<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T12:05:12Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Madoff Eligible To Scam Again In Only 150 Years</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5303675" title="Madoff Eligible To Scam Again In Only 150 Years" />
    <published>2009-06-29T21:19:45Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-29T21:26:00Z</updated>
    <title>Madoff Eligible To Scam Again In Only 150 Years</title>
    <summary>--&gt;A federal judge has sentenced Bernard L. Madoff to 150 years in prison, after which time we assume he&apos;ll drink the blood of the living, hang out a shingle, and start soliciting &quot;investments.&quot; </summary>
    <author>
      <name>Meg Marco</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/31/2009/06/6-29-2009_12-02-35_PM.jpg" width="210" height="256" />-->A federal judge has sentenced Bernard L. Madoff to 150 years in prison, after which time we assume he'll drink the blood of the living, hang out a shingle, and start soliciting "investments." </p>
<p>The <em>New York Times</em> reports that the judge didn't buy Madoff's theory that there was some sort of "mob vengeance" surrounding calls for a long prison term.</p>
<p>"Objectively speaking, the fraud here was staggering," the judge said. "It spanned more than 20 years." </p>
<p>Of course, this was just a polite, judgy way of saying  "LOL, no dude, what you did <strong>really is that bad.</strong>"</p>
<p>Speaking for himself, Fraudy McEvil told the court his life really sucks. </p>
<p>"I live in a tormented state now, knowing all of the pain and suffering that I've created. I've left a legacy of shame, as some of my victims have pointed out, to my family and my grandchildren."</p>
<p>He also apologized to his victims, acknowledging that it didn't really matter if he was sorry.</p>
<p>"I will turn and face you. I'm sorry. I know that doesn't help you."</p>
<p>The Times also noted that when passing the maximum sentence on Captain Jackass, the judge mentioned that no one &mdash; not "friends, family or other supporters had submitted any letters on Mr. Madoff's behalf, attesting to the strength of his character or good deeds he had done."</p>
<p>So, future Madoffs, take note: Be sure to Robin Hood it up whilst stealing people's life savings. It'll look better in court.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/30/business/30madoff.html?hp">Madoff Sentenced to 150 Years in Prison for Ponzi Scheme </a> [NYT]</p>
]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13999994</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13999994" />
    <title>Comment from anduin on 2009-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>anduin</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>picture is hilarious</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-02T07:08:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13989256</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13989256" />
    <title>Comment from Rectilinear Propagation on 2009-07-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rectilinear Propagation</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13943729" rel="nofollow">Thanatos</a>:<br />
King Richard: Brother, you have surrounded your given name with a foul stench!<br />
[to the crowd]<br />
King Richard: From this day forth, all the toilets in the kingdom shall be known as... johns!<br />
Crowd: [cheers]<br />
Prince John: NOOOOOOOOOOO!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-01T22:45:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13980054</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13980054" />
    <title>Comment from ospreyguy on 2009-07-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>ospreyguy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5303675/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years?skyline=true&amp;s=x#c13936017" rel="nofollow">blueneon</a>: I can't stand this. Yeah the guy stole, he's an asshat and needs to go to jail. But there is a 2 TIME CONVICTED child molesting rapist 4 miles from my house and my 2 little girls. He moved to FL from NY and has the freedom to live near me. WTF is wrong with the system that a scammer will DIE in prison with this lowlife piece of shit free to roam the country.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-01T16:13:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13977599</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13977599" />
    <title>Comment from EinhornIsAMan! on 2009-07-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>EinhornIsAMan!</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13936017" rel="nofollow">blueneon</a>: I'm also against the division of Second/First Degree murder. In my country, there is only Murder and Manslaughter</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-01T09:20:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13977575</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13977575" />
    <title>Comment from EinhornIsAMan! on 2009-07-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>EinhornIsAMan!</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13942319" rel="nofollow">Sheogorath</a>: Lucky for Madoff though there's no god</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-01T09:18:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13977564</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13977564" />
    <title>Comment from EinhornIsAMan! on 2009-07-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>EinhornIsAMan!</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13937286" rel="nofollow">wgrune</a>: If we could indefinitely lengthen people's lives and keep them on special life support, I would have all criminals serve out their entire sentences that extend past their natural lives and then be killed</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-01T09:17:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13972147</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13972147" />
    <title>Comment from deleteboy on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>deleteboy</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Meg! Such a saucy treatment of the person in question! The nouns and antecedents you use!</p>
<p>Do you e-mail your mother with those typing hands? -har!-</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-01T03:00:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13965414</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13965414" />
    <title>Comment from pirate_eggie on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>pirate_eggie</name>
        <uri>http://pirate-eggie.livejournal.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pirate-eggie.livejournal.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13940303" rel="nofollow">morlo</a>: My heart goes out to her...NOT!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T23:28:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13964775</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13964775" />
    <title>Comment from humphrmi on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>humphrmi</name>
        <uri>http://famille.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://famille.org">
        <![CDATA[<p><p><br />
<blockquote>Madoff Eligible To Scam Again In Only 150 Years</blockquote><br />
<p></p><br />
<p>Umm, not to sound pedantic, but the end of his prison term != the time he is inelgible to be involved in the financial services industry.</p><br />
<p>Assuming that he lived to be 221 (150 plus 71), upon his release he'd still be inelgible for any US licenses to hold most jobs in the financial services sector.</p></p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T23:09:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13963239</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13963239" />
    <title>Comment from gerrycomo on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>gerrycomo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Should've been crucified instead but then he's Jewish so I don't wanna look anti-semitic...</p>
<p>(hi hi)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T22:24:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13960629</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13960629" />
    <title>Comment from Thanatos on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Thanatos</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13944714" rel="nofollow">LibertyReign</a>:</p>
<p>I was going for something even worse but I'll take whatever sticks...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T21:03:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13959045</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13959045" />
    <title>Comment from LibertyReign on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>LibertyReign</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13945878" rel="nofollow">johnva</a>:</p>
<p>Madoff never stole anything from me. You see... I don't believe in getting rich quick. I never invested any money into his bullshit scams..which were obviously bullshit..just as the NASDAQ was when he ran it..</p>
<p>I was under the impression taxes were to fund the operation of the government, not to pay back shotty investments.. I guess I was misinformed..</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T20:10:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13957938</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13957938" />
    <title>Comment from PsiCop on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>PsiCop</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13936753" rel="nofollow">Righteous</a>: Absolutely right. He isn't sorry about anything he did. If he were, he'd have been more cooperative, and would actively have gone about the process of liquidating his own assets in order to pay off his debts. Instead, he tried to keep as much stuff for himself, as he could.</p>
<p>The only thing he is sorry about, is that he was caught ... both for having operated the Ponzi scheme in the first place, and for having tried to shelter his property.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T19:31:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13953731</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13953731" />
    <title>Comment from wvFrugan on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>wvFrugan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I AM PREPARED TO BE FLAMED<br />You know, I really don't feel too sorry for most of those that lost money. The behavior and often downright criminal activity that resulted in the fortunes these people had, and the generational transfer of such wealth is really hard on society. There comes a point where enough is enough already with the excess concentration of wealth. I've seen a few ordinary folks that got ripped off, but the vast majority are privilaged trustafarians or those with somewhat shady dealings behind their wealth. Just as our Great Recession has caused us to save more, I wonder if any of these types will look back and think perhaps they should have used a bit of their wealth in the here and now for the wider benefit of society. Think of all the good that so many could have done with the money their greed got them scammed out of, or that was lost when Wall Street crashed. Please don't praise the charitable works some of these people did do: it is so miniscule compaired to their total net worth. Also, I know several charities lost everything: perhaps these Foundations &amp; Trusts should quit making themselves permanent fixtures &amp; get the money out there doing more good.<br />YOU MAY NOW FLAME AWAY at this socialist commie pinko fag...</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T11:59:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13953226</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13953226" />
    <title>Comment from huadpe on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>huadpe</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13938920" rel="nofollow">dragonfire81</a>: It's to punish the criminal for the crime (s)he committed.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T10:46:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13951709</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13951709" />
    <title>Comment from Megalomania on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Megalomania</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13935707" rel="nofollow">NotChoinski</a>: but then he would have been out of jail for 850 years!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T08:23:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13951342</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13951342" />
    <title>Comment from Moosehawk on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Moosehawk</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13936753" rel="nofollow">Righteous</a>: I'd say he's pretty sorry he got caught. =P</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T07:54:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13949408</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13949408" />
    <title>Comment from H3ion on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>H3ion</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13948165" rel="nofollow">scoosdad</a>: If that's the one at the traffic circle, it looks almost pleasant, as prisons go.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T05:24:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13949236</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13949236" />
    <title>Comment from slickdealer on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>slickdealer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13946813" rel="nofollow">Kaellorian</a>: <br />
Actually, it's more like 87%. They don't give you good time on your good time. Unlike state prison systems that just give you a flat X amount of days a year, the feds give you X amount of days per year SERVED. So if you get sentenced to a year and a day (the minimum for any good time), and they give you 54 days good time per year technically, you end up getting less because 366-54 != a year. So they prorate your good time based on this ridiculous system.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T05:14:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13949223</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13949223" />
    <title>Comment from dave23 on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>dave23</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13937400" rel="nofollow">Righteous</a>: that happened to me once too.....</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T05:13:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13949222</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13949222" />
    <title>Comment from dave23 on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>dave23</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13937400" rel="nofollow">Righteous</a>: that happened to me once too.....</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T05:13:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13949113</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13949113" />
    <title>Comment from Grrrrrrr, portrait of a chickenwolfmoosepig. on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Grrrrrrr, portrait of a chickenwolfmoosepig.</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wow, I was saying just the other day that he deserved 120 years, not 12.  I guess the judge was even more harsh than I was.</p>
<p>The guy willingly and knowingly destroyed countless lives, with nothing else in mind but absolute greed. He's right where he should be.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T05:07:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13949048</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13949048" />
    <title>Comment from Grrrrrrr, portrait of a chickenwolfmoosepig. on 2009-06-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Grrrrrrr, portrait of a chickenwolfmoosepig.</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13935707" rel="nofollow">NotChoinski</a>: That would be awesome.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T05:03:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13948616</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13948616" />
    <title>Comment from bigmac12 on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>bigmac12</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Phew...150 years...that's a lot of Vaseline!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T04:40:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13948165</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13948165" />
    <title>Comment from scoosdad on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>scoosdad</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13946205" rel="nofollow">H3ion</a>: Leading candidate at the moment is the federal prison/hospital in Ayer, MA:</p>
<p>From the Boston Herald:</p>
<p></p><blockquote>Located at the former Fort Devens some 40 miles west of Boston, Devens Federal Medical Center houses some 1,100 male inmates who require long-term medical or psychiatric treatment.</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1181857&amp;srvc=business&amp;position=0" rel="nofollow">[www.bostonherald.com]</a></p>
<p>The former Ft. Devens site is being slowly turned over to manufacturing and housing.  It's a predominantly wooded, shady location not too far up Rt. 2 from Concord, and the only harsh thing about it is the New England winter.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T04:15:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13946813</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13946813" />
    <title>Comment from Kaellorian on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kaellorian</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13942883" rel="nofollow">zentec</a>: It's 85% minimum in the federal system.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T03:14:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13946435</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13946435" />
    <title>Comment from ophmarketing on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>ophmarketing</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13937286" rel="nofollow">wgrune</a>: I still wouldn't trust him, even then.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T02:59:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13946205</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13946205" />
    <title>Comment from H3ion on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>H3ion</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Now the question is where is he going to serve his time.  If it's at Club Fed in Pennsylvania (I thought it was near Bucknell), then he'll learn how to work on his tennis game.  If it's a legitimate prison, like Leavenworth, he'll have some serious problems real quick.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T02:50:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13945992</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13945992" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's too bad he couldn't be sentenced to house arrest in a little one room apartment with iffy air conditioning and heat, and forced to live on a small food stamp allotment & medicare.  TV would be an old analog set with a converter box & whatever it could pick up OTA.

<p>It would be cheaper than prison, and he wouldn't have any of the luxuries he enjoyed while bilking everyone out of their investments.  I think it would be a great punishment for someone like him.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T02:42:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13945878</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13945878" />
    <title>Comment from johnva on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>johnva</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13944455" rel="nofollow">LibertyReign</a>: It's Madoff. Taxes are not "stealing", but lost tax revenue due to his scam is a loss to society.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T02:38:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13945689</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13945689" />
    <title>Comment from sonneillon on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>sonneillon</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13943209" rel="nofollow">FinanceGuru</a>: True, but they have nicer prisons.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T02:31:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13944714</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13944714" />
    <title>Comment from LibertyReign on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>LibertyReign</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13943729" rel="nofollow">Thanatos</a>:</p>
<p>You mean like Ponzi? LOL!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T01:59:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13944665</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13944665" />
    <title>Comment from LibertyReign on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>LibertyReign</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13938780" rel="nofollow">takes_so_little</a>:</p>
<p>You mean like the Federal Reserve?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T01:57:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13944659</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13944659" />
    <title>Comment from alexcassidy on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>alexcassidy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5303675/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years#c13938780" rel="nofollow">takes_so_little</a>: I hope you're wrong too, but I doubt it.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T01:57:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13944629</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13944629" />
    <title>Comment from LibertyReign on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>LibertyReign</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13937446" rel="nofollow">sir_eccles</a>:</p>
<p>LOL! A+</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T01:56:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13944455</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13944455" />
    <title>Comment from LibertyReign on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>LibertyReign</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13936980" rel="nofollow">johnva</a>:</p>
<p>Is this Madoff stealing from us, or is this the Federal government stealing from us??</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T01:51:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13943729</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13943729" />
    <title>Comment from Thanatos on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Thanatos</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>150 years in prison is not sufficient punishment.</p>
<p>Everyone should start using the word "Madoff" as a swear word, a word that means something along the lines of lower than the scum of the Earth.  The more this "insult" sticks, the more this name will live on in history as "lower than scum" and countless Madoff generations can suffer the repercussions of the actions of one stupid ancestor.</p>
<p>Perhaps this will even make the families change their last name and eventually annihilate the name from the face of the planet.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T01:30:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13943482</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13943482" />
    <title>Comment from Ariella Kadosh on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ariella Kadosh</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Call me inhumane, but i would love to see his fat, rich papmpered ass put into general population at a medium security prison. Seriously.."Prison consultants?!" Gen Pop will know what to do with him. They will se a rich, white guy comingand give him a nice shiv welcome. Class warfare exists, don't fart bunnies and rainbows and tell me it does not.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T01:22:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13943209</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13943209" />
    <title>Comment from FinanceGuru on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>FinanceGuru</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5303675/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years?skyline=true&amp;s=x#c13935696" rel="nofollow">dragonfire81</a>: Nay, nay. There's no parole in the federal system.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T01:13:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13943053</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13943053" />
    <title>Comment from socalrob of the 24 and a half century on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>socalrob of the 24 and a half century</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5303675/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years#c13935707" rel="nofollow">NotChoinski</a>: <br />Plotline: Becomes friend of Benders, develops get rich quick scheme, takes everyones money, spreads money out over other heads, Bite Benders Shiney Metal Ass, Resolution.</p><br />
<p>Sounds like a good episode!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T01:09:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13942903</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13942903" />
    <title>Comment from Willmeister on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Willmeister</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13935999" rel="nofollow">Mondoz</a>: the prisoners then will hold there own court,Madoff will have a lawyer who will also ask for 12/13 years</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T01:05:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13942883</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13942883" />
    <title>Comment from zentec on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>zentec</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13935696" rel="nofollow">dragonfire81</a>:</p>
<p>I am not a lawyer.  But I think the truth in sentencing applies here meaning he gets pretty much 150 years.  Or as far his cold, dark, heart carries him.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T01:04:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13942415</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13942415" />
    <title>Comment from Jordan Leventhal on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jordan Leventhal</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13937446" rel="nofollow">sir_eccles</a>: This may be the first time I've ever called my dad over to look at a comment.  We both laughed out out at this one.</p>
<p>Give the man a star!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T00:48:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13942359</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13942359" />
    <title>Comment from Sheogorath on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sheogorath</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13938598" rel="nofollow">starrion</a>: <br />
We could draw and quarter him.  That's a good way of warning people.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T00:46:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13942319</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13942319" />
    <title>Comment from Sheogorath on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sheogorath</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13936456" rel="nofollow">drbtx1</a>: <br />
Actually, if that '14 year life expectancy' shtick his lawyer was pushing is right, he'll only serve about %10 in the federal system.</p>
<p>Fortunately Hell lasts for an eternity.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T00:45:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13942256</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13942256" />
    <title>Comment from ironchef on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>ironchef</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>I can't believe the wife gets to keep $2.5 Million.</p>
<p>I hope that money evaporates under the lawsuits and legal bills in store for her.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T00:43:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13941657</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13941657" />
    <title>Comment from cete-of-badgers on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>cete-of-badgers</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It kinda seems like in TV or movies that supervillains get away with their crimes for a long time, then either get killed or accept living the rest of their lives in prison. Madoff is old and lived well off of scamming people for a long time; he should just die in prison; none of this "negotiating for a lesser sentence" or "time off for good behavior" crap.</p>
<p>His entire family who got rich off of his scheme should go down too, but that's another story.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T00:24:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13940967</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13940967" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13936980" rel="nofollow">johnva</a>: That grates somewhat, considering some (many?) of his investors figured Madoff was pulling some kind of scam to maintain his returns, but a scam that conned everyone else, not his investors.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-30T00:02:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13940864</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13940864" />
    <title>Comment from LibertyReign on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>LibertyReign</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>So.. this leaves me wondering..when will Greenspan, Bernanke, and all the other Federal Ponzi schemers be sent to prison?</p>
<p>Madoff scams billions, but the federal reserve is allowed to have a Ponzi scheme operating in the trillions?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T23:59:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13940600</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13940600" />
    <title>Comment from Rectilinear Propagation on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rectilinear Propagation</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13935707" rel="nofollow">NotChoinski</a>: THIS</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T23:51:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13940467</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13940467" />
    <title>Comment from Gramin on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Gramin</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5303675/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years#c13940272" rel="nofollow">GreatWhiteNorth</a>:</p><br />
<p>Not every victim was as wealth as Steven Spielberg. Madoff didn't require a huge minimum investment. Some people had $100,000 or less (their life savings) invested with him and lost it all. Some people will do just fine losing that money but several have lost everything. You really should follow the story a bit more before making dumbass comments.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T23:48:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13940303</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13940303" />
    <title>Comment from morlo on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>morlo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13940261" rel="nofollow">EdnaLegume</a>: She lost a lot, and is left with only $3 million. It will be hard, but she is standing strong.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T23:44:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13940288</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13940288" />
    <title>Comment from craptastico on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>craptastico</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5303675/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years#c13936055" rel="nofollow">Snarkysnake</a>: don't forget this guy was one of the founders and chairmen of the NASDAQ. normally you shouldn't trust anyone with your money whole heartedly, this guy had the credentials, and knew his clients personally. it'd be like trusting your family reunion video with Steven Spielberg, so you can't really blame them</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T23:43:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13940272</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13940272" />
    <title>Comment from GreatWhiteNorth on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>GreatWhiteNorth</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sorry I can't feel the pain for those folks who got screwed by this guy.  I wish I had the money to have been a target for him then maybe I could feel their pain...</p>
<p>...hey, but, maybe I can get the money to be a target if Prince Farkuintbut needs help getting his money out of Africa!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T23:43:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13940261</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13940261" />
    <title>Comment from EdnaLegume on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>EdnaLegume</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>is his wife still living it up with the money from those scamvestments?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T23:43:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13939985</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13939985" />
    <title>Comment from Rectilinear Propagation on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rectilinear Propagation</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13938121" rel="nofollow">jc364</a>: Why didn't he disclose where the money is/went? You'd think if he actually wanted to get out of jail before he died he'd give up the info. It's not like he could spend it all himself.</p>
<p>Now they're just seizing everything they can get from him and his wife. I guess that explains why she didn't testify on his behalf.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T23:35:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13939867</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13939867" />
    <title>Comment from Rectilinear Propagation on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rectilinear Propagation</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote>the judge mentioned that no one - not "friends, family or other supporters had submitted any letters on Mr. Madoff's behalf, attesting to the strength of his character or good deeds he had done."</blockquote>
<p>Damn!</p>
<p>Well that says it all, doesn't it?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T23:31:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13939623</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13939623" />
    <title>Comment from albear on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>albear</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Should be nice if it REALLY was 150 years. I bet this scumbag will be let out in 12 years for good behavior or pity for getting old behind bars. We need truth in sentencing. If they sentence him for 150 years, he should be there until he dies.</p><br />
<p>I was feeling bad for the "victims" at first, but not so much now because they were greedy too.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T23:25:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13939521</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13939521" />
    <title>Comment from m4ximusprim3 on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>m4ximusprim3</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13937200" rel="nofollow">pollyannacowgirl</a>: In addition to the other reasons listed above, his whole goal now is to have the rest of his family avoid prosecution/public exposure. He knows he's going down, so the faster they dump him in a hole and cnn forgets about him, the less inquiry there will be about how his sons made 3-4 mil a year and had "no idea" that anything was amiss.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T23:22:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13939128</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13939128" />
    <title>Comment from vladthepaler on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>vladthepaler</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Good. I just hope he doesn't serve his 150 years in a country club.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T23:12:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13938920</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13938920" />
    <title>Comment from dragonfire81 on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>dragonfire81</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13937533" rel="nofollow">Elcheecho</a>: WHAT???? Isn't the purpose of sentencing to deter others from committing the same offense?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T23:05:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13938780</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13938780" />
    <title>Comment from takes_so_little on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>takes_so_little</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Good.  Rot.</p>
<p>I can't escape the sneaking suspicion that for every Ken Lay/Bernie Madoff etc. wealthy person who gets made an example of for the satisfaction of the masses, there are dozens more who operate above the law.  Hope I'm wrong.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T23:00:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13938701</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13938701" />
    <title>Comment from mac-phisto on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>mac-phisto</name>
        <uri>http://n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13937446" rel="nofollow">sir_eccles</a>: rofl!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:57:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13938661</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13938661" />
    <title>Comment from mac-phisto on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>mac-phisto</name>
        <uri>http://n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13936017" rel="nofollow">blueneon</a>: as far as i'm concerned, there are no white collar crimes. this man is a thief. throw him away. he's of no use to society any more.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:56:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13938653</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13938653" />
    <title>Comment from ludwigk on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>ludwigk</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13936017" rel="nofollow">blueneon</a>: His crime was perpetrated over the course of 20 years. So, maybe we're comparing one count of murder (which as you said might be ~10 years), to dozens of counts of fraud, which each carry 4-6 years and must be served consecutively?</p>
<p>The article doesn't seem to have any details about the reasoning behind his sentencing, besides that it is meant to act as a deterrent.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:56:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13938598</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13938598" />
    <title>Comment from starrion on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>starrion</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Let him die in prison.</p><br />
<p>Then bronze his shriveled carcass and set him up on Wall Street as a warning to others.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:54:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13938211</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13938211" />
    <title>Comment from ludwigk on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>ludwigk</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13937286" rel="nofollow">wgrune</a>: It's too bad that he'll die LONG before serving any appreciable amount of his sentence. He's physically incapable of serving his time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:44:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13938121</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13938121" />
    <title>Comment from jc364 on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>jc364</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Nothing says "I'm sorry" like 20 years of swindling and then hiding the money so it can't be given back to the people it was stolen from.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:42:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13937952</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13937952" />
    <title>Comment from coolteamblt on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>coolteamblt</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I'm just thrilled that the judge practically spat on his request for what, like, ten years? That's awesome. I just hope he doesn't get it reduced or get parole.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:37:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13937748</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13937748" />
    <title>Comment from trujunglist on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>trujunglist</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>"I'm not actually sorry, otherwise I never would've stolen all of your money and ruined your lives. It's completely devoid of meaning to even say it at this point, so I think I can actually say it without making Satan cry. I will turn and face you. I am sorry. I know that doesn't help you."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:31:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13937533</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13937533" />
    <title>Comment from Elcheecho on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Elcheecho</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13936548" rel="nofollow">Scrutinizer</a>: didn't the supreme court recently rule against sentencing based on sending a message to others?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:25:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13937446</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13937446" />
    <title>Comment from sir_eccles on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>sir_eccles</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>All he needs to do is find 10 people willing to serve a year each in his place, and if each of those 10 find another ten each...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:22:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13937400</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13937400" />
    <title>Comment from Righteous on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Righteous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13936753" rel="nofollow">Righteous</a>: Damn it!  Now I'm being scammed by this damn computer and network.  My first post never appeared and then poof! there it is.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:20:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13937368</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13937368" />
    <title>Comment from johnva on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>johnva</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13937200" rel="nofollow">pollyannacowgirl</a>: I think federal criminal court often takes less time. Remember how fast Tim McVeigh went from arrest to execution?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:19:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13937359</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13937359" />
    <title>Comment from BuddyGuyMontag on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>BuddyGuyMontag</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5303675/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years#c13937200" rel="nofollow">pollyannacowgirl</a>: Uh, he pleaded guilty. No trial.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:19:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13937336</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13937336" />
    <title>Comment from wgrune on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>wgrune</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5303675/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years#c13936916" rel="nofollow">dave_coder</a>:</p><br />
<p>He wont be eligible for parole until he is 191.</p><br />
<p><a href="http://cnnwire.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/29/madoff-sentenced-to-150-years-in-prison/" rel="nofollow">[cnnwire.blogs.cnn.com]</a></p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:18:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13937286</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13937286" />
    <title>Comment from wgrune on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>wgrune</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5303675/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years#c13935858" rel="nofollow">bohemian</a>:</p><br />
<p>"...under current rules in federal court, a person must serve at least 80 percent of a sentence - 120 years - prior to being eligible for parole. That would mean Madoff would have to live until he was 191 years old before being eligible for parole."</p><br />
<p><a href="http://cnnwire.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/29/madoff-sentenced-to-150-years-in-prison/" rel="nofollow">[cnnwire.blogs.cnn.com]</a></p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:16:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13937260</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13937260" />
    <title>Comment from tailstoo on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>tailstoo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13935707" rel="nofollow">NotChoinski</a>: I would love this!  Worth $65 billion.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:16:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13937200</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13937200" />
    <title>Comment from pollyannacowgirl on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>pollyannacowgirl</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Is it just me, or did he receive justice VERY swiftly? He was exposed in December, and less than a year later, he's convicted and sentenced.</p><br />
<p>I'm not complaining, but I always thought the justice system moved a lot more slowly. Or do the wealthy get bumped to the head of the line, too?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:13:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13936980</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13936980" />
    <title>Comment from johnva on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>johnva</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13935858" rel="nofollow">bohemian</a>: Not to mention that, he will end up costing the government money too, since people will be able to write off their losses. That means he was indirectly stealing from all of us, not just his "investors".</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:07:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13936916</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13936916" />
    <title>Comment from dave_coder on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>dave_coder</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>So wait. I'm sure that he'll be eligible for parole soon and since this isn't a violent crime perhaps it would be better to fine him and put him to work instead of having him sit in jail for the rest of his life.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:06:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13936753</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13936753" />
    <title>Comment from Righteous on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Righteous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>He isn't sorry.  If he were, he would disclose all parties involved in this scam in an effort to return as much money as possible to the investors.  However, that isn't happening.  Like I said, he isn't sorry.  Let him hang.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:01:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13936724</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13936724" />
    <title>Comment from Righteous on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Righteous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>He isn't sorry.  If he were, he'd fully disclose all parties involved in this scam in an attempt to make things as right as possible.  It's apparent that isn't happening.  Like I said, he isn't sorry.  Let him hang.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T22:00:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13936701</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13936701" />
    <title>Comment from BreadBoy on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>BreadBoy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think he should be <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caning_in_Singapore" rel="nofollow"><b>caned</b></a>-often.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T21:59:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13936548</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13936548" />
    <title>Comment from Scrutinizer on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Scrutinizer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5303675/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years#c13936017" rel="nofollow">blueneon</a>:Most of the women who kill their children do so because they are suffering from some psychological problems. While this does not accuse their behavior it does mitigate their culpability and knowledge of their acts is more punishment than anything the courts could hand out. A long sentence would serve no purpose.</p><br />
<p>In the case of finical fraud a long sentence is a warning to every other would be schemer. This does serve societies purposes by preventing future crimes.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T21:54:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13936456</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13936456" />
    <title>Comment from drbtx1 on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>drbtx1</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c13935858" rel="nofollow">bohemian</a>: In the federal system, he will have to serve 85% of his sentence.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T21:51:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13936140</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13936140" />
    <title>Comment from JayCutlerhurtsmyhead on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>JayCutlerhurtsmyhead</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>He's been watching Shawshank Redemption and crying at the end when he realizes that he's not actually innocent and deserves no boat on a beach.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T21:40:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13936087</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13936087" />
    <title>Comment from katstermonster on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>katstermonster</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5303675/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years#c13935707" rel="nofollow">NotChoinski</a>: +1</p><br />
<p>best. idea. ever.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T21:38:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13936055</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13936055" />
    <title>Comment from Snarkysnake on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Snarkysnake</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I hope that medical science ensures that he does every day of this sentence.He is kind of an avatar for the whole rotten Wall Street structure of this point in history. That said...</p>
<p>A LOT of his victims could have asked themselves how this guy could be up in down markets and up more in up markets without being able to explain how he "invested" their money.This is just not logical.When I have a couple of million on the line and that is the sum of my wealth , you better believe that no one person gets all of it , and if they say "trust me" , I'm outta there.</p>
<p>I hope that his cellmate has a "thing" for balding old guys.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T21:37:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13936017</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13936017" />
    <title>Comment from blueneon on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>blueneon</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I understand the gravity of what he did, and the damage Maddoff caused to people. What I don't understand is why men (primarily) get massive sentences for what is called white collar crimes, when people who kill their small children get away with terms of 10 years or less sometimes. Sometimes I wonder about our judicial system.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T21:36:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13935999</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13935999" />
    <title>Comment from Mondoz on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mondoz</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I wonder how long it will take him before he's running scams on the prisoners in jail...</p>
<p>"If you invest those cigarettes with me at 15%, in no time, you'll be earning more free smokes than you know what to do with!  Trust me!"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T21:35:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13935942</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13935942" />
    <title>Comment from RanChan03 on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>RanChan03</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>YAY keep his ass in prison</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T21:33:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13935924</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13935924" />
    <title>Comment from JonThomasDesigns on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>JonThomasDesigns</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Haha so much of the 12/13 years he wanted</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T21:33:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13935878</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13935878" />
    <title>Comment from DefineStatutory on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>DefineStatutory</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c13935696" rel="nofollow">dragonfire81</a>:</p><br />
<p>Nope. This isn't in L.A.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T21:31:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13935858</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13935858" />
    <title>Comment from bohemian on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>bohemian</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Is he eligible for parole or early release? I really don't want this guy to ever get out. He didn't technically kill anyone, but his actions pushed a few to kill themselves. The scope of massive damage he did to people's financial lives is staggering. You really only have one portion of your life to earn money. If someone had that savings all taken away later in life they are going to be hard pressed to regain that wealth.</p>
<p>Madoff's actions are a major threat to society since so much of our society is built on the power of money even in the small scale of being able to live with some shred of dignity.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T21:31:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13935707</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13935707" />
    <title>Comment from NotChoinski on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>NotChoinski</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I expect his head in a jar to appear on the new 'Futurama'</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T21:25:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675-comment:13935696</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5303675" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/06/madoff-eligible-to-scam-again-in-only-150-years.html#c13935696" />
    <title>Comment from dragonfire81 on 2009-06-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>dragonfire81</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Is this one of those things where he will eventually be able to appeal it down to like 8 years plus time served?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-29T21:25:10Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



