@RvLeshrac:

I can't believe you Godwin'ed a WCIA thread

There's always next year...

I don't blame GM for needing $ now. Forecasting future economic conditions is akin to solving the riddles of alchemy. But seeing that they weren't producing a desirable product mix and then mimicking their top competitors should have been doable.

@Hadoken3: I vote for GM. When they come to the podium to accept their trophy, the UAW should come up to the stage with them to accept the award.

Heh Heh... well said

Also, I love all these people talking about fees. What fees? Baggage? Is that it? You didn't get a meal in your last 3-hour flight? OH MY, IT'S A NIGHTMARE! I'm thinking most of these people don't even fly and are just parroting what they read. As someone who flies 40-60k miles a year, flying is an underwhelming experience unless on a UAE flight or other luxury airline, but it's certainly not awful. Eat before you get to the airport and stop whining. Bring a collapsable water bottle. Seriously.

However, if United wants to fly to Washington to beg for money, they -probably- have a better chance at getting there without people getting upset over the fact they flew there. Since they're an airline and not a horribly run car company.

I voted United, but in my heart I think GM is going to the final four.

Also, can anybody list the "nickel and diming" services outside of baggage? Anybody? Come on! You all talk about it so much! It must be infinitely common on United!

Vanno says United Airlines (#5305) is much worse than GM (#240).

United. But I'm biased due to the last time I flew them.

GM has never stranded me in an airport on a layover when they knew there'd be no way for me to get out.

GM has never 'pushed-off' from the gate when they knew that we'd be sitting on the tarmac for three or four hours with no food or water or working toilets.

Yeah, GM is struggling and perhaps even stupid. And I resent my tax dollars going to bail them out, but that's no different than all of the other places politicians are spending my tax dollars.

UNITED can be just plain evil to its customers, which is a hallmark of the Worst Company in America.
.

So I'm voting against United here because they ripped me off for ~65k FF miles with little to no warning. That will keep pissing me off for many years to come.

Protect my *future* tax dollars by letting GM die, please :D

I vote GM. I choose not to do business with United, and they are easily avoidable. My tax dollars going to GM is being done without my consent.

:)

@Blinky987: Calling GM's lineup bloated is one thing, and very accurate, but crummy is completely different. They sell cars that both top (CTS) and bottom (Aveo) their respective classes, with a number of vehicles covering the rest of range. Anyone looking at a new Camry (top selling car in the US) and not cross-shopping it with a new Malibu is only doing themself a disservice. Chrysler, on the other hand, has a crummy lineup.

If we assume that the suckiness of *nominated* companies follows a bell-shaped curve, and the contest only involves the 32 companies with the most nominations, then our entire field of finalists is drawn from the right side of the curve. Of these, perhaps half a dozen are far out on the tail of the curve and are super-sucky. The other couple dozen finalists are drawn more from the bulk of the bell, and are of comparable suckiness. In this model the first half dozen or so contests would be extremely lopsided, but then the matches would become more even. I'd expect matches 10-16 of the first round would not be blow-outs.

Then there's the interesting third category. You said, "don't like it, don't fly United". But, for example, you can't say that with most telecoms (local monopoly *cough* Comcast *cough*) or even the likes of Microsoft (functionally a monopoly).

Just throwing that out there. Still, these days I think even they'd rank a distant second to GM, AIG, et al.

On the other hand, the last GM product I owned needed a major repair every 2000 miles. I'm having a hard time giving that company any sympathy.

United on the other hand, is making conscious decisions that screw their own customers by "nickel and diming", and then providing horrendous customer service.

@razremytuxbuddy: Excellent argument. I was on the fence and you sold me!

Demand is demand. Supply does not create demand. People bought SUVs because of tax breaks and because the people wanted them. Auto manufacturers pushed them because they're profitable. If you think the SUV was imposed upon America, I'm sure you're full of even more crazy conspiracy theories. Lucky for you (and unlucky for us normals), the internet is a perfect place for you.

@Harry Pothead: Your second sentence is not a proper conclusion to your first. I drive a German car. GM's antiquated views and policies have little to no effect on me. It would be pretty damn hard to argue that GM has some sort of peer-pressure like influence on European automakers.

@RvLeshrac: RvLeshrac has it right. That's exactly what I mean.

Some companies are simply poorly run. I am not forced to use them, and I choose not to. I'm not going to whine that United charges fees for services. If you don't like it, don't fly United. It's that easy.

On the other hand, I am going to be forced into subsidizing GM in some way as an American. Before this near collapse, I could just buy my Honda/Toyota (or even Mazda, of which Ford is a 33% owner) and be fine. GM is imposing itself upon me with its crummy cars and bloated lineup. Maybe they'll actually be able to cut those terrible lines in the face of "OMG LAYOFFS! THINK OF THE PEOPLE!" idiots (they are being told to cut every single profitable automobile iirc because they're not enviro-friendly), but that has yet to be seen. Anyway, I digress.

GM is forcing itself upon me. United isn't. I don't care that United wants to sell me a sandwich for $5. It probably costs $8 from a vendor in the terminal anyway, and I can simply choose not to buy it. People seem to lose touch with this fact.

Let's see... one of these companies has stolen my tax money, as they have no plans to pay it back, and hasn't used it for anything at all worthwhile.

The other one loses some luggage and charges you for a service you *don't have to pay for if you simply choose not to fly with them*.

C'mon. Where's the *tough* choice, like AIG vs. Hitler?

1. I think it is unAmerican for GM to have for decades, produced a product that hasn't measured up to foreign competition, but used a "buy American" campaign to shame Americans into buying its product anyway. Then there's their contribution to the virtual meltdown of the consumer credit industry, with their financing gimmicks designed to boost new car sales.

2. GM now thinks it is so important to America that American taxpayers should bail it out at all costs. (Note to GM: America is the land of opportunity; not the land of corporate handouts.)

3. While United will likely be in the running for WCIA next year, I'm not sure GM will still be around. This may be my only chance to vote for GM.

@josephbloseph:

He's saying that some of these companies are objectively much worse than the others. Since the title of the awards is "Worst Company in America," not "Worst Customer Service In America," the comparison to Blackwater isn't off-base.

In a fight for "Worst Company in America," we have United and GM. Since United isn't taking money from the taxpayers (with no plans to pay it back), and didn't just get beaten over the head by the POTUS, it should be ridiculously obvious which of these is the "worst".

UA is a "Worst Company" contender in the sense that they ream their customers over. GM is a "Worst Company" contender in that it can't keep itself in business.

It's a hard call to make. I chose GM, because at least UA can keep itself in business (for now).

Not everyone flies, but pretty much all Americans drive cars. So we're all affected by General Motors and its policies.
If it weren't for GM, we'd be driving electric cars now, or cars that get 55+ miles per gallon. For 20 years they have shoved their over-priced fuel-hog road-hog SUVs down our throats, because they didn't want to bother with anything else. They made too much profit on SUVs and their over-priced luxury cars. Well I think America has finally spoken, we don't want SUVs. Give us cars that are economically and environmentally responsible, or we'll buy them somewhere else.
Will the last person to leave Detroit please turn out the lights?

@AmosChrysaor: Oh Really, they have a huge contract with Mr. Government to ship soliders sailers and seamen overseas =)

.... well too good because they are in $$ trouble. Not the best managed company, but far from being "worst" or bad in any way.

UA - lets milk every cent from every passenger. ugh, bad. United Airlines is easily the worst of these 2.

In the end I voted for GM simply because even after we bailed them out late last eyar they still failed to do anything meaningful enough so as to convince the government and public that it's a reliable business.

The fact that you could choose an airline other than United is irrelevant. The fact that people do choose other airlines, and their reasons for it are what is important. Whether it is one or two high profile cases in which passengers were profiled, abused, or threatened and detained, those are what we are looking at. I'm voting for GM, but I think you've missed a large portion of the spirit of the bracket.

Like, United isn't really that bad. There are an infinite amount of air carriers that you may use if you don't like United. Fly someone else. We would be dumb to use a business we hated in such a competitive marketplace, fortress hubs aside.

On the other hand, we American readers are going to be forced bedfellows with General Motors. If they were simply a poor company, that's their problem. Again, we would be dumb to do business with them for their mediocre cards. However, they currently provide too many jobs and the whole situation is one giant ball of systemtic risk similar to the financial industry problem. They have taken the problems from their poor market position and bad business practices and put them on us.

I vote GM. United can't possibly be evil here.

GM, for sure. I don't see them going all the way, but GM wins this round handily.

Would I be wrong in thinking that United is a government-supported Airline?

So is this the United Airlines vs. The Government?

Never thought I'd side with United...

I'm going to have to go with the Airline as they suck. GM is trying to stay afloat, with our help, but they have made some piss poor decisions . .