<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T11:46:05Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Pepsi VS Coke Logo Evolution</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5325047" title="Pepsi VS Coke Logo Evolution" />
    <published>2009-07-29T05:38:02Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-29T05:43:13Z</updated>
    <title>Pepsi VS Coke Logo Evolution</title>
    <summary>--&gt;Some mystery genius put together a comparison of the logo evolution of Pepsi Vs. Coke. Enjoy.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Meg Marco</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[
<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/31/2009/07/thumb160x_cfd328931ae4b688e4e5d6b843f85a0b.jpg" class="left image158" width="158">-->Some mystery genius put together a comparison of the logo evolution of Pepsi Vs. Coke. Enjoy.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/consumerist/2009/07/pepsivscoke.jpg"><img src="http://consumerist.com/images/31/2009/07/504x_pepsivscoke.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a><br>
<br clear="all"></p>
<p>Someone in the Digg comments posted a look at the <a href="http://cocacolaloft.blogspot.com/2006/04/coca-cola-script-trademarklogo.html">actual subtle evolution of the Coke logo</a>, but, you know, it's funnier without it.<br>
[<a href="http://digg.com/food_drink/Pepsi_vs_Coca_Cola_Logo_Evolution">Via Digg</a>]</p>
]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14585117</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14585117" />
    <title>Comment from cartagenero on 2009-08-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>cartagenero</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is great, great logos don't go anywhere.!!!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-05T01:40:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14556816</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14556816" />
    <title>Comment from Chizzer on 2009-08-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chizzer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14507618" rel="nofollow">danno5-0</a>: Wow. I've seen countless console fanboys, but you might be the first cola fanboy I've ever seen online.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-01T19:38:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14556784</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14556784" />
    <title>Comment from Chizzer on 2009-08-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chizzer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14556772" rel="nofollow">Chizzer</a>:</p>
<p>Oops. Repost, apparently, from Englishee Teacher.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-01T19:30:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14556772</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14556772" />
    <title>Comment from Chizzer on 2009-08-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chizzer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>After seeing it in print over and over on that chart, the word "Pepsi" now just looks extremely weird to me.</p>
<p>Does this happen to anyone else when they see/say a word repeatedly?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-01T19:28:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14550759</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14550759" />
    <title>Comment from Munchtime on 2009-07-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Munchtime</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14483712" rel="nofollow">Coop</a>: I want to say it was Total Recall that had that logo.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-01T03:16:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14549749</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14549749" />
    <title>Comment from halah on 2009-07-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>halah</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14501227" rel="nofollow">darkmoonz</a>: Ever have a Cheerwine float?  One of those babies will convince the stoutest disbeliever of the presence of a god.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-01T02:21:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14546853</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14546853" />
    <title>Comment from ironchef on 2009-07-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>ironchef</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>2008 logo looks fugly.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-08-01T00:31:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14534784</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14534784" />
    <title>Comment from Aaronjk on 2009-07-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Aaronjk</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482023" rel="nofollow">SpruceStreetPhil</a>: <br />
The strange thing about Pepsi Max and Diet Pepsi,if you look at the ingredients, they're the same.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-31T11:55:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14523819</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14523819" />
    <title>Comment from PsiCop on 2009-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>PsiCop</name>
        <uri>http://www.agnostic-library.com/ma/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.agnostic-library.com/ma/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14512144" rel="nofollow">zekebullseye</a>: I don't think they did it on purpose, either. And Snopes, for one, agrees with that assessment (<a href="http://www.snopes.com/cokelore/newcoke.asp" rel="nofollow">[www.snopes.com]</a>).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-31T00:28:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14512144</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14512144" />
    <title>Comment from zekebullseye on 2009-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>zekebullseye</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482841" rel="nofollow">PsiCop</a>: <br />
Yeah, I remember that debacle.  I was so happy to see old Coke back.  "New Coke" was nasty-tasting.  Paradoxically, that event may have been the most brilliant promotional campaign ever.  Except I don't think they did it on purpose.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T15:35:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14509725</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14509725" />
    <title>Comment from Ayumi~n on 2009-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ayumi~n</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/ayumiin</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/ayumiin">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14485207" rel="nofollow">SenorDoucheoisie</a>: That would be quite extensive and then depressing when you get to today's "Mtn Dew." They really should just go ahead and shorten it to Dew and get it over with.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T09:30:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14507618</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14507618" />
    <title>Comment from danno5-0 on 2009-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>danno5-0</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Coke is the best!  Pepsi is a cheap imitator who has to reinvent its self every now and then--except for the 'New Coke' debacle; for which, Coke has hopefully learned its lesson.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T07:19:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14507101</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14507101" />
    <title>Comment from Baronzemo on 2009-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Baronzemo</name>
        <uri>http://www.fark.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.fark.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14483712" rel="nofollow">Coop</a>:</p>
<p>Son't you mean Pepsi Perfect?<br />
<a href="http://www.ketzer.com/backtothefuture/bttf2_pepsi_perfect.html" rel="nofollow">[www.ketzer.com]</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ketzer.com/backtothefuture/diet_pepsi.html" rel="nofollow">[www.ketzer.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T06:56:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14504616</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14504616" />
    <title>Comment from HeartBurnKid: Agent of R.O.A.C.H. on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>HeartBurnKid: Agent of R.O.A.C.H.</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14483569" rel="nofollow">TeeArr</a>: OBULLMA!</p>
<p>*chug*</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T04:22:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14501227</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14501227" />
    <title>Comment from darkmoonz on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>darkmoonz</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14488371" rel="nofollow">Hil-fish</a>: mmm, Cheerwine...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T01:49:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14500230</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14500230" />
    <title>Comment from Tom_Servo on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tom_Servo</name>
        <uri>http://www.jagassery.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jagassery.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>What about about 'New Coke' when the cans just said 'Coke' and not Coca-Cola?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T01:14:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14499970</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14499970" />
    <title>Comment from RobertBaron on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>RobertBaron</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14484003" rel="nofollow">pockygt</a>:</p>
<p>Holy crap.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T01:06:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14499307</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14499307" />
    <title>Comment from PsiCop on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>PsiCop</name>
        <uri>http://www.agnostic-library.com/ma/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.agnostic-library.com/ma/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14491947" rel="nofollow">strandist</a>: ... or news anchors on the major networks interrupting normal programming to report that Coca-Colo was putting "old Coke" back on the market as "Coca-Cola Classic."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T00:41:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14499028</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14499028" />
    <title>Comment from DePaulBlueDemon on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>DePaulBlueDemon</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14487501" rel="nofollow">zibby</a>:</p>
<p>Pepsi was even giving out free loot at Obama's inauguration.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T00:30:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14496318</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14496318" />
    <title>Comment from Enduro on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Enduro</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think the 60's-70's Pepsi logo is the best of the bunch.  I think they'll eventually bring that back (at least they should).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T22:58:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14495478</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14495478" />
    <title>Comment from morlo on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>morlo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I never noticed the sexual flourish in the Coke logo before</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T22:32:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14494968</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14494968" />
    <title>Comment from midwestkel on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>midwestkel</name>
        <uri>http://www.kellykarnetsky.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kellykarnetsky.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482435" rel="nofollow">therethinker</a>: Yea but they are obviously Pepsi haters since why they say is untrue since the Coca-Cola logo has changed over time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T22:17:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14491947</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14491947" />
    <title>Comment from strandist on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>strandist</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482841" rel="nofollow">PsiCop</a>: I was totally thinking the same thing.  Pepsi may have changed their logo, but they have never (as far as I know) changed their formula to the point that there were protests outside their headquarters.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T20:38:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14491859</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14491859" />
    <title>Comment from bbagdan on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>bbagdan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, when you're the market leader, why change anything? When you're second place, you try and try anything to claw at a few percentage points of market share.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T20:35:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14491216</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14491216" />
    <title>Comment from veg-o-matic on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>veg-o-matic</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482634" rel="nofollow">Bs Baldwin</a>: Hey, the Helvetica Scenario is dangerous stuff.  Don't fool yourself.<br />
<a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T20:11:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14491116</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14491116" />
    <title>Comment from veg-o-matic on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>veg-o-matic</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482160" rel="nofollow">supercereal</a>: Yeah, but keep in mind that in 1898, having a 3rd grade education was like having a SuperPhD.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T20:07:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14490883</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14490883" />
    <title>Comment from joe18521 on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>joe18521</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14488994" rel="nofollow">vastrightwing</a>:</p>
<p>That 1940 Pepsi logo was a complete and utter rip off of the Coke logo.  It is impossible to deny or defend that notion.</p>
<p>The current logo is find, the font face is a bit childish though.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T19:58:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14490271</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14490271" />
    <title>Comment from Shoney77 on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shoney77</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't know how people can drink Pepsi.  Too sweet and it doesn't have that strong carbonation that a can of coke has.</p>
<p>I'd have to punch myself if i ever ordered a jack and pepsi at the bar.  Just doesn't sound right.</p>
<p>Come to think of it, I dont know anyone that drinks Pepsi.<br />
How do they stay in business?? Probably by selling Tacos and Fried Chicken.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T19:36:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14489292</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14489292" />
    <title>Comment from Five on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Five</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14487247" rel="nofollow">texmandie</a>: One million at least, or so I've heard.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T19:03:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14489211</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14489211" />
    <title>Comment from Five on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Five</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14484608" rel="nofollow">courtarro</a>: I think he means "hallucinogens".</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T19:00:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14488994</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14488994" />
    <title>Comment from vastrightwing on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>vastrightwing</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482879" rel="nofollow">Kllian</a>: Perhaps, but the variations were very subtle and the main feature of the logo has stayed in tact. From a marketing perspective, the Coca Cola logo is much superior to all of the Pepsi Logos. In my option, the 1940 Pepsi logo was the best and they should go back to that one. On the other hand, I wouldn't have minded being the agency morphing the logos and making a ton of cash each time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T18:52:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14488942</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14488942" />
    <title>Comment from JustinSane07 on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>JustinSane07</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>CM Punk approves of Pepsi 1998.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T18:50:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14488535</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14488535" />
    <title>Comment from ElizabethD on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>ElizabethD</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>IMO as a publications person, Pepsi got the logo right c. 1940-50. They should have stopped there. It's like poor Michael Jackson's face: fairly early on in his plastic surgery adventures, he looked great. You gotta know when to STOP.</p>
<p>OTOH, I am a Coke drinker. So what do I care?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T18:33:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14488371</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14488371" />
    <title>Comment from Hil-fish on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Hil-fish</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482023" rel="nofollow">SpruceStreetPhil</a>: What, no Cheerwine?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T18:27:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14488149</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14488149" />
    <title>Comment from Biggbrother on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Biggbrother</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>No Nuka-Cola comparison? Shucks...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T18:14:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14487799</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14487799" />
    <title>Comment from AreYouConfusedYet?HowAboutNow? on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>AreYouConfusedYet?HowAboutNow?</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14483715" rel="nofollow">enthreeoh</a>: Here, let me embed that for you.</p>
<p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T17:45:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14487785</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14487785" />
    <title>Comment from AreYouConfusedYet?HowAboutNow? on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>AreYouConfusedYet?HowAboutNow?</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482031" rel="nofollow">Wombatish</a>: Did you know Pepsi has its own orbit?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T17:44:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14487600</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14487600" />
    <title>Comment from dotphildot on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>dotphildot</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/dotphil</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/dotphil">
        <![CDATA[<p>Everything was better in 1940... except for that coke logo</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T17:27:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14487524</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14487524" />
    <title>Comment from jmujeff on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>jmujeff</name>
        <uri>http://www.lewisweb.ws</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lewisweb.ws">
        <![CDATA[<p>Pepsi should have stopped with 1973. It was all downhill from there.</p>
<p>Should also bring back Crystal Pepsi!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T17:19:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14487501</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14487501" />
    <title>Comment from zibby on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>zibby</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5325047/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution#c14486008" rel="nofollow">Spinfusor</a>: Definitely. In fact, the Obama logo bears a more-than-passing resemblence to the old Pepsi logo. He's the Pepsi president for the Pepsi Generation.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T17:16:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14487247</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14487247" />
    <title>Comment from texmandie on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>texmandie</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5325047/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution#c14484003" rel="nofollow">pockygt</a>: Wow. It's kind of like reading the Time Cube site. How much did they pay for all that?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T16:36:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14487243</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14487243" />
    <title>Comment from U-235 on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>U-235</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5325047/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution#c14482023" rel="nofollow">SpruceStreetPhil</a>: Mmmm. RC Cola and Moonpies. The normal kind. Not that Doublestack Moonpie garbage.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T16:35:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14486724</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14486724" />
    <title>Comment from kcvaliant on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>kcvaliant</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14485767" rel="nofollow">reynwrap582</a>:</p>
<p>But if it works it works. The average person is a retard.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T14:12:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14486259</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14486259" />
    <title>Comment from EdenBabararacucudada on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>EdenBabararacucudada</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>what about the "Always" logo, or "COKE"?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T12:39:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14486122</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14486122" />
    <title>Comment from JackieEggs on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>JackieEggs</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Anyone seen the aluminum bottles of Pepsi? They have catchy phrases like " LOL" on the side...</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T12:06:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14486097</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14486097" />
    <title>Comment from Englishee Teacher on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Englishee Teacher</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>The word Pepsi has now lost all meaning to me... pepsi pepsi pepsi pepsipepsipepsi</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T12:02:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14486008</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14486008" />
    <title>Comment from Spinfusor on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Spinfusor</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482066" rel="nofollow">H3ion</a>: The new Pepsi logo looks a lot more like the old Pepsi logo than the Obama logo.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T11:47:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14485767</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14485767" />
    <title>Comment from reynwrap582 on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>reynwrap582</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482300" rel="nofollow">Robobot</a>: I watched the inauguration on CNN and Pepsi ran a bunch of commercials that, I swear, I thought were from the Obama campaign... which I thought was very strange until I realized it was from Pepsi, and then I just felt disgusted.  Especially because it was blatantly targeted at the African-American and minority populations that were overwhelmingly featured in the ad.  Someone at Pepsi thought they were a marketing genius, I just thought they were manipulative sleezebags stopping at nothing to squeeze every cent out of a major historical event.  My wife and I were sitting there watching it and thinking "Aww, isn't this a nice little montage about America" that maybe CNN or someone put together, then a logo comes up that looks an awful lot like Obama's logo, and then PEPSI for 1/2 second...  F#$&amp; YOU PEPSI, HOW STUPID DO YOU THINK PEOPLE ARE?</p>
<p>I'm also pissed off at the commercials recently featuring JFK's moon speech, which turns out to just be selling an overpriced novelty watch.</p>
<p>I'm pissed off at a lot of things.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T11:09:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14485207</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14485207" />
    <title>Comment from SenorDoucheoisie on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>SenorDoucheoisie</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Now we need an timeline for the evolution of Mountain Dew's logo.  That thing changes nearly every season.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T09:58:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14485163</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14485163" />
    <title>Comment from AngryK9 on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>AngryK9</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5325047/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution#c14483569" rel="nofollow">TeeArr</a>: <a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.brogan.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/obama-pepsi.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.brogan.com/blog/did-pepsi-rip-off-the-obama-logo/&amp;usg=__2hu2uN7mInI2A8x8hw-KYkEQlGc=&amp;h=300&amp;w=500&amp;sz=75&amp;hl=en&amp;start=17&amp;um=1&amp;tbnid=sCqZ9efUEFnfUM:&amp;tbnh=78&amp;tbnw=130&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dobama%2527s%2Blogo%26hl%3Den%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:*%26sa%3DN%26um%3D1" rel="nofollow">[images.google.com]</a></p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T09:53:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14484905</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14484905" />
    <title>Comment from Lincolnsbeard33 on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lincolnsbeard33</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14483411" rel="nofollow">UppityDragon</a>: really?  have you seen the billboards they had up?  The ones that have the pepsi logo and say HOPE.</p>
<p>let me see if this will link  <a href="http://brain-terminal.com/common/images.php/hope-pepsi.jpg" rel="nofollow">[brain-terminal.com]</a></p>
<p>well if you don't want to click on it just type in pepsi hope in google.</p>
<p>You would have to be blind not to see they are trying to make their logo look like Obamas Logo.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T09:25:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14484878</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14484878" />
    <title>Comment from Sherlock Homo on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sherlock Homo</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I hated the 2005 logo.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T09:21:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14484608</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14484608" />
    <title>Comment from courtarro on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>courtarro</name>
        <uri>http://www.hydrous.net/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hydrous.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482634" rel="nofollow">Bs Baldwin</a>: That's definitely not Helvetica. Or were you talking about something else?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T08:59:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14484533</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14484533" />
    <title>Comment from Eyebrows McGee (now with more baby!) on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Eyebrows McGee (now with more baby!)</name>
        <uri>http://eyebrowsmcgee.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://eyebrowsmcgee.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>That Coca-Cola logo really is a classic ... it's like the little black dress of advertising logos.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T08:54:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14484521</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14484521" />
    <title>Comment from bainelaker on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>bainelaker</name>
        <uri>http://www.thomasapartment.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thomasapartment.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14484044" rel="nofollow">albear</a>:</p>
<p>Yeah. I vividly remember the "Top Gun" style ad around the time the logo changed.. with the "maverick" pilot pulling an ice cold Pepsi from some magical console in his fighter jet. Good choice.</p>
<p>And it's the choice of a new generation.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T08:53:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14484044</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14484044" />
    <title>Comment from albear on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>albear</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Forgot to mention, the 1973 logo is actually 1987. This is the 1973 logo, the letters are not as modern, this was introduced in 1987 I remember that. -----&gt; <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/c5/Pepsi_logo.jpg/180px-Pepsi_logo.jpg" rel="nofollow">[upload.wikimedia.org]</a></p><br />
<p>From, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepsi" rel="nofollow">[en.wikipedia.org]</a></p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T08:15:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14484003</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14484003" />
    <title>Comment from pockygt on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>pockygt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't really have anything clever to say, but here's the PDF from the recent redesign on the pepsi logo.  Sure it's a little old, but it's simply an amazing read.</p>
<p><a href="http://jimedwardsnrx.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/pepsi_gravitational_field.pdf" rel="nofollow">[jimedwardsnrx.files.wordpress.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T08:12:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14483932</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14483932" />
    <title>Comment from albear on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>albear</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I noticed I don't drink nearly as much Pepsi as I used to since the butt-ugly new logo came on the scene.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T08:07:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14483891</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14483891" />
    <title>Comment from I Love New Jersey on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>I Love New Jersey</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14483712" rel="nofollow">Coop</a>: Unless they change it from the current Obama cola label.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T08:04:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14483715</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14483715" />
    <title>Comment from enthreeoh on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>enthreeoh</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/6660/pepsilogo.jpg" rel="nofollow">[img268.imageshack.us]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T07:49:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14483712</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14483712" />
    <title>Comment from 2 replies on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>2 replies</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>This logo change is just going to make Back to the Future 2 look even MORE dated. X-D<br />
(They use the 1973 logo in their depiction of 2015.)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T07:48:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14483710</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14483710" />
    <title>Comment from enthreeoh on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>enthreeoh</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Someone posted this on digg earlier, haha.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T07:48:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14483660</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14483660" />
    <title>Comment from 2 replies on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>2 replies</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482066" rel="nofollow">H3ion</a>: <br />
Obama + Bing = Pepsi?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T07:44:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14483569</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14483569" />
    <title>Comment from TeeArr on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>TeeArr</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482066" rel="nofollow">H3ion</a>: It's blatantly obvious.  If you turn the logo about 70 degrees left, and imagine the white portion more centered, it's almost identical to Obullma's logo.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T07:37:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14483411</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14483411" />
    <title>Comment from BlazerUnit on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>BlazerUnit</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482066" rel="nofollow">H3ion</a>: And I maintain that anyone who believes this will never drive me around in any car, truck, van, or rickshaw--as there isn't a thing from the two symbols that are remotely alike, other than the colors.  How anyone thinks they look alike, I'll never know.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T07:24:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14483334</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14483334" />
    <title>Comment from Joseph P. Hillenburg on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joseph P. Hillenburg</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Killian, perhaps, but since the late-1880s, though varying levels of adornment have surrounded it, the basic logo is unchanged.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T07:19:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14483256</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14483256" />
    <title>Comment from Eccles on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Eccles</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I think we're overlooking an important point here: they both taste like malted battery acid.</p><br />
<p>(apologies to Berke B.)</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T07:14:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14483243</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14483243" />
    <title>Comment from parrotuya on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>parrotuya</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>No coke, Pepsi!  Cheeseburga, cheeseburga, cheeseburga!</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T07:13:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14483103</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14483103" />
    <title>Comment from IceMax on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>IceMax</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482641" rel="nofollow">shepd</a>: The 40's and 70's logo are my favorites too, I always hated the '05 logo.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T07:03:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14482950</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14482950" />
    <title>Comment from wickedpixel on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>wickedpixel</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482160" rel="nofollow">supercereal</a>: twas the style of the day. someday folks will look back at the logos of the early 21st century and say "what's with all the shiny logos with fake reflections?"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T06:53:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14482879</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14482879" />
    <title>Comment from Kllian on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kllian</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This isn't true.  Coke has had many logos over the years.</p>
<p><a href="http://cocacolaloft.blogspot.com/2006/04/coca-cola-script-trademarklogo.html" rel="nofollow">[cocacolaloft.blogspot.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T06:48:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14482841</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14482841" />
    <title>Comment from PsiCop on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>PsiCop</name>
        <uri>http://www.agnostic-library.com/ma/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.agnostic-library.com/ma/">
        <![CDATA[<p>But ... but ... but ... you left out the <a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/new-coke" rel="nofollow">"New Coke"</a> logo. It should come in labeled "1985," followed by the old logo restored later that same year.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T06:45:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14482641</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14482641" />
    <title>Comment from shepd on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>shepd</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>1940 and 1973 are the only good Pepsi logos.</p>
<p>The latest one looked better on the side of a shoe.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T06:29:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14482634</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14482634" />
    <title>Comment from Bs Baldwin on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bs Baldwin</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Pepsi was fine until they jumped on the Helvetica craze in the 60's.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T06:29:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14482435</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14482435" />
    <title>Comment from therethinker on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>therethinker</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://justcreativedesign.com/2009/07/27/what-makes-a-good-logo/" rel="nofollow">[justcreativedesign.com]</a></p>
<p>I read this article earlier today, and I'm assuming he made the image.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T06:12:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14482366</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14482366" />
    <title>Comment from redkamel on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>redkamel</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482066" rel="nofollow">H3ion</a>: It always reminds of an airline.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T06:08:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14482300</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14482300" />
    <title>Comment from Robobot on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Robobot</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482066" rel="nofollow">H3ion</a>: I have always wondered if that was intentional. They changed it around the time of Obama's inauguration and their ad campaign at the time was all about "hope" and whatnot. The DC metro was wallpapers with those ads during inauguration.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T06:04:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14482211</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14482211" />
    <title>Comment from Lel on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lel</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482066" rel="nofollow">H3ion</a>: I saw the new logo for the first time when I was in DC for the inauguration. I thought the same thing, since they never had the word Pepsi anywhere on the ad.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T05:58:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14482192</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14482192" />
    <title>Comment from Chris Walters on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Walters</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/consumerchris</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/consumerchris">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14482160" rel="nofollow">supercereal</a>: That was back when cocaine was in cola.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T05:56:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14482160</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14482160" />
    <title>Comment from supercereal on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>supercereal</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Is it me, or does it look like a 3rd grader drew Pepsi's first logo in 1898?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T05:55:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14482066</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14482066" />
    <title>Comment from H3ion on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>H3ion</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>The latest Pepsi logo looks like it was lifted from the Obama campaign.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T05:46:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14482031</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14482031" />
    <title>Comment from Wombatish on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Wombatish</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The PDFs that went along with the "r-evolution" of the new Pepsi logo were funnier.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T05:44:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047-comment:14482023</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325047" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/pepsi-vs-coke-logo-evolution.html#c14482023" />
    <title>Comment from SpruceStreetPhil on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>SpruceStreetPhil</name>
        <uri>http://jordanhmartin.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jordanhmartin.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I like the variations of the pepsi logo nowadays.  Didn't notice it until Sunday either.  Pepsi Max has a fat white stripe and Diet Pepsi has a thinner white stripe.  But I'm a Coke / RC guy myself.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T05:43:27Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



