<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T10:50:30Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Walmart Tries To Pass Off Antique As HDTV</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5374336" title="Walmart Tries To Pass Off Antique As HDTV" />
    <published>2009-10-05T19:56:31Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-05T19:46:41Z</updated>
    <title>Walmart Tries To Pass Off Antique As HDTV</title>
    <summary>--&gt;Shawn spotted Walmart selling an old CRT TV, mislabeling it as an HDTV. He snapped the accompanying incriminating photos and writes:</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Phil Villarreal</name>
      <uri>http://becauseitoldyouso.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Walmart" />
    
    <category term="Walmart" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[
<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/consumerist/2009/10/lctv2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />-->Shawn spotted Walmart selling an old <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathode-ray_tube">CRT</a> TV, mislabeling it as an HDTV. He snapped the accompanying incriminating photos and writes:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Drove into [redacted], CT this past weekend to meet up with a friend, and he needed to pick up a digital picture frame. So we went to Wal-Mart.</p>
<p>We walked in and it immediately smelled like someone crapped themselves, but I digress.</p>
<p>While I was skipping through the electronic aisles, I stumbled across a CRT TV. I was like "WHOA. I didn't even know these were still in stock".</p>
<p>$188. The price was rolled back. Nice.</p>
<p>But wait. Whats this? 27" LCD HDTV? All the specs line up to the TV in question (stunning 480i resolution)...but it's LCD...HDTV? I think not.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The mistake is probably exclusive to this Connecticut Walmart, <a href="http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=9856472">as the website seems to have it right</a>, but if you spot a similar mislabeling drop us a line.</p>
<p><img src="http://consumerist.com/images/consumerist/2009/10/lctv.JPG" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<p><img src="http://consumerist.com/images/consumerist/2009/10/lctv2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15859128</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15859128" />
    <title>Comment from temporaryerror on 2009-10-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>temporaryerror</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15844277" rel="nofollow">bwcbwc</a>: <br />
It's ok as long as it has a digital tuner.  Digital tuner doesn't always equal HD tuner.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-07T21:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15857152</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15857152" />
    <title>Comment from PunditGuy on 2009-10-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>PunditGuy</name>
        <uri>http://thestew.badmouth.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://thestew.badmouth.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805444" rel="nofollow">esp13</a>: So it's okay to mislabel items on a shelf if you've got a template for the incorrect information? Don't think so. I don't think the state's AG office would look too kindly on it either.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-07T20:35:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15850827</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15850827" />
    <title>Comment from mrearly2 on 2009-10-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>mrearly2</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I do wish (my fellow) Americans would leave off the redundant "D" in "LCD".  We know the damned things are displays, so why not just say "LC"?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-07T10:25:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15844621</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15844621" />
    <title>Comment from Skunky on 2009-10-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Skunky</name>
        <uri>http://www.furaffinity.net/user/valden/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.furaffinity.net/user/valden/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805465" rel="nofollow">GitEmSteveDave_IsWaving</a>: I once had a Phillips-Magnovox CRT TV that only had its one and only A/V connection in the front.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-07T03:51:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15844277</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15844277" />
    <title>Comment from bwcbwc on 2009-10-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>bwcbwc</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15812198" rel="nofollow">plamoni</a>: Isn't it illegal to sell standard def tv's now? Or is standard def OK as long as it has an ATSC (HD) tuner.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-07T03:34:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15836498</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15836498" />
    <title>Comment from oneandone on 2009-10-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>oneandone</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5374336/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv#c15828998" rel="nofollow">LeChiffre</a>: That kind of effect bugs me also. It reminds me of telenovellas (sp?) which have their own unique style and generally are not to my liking. I like the softer, dramatic, 'film' look.</p><br />
<p>You can probably adjust the settings on the TV so that it doesn't have that effect. It's usually called 'smooth motion' and can be off, low, or high.</p><br />
<p>It can be useful to have it when watching hockey or other quick sports where you want the TV to be able to interpolate parts of the image that weren't actually filmed. I'm not sure if this is actually what it does, but that's how I understand it.</p><br />
<p>Anyway, you might be able to turn that setting off - check the manual or click around the settings menu.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-06T22:54:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15828998</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15828998" />
    <title>Comment from LeChiffre on 2009-10-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>LeChiffre</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5374336/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv#c15806076" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: My roommate bought a 52" Samsung 6 series from Costco and the movies are really good. I've been watching the Planet of the Apes movies and the quality is superb. Although my gripe with this TV is that when watching Bond movies, the picture has an odd realism as though it is being filmed on stage in a reality TV sort of way. Know what I mean? It's almost too good for these types of movies. At times I swear that I can plainly see the stage lighting move across Connery's face as though I were there watching him get filmed. IMO, that is not high definition but more like "reality TV". I like my HD 57" Toshiba rear-projection TV better because it shows movies as "movies".</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-06T18:50:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15826165</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15826165" />
    <title>Comment from RvLeshrac on 2009-10-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>RvLeshrac</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5374336/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv#c15811963" rel="nofollow">lannister80</a>:</p><br />
<p>Was hoping someone would point that out.</p><br />
<p>There are still millions of CRT HDTVs out there that are flat, widescreen, and will display all HD resolutions.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-06T12:00:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15813245</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15813245" />
    <title>Comment from johnarlington on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>johnarlington</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5374336/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv#c15806987" rel="nofollow">G.O.B.: Come on!</a>:</p><br />
<p>I personally prefer Magnetbox my self</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-06T00:29:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15812198</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15812198" />
    <title>Comment from plamoni on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>plamoni</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805444" rel="nofollow">esp13</a>: Sounds reasonable. Another possible explanation might be that someone was confusing "digital" with "HD" again. I saw a lot of that when around the time of the digital switch (in February and June). People seem to think that "digital" and "hd" are the same thing. This TV is "digital" (as in, it has an ATSC tuner -- which, I believe, all modern TVs are required to have) but it's not HD.</p>
<p>But I wouldn't be surprised of some under-paid and under-trained Wal-Mart associate might have thought that any TV that can get digital broadcasts is an "HDTV."</p>
<p>But that wouldn't explain the "LCD" part. As this is obviously a CRT TV.</p>
<p>(PS - CRT HDTVs do exist... I had a friend who got one in college).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T23:53:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15811963</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15811963" />
    <title>Comment from lannister80 on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>lannister80</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Be aware that CRT HDTVs do exist.</p>
<p>My father in law has a gigantic tube TV (38" or so) that does 480i, 480p, and 1080i.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T23:47:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15811724</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15811724" />
    <title>Comment from Corporate_guy on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Corporate_guy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>No big deal.  They slap on descriptions like SDTV and 480i to trick you into thinking it's something new.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T23:39:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15810649</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15810649" />
    <title>Comment from TVGenius on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>TVGenius</name>
        <uri>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3845570794205845895</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3845570794205845895">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805465" rel="nofollow">GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite</a>: Something like that... if you look at the website and the TV in the photo, the ports/logo don't match.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T23:06:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15810464</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15810464" />
    <title>Comment from shepd on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>shepd</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15807083" rel="nofollow">Cant_stop_the_rock</a>:</p>
<p>It will receive and play all valid ATSC signals.  It just can't display them in all their HD glory.</p>
<p>Hence, it is an HDTV *receiver*, but not an HDTV *display*.  And that is why it clearly states it is a 480i display device, and that is why it also states that "HDTV", because it can receive, and playback HDTV signals, albeit not with true 1080p fidelity.</p>
<p>This is exactly the same as, for example, the WDTV.  It has only 2 channel audio outputs, however it displays the Dolby Digital logo.  It includes a true Dolby Digital certified and licensed *decoder*, however the fact you are told on the box it only has stereo output means that, in fact, it will decode the 5.1 channel audio into stereo.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T23:00:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15810263</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15810263" />
    <title>Comment from Bunnies_Attack! on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bunnies_Attack!</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15807655" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: There's actually a pretty big difference with the 360. I used my 360 on an SD TV once at a friend's place and the text in Dead Rising was unreadable. Literally unreadable, it was about 3 pixels tall (yea, I think they fixed this later). Either way, you're going to be missing out on a lot of detail on a standard def screen.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T22:53:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15810189</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15810189" />
    <title>Comment from LastError on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>LastError</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15807083" rel="nofollow">Cant_stop_the_rock</a>: No, it will just down-convert them to 480i.  Same thing the cheap HD boxes do.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T22:51:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15810141</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15810141" />
    <title>Comment from Jfielder on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jfielder</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>The real story here is that someone expects to recieve 188 dollars for a 27" Sansui CRT TV... A couple years ago, just before CRTs were phased out of most of the stores, I picked up a 26" Magnavox from Wally World for 125...</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T22:49:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15809876</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15809876" />
    <title>Comment from chiggers on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>chiggers</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805480" rel="nofollow">rpm773</a>: The odor may have something to do with the senior citizen greeters that Wal-Mart places at the front of their stores.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T22:39:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15809840</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15809840" />
    <title>Comment from drjayphd on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>drjayphd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805418" rel="nofollow">suburbancowboy</a>: Depending on where in CT this is, they may not know the joys of Target. Although if it smelled like someone crapped themselves, I'll blame Wallingford. ;)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T22:38:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15809801</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15809801" />
    <title>Comment from drjayphd on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>drjayphd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15807831" rel="nofollow">HurtsSoGood</a>: Nah, it'd be more in eastern CT, where there's no one to intrude upon your life.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T22:37:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15809129</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15809129" />
    <title>Comment from Powerlurker on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Powerlurker</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15806583" rel="nofollow">Harry Manback</a>:</p>
<p>My parents' 36" Sony WEGA is pretty sweet.  It does 1080i and makes a beautiful image.  The only problem is that the damn thing weighs over 250 lbs, almost all of that is in the front 6-8 inches of the TV.  Sony later made a 40" version which was even heavier.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T22:15:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15809047</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15809047" />
    <title>Comment from Powerlurker on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Powerlurker</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15806432" rel="nofollow">PLATTWORX</a>:</p>
<p>I for one, don't particularly care.  Walmart's issues with their employers and suppliers are between them and their employers and suppliers, not me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T22:12:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15808972</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15808972" />
    <title>Comment from Powerlurker on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Powerlurker</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15808893" rel="nofollow">Powerlurker</a>:</p>
<p>But it will only output at 480p if you have a progressive scan DVD player.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T22:10:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15808893</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15808893" />
    <title>Comment from Powerlurker on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Powerlurker</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15806410" rel="nofollow">unpolloloco</a>:</p>
<p>A non-upscaled DVD running through component video connections is capable of outputting at 480p.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T22:07:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15808891</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15808891" />
    <title>Comment from wrjohnston19283 on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>wrjohnston19283</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5374336/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv#c15805465" rel="nofollow">GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite</a>:</p><br />
<p>The tag itself claims it's an HDTV, but then lists 480i resolution.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T22:07:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15808703</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15808703" />
    <title>Comment from GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite</name>
        <uri>http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15807831" rel="nofollow">HurtsSoGood</a>: Do they have unlisted SS#'s there as well?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T22:01:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15808243</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15808243" />
    <title>Comment from Cant_stop_the_rock on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cant_stop_the_rock</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Add one to the list - SS t-shirts (that's the SS of World War II Nazi fame)</p>
<p><a href="http://consumerist.com/213960/" rel="nofollow">[consumerist.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T21:46:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15808198</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15808198" />
    <title>Comment from Smashville_OrderingOJandTakingNames on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Smashville_OrderingOJandTakingNames</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5374336/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv#c15807512" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: It's a genuine Sorny.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T21:44:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15807831</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15807831" />
    <title>Comment from HurtsSoGood on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>HurtsSoGood</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805615" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: I actually thought there was an actual town called Redacted, CT.  You know, where privacy-minded Nutmeggers and Joe Lieberman live.  But I digress.</p>
<p>This is probably a copy/paste thing, and whoever was making the labels wasn't quite paying attention.  I've seen worse.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T21:30:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15807696</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15807696" />
    <title>Comment from The Porkchop Express on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>The Porkchop Express</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5374336/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv#c15806076" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: Nobody needs to count the stuble on Jason Statham's face in any movie. At least I don't think they do.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T21:26:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15807655</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15807655" />
    <title>Comment from nstonep on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>nstonep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15806410" rel="nofollow">unpolloloco</a>: Well...I run it through dvi because I have a non-hdmi xbox but I believe that would be greater than 480i but I'm not finicky with the details of resolution because it strikes me as nerdy and like the guy who get's the "sports edition" of some car.  It might perform somewhat better but if it can't cook me a hamburger and fries and cure sweaty boot rash then I just don't care.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T21:25:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15807630</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15807630" />
    <title>Comment from TheSpatulaOfLove on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>TheSpatulaOfLove</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15807206" rel="nofollow">nbs2</a>:</p>
<p>As I said before, Hypocrisy!  The Amurrican Way!</p>
<p>Personally, I'll drive past three WalMarts to shop elsewhere and will only go to Walmart when I have no other choice.</p>
<p>On the occasions that I have shopped at Walmart and had a Customer service issue, for the most part, they have handled it to my satisfaction.</p>
<p>That's not to say that I am in agreement with their business practices.  At a few points in my career, I have been engaged with them as a vendor and have chosen to avoid being a customer due to how I and the companies I worked for were treated.   Sure, it's business, but in this case, it shook me to the core and changed my personal beliefs.</p>
<p>The point of my original post was more the hypocrisy shown by other people when that type of person would chastise me for my choice in vehicle, yet run over to Walmart to feed the monster they blame for the woes of the nation - all to save 50c on a package of toilet paper or whatever.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T21:24:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15807553</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15807553" />
    <title>Comment from nstonep on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>nstonep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805465" rel="nofollow">GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite</a>: Looking at the English on their website (yes I checked...no crts listed however) maybe the packaging is wrong.  Stranger things have happened.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T21:21:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15807512</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15807512" />
    <title>Comment from nstonep on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>nstonep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15806987" rel="nofollow">G.O.B.: Come on!</a>: "Is Sony guts!"</p>
<p>I technically prefer funai!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T21:19:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15807206</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15807206" />
    <title>Comment from nbs2 on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>nbs2</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5374336/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv#c15806889" rel="nofollow">TheSpatulaOfLove</a>: Wasn't it just a few days ago that we were celebrating an Above and Beyond moment starring WM? Already, we're back to ripping into the company...</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T21:08:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15807083</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15807083" />
    <title>Comment from Cant_stop_the_rock on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cant_stop_the_rock</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15806456" rel="nofollow">shepd</a>:</p>
<p>No... digital and HD are not interchangeable.  It can receive a 480i ATSC signal, but don't expect it to do anything with a 720p or 1080i ATSC signal.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T21:03:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15807024</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15807024" />
    <title>Comment from GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite</name>
        <uri>http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805303" rel="nofollow">RevancheRM</a>: I think Phil listened to the same audio book version of Pygmy by Chuck Palahniuk that I did, and they keep saying "redacted" when referring to parts in the book blacked out with marker.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T21:01:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806987</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806987" />
    <title>Comment from G.O.B.: Come on! on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>G.O.B.: Come on!</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>But it's a top-of-the-line Sansui, come on!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T21:00:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806975</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806975" />
    <title>Comment from Megalomania on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Megalomania</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15806101" rel="nofollow">adrew</a>: You can also still find some HD 16:9 CRT monitors floating around for very high prices.  CRTs do have better color reproduction by their nature than LCD screens and so haven't quite yet gone away</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T21:00:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806889</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806889" />
    <title>Comment from TheSpatulaOfLove on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>TheSpatulaOfLove</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15806432" rel="nofollow">PLATTWORX</a>:</p>
<p>Jumping in before the Capitalist apologists tear this thread to ribbons...</p>
<p>My favorite is walking through the parking lot with all the big pickup trucks and SUVs with 'Buy American' and UAW bumper stickers, all loading up on that cheap Walmart merchandise.   These are the same people that look down their noses at me and my 'damned America-hating foreign car'.</p>
<p>Hypocrisy!   The Amurrican Way!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:57:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806863</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806863" />
    <title>Comment from Skankingmike on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Skankingmike</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15806410" rel="nofollow">unpolloloco</a>: I think you mean 720i or if you have a progressive scan then it's 720p only ones that go higher are HD DVD's and Blue rays which are 1080i/p respectively.</p>
<p>and there is a huge difference between CRT and LCD if you have a digital source.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:56:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806862</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806862" />
    <title>Comment from vastrightwing on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>vastrightwing</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Would you like Monster with that LCD TV?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:56:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806583</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806583" />
    <title>Comment from Harry Manback on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Harry Manback</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805827" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: flat != lcd.  There are flat screen CRT tvs.  CRT = cathode ray tube, not curved.  It has nothing to do with the screen itself, but rather the technology used to generate the picture.  I know more than one person that has an HD, flatscreen, CRT tv, they are just heavy as hell and the tech is outdated.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:47:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806469</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806469" />
    <title>Comment from katstermonster on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>katstermonster</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I am very curious as to whether this is one of the Wal-Marts near me that I DON'T go to.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:43:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806467</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806467" />
    <title>Comment from firemunkie on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>firemunkie</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5374336/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv#c15805722" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: i want a crt hdtv, been tryin to get one for my gaming as plasma gets image retention and burn-in and lcd has problems with scrolling. i own both type and am happy with niether.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:43:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806456</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806456" />
    <title>Comment from shepd on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>shepd</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15806339" rel="nofollow">Brontide</a>:</p>
<p>Bingo.  This is 100% accurate advertising.  All TVs sold in the USA capable of receiving broadcast TV MUST be able to receive an HDTV broadcast.</p>
<p>Way to overreact, consumerist.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:43:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806432</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806432" />
    <title>Comment from PLATTWORX on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>PLATTWORX</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5374336/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv#c15805418" rel="nofollow">suburbancowboy</a>:</p><br />
<p>So right! I always shed a silent tear when I see people going into our local Walmart in droves. Do they not realize those prices come from low wages, poor benefits, etc. for Walmart employees?</p><br />
<p>How many better paying retailers have been run out of business because of Walmart? The list is endless.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:42:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806410</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806410" />
    <title>Comment from unpolloloco on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>unpolloloco</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805615" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: That's because DVD's output to 480i, a resolution that both TV's can display.  You need an HD source to get a HD picture.  The LCD should upscale the picture a bit, though, so you should get a picture that looks (slightly) better on it (maybe).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:42:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806360</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806360" />
    <title>Comment from danger the pirate on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>danger the pirate</name>
        <uri>http://♥★</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://♥★">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805827" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: they make flat crts, too. i have one. they also make flat hd crts.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:40:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806339</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806339" />
    <title>Comment from Brontide on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Brontide</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It can *receive* HDTV, just look at the label.  It has to convert the signal to 480i for display though.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:40:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806261</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806261" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5374336/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv#c15806114" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: But if it <i>isn't</i> a HDTV, and someone thinks it is, they're obviously not getting what they paid for.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:37:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806114</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806114" />
    <title>Comment from nstonep on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>nstonep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805862" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: Actually...hdtv for under 200 bucks even if it weighs 100 pounds is a pretty good deal for a second tv unless you want to go scouring craigslist.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:33:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806109</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806109" />
    <title>Comment from GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite</name>
        <uri>http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805630" rel="nofollow">Moosehawk</a>: Yeah, they just seem to want to appear smart, bless their heart.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:33:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806101</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806101" />
    <title>Comment from adrew on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>adrew</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805722" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>:</p>
<p>Yup, I have a Sony KB-34XBR970 34" widescreen CRT HDTV.  It weighs 200 lbs. but has the best picture of any HDTV I've seen, to this day.</p>
<p>Info:<br />
<a href="http://www.crutchfield.com/S-01LUOEzGfma/p_15834XB970/Sony-KD-34XBR970.html" rel="nofollow">[www.crutchfield.com]</a></p>
<p>Lots of companies grafted digital tuners onto old standard-def, square tube TVs and, yes, they'll display high-definition and digital signals -&nbsp;in low-def and letterboxed.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:33:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806081</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806081" />
    <title>Comment from h3llc4t, breaker of office dress codes on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>h3llc4t, breaker of office dress codes</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805465" rel="nofollow">GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite</a>: That was my guess too.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:32:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806076</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806076" />
    <title>Comment from nstonep on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>nstonep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805885" rel="nofollow">YOXIM</a>: Yeah...it's called an exaggeration.  I doubt they're the same resolution but I don't give a flip; looks good enough, I don't need to count the stubble on Jason Statham's face in Ghost of Mars thank you very much.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:32:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15806071</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15806071" />
    <title>Comment from Wang_Chung_Tonight on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Wang_Chung_Tonight</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm shocked that the Ph.D students that work at WalMart would make such a mistake. They should ask their Ivy League schools for their money back.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:32:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805981</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805981" />
    <title>Comment from Smashville_OrderingOJandTakingNames on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Smashville_OrderingOJandTakingNames</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5374336/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv#c15805745" rel="nofollow">zwizer25</a>: Way to miss the point.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:29:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805953</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805953" />
    <title>Comment from Smashville_OrderingOJandTakingNames on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Smashville_OrderingOJandTakingNames</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5374336/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv#c15805418" rel="nofollow">suburbancowboy</a>: BINGO!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:28:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805949</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805949" />
    <title>Comment from RonDiaz on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>RonDiaz</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805722" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: I have a 30" Sanyo CRT HDTV I picked up on clearance a few years ago from Wal-mart.  At the time it was an awesome price top enter the world of HD.  It is still my only HDTV, and besides the fact it is a pain to move because it is heavy and akward, it's been a darn nice TV.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:28:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805885</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805885" />
    <title>Comment from YOXIM on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>YOXIM</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805615" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: I highly doubt the resolution claim. I'm not entirely sure exactly what resolution DVDs output to, but that's the resolution they output to EVERY TV they are connected to. Therefore if you had like a 5 year old TV and a brand new one, the DVDs would be shown at the same resolution. At least that's my educated guess (more of a wild stab in the dark really, but eh).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:25:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805862</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805862" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5374336/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv#c15805745" rel="nofollow">zwizer25</a>: But for every person that notices this, there's a person who thinks this is an awesome deal. The problem is, how many people who notice this will say something to the associate, and how many associates will actually do something about it?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:24:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805827</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805827" />
    <title>Comment from nstonep on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>nstonep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805722" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: After thinking...it's possible this actually HAS an LCD screen just the exterior is fubar...couldn't tell you without looking at it to see if the screen is FLAT (LCD) or CURVED (CRT).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:23:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805745</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805745" />
    <title>Comment from zwizer25 on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>zwizer25</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Way to freak out over nothing.. you could have just told an associate and they probably would have fixed it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:19:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805722</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805722" />
    <title>Comment from nstonep on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>nstonep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm trying to remember if there were upgraded crt televisions with better resolution.  I can't recall what they were called but I KNOW these existed.</p>
<p>Go figure I just looked it up and there WERE/ARE High definition CRT televisions.  Consumerist...you guys got it at least partially wrong.  Look up SONY KV-32HS420 Direct View.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:18:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805630</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805630" />
    <title>Comment from Moosehawk on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Moosehawk</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805480" rel="nofollow">rpm773</a>: I swear people put these parts into stories JUST so they can say "but I digress"</p>
<p>Still, I feel it was somewhat necessary. =P</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:15:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805615</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805615" />
    <title>Comment from nstonep on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>nstonep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805303" rel="nofollow">RevancheRM</a>: Yeah really...all towns in Connecticut are bumfubar.</p>
<p>Still...I swear my 20 year old GE RF tv get's equal resolution to my big screen lcd tv (at least with dvds).  Man...that's a rock solid tv.  I remember playing NES on it when it first came out, now I'm running an xbox 360 through there! (well...when it works)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:15:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805480</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805480" />
    <title>Comment from rpm773 on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>rpm773</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote>We walked in and it immediately smelled like someone crapped themselves, but I digress.</blockquote>
<p>Oh, that's ridiculous and unnecessary.  But I laughed.</p>
<p>Whoever smelt it, dealt it?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:09:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805465</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805465" />
    <title>Comment from GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite</name>
        <uri>http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, No, all the other "specs" don't line up.  I see front mounted AV jacks, but the tag says there is only 1 AV jack.  Also, the "recommend" section lists HDMI cables, but no HDMI port is listed.  I am guessing some employee put the wrong spec tag under the wrong TV.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:09:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805444</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805444" />
    <title>Comment from esp13 on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>esp13</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>They probably have a template to quickly add the TV specs and print out a shelf label... and since they don't sell many (if any) CRT's anymore, someone forgot to change the  now standard LCD HDTV heading. Nothing to see here, move along.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:08:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805418</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805418" />
    <title>Comment from suburbancowboy on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>suburbancowboy</name>
        <uri>http://piningforthechords.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://piningforthechords.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>First mistake was deciding to go to Wal-Mart.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:07:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805393</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805393" />
    <title>Comment from Chinchillazilla on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chinchillazilla</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15805303" rel="nofollow">RevancheRM</a>: Consumerist policy, I think. They don't want to make it easy for Wal-Mart to just fix one store if it's really a widespread problem.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:06:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805392</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805392" />
    <title>Comment from shalegac on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>shalegac</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5374336/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv#c15805364" rel="nofollow">shalegac</a>: edit... $8.97</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:06:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805364</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805364" />
    <title>Comment from shalegac on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>shalegac</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>But you're saving $1.87! That is a good deal no matter what your label reads.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:05:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336-comment:15805303</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5374336" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-tries-to-pass-off-antique-as-hdtv.html#c15805303" />
    <title>Comment from RevancheRM on 2009-10-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>RevancheRM</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Question: why is there a need to redact the town? I can understand last names, but I'm honestly in the dark on why specific locations need to be.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T20:02:56Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



