<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T12:15:37Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for </title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5300439" title="" />
    <published>2009-06-23T08:12:03Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-23T07:17:19Z</updated>
    <title></title>
    <summary>The New York Times takes a look at &quot;contact scraping,&quot; which is when a website tricks you into providing access to your address book and then spams all of your friends by saying you asked them to join. Some of the offenders include Tagged.com, MyLife.com (formerly Reunion.com), and desktopdating.net. [New York Times]</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Chris Walters</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Horror Stories" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>The New York Times takes a look at "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CONTACT SCRAPING" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CONTACT SCRAPING" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/contact-scraping/">contact scraping</a>," which is when a website tricks you into providing access to your address book and then spams all of your friends by saying you asked them to join. Some of the offenders include Tagged.com, MyLife.com (formerly Reunion.com), and desktopdating.net. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/20/technology/internet/20shortcuts.html">New York Times</a>]</p>
]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13865266</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13865266" />
    <title>Comment from MooseOfReason on 2009-06-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>MooseOfReason</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13817681" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: Logically, a computer with a high price to begin with, when the price depreciates, it could still be higher.</p>
<p>You're still paying more for the same hardware, sometimes even with a $500 discount.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-25T23:32:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13823867</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13823867" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-06-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13820391" rel="nofollow">bluewyvern</a>: Oh shoot. You're right. I'm hashing my typing hand with corrective red ink as I type.<br />
You know, I don't even know what word I meant to use. Innately?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-24T07:39:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13823398</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13823398" />
    <title>Comment from stranger than fiction on 2009-06-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>stranger than fiction</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c13809909" rel="nofollow">unobservant</a>: I should clarify (which, for the record, I am doing blind because my unapproved new-account comment is no longer visible — talk about no edit button, lol):  Yes I see that they advise against giving your yahoo or gmail passwords to third-party sites.  I'm not sure that that language will be clear to the less tech-savvy folks, who are the ones that most need to hear it.  Nor do I think there was enough emphasis on password security.</p><br />
<p>...but, then, I'm a former keeper-of-passwords, so I'm probably a bit more anal about that than most!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-24T07:09:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13823279</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13823279" />
    <title>Comment from stranger than fiction on 2009-06-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>stranger than fiction</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c13800920" rel="nofollow">rickatnight11</a>: One of the people highlighted in the NYT story denied giving out his password as well.  How, then, are these sites getting the info?  Unauthorized third-party access to login cookies?  (Do you remember if you were logged in to your gmail account when you signed up at LinkedIn?)  Screen capture?  Or, more alarmingly, somehow accessing stored passwords in your resident email client or your browser??  That's trojan/virus/malware territory.</p><br />
<p>Stories like these make me feel not so bad for being a Luddite when it comes to social networking.  I just recently got dragged kicking and screaming onto Facebook.  Their friend finder's emphasis on "enter your email and password!" is a little creepy.  It's prominently at the top of the page, whereas the "enter your friend's email/IM" options are buried farther down.  Even if I was crazy enough to share my password, I don't necessarily want to "friend" everybody on my contact list!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-24T07:00:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13822950</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13822950" />
    <title>Comment from stranger than fiction on 2009-06-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>stranger than fiction</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c13809909" rel="nofollow">unobservant</a>: Word.  I couldn't believe the author blithely gave her password to an unknown site, and was shameless enough about it to let it be published in the <i>New York Times</i> as if it was a common or sensible thing to do...??</p><br />
<p>The article is a good cautionary tale, but would have been much better if it said outright "DON'T GIVE OUT YOUR PASSWORDS!" for the benefit of those who seemingly don't know any better.  (...and, for readers who had already been taken in, tell them to CHANGE whatever password(s) they mistakenly distributed!)</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-24T06:40:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13820639</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13820639" />
    <title>Comment from UnnamedUser on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>UnnamedUser</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I get spammed frequently from some outfit called Grouply. Same scam, I think.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-24T04:32:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13820391</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13820391" />
    <title>Comment from bluewyvern on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>bluewyvern</name>
        <uri>http://bluewyverntea.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://bluewyverntea.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13805246" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: *eyebrow* I don't think "inimically" was quite the word you wanted. Although kudos if it was.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-24T04:19:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13817681</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13817681" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13805894" rel="nofollow">lvhotrain</a>: Funny, I <i>sell </i>my used Macs for more than $500. What's the resale value on your $400? For PCs in general? Do people even <i>buy </i>used PCs?!<br />
Again, value over price. Wins every time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-24T02:23:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13810106</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13810106" />
    <title>Comment from unobservant on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>unobservant</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13803188" rel="nofollow">rickatnight11</a>: So how did they get access to your contact list, then, if you didn't give them access to your account?</p>
<p>When LinkedIn asked me if they could spam my friends, I told them to have fun trying without my PASSWORD or the manual input of my friends' email addresses.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T22:54:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13809966</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13809966" />
    <title>Comment from unobservant on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>unobservant</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13798411" rel="nofollow">catastrophegirl - brand new homeowner</a>: Oh, you HAVE to click, do you? Your friend might think you said you weren't her friend? OH NOES.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T22:50:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13809909</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13809909" />
    <title>Comment from unobservant on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>unobservant</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>People give out their email passwords and access to their contact list to anyone who asks?</p>
<p>Can we send them directions to a convention centre where I can personally smack each one of them upside the head? (After gleaning their SIN numbers and banking info, of course.)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T22:48:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13805894</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13805894" />
    <title>Comment from lvhotrain on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>lvhotrain</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5300439/#c13805246" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: You only think your nicer because your pretty notebook makes you elitest. In reality you been suckered into a marketing trap, while the rest of the world knows you paid $1000 insead of $400.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T21:03:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13805294</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13805294" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13799578" rel="nofollow">My Asian Grandma</a>: Y'know, at least <i>my </i>aunt buys me flowers when she want to date me...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T20:46:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13805246</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13805246" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13799505" rel="nofollow">MooseOfReason</a>: Nahs, it's because we're inimically nicer people. :P</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T20:45:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13804085</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13804085" />
    <title>Comment from HiPwr on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>HiPwr</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Being an anti-social asshole has it's benefits. Less spam.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T20:07:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13803974</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13803974" />
    <title>Comment from Raekwon on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Raekwon</name>
        <uri>http://sefjwm.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://sefjwm.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13803958" rel="nofollow">Raekwon</a>: At least I think it was tagged.  May have been a similar name I don't pay much attention to them.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T20:02:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13803958</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13803958" />
    <title>Comment from Raekwon on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Raekwon</name>
        <uri>http://sefjwm.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://sefjwm.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I get tagged.com ones through my Xfire even.  I wasn't aware Xfire was big enough to be worth spammers' time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T20:01:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13803200</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13803200" />
    <title>Comment from rickatnight11 on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>rickatnight11</name>
        <uri>http://www.rickatnight11.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rickatnight11.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13802366" rel="nofollow">Dirk</a>: You're absolutely right.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T19:31:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13803188</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13803188" />
    <title>Comment from rickatnight11 on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>rickatnight11</name>
        <uri>http://www.rickatnight11.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rickatnight11.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13801064" rel="nofollow">Charlotte Rae's Web</a>: Nope, I just played with my profile after that.  I can't <i>stand</i> it when people do things like add a Facebook app and "suggest" it to every single "friend" (I think that feature should be absolutely disabled), so I am very careful not to expose my contacts to spamming.  I never thought LI would do that to me.  I was religious about it before, but I'll never give my contact list out to an automated site again, regardless of their reputation.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T19:31:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13802862</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13802862" />
    <title>Comment from Cant_stop_the_rock on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cant_stop_the_rock</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is why I don't even let more reputable sites like LinkedIn and Facebook have access to my e-mail accounts.  I trust those sites, but I just don't like the idea of giving someone else access to my accounts.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T19:18:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13802366</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13802366" />
    <title>Comment from Dirk on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dirk</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I just don't understand why anyone would give their email and their email password to a website. You're asking for trouble.</p>
<p>I know that some folks put sites like Facebook or LinkedIn in the so-called "respected" or "trusted" websites category. However, you're being foolish to hand over this information to <i><b>any</b></i> website. You never know where that information is going to go and how long they'll keep it.</p>
<p>I mean really... you're giving someone your email address and the password. Think about it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T18:59:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13801064</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13801064" />
    <title>Comment from Charlotte Rae&apos;s Web on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Charlotte Rae&apos;s Web</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13800920" rel="nofollow">rickatnight11</a>: LinkedIn is pretty good in my experience about that - it didn't sent them to mine when I clicked no. Did you import contacts at another point?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T17:43:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13800920</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13800920" />
    <title>Comment from rickatnight11 on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>rickatnight11</name>
        <uri>http://www.rickatnight11.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rickatnight11.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's sad to say that respected sites like LinkedIn do this as well.  When I signed up over a year ago, I specifically selected to NOT send invites to my Gmail contacts.  I received annoyed responses almost immediately, much to my surprise.  Maybe a bug, but it definitely ticked me off.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T17:24:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13800774</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13800774" />
    <title>Comment from bohemian on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>bohemian</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>What makes this worse is that many email applications like gmail put anyone you ever received an email from into your address book. So this isn't just spamming someone's friends. It is spamming everyone that ever contact them including emails from groups like Yahoogroups.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T17:04:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13800061</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13800061" />
    <title>Comment from Shoelace on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shoelace</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine on Facebook had her account hacked into. Her other friends and I subsequently found the same message in our Inboxes saying a friend of this friend needs money ASAP, please help, etc. Writing was 'Nigerian Prince' level illiterate and no one fell for it, but these dirtbags must get lucky once in awhile or they wouldn't bother.</p>
<p>Can't help but wonder if my friend used one of the applications that entice by saying a friend of yours uses it (not necessarily true - I think Facebook allows names to be put into these ads unless you explicitly opt out of it).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T14:45:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13799578</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13799578" />
    <title>Comment from Mozoltov, motherfucker on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mozoltov, motherfucker</name>
        <uri>http://www.kinkomatic.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kinkomatic.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>That's funny I just got an email from desktopdating.com  I think my aunt must have signed up with this and didn't know that they would send spam to all the email addresses in her email account. I was trying to figure why the hell she sent me this email for.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T12:46:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13799505</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13799505" />
    <title>Comment from MooseOfReason on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>MooseOfReason</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13799085" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: And there aren't many viruses on Macs because not many people use them. :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T12:35:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13799085</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13799085" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I've been hit with a blizzard of these things from hoodwinked friends.<br />
Curiously, the same ones that I ended up having to bookmark Snopes.com to point them to a reputable source to dispel some of the online sillyness that they bought into.<br />
Grateful to have a Mac, or they'd probably have already tried infecting me with various and sundry viruses while they were at it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T11:18:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439-comment:13798411</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5300439" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/the-new-york-times-takes.html#c13798411" />
    <title>Comment from catastrophegirl on 2009-06-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>catastrophegirl</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>explains the emails i've been getting from Tagged lately... and ignoring. <br />
looks like this:</p>
<p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-23T09:54:39Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



