<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T11:45:46Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for </title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5325645" title="" />
    <published>2009-07-29T22:46:32Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-29T23:29:11Z</updated>
    <title></title>
    <summary>AT&amp;T users in parts of the Northeast and Midwest had a massive mobile data outage (both 3G and EDGE) this morning. Voice reception was not affected. One user reported receiving a $25 credit after calling AT&amp;T to find out what was going on, so it may not hurt to ask. [Business Insider]</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Laura Northrup</name>
      <uri>http://www.lauriebird.com/blog</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="AT&amp;T" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><strong>AT&T users in parts of the Northeast and Midwest had a <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/att-suffers-massive-mobile-data-outage-in-northeast-2009-7">massive mobile data outage</a> (both 3G and EDGE) this morning. </strong>Voice reception was not affected. One user reported receiving a $25 credit after calling AT&T to find out what was going on, so it may not hurt to ask. [<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/att-suffers-massive-mobile-data-outage-in-northeast-2009-7">Business Insider</a>]</p>
]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14505702</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14505702" />
    <title>Comment from dbrewer80221 on 2009-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>dbrewer80221</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It wasn't restricted to just those states.</p>
<p>I live in Vegas and was not able to get an Edge/3G connection from midnight until about 4 am PST. I work nights and use my phone to keep myself entertained.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T05:22:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14501760</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14501760" />
    <title>Comment from MMD on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>MMD</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14498594" rel="nofollow">Rachacha</a>: When I pay for a service that's supposed to be available all of the time, I don't think it's unreasonable to expect a service credit for when it's not working.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T02:08:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14501505</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14501505" />
    <title>Comment from maex on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>maex</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/kairex</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/kairex">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well there we go, I was wondering what was going on. I just took a nap on the El instead of surfing like I usually would.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T01:58:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14499401</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14499401" />
    <title>Comment from Andrewjh on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Andrewjh</name>
        <uri>http://csmonitor.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://csmonitor.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Just got off the phone with AT&amp;T service rep Dawn Herbert. After telling her about not being able to check the weather on my iPhone this morning and reading about the outage on Consumerist, I was given a $30 credit. (!)<br />
She confirmed that it was a "priority 1 RNC System Outage" affecting multiple Northeast states. <br />
Pretty sweet for three minutes on the phone. Thanks, Dawn. And thanks, Consumerist.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T00:45:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14499097</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14499097" />
    <title>Comment from emis on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>emis</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>This outage must be just affecting certain towers?</p>
<p>I have an iPhone (3G) and BB (EDGE) on AT&amp;T -- I'm in metro-Boston and both have been working and receiving data/voice since 6:30AM.  I use the iPhone for IM and personal email, if there's been an interruption it was seamless and less then ~15-20 minutes long.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T00:33:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14499095</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14499095" />
    <title>Comment from Cant_stop_the_rock on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cant_stop_the_rock</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14498213" rel="nofollow">kc2idf</a>:</p>
<p>I don't think Apple really cares much about a regional outage that lasted a few hours.  If it happened every week they'd probably care.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T00:33:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14499064</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14499064" />
    <title>Comment from G.O.B.: Come on! on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>G.O.B.: Come on!</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14498594" rel="nofollow">Rachacha</a>: During the outage, I couldn't Twitter about my $6,000 suits in the elevator. That's a big deal.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T00:32:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14499027</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14499027" />
    <title>Comment from davebg5 on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>davebg5</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14498594" rel="nofollow">Rachacha</a>: Normally, yes, but AT&amp;T's service has become progressively more and more absurd:  data outages in large swaths of the country, visual voice mail messages delayed for weeks, still no MMS, slower than advertised 3G speeds, completely unreliable coverage in major metropolitan areas...</p>
<p>At this point AT&amp;T has burned through any of the goodwill that any company can possibly expect to get from their paying customers.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T00:30:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14498714</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14498714" />
    <title>Comment from koali on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>koali</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5325645/#c14498048" rel="nofollow">admiral_stabbin</a>: Same here. I don't get any service in my office building to the point where I just leave my cell phone at home.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T00:19:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14498594</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14498594" />
    <title>Comment from Rachacha on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rachacha</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Oh My God, I was without data service for 30 minutes before 9:00am EST...The horror!!!</p><br />
<p>As an AT&amp;T customer, I did not notice that there was an outage (because I did not use any data on my phone at that time in the morning), but is a 30 minute to an hour disruption REALLY that big of a deal as some were indicating in the original article? I could see the issue if data were out for several hours or several days as some of the Blackberry services were out a couple of years ago.</p><br />
<p>Data outages, just like electrical outages happen, and the company appeared to resolve the issue in a timely manner.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T00:16:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14498570</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14498570" />
    <title>Comment from ugadawg on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>ugadawg</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14497067" rel="nofollow">G.O.B.: Come on!</a>: Man I wish.  The war was fun while it lasted eh.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T00:15:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14498517</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14498517" />
    <title>Comment from hungryhomer on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>hungryhomer</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/divalentino</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/divalentino">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's those damned cyber terrorists with their jailbroken iPhones. Somebody call John McClain, we need some cop cars flung at helicopters, pronto.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T00:13:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14498213</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14498213" />
    <title>Comment from kc2idf on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>kc2idf</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, I wonder how Apple feels about this, since AT&amp;T is the only carrier officially "allowed" to serve iPhones . . .</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-30T00:02:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14498048</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14498048" />
    <title>Comment from admiral_stabbin on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>admiral_stabbin</name>
        <uri>http://www.assfarmer.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.assfarmer.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm guessing this is unrelated to the blackouts of voice and data service that I consistently get in my own home. ;-)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T23:56:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14497674</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14497674" />
    <title>Comment from davebg5 on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>davebg5</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I got a pro-rated data credit.  $1/day for data.  Then I asked the CSR if, since we were going to handle network problems on a day-by-day basis, if she'd like to review all of my calls for the past month and give me a pro-rated service credit for each day I dropped a call.  I mean, it's only fair not to have to pay for services not properly rendered, right?</p>
<p>She took the Fifth.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T23:43:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14497638</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14497638" />
    <title>Comment from tailstoo on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>tailstoo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I was out all morning until about 8am.  Thanks AT&amp;T!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T23:42:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14497194</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14497194" />
    <title>Comment from segfault on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>segfault</name>
        <uri>http://slashdot.org/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://slashdot.org/">
        <![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T gave me a pro-rated credit on my airtime bill due to cellular service being unavailable during an ice storm.  They refused to pro-rate the data bill!  Even though the data wouldn't work without cell service, either.  I am not buying another iPhone until Apple dumps AT&amp;T.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T23:27:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14497067</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14497067" />
    <title>Comment from G.O.B.: Come on! on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>G.O.B.: Come on!</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>The wrath of 4chan?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T23:23:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14496858</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14496858" />
    <title>Comment from EqualOpportunityCrasher on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>EqualOpportunityCrasher</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c14496389" rel="nofollow">ChristopherDavis</a>: It had to have been.  How else would Apple and AT&amp;T be able to legitimize their claim that jailbreaking constitutes a terrorist action?  It has nothing to do with a crap system, stifling competition, or illegal use of monopoly.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T23:16:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14496750</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14496750" />
    <title>Comment from Homerjay. Good and good for you. on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Homerjay. Good and good for you.</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>I just chalked it up to AT&amp;T being AT&amp;T. Next time I'll be dialing for dollars.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T23:12:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645-comment:14496389</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5325645" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/07/att-users-in-parts-of.html#c14496389" />
    <title>Comment from ChristopherDavis on 2009-07-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>ChristopherDavis</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I wonder if it's because someone has a jailbroken iPhone.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-29T23:01:05Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



