<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T13:00:59Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for <![CDATA[Worst Company In America: AT&amp;T VS Circuit City]]></title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5200855" title="Worst Company In America: AT&amp;T VS Circuit City" />
    <published>2009-04-07T01:48:27Z</published>
    <updated>2009-04-07T03:02:36Z</updated>
    <title>Worst Company In America: AT&amp;T VS Circuit City</title>
    <summary>--&gt;The death star vs a bankrupt, liquidated retailer in its final year of eligibility? Who makes you angry?</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Meg Marco</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term=" E-commerce" />
    
    <category term="AT&amp;T" />
    
    <category term="Worst Company In America" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[
<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/31/2009/04/wciaattcc.jpg"  width="804" height="150" style="display:block;float:none;" />-->The death star vs a bankrupt, liquidated retailer in its <strong>final year of eligibility?</strong> Who makes you angry?</p>
<p>It's #15 <a href="http://consumerist.com/tag/att">AT&T</a> VS #18 <a href="http://consumerist.com/tag/circuit%20city">Circuit City</a>:<br>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" language="javascript" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/1520119.js">
</script><noscript><a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/1520119/">Which Company Is Worse?</a><br>
<span style="font-size:9px;">( <a href="http://www.polldaddy.com">online surveys</a>)</span></noscript><br>
<em>This is a post in our <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WORST COMPANY IN AMERICA" href="http://consumerist.com/tag/worst-company-in-america/">Worst Company In America</a> 2009 series. The companies nominated for this honor were chosen by you, the readers, and seeded according to number of nominations. Keep track of all the goings on at <a href="http://consumerist.com/tag/worst-company-in-america">consumerist.com/tag/worst-company-in-america.</a> Download the <a href="http://consumerist.com/5180539/behold-the-2009-worst-company-in-america-bracket">bracket here.</a></em></p>
]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11969571</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11969571" />
    <title>Comment from lemmor on 2009-04-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>lemmor</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wow, as of right now it is tied at 50%.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-09T22:50:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11958773</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11958773" />
    <title>Comment from I&apos;m Sorry, You&apos;re Wrong. on 2009-04-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>I&apos;m Sorry, You&apos;re Wrong.</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11939408" rel="nofollow">ehlaren</a>: Well said! This is pathetic that this is even a competition. Must be all those Gizmodo regulars coming here to vent their frustration w/ a gadget store.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-09T10:22:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11954197</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11954197" />
    <title>Comment from snclfe on 2009-04-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>snclfe</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If Circuit City wins.....so do the terrorists!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-09T05:07:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11946648</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11946648" />
    <title>Comment from consumerd on 2009-04-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>consumerd</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11898135" rel="nofollow">clyde55</a>:</p>
<p>Might try talking to these guys. They make themselves available for AT&amp;T complaints.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/sbcdirect" rel="nofollow">[www.dslreports.com]</a></p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-09T00:44:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11942692</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11942692" />
    <title>Comment from Poisonthescene on 2009-04-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Poisonthescene</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11891224" rel="nofollow">j-o-h-n</a>: 2 days later and still 49:51. Really tough decision apparently.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-08T23:04:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11939408</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11939408" />
    <title>Comment from ehlaren on 2009-04-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>ehlaren</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think it is pretty sad and an indicator of the society we live in where people have to even contemplate between these two 'evils'.</p>
<p>A store that sells non essential luxury items v.s.<br />
a company that could care less about anything other the then bottom line, even when it comes to civil and human rights.</p>
<p>Seriously, here is to a better shopping experience. Long live American Consumerism.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-08T21:41:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11913240</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11913240" />
    <title>Comment from shalegac on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>shalegac</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I actually did alright at times with Circut City. It was their total lack of product knowledge that helped me.</p><br />
<p>I took back an HD-DVD player as it was being declared dead. I exchanged it for the PS3. The employee said "good move, HD-DVD doesn't have as many titles." They then handed me the three movies I got in the HD-DVD box and said, "oops, you almost forgot those".</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T23:05:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11912594</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11912594" />
    <title>Comment from Radi0logy on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Radi0logy</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11906468" rel="nofollow">mariospants</a>: Wow. CC has pulled ahead. Consider me impressed.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T22:46:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11909912</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11909912" />
    <title>Comment from snclfe on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>snclfe</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Seriously...Circuit City is in the lead at 51%??!?!?</p>
<p>Painfully inept customer service coupled with blissfully ignorant management that is six feet under shouldn't be leading over a company that wiped it's ass with the constitution!</p>
<p>If CC wins this round I'm nominating consumerist for worst Blog readership in America.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T21:32:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11908964</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11908964" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is very easy for me. I go with AT&T, because of their all around store rep arrogance (they used to say every time you called them "welcome to AT&T the only network good enough for the iphone" no shit), and all around terrible coverage. Satan and T for the win! Or the lose if you will.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T21:07:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11907597</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11907597" />
    <title>Comment from theblackdog on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>theblackdog</name>
        <uri>http://theblackdog2071.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://theblackdog2071.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T because they still exist and they convinced Apple to only let them offer the iPhone.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T20:28:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11906844</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11906844" />
    <title>Comment from vladthepaler on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>vladthepaler</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Circuit City doesn't exist anymore. AT&amp;T enables warrantless wiretapping. Seems lkke an easy call, I'm surprised how close this is running.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T20:05:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11906468</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11906468" />
    <title>Comment from mariospants on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>mariospants</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5200855/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city#c11891190" rel="nofollow">Radi0logy</a>: This IS a hard decision to make. The thing is, I wonder if either one could go to the final round. I doubt it, especially as our most recent CC bitching comes courtesy of the jackasses who ran the liquidation (I still wonder if that family got a refund on their broken TV) and AT&amp;T likely still has customers it hasn't pissed off yet.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T19:50:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11905718</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11905718" />
    <title>Comment from Corporate_guy on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Corporate_guy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Should have put the liquidator on here, and not circuit city.  The liquidator is the company people hate the most.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T19:25:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11905628</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11905628" />
    <title>Comment from Ninjanice on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ninjanice</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I voted AT&amp;T. They suck and a lot of their customers don't have a choice but to use their service. CC sucked, but at least people had the option of shopping elsewhere.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T19:22:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11905083</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11905083" />
    <title>Comment from ub on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>ub</name>
        <uri>http://www.none.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.none.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11899932" rel="nofollow">sprocket79</a>: No PM on these forums, but you could use Lifehacker's suggestion of sc.rim: <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5190772/scrim-shares-your-email-on-the-internet-protects-it-from-spambots" rel="nofollow">[lifehacker.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T19:03:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11904361</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11904361" />
    <title>Comment from tetris2 on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>tetris2</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11901471" rel="nofollow">snclfe</a>: And... CC is up 51-49.  Amazing the ignorance of some people.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T18:38:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11904288</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11904288" />
    <title>Comment from UnicornMaster on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>UnicornMaster</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Circuit City is dead. Why beat a dead horse?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T18:35:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11903892</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11903892" />
    <title>Comment from T Axel Jones on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>T Axel Jones</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5200855/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city?skyline=true&amp;s=x#c11891465" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: Agreed. Aiding in the violation of privacy rights &gt; poor customer service.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T18:15:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11903407</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11903407" />
    <title>Comment from Radi0logy on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Radi0logy</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11897683" rel="nofollow">ajlei</a>: still.. bad customer service vs. breaking your rights.. its not really comparable :P</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T17:41:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11902920</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11902920" />
    <title>Comment from jeffbone on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>jeffbone</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5200855/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city#c11898972" rel="nofollow">HiPwr</a>: Half, or I daresay, most of the people on this site won't understand the references or your implication that it actually used to be OK to smoke aboard aircraft.</p><br />
<p>/get off my lawn!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T16:42:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11902895</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11902895" />
    <title>Comment from jeffbone on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>jeffbone</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5200855/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city#c11899932" rel="nofollow">sprocket79</a>: Seems like involving your state's AG, USPS Postal Inspectors (since they claimed the checked were "mailed"), or both would be appropriate at this juncture.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T16:38:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11902668</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11902668" />
    <title>Comment from Jonax on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jonax</name>
        <uri>http://www.monkeynoir.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.monkeynoir.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>This could be the closest of the tournament.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T15:54:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11901471</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11901471" />
    <title>Comment from snclfe on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>snclfe</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Did Circuit City betray the Bill of Rights?  <br />
And even if CC were even remotely on-par with the un-American evils of AT&amp;T - they're dead and in the ground - who cares?  I can't believe this is a close as it is!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T11:54:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11900530</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11900530" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I used to work for AT&T and they're horrible. They used to have this "SLM" progam for mobile phones - service limit monitoring for people with bad credit. People would make calls and then have to call in and make a payment when they got to their service limit-when their bill got to a certain limit. The thing was, the plan discounts - like free weekend minutes or evenings, etc wouldn't kick in and adjust the bill until the end of the month-so they'd ask people to pay thousands through the month and then make those people beg to get it back-sometimes they'd hold thousands of dollars on an account as credit for six months or more. Telling people they needed to send canceled checks or debit card statements showing they'd made the payments. It was a scam of poor people, mostly blacks I know because I used to talk to them. This was before the day of prepaid phones and this was the only thing you could do to get a mobile phone if you had bad credit. It also encouraged a lot of fraud-stolen credit card numbers used, false account numbers, stolen check account numbers-anything to get the phones back on. 
Also I wish I could give you all the emails they sent us pumping AT&T wireless stock to employees. Telling us to buy. Sending us articles from people writing (presumably paid by AT&T) for the Washington Post (supposedly financial writers) saying AWE stands for awesome!  Telling us how great it was that we were going to get to buy the IPO withou paying fees as IPO's were usually only offered to special investors spending more than $100k. So many employees fell for the line and mortgaged their homes thinking they were getting in on some Silicon Valley type deal that was going to make them millionaires. I remember the talk around the company-in the elevator, etc. It made me sad that people were so naive. AT&T issued more market shares than any company in history, in other words it was very diluted, and it was the first IPO where all shares weren't sold by opening day as there were just so many. That stock gained slightly for a few weeks- a few dollars a share- and then continued to fall and never recovered. 
Another time I paid my employee cell phone $5. They deposited the check but said it was for $500 and it was cashed for that. They refused to refund the money. I bounced three checks that month because of their error. I hadn't ever bounced a check before or after this incident. They suggested I let it sit on my account. It would have taken more than ten years for the credit to be used. I ended up having to threaten to take my own company to court after waiting for the refund for six months. The woman in Orlando in charge of returning the money complained to my supervisor and I got in trouble. 
I can tell you so many stories like this. About how they help perpetuate identity theft, steal from customers, lie to employees. AT&T is just flat out unethical-thieves. Take it from an insider and do not do business with them. CC was bad, but AT&T has been bad forever-they've been in business near a century-screwing people the whole time. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T09:52:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11900270</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11900270" />
    <title>Comment from Aaron Longchamps on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Aaron Longchamps</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>They're both at 50% right now, which I find hilarious.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T09:29:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11899932</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11899932" />
    <title>Comment from sprocket79 on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>sprocket79</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11895560" rel="nofollow">MormonChristmas_GitEmSteveDave</a>: They lied to you. I also got an email that says that my rebate was approved and a check mailed.</p>
<p>They company that handled the rebate is called Parago. I called the rebate hotline a zillion times. I asked for supervisors and was hung up on. I finally annoyed the guy so much that he told me that a lot of checks were cut, but none of them mailed. He said to be patient and eventually they would be mailed. Lies. All lies. I even wrote an email to the CEO and it was ignored. Is there a way to PM on this thing? Maybe we should trade info about what we know about the rebates.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T09:02:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11899241</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11899241" />
    <title>Comment from nudger on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>nudger</name>
        <uri>http://www.vanno.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.vanno.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Vanno users <a href="http://blog.vanno.com/index.php/2009/03/25/vanno-predicts-round-1-of-the-consumerist-2009-worst-company-in-america-bracket/" rel="nofollow">say</a> Circuit City (#5867) over AT&amp;T (#794).</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T08:09:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11899137</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11899137" />
    <title>Comment from I&apos;m Sorry, You&apos;re Wrong. on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>I&apos;m Sorry, You&apos;re Wrong.</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is easy. AT&amp;T struck a deal with the Bush Administration to build a secret room in AT&amp;T HQ to spy on American communications and then lobbied Congress to pass a law giving them blanket immunity for violating a variety of US privacy and communication laws to cover up their participation in this illegal and unconstitutional program. What did Circuit City do again?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T08:04:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11898972</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11898972" />
    <title>Comment from HiPwr on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>HiPwr</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>It's so pointless putting companies that no longer exist in these polls. I'm waiting for Braniff Airlines vs. Eastern Airlines. I vote for Eastern because the stewardesses never had a light for my cigarette while I was flying.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T07:54:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11898135</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11898135" />
    <title>Comment from clyde55 on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>clyde55</name>
        <uri>http://clydestuff.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://clydestuff.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T for me.  I've been in a year long dispute over my phone bill, plus they have been overcharging me almost continuously on my Dish network bill which they handled.</p>
<p>I got nowhere with that for a while.  It's almost impossible to get someone in customer service, and if I try calling Dish Network directly, I still get AT&amp;T.  Don't know how they are pulling that one off.</p>
<p>I finally made headway when I was able to use the chat feature on Dish to talk to someone.  He agreed I was being overcharged, at least $10 a month, possibly more. So I'm going to have unbundle my AT&amp;T package and find other alternatives now that my contract is fulfilled.  But they'll probably argue about that too.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T06:59:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11897683</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11897683" />
    <title>Comment from ajlei on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>ajlei</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11891190" rel="nofollow">Radi0logy</a>: Complete opposite sentiment here. I've had ATT/Cingular before that for the past eight years and I've never had issue.</p>
<p>Circuit City, on the other hand, certainly burned me a few times, most notably with their 24-minute guarantee. The time I couldn't find any employees around the store only to find them in the DVD section playing "hoops" with the DVDs into a bargain bin, that was pretty memorable as well.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T06:32:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11897646</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11897646" />
    <title>Comment from sodomanaz on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>sodomanaz</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11891384" rel="nofollow">noone1569</a>: I dunno, I like AT&amp;T.  :p</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T06:31:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11897616</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11897616" />
    <title>Comment from Andrew Mussey on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Andrew Mussey</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11891224" rel="nofollow">j-o-h-n</a>: Yep!  Still stuck there.  I don't know how to fill out my chart...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T06:29:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11896556</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11896556" />
    <title>Comment from Ellen Wiegand on 2009-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ellen Wiegand</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11892749" rel="nofollow">logicalnoise</a>:</p>
<p>Government in the 80s: AT&amp;T, you're too big, you're a monopoly (over phones only), we'll have to break you up into baby bells</p>
<p>AT&amp;T in the 00s: Government, can we please buy up the largest bell, a cable/ DSL provider, and one of the largest cell phone carriers in the US?</p>
<p>Govt: Sure, why not??</p>
<p>How much money changed hands for that deal to go through?<br />
Bell south was so great too, before AT&amp;T took it back. AT&amp;T FTW!!!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T05:27:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11896016</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11896016" />
    <title>Comment from biswalt on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>biswalt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c11895247" rel="nofollow">Overheal</a>: Yeah it took stones to file for bankruptcy instead of asking for aide from a governmental program they don't qualify for.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T04:53:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11895903</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11895903" />
    <title>Comment from razremytuxbuddy on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>razremytuxbuddy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Don't waste a vote on a company that doesn't exist anymore.  There's no CC to deliver the trophy to.  Besides that, AT&amp;T is many times more evil than CC.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T04:47:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11895560</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11895560" />
    <title>Comment from MormonChristmas_GitEmSteveDave on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>MormonChristmas_GitEmSteveDave</name>
        <uri>http://www.CanItKillTheGrimace.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.CanItKillTheGrimace.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11892067" rel="nofollow">sprocket79</a>: Well, according to the company that handled the rebate, they cut a check and sent it out, but I don't know how to get in touch with them.  I sent an email in to Consumerist, as they seem to have helped some people, but no response yet.  I might actually start pounding the grass morrow to find out some info.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T04:31:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11895345</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11895345" />
    <title>Comment from AgentTuttle on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>AgentTuttle</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wow, 50/50? At&amp;t IS the entity who cooperated with the NSA and Bush to illegally wire tap innocent Americans. Maybe there should be a new poll for most evil company, GE or At&amp;t?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T04:21:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11895247</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11895247" />
    <title>Comment from Overheal on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Overheal</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>CC was a bad company, but unlike anybody else in this day and age, they had the stones to file for bankruptcy, not cry TARP TARP TARP.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T04:17:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11895203</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11895203" />
    <title>Comment from chrylis on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>chrylis</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11891937" rel="nofollow">JGKojak</a>: This is what tipped it for me.  AT&amp;T has monopolies in so many markets (not just geographical, but level-of-service as well) because of the infrastructure it built off the back of a government-sanctioned monopoly, and they treat even their enormous customers like dirt.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T04:15:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11895202</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11895202" />
    <title>Comment from The_Legend on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>The_Legend</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>AT&amp;T all the way. 504 seconds while they fumble around and then they drop your call. That netbook deal at RatShack is workin out real good for them...as long as you have 5 grand for data charges.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T04:15:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11895122</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11895122" />
    <title>Comment from ShadowFalls on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>ShadowFalls</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11891257" rel="nofollow">MormonChristmas_GitEmSteveDave</a>:</p>
<p>I want to know too, more especially, how much % off the award is gonna be!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T04:11:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11895076</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11895076" />
    <title>Comment from sqwigeebo on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>sqwigeebo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>My vote goes to Circuit City. Circuit City has hurt the American public more than we know. With it's inability to stay competitive as well as it's failure to update it's infrastructure from the mid 80's, it was no wonder why the company went under. As a staple, Circuit City had a responsibility to stay relevant to be there and regulate prices within the big box retail category, but failed in every which way, and now have left the American consumer open to a monopoly by Best Buy (not saying that Best Buy totally sucks). Batman doesn't work without a Joker folks, simple as that. Circuit City has also hurt our economy by failing to react in time. As profits fell and market share started going towards Best Buy, it seems like Circuit City only started reacting when their stock was downgraded first being kicked out of the S&amp;P 500, then out of the NYSE within the same year. By the end of it's life, Circuit City who was once the kid to cheat off of in class, turned into the one cheating, and at that, cheated off the dumb kid in class. On the way out Circuit City swung the door open and as a last show left slow enough to get hit in its own backside with the doorknob.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T04:09:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11895074</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11895074" />
    <title>Comment from Papa Midnight on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Papa Midnight</name>
        <uri>http://www.thesupersoldiers.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thesupersoldiers.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11891190" rel="nofollow">Radi0logy</a>: @<a href="#c11894252" rel="nofollow">Gilbert</a>:</p>
<p>Indeed. AT&amp;T on this one. This 50/50 tie is really funny though.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T04:09:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11894998</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11894998" />
    <title>Comment from Craig Hermann on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Craig Hermann</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have nothing against Circuit City.  I always felt that their employees knew what they were talking about (moreso than Best Buy's, at least) and I thought they had competitive prices and some great sales.  I think what did them in is that their stores were generally not as large or as welcoming as Best Buy's.  I felt like I could just mill around and play with things at Best Buy, but when I went to Circuit City, it was usually for a reason.</p>
<p>That said, put them up against a carrier with spotty coverage and a crappy track record of bad billing, and you can guess who got my vote.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T04:06:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11894690</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11894690" />
    <title>Comment from Yoko Broke Up The Beatles on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Yoko Broke Up The Beatles</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Normally, I'd be quick to vote for CC here, but as others correctly pointed out, CC is already dead. CC winning the worst company in america title wouldn't get the company to change its practices!</p><br />
<p>Not that AT&amp;T winning would, but at least an active company winning the title *MIGHT* shed some light on a horrible, horrible company, and hopefully get some changes made.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T03:52:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11894557</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11894557" />
    <title>Comment from Gilbert Tang, Jr. on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Gilbert Tang, Jr.</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/gtangjr</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/gtangjr">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11894128" rel="nofollow">SacraBos</a>: I disagree. By going bankrupt, CC showed its ultimate dedication to failing itself, not the consumer.</p>
<p>I personally disliked CC, but that was because of their uninviting atmosphere and dingbat employees. That didn't mean I wouldn't get a product there if it were the best price. Regardless, the company was relatively harmless.</p>
<p>AT&amp;T, on the other hand, routinely shafts its millions of subscribers by failing to provide appropriate (let alone above-and-beyond) customer service, wasting resources, not meeting demand as advertised, stripping customers of privileges only to charge for them later, and stomping on consumer rights via their frequently shady TOS updates.</p>
<p>Add to this a US exclusive on a groundbreaking device and you have a lot of comments to the effect of, "boy, I love my iPhone, but I hate that I have to use AT&amp;T" and so on.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T03:46:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11894383</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11894383" />
    <title>Comment from Gilbert Tang, Jr. on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Gilbert Tang, Jr.</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/gtangjr</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/gtangjr">
        <![CDATA[<p>It would be a real coup if AT&amp;T, a company that would under most circumstances be a clear "winner" in any bracket, could walk away from this unscathed via a company that no longer has any stake in consumers' lives, yet has garnered enough loud publicity to warrant a vote.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T03:39:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11894310</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11894310" />
    <title>Comment from BacteriaEP on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>BacteriaEP</name>
        <uri>http://www.rpghead.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rpghead.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I prefer to vote for a company that still exists. Besides the last time I checked AT&amp;T has done some pretty f-ed up stuff in the past.</p>
<p>The worst I've heard from Circuit City is their crappy customer service.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T03:37:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11894252</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11894252" />
    <title>Comment from Gilbert Tang, Jr. on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Gilbert Tang, Jr.</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/gtangjr</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/gtangjr">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11891190" rel="nofollow">Radi0logy</a>: My sentiments exactly, whereas AT&amp;T routinely shoves it to people, including myself.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T03:35:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11894128</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11894128" />
    <title>Comment from SacraBos on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>SacraBos</name>
        <uri>http://www.sacrabos.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sacrabos.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>CC FTL!  I'll vote for AT&amp;T next year.  By going Bankrupt, CC showed it's ultimate dedication to failing the consumer.  You don't see that kind of</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T03:31:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11893520</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11893520" />
    <title>Comment from Maurs on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Maurs</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11891465" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: True.  I mean, yeah, Circuit City cries out for a nostalgia vote, but in reality the worst crime they ever committed was screwing little old ladies with extended warranties and whatnot.  AT&amp;T on the other hand, besides being an annoying monopoly back from the monopo-grave, was and is complicit in violating the civil liberties of pretty much everybody - in the world, given how much phone and data passes through their hands at some point.  Also, sometimes my cell phone service with them is spotty!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T03:08:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11893284</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11893284" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Come on people, AT&T is one of the tele-com companies that helped the Bush administration illegally spy on Americans.  Then, after they gained immunity for these illegal actions, they gave millions to both the Democrats and the Republicans and sponsored parties at both of their conventions!  There is no way CC can top that!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T03:00:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11893127</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11893127" />
    <title>Comment from GC on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>GC</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>Death Star versus Fail Star. Went with the latter.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T02:54:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11893003</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11893003" />
    <title>Comment from codepage9 on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>codepage9</name>
        <uri>http://thinksyousuck.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://thinksyousuck.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11891533" rel="nofollow">humphrmi</a>: <br />
Aw cmon guys, the government said it was okay! /sarcasm</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T02:50:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11892897</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11892897" />
    <title>Comment from Blue387 on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Blue387</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I vote for Circuit City because it'll be the last time we can ever vote for it.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T02:46:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11892749</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11892749" />
    <title>Comment from logicalnoise on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>logicalnoise</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>AT&amp;T wins CC is dead. AT&amp;T helps continue the monopolistic consumer hating nature of ISPs and communication.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T02:41:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11892117</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11892117" />
    <title>Comment from VikingP77 on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>VikingP77</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>AT&amp;T FTW, they have dismal customer service. Stopped going to CC years ago so they didn't exist to be even before they went bust.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T02:20:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11892067</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11892067" />
    <title>Comment from sprocket79 on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>sprocket79</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11891257" rel="nofollow">MormonChristmas_GitEmSteveDave</a>: You too? I'm also out a $50 rebate. They are bastards. I hope all of their management gets nasty skin diseases or something else equally horrible.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T02:19:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11892040</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11892040" />
    <title>Comment from sprocket79 on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>sprocket79</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Circuit City got me at the very end of it's life. I (stupidly) bought something with a rebate from them on Black Friday and they declared bankruptcy before they cut my rebate check (which, ironically, was approved).</p>
<p>Burn in Hell, Circuit City. Burn in Hell.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T02:18:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11891981</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11891981" />
    <title>Comment from jeffbone on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>jeffbone</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The intent of the WCiA Award, or so I thought, was to provide a little public embarrassment that might prod bad companies into improving customer service or changing other bad behaviors.  Therefore, even though I realize they are otherwise eligible, it seems pointless to even have Circuit City in the brackets.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T02:16:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11891950</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11891950" />
    <title>Comment from TerribleDecade on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>TerribleDecade</name>
        <uri>http://cheapassgamer.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://cheapassgamer.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Circuit City I guess? But that vote doesn't count, so it has to go to ATT.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T02:15:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11891937</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11891937" />
    <title>Comment from JGKojak on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>JGKojak</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>AT&amp;T you are sometimes forced to use-</p><br />
<p>Circuit City I avoided like the plague- because I knew they sucked.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T02:15:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11891662</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11891662" />
    <title>Comment from Dan Cull on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dan Cull</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I bought a disc of Halo 3 at liquidation. Totally unreadable. No returns.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T02:06:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11891533</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11891533" />
    <title>Comment from humphrmi on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>humphrmi</name>
        <uri>http://famille.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://famille.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11891465" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: Agreed, and that's why they got my vote.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T02:03:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11891505</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11891505" />
    <title>Comment from diasdiem on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>diasdiem</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have more experience with Circuit City than AT&amp;T, so I'm going to have to go with them.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T02:02:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11891465</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11891465" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T, because spying illegally on millions of innocent Americans - for profit! - should never get a free pass.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T02:01:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11891384</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11891384" />
    <title>Comment from noone1569 on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>noone1569</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>And with my vote, ATT pulls ahead!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T01:58:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11891298</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11891298" />
    <title>Comment from Silversmok3 on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Silversmok3</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>This is like choosing between Stalin and Hitler-they both are jacked up.</p><br />
<p>But since Circuit City wont be eligeable next year,I vote them in.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T01:56:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11891269</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11891269" />
    <title>Comment from cabjf on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>cabjf</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11891190" rel="nofollow">Radi0logy</a>: Not to mention Circuit City can't hurt anyone anymore.  Better to go after the live threat that the defeated one.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T01:54:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11891257</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11891257" />
    <title>Comment from MormonChristmas_GitEmSteveDave on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>MormonChristmas_GitEmSteveDave</name>
        <uri>http://www.CanItKillTheGrimace.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.CanItKillTheGrimace.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>So who gets the award if CC wins?  Do you send it to the liquidator?  Can I get a share since they stiuffed me out of a $50 rebate when they sell it?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T01:54:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11891224</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11891224" />
    <title>Comment from j-o-h-n on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>j-o-h-n</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>50:50!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T01:53:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11891199</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11891199" />
    <title>Comment from NeverLetMeDown on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>NeverLetMeDown</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Isn't this a bit like saying "who should win the baseball MVP this year, A-Rod or Babe Ruth?"</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T01:52:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855-comment:11891190</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5200855" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/worst-company-in-america-att-vs-circuit-city.html#c11891190" />
    <title>Comment from Radi0logy on 2009-04-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Radi0logy</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Oh boy.. this is a tough one..<br />
Gonna have to go with At&amp;t, since CC never really hurt anybody, they were just really REALLY bad at running a business.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-07T01:52:12Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



