<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T10:50:44Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Federal Employees Banned From Texting While Driving</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5372937" title="Federal Employees Banned From Texting While Driving" />
    <published>2009-10-02T23:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-02T20:53:06Z</updated>
    <title>Federal Employees Banned From Texting While Driving</title>
    <summary>--&gt;An executive order issued this week bans federal employees from texting while driving when using government vehicles or phones, or while on government business. Given the safety risks of texting while driving, we think this was a good move, and hope that it extends to the general population. Take our poll and tell us what you think, inside.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Alex Chasick</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Recalls and Safety" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/consumerist/2009/10/statetexter.jpg" width="158" height="183" />-->An <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/02/technology/02distracted.html">executive order</a> issued this week bans federal employees from <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged TEXTING WHILE DRIVING" title="Click here to read more posts tagged TEXTING WHILE DRIVING" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/texting-while-driving/">texting while driving</a> when using government vehicles or phones, or while on government business. Given the <a href="http://consumerist.com/5350194/">safety risks</a> of texting while driving, we think this was a good move, and hope that it extends to the general population. Take our poll and tell us what you think, inside.</p>
]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><br  clear="all"  /><br />
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/2068637.js"></script><noscript><br />
<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/2068637/">How should texting while driving be curtailed?</a><span style="font-size:9px;">(<a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com">opinion</a>)</span><br />
</noscript><br />
(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jgodsey/371141226/">jgodsey</a>)</p>
]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:20010855</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c20010855" />
    <title>Comment from John Rob on 2009-12-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>John Rob</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>When distracted I do not complete any work. I concentrate fully on the work I do, I use <a href="http://www.drivesafe.ly/" rel="nofollow">http://www.drivesafe.ly/</a> mobile application to refrain from texting and from reading my incoming text messages. <br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-05T14:34:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15783691</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15783691" />
    <title>Comment from mrearly2 on 2009-10-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>mrearly2</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Technically, under Constitutional law, the Federal government has no jurisdiction over state Citizens. In Law, they can only legislate for those residing in Federal Zones (such as Washington, D.C. and other federally-held properties) and employees of the Federal government corporation. <br />
In reality, though, we are not ruled by law (but by an Admiralty jurisdiction, as evidenced by the countless Public Policy Statutes which we must observe, not as freemen, but as subjects of the Feds). <br />
The enaction of yet another rule against us is (as always) justified by the "it's meant to keep you safe" propaganda. All the Public Policy Statues are intended only for revenue, and control of the little people. <br />
Because most peoples' thought processes are skewed, I must state that I am in no way condoning the irresponsible practice of texting whilst driving.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T22:16:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15779562</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15779562" />
    <title>Comment from MooseOfReason on 2009-10-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>MooseOfReason</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great.  Now how about an executive order banning extraordinary rendition?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T09:52:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15779022</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15779022" />
    <title>Comment from locakitty on 2009-10-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>locakitty</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15768384" rel="nofollow">2 replies by</a>: I've heard of ticketing for this in Tucson as well.  I haven't seen it, but a friend of mine did.  OMGSNOPES!</p>
<p>I've been very careful with horn use ever since.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T09:08:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15775548</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15775548" />
    <title>Comment from StanTheManDean on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>StanTheManDean</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5372937/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving#c15771196" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>:</p><br />
<p>Darn, you too?</p><br />
<p>Seriously, I use to read the morning paper on my long communte.</p><br />
<p>I drove into the back of the 18 wheeler.</p><br />
<p>Fortunately he was not stopped and I was coasting in traffic.</p><br />
<p>Stopped my bad habit.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T04:56:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15773957</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15773957" />
    <title>Comment from FigNinja on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>FigNinja</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15773060" rel="nofollow">chapoec</a>: That's still taking way too much attention from the ton of metal and glass that's hurtling along the highway under your control inches only a few feet away from other people.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T03:26:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15773128</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15773128" />
    <title>Comment from chapoec on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>chapoec</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15768531" rel="nofollow">yevarechecha</a>: Yes texting on a blackberry is very dangerous. Too many keys. If you are going to text while driving use a regular phone that has T9 activated. Once you remember the keys there is no need to look down while typing. You only look at the phone just before sending message to check for errors.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T02:49:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15773060</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15773060" />
    <title>Comment from chapoec on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>chapoec</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15767593" rel="nofollow">redskull</a>: There is always T9 and the fact that its easy to memorize the keys. All you have to do is check the message for errors and send it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T02:45:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15772850</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15772850" />
    <title>Comment from 2 replies on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>2 replies</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15771196" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: I know, dosen't it?<br />
And I always end up getting the phone all covered in flower. Sometimes the phone even falls in the cake batter!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T02:36:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15772746</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15772746" />
    <title>Comment from 2 replies on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>2 replies</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15770624" rel="nofollow">tbax929 is back from the beach</a>: <br />
I agree in terms of handset use, but since there <i>are</i> factory-installed, auto-answering, hands-free units that use bluetooth &amp; the sterio to allow the driver to answer calls while never removing their eyes from the road or hands from the wheel. (Not saying they're safe, just saying they're safer than having a handset glued to your ear while only having one hand on the wheel.)</p>
<p>They just need to add an enabled-by-default feature that before activating the microphone, it informs the other party that the user is driving and the call-time is limited. Then auto-hangs up after a warning that the allowed call-time expired.<br />
(Just an idea. :-p)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T02:32:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15771675</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15771675" />
    <title>Comment from HogwartsAlum on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>HogwartsAlum</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15771151" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: Are you kidding? People are bringing more and more small children to R-rated movies every day.  There were young kids behind me at "Watchmen."</p>
<p>Maybe I should shove their kids up their ass. ;)</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T01:52:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15771196</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15771196" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I never text while driving. It interferes with my newspaper reading too much.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T01:36:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15771151</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15771151" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15770318" rel="nofollow">HogwartsAlum</a>: But hopefully, only at a PG-13 or higher theater seating, because otherwise your retribution may be contain scenes too graphic for immature audiences.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T01:34:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15771030</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15771030" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15769552" rel="nofollow">floraposte</a>: Versus the<i> (You've Got to) Lick It Before We Kick It</i> law should be decided on an ad hoc basis, couple by couple, with females getting 1.75 votes to every 1.0 male vote.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T01:31:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15770929</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15770929" />
    <title>Comment from GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite</name>
        <uri>http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15770482" rel="nofollow">tbax929 is back from the beach</a>: That I usually listen to my iPod while driving.  But because I was playing a video and occasionally shifting my gaze from the road, I passed a State Trooper in an obvious unmarked car that I didn't even realize I passed.  Texting is even worse because you have to press buttons as well.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T01:28:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15770905</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15770905" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If only the whole Text-Driving issue were decided at the state level. That way, the magic of the marketplace would allow states to develop the best, safest and most cost-effective policies and drivers across the US could choose which state has the best policies that best suit him/her then conform to that other state's laws when driving in his/her own state.<br />
(Hey, if it'll "work" for health insurance, it's <b>gotta </b>work for this, right?)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T01:27:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15770624</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15770624" />
    <title>Comment from tbax929 on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>tbax929</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5372937/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving#c15769069" rel="nofollow">thrlsekr</a>: <br />Agreed. I can usually tell someone is on the phone just because of the way they're driving. We all survived many years of not having them available; that call can't wait until you get home? Really?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T01:17:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15770604</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15770604" />
    <title>Comment from tbax929 on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>tbax929</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5372937/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving#c15768531" rel="nofollow">yevarechecha</a>: <br />He was driving with elbows while typing on a Blackberry? They should just impounded his car afterward. He's too stupid to have one.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T01:16:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15770547</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15770547" />
    <title>Comment from tbax929 on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>tbax929</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5372937/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving#c15767639" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: <br />Agreed. In my job I review MVRs all the time. The more detail on them the better. "Unsafe driving" tells me very little about an offense. Driving While Texting on an MVR would be fairly clear.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T01:14:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15770496</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15770496" />
    <title>Comment from tbax929 on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>tbax929</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5372937/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving#c15767260" rel="nofollow">AgentTuttle</a>: <br />They are cops and are, therefore, above the law.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T01:12:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15770482</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15770482" />
    <title>Comment from tbax929 on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>tbax929</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5372937/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving#c15767254" rel="nofollow">GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite</a>: <br />LOL. You lost me at hello. What are you talking about?!?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T01:12:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15770400</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15770400" />
    <title>Comment from tbax929 on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>tbax929</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5372937/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving#c15770318" rel="nofollow">HogwartsAlum</a>:</p><br />
<p>+1. It's so friggin' annoying in theaters. We're at a point where we don't go to see anything remotely popular, at least not until it's been out for a while. The lack of movie etiquette is astonishing to me.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T01:09:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15770318</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15770318" />
    <title>Comment from HogwartsAlum on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>HogwartsAlum</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15766638" rel="nofollow">maruawe42</a>: Yes it IS distracting in a movie.  The little screen is bright and the *clickclickclickclick* makes me want to shove the phone up the person's ass.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T01:07:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15770236</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15770236" />
    <title>Comment from HogwartsAlum on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>HogwartsAlum</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15767664" rel="nofollow">FaustianSlip</a>: That's a good idea, Driving while Distracted.  That pretty much covers everything.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T01:04:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15769570</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15769570" />
    <title>Comment from hi on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>hi</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c15766424" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: We finally agree on something. States should set the law. My reason is because the states are supposed to set the laws. States gave the federal government it's powers, not the other way around.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T00:43:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15769552</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15769552" />
    <title>Comment from floraposte on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>floraposte</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15766424" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: Though the minimum age for alcohol purchase is de facto federal, because it's tied to highway funding.  I believe "Click It or Ticket" and .08 as a limit may be as well. So the state has a right to set a different law--if it's willing to forgo millions to do it.  I could see distracted driving enforcement falling into that same category.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T00:43:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15769350</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15769350" />
    <title>Comment from sgtcody on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>sgtcody</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Only the states can know what's best for their citizens. The federal government has no business meddling in local law enforcement matters.<br />That said I would support such a law at state/city level.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T00:36:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15769170</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15769170" />
    <title>Comment from GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite</name>
        <uri>http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15768384" rel="nofollow">2 replies by</a>: In most states it's not illegal to drive in a puddle to splash people on the sidewalk.  Just a weird fact.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T00:29:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15769069</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15769069" />
    <title>Comment from thrlsekr on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>thrlsekr</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Let's get phones totally out of the driving experience!</p>
<p>Can't say how many times I have had to react to a driver on the phone or be behind one on the interstate in the left hand lane with no clue of the results of their actions!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T00:25:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15769054</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15769054" />
    <title>Comment from supercereal on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>supercereal</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15766700" rel="nofollow">MercuryPDX</a>: You can still do plenty of damage if you hit something at 10 MPH while not paying attention.  Nothing is important enough to text that one can't wait another few minutes until the car is stopped.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T00:25:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15769045</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15769045" />
    <title>Comment from 2 replies on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>2 replies</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15768690" rel="nofollow">morlo</a>: <br />
On a point-specific-law side-jaunt...<br />
Can I propose we amend the written English language to make it required that the 'y' in 't<b>y</b>ranny' be <b>bolded</b> when used while speaking about gender?<br />
O_o</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T00:24:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15769006</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15769006" />
    <title>Comment from AD8BC on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>AD8BC</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Only text I enter is the password to unlock my Blackberry. Texting is turned off on my company phone though so I never really "text". I can send and receive email but I don't like doing that while driving.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T00:23:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15768690</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15768690" />
    <title>Comment from morlo on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>morlo</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15767895" rel="nofollow">Colonel Jack O'Neill</a>: If a teenager, senior, or woman was driving, they would want those banned too. (Luckily we're getting there in terms of teens and seniors, but too many women vote--tyranny of the majority)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T00:11:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15768645</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15768645" />
    <title>Comment from 2 replies on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>2 replies</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15767860" rel="nofollow">Orv</a>: <br />
That's the only thing keeping me on the fence regarding the issue of officially banning it. Creating a law to cover a technology trend is, imo, asking for trouble.<br />
Laws created are not very easy to repeal, and who's to say that 20 years from now anyone will even be texting anymore?</p>
<p>"Your honor, my client wasn't texting. She was emailing and twittering."</p>
<p>Makes me wonder if there are any stale laws on the books out there about using a pager while driving.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T00:09:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15768607</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15768607" />
    <title>Comment from Orv on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Orv</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15768384" rel="nofollow">2 replies by</a>: Washington state.  The law is that you can only use your horn in an emergency situation.  I've never heard of it being enforced, though.  Many other places (most hilariously, New York City) have similar laws aimed at reducing noise.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T00:08:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15768553</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15768553" />
    <title>Comment from morlo on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>morlo</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15767393" rel="nofollow">keith4298</a>: Yes, when they criminalize sex while driving I will be forced to install a car bomb.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T00:06:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15768531</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15768531" />
    <title>Comment from yevarechecha on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>yevarechecha</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Texting while driving is illegal in my state (MD) as of yesterday. I am all for this. I don't do it myself, but having a friend who rear-ended someone at a light while texting and having nearly been hit on the Beltway by an idiot who was driving with his elbows while typing on his Blackberry, it's long overdue. I think it's even worse than talking on the phone, because you're just as distracted but at least while talking you are looking at the road and not down at the phone.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T00:06:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15768410</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15768410" />
    <title>Comment from michigan2cv on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>michigan2cv</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>It's too dangerous to text while holding a cup of coffee and the morning paper.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T00:02:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15768384</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15768384" />
    <title>Comment from 2 replies on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>2 replies</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15767878" rel="nofollow">Orv</a>: Seriously?<br />
Sounds like someone had a little bit of a power-trip when deciding to make using a common feature on your vehicle illegal.</p>
<p>If you don't mind, whereabouts do you live?<br />
(I try to avoid areas like that like the plague.)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-03T00:00:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15768134</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15768134" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5372937/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving#c15766543" rel="nofollow">MinorAnnoyance</a>: I don't see the logic in being against a ban on texting while driving. This is something that affects everyone. Either you're a driver, a passenger, or a pedestrian who can be affected by this. Texting while driving doesn't benefit anyone, and is an action that can potentially harm a ton of people.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:54:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15768082</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15768082" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5372937/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving#c15767887" rel="nofollow">h3llc4t has a slow work day</a>: On Criminal Minds, they get information and addresses via text all the time.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:52:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767944</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767944" />
    <title>Comment from h3llc4t, breaker of office dress codes on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>h3llc4t, breaker of office dress codes</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15767075" rel="nofollow">Oranges w/ Cheese ontopofBrocolli</a>: I do that. Stop and go traffic is too dangerous for me to text during. I get distracted and would probably end up rear-ending someone at a very slow speed.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:49:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767895</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767895" />
    <title>Comment from Colonel Jack O&apos;Neill on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Colonel Jack O&apos;Neill</name>
        <uri>http://www.mrgpt.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mrgpt.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>I see on a lot of other sites that people are against banning it.<br />
But if these same people who don't like the ban, if someone was doing it and that person got in an accident and they got seriously hurt, or if a texter get in an accident with a family member or loved one, and they got hurt badly or even died, they then would want it banned then.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:47:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767887</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767887" />
    <title>Comment from h3llc4t, breaker of office dress codes on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>h3llc4t, breaker of office dress codes</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15767095" rel="nofollow">2 replies by</a>: If you were investigating a national crime, would you really be doing it via text while driving?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:47:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767878</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767878" />
    <title>Comment from Orv on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Orv</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15767585" rel="nofollow">gStein</a>: Worst part is, where I live, honking your horn in that situation is actually illegal.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:47:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767860</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767860" />
    <title>Comment from Orv on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Orv</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15767393" rel="nofollow">keith4298</a>: I agree.  It astounds me that we need a separate law for this.  What's next, a law against sleeping while driving?  A law against reading the paper while driving?  There are so many stupid things people with no common sense can try that it's silly to try to ban each one individually.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:46:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767703</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767703" />
    <title>Comment from 2 replies on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>2 replies</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15767440" rel="nofollow">Alex Chasick</a>: <br />
Ahh yes. When placed ajacent to the context of the article confusion does ensue. :-p<br />
In that case my vote would have been different.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:42:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767664</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767664" />
    <title>Comment from FaustianSlip on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>FaustianSlip</name>
        <uri>http://www.faustianslip.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.faustianslip.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15766424" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: I agree (despite being a dirty, dirty socialist who think the federal government should be involved in everything), pretty much for the reasons you state here. For consistency's sake, it makes more sense for each state to set their own laws regarding texting while driving, particularly as that precedent has already been set with current laws about talking on your cell while driving.</p>
<p>Incidentally, my state (Maine) recently instituted a "Driving While Distracted" law; it doesn't come right out and ban texting, speaking on the phone or putting on nail polish while you're cruising down the highway, but if you get pulled over for a violation or have an accident while doing any of these things, you'll wind up getting additional charges based on this law. I think that's a pretty reasonable way of handling it, myself, although I still try to refrain from using my cell while I'm on the road, particularly if there are cops around. Just because you <i>can</i> doesn't mean you <i>should</i></p>
<p>In the case of federal employees, I think it's entirely acceptable for their employer (i.e. the gub'mint) to institute policies that disallow texting while behind the wheel when they're on company time. A number of federal positions entail access to a government-owned vehicle, and I'd say that an employee using that vehicle has no business putting both themselves and a car that's not their own in danger because they just have to fire off a text while driving. If it's that critical, pull over and send it. I don't really see this as being any different from, say, a trucking company instituting a policy that their drivers may not text or talk on the phone while driving company-owned vehicles.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:41:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767639</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767639" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5372937/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving#c15767393" rel="nofollow">keith4298</a>: But "unsafe driving" is the umbrella for a huge list of things like speeding to the point of reckless driving, DWIs/DUIs, etc. So the current rules would have to be amended anyway to reflect a ban in texting - adding texting to the current rules or establishing the rule separately from the current one is pretty much the same thing, IMO.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:41:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767593</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767593" />
    <title>Comment from redskull on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>redskull</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15766543" rel="nofollow">MinorAnnoyance</a>: It still boggles my mind that we even have need an anti-texting law. How anyone could think it's OK to type on a tiny keyboard while driving down the road is beyond comprehension.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:40:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767585</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767585" />
    <title>Comment from gStein_*|bringing starpipe back|* on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>gStein_*|bringing starpipe back|*</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/gstein42</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/gstein42">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15766700" rel="nofollow">MercuryPDX</a>: i'll text when i'm stopped, and that's it.<br />
but i've noticed that some people (like the woman in front of me today) will get too involved in their texting, and not notice the light turn green.<br />
(waited about 10 seconds, honked at her, she flipped me the bird.)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:39:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767440</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767440" />
    <title>Comment from Alex Chasick on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alex Chasick</name>
        <uri>http://jalexc.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jalexc.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15767095" rel="nofollow">2 replies by</a>: Oops, guess it was unclear. The poll is meant to ask how, if at all, the general population should be banned from texting while driving. Federal employees should obviously be covered by a federal regulation.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:36:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767393</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767393" />
    <title>Comment from keith4298 on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>keith4298</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm against unnecessary laws.  Unsafe driving is ALREADY illegal.  Just give out the tickets.  We don't need an additional law for every thing that becomes hazardous.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:35:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767260</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767260" />
    <title>Comment from AgentTuttle on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>AgentTuttle</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Talking not hands-free or texting is illegal in California while driving, yet I see cops on the phone while driving all the time. I call BS.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:31:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767254</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767254" />
    <title>Comment from GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>GitEmSteveDave_@Gmail.comNeedsAWaveInvite</name>
        <uri>http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm a pretty good driver, and drive an average of two hours everyday, give or take.  However, yesterday, I was listening, occasionally glancing at my iPod Touch in it's modified cellphone holder level with the dashboard, while listening to "Glee"(Yes, I have been known to strip the audio track from a show/movie, and listen to it if the player didn't have video, and use my imagination/memory to picture it in my mind).</p>
<p>I was so distracted by just doing that extra glancing slightly to the right of my line of sight, that I passed a State Trooper driving in an unmarked car(Crown Vic), and ended up getting pulled over.  I usually spot them 1/2 mile away by their grill pattern from behind me or the car shape from the front.  Long story short, I did my usual announcing every move before I made it, and even though I didn't have current proof of insurance(I received a letter stamped "ID cards enclosed" from Geico a day or two after I paid my policy online, and didn't open it, but threw it in the car, which was lucky.  The letter was postmarked 9/3/09, and the card inside expired 9/9/09.  Since he saw me open it, and saw the postmark date, he told me to print/get a new card, and keep that with me, and let me go with a warning.), he let me go.  But I KNOW it happened because I was trying to multitask, which humans CAN NOT do.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:31:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767096</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767096" />
    <title>Comment from shanchan on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>shanchan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>What affect does this have on liability if a Federal employee causes an accident by texting while driving? Would it make it difficult for a victim of such an accident to recover medical expenses/etc if the worker is violating a work rule?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:27:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767095</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767095" />
    <title>Comment from 2 replies on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>2 replies</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15766424" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: <br />
I'd agree <b>IF</b> this applied to the general public, but as it's only in regards to <i>Federal Employees</i>, then I have to disagree and say that the Federal government should standardize the rules that apply to its employees.</p>
<p>I mean, I for one would be pissed if I were a FBI agent investigating a national crime, and was fired because rather than focusing on my job I had to worry about which state I was in and if I could SMS/MMS.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:27:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15767075</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15767075" />
    <title>Comment from Oranges w/ Cheese on the move on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Oranges w/ Cheese on the move</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15766700" rel="nofollow">MercuryPDX</a>: Same. I'll only text on my phone if I am stopped, at a light or in a parking lot.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:27:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15766837</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15766837" />
    <title>Comment from Kuchen on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kuchen</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15766543" rel="nofollow">MinorAnnoyance</a>:   Agreed.  Indiana recently passed a law making it illegal for drivers under 18 to text while driving.  Why just the teenagers?  Isn't it just as dangerous for other drivers?  I believe this kind of law is also being considered in Minnesota.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:21:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15766747</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15766747" />
    <title>Comment from MercuryPDX on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>MercuryPDX</name>
        <uri>http://MercuryPDX.tumblr.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://MercuryPDX.tumblr.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15766700" rel="nofollow">MercuryPDX</a>: (Whoopsie submit!) If the car is going faster than 10MPH... the phone is put away.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:19:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15766728</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15766728" />
    <title>Comment from MostlyHarmless on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>MostlyHarmless</name>
        <uri>http://www.satyamnayak.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.satyamnayak.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c15766424" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: That makes sense. Also stops people from making lame arguments against it just because it the federal government doing something.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:18:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15766700</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15766700" />
    <title>Comment from MercuryPDX on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>MercuryPDX</name>
        <uri>http://MercuryPDX.tumblr.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://MercuryPDX.tumblr.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I text only when I'm in stop and go traffic. If the car is going faster than 10MPH.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:17:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15766638</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15766638" />
    <title>Comment from maruawe42 on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>maruawe42</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>yes texting should be banned while driving in all places.</p>
<p>But it is not as distracting in a restaurant or a movie..<br />
altho it should be banned in those places as well</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:16:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15766543</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15766543" />
    <title>Comment from MinorAnnoyance on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>MinorAnnoyance</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm amazed at the number of people I see on other sites defending the practice.  Texting while driving has to rank near the top of any list of stupidest things people do.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:14:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937-comment:15766424</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5372937" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/federal-employees-banned-from-texting-while-driving.html#c15766424" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-10-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I think every state should set its own laws because every state has its own laws regarding speeding, DUIs/DWIs, license plates, parking, etc. So why not texting while driving? If this was a federal mandate, it would still have to be adapted to every state's current texting laws, if they have them, and every state would have to re-examine its current rules anyway. So why not cut to the chase and let every state adapt the texting ban to its current set of punishments.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-02T23:11:24Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



