<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T11:21:43Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for The Consumerist Comments Code</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5021861" title="The Consumerist Comments Code" />
    <published>2009-08-21T21:00:51Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-16T18:33:39Z</updated>
    <title>The Consumerist Comments Code</title>
    <summary>The Consumerist Comments Code, which we repost every now and again, is intended to promote a discussion filled with substantive information, insights, humorous observations and relevant personal experiences. In other words, comments that other people would want to read. Here are some rules to help make this possible... (And while we&apos;re on the topic of commenters, don&apos;t forget to add your email address to your user profile by going to http://consumerist.com/people/yourscreenname/profile/ so you can  keep your commenter profile when we transition to a new platform this Fall)</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Ben Popken</name>
      <uri>http://www.consumerist.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>The Consumerist Comments Code, which we repost every now and again, is intended to promote a discussion filled with substantive information, insights, humorous observations and relevant personal experiences. In other words, comments that other people would want to read. Here are some rules to help make this possible... (And while we're on the topic of commenters, don't forget to add your email address to your user profile by going to http://consumerist.com/people/yourscreenname/profile/ so you can  keep your commenter profile when we transition to a new platform this Fall)</p>
]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><strong></p>
<h2>CONSUMERIST COMMENTS CODE</h2>
<p></strong></p>
<p>Above all, don't be a jerk and don't be boring. Ask yourself, is my comment boring, repetitive, or not substantively contributing to an engaging discussion? If you can answer yes, don't hit submit.</p>
<p><strong>No junk comments</strong><br   /><br />
Your comment should be a meaningful response to the issue raised in the post. Take some time when writing a comment, it's not a race and you don't have an edit button. Objections to an editor's headlines or writing style or a post's entire existence should be emailed directly to the post's author. Verboten: "+1" "Why is this on Consumerist?", "tldr", "Why did they even shop there in the first place?", "This is a non-issue", "Slow news day?" "Pwnd" "Yawn", "First", "People still ______" (use dialup, eat fast food, breathe air, and so forth), "Old news", "lol", "This is why I don't shop there," etc.</p>
<p><strong>Stay on topic</strong><br   /><br />
Read the full post before commenting. We highly advise reading linked articles before commenting as well. Avoid tangential political rants or partisan diatribes.</p>
<p><strong>Read other people's comments before posting</strong><br />
See what's already been said before adding your piece. If you just skim to the end and make your response, chances are you may end up repeating what's already been said in the conversation. The comments should be a dialog between commenters, not just the place where your arrows affixed with your messages that you blindly shoot in happen to land.</p>
<p><strong>Avoid blaming the poster or victim or commenting only to be negative</strong><br   /><br />
Please, suggest alternate courses of action, or add important information that might help others or that we missed. Don't attack people. Assume good faith. Tipsters need help, not ridicule. Express contrary opinions, but treat others as you would like to be treated. Don't constantly spew negativity, be it about other posters, the site, the article, or anything. Commenting is a privilege, and can be removed at any time at our discretion.</p>
<p><strong>No sexism, racism, homophobia, xenophobia or hatred</strong><br   /><br />
Don't put this crap in our comments. Don't post links to hate, porn, spam, or shock sites, or their ilk.</p>
<p><strong>No flame wars</strong><br   /><br />
A bunch of screaming strangers? Boring! Keep cursing to a minimum. Debate the idea, not the person. Pointing out other commenters spelling or grammatical errors is not a productive exercise.</p>
<p><strong>Make it readable</strong><br   /><br />
Go easy on the caps and exclamation points.</p>
<p><strong>Send your copyedits to the top</strong><br   /><br />
The quickest way to get grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors fixed is to email the author and/or site editor directly.</p>
<p><strong>No sockpuppets</strong><br   /><br />
If you post about a company you work for, or pays you in some way, you must disclose this relationship in your comment.</p>
<p><strong>Don't tell people how to break the law</strong><br />
Providing instructions on how to commit criminal acts is not ok.</p>
<p><strong>Commenters are not moderators</strong><br   /><br />
If you see a commenter violating these rules, email moderator@consumerist.com. Posting only to point out someone is breaking the rules is distracting and unnecessary. So no rules lawyering or "junior moderating" in the threads. Don't try to argue the fine points of how your comments are just within the rules. Always post with the spirit of the comments code and not just its letter.</p>
<p><strong>What happens if I break these rules?</strong><br   /><br />
You may be banned, or, perhaps worse, "disemvoweled." We might warn you in the comments. We also might not. If you ignore a warning, you will probably be banned. If you feel your ban is unwarranted, email your appeal to moderator@consumerist.com and we'll see if we can work it out.</p>
<p><strong>What's "Disemvoweling?"</strong><br />
It's when a moderator removes all the vowels from your comment, making it very hard to read. This is when you've said something out of line that doesn't warrant a ban, but we just don't want to have to see it or subject others to it. If you get disemvoweled, consider it a warning that a ban may be imminent.
</p></p>
]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:20032526</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c20032526" />
    <title>Comment from jacobs cows  on 2009-12-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>jacobs cows </name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Letter BACK FROM Ceo of Cracker Barrel after asking them why so much Communist Chinese merchandise in their retail store when they go out of their way to be the All American Experience.Has anyone else gotten this same form letter back from them?</p>

<p>Dear Ms,<br />
Thank you for telling me of your concerns regarding our retail products,<br />
and for sharing your guidance to focus more on sourcing product that is<br />
"Made in America." Your assessment of how we present the Cracker Barrel<br />
brand is astute. We do, indeed, strive to provide a friendly<br />
home-away-from-home in our old country store and restaurant, and to<br />
offer a great Cracker Barrel experience that includes real home-style<br />
food and shopping that's surprisingly unique, genuinely fun and<br />
reminiscent of America's country heritage, all at a fair price.</p>

<p>While your recent review of the merchandise available in our retail<br />
store gave you pause, please know that we have had many internal<br />
discussions on this matter and are always looking for new vendors who<br />
can provide the variety, value and quantity of products our guests<br />
expect. Our merchandising department is keenly aware of the points you<br />
made in your message to me because this is a very important area of<br />
consideration. Things they keep in mind as they do vendor reviews<br />
include whether a vendor can provide the quantity needed to properly<br />
stock all of our stores, and whether the vendor is actually the<br />
manufacturer or simply another distributor of goods that are made<br />
overseas. The global nature of modern business means that more research<br />
than ever is needed to ensure clarity on what a company is getting and<br />
from where it is coming.</p>

<p>I have given clear direction to our merchandising team that Cracker<br />
Barrel is to support American-made production wherever possible if<br />
particular vendors can meet our cost, quality, quantity, and margin<br />
specifications. While there are no simple answers, I do share your<br />
concern about remaining true to our history. And, indeed, Cracker Barrel<br />
has a long history of working with American vendors: our sock monkeys<br />
come from a company in the foothills of the Adirondacks; our peg games<br />
are made here in Lebanon, TN; our chocolate and peanut butter buckeyes<br />
come from Ohio; most of our candles are American-made; our Lodge cast<br />
iron products come from South Pittsburg, TN; our rocking chairs - one of<br />
our best-selling items- are made in Springfield, TN; and most of the<br />
candies we sell are made in the United States. Many of these vendors<br />
have been with us for a very long time.</p>

<p>We both know that Cracker Barrel is a very special place and<br />
experience, and I appreciate your interest in keeping it that way; I<br />
assure you that I will remain true to the brand. Again, I appreciate<br />
your comments and hope you know that we are trying to meet your<br />
expectations as we balance the different aspects of the situation.</p>

<p>Sincerely,</p>

<p>Mike Woodhouse</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-12-24T16:21:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:15643180</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c15643180" />
    <title>Comment from feralmusic on 2009-09-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>feralmusic</name>
        <uri>http://www.youtube.com/user/feralmusic</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.youtube.com/user/feralmusic">
        <![CDATA[<p>No doubt, times are hard... especially for artists.   They get beaten down on a daily basis.  I was at a nearby rehearsal studio (half empty) and was listening to one of the bands.  Later they told me their band name was Cold Yard when i met them after they were done, and they had a CD on I-Tunes.  Like the Foo Fighters meet the Beatles.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-09-28T07:35:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:15175515</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c15175515" />
    <title>Comment from fusilier on 2009-09-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>fusilier</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Why do my comments not show up? There's nothing flaming about them and I've been a member for awhile, but when I post I just get a dashed red border around my comment and it never goes through. :(</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-09-03T22:16:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14938183</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14938183" />
    <title>Comment from RogerTheAlien on 2009-08-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>RogerTheAlien</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5021861/the-consumerist-comments-code#c14922147" rel="nofollow">wvFrugan</a>: I know what you mean. While never having been "disemvoweled" myself (though that's coolest term ever), I find that the Moderators-That-Be can be kind of biased. Not only politically - though politics should be relevant to the post, not the commenter - but on what constitutes a violation of the commenting code. I've seen things that I would think would be disemvoweled ASAP, then the next post I read will be disemvoweled. And since you can clearly read what the commenter was saying, I won't understand what the big deal was to get them in trouble. It's nice to see there IS some sort of rough baseline that is supposedly followed. Now if it was just adhered to.@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5021861/the-consumerist-comments-code#c14921300" rel="nofollow">Consumerist-Moderator-Roz</a>: @<a href="http://consumerist.com/5021861/the-consumerist-comments-code#c14922147" rel="nofollow">wvFrugan</a>:</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-23T12:52:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14934199</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14934199" />
    <title>Comment from eggman131 on 2009-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>eggman131</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Guilty as charged. All great points and--seriously--I was unaware of my transgressions until now. Posting this code really helped me--as a new reader/commenter I had no clue.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-23T03:51:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14933063</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14933063" />
    <title>Comment from Pasketti on 2009-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Pasketti</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have my own personal comments code:</p>
<p>1. Try to be interesting.</p>
<p>2. If you can't be interesting, be funny.</p>
<p>3. Don't be a jerk.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-23T02:19:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14925905</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14925905" />
    <title>Comment from catastrophegirl on 2009-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>catastrophegirl</name>
        <uri>http://www.catastrophegirl.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.catastrophegirl.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>thanks for the reminder. i know i've been getting off topic lately...  kitty pictures are too tempting not to talk about for me. sorry</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T07:49:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14925733</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14925733" />
    <title>Comment from julieannie on 2009-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>julieannie</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Interesting that you say you don't allow sexism, yet in a post where a sex worker was raped, moderators responded to concerned emails implying she deserved what she got. Way to keep it clean.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T07:35:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14924960</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14924960" />
    <title>Comment from silver-bolt on 2009-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>silver-bolt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14923965" rel="nofollow">witeowl</a>: lol +1</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T06:16:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14923965</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14923965" />
    <title>Comment from witeowl on 2009-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>witeowl</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14921810" rel="nofollow">MauriceCallidice</a>: You know, really, this is all their own fault for allowing comments in the first place.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T05:07:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14922668</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14922668" />
    <title>Comment from mizmoose on 2009-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>mizmoose</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>"No sexism, racism, homophobia, xenophobia or hatred</p>
<p>Don't put this crap in our comments."</p>
<p>So when will Consumerist.com stop with allowing people to refer to fat people as "fatty" and allowing talk that shows bigotry towards fat people or encourages same.</p>
<p>Oh, wait, that'd have to happen after the posts themselves stop doing it.</p>
<p>Clean up your own house, Consumerist.  You set the tone for this place, set a better example.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T03:46:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14922147</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14922147" />
    <title>Comment from wvFrugan on 2009-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>wvFrugan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c14918735" rel="nofollow">DivineBrevity</a>: <br />Yes, I was glad to see this too. If you get disemvowelled, how do you know other to look back to see if its happened? Just wondering since that is sort of a warning. I ask because I sometimes wonder if something that I've said could fall under "hatred" or "flaming": I hate intolerant people, as well as brain dead corporate sycophants, and sometimes a few commenters are so full of it that responses can seem like a personal attack even with challenging specific points.</p><br />
<p>I got a permanent vacation from eBay's forums for calling people out on clearly racist and homophobic crap. On those forums, you can say anything just about as long as it sounds pretty. Funny, I recycled a comment I had read here and that was the final straw that got me booted: remember the Burger King sign that denied climate change and the comment suggesting it just as well might have said "married queers are coming to take your guns"? That was it. Thanks to my friend sarcasm, I have no other friends!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T03:17:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14921810</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14921810" />
    <title>Comment from MauriceCallidice on 2009-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>MauriceCallidice</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14918582" rel="nofollow">h3llc4t</a>: This is why I don't comment.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T03:00:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14921691</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14921691" />
    <title>Comment from GitEmSteveDave:WalkinOnSunshine on 2009-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>GitEmSteveDave:WalkinOnSunshine</name>
        <uri>http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14921404" rel="nofollow">SnowingCookies</a>: This should work for awhile.  OK everyone, this case is closed for now.  Please read Roz's post below, and lets keep this on topic from now on.  If we do that, nothing can possibli go wrong.</p>
<p>Huh, that's the first thing that's ever gone wrong....</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T02:54:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14921404</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14921404" />
    <title>Comment from Sarah Black on 2009-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sarah Black</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14921272" rel="nofollow">GitEmSteveDave:WalkinOnSunshine</a>: Thanks GitEmSteveDave - it does work on all the Gawker sites, no problems there. Though, through the Consumerist.com page links given in the previous articles and at the top of the page, it is a no-go/show-stopper.</p>
<p>If the Gawker pages update the Consumerist data as well, then solution found and problem solved. Thanks for the heads-up!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T02:41:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14921300</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14921300" />
    <title>Comment from Consumerist-Moderator-Roz on 2009-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Consumerist-Moderator-Roz</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, let's keep comments here focused on questions on the code and such.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T02:37:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14921272</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14921272" />
    <title>Comment from GitEmSteveDave:WalkinOnSunshine on 2009-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>GitEmSteveDave:WalkinOnSunshine</name>
        <uri>http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gitemstevedave4.mybrute.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14920387" rel="nofollow">SnowingCookies</a>: Yup, just tried it.  Seems to be working fine.  Here's a link for you: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/people/SnowingCookies/" rel="nofollow">[gizmodo.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T02:36:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14921039</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14921039" />
    <title>Comment from Smashville_OrderingOJandTakingNames on 2009-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Smashville_OrderingOJandTakingNames</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5021861/the-consumerist-comments-code#c14919823" rel="nofollow">MostlyHarmless</a>: People still comment?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T02:25:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14920387</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14920387" />
    <title>Comment from Sarah Black on 2009-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sarah Black</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>Can anyone else get to the user profile page? I have been trying for several months, using both FireFox and InternetExplorer on Vista &amp; Windows7 with no luck. I click the "profile" link and just get "waiting for..." at the bottom of the page for several seconds and then nothing happens. I dont have any problems at other websites. I've also tried this on a WindowsMobile and Android, same results.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T01:57:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14919823</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14919823" />
    <title>Comment from MostlyHarmless on 2009-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>MostlyHarmless</name>
        <uri>http://www.satyamnayak.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.satyamnayak.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14919263" rel="nofollow">squinko</a>: I do all my commenting by myself.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T01:36:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14919263</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14919263" />
    <title>Comment from squinko on 2009-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>squinko</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14918582" rel="nofollow">h3llc4t</a>: Why is this even on Consumerist?! This clearly has nothing to do with consumerism.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T01:14:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14919037</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14919037" />
    <title>Comment from HogwartsAlum on 2009-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>HogwartsAlum</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>"disemoveled."  That was funny because  I'm having one of those days and earlier I was trying to type "BILL" and I typed "BULL."  That looks like something I would have done.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T01:06:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14918735</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14918735" />
    <title>Comment from DivineBrevity on 2009-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>DivineBrevity</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I'm glad to see this. I've been on here for a while now (maybe a year) and didn't even know this guide was out there. A general "help" link/section would be nice, too, but props for writing a guide!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T00:56:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861-comment:14918582</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5021861" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/08/the-consumerist-comments-code.html#c14918582" />
    <title>Comment from h3llc4t, breaker of office dress codes on 2009-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>h3llc4t, breaker of office dress codes</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>slw nws dy?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-22T00:51:18Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



