<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T10:40:42Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Energy-Efficient Appliance Rebate Program Still Lacks Catchy Name</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5382656" title="Energy-Efficient Appliance Rebate Program Still Lacks Catchy Name" />
    <published>2009-10-16T21:42:28Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-16T21:50:01Z</updated>
    <title>Energy-Efficient Appliance Rebate Program Still Lacks Catchy Name</title>
    <summary>--&gt;The main problem with the energy-efficient rebate program the federal government has planned is that it just doesn&apos;t have a catchy enough name, editors&apos; and bloggers&apos; efforts notwithstanding. Dollars for Dishwashers? Cash for Kelvinators? Even its official acronym, SEEARP (State Energy Efficient Appliance Rebate Program) isn&apos;t very mellifluous even if you belch it.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Laura Northrup</name>
      <uri>http://www.lauriebird.com/blog</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[
<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/consumerist/2009/10/washer.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />-->The main problem with the energy-efficient rebate program the federal government has planned is that it just doesn't have a catchy enough name, editors' and bloggers' efforts notwithstanding. <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&ved=0CAoQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnbc.com%2Fid%2F32490783&ei=adDXSo_XJYO-lAe-sKmhAQ&usg=AFQjCNHKcZMnZcksCj1BqPKFT-mD9RAMYg&sig2=F5xVFC1HEpct6V0l-JC4nQ">Dollars for Dishwashers?</a> <a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/home/2009/08/federal-rebates-will-cut-costs-of-appliances-this-fall.html?EXTKEY=I91ECON&CMP=OTC-ConsumeristLinks">Cash for Kelvinators?</a> Even its official acronym, SEEARP (<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #stateenergyefficientappliancerebateprogram" href="http://consumerist.comhttp://consumerist.com/tag/stateenergyefficientappliancerebateprogram/">State Energy Efficient Appliance Rebate Program</a>) isn't very mellifluous even if you belch it.</p>
<p>The program, part of the federal <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #economicstimuluspackage" href="http://consumerist.comhttp://consumerist.com/tag/economicstimuluspackage/">economic stimulus package</a>, also has the disadvantage (perhaps) of being administered by individual states, instead of federally. $300 million will be divided up among the 50 states for consumer rebates.</p>
<p>Yesterday was the deadline for states to submit their plans to the federal Department of Energy. If you're going to be in the market for new appliances in the near future, check out the <a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/home/2009/10/cash-for-clunkers-for-appliances-300-million-state-energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-best-ap.html?EXTKEY=I91CONL&CMP=OTC-ConsumeristLinks">Consumer Reports Home FAQ</a> on the program. You might be able to get rid of your energy-wasting appliances as soon as December.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/home/2009/10/cash-for-clunkers-for-appliances-300-million-state-energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-best-ap.html?EXTKEY=I91CONL&CMP=OTC-ConsumeristLinks">Cash for Clunkers for Appliances FAQ</a> [Consumer Reports Home]</p>
<p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/samwilkinson/469559556/">samwilkinson</a>)</p>
]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16084505</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16084505" />
    <title>Comment from legwork on 2009-10-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>legwork</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16075761" rel="nofollow">gStein</a>: Time for a voyage to Craigslist, sir. Spend the $350 you save on something with better gains.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-17T05:54:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16082752</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16082752" />
    <title>Comment from ChuckECheese on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>ChuckECheese</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>This post about catchy names reminds me of a great program name I encountered awhile back.  While a graduate social work intern, I evaluated proposals for a federal urban improvement program that included subsidies for schools to obtain equipment and supplies to do their own projects.</p>
<p>At one private school applicant, located in Ladue, MO, the school's administrators wanted to impress me with their commitment to public service.  They showed me posterboards and photos of their most recent project, which included a number of change cans stationed next to the cash registers in Ladue businesses, with the proceeds of said cans being donated to charity.</p>
<p>Their project was called "pennies for the penniless."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-17T04:16:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16080674</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16080674" />
    <title>Comment from HawkWolf on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>HawkWolf</name>
        <uri>http://www.manachine.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.manachine.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16079273" rel="nofollow">Saboth</a>: I'm worried about the same thing. I'm getting a functional 80's fridge for free from a coworker, for my new house. I'm certain it's not very efficient, although I was surprised to find that it has a 'powered' condenser instead of the passive coils on the back.  If I get some kind of rebate for eventually turning it in, that'll be nice... but the thing I buy to replace it will probably fail within a few months and cost more to repair than it did to buy. Right?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-17T02:43:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16079940</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16079940" />
    <title>Comment from Blueskylaw on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Blueskylaw</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>3D program</p><br />
<p>Dough for Dilapidated Dishwashers</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-17T01:12:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16079402</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16079402" />
    <title>Comment from Skankingmike on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Skankingmike</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>When does China and Japan just stop buying our crap debt?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-17T00:56:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16079273</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16079273" />
    <title>Comment from Saboth on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Saboth</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I'd like new appliances, but I'm afraid of them. After checking out a myriad of them on Consumer reports, along with appliance forums...I just get the impression that older appliances are built a LOT better. For instance...I have a 15+ year fridge that has run great. No repairs/problems. I have an even older dishwasher (now, it doesn't get the dishes spotless, but does an ok job). My oven is also about 15 years old and works fine. I'd like to buy appliances that are more energy efficient, but it seems these $500-2k new fangled appliances just aren't as reliable as the good 'ol days.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-17T00:53:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16078058</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16078058" />
    <title>Comment from qwickone on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>qwickone</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16072602" rel="nofollow">Jon Mason</a>: Clever :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-17T00:21:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16077199</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16077199" />
    <title>Comment from econobiker on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>econobiker</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5382656/energy+efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name#c16072701" rel="nofollow">madanthony</a>: Make sure you watch them disable the old perfectly good ones so that other poorer people cannot use them.</p><br />
<p>My wife's mother has a 1960s era chest freezer that has been leaking its oil for a couple of years. It is the basement and has been shut off for about 3 years - they even got the m-i-l a newer small chest freezer for her kitchen as she doesn't do stairs well now. Probably wait and then trade the monster on a new chest freezer. It probably has more metal content than some of the cars traded under cash for clunkers.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-16T23:56:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16076425</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16076425" />
    <title>Comment from chiieddy on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>chiieddy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>They're just calling it Cash for Clunkers here.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-16T23:35:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16076101</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16076101" />
    <title>Comment from TheFlamingoKing on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>TheFlamingoKing</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>"The program, part of the federal economic stimulus package, also has the disadvantage (perhaps) of being administered by individual states, instead of federally."</p>
<p>Bias. Could you maybe cite some facts or research about why a program administered at the state level will automatically be worse than one administered at the federal level? No, you can't - you just want to reinforce your stereotype that only the federal government can administer programs.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-16T23:26:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16075761</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16075761" />
    <title>Comment from gStein_*|bringing starpipe back|* on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>gStein_*|bringing starpipe back|*</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/gstein42</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/gstein42">
        <![CDATA[<p>why is this so difficult to divide up?<br />
$300 million... we have just over 300 million people in this country...<br />
just give each person $1 and be done with it!</p>
<p>all joking aside, we NEED a new dryer... it's getting louder, you can hear the drum hitting the sheet metal...<br />
if you stop it mid-cycle, it won't restart until it's cooled down again. (i think the thermostat has gone bad, among other things)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-16T23:16:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16074955</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16074955" />
    <title>Comment from morlo on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>morlo</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>FUBAR: Federal Unearned Bailout Appliance Rebate</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-16T22:55:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16073920</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16073920" />
    <title>Comment from TCama on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>TCama</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16073796" rel="nofollow">TCama</a>: Oh there it is. Nice. Wasn't there before. Edit comment feature anyone?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-16T22:27:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16073848</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16073848" />
    <title>Comment from Applekid on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Applekid</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Heh... I bought a house a few months before the $8000 in free money, I bought a car a few months before before the Cash for Clunkers, I bought new appliances a few months before hearing about this.</p>
<p>Reminds me of my social life.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-16T22:25:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16073796</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16073796" />
    <title>Comment from TCama on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>TCama</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Huh. My last comment disappeared somehow.</p>
<p>Here are my ideas:</p>
<p>- Money for Machines<br />
- Dineros for Devices<br />
- Greenbacks for Gadgets<br />
- Greenbacks for Gizmos<br />
- Cash for Contraptions<br />
- Wealth for Widgets<br />
- Wherewithall for Whatchamacallits</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-16T22:24:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16073570</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16073570" />
    <title>Comment from TCama on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>TCama</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The acronym almost sounds like "syrup." Almost.</p>
<p>Here are some ideas:</p>
<p>- Money for Machines<br />
- Greenbacks for Gadgets<br />
- Cash for Contraptions<br />
- Dineros for Devices<br />
- Wealth for Widgets<br />
- Wherewithall for Whatchamacallits</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-16T22:17:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16073099</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16073099" />
    <title>Comment from Eyebrows McGee (now with more baby!) on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Eyebrows McGee (now with more baby!)</name>
        <uri>http://eyebrowsmcgee.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://eyebrowsmcgee.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c16072602" rel="nofollow">masonreloaded</a>: nice!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-16T22:04:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16072701</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16072701" />
    <title>Comment from madanthony on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>madanthony</name>
        <uri>http://www.madanthony.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.madanthony.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sweet.  Time to pull out and throw waway all my perfectly good, nearly new basic white appliances and trade them in for shiny stainless steel ones - and make future generations pay for it!  That will save the earth!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-16T21:54:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656-comment:16072602</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5382656" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/10/energy-efficient-appliance-rebate-program-still-lacks-catchy-name.html#c16072602" />
    <title>Comment from Jon Mason on 2009-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jon Mason</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>They should call it the "Greenback" program. As in, go green and get some greenbacks back...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-16T21:51:33Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



