<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T10:50:47Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Walmart Thinks Woman Is Laundry Soap Thief, Refuses Return</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5380375" title="Walmart Thinks Woman Is Laundry Soap Thief, Refuses Return" />
    <published>2009-10-13T18:35:23Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-13T23:40:35Z</updated>
    <title>Walmart Thinks Woman Is Laundry Soap Thief, Refuses Return</title>
    <summary>--&gt;When a soon-to-be mother realized she had bought the wrong laundry detergent at a New Mexico Walmart, she tried to return it. That didn&apos;t work out so well, ending up with the store manager insinuating she was a con-artist who replaced the detergent with water. </summary>
    <author>
      <name>Phil Villarreal</name>
      <uri>http://becauseitoldyouso.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Other Customer Service" />
    
    <category term="Walmart" />
    
    <category term="Walmart" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/consumerist/2009/10/walmarts.jpg" width="158" height="140" />-->When a soon-to-be mother realized she had bought the wrong <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged LAUNDRY DETERGENT" title="Click here to read more posts tagged LAUNDRY DETERGENT" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/laundry-detergent/">laundry detergent</a> at a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NEW MEXICO" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NEW MEXICO" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/new-mexico/">New Mexico</a> Walmart, she tried to return it. That didn't work out so well, ending up with the store manager insinuating she was a con-artist who replaced the detergent with water. </p>
<p>Here's the letter she wrote to Walmart Corporate Headquarters:</p>
<blockquote><p>To Whom It May Concern,</p>
<p>I am writing to let you know of the worst <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CUSTOMER SERVICE" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CUSTOMER SERVICE" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/customer-service/">customer service</a> experience I have ever had at a Wal-Mart store, which happened yesterday October 11, 2009. </p>
<p>I went to the Wal-Mart Supercenter, store #[redacted]to make an exchange. I had purchased two weeks earlier from store #[redacted] a bottle of Spray & Wash "Bright & White" laundry additive. After I got home with it, I realized I had bought the wrong kind; I only wanted the regular Spray & Wash laundry stain remover. I had not used a single drop out of the bottle. I had my receipt with me and I was well within the 90 day period. It should have been a simple exchange, right? </p>
<p>Well, as it turned out, no. I waited patiently for 10 minutes at the Customer Service desk. I explained what happened (as mentioned above). The girl waiting on me poured out some of the liquid into the cap and then poured it back into the bottle and sniffed it. Apparently - they have had people use a bottle of laundry detergent, then refill it with water & then return it. She told me to go get what I needed and come back for an exchange only. I explained that I had several other items to pick up too. She told me then to go through the regular line with my items, just don't let them ring up the new bottle of Spray & Wash and they'll exchange it then. OK...I wasn't happy about the extra trip but fine. So, I did my shopping, checked out (another 10 minutes in line) and went back to customer service. When it was my turn again (after waiting another 7 minutes) - they told me that a manager by the name of "Peter" was refusing the exchange. They told me that the liquid was "watered down" and "missing half of its contents".  I was furious, but I kept my cool - they were essentially calling me a liar and a thief – without actually saying it. I explained that it was that consistency when I purchased it, that Spray & Wash Bright and White was thinner than regular laundry detergent, etc. They either didn't care or were too stupid to figure it out. So, I asked to speak to another manager. It wasn't about the money - it was a matter of principal at this point. </p>
<p>Before the other manager could show up to address the matter &mdash; a lady named "Gabby" called out from the back, that to "go ahead and just handle it". She reversed the decision the other manager had made. They marked out as defective the bottle I originally bought (even though there was nothing wrong with it!) and then exchanged it for the one I needed. </p>
<p>It was stupid, humiliating and made me just plain angry. I have never had such a misery-inducing, wretched customer service experience before. I was well within the exchange policy they have posted behind the customer service desk.  I will never visit Wal-Mart store #[redacted] again. And I'm seriously considering just doing my shopping at local grocery stores and Target from now on, as result of this visit. I'm 9 months pregnant and to make anyone suffer through that indignity is just plain wrong &mdash; regardless if they are pregnant or not! If a few bad apples are scamming the store by returning bottles of laundry detergent &mdash; that is not the fault of the rest of us honest people who have legitimate returns for products we purchase &mdash; and we should not be punished as such. </p>
<p>I wanted to make you aware of this sort of bad service that is being given and how matters are being handled at this Wal-Mart location.</p></blockquote>
<p>The way the Walmart operated is a good way to get customers to shop somewhere else. Has anyone else had trouble returning detergent to Walmart or other stores?</p>
<p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/coastercrash/3623958834/">oamg823</a>)</p>
]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:20003977</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c20003977" />
    <title>Comment from Soap Making Machines on 2009-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Soap Making Machines</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting case where you can see the monopoly of the world's largest retailer.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-11-30T13:15:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16112358</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16112358" />
    <title>Comment from burnedout on 2009-10-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>burnedout</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15988177" rel="nofollow">bobateaforyouandme</a>: I said it was a wedding gift - ordered off the online registry and sent to my house.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-19T09:03:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16112343</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16112343" />
    <title>Comment from burnedout on 2009-10-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>burnedout</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15988278" rel="nofollow">bobateaforyouandme</a>: I said "with a gift receipt."  Why do you have to be so mean?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-19T09:02:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16064057</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16064057" />
    <title>Comment from MooseOfReason on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>MooseOfReason</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16012491" rel="nofollow">erratapage</a>: Well, I guess I'm just crazy, but I check the ingredients on just about everything I buy.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-16T12:02:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16057130</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16057130" />
    <title>Comment from zephypyre on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>zephypyre</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c16057077" rel="nofollow">zephypyre</a>: Also, the mexican grocery has waaaaaaaaay better detergent.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-16T05:00:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16057077</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16057077" />
    <title>Comment from zephypyre on 2009-10-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>zephypyre</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Sweet. We of the New Mexico non-giant grocery store shopping ilk welcome you to our fold. Look around yourself (yes, I realize she's probably not reading this article) and take notice of the smaller, locally owned joints (and the giant mexico groceria in the south valley) with generally shorter lines and better products. There's no reason to go in to a walmart in new mexico.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-16T04:57:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16029309</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16029309" />
    <title>Comment from kelrod on 2009-10-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>kelrod</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982468" rel="nofollow">michigan2cv</a>: Amen to that.  If you clip coupons and shop the sales, Meijer can be just as low-priced as Walmart.  Hopefully I'll never set foot into a Walmart again.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-15T09:26:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16027492</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16027492" />
    <title>Comment from krista on 2009-10-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>krista</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16019093" rel="nofollow">magus_melchior</a>: I agree that it's regional. I have never had any issues returning things to WalMart, and they don't check receipts unless you go out through the Garden Center (which I actually understand &amp; submit to).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-15T07:43:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16025643</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16025643" />
    <title>Comment from crutnacker on 2009-10-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>crutnacker</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I do think this is terrible service, but read this blog.  It's old, but it details the regular scams pulled on Wal Mart.    It's quite funny.</p>
<p><a href="http://bbcamerican.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">[bbcamerican.blogspot.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-15T06:23:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16024817</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16024817" />
    <title>Comment from 339point4 on 2009-10-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>339point4</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c15982227" rel="nofollow">pot_roast</a>: The "I'm pregnant" thing isn't just asking for special treatment, it's letting the powers-that-be know that the customer who is unhappy with them is one who is about to spend lots of money on an additional human being. <br />Soon-to-be parents have more clout in the retail world not because they're supposed to be treated as if they're the first people in the world to reproduce, but because they are in a position to drop thousands of dollars on baby stuff while doing so.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-15T05:35:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16021244</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16021244" />
    <title>Comment from mannymix03 on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>mannymix03</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I lost any respect for the OP when she said that the employees were "too stupid" elitist attitudes like that piss me off, so what they work at wal-mart, they may have been laid off and have fallen on hard times, I know some people from college who have their degree, had a great job and got downsized and laid off and now work at target, wal-mart, etc. In addition, If people should be treated the same if they are pregnant or not why did you mention that you were pregnant? Oh for extra sympathy. And i don't see what her problem was with the whole shopping thing, you had to go through the line anyway, what difference did it to switch the order of the two around, and while I absolutely hate wal-mart (for their ethics and how they treat employees) I have to say that they should check this to prevent more scams, when some people scam the system it makes products more expensive for the rest of us. Plus the woman got what she wanted, i don't get what she's complaining about.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-15T02:55:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16019093</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16019093" />
    <title>Comment from magus_melchior on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>magus_melchior</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981871" rel="nofollow">Falcon5768</a>: This is probably more of a regional problem than institutional. The Wal-Marts in my area tend to have pretty good return policies and courteous service. I'm sure if I went to a Wal-Mart out in the sticks somewhere or in a crime-laden city, they'd treat everyone like a potential criminal.</p>
<p>The bottom line here is usually the store manager-- is he an ass or a good guy?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-15T01:43:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16018381</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16018381" />
    <title>Comment from jc364 on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>jc364</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>: Come on, does there have to be this comment on every Walmart related post?</p>
<p>Yes, 50 cents (more or less) per item is definitely worth it, especially when buying a couple weeks' worth of groceries. It adds up.</p>
<p>As for the the spray and wash, I would have suggested that they find another bottle of the stuff and compare the amount/consistency of the contents.  Otherwise, they have no basis for comparison, and they cannot rightly say that the product was watered down.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-15T01:20:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16015462</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16015462" />
    <title>Comment from West Coast Secessionist on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>West Coast Secessionist</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15985136" rel="nofollow">AustinTXProgrammer</a>: tangent: I used to think Safeway was worth the few cents extra for the great service and immaculate store. Then I moved to the SF Bay where most of their stores haven't been remodeled since 1989, are filled with unhelpful staff who mainly communicate only with each other, in whatever their native language is, have one checkstand open with a line stretching down the aisle, and are habitually out of stock of the most basic staples (green onions? Diet Coke? WTF!! I would rather buy groceries at Walmart (they don't have those in my part of the bay though).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T23:53:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16012491</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16012491" />
    <title>Comment from erratapage on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>erratapage</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return?skyline=true&amp;s=x#c16001007" rel="nofollow">MooseOfReason</a>: You've never done this before? I am a diet coke fiend. NOTHING else will do. Yet, I've accidentally bought caffeine free diet coke and cherry diet coke before. How does it happen? It just does. I mean... you're pregnant, you're tired, you're hungry, you have to go to the bathroom, you're dying to get out of the Walmart dungeon?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T22:22:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16012406</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16012406" />
    <title>Comment from erratapage on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>erratapage</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return?skyline=true&amp;s=x#c15989716" rel="nofollow">ToddMU03</a>: Yes, let's also not mention that the person is disabled or that it was purchased as a gift for Toys for Tots or whatever. Honestly, it's fine. It's a small mention of a personal detail in a big complaint. I remember that one time, I had a horrendous customer service experience waiting for a prescription at Walgreens. My husband had just had surgery and was waiting for me in the car. Do you think I didn't mention that in the complaint letter?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T22:19:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16012120</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16012120" />
    <title>Comment from erratapage on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>erratapage</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return?skyline=true&amp;s=x#c15986715" rel="nofollow">thezone</a>: Wow. If my husband did that, I'd probably think twice about staying married. I don't need him second-guessing where I bought his toothpaste. That kind of micromanagement is what's wrong with some marriages.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T22:10:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16009739</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16009739" />
    <title>Comment from M.M. on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>M.M.</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>This Monday, I tried to make a money transfer to New Mexico at my nearest (Hallandale, FL) Walmart. I specifically told the clerk "It's New Mexico, not Mexico". So, it seemed to go smoothly.</p><br />
<p>The next day, the recipient calls me and tells me she is having trouble withdrawing the money. Apparently, Walmart tried to send the money to New Mexico! I went back to the store and talked to the clerk - it was the same girl from the day before. I asked "Do you know where New Mexico is?", I asked. She said she didn't. I told her it was in the US, next to Texas. She responded "Oh, well you learn something new every day!"...Appalling.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T20:55:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16009482</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16009482" />
    <title>Comment from M.M. on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>M.M.</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I've never had a problem with Walmart (except on one occasion when I bought a pair of shoes and was almost charged double for them), perhaps because I never linger - I get what I need and get out.</p><br />
<p>This Monday, I tried to make a wire transfer to New Mexico at my nearest (Hallandale, FL) Walmart. I specifically told them "It's New Mexico, and not Mexico", and everything seemed to go fine. The next day, I got a call from the recipient of the transfer, saying she was unable to withdraw the money - it turns out they tried to wire it to Mexico! So I went back to talk to the girl at the desk - it was the same person. I asked her "Do you know where New Mexico is?", she responded "No". I told her it was in the US, next to Texas. "Oh, well you learn something new every day" is what she said. Appalling.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T20:47:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16008729</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16008729" />
    <title>Comment from bobateaforyouandme on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>bobateaforyouandme</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15996571" rel="nofollow">mythago</a>: Oh, riiiiight.  Getting laid off must be because you're bad at your job.  It's not because the company decides that the people who were hired year X get laid off because they need to conserve money.  I think the word you were looking for was "fired".</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T20:22:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16005789</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16005789" />
    <title>Comment from bkdlays on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>bkdlays</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I love how no matter how bad Wal Mart gets, people always have an excuse.  "ya I know walmart treats their employess like shit, brings dangerous products into our country, destroys entire communities, etc.. but I really like the savings so I have to shop there"</p>
<p>BS!  There is always an alternative, or somewhere else to save in your life.  Its all about having morals people.   I compare this with buying stolen goods off the street.  You know its a good deal, but you know it comes with a price.  Some people would buy it without a problem, and some people wouldn't.</p>
<p>Do your homework on Walmart before you keep shopping there.   <a href="http://wakeupwalmart.com/" rel="nofollow">[wakeupwalmart.com]</a></p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T18:09:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16004821</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16004821" />
    <title>Comment from RandomZero on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>RandomZero</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15981839" rel="nofollow">I_Elohel</a>: I am, actually. A few years back, I worked for a subcontractor to a number of area retailers (including Wal-Mart) doing bike assembly and repair. Wal-Mart consistently had bullshit returns that would've been laughed out of other stores - like the guy who insisted he was pedaling so fast he'd set the bike on fire, or the skinny guy who sat on his bike and the entire frame just bent in a U-shape - sideways (ie, had been run over by a car). It got so bad that my employer actually instituted a minimum three-hour labour charge if the customer was obviously lying.</p><br />
<p>We were told by a good friend, and the manager of one of the Wal-Marts, that company policy was that no return was to be refused, as long as it had the proper paperwork and the customer didn't flat-out admit to destroying it.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T16:23:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16004530</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16004530" />
    <title>Comment from Cool story bro on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cool story bro</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15988327" rel="nofollow">mariospants</a>: You'd be in the foreground?</p>
<p>Zing!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T15:21:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16004423</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16004423" />
    <title>Comment from nomdeplume123 on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>nomdeplume123</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Wow, makes me really appreciate the now gone Linens and Things store. I bought an iron there a couple of years ago. Took it home unopened, and when I opened it I found I had bought my self an old, scuffed up, dirty, used iron. When I took it back to Linens n Things ad told them that someone must have previously switched in their old iron they replaced it right away, apologized and did not make me feel like they thought I did it. I guess they saw my anger was genuine.<br />Person who switched irons did a darn good job sealing the box so that it looked brand new.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T14:53:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16004379</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16004379" />
    <title>Comment from Syntania on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Syntania</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I worked for a brief amount of time at a Wal-mart "customer service" desk and here's a brief listing of things I got to handle on a regular basis:</p><br />
<p>the "laundry soap" return<br />the "item not as described on the package" return (also known as the 'old switcharoo. Examples of this one: Buying a new computer and putting your old 486 in the box to return it, grabbing a tag off of a similar item that is more expensive and tacking it onto your item, especially nice if the item is a store brand of another store, etc.)<br />the "bought it at the dollar store and returning it here" return<br />the "I used it for a month but it's too expensive to keep so I'm just basically renting it" return (a favorite for seasonal things like lawnmowers and swimming pools)<br />the "I won't admit I'm as fat as an elephant and bought a too small size, wore it and ruined it" return</p><br />
<p>What a lot of people don't realize is that these returns (that do happen frequently) cost the companies a lot of money, therefore sometimes they do have to become jerks to try to rescue their bottom lines. Unfortunately, this does tend to spill over onto the decent customers with legitimate complaints.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T14:44:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16003905</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16003905" />
    <title>Comment from wild homes loves you but chooses darkness! on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>wild homes loves you but chooses darkness!</name>
        <uri>http://starwars.wikia.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://starwars.wikia.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15988177" rel="nofollow">bobateaforyouandme</a>: If you paid closer attention, she was returning a gift she received for her wedding. Is it plausible that someone bought the gift three months before the wedding? I don't find it that hard to believe, really. She did say she tried to return it <i>immediately</i> after opening it upon receipt, and seeing the obvious damage.</p>
<p>Target's gift return policies are very harsh. I can understand why they cracked down, but it definitely hurts the innocent.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T12:56:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16003883</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16003883" />
    <title>Comment from wild homes loves you but chooses darkness! on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>wild homes loves you but chooses darkness!</name>
        <uri>http://starwars.wikia.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://starwars.wikia.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16002472" rel="nofollow">jecowa</a>: Wal-Mart's return policy (in general) is a bit more comprehensive and well thought-out than Target's, though. Target gets hit for a lot of money in a lot of ways, and it's almost invariably their own fault. I can remember a couple of years ago, Target didn't place serial numbers on XBOX360 consoles on the purchase receipts-- so Target became the go-to store for people who had broken 360s... just let yours break, buy the new one, and return the old one in the box. Now, because the 360 has a manufacture date ON THE CONSOLE, the Target employees could tell easily that a lot (if not all) these returns were bogus, but management would direct the service desk employees to accept all returns with receipt. The story has a happy ending, though-- Microsoft began to refuse credit for the bogus returned consoles once it became apparent Target was just a clearinghouse for illegitimate busted 360s. And when consider the known failure rate for that hardware, we're not talking a small number of devices. All of this would've been solved by simply putting the machine's serial number on the receipt, but Target refused-- for a period of YEARS-- even when they automagically inserted the serial number on the receipt of EVERY OTHER CONSOLE AND HANDHELD THEY SOLD.</p>
<p>But my favorite scheme Target fell prey to (I can't say if it still works, I don't talk much anymore to the people I knew who did it) involved coupon skimming. You'd walk into Target, buy maybe a dozen of some new item that carried a big coupon (on your credit or debit card)-- I remember someone I knew liked the stupid automatic shower-washing thing from Scrubbing Bubbles because it had a $15 instant coupon that was printable online (and Target accepted one <i>per item</i>, even if you bought all of them on the same transaction-- and then you go home, and come back the next day to return them. Generally, they'd look at your receipt, see exactly what you did, and get the manager, who'd give you one hell of a lot of trouble, and generally deny your return or try to only give you the amount you actually <i>paid</i> after the coupons. But Target's transaction lookup by card didn't factor in coupons and also didn't provide store personnel with any way to actually see the original transaction-- so if you kept your mouth shut, handed them your card, and pushed the merchandise over the counter, you'd walk out with no questions asked, and a profit of fifty, one hundred, two hundred dollars.</p>
<p>I knew people who didn't work, and did this for a <i>living</i>. I never felt good enough about it to follow their lead, but I admired their gumption.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T12:51:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16003444</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16003444" />
    <title>Comment from Buffet on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Buffet</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>There's no such word as "alot".@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15982003" rel="nofollow">yentaleh</a>:</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T11:26:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16003067</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16003067" />
    <title>Comment from nevesis on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>nevesis</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16002265" rel="nofollow">IfThenElvis</a>: @<a href="#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>:</p>
<p>Compared Wal-Mart grocery prices to Super Target and Hy-Vee here.</p>
<p>Hy-Vee was the cheapest.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T10:32:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16002879</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16002879" />
    <title>Comment from RickRussellTX on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>RickRussellTX</name>
        <uri>http://brainscroll.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brainscroll.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982227" rel="nofollow">pot_roast</a>:</p>
<p>No part of the customer service experience should involve badmouthing the customer and trying to intimidate them.</p>
<p>Either (1) determine that this is an exception case  and enforce it with a smile and "I'm sorry we couldn't help you today" or (2) apply the same policy as you do for everything else.</p>
<p>I've worked in customer service in one form or another my entire life, and if you can't turn every cheek on your body and give service with a smile, you do not belong in the service business.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T10:11:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16002878</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16002878" />
    <title>Comment from lytnngseed on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>lytnngseed</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I can't believe she's surprised that Wal-Mart hires inept adults to manage their stores and work at the Customer Service desk.  I haven't been greeted at a Wal-Mart in years.  I only go when it's really late and I have no other choice.  There are four Wal-Marts near me, and I've only met two associates worth a damn, and they're students in college.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T10:11:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16002707</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16002707" />
    <title>Comment from Southern on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Southern</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15984204" rel="nofollow">tbax929 is just plain tbax929</a>:</p>
<p>It looks like K-Mart actually was the first *national* retailer to have a plan such as this, although theirs was $5 a month ($15 for a 90-day supply). This was launched in May, 2006.</p>
<p>Wal-Marts offering of the $4/30-day plan was launched in September 2006.</p>
<p>So some smaller retailers (such as Fry's Grocery Stores, which are only in Arizona (which, just FWIW, WAS started by the Fry Brothers in the 1960's, but was sold in 1972 and has been owned by Krogers since 1999. Oh, and one of the founders, Charles Fry, had children who started Fry's Electronics. Just a brief bit of trivia)) may have had a $4 plan long before Wal-Mart (or K-Mart, in this case), K-Mart appears to be the one that first rolled it out to all 50 states -- but of course K-Mart didn't have NEAR the market penetration of Wal-Mart, even in its heyday.</p>
<p>So I believe props would go to K-Mart for a similar plan (albeit only available on 90-day supplies) launching first, but Wal-Mart WAS (apparently) the first national retailer to offer a *30-day* supply of a generic drug for $4.</p>
<p>(Links used to research):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=41309" rel="nofollow">[www.flutrackers.com]</a><br />
<a href="http://diabetes.about.com/b/2006/09/22/walmart-launches-400-generic-drug-program.htm" rel="nofollow">[diabetes.about.com]</a><br />
<a href="http://www.azstarnet.com/business/151991" rel="nofollow">[www.azstarnet.com]</a><br />
<a href="http://www.allbusiness.com/retail-trade/food-stores/4262238-1.html" rel="nofollow">[www.allbusiness.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T09:55:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16002472</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16002472" />
    <title>Comment from jecowa on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>jecowa</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15984011" rel="nofollow">morganlh85</a>:</p>
<p>At Wal*Mart the receipt checkers will write down if you buy an expensive item. (They did it with my Xbox 360 Elite.) Maybe they have some system for the TV scam you described.</p>
<p>I don't understand the razor blade scam. You return the razor you just bought to get store credit, then you go steal a box of razor blades with the receipt razor blade receipt? At Wal*Mart they use a black marker over the items on the receipt that you return.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T09:33:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16002390</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16002390" />
    <title>Comment from IfThenElvis on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>IfThenElvis</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15983212" rel="nofollow">bombhand</a>: Zellers' issue is that employees are not rewarded for helping customers and are not given authority to make decisions. There is no upward mobility in a Zeller's store. Their job is stocking shelves and they better meet their goals by the end of the shift - pausing to help customers just gets in the way.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T09:27:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16002330</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16002330" />
    <title>Comment from IfThenElvis on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>IfThenElvis</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15983212" rel="nofollow">bombhand</a>: I'm surprised at the OP's situation. It is not typical of Walmart - returns are always no questions asked. My wife is the queen of refunds/exchanges and has never had a problem at Walmart. We joke that our Walmart is so busy that it does more in returns than the local Kmart and Target do in sales.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T09:22:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16002265</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16002265" />
    <title>Comment from IfThenElvis on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>IfThenElvis</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>:Fifty cents here and fifty cents there can add up to substantial savings over a week. We have two other grocery chain options (incl. Albertsons who have better meats). We cherry pick but shop mainly at Walmart -and at Albertsons when they have sales.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T09:17:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16001493</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16001493" />
    <title>Comment from coren on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>coren</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>Just throwing it out there, and it may have been said, but all they had to do is grab one off the shelf for comparison's sake (smell and dilution, it's doubtful they're sealed so you'd get a good sense of it I think just opening it)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T08:06:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16001007</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16001007" />
    <title>Comment from MooseOfReason on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>MooseOfReason</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>How do you buy the wrong detergent?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T07:28:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16000962</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16000962" />
    <title>Comment from coraspartan on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>coraspartan</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982468" rel="nofollow">michigan2cv</a>: I love Meijer!  I began to feel guilty about spending what I thought was "so much" at Meijer so I did one of my weekly shopping trips at Walmart; I didn't save any money and hated every second I was in that awful store.</p>
<p>Long live Meijer!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T07:24:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16000457</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16000457" />
    <title>Comment from bobcatred on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>bobcatred</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>: It's not even a matter of money for me. It's a matter of having the items I want and having them in stock. There's only one grocery chain in my area, and because they're the only one, they're lazy. Items never get restocked, and the stockers will just shove any item in a location when they're feeling too lazy to go to the back and get more of the appropriate item, which leads to items disappearing from the store and never being ordered again. Walmart is not my favorite place and I would happily shop elsewhere if they carried everything I want and need, but I refuse to spend $20 in gas driving around to every branch of the same grocery store in hopes that they might have everything I'm looking for. Walmart's not perfect, but I know the regular restocking times, and their stockers are less prone to making things I want and need disappear from the shelves.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T06:49:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16000185</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16000185" />
    <title>Comment from ElizabethD on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>ElizabethD</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>"misery-inducing, wretched customer service experience"</p>
<p>A tad hyperbolic, no?  I'll grant that it was frustrating and inconvenient, though. And yes, insulting.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T06:28:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16000148</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16000148" />
    <title>Comment from ElizabethD on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>ElizabethD</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15994858" rel="nofollow">dahlink_natasha</a>:</p>
<p>I've done that too!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T06:26:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16000141</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16000141" />
    <title>Comment from ElizabethD on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>ElizabethD</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15989356" rel="nofollow">brbubba</a>:</p>
<p>Those warehouse membership places:  We have no storage to speak of in our house.  I cannot possibly buy the quantities you find in BJ's, etc.  Plus, only one kid left at home instead of three. Supersizing just doesn't work for us.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T06:26:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:16000128</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c16000128" />
    <title>Comment from ElizabethD on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>ElizabethD</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15986715" rel="nofollow">thezone</a>:</p>
<p>"My wife recently bought a bunch of stuff there and I promptly returned it all."</p>
<p>Wow. Did she know you were a control freak when you married her?  8-/  My teenaged son reviles WalMart but that doesn't stop me from buying some things there.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T06:25:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15999267</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15999267" />
    <title>Comment from inadequatewife on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>inadequatewife</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15984707" rel="nofollow">Verucalise(countingcalories)</a>: I adore Price Chopper too. The one nearest us just renovated about a year ago and it took me a while to get accustomed to the new layout, but they consistently have a better selection than P&amp;C (our other local, American grocery store).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T05:30:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15999231</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15999231" />
    <title>Comment from LastError on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>LastError</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982107" rel="nofollow">bagumpity</a>: It's not just consumers.</p>
<p>I had a summer job once working in a laundromat where the front counter happily sold detergents and bleach and softener and other stuff.</p>
<p>Small bottle of Clorox was $2.00 I recall.  I didn't think anything of it until saw the owner taking out the trash at night.   He would take out any aluminum cans (makes sense) and also ALL the small Clorox bottles and any fabric softener bottles that he'd sold.</p>
<p>He then proceeded to refill the Clorox bottles with cheap generic bleach and put them right back on the shelf for sale.  He did the same with store brand generic softener standing in for Downy, except he'd water that down too to stretch it even further.</p>
<p>The next day, he'd sell the bottles again, fish them out of the trash again, refill and repeat.</p>
<p>It ended up being a major profit center in that place: selling a few cents worth of bleach for a couple bucks.  Almost pure profit.</p>
<p>Nobody ever complained that the bleach wasn't as good (and it wasn't: this was cheap crap bleach) or that the Downy didn't seem to do a lot.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T05:27:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15999148</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15999148" />
    <title>Comment from inadequatewife on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>inadequatewife</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982003" rel="nofollow">yentaleh</a>: We shop at our small town Zellers all the time for health and beauty aids, toilet paper, pet food, etc... They have some decent prices on grocery items in their weekly ad. Our local store is clean, bright, and the employees are fabulous - much nicer than the people at Walmart across town.</p>
<p>But the Zellers in Ottawa are typically dirty, cluttered, and half the shelves are empty. But then again, the Walmart we go to in Ottawa every once in a while is a nightmare for parking and it's not even a superstore. The Walmart across the border in New York is clean and well organized.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T05:24:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15999088</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15999088" />
    <title>Comment from LastError on 2009-10-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>LastError</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>: For me, it's not the 50 cents (and that's debatable anyway: some of the local grocery stores are less expensive and have far more selection).</p>
<p>The thing with Walmart is that it's ALWAYS open.  I get off work at midnight most nights, because sometimes you have to do those hours to keep the world running.  And right now, it's a job.   So what's open when I get off work?  Walmart.  Not Target.  Not Kmart, nor Sears, Costco, Home Depot, Publix, Ingles, Best Buy, Frys, or any of the stores at the malls.</p>
<p>Just Walmart.  And Kroger.   But if I need anything other than food, Kroger can't help me.  So at midnight when I need food and a shirt and some tools or some oil for my car, or whatever, I end up at Walmart.  Because 1) they have it and 2) they are open when I need it.</p>
<p>If Target was open, that would be awesome.  But they aren't open.</p>
<p>When you think about it, the fact that Walmart IS open 24hours means they automatically have somewhere around twice the trading hours per store compared to nearly anyone else.   They win because everybody else closes at night.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T05:20:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15998737</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15998737" />
    <title>Comment from jayphat on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>jayphat</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c15981871" rel="nofollow">Falcon5768</a>: Sam used to say "why do we treat our customers like criminals when 97% are good?"</p><br />
<p>If only 3% of my customers through the year were a-holes trying to rip me off, I would be happy.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T04:58:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15998425</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15998425" />
    <title>Comment from anithinks on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>anithinks</name>
        <uri>http://cosmos-modicum.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://cosmos-modicum.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15985483" rel="nofollow">harvey_birdman</a>: I'm happy to report that Safeway does. Best customer service ever!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T04:42:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15998366</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15998366" />
    <title>Comment from StanTheManDean on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>StanTheManDean</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>The locally the law enforcement community just busted a counterfeiting ring that was purchasing modest priced products ($20 to $100) from stores with liberal return policies using bogus money, then returning to the store in short periods of time to return the products for cash or gift cards. The gift cards were being sold at a local flea market as well as on ebay etc.</p><br />
<p>Purportedly $33,000 of goods were purchased by the counterfeiting ring before they were caught.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T04:38:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15998326</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15998326" />
    <title>Comment from justagigilo85 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>justagigilo85</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15986158" rel="nofollow">Cyberxion101</a>: Fail is right. I'm failing to see why she even bothered bringing up being pregnant if she didn't want sympathy.</p>
<p>Way to reply my post directly, btw.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T04:36:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15998283</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15998283" />
    <title>Comment from justagigilo85 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>justagigilo85</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15986934" rel="nofollow">floraposte</a>: I'm a CSR myself at a grocery store, and I quickly learned to pick my fights carefully. Though my company does allow us to refuse returns/exchanges without a receipt, I'm not going to fight somebody over a $2 spice jar.</p>
<p>That being said, yeah, I would have given her benefit of the doubt.</p>
<p>Still don't think it was really necessary to pull out the pregnant card.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T04:33:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15997036</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15997036" />
    <title>Comment from saltyoak on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>saltyoak</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>How do you lose money if you put the returns back on the shelf for resale?  The last time I looked at their shoes I found a pair that had been WORN, on the shelf.  Also the Leggs pantyhose are not the same as what you find at Krogers. Same box half the price half the quality!  Dog food from China anyone?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T03:28:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15996895</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15996895" />
    <title>Comment from thisistobehelpful on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>thisistobehelpful</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>: Because it's not just 50 cents on a jar of pickles. Sometimes it's close to half the price for a lot of necessities like milk, eggs and bread. That translates to getting twice the food at the same price and that matters a lot when you're poor.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T03:22:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15996571</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15996571" />
    <title>Comment from mythago on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>mythago</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return?#c15988660" rel="nofollow">bobateaforyouandme</a>: You're the one who got married, you're the one whose spouse decided to drive a car, you're the one who was so bad at your job you got laid off, blah blah blah.</p><br />
<p>Oh, I forgot. Victim-blaming is only fun when you do it to <i>other people</i>.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T03:09:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15996475</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15996475" />
    <title>Comment from catastrophegirl on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>catastrophegirl</name>
        <uri>http://www.catastrophegirl.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.catastrophegirl.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15984011" rel="nofollow">morganlh85</a>: oh i worked at an import store where a manager at a different location in the chain made a poor store layout choice - two people walk in the door, one down low.</p>
<p>the cashier can only see the one standing over the height of the counter and the furniture displays.</p>
<p>the one on the floor grabs a $900 oriental carpet that is rolled up in a stack by the door and, crawling, hauls it back out while the person standing in the doorway distracts the cashier with something like "is there a payphone?" or "can i use your bathroom?"</p>
<p>2 minutes later someone drags in a $900 oriental rug and says "i lost the receipt, can i get store credit? [which i will then spend on small decorative items that will be easy to sell at my booth at the flea market on saturday?]"</p>
<p>ballsy. and the store was down 6 rugs in two months before they caught on to how it was happening.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T03:05:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15996258</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15996258" />
    <title>Comment from catastrophegirl on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>catastrophegirl</name>
        <uri>http://www.catastrophegirl.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.catastrophegirl.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15991036" rel="nofollow">LadyTL</a>: if you've never checked out a bj's wholesale club and have the option to do so, it might be worth your while to check it out. unlike sams they don't ID you at the door [the two i have been to] and you can just go look around and price compare.</p>
<p>bj's sells a lot of products in smaller packages than the other two - i have sams and my sister and i split bj's and costco so i can compare all three.</p>
<p>if you have pets - a wholesale club annual membership for me pays for itself in two 50 pound bags of purina dog chow for $22 each. grocery store: $15 for 20 pounds.</p>
<p>i know it's not for everyone and it can get very expensive if they don't have the products you already use. but like i said, bjs at least you can check out the selection before making the decision to become a member and see if it would benefit you.</p>
<p>*speaking as someone who resisted the wholesale club mentality for years</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T02:56:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15996058</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15996058" />
    <title>Comment from catastrophegirl on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>catastrophegirl</name>
        <uri>http://www.catastrophegirl.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.catastrophegirl.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15989356" rel="nofollow">brbubba</a>: the funny part of your statement is that sam's kinda IS walmart - same company. but yeah, i go for sam's or bj's first when i can - but the hours aren't always convenient for me. sometimes i need something at 1:00 am and walmart is my only option</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T02:49:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15995955</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15995955" />
    <title>Comment from econobiker on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>econobiker</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>In the past alot of people without receipts were returning the items which were bought via a upc label scam- put a fake low priced upc label over the correct one on a high value item and then return for the high value credit on a gift card which could be resold for more cash. (This was also how an infamous Star Wars collector was ripping off high dollar Star Wars toys to sell on his website.)</p><br />
<p>I've also related on Consumerist before how my ex-wif's dim-witted but ultra-honest female cousin thought she would be accused of fraud when returning a sewing machine whose box had been filled with bricks.</p><br />
<p>When my 2nd wife and I bought the cheapest a/c unit Walmart had in 2008 (as a stop gap while our apt a/c was fixed) some interesting things happened. First the units were all plastic banded on the exterior probably to discourage return theft. Second: the individual serial number (printed on a label on the box exterior) had to be recorded by the cashier. I am guessing this was so that there would be record of us purchasing it and returning it if the box was returned as empty and found as fraud attempt either by us or a later purchaser.</p><br />
<p>As for returns, I have been behind a thug appearing guy who was trying to return several unused spools of high-dollar speaker wire without a receipt and with a completely bogus story about how he had "just" bought the wire at another regional Walmart about two hours before. He got shot down when the return person called that store to ask them to check their inventory for that sku sales and the other store had none sold that day. By the time his attempt was winding down, the clerk had also figured out that he was on Walmart's "frequent returner" profile so he couldn't even have gotten the speaker wire returned anyhow. I began to start coughing, stretching, and then talking to someone else about "returning a purchase without a receipt" to help the guy to understand that other people with legit returns were waiting (myself and three others) so he finally gave up and left. Big scamming dummy...</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T02:45:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15995878</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15995878" />
    <title>Comment from stormbird on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>stormbird</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Last week a guy walked out with $200,000 in cash from a WalMart. This week they harass a woman over possibly watered down laundry detergent.</p>
<p>(breaks out an abacus, tallies things for a moment)</p>
<p>No, it doesn't add up.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T02:42:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15994858</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15994858" />
    <title>Comment from dahlink_natasha on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>dahlink_natasha</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return?t=15981957#c15991036" rel="nofollow">LadyTL</a>: especially if you live by yourself, all of that stuff spoils before you get to eat it all. I'll never forget when I brought home $40 worth of produce (cantalopes, tomatoes, peaches, etc) from the farmer's market and it all spoiled within about 2 days of my bringing it home...and yes, that was with me sticking it in the fridge.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T02:07:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15993985</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15993985" />
    <title>Comment from 89macrunner on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>89macrunner</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>walmart should be smarter than to argue with customers over returns under $10...its not worth their time in the long run for cost and customer</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T01:37:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15993255</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15993255" />
    <title>Comment from SgtMajorFragg on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>SgtMajorFragg</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I bought a gas smoker at a Wal-Mart just before the Super Bowl last year. It was already assembled and was the only one on the display floor.</p>
<p>The smoker had problems with the venturi (the mechanism that forces the gas from the bottle to the burner). When I went to check on my ribs, the fire didn't seem to be burning so I hit the starter. All of the gas in the smoker box ignited, resulting in singed eyebrows and lots of laughter from my friends.</p>
<p>When I returned it the next day - they grilled me with all sorts of questions as to why I was returning it - never mind that I told them it was improperly built and a potential explosive device.</p>
<p>I finally got my money back, but not without enduring the sighs and whines from people waiting to return their Snuggies and Oxy-Clean.</p>
<p>I still shop at Wal-Mart, but only to buy food that is marked up 20% or more at the regular grocery stores (Albertsons, Publix and Sweetbay).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T01:12:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15992438</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15992438" />
    <title>Comment from ecwis on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>ecwis</name>
        <uri>http://n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981871" rel="nofollow">Falcon5768</a>: This is a false generalization.  I have been happy with Walmart's return policy.  They always let me return items without receipts and sometimes even give me cash back.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T00:47:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15992394</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15992394" />
    <title>Comment from UniComp on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>UniComp</name>
        <uri>http://www.soundlog.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.soundlog.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>Since when did people equate the lowest prices with the best customer service? STOP shopping at Wal-Mart</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T00:46:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15992370</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15992370" />
    <title>Comment from haoshufu on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>haoshufu</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>does not matter. as long as they are still selling on the cheap, people will keep going back.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T00:45:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15992365</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15992365" />
    <title>Comment from RedCatLinux on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>RedCatLinux</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return?skyline=true&amp;s=x#c15983859" rel="nofollow">AirIntake</a>: What was I thinking? The last time I made a quarter free and clear I had walked into a casino, picked up the coin on the ground and walked out.</p><br />
<p>I wound up scrapping the whole idea of counting my own coinage and the quarter went towards the cost of running my bucket of spare change through the supermarket Coinstar machine.</p><br />
<p>I always kinda turned up my nose at those things, but the convenience is worth the quarter someone else paid.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T00:45:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15991890</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15991890" />
    <title>Comment from ShadowFalls on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>ShadowFalls</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15983312" rel="nofollow">squinko - is pretending there's a star</a>:</p>
<p>They did it first here as hell. Everyone else including the small places didn't do it until they did. The general nationwide pharmacies didn't bother doing it at all...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T00:30:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15991289</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15991289" />
    <title>Comment from pot_roast on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>pot_roast</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15985328" rel="nofollow">holytrainwreck</a>: Since she's willing to whip out the "I'm pregnant and don't deserve this because I'm PREGNANT" card, who knows how rude and uncooperative she was to the Wal-Mart staff. Since, y'know, we're only getting her side of things and they just happen to fit in with the status quo. From the letter: "...suffer through that indignity.."</p><br />
<p>Yes, because standing in line for 10 minutes is such horrible suffering. Nevermind that she got what she came for. Being asked to complete her shopping before doing the exchange was also an unbearable act of cruelty too, it seems.</p><br />
<p><a href="http://www.garfunkelandoates.com/music/clips/7/pregnant-women-are-smug/" rel="nofollow">[www.garfunkelandoates.com]</a></p><br />
<p>Ah, a classic.</p><br />
<p>But really, this is a complete non-story.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T00:09:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15991103</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15991103" />
    <title>Comment from LadyTL on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>LadyTL</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c15989356" rel="nofollow">brbubba</a>: Oh and farmers markets tend to be (at least in my area) a bit more epensive than the supermarket as well as the fact that making your own food has hidden costs in time and the cost of the materials so it costs the same as processed food in the end if you don't have the time.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T00:02:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15991036</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15991036" />
    <title>Comment from LadyTL on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>LadyTL</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c15989356" rel="nofollow">brbubba</a>: yes well not everyone has the money to pay the membership fees or the high cost of bulk food. Yes their prices are lower per individual serving but they dont Sell them by individual serving so it can get very expensive.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-14T00:00:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15990972</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15990972" />
    <title>Comment from Gracegottcha on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Gracegottcha</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've had trouble returning ANYTHING to WalMart.  We moved earlier this year to a new house.  We needed all kinds of little things like curtains, rugs, towels, cleaning supplies, hardware, etc., not to mention everyday things like food and such.  We moved to a very small town, smack dab in the middle of two Walmart stores, who have apparently run all of their competition out so there are no hardware stores or grocery stores nearby.  We bought several hundred dollars' worth of goods over the first two weeks or so.  There were probably five times that I needed to return something or exchange it, and every single time I had problems even with the receipt in hand.  Walmart even went so far as to tell me point blank that I had better be sure of my purchases before buying them because I would not be allowed to return or exchange them.  Apparently, they use some sort of list that uses your driver's license to mark you as a "habitual returner" if you return more than twice within a certain period of time.  Every one of the five items returned was in its original packaging, had never been opened, and was paid for with cash (as per the receipt).</p>
<p>Yes, I made a huge deal about it because they were essentially calling me a cheat.  I no longer shop at Walmart - any Walmart.  I have to go way out of my way not to, but I'd sure rather give my money to a store that is grateful for my business.  I may even pay a little more sometimes, but NO MORE WALMART!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T23:58:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15990828</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15990828" />
    <title>Comment from Optimus on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Optimus</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981871" rel="nofollow">Falcon5768</a>: As many problems as people in "the South" have, one that is avoided here in Alabama is knowledge of one's rights. Walmart doesn't check receipts here, or at least I haven't had them check in a long time.</p>
<p>Of course, everyone and their child having a concealed carry permit may influence that somewhat, as well.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T23:54:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15990705</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15990705" />
    <title>Comment from mralmostpopuarl on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>mralmostpopuarl</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15983862" rel="nofollow">MrPenny</a>: Ahaha! 10 point to you sir.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T23:50:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15990160</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15990160" />
    <title>Comment from giggitygoo on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>giggitygoo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982740" rel="nofollow">squinko - is pretending there's a star</a>:</p>
<p>I'd be interested in hearing who originated it, since the news stories I've seen covered it as an offer that Walmart started. Though even if they weren't the first, they did spread it nationwide and forced other nationwide chains like Target to match them. (Competition is a great thing) So if nothing else they enabled many more people to get the medicines they need that they otherwise might not be able to afford. Yet some just can't let a positive comment about Walmart go by without pointing out some unrelated negative.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T23:33:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15989957</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15989957" />
    <title>Comment from weens33 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>weens33</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I make it a point to keep my money local so I did away with trips to walmart years ago.  I went into one a few months back and was so surprised to see that they are so full of crap.  Their merchandise isn't any cheaper than what I get at my local supermarket.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T23:26:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15989716</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15989716" />
    <title>Comment from ToddMU03 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>ToddMU03</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Pregnancy shouldn't even be brought up in this case since it had no real bearing on the issue. Just saying.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T23:17:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15989642</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15989642" />
    <title>Comment from dluna33 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>dluna33</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I can't remember the last time I've gone to Wal-Mart. There's a Target and a grocery store very close to my house and I just go there. Something things might be just a tad more but saving $5 is no big deal to me. Detergent I'll pick up at the dollar store.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T23:15:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15989636</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15989636" />
    <title>Comment from TruthHog on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>TruthHog</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Apparently there is a difference between top-loader laundry detergent and side-loaded laundry detergent. Who knew? Not me. But twice my loving wife has noted that I brought home from WM the wrong $14 jug o' Tide, and twice I have gone back to return/exchange, and twice it was a piece of cake. And never again do I get the wrong detergent.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T23:15:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15989624</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15989624" />
    <title>Comment from Elginista on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Elginista</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982468" rel="nofollow">michigan2cv</a>: I do love my Meijer.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T23:14:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15989455</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15989455" />
    <title>Comment from changed my name on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>changed my name</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982292" rel="nofollow">ZoeSchizzel</a>:  Show me a store where there are no crying kids, and I'll guarantee you that there is a reason (hint: Publix is overpriced).  If you want to pay more for the same thing just to avoid some noise (James Taylor?  eww) that's your choice.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T23:09:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15989429</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15989429" />
    <title>Comment from The Marionette on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>The Marionette</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>I didn't have a problem with detergent, but I did have one with exchanging some shoes.</p>
<p>*lights up tobacco pipe*</p>
<p>It was on a saturday about a month 1/2 ago, I bought a new pair of shoes for work (dress-type shoes/boots), I tried them on, they seemed fine and bought them.  I only had work one day and was off for 3, but I happen to be doing some walking around in those shoes and the back ankle part of the shoe was rubbing against my ankle a lot, eventually it blistered up very badly where i had to limp.</p>
<p>I didn't have my receipt, but I did have proof on my debit card's site that I had bought them.  Just as a precaution I called the store, immediately asked for a manager.  I don't remember the manager's name, but I asked if I could exchange the shoes without a receipt and he said no if it was with cash, but if it was with credit or debit they would be able to cross reference it if i knew when i bought them (which luckily i did).  Also on their site it says:</p>
<p>"Wal-Mart, for several years, has accepted returns without a receipt, even though many of our competitors require receipts for all returns. Wal-Mart gives customers the option of a cash refund (if the purchase was under $25), a shopping card for the amount of the purchase (if it was over $25), a credit to the customer's credit card or an even exchange for the product. Also, as applicable, we follow any manufacturer's warranties."</p>
<p>The shoes were $20...  Anyways, I get to the store later and tell the woman there at customer service about the whole thing and she said they don't do cross references with small purchases, that's for electronics and major purchases.  I'm like "Well, apparently you don't have real managers answer the phone either because I spoke to a manager".  Eventually another manager let me exchange them, but of course not without a headache.</p>
<p>If one thing pisses me off it's when a simple process takes painfully long because some jackass wants to try to dispute your argument.  I have to deal with manatees at the theater all the time but I always give returns/exchanges if I see it fit, even at times when I know damn well they're lying (the guy who found a long blonde hair in his popcorn and all of us working there have black hair...the guy has blonde hair.....).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T23:08:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15989356</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15989356" />
    <title>Comment from brbubba on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>brbubba</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>: <br />
I can understand the logic behind some of these responses, but if you actually make a list and price out each option Walmart is not always the cheapest. And if you are really looking to save money you should be shopping at one of the membership places, Sam's, Costco, BJ's, etc. Walmart can't even touch their prices. Also there are other ways to save on food, stop eating processed food and go to your local farmers market!!!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T23:06:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15989325</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15989325" />
    <title>Comment from PermanentStar on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>PermanentStar</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15982468" rel="nofollow">michigan2cv</a>: I love Meijer. I am originally from Michigan and live in Virginia, and I miss Meijer terribly.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T23:05:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15989311</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15989311" />
    <title>Comment from enine on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>enine</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return?t=15981957#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>: Not even that, I find that while you may be able to occisionally save 50 cents on a brand name of pickles the store brand of pickles at another store will be even cheaper, so I never saw a savings buying at walmart.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T23:05:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15989224</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15989224" />
    <title>Comment from Urgleglurk on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Urgleglurk</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I still won't shop at a store that assumes that every customer is a criminal until proven otherwise. They can go Cheney themselves.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T23:02:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15988896</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15988896" />
    <title>Comment from floraposte on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>floraposte</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15988808" rel="nofollow">yevarechecha</a>: You should see modern clubwear.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:52:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15988808</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15988808" />
    <title>Comment from yevarechecha on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>yevarechecha</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15983092" rel="nofollow">pxf9641</a>: How are some of the people in those photos not arrested for indecent exposure? Skimpy tops and short shorts are one thing, but I didn't know it was legal to walk around in public with your entire giant asscrack in full view of everyone. Or put your boobs in a little hammock and claim you're wearing a shirt. That's disgusting.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:50:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15988660</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15988660" />
    <title>Comment from bobateaforyouandme on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>bobateaforyouandme</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15986490" rel="nofollow">Outrun1986</a>: Thank you!  I'm not going to lose my job by not following corporate policy because it inconveniences you.  <br />
And, oh no, waiting ten minutes in line is a travesty.  I hate the pregnant card, the "I live 45 minutes away" card, the "this is the fifth store I've been to for this item" card, all those stupid excuses.  You're the one who wanted a child, you're the one who chose to live out in the sticks, and you're the one without the common sense to call a store to make sure they have an item before driving across town.  It's not my fault and I don't care.  I'd rather have people with real problems like "my spouse died in a car accident" or "I was laid off yesterday".  Those are actual problems.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:45:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15988636</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15988636" />
    <title>Comment from elangomatt on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>elangomatt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982107" rel="nofollow">bagumpity</a>: I can very easily say that yes, they will try about anything to scam money returning items. At the retail store I used to work at, customer service was required to open returned cans of paint because people had taken to returning cans of water saying that they didn't like the color of the paint or that the person mixed it wrong.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:44:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15988418</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15988418" />
    <title>Comment from Karita on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Karita</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15987130" rel="nofollow">thezone</a>: Well, the place where I worked did honor the guarantee. But I, personally, think there is a line. It's a line of my own creation, yes, but I won't cross it. We all make our own judgment calls in situations like that, and my judgment is different from the judgment of others.</p>
<p>Obviously the company that instituted that policy hasn't drawn a line, but still, I'm not going to return something that wore out after more than a reasonable amount of time, or that was ruined because of something I did. In my personal view, that's stealing, and I won't do it. I don't want to contribute to a company changing their rules after being taken advantage of.</p>
<p>I'm not going to condemn someone for doing what they are within their rights to do, but I did hate seeing people (in my opinion) abuse the policy, and I did not enjoy processing those transactions. But, I also did not refuse to process them, and I was always polite.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:36:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15988327</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15988327" />
    <title>Comment from mariospants on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>mariospants</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Just another reason why you'll never see me in the background of one the  "people of walmart" blog entries...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:34:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15988278</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15988278" />
    <title>Comment from bobateaforyouandme on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>bobateaforyouandme</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982655" rel="nofollow">burnedout</a>: And "mysteriously dropped in price" probably means that you paid for the item with cash, lost the receipt, then decided to return it after a longer period of time.  When an item goes on clearance, yep, that's the price you're gonna get for it.  How could Target know that you paid full-price when you don't have a receipt?  Stop complaining and save your receipts already.  It's not hard to drop them in a bag/folder/drawer.  Oh, the effort!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:32:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15988276</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15988276" />
    <title>Comment from consumerwise on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>consumerwise</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wal-Mart attracts the lowest common denominator of trashy people, many of whom are freeloaders, shoplifters, and other thieves. As a result of their primary customer base, Wal-Mart treats all of its customers like scum and thieves.</p>
<p>Just another reason why I refuse to shop at Wal-Mart.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:32:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15988206</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15988206" />
    <title>Comment from MsEllenT on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>MsEllenT</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15982171" rel="nofollow">K-Bo</a>: That's funny; here in Nova Scotia, Canada, cat litter at Walmart is actually more expensive than the grocery stores. Even many paper products are more expensive at our Walmarts. It actually saves us money to avoid Wally's World.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:30:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15988182</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15988182" />
    <title>Comment from AirIntake on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>AirIntake</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15986288" rel="nofollow">Cyberxion101</a>: That's what I tell pregnant women who try to use the pregnant card.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:29:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15988177</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15988177" />
    <title>Comment from bobateaforyouandme on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>bobateaforyouandme</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982655" rel="nofollow">burnedout</a>: You have 90 days to return an item.  Seriously?  It took 3 months to get to your house?  Those must have been awesome pillowcases to wait that long for them.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:29:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15988090</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15988090" />
    <title>Comment from Stephmo on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Stephmo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982107" rel="nofollow">bagumpity</a>: Who knows anymore?  People have scammed bottle return receipts.  I'll print out internet coupons and I separate them from regular because I noticed that the clerks at my grocery store looked at them differently - I finally asked why.  They're looking for repeating barcodes because people take the time to PHOTOCOPY additional $1/off coupons.  Remember that your self-checkout monitor folks aren't really there to help you - they're there to ensure that you're not pulling barcode scams or slipping goods past the belts and weight sensors.  We've seen people wheel entire carts of groceries out of the store without going through checkout (I'm waiting for the ban on using your own eco-friendly bags - this was part of what we saw).</p>
<p>I forget where I read it, but between regular shoplifting, swapping out bar-codes, return for credit scams and all other manner costs US grocers 40 billion a year.  This was data that was at least 2 years old - so who knows how enterprising these folks are getting?  This 40 billion gets passed onto us as consumers - but we're all saying now that we can't afford it, so stores are trying to stop it.  It's lose-lose.</p>
<p>Frankly, the fact that she was willing to stick to her guns is what probably convinced them it wasn't a scam.  If Wal-Mart were smart, they'd pressure the detergent folks into putting a plastic seal-ring on detergents so folks could prove they hadn't opened the item.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:26:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15988027</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15988027" />
    <title>Comment from bobateaforyouandme on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>bobateaforyouandme</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982107" rel="nofollow">bagumpity</a>: Oh yeah.  I work at the service desk at a similar large company and there are all sorts of things you have to watch out for.  Open every box to make sure they didn't substitute bricks/juices/or old electronics.  Double check the clothing to make sure the price tag and the tag on the clothing are the same brand (same for shoes), check model numbers, etc. etc.  And, contrary to what gets yelled at me, our return policy IS better than Wal-Mart's.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:24:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15987972</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15987972" />
    <title>Comment from mythago on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>mythago</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15982292" rel="nofollow">ZoeSchizzel</a>: On the other hand, twits like you don't shop at Walmart. So it has <i>something</i> going for it.</p><br />
<p>That said, not everybody is a spoiled urbanista who can go to Publix or Whole Foods or even a Target Superstore for everyday needs. If your choices were between Walmart and a tiny IGA where the prices were twice as much, and you didn't have so much money that you wiped your ass with it, you might think twice about Walmart.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:22:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15987832</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15987832" />
    <title>Comment from mythago on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>mythago</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15987604" rel="nofollow">FrugalFreak</a>: Exactly. Mr. Otto must not know what it is like to live somewhere that doesn't have 2,492,394 retail outlets competing for your money.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:17:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15987824</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15987824" />
    <title>Comment from jonroknrol on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>jonroknrol</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>But the real question...Is Wal-Mart taking this seriously?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:17:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15987707</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15987707" />
    <title>Comment from dragonfire81 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>dragonfire81</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15986973" rel="nofollow">mmmsoap</a>: They didn't believe her when she said the liquid had been replaced/watered down, they were implying she had used some of contents and then brought it back for a refund after the fact. Sounds to me like they are implying she is a thief.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:14:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15987628</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15987628" />
    <title>Comment from mackjaz on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>mackjaz</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981839" rel="nofollow">I_Elohel</a>: Not me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:11:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15987604</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15987604" />
    <title>Comment from FrugalFreak on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>FrugalFreak</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>:</p>
<p>Here we have Walmart and Winn-Dixie. Thats the only choice and Winn Dixie is $$$$$$ to me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:10:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15987601</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15987601" />
    <title>Comment from lubap on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>lubap</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982403" rel="nofollow">gparlett</a>: Walmart is fairly new to SE Michigan, and other chains have had those discount prescriptions for quite a while.  I've always told my uninsured patients to go to Costco--you don't need to be a customer to use their pharmacy, and their prices are the best.  I've found that prescription antibiotics and other meds can be half the price of other pharmacies.  Since they only charge a certain percentage over cost, they almost invariably have the best prices around.</p>
<p>Other pharmacies like to push generics, because the drugs are very cheap and they can really mark them up and still have them be cheaper than the name brand.  Their profit margin can be astronomical.  Costco will give you a really good deal, particularly if you buy a year's supply at a time; with many of the cheaper drugs, this can turn out to be only a few dollars more than a month's supply (because of the dispensing fee).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:10:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15987598</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15987598" />
    <title>Comment from varial on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>varial</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I am proud to say I have not shopped at WalMart for over a year. I started shopping at local grocery stores and will stop at Kmart and/or Target when I need something other than grocery. It's a little more work, but you CAN keep the costs down and come in very close to WalMart's prices if you really want to. And it's oh-so worth it in the end.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T22:10:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15987279</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15987279" />
    <title>Comment from calquist on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>calquist</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982107" rel="nofollow">bagumpity</a>: Detergent is expensive if you buy a big bottle (which most families would use) it could be like $10 - $15. And I'm sure they shop for food every week. I'm not saying that it is right, but I could see it happening a lot.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:59:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15987130</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15987130" />
    <title>Comment from thezone on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>thezone</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15983774" rel="nofollow">Karita</a>: @<a href="#c15983257" rel="nofollow">floraposte</a>: I think Floraposte is right. If a company is willing to say lifetime guarantee then they should always take the item back. My friend had a pair of shoe (Bass I want to say) and sent them back after about 10 years and they happily gave him a new pair. He convinced me and many others to buy from them. So I don't think its unfair for a person to do it. In fact I'm sure the company loves the few people that do because they know they will have a customer for life.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:54:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15986973</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15986973" />
    <title>Comment from thezone on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>thezone</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982696" rel="nofollow">K-Bo</a>: Just because you've had worse treatment doesn't mean you should condone or trivialize the treatment of someone else. That's like one person saying they were roughed up by a bully and someone else saying they shouldn't complain cause they were sent to the hospital by the same person.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:48:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15986934</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15986934" />
    <title>Comment from floraposte on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>floraposte</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15985868" rel="nofollow">justagigilo85</a>: Maybe it was the staff's half-day off.</p>
<p>Seriously, I don't think it's a loss to society if we grant people a certain amount of slack for physically difficult situations, whether they're temporary or not, self-inflicted or not.  People with injuries often did something stupid to result in that condition, but I don't think it's appropriate to differentiate between kinds of broken legs or causes of emphysema for the purposes of extending some kindness to them.</p>
<p>She didn't say she deserved more than other people, she just mentioned it. And presumably you agree with her point that Wal-Mart should have honored its return policy, right?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:47:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15986799</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15986799" />
    <title>Comment from Outrun1986 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Outrun1986</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982292" rel="nofollow">ZoeSchizzel</a>: Where I live the demographic that shops at Walmart is the same demographic that shops everywhere else.  The same people who shop at Wegmans shop at Walmart.  If you hate crying kids that much, get an MP3 player, walkman, FM radio or some other audio source and a pair of noise cancelling headphones, your going to see crying kids and babies everywhere at least here, because kids will be kids.</p>
<p>My Walmart is newly built so it is clean but I would rather shop there than at the dirty, unorganized and overpriced Kmart that is down the street.</p>
<p>If you really want me to nitpick here Kmart's employees are about 3 steps down from Walmart's. Not only is the store dirty, unorganized and overpriced (and has outdated food products) but the employees look horrid with their not-so-white white shirts.  They look more like they just rolled out of a giant dust pile..  They also have the nerve to keep only ONE register open most of the time, leading to huge lineups, another reason why I try to avoid shopping there, its just not convienient.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:42:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15986715</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15986715" />
    <title>Comment from thezone on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>thezone</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982291" rel="nofollow">gparlett</a>: I totally understand everyone who chooses to shop there. I refuse to do business with them. My wife recently bought a bunch of stuff there and I promptly returned it all. In my opinion Walmart is what is wrong with corporations. They get their savings on the backs of their employees. I would rather go without than buy anything from them.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:40:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15986592</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15986592" />
    <title>Comment from Gtmac on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Gtmac</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982792" rel="nofollow">Candle.Jack</a>: That should only be the case if WalMart actually suggests or outright says that the trade off for the lower prices is lower levels of service.  This should not be something someone should just take for granted.</p>
<p>In fact WalMart consistently uses their own employees in their commercials to demonstrate how happy and, more importantly, helpful they are.</p>
<p>If thye advertise lower prices and helpful service and don't provide both, anyone would be within their rights to be upset even if it is a commonly held observation that the helpful service is only a fabrication.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:37:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15986490</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15986490" />
    <title>Comment from Outrun1986 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Outrun1986</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15985649" rel="nofollow">floraposte</a>: Yeah I agree, its rare to run into retail rudeness from employees around here, now rudeness from other customers in the store, that is another story!  Unfortunately the retail store cannot control what the other customers do so that is in no way the fault of the store.</p>
<p>You cannot expect retail employees who have had 2-3 hours of training or less and who are given no authority whatsoever to have any clue. The corporation simply doesn't give them the tools needed to do the job properly and to provide good service or they don't allow it.</p>
<p>If there is any flaw, its a flaw in how the corporations are run and corporate policies and perhaps bad individual store management who's attitude trickles down to the floor employees that the customer has interaction with.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:34:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15986288</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15986288" />
    <title>Comment from Cyberxion101 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cyberxion101</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15983895" rel="nofollow">AirIntake</a>: Because you're a douche-bag when you're drunk. Also, while nobody has had the heart to tell you before, you smell like you haven't showered in decades. Get off the sauce and get your shit together already.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:27:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15986262</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15986262" />
    <title>Comment from Outrun1986 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Outrun1986</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982180" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: Couldn't they have just poured a little out of the bottle to see if it was unusually thin or watery, this seems really stupid.  Laundry detergent is usually really thick so I don't see how it would be difficult to tell water from laundry detergent even if it was detergent mixed with water.</p>
<p>The bottle of detergent probably only cost a couple of bucks, definitely less than $10, you would think for the small amount it cost that they would just take the return and eat the cost even if it was water in order to avoid the bad publicity. Its not like we are talking something of huge value here.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:27:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15986243</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15986243" />
    <title>Comment from Cyberxion101 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cyberxion101</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15982709" rel="nofollow">RedCatLinux</a>: This is what I've been trying ineffectually to articulate for the last twenty minutes. I just tend to get hung up on how utterly clueless some of the folks around here can be, that I quickly lose sight of the relevant points.</p><br />
<p>Anyway, well said. ïŠ</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:26:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15986158</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15986158" />
    <title>Comment from Cyberxion101 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cyberxion101</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15983660" rel="nofollow">justagigilo85</a>: Except that not only did she mention her pregnancy well after she had already established her complaint, but she followed that brief mention by saying that nobody should be treated the way that she was, pregnant or not.</p><br />
<p>So hey, comprehension fail.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:24:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15986134</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15986134" />
    <title>Comment from AdvocatesDevil on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>AdvocatesDevil</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15984027" rel="nofollow">tbax929 is just plain tbax929</a>: Yep, Wal*Mart used to be AWESOME about returns but a few bad eggs ruined it for everyone.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:23:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15986133</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15986133" />
    <title>Comment from smiling1809 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>smiling1809</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Yikes. This remind me of the time I went to Target to get my thyroid meds and the lady said I already picked it up and treated me like I was a drug seeker. It was so incredibly embarassing. It was thyroid medication that cost $5.00 for Pete's sake, not Vicodin.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:23:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985868</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985868" />
    <title>Comment from justagigilo85 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>justagigilo85</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15984996" rel="nofollow">Verucalise(countingcalories)</a>: bullshit, bullshit and more bullshit.</p>
<p>Does anybody ever really want bullshit? Do you or anyone you know, pregnant or not, go to walmart with a hankering for some bullshit? You don't, and I don't.</p>
<p>If she seriously didn't want any sympathy points, why on earth would she mention that she's pregnant? On some days, my back is killing me. That doesn't speed up customer service and on the worse days, I won't even leave my house. I don't bother mentioning it to a customer serivce clerk... ever. I work in customer service and I could tell you right now, I don't have sympathy no matter regardless of side.</p>
<p>Regardless, I'd be pissed if I had to wait online for 2 hours if I was in perfect health, pregnant, quadriplegic, retarded, etc.</p>
<p>I'm not trying to write off being pregnant. I'm just saying that there's a decision that's made to have kids, and that involves being pregnant, miserable, in pain, etc. That's a choice made by both that woman and her husband. If she really felt like shit, she could have sent someone else to get it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:14:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985695</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985695" />
    <title>Comment from all4jcvette on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>all4jcvette</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I've been shopping at my local Walmart for years, and never had one problem with a return. I've always been treated with respect. I have had problems at Best Buy and several other stores that are always on consumerist, but never at Walmart. However, had I been treated like that, I too would not continue to shop with them.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:08:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985649</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985649" />
    <title>Comment from floraposte on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>floraposte</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15985483" rel="nofollow">harvey_birdman</a>: Maybe it's a regional thing, or we're talking about different treatments (I don't care about interest in me personally--I'd just as soon they weren't--I just want to be treated politely). It's pretty rare for me to run into genuine retail rudeness around town; the flaw is more often nice-but-clueless.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:07:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985622</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985622" />
    <title>Comment from morlo on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>morlo</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15984128" rel="nofollow">jade1981</a>: Retailers need to support internet piracy so that people don't try to rent for free from them.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:06:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985607</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985607" />
    <title>Comment from holytrainwreck on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>holytrainwreck</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c15982416" rel="nofollow">pgh9fan1</a>: 'I'm 9 months pregnant and to make anyone suffer through that indignity is just plain wrong - regardless if they are pregnant or not!'</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:05:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985565</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985565" />
    <title>Comment from yentaleh on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>yentaleh</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15983212" rel="nofollow">bombhand</a>:</p>
<p>I'm in Vancouver, and I would agree with you on some of what you say. I don't like the Zellers in city and travel outside of Vancouver to shop at the one in Abbotsford. The staff are knowledgeable, its clean and its close to the border, and as for returns I have never had a problem. I only shop at Zellers though when I'm low on cash and I need groceries, or other everyday items. Mostly I just stick with Home Hardware, Save-On and The Bay for items when I'm having a good month financially.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:04:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985520</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985520" />
    <title>Comment from holytrainwreck on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>holytrainwreck</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c15982416" rel="nofollow">pgh9fan1</a>: If you read the letter carefully she doesn't play the preggo card; she indicated that the treatment was dispicable no matter if one's pregnant or not.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:02:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985483</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985483" />
    <title>Comment from harvey_birdman on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>harvey_birdman</name>
        <uri>http://www.duckweedmafia.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.duckweedmafia.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15982320" rel="nofollow">coss3n</a>: Which retail stores treat you like a human being? I've yet to discover such a magical place.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:01:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985463</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985463" />
    <title>Comment from morlo on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>morlo</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982995" rel="nofollow">captadam</a>: Obviously detergent needs a "safety seal". Actually a good idea, because loose caps sometimes leak.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T21:00:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985383</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985383" />
    <title>Comment from holytrainwreck on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>holytrainwreck</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c15982577" rel="nofollow">Luna1375</a>: Class is as class does. If the shoe fits, wear it.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:58:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985328</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985328" />
    <title>Comment from holytrainwreck on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>holytrainwreck</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c15982227" rel="nofollow">pot_roast</a>: Are you kidding me? You have the temerity to blame the victim after reading her letter? You spoolhead.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:56:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985327</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985327" />
    <title>Comment from tackett on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>tackett</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982180" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: <br />
OK, then Walmart needs to change the return policy.</p>
<p>They are allowed to have a NO RETURNS EVER policy, as long as they display it. When they have a policy that says "90 days returns on anything" and they *don't honor* it, there's a problem.</p>
<p>The shopper was following the rules.<br />
Walmart wasn't.</p>
<p>End of story.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:56:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985246</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985246" />
    <title>Comment from mmmsoap on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>mmmsoap</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982502" rel="nofollow">Saboth</a>: I think there's a difference between "I'm sorry, this doesn't meet our return policy," and "You are a thief."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:54:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985233</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985233" />
    <title>Comment from veg-o-matic on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>veg-o-matic</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15984369" rel="nofollow">SabreDC</a>: @<a href="#c15982583" rel="nofollow">Smashville_is a statue of limitations</a>: This question has been addressed before, you know...</p>
<p>As someone explained it in a post I can't find, at least part of the logic behind this is that if a company finds themselves mentioned in a story like this, they're more likely to (say they're) improving customer service across the board and not just at one store in particular.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:53:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985199</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985199" />
    <title>Comment from P=mv on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>P=mv</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981871" rel="nofollow">Falcon5768</a>: I have had limited experience with Walmart's return service. However, when I returned a $600 laptop 3 days after purchasing, they didn't bat an eye, especially after I explained the thing had bad RAM.</p>
<p>Yeah, I know the RAM probably just came unseated, but failed hardware 3 days after bringing it home means an automatic return for me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:52:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985158</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985158" />
    <title>Comment from holytrainwreck on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>holytrainwreck</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c15984115" rel="nofollow">tbax929 is just plain tbax929</a>: AS they rightly should.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:51:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985136</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985136" />
    <title>Comment from AustinTXProgrammer on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>AustinTXProgrammer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982738" rel="nofollow">edesignway</a>: We just have Safeway (As Randals)and HEB.  HEB is cheaper than Walmart on many things, Safeway is just pain expen$ive</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:51:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985114</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985114" />
    <title>Comment from veg-o-matic on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>veg-o-matic</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982933" rel="nofollow">squinko - is pretending there's a star</a>: The blatant classism involved in insulting WalMart shoppers (here, and elsewhere on the tubes and real-world tubes) is disgusting.  What's worse is that the people that do it think they're being funny.</p>
<p><a href="http://consumerist.com/5185288/worst-company-in-america-walmart-vs-hp#c11633742" rel="nofollow">This one</a> was truly shameful: "..they're the embodyment of a genetic wasteland...The ones that stand out are the families that roll 3 or 4 generations deep. with the grannie in a scooter who has no concern for anyone around her, her large son in the home made A shirt with his large wife in the mumu and their son and daughter running around in dirty clothes that are falling apart."</p>
<p>Of course it's ok, because clearly they're not human beings like us, right?  HA! HA!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:50:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985106</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985106" />
    <title>Comment from Cyberxion101 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cyberxion101</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15982159" rel="nofollow">Jabberkaty</a>: I'm with you. I'd much rather pay a bit more and get good customer service than stomach the generally ineffectual customer service that I get at Walmart on the rare occasion that I go there.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:50:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15985009</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15985009" />
    <title>Comment from Michael Wales on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael Wales</name>
        <uri>http://www.michaelwales.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.michaelwales.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've never had a problem with Wal-Mart's return policy. Hell, once I returned a baby I found in the parking lot for beer money.</p>
<p>Wal-Mart will take anything - even if you didn't buy it there.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:47:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984996</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984996" />
    <title>Comment from Verucalise(countingcalories) on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Verucalise(countingcalories)</name>
        <uri>http://www.myspace.com/verucalise</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.myspace.com/verucalise">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15982416" rel="nofollow">pgh9fan1</a>: I think the only reason she included it was she might have been miserable to begin with being 9 months pregnant, and didn't need the bullshit. Not to say it has any bearing on the situation, nor did she want "sympathy" points.</p><br />
<p>People standing for 2 hours in a customer service line would feel horrible for the disabled dude with 1 leg having to wait that long.</p><br />
<p>Being preggo 4 times, I can understand the frustration of having to make multiple trips for something as stupid as spray and wash. Half the time, you don't wanna even leave your house that pregnant, afraid of going into labor at any moment. Feet, back, you name it, HURTS.</p><br />
<p>Granted, I probably would of kept that bottle and just bought another one, but oh well. But I maintain she wasn't trying to intentionally garner more sympathy for it. Just stating, maybe, she didn't want to put up with their bullshit being so far along.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:46:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984974</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984974" />
    <title>Comment from scgirl212 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>scgirl212</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982292" rel="nofollow">ZoeSchizzel</a>:</p>
<p>One of the things I can't stand about the Walmarts in my area (San Diego)are all of the people who open packages of cookies, chips etc and eat some while they are walking around and then put them back on the shelves. This goes for cases of soda, water you name it. They do the same thing to the make-up aisles too, open, use it and then just leave it. Has anyone else noticed this?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:46:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984896</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984896" />
    <title>Comment from shepd on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>shepd</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982416" rel="nofollow">pgh9fan1</a>:</p>
<p>Write back with "Our condolences on your pregnancy.  WalMart wants to assure you that we hope it ends soon and that we wish you a quick return to good health with no adverse effects."</p>
<p>If you're going to use what should be a positive event as a negative (like having a broken leg or a disease that makes you wheelchair bound) then you get treated like someone who has experienced a negative event.  Nobody would be insulted by a letter expressing condolences and a short recovery period for a broken arm, right?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:44:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984727</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984727" />
    <title>Comment from MarketMaven on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>MarketMaven</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I stopped shopping at Walmart about a year ago completely even though I was an infrequent shopper to begin with. I tried to return some makeup and all of a sudden their policy had magically changed! The policy on the wall didn't reflect what the CSR was telling me. That's fine Walmart, I was able to return it to the manufacturer who actually stood by their product.</p>
<p>If your values tell you that shopping at a giant mega store to save time is better than the customer service you will get some place else and the money you will save (sorry to burst the bubble for Walmart shoppers but you are getting ripped off) then you have fun with that.</p>
<p>If I was in the middle of nowhere (which is where Walmarts seemed to start), I needed something and I had no other option, I might purchase something. They are a last ditch measure... just like eating at McDonalds.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:39:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984707</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984707" />
    <title>Comment from Verucalise(countingcalories) on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Verucalise(countingcalories)</name>
        <uri>http://www.myspace.com/verucalise</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.myspace.com/verucalise">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15983826" rel="nofollow">floraposte</a>: My disabled daughter cannot STAND the lighting in a Wal Mart for some reason, her senses go nuts! She cries, covers her eyes, just turns into the exorcist. I will shop there here and there, maybe once every month or two, but thats it.</p><br />
<p>I love shopping my local grocery store, Price Chopper. Not because they have absolutely wonderful prices, but it's a pleasure shopping there. They do have great sales, meat is fresh, everything is good- customer service phenomenal. I'm one of those gay people who loves their grocery store ;-) (and no, I don't work for them or have any affiliation)</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:38:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984369</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984369" />
    <title>Comment from SabreDC on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>SabreDC</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982583" rel="nofollow">Smashville_is a statue of limitations</a>: And that's why this site will never truly be helpful to consumers.  It's not a service because they hide information about which stores did things incorrectly.  It's an entertainment blog like TMZ.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:26:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984300</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984300" />
    <title>Comment from Voltanis on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Voltanis</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982635" rel="nofollow">wkm001</a>: Apparently, even that $3 off policy was being abused, so it was quietly killed off at the end of last year.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:24:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984263</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984263" />
    <title>Comment from veg-o-matic on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>veg-o-matic</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982403" rel="nofollow">gparlett</a>: If by "doing more for the working poor" you mean keeping a whole lot of people working for them <i>and</i> poor, then yes.. WalMart has done a whole lot in that area.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:22:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984204</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984204" />
    <title>Comment from tbax929 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>tbax929</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15983312" rel="nofollow">squinko - is pretending there's a star</a>: <br />Mine, too. Fry's Grocery store has been doing it for way longer than Walmart. When I found out Walmart was doing it, I assumed they stole the idea from Fry's.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:20:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984128</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984128" />
    <title>Comment from jade1981 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>jade1981</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I had a similar experience at Target a few years ago. I bought one of those "Simpsons" DVD seasons that were some kind of special edition. The box was made of plastic and shaped like one of the character's heads, and was taped shut on three sides and hinged on the bottom, but was not wrapped in plastic. My dad gave me the same set the next day as a gift, so I went back to Target to return the one I had bought. This was less than 24 hours since I had purchased it, and I had the receipt. The box had not been opened and was still sealed with tape.</p><br />
<p>The customer service employees removed the tape, took the DVDs out and held them up to the light. Then they told me I couldn't return them because they "had already been played." I have no idea what they thought they saw there, but whatever it was had nothing to do with me playing these things. I finally asked for a manager because it was just so ridiculous. The manager gave me the run down but eventually gave me a refund when they figured out I wasn't leaving without one.</p><br />
<p>I thought the whole thing with checking the DVDs to see if they had been played was kind of hilarious.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:17:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984115</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984115" />
    <title>Comment from tbax929 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>tbax929</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15982031" rel="nofollow">Watcher95</a>: <br />Because it's Walmart, and Consumerist never misses an opportunity to bash Wally World.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:16:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984086</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984086" />
    <title>Comment from tbax929 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>tbax929</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>: <br />Because times are tough for a lot of people. If you can afford to shop elsewhere, count your blessings.</p><br />
<p>To whoever mentioned Aldi, we had those when I lived on the East Coast, and the quality of their off-brand stuff was horrible, IMO. We don't have them in Tucson, but I wouldn't shop at one here if we did.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:15:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984041</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984041" />
    <title>Comment from Verucalise(countingcalories) on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Verucalise(countingcalories)</name>
        <uri>http://www.myspace.com/verucalise</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.myspace.com/verucalise">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15983836" rel="nofollow">LadySiren</a>: Damn those kids and their grumbling stomachs.</p><br />
<p>(Speaking as a mother of 4 who tend to have those same bad habits...)</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:14:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984027</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984027" />
    <title>Comment from tbax929 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>tbax929</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15981871" rel="nofollow">Falcon5768</a>: <br />It's the scammers who ruined it for everyone. Walmart used to have one of the most liberal return policies of any store out there. Unfortunately, people took advantage of it, so they became Nazis about returns.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:14:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984017</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984017" />
    <title>Comment from Shadowman615 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shadowman615</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982792" rel="nofollow">Candle.Jack</a>: It doesn't cost extra money to treat a customer with respect.  And just because you are OK with being walked on by some disgruntled store employees doesn't mean everyone else needs to accept it too.  Some of us have a little more self-respect.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:13:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984011</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984011" />
    <title>Comment from morganlh85 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>morganlh85</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982644" rel="nofollow">GreatWhiteNorth</a>: For example, swiping small but expensive items, like razor blades, and just walking up to the return counter and getting a store credit.</p>
<p>Or buying a large item, like a TV, getting your receipt checked at the door, then going right back to electronics, picking up the same exact TV, and walking right back to the door to get the receipt checked. After all, the receipt says you JUST bought the same tv a few minutes before.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:13:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984008</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984008" />
    <title>Comment from tbax929 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>tbax929</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15982792" rel="nofollow">Candle.Jack</a>: <br />Well said. If you want to be treated like you're shopping at Nordstram's (by the way, the salespeople there always seem snooty to me), shop at Nordstram's. You want cheap prices and (possibly) marginal service, Walmart's got you covered.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:13:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15984006</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15984006" />
    <title>Comment from JulesNoctambule on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>JulesNoctambule</name>
        <uri>http://thesouthernreceipt.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://thesouthernreceipt.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982291" rel="nofollow">gparlett</a>: I'd rather take the time (oh, those precious five seconds!) to cut out a coupon and save money at a store with decent customer service than ever darken the door of the local Wal-Mart. I went there once with a friend and it was such a nasty experience I will never go there again.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:13:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983993</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983993" />
    <title>Comment from Covertghost on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Covertghost</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>: I feel bad for the people that don't have awesome local grocery store chains. We have Woodman's. It's employee owned (they don't force unpaid overtime), they have much much better food than any of the normal chains, and it's usually cheaper than even wal-mart.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:12:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983989</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983989" />
    <title>Comment from Verucalise(countingcalories) on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Verucalise(countingcalories)</name>
        <uri>http://www.myspace.com/verucalise</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.myspace.com/verucalise">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15982014" rel="nofollow">floraposte</a>: Touche! Brava. +1</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:12:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983895</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983895" />
    <title>Comment from AirIntake on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>AirIntake</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982830" rel="nofollow">Sanshie</a>: When I'm drunk (also a self induced personal state) everything about my day is also much harder, more tiring, and tear inducing. Why do people look at me funny when I complain?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:09:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983862</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983862" />
    <title>Comment from MrPenny on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>MrPenny</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm pretty sure someone is traveling the country performing this scam with American made beer.....</p>
<p>Tastes that way to me anyhow...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:08:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983859</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983859" />
    <title>Comment from AirIntake on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>AirIntake</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982709" rel="nofollow">RedCatLinux</a>: Whoa here, you got a free bonus quarter and you're still complaining? In these tough economic times, that quarter is a rare gift!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:08:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983836</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983836" />
    <title>Comment from LadySiren on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>LadySiren</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>: Because we're a blended family, I'm now managing a grocery budget for seven; of those seven, five are growing, active kids who have this bad habit of wanting me to feed them on a regular basis.</p>
<p>$.50 may not sound like a great deal of money but trust me, $.50 here and $.50 there, and suddenly you're talking about a sum of money that isn't trivial. Personally, I hate Wally World but unfortunately, I'm driven to shop there because I just can't match the savings I'm able to achieve there at other stores, even with coupons - and I'm a fanatical couponer.</p>
<p>I'd happily give up shopping at Walmart if I could - every time I go there, it's like setting foot in the 18th level of hell.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:07:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983826</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983826" />
    <title>Comment from floraposte on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>floraposte</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15983562" rel="nofollow">Karita</a>: While I think some people's responses do come from snobbishness, I know what you mean about the interiors.  It's also true for me of one of the Meijer stores here (the other doesn't do it to me as much).  There's something about the warehouse feel and the hugeness of scope of what should just be running out to get a gallon of milk that leaves me depressed and tired.  Hey, maybe I've experienced that cultural alienation thing!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:06:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983804</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983804" />
    <title>Comment from Esquire99 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Esquire99</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's a matter of principle, not a matter of principal</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:06:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983774</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983774" />
    <title>Comment from Karita on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Karita</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15983257" rel="nofollow">floraposte</a>: Well, I think there is a limit. If you get ten good years of wear out of an item, I think that's more than enough. I don't think the guarantee exists to make sure you never have to buy clothes again once you have invested in that initial set. My impression has always been that it is there to prevent hassle if a genuine defect shows up more than a few days or weeks after you've purchased the item. I've returned a couple of defective things to L.L. Bean over the years, but it seems wrong to me to return something to them that I have worn out over a period of years. I would be embarrassed to bring one of my flannel shirts from college back to them and say I need another because I wore it to death. But I know many others feel differently.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:04:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983733</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983733" />
    <title>Comment from justagigilo85 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>justagigilo85</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982830" rel="nofollow">Sanshie</a>: Does anybody go into walmart expecting to check out in less than 5 minutes... even when it's quiet? Sounds like a great excuse to STAY HOME.</p>
<p>No sympathy from me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:03:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983660</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983660" />
    <title>Comment from justagigilo85 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>justagigilo85</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982416" rel="nofollow">pgh9fan1</a>: Amen! Terrible way to use the pregnancy card.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T20:01:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983596</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983596" />
    <title>Comment from PLATTWORX on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>PLATTWORX</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>"I will never visit Wal-Mart store #[redacted] again."</p><br />
<p>WE HAVE A WINNER!!</p><br />
<p>Why do people shop Wal-Mart? Why? Is there a reason?<br />The stores in my area are messy, it takes forever to checkout, the staff is often rude when you do encounter a rare staffer.</p><br />
<p>No idea why people even bother! This experience underscores it.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:58:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983562</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983562" />
    <title>Comment from Karita on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Karita</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982577" rel="nofollow">Luna1375</a>: I disagree with that. (Although the post you are responding to does seem a bit elitist.) Anti-Walmart bias comes from more than snobbishness, though I can't quite figure out what it is.</p>
<p>I am one of "those" people - I'm low-paid (despite my law degree), a bit overweight, far from attractive, and I can't afford nice clothes. When looking to buy a home, I seriously considered a trailer home until I found something that was cheaper. I certainly don't think myself above anyone. But there is something about Wal-Mart that is truly overwhelming. I can't bear to spend a lot of time there, as my senses are constantly assaulted. Sure, the shoppers contribute to it, but it's something else as well. I got the same feeling at Ames stores before they went out of business. Put me in a K-Mart, a Target, an X-Pect Discounts FILLED with the undesirables that also shop at Wal-Mart and I am fine. Drop me right in the middle of a trailer park or a Nascar rally and I am fine. Put me in Wal-Mart, and I feel like I'm not going to survive. They create this terrible ambiance, where the lighting and cavernous ceilings amplify every sight and sound to some weird degree.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:57:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983493</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983493" />
    <title>Comment from ludwigk on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>ludwigk</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982297" rel="nofollow">SoCalGNX</a>: Scammers should work a little corn starch into the bottle to re-thicken after watering it down. Ok, I guess I'm going to hell for that one...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:54:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983478</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983478" />
    <title>Comment from Cool story bro on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cool story bro</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>"I'm seriously considering just doing my shopping at local grocery stores... from now on"</p>
<p>You should be doing this anyway.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:54:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983341</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983341" />
    <title>Comment from Karita on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Karita</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982159" rel="nofollow">Jabberkaty</a>: Wow - how much do you pay, then? It must be a huge amount, as my experience with the higher-end stores, or just the regular non-discount stores, has always been worse than at the discount chain stores.</p>
<p>The clerks at expensive stores seem to be, in general, a lot more suspicious of returns. Every time I have returned something at a place like Saks or Nordstrom, I walk away feeling dirty, and I have in the past just thrown defective things away rather than deal with what I know is going to be an uncomfortable situation. I'd rather the rude clerks at Wal-Mart than the nasty suspicious ones at many other stores.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:49:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983312</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983312" />
    <title>Comment from squinko on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>squinko</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982915" rel="nofollow">K-Bo</a>: A few local chains in my area had been doing it for several months beforehand. Wal-Mart just has national recognition, so it seems like they did it first.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:48:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983297</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983297" />
    <title>Comment from shibblegritz on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>shibblegritz</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Is it not conceivable that, perhaps, the lady was, in fact, trying to rip the store off and doth protest too much in an effort to retain what little honor she may yet retain?</p>
<p>There are an awful lot of dishonest, corrupt moochers in the world, and just by sheer numbers, most of them don't own or manage corporations.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:48:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983284</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983284" />
    <title>Comment from Colonel Jack O&apos;Neill on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Colonel Jack O&apos;Neill</name>
        <uri>http://www.mrgpt.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mrgpt.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>Why the hell is she complaining about, in the end, she got an exchange.</p>
<p>Why do people hate Walmart so much, they probably never been to one. You only hear about the bad experience they said they had, you never hear about the thousands or millions of good experiences people have.</p>
<p>People like to complain just to complain.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:48:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983278</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983278" />
    <title>Comment from squinko on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>squinko</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15983092" rel="nofollow">pxf9641</a>: While that site is funny, it doesn't disprove her point. I rarely hear anyone complain about other stores' shoppers when there are stories on here. It really is a class thing. You will not see that happen in any articles about other stores.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:48:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983257</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983257" />
    <title>Comment from floraposte on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>floraposte</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15983029" rel="nofollow">Karita</a>: Oh, that is incredibly sad.</p>
<p>I've got a question about the lifetime guarantee thing, though.  I get that the first example, the stain, is owner fault, but isn't the second example exactly what a lifetime guarantee is about?  The pants wore out through normal use, and the company basically guaranteed they wouldn't do that.  Otherwise it seems like wanting really to have a limited-year guarantee but wanting the credit for having an unlimited one.  (Actually, my guess is that so many people wear stuff out and don't take advantage of the lifetime guarantee--I know I never do--that it ends up even anyway.)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:47:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983224</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983224" />
    <title>Comment from vladthepaler on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>vladthepaler</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>As always, redacting information takes away the usefulness of the story. Walmart is a huge company; the post is about a specific problem at one of its many stores. Which store is calling its customer a criminal? Which store might informed consumers want to avoid? We don't know, Consumerist won't tell us.</p>
<p>In this case, redacting also leaves the situation a bit obscure: did the OP return the detergent to the same store as that from which she bought it? If not, it's possible that was a factor in initially rejecting the return.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:46:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983212</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983212" />
    <title>Comment from bombhand on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>bombhand</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c15982003" rel="nofollow">yentaleh</a>: I'm not so sure about that. Every Zellers I've ever been in has been terrible as far as its employees go. They're understaffed and terribly untidy, and the employees they do have are the most apathetic I've come across.</p><br />
<p>At least where I live, the Zellers is staffed by the people Wal-mart didn't want to hire, because Wal-mart pays a couple dollars more hourly to start.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:45:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983127</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983127" />
    <title>Comment from Karita on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Karita</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982390" rel="nofollow">Red-headed bookworm</a>: Target surprised me the other day. I lost my receipt, and I knew that the policy on clothing returns is that they are unworn. Unfortunately, I didn't notice until after I had washed the pants I bought there, that the legs were two drastically different lengths. I was sure they'd say no, but I went anyway, and was very happy when they gave me store credit with no hassles.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:41:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983092</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983092" />
    <title>Comment from b4k4 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>b4k4</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982577" rel="nofollow">Luna1375</a>: Have you SEEN the kind of people WalMart brings out of the woodwork?</p>
<p>I shall take this opportunity to direct you to <a href="http://www.peopleofwalmart.com/" rel="nofollow">[www.peopleofwalmart.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:40:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983029</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983029" />
    <title>Comment from Karita on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Karita</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982644" rel="nofollow">GreatWhiteNorth</a>: I don't know if this is too outrageous, but I worked at a clothing store where we had a lifetime guarantee on our products. (Not L.L. Bean, but I hear they are similar.) I would get so mad processing returns or exchanges when someone had stained their shirt, or the pants wore out in the wash but they were ones we hadn't sold in 10 years. Sure, it's the letter of the policy, but it certainly wasn't the spirit.</p>
<p>The only time I didn't complain was when a poor old lady came in with some shirts and a death certificate. Her husband had passed away a few days before, and she wanted to return clothes to get money for his funeral. Until I left retail, that was probably the saddest thing I ever saw.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:38:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15983004</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15983004" />
    <title>Comment from HeyApples on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>HeyApples</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15981871" rel="nofollow">Falcon5768</a>:</p><br />
<p>Yeah, completely agree. Walmart has been a target of scams on everything from food to electronics, so I understand their paranoia, even if it ensnared an innocent bystander.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:37:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982995</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982995" />
    <title>Comment from captadam on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>captadam</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The manager clearly acted like a jerk ... but, from my perspective, I don't want to buy detergent as "new" if it made a trip to somebody's home and back to the store. Somebody could easily spike a bottle with bleach just to be a prankster.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:36:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982976</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982976" />
    <title>Comment from Luna1375 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Luna1375</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982857" rel="nofollow">K-Bo</a>: I'm in Atlanta, so maybe that's why I hear the not-white angle more.  Wal-mart here is considered where the "illegals" shop, though how you can tell someone's immigration status just by looking at them is beyond my comprehension.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:36:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982933</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982933" />
    <title>Comment from squinko on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>squinko</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982577" rel="nofollow">Luna1375</a>: "Anti-Walmart bias is, in many if not most cases, based on snobbishness and classism."</p>
<p>You know what? That's a really good point. I've never heard people insult the patrons of other stores on this site, just Wal-Mart.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:34:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982915</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982915" />
    <title>Comment from K-Bo on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>K-Bo</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982740" rel="nofollow">squinko - is pretending there's a star</a>: In my area, they all did it to compete with walmart. No one around here had ever heard of such a thing before walmart.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:33:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982893</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982893" />
    <title>Comment from floraposte on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>floraposte</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982635" rel="nofollow">wkm001</a>: The "more than x number of people in each line" were in vogue in various chains for a while, and of course failed miserably--what store kept checkers on ice in the back just waiting for lines to get long?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:32:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982857</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982857" />
    <title>Comment from K-Bo on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>K-Bo</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982577" rel="nofollow">Luna1375</a>: Rarely do I hear complaints about walmart customers being not white. Actually, much more often than I hear complaints about that, I see the phrase "white trash" or "white trailer trash" I do see the other complaints being made here. The people I see in walmart are the same people I see in my office building, Harris Teeter and the gym. They represent all the same groups seen in the town around them.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:30:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982830</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982830" />
    <title>Comment from Sanshie on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sanshie</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>If you have never been 9 months pregnant, then you can't say anything about her mentioning this. When you are 9 months pregnant, everything about your day is much harder, more tiring, and tear inducing. She's allowed to complain!!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:29:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982810</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982810" />
    <title>Comment from Smashville_OrderingOJandTakingNames on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Smashville_OrderingOJandTakingNames</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15982031" rel="nofollow">Watcher95</a>: Because this is exactly why this site was created? Bad customer service = Consumerist story.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:29:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982792</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982792" />
    <title>Comment from Candle.Jack on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Candle.Jack</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981839" rel="nofollow">I_Elohel</a>: At this point, I can't believe anyone would be, nor should they.  I regularly get about $75 worth or groceries at Wal Mart that would have cost me over $100 at any grocery store, and I understand that in shopping there, I am most likely going to be faced with a low level of customer service (should I need it) in exchange for that savings AND I'M OK WITH THAT!</p>
<p>We should ALL understand this by now. This person commented that this made her consider shopping somewhere else- DUH! I like to shop at Walmart because it's cheaper, but that saivings isn't free. If you want them to start returning items from anyone, no questions asked, then it's going to eat into their profits, and then you'll complain that Walmart got more expensive. This concept really doesn't require an advanced degree to understand.</p>
<p>You can't have it all people. If you want cheap stuff, go to Walmart. If you want customer service, go elsewhere.</p>
<p>Once in a while, the complaining consumer is the one who is wrong- this is one of those times. If I were that manager, I would have told her to shove off.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:28:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982754</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982754" />
    <title>Comment from Falcon5768 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Falcon5768</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982566" rel="nofollow">squinko - is pretending there's a star</a>: I do but I actually have been OK with food as the whole situation happened right after I stocked up the freezer with 250 dollars worth of meats and fish for 2 people, so aside from broth for soup making or non-frozen vegetables I have not had the money crunch hit my food.</p>
<p>Certainly has hurt other things, but I'm rectifying that by moving out of my apartment come feb for cheaper living arrangements.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:26:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982740</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982740" />
    <title>Comment from squinko on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>squinko</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982403" rel="nofollow">gparlett</a>: There are several other chains that have those prescription deals, and many of them had them before Wal-Mart did.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:25:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982738</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982738" />
    <title>Comment from edesignway on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>edesignway</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>: Where I live, we have Albertsons, Kroger, SafeWay, and Wal-Mart... Just as gparlett, without putting in any effort I save easily $40 on groceries just shopping at Wal-Mart. Occasionally I will coupon hunt and it is just that much more on top of that $40.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:25:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982709</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982709" />
    <title>Comment from RedCatLinux on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>RedCatLinux</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Sometimes Target has better prices on the same items.</p><br />
<p>No kidding. Your mileage may vary.</p><br />
<p>But all that aside, let's boil it down to the actual problem.</p><br />
<p>Customer purchased wrong item. Customer returned the item according to the posted return policy. Customer service failed the spirit of thier purpose, even if they eventually did abide by the letter of the return policy after some pressing.</p><br />
<p>Unless the customer service rep is skilled in judging the texture and color of the contents of bottles, AND they checked it's contents when it was purchased, they are out of line.</p><br />
<p>The last time I had to return something to Wall*Fart, it was an inoperative coin sorter. The paper coin rolls that it was supposed to have come with were missing, and there was a quarter jammed in the mechanism, stopping it from working.</p><br />
<p>I made a quarter, but clearly someone used and returned the item to the store already. Whoever accepted the return previously had not been paying attention. That didn't mean that I was not within my rights to expect and receive a full refund.</p><br />
<p>WalMart can change their policy, train their staff better (Heh) or alienate the legimate customers with accusations of theft when taking them up on their return policy.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:24:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982696</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982696" />
    <title>Comment from K-Bo on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>K-Bo</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982502" rel="nofollow">Saboth</a>: Exactly, I've had "misery-inducing, wretched customer service experience" and it never involved getting what I wanted with less than 30 mins of arguing. I'd actually call this a good recovery for wal-mart. Maybe they never should have denied it to begin with, but it seems as soon as she argued, they relented. I've seen much much worse.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:24:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982657</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982657" />
    <title>Comment from floraposte on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>floraposte</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982180" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: So change the policy, then.  Don't have a "returns are fine" policy and then work over a customer who's foolish enough to believe it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:22:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982656</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982656" />
    <title>Comment from squinko on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>squinko</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982031" rel="nofollow">Watcher95</a>: I love when people on this site freak out about having to stop for 15 seconds to show a receipt and how they're being treated like a criminal and the world in ending and everything is terrible and how dare a company accuse them of stealing and what about the Constitution and unlawful detainment.</p>
<p>Then there's a similar situation (someone is basically accused of being a thief) and then people cry about how it's no big deal, they returned the product anyway, etc. You can't say being treated like a criminal in one situation is bad while the other isn't.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:22:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982655</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982655" />
    <title>Comment from burnedout on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>burnedout</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982390" rel="nofollow">Red-headed bookworm</a>: Target has AWFUL return policies - just try to exchange something off the gift registry or with one of the gift receipts that they automatically print for you or if the item has mysteriously dropped in price.</p>
<p>I received (as a wedding gift) a set of sheets where all the pillow cases had torn seams - tried to return it the same day I received with the gift receipt and the packing slip and they refused to even exchange it because the purchase date was outside their return window.  Nevermind that it was outside the return window because it was backordered and took forever to get to my house...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:22:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982644</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982644" />
    <title>Comment from GreatWhiteNorth on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>GreatWhiteNorth</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982135" rel="nofollow">morganlh85</a>: ...so give us an idea of what folks got away with... Not being of the mind to pull this sort of crap I have no idea what folks try.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:22:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982635</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982635" />
    <title>Comment from wkm001 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>wkm001</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>A few signs you never see in Walmart anymore:</p>
<p>1. If your item does not ring up at the correct price we'll give you $3 off.</p>
<p>2. If there are more than X number of people in each open line, we will open another one.</p>
<p>3. No hassle return policy.</p>
<p>I guess they felt it is too expensive to keep those signs posted.  They never lived up to them anyway.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:21:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982622</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982622" />
    <title>Comment from DoubleEcho on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>DoubleEcho</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15982031" rel="nofollow">Watcher95</a>: I think you need to level up your Reading Comprehensiion and Reasoning skills a little. She may have gotten the exchange but she was treated like a criminal by a clueless manager. How hard would it have been to get another bottle of the same product and compare them?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:21:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982620</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982620" />
    <title>Comment from floraposte on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>floraposte</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982502" rel="nofollow">Saboth</a>: I'm going to cut some slack to a woman who's nine months pregnant there; I thought that some of her terms were a little strong for the situation, but I also get that standing there, trying to return an item as the store says you should be able to, and being subjected to challenges to your honesty instead can be really frustrating.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:21:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982583</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982583" />
    <title>Comment from Smashville_OrderingOJandTakingNames on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Smashville_OrderingOJandTakingNames</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Why redact the store number? Wouldn't we want to know which store this was?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:19:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982577</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982577" />
    <title>Comment from Luna1375 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Luna1375</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982292" rel="nofollow">ZoeSchizzel</a>: It's interesting how in every Walmart article, the anti-Walmart posts will inevitably have one or two that attack the shoppers. The undercurrent is "I can't bear to shop where THOSE people shop, ugh.  They're not white, not rich, not thin, not fashionable, and they have the nerve to bring their kids with them instead of leaving them with the nanny like decent people do.  I'm way too good for that kind of store." Anti-Walmart bias is, in many if not most cases, based on snobbishness and classism.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:19:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982566</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982566" />
    <title>Comment from squinko on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>squinko</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982063" rel="nofollow">Falcon5768</a>: Do you have an Aldi's in your area? They're a lot cheaper than Wal-Mart and their food usually tastes better than Wal-Mart's generic brand</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:19:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982522</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982522" />
    <title>Comment from Saboth on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Saboth</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982107" rel="nofollow">bagumpity</a>:</p>
<p>Unless they live only a few miles away, they will probably spend $2-$3 in gas for the trip.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:17:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982502</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982502" />
    <title>Comment from Saboth on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Saboth</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982031" rel="nofollow">Watcher95</a>:</p>
<p>It seemed like a bit of overreaction to me. So..having someone deny your exchange for a few minutes, then change their minds is the most "misery-inducing, wretched customer service experience", that made someone "humilated" and "angry"? Sheesh.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:16:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982477</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982477" />
    <title>Comment from thelushie on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>thelushie</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c15982390" rel="nofollow">Red-headed bookworm</a>: And maybe this walmart was just staffed by rude people. I have never had trouble returning anything to Walmart. Half the time they don't even look at it.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:15:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982468</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982468" />
    <title>Comment from michigan2cv on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>michigan2cv</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Thank goodness for Meijer. What is a WalMart?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:15:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982441</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982441" />
    <title>Comment from TheSkaAssassin on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>TheSkaAssassin</name>
        <uri>http://facebook.com/nlagrassa</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://facebook.com/nlagrassa">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15982180" rel="nofollow">nstonep</a>: <br />Thye could at least have gotten another bottle of spray and wash to check the consistency.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:13:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982416</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982416" />
    <title>Comment from pgh9fan1 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>pgh9fan1</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>What does it matter that she's pregnant? It's completely irrelevant to the return. She put that in the letter for only to garner some extra sympathy points. If I were Wal-Mart I'd write back and apologize for the rudeness of the manager and say somewhere in the letter something to the effect that, "We're sorry about your experience. We try to handle all customers, pregnant or not, with respect..."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:12:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982414</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982414" />
    <title>Comment from TheSkaAssassin on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>TheSkaAssassin</name>
        <uri>http://facebook.com/nlagrassa</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://facebook.com/nlagrassa">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>: Often times its just convience. I'm in college and the only store close enough is Wal-Mart.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:12:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982403</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982403" />
    <title>Comment from gparlett on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>gparlett</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>oh and finally we all like to rip on WalMart, but honestly, $4 prescriptions did a lot more for the uninsured and the working poor than the government has.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:12:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982390</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982390" />
    <title>Comment from Red-headed bookworm on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Red-headed bookworm</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5380375/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return#c15982157" rel="nofollow">morganlh85</a>: I've never had a problem returning anything to Target, maybe your local store is just staffed with rude people? Of course, I'm a pack rat and keep all my receipts until I'm sure I don't need to return or exchange anything.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:11:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982384</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982384" />
    <title>Comment from Falcon5768 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Falcon5768</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982031" rel="nofollow">Watcher95</a>: because it shouldn't have been a rude/inconvenient product exchange.</p>
<p>AND last I checked this was The Consumerist... you know for the consumer? Sometimes embarrassing the hell out of a company publicly is the best way to get said company to better instruct its managers on the nature of consumer service.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:11:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982354</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982354" />
    <title>Comment from gparlett on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>gparlett</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>And at a bigger level, pickles aren't that important to me, neither is bread or diet coke or lunch meat or cat litter.  Since they aren't very important to me I chose to not spend a lot of my money on them.  Instead I save my limited resources for other things that are important to me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:10:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982341</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982341" />
    <title>Comment from rewind on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>rewind</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982227" rel="nofollow">pot_roast</a>:</p>
<p>Maybe Consumerist should just put up a daily "stories we received about failed Wal-Mart customer service" article, then the news can be about the day it doesn't happen...and hell freezes over.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:10:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982320</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982320" />
    <title>Comment from coss3n on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>coss3n</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982227" rel="nofollow">pot_roast</a>: Get ready for the "way to blame the victim" posts.</p>
<p>Seriously, nothing in this world is free.  If you want the rock-bottom price at Walmart, expect to be treated like shit (and to get shit-quality merchandise).  If you want to be treated like a human being, go somewhere else and pay a little more.  Nothing in this post should come as a surprise to anybody.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:09:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982310</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982310" />
    <title>Comment from K-Bo on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>K-Bo</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15982031" rel="nofollow">Watcher95</a>: Yeah, I'm with you on that. Having worked the customer service desk (not at walmart) for 3 years, this sounds pretty normal. They make just over minimum wage, they are going to do what they are told in an attempt to not loose their job. Sometimes stores make policies that require the service desk person to ask a manager every time they return a certain item. Certain managers always say no, in an attempt to help sales numbers, but count on a certain percent arguing. If you argue, you always get it. This sounds like what happened here. Trust me, the service desk people live through it 20x a day, and hate it more than the customer.</p>
<p>I wouldn't have taken it so personally, and if I did find myself feeling mistreated, I'd leave with the wrong detergent and donate it to a charity. It couldn't be more than $10-$15 dollars ( and that's if it's one of the huge 120 load bottles) Not to say $10-$15 is not significant money, but it's not worth being humiliated and vilified and all the things this customer claimed to feel.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:08:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982297</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982297" />
    <title>Comment from SoCalGNX on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>SoCalGNX</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The water in the soap scam doesn't surprise me. Anything is possible these days. Walmart is only useful to a certain point. They aren't the cheapest place to buy lots of things and their prices vary wildly from store to store.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:07:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982292</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982292" />
    <title>Comment from ZoeSchizzel on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>ZoeSchizzel</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Why does anyone who doesn't HAVE to shop at Walmart shop at Walmart? Their prices are NOT that great, especially if you shop the BOGO sales at other grocery stores and drug stores, and their in-store products and brands are terrible and a terrible value. Every time I walk into a Walmart (which hasn't happened in a very long time) all of my senses are assaulted -- the echoing sounds of bratty screaming, the gulag lighting, and the waddle of customers wearing house shoes OUT OF THE HOUSE! See...they are "house" shoes. Nevermind.</p><br />
<p>I brought my husband with me to a Publix once and he walked in, blinked with suprise and delight. "Wow. This is nice. Is that James Taylor I'm hearing? Do they refuse entry to people with crying children here?"</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:07:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982291</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982291" />
    <title>Comment from gparlett on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>gparlett</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's 50 cents on pickles, and 50 cents on everything else I buy weekly.  I easily save $20-$40 a week shopping at WalMart.  Not by checking sales or clipping coupons or putting a lot of work into it, simply by walking through the doors at WalMart.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:07:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982227</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982227" />
    <title>Comment from pot_roast on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>pot_roast</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Bla bla bla "I'm pregnant, I deserve special treatment" bla bla bla "I'll shop at Target from now on" bla bla bla.<br />(Yet she got what she came for?)</p><br />
<p>Sometimes the anti Wal-Mart bias gets a little tiring.</p><br />
<p>Unfortunately, people DO abuse Wal-Mart's return policy. People abuse Costco's return policy too. It's a sad but true fact that the few bad apples will spoil it for everybody else. This is certainly not an uncommon occurrence either.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:03:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982180</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982180" />
    <title>Comment from nstonep on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>nstonep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't feel bad at all.  First off this is under the guise of a perishable (even though it's not perishable).</p>
<p>In high school when I worked retail I had a ton of people come in to return stuff after a delay (ie more than 1 week) and we were instructed to open the box as people would take stuff out then replace it with newspapers (or even rocks for heavy stuff) then reseal the box with hot glue, keep the merchandise and try to get a refund.</p>
<p>That was for sealed merchandise, most laundry detergents aren't even sealed.  How is a store supposed to know if the woman used the stuff then topped it off with water (or just replaced with water) and brought it back.</p>
<p>What's the average return visit rate for walmart customers (I would think at least once a week)?  That's why they and I call shenanigans.</p>
<p>When someone tries to pull this off then another customer just ends up paying for it, because they'll put it back on the shelf.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:01:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982171</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982171" />
    <title>Comment from K-Bo on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>K-Bo</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>: 50 cents on a jar of pickles, no, $2-$4 per bag of cat litter, yeah. Just can't bring myself to pay $15 for 15 lbs of clay my cat is just going to pee on.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:01:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982159</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982159" />
    <title>Comment from Jabberkaty on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jabberkaty</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm willing to pay more to avoid being treated like a thief and a convict.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:00:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982157</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982157" />
    <title>Comment from morganlh85 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>morganlh85</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Although I must say, exchanges and returns at Target are by no means any easier...they simply refuse half your returns before you even get a word out.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T19:00:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982135</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982135" />
    <title>Comment from morganlh85 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>morganlh85</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>My mom worked customer service at Walmart for 10 years...there were a LOT of scams going on, but she wasn't allowed to do anything about it. Loss prevention had to handle all that stuff. As customer service, she had no authority to refuse returns.</p>
<p>You wouldn't even believe the stuff they had to let people get away with...</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T18:59:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982107</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982107" />
    <title>Comment from bagumpity on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>bagumpity</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I had no idea this scam even existed.  Are people so sick that they would do something like that?  At minimum wage, just the time spent driving to Wal Mart would net you enough cash to buy a full bottle of detergent.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T18:58:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982078</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982078" />
    <title>Comment from cotr on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>cotr</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>Threat Level Privacy, Crime and Security Online<br />
Big-Box Breach: The Inside Story of Wal-Mart's Hacker Attack</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/10/walmart-hack/" rel="nofollow">[www.wired.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T18:57:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982063</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982063" />
    <title>Comment from Falcon5768 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Falcon5768</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>: Dealing with a situation where I am financially tight for reasons out of my control (pending divorce and having to take up full financial responsibility leaving me with a lot less a month than I had previously)</p>
<p>Yeah .50 really has become that important to me. And I was not a extravagant spender PRIOR to my wife cheating on me and my kicking her out.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T18:57:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982031</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982031" />
    <title>Comment from Watcher95 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Watcher95</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>So the OP got her exchange?</p>
<p>How did a successful (although somewhat rude/inconvenient) product exchange become a headline story?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T18:55:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982014</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982014" />
    <title>Comment from floraposte on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>floraposte</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15981957" rel="nofollow">Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</a>: No.  Because no one in this country is out of work or underpaid.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T18:55:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15982003</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15982003" />
    <title>Comment from yentaleh on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>yentaleh</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is among many reasons I don't shop at Wally world. I feel for this woman, too bad she's not in Canada. I shop at Zellers alot and I have never had a problem with making exchanges/returns. Wallmart has grown so big that its lost sight of its original message. With Wallmart its all about the bottom line, screw the customer, and make them feel inferior. I would rather pay more shopping at places that take in a classier clientele and have excellent customer service/relations then save a few bucks being ridiculed, humiliated, and accused.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T18:54:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15981957</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15981957" />
    <title>Comment from Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Evil Otto - sleep deprived ftl</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Why does anyone shop at WalMart?  Is saving 50 cents on a jar of pickles THAT important to people?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T18:52:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15981871</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15981871" />
    <title>Comment from Falcon5768 on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Falcon5768</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>just returning anything to a walmart is just plain useless. They get hit with so many scams that they suspect every single person in line these days.</p>
<p>Its in part one of the many reasons I rarely if ever shop there (receipt checking and general disgusting store being the other two)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T18:48:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375-comment:15981839</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5380375" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/walmart-thinks-woman-is-laundry-soap-thief-refuses-return.html#c15981839" />
    <title>Comment from I_Elohel on 2009-10-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>I_Elohel</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Who's surprised?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-13T18:46:11Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



