true it doesn't.  And not every fuel source comes from turrists.</p>
<p>However, overwhelmingly electricity comes from very dirty sources, both morally and environmentally.  If it's not petroleum it's coal.  In the US there aren't many Nuclear, Hydroelectric, solar or wind farms.  Not nearly as many as in other countries, and almost none measured by landmass.</p>
<p>So, saying electric vehicles are greener simply because they don't directly burn gasoline pretty ridiculous on its face, and when you compare the costs of generation and transportation and time to re"fuel" an electric vehicle to, say, a comparable motorcycle or motorscooter which gets well over 100mpg, it makes you look just as silly as you're trying to make the previous commenter look.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447733</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447733" />
    <title>Comment from lockdog on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>lockdog</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16446212" rel="nofollow">msquier</a>:Apologies. I didn't mean to trash all bikers. I know the number of polite, safe riders is vastly greater than the weirdos on the scooters and college kids on crotch rockets. Same thing goes for people traveling under pedal power. At my old job I loved my 4 season bicycle commute. Luckily, my current job is moving offices, and soon my commute will be a five minute walk. I just hope my boss doesn't use this fact as a way to avoid giving me a raise!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447709</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447709" />
    <title>Comment from The Cheat on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>The Cheat</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>All Chinese import scooters suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck and I doubt these are an exception. They always use the cheapest parts and materials. Also, it's pretty much up to the importer to provide warranty support on their own dime since the smaller manufacturers have extremely unreliable repair part supplies.</p>
<p>Your $900 150cc scooter will likely be a $900 lesson learned when the frame welds break and the engine parts start wearing out from poor assembly. The company I used to work for would have to spend an extra couple hours fixing various manufacturing flaws when they uncrated a new scooter.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447687</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447687" />
    <title>Comment from cecilsaxon on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>cecilsaxon</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Who wants to go 45 MPH on that thing? I think the guy that bought it was disillusion or at least very gullible.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447654</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447654" />
    <title>Comment from Karita on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Karita</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447145" rel="nofollow">Esquire99</a>: But shouldn't it be a fairly simple process to get the judgment entered in the foreign court? I've done it in a few states, and it just took a filing fee. Never tried in Florida, but I'd think they also have to respect foreign judgments.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447619</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447619" />
    <title>Comment from Karita on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Karita</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447259" rel="nofollow">feckingmorons</a>: Fantomesq sounds fairly correct, considering I'm doing the same thing for a few of my clients right now. Your response, on the other hand, doesn't actually make any sense to me.</p>
<p>But it's true - never take legal advice over the internet. Too many differences between the states.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447568</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447568" />
    <title>Comment from HurtsSoGood on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>HurtsSoGood</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16446578" rel="nofollow">msquier</a>: But electricity can be made by a number of methods, many of which do not involve handing over billions of dollars to people who hate our guts.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447532</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447532" />
    <title>Comment from Esquire99 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Esquire99</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447259" rel="nofollow">feckingmorons</a>: <br />
Perhaps I don't understand the NY Lemon Law process.  I assumed (probably mistakenly) that he had simply brought a civil suit based on the NY Lemon Law.  You seem to be indicating that the Lemon law process in NY is via arbitration.</p>
<p>I suppose I didn't fully explain the foreign judgment comment.  In some (many? all?) states, you can take a judgment awarded in NY and file it as a foreign judgment in FL.  Once you do that, you can use the FL courts (and their law enforcement) to collect on that judgment.  The process varies state-to-state and some states allow the other party to be heard before they will grant/certify a foreign judgment.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447478</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447478" />
    <title>Comment from pgh9fan1 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>pgh9fan1</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16445802" rel="nofollow">Dondegroovily</a>: I blame the lack of electric cars on the Stonecutters.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447339</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447339" />
    <title>Comment from Difdi on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Difdi</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16445843" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: Given the OP wants his money back OR what he paid for, a class action suit would be the LAST thing he'd ever want to do.  It's pretty typical for a class action lawsuit to pay millions to the lawyers, and give each member of the class a small coupon or a few bucks.<br />
 <br />
If you're trying to get a $2800 refund, you probably can't get it via a class action lawsuit.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447266</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447266" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447125" rel="nofollow">nakkypoo</a>: Yup, because every energy source on the planet has the same efficiency and carbon footprint.<br />
If you put as much work into knowing about which you speak as you do in HTML formatting, you'd be a more interesting writer.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447259</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447259" />
    <title>Comment from feckingmorons on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>feckingmorons</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16447027" rel="nofollow">Esquire99</a>: It is not a foreign judgment it (may be I don't see OP mentioning the arbitration or $250 filing fee for the NY AGO Lemon Law Arbitration) as the dealer was in Miami and thus no nexus, so not subject to the NY AGO's arbitration.</p><br />
<p>If fantomesq is giving legal advice he is simply wrong.</p><br />
<p>This is not legal nor tax advice.  If you need legal or tax advice seek a competent professional in your locale.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447236</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447236" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16446030" rel="nofollow">fantomesq</a>: Trust a football guy (Cowboys, no less) to try correcting someone on affairs legal who actually has earned a JD...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447224</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447224" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16445905" rel="nofollow">fantomesq</a>: But if this is a "feature" of EVT's products, what of the customers who haven't filed, have a Plantation mentality or aren't even aware they've been ripped off?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447192</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447192" />
    <title>Comment from rte148 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>rte148</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>well, if they had only used Monster cable to recharge the thing...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447145</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447145" />
    <title>Comment from Esquire99 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Esquire99</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447006" rel="nofollow">CompyPaq</a>: <br />
The company is not based in NY, thus the NY courts and NY law enforcement don't have the power to attach property.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447125</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447125" />
    <title>Comment from nakkypoo on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>nakkypoo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote>1. It is all electric which would allow me to save energy and be more "green."</blockquote>
<p>Out of sight, out of mind, right? Where does he think electricity comes from? In all likelihood, something is being burned.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447103</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447103" />
    <title>Comment from CompyPaq on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>CompyPaq</name>
        <uri>http://facebash.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://facebash.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>According to the NYS lemon laws, the company owes him $25/day for every day they refuse to comply up to $500. Courts are also permitted to force the company to pay him for fees he incurred in getting them to comply.</p>
<p><a href="http://lemonlaw.org/www%20nationwide/newyork_lemonlaw.html" rel="nofollow">[lemonlaw.org]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447027</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447027" />
    <title>Comment from Esquire99 on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Esquire99</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16445926" rel="nofollow">cowboyesfan</a>: <br />
He's actually correct, and he's not really giving legal advice; he's merely explaining a court procedure.  Many states allow you to file a "foreign judgment" (may be called something else, depending on the state).  However, some states allow for these judgments to be challenged in the "new" state (Especially if the judgment was by default) and they can be expensive to file.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447007</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447007" />
    <title>Comment from CompyPaq on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>CompyPaq</name>
        <uri>http://facebash.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://facebash.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16447006" rel="nofollow">CompyPaq</a>: *Them not him</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16447006</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16447006" />
    <title>Comment from CompyPaq on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>CompyPaq</name>
        <uri>http://facebash.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://facebash.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>If the NYS lemon law authority ruled in his favor, can't he go to the sheriff's department and have a lein placed against him?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16446967</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16446967" />
    <title>Comment from chrylis on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>chrylis</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16446041" rel="nofollow">meltingcube</a>: IANAL, but I don't believe that small-claims court will help.  He already has a legal judgment against the company, and they're just refusing to pay up.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16446952</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16446952" />
    <title>Comment from CompyPaq on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>CompyPaq</name>
        <uri>http://facebash.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://facebash.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16446029" rel="nofollow">FooSchnickens - Forklift Dirver Extraordinaire</a>: It could also cause his odometer to be inaccurate also, which can cause further issues down the road.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16446806</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16446806" />
    <title>Comment from ivanthemute on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>ivanthemute</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16446041" rel="nofollow">meltingcube</a>: "that its top speed is actually only 32mph, while at the same time the speedometer reads 45mph."  It's not a matter of the weight of the rider.  It's the fact that the speedometer is saying he's doing 45, when he's actually doing 32.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16446772</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16446772" />
    <title>Comment from cristiana on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>cristiana</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16445802" rel="nofollow">Dondegroovily</a>: <br />
There are a few electric vehicle companies that have shady business practices. The company Zap has a long history of pretty much making stuff up, and selling crappy vehicles. Also, the company Tesla, with their hyped roadster has had a lot of 'interesting' dealings.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16446578</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16446578" />
    <title>Comment from msquier on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>msquier</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>From my standpoint (I've done a bit of research on scooters and motorcycles) it doesn't seem likely from looking at it, that this little scooter could EVER reach 45MPH. I've got a little Honda 125cc motorcycle in my garage that can barely reach 55 MPH. It gets about 100 MPG but isn't good for anything more than local travel.</p>
<p>Basically my point is that if you want green and fast, go down to your local motorcycle dealer and check out the selection of small motorcycles and scooters that can actually hit highway speeds.</p>
<p>Remember, it takes emissions to create electricity too!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16446467</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16446467" />
    <title>Comment from mianne on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>mianne</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16446041" rel="nofollow">meltingcube</a>: That's not the issue. If the scooter was designed to reach top speed with a max load of 150 pounds, the OP exceeds that weight, thus only moves 32 MPH *AND* the speedometer reflects this; then OP either needs to lose weight or he needs to buy a more powerful scooter.</p>
<p>However, if the speedometer says the OP is going 45 MPH, he damned well ought to be going 45 MPH.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16446278</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16446278" />
    <title>Comment from Shappie on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shappie</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5394703/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund#c16445918" rel="nofollow">Chinchillazilla</a>:</p><br />
<p>Isn't it against the law to have an inaccurate spedometer?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16446249</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16446249" />
    <title>Comment from Laura Northrup on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Laura Northrup</name>
        <uri>http://www.lauriebird.com/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lauriebird.com/blog">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c16446043" rel="nofollow">lockdog</a>: Sounds like the cyclists in my city.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16446212</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16446212" />
    <title>Comment from msquier on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>msquier</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16446043" rel="nofollow">lockdog</a>: Real bikers don't pull garbage like that lockdog. Only squids and idiots who think that being green on their little scooter makes them above the law do that.</p>
<p>BTW: A "squid" is a sportbiker term for a young, inexperienced rider often on a bike with too much power for their experience level (above 600cc on an ultra light sport bike) doing stupid things to show off. Most sportbikes get wrecked pretty quickly when a newb gets a hold of one. My husband rides a 250cc Kawasaki Ninja and he says, from an experienced rider's standpoint, that it has plenty of power for highway travel.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16446128</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16446128" />
    <title>Comment from trmentry on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>trmentry</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16445884" rel="nofollow">fantomesq</a>:</p>
<p>This happened to Dell.... kinda.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/10/disgruntled-dell-customer-finds-crafty-path-to-lawsuit-settlemen/" rel="nofollow">[www.engadget.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16446062</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16446062" />
    <title>Comment from The_Red_Monkey on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>The_Red_Monkey</name>
        <uri>http://www.theredmonkey.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theredmonkey.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well it seems like NY would not want them selling these vehicles in their state. How did they pass their DOT or do they have to do so there?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16446043</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16446043" />
    <title>Comment from lockdog on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>lockdog</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I was passed by one of these the other day. I say passed because, while we were traveling in the same direction, I was stopped behind traffic at a light. Undeterred, he crossed into the left hand lane and continued on. Not just traveling on the yellow line like I've come to expect from` motorcyclists, but all the way across three lanes of oncoming traffic, where he continued traveling into the middle of the intersection. About halfway through the intersection, he changed his mind, did a u-turn and decided to start driving on the sidewalk.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16446041</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16446041" />
    <title>Comment from meltingcube on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>meltingcube</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Possibly the scooter will go up to 45 MPH depending on the weight of the rider.  However, I don't think I've ever come across an electric scooter that can do more than around 30 MPH.  Based on the information provided, small claims court should be able to get his money back.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16446030</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16446030" />
    <title>Comment from fantomesq on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>fantomesq</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16445926" rel="nofollow">cowboyesfan</a>: With all due respect, I've got my degree.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16446029</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16446029" />
    <title>Comment from FooSchnickens - Full of SCAR on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>FooSchnickens - Full of SCAR</name>
        <uri>http://www.f00tography.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.f00tography.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16445995" rel="nofollow">acvicari</a>: An inaccurate speedometer is also illegal in many states.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16445995</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16445995" />
    <title>Comment from AnthonyC on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>AnthonyC</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16445797" rel="nofollow">cowboyesfan</a>:</p>
<p>No, in fact, it is quite different.</p>
<p>The numbers on those amps or speakers, 1-10 or 1-11, are dimensionless- they arbitrarily cover a number of decibels from some unnamed minimum to some unnamed maximum.</p>
<p>The numbers on this spedometer have units, mph. An inaccurate spedometer is not just inconvenient; can be dangerous. Consider, too, that many highways have a minimum speed limit higher than 32mph, but less than 45 mph. Even if he didn't care that it takes him longer to get places at 30mph than it would at 45, it certainly will matter when he is in a rush, or, in an emergency, needs to speed up and finds out he can't.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16445926</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16445926" />
    <title>Comment from cowboyesfan on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>cowboyesfan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16445884" rel="nofollow">fantomesq</a>:</p>
<p>You might want to finish that law degree before giving out legal advice.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16445918</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16445918" />
    <title>Comment from Chinchillazilla on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chinchillazilla</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Seems like a significant problem to have a speedometer not tell you your actual speed.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16445905</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16445905" />
    <title>Comment from fantomesq on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>fantomesq</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16445843" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: I suspect that the Attorney General's office might well have considered his case BEFORE he got his judgment and that that might have resulted in a class action. They aren't about to collect his judgment for him though - that's what sheriffs are for.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16445884</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16445884" />
    <title>Comment from fantomesq on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>fantomesq</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I believe he can file for a judgment lien and get the Miami Sheriff to levy upon (seize) EVT America's property - locate any land or inventory that they own and the sheriff can seize it to settle the judgment... I suspect a check might be cut right quick after a sheriff's visit.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16445843</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16445843" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It sounds like false advertising and would be an excellent candidate for class action status, since their business models seems predicated on suckering customers interested in a faster electric scooter into overspending for what is, basically, a volume control that goes to "11". Then figuring individual buyers won't go through the pain and expense of suing individually.</p>
<p>Here's hoping they sue Consumerist for this posting, so their #1 Google hit will be this story, or Cash4Golding, as I prefer to call it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16445802</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16445802" />
    <title>Comment from Dondegroovily on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dondegroovily</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This kinda sleaze probably does a lot more to harm the electric vehicle market than oil companies ever could.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703-comment:16445797</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:beta.consumerist.com,2009://1.5394703" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/11/evt-america-delivers-slow-inaccurate-scooter-no-lemon-law-refund.html#c16445797" />
    <title>Comment from cowboyesfan on 2009-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>cowboyesfan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If it took him a couple of months to figure out that he wasn't going 45 mph, whats the point?</p>
<p>Its kinda like the amplifiers that only go up to 10 instead of 11.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-13T21:34:20Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



