<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T12:43:39Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Chrysler Will Enter Bankruptcy, Partner With Fiat, Warranties Backed By US Government</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5234410" title="Chrysler Will Enter Bankruptcy, Partner With Fiat, Warranties Backed By US Government" />
    <published>2009-04-30T21:35:11Z</published>
    <updated>2009-04-30T21:31:26Z</updated>
    <title>Chrysler Will Enter Bankruptcy, Partner With Fiat, Warranties Backed By US Government</title>
    <summary>--&gt;President Obama announced today that Chrysler would seek bankruptcy protection and enter into an alliance with Fiat. The president told reporters that a &quot;small group of speculators&quot; made up of hedge funds and other investors held out in the hopes that the US government would bail them out. That didn&apos;t happen. </summary>
    <author>
      <name>Meg Marco</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Chrysler" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/31/2009/04/4-30-2009_12-29-12_PM.jpg" width="204" height="167" />-->President Obama announced today that Chrysler would seek bankruptcy protection and enter into an alliance with Fiat. The president told reporters that a "small group of speculators" made up of hedge funds and other investors held out in the hopes that the US government would bail them out. That didn't happen. </p>
<p>The NYT has the numbers:</p>
<blockquote><p>A senior White House official said that the case would begin immediately, and that the government would provide debtor-in-possession financing in a range of $3 billion to $3.5 billion, so the company can continue to operate normally.</p>
<p>Once Chrysler restructures, the company would receive $4.5 billion in financing to restart its operations, for total American government support through the bankruptcy process and afterwards of up to $8 billion.</p>
<p>That is $2 billion more than President Obama initially said the company would receive if it successfully reached a deal with Fiat.</p>
<p>Chrysler has already received $4.5 billion from the government, under a bailout plan put into effect by the Bush administration in late December, after Congress rejected legislation that would have provided federal aid.</p>
<p>The Canadian government also is expected to provide $1 for every $3 in American support, the official said, meaning Chrysler could receive another $2.6 billion.</p></blockquote>
<p> Obama encouraged American consumers to continue to support Chrysler, emphasizing that it would be business as usual during the bankruptcy proceedings &mdash; which are expected to be as short as 30 days.</p>
<p>For those consumers concerned about buying a car from a bankrupt automaker, the president promised that Chrysler warranties would be fully backed by US government.</p>
<p>The WSJ says the holdouts, calling themselves "Non-TARP Lenders," claim that their attempts to restructure the company's debt were "flatly rejected or ignored." </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/01/business/01auto.html?hp">Chrysler Bankruptcy Plan Is Announced </a> [NYT]<br />
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090430-715340.html">Lenders: Offer To Restructure Chrysler Debt Has Been Ignored </a> [WSJ]<br />
(Photo:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/rckrawczykjr/3173024617/">Ralph Krawczyk Jr</a>)</p>
]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12508022</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12508022" />
    <title>Comment from econobiker on 2009-05-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>econobiker</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Unions need to mass market their message more just like businesses have marketed the "unions are stupid" message since business seeks to pay the least amount of money for the most amount of work right down to slave wage level...</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T19:53:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12507813</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12507813" />
    <title>Comment from vermontwriter on 2009-05-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>vermontwriter</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@ZManGT: I bought a Dodge in 2004 and got the extended warranty. Up until this month, nothing has gone wrong with the car, so I've never touched the warranty and the tie-rod wasn't covered anyway.</p>
<p>I called Dodge about this and was told that my extended warranty is no good and the powertrain warranty is also no longer any good. I can bring the paperwork back to the dealer for a refund of what's left (2 years) but they'll deduct a $75 cancellation fee to start.</p>
<p>I know others have told me to sell the car, but right now, I can't afford to. My husband's car is 11 years old and the plan was to buy him a new car now and mine becomes the "junker" of the family, though with 50k on it and it's still in great condition (knocking on wood) I can't really call it a junker.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T19:45:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12506825</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12506825" />
    <title>Comment from grapedog on 2009-05-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>grapedog</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>thank god for the unions, because we know that companies cannot survive and workers cannot prosper without unions...</p><br />
<p>unions save the lazy and the stupid...the smart will excel on their own.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T19:08:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12506064</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12506064" />
    <title>Comment from dave491 on 2009-05-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>dave491</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I'm a Honda of America worker and what disturbs me most about this is the fact that my company -- a company that's been in this country for 30 years -- is now put in a position of competing not only against the Detroit Three, but also the United States government now that the US is essentially a stakeholder in GM and Chrysler. I worry that this is going to affect future legislation in regard to penalizing any non-Detroit Three auto company, whether it be Honda, Toyota, BMW, VW, or any of the foreign companies that have operations here in the US. The US government already skews much automotive legislation in favor of the GM, Chrysler, and Ford (CAFE is a good example of that), now I fear that there will be a stronger push to do so -- after all, what would be their motivation? The government's going to want to make it as easy as possible to get their money back and helping their "competitors" isn't going to help meet that end.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T18:29:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12505663</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12505663" />
    <title>Comment from JacquelineToad on 2009-05-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>JacquelineToad</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Canada is providing about 3.8 billion, but was promised it would be paid back in interest. here is where I found the story in my local paper. Its an effort by both the government of the province of Ontario and the federal government in Ottawa.

<p><a href="http://www.metronews.ca/toronto/canada/article/221520--chrysler-c-3-8b-investment-not-ideal-but-best-way-to-keep-jobs-harper-says" rel="nofollow">http://www.metronews.ca/toronto/canada/article/221520--chrysler-c-3-8b-investment-not-ideal-but-best-way-to-keep-jobs-harper-says</a></p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T17:58:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12504836</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12504836" />
    <title>Comment from ZManGT on 2009-05-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>ZManGT</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Question on the warranties. I bought a Jeep in November of 2008, this was before any "restructuring". Does this mean my warranty is no longer good? Does this also mean that the lifetime powertrain warranty will no longer be good?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T15:35:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12504245</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12504245" />
    <title>Comment from cromartie on 2009-05-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>cromartie</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12487843" rel="nofollow">vladthepaler</a>: Do you employ 40k people as one of the lynch pins of a national economy?</p>
<p>No?</p>
<p>Then shut up.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T13:09:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12503568</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12503568" />
    <title>Comment from AgentTuttle on 2009-05-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>AgentTuttle</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Jesus Chrystler! I knew they would fail anyway.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T11:50:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12502607</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12502607" />
    <title>Comment from the lesser of two weevils on 2009-05-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>the lesser of two weevils</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12489301" rel="nofollow">ARP</a>: This is true. In the last few days of pre-bankruptcy, the UAW agreed to significant cuts and modifications to its 2007 contract w/ Chrysler. Granted they also got a 55% stake in the company by doing this, but hey it just means more is on the line for them as well, seems fair enough. While they could've made these arrangements earlier, at least they did finally admit to reality and make concessions. It's too bad the greedy hedge funders that control Chrysler were too interested in their own pocketbooks than making realistic concessions as well.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T10:22:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12500571</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12500571" />
    <title>Comment from SonicPhoenix on 2009-05-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>SonicPhoenix</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12483303" rel="nofollow">Corporate_guy</a>: I doubt it.  Secured creditors (i.e. bond holders) are generally at the top of the list when it comes to recouping assets in a bankruptcy.  I'm guessing that they'll do much better than what they were offered since the courts will probably recognize that as secured creditors, they are legally entitled to priority in the new division of assets.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T08:03:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12499232</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12499232" />
    <title>Comment from terrytaillard on 2009-05-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>terrytaillard</name>
        <uri>http://www.consumerconnection.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.consumerconnection.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Fiat?</p>
<p>Yes I know this is not new news but really?  Does anyone think Fiat is the white knight that will shoe Chrysler the path to making good and profitable cars?  My wife has had two Fiat Spyders and while they were fun at the time, they were clearly not high quality cars.  Not to worry, they have gotten worse since then.</p>
<p>Maybe when this relationship fails the Edsel Company can bail them both out.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T06:48:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12497997</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12497997" />
    <title>Comment from RogueWarrior on 2009-05-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>RogueWarrior</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is how communism starts.  The government and the unions (same thing) now own two major auto makers.  They'll attempt to create some piece of crap green car that would get slaughtered if it ran on a bumper car track and nobody will want them.  No problem.  They'll slap enormous tariffs on all cool imported cars or perhaps even ban them altogether since they'll be considered hazardous to the environment.  Voila!  Socialized industry.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T05:35:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12497401</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12497401" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-05-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12490435" rel="nofollow">Red_Flag</a>: I have a natural distrust of any large organization.<br />
But labor not organizing when management seems quite foolish.<br />
And it's quite amusing when working-class people fed on a constant Fox News diet are so vociferous in their hatred towards unions, when it's so clearly against their economic interest. (shrug)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T05:04:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12497104</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12497104" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12489602" rel="nofollow">ARP</a>: I'm struggling to recall if suburban Illinois is justly renowned for being anything but a Chicago writ smaller. And I'm failing.</p>
<p>Great parades with beefy guys wearing colorful armbands? What else?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T04:48:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12496436</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12496436" />
    <title>Comment from gaywolverine on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>gaywolverine</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>There are some major lies being told about the union pay at these plants. On ething that the car companies keep adding in is the pensions, and health care of retirees. Isnt it logical that a company around for as many years as GHM or Chrysler will have older, and more retired workers. Guess what, when the Toyota people retire Toyota has the same issue. By the way, TOYOTA is losing MAJOR money in this recession. As is Nissan, and every other car company. The foreign companies have help in RD from their governments as well.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T04:14:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12494507</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12494507" />
    <title>Comment from WiglyWorm must cease and decist on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>WiglyWorm must cease and decist</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5234410/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government#c12489602" rel="nofollow">ARP</a>: Unfortunately, the "Nazi" party was properly named the "National Socialist" party in Germany. I doubt that is what the OP meant to portray when he said it, but it <i>was</i> poor wording.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T03:03:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12493698</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12493698" />
    <title>Comment from thaShady on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>thaShady</name>
        <uri>http://www.twitter.com/thaShady</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.twitter.com/thaShady">
        <![CDATA[<p>what happens to the retirees pension?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T02:35:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12492647</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12492647" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12489775" rel="nofollow">Inglix_the_Mad</a>: You my friend need to heed your own advice; "STFU and go learn something".  It is the Democrats who"have cultivated this culture of ignorance".  Dating back to the Clinton years, Democrats have freely stated that "they know better than the average american how our tax money should be spent"...therefore, (I'm paraphrasing) Democrats are against any kind of tax cut that would put more money into the taxpayers hand.  I don't understand why you, supposedly a "grown-up" have fialed to miss all this.  Speaking of "gut reactions" - how else would you catagorize the bailouts?!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T02:02:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12491878</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12491878" />
    <title>Comment from dangermike on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>dangermike</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12489602" rel="nofollow">ARP</a>:  "Which modern party does that sound like?"</p>
<p>Both, actually.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T01:41:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12490435</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12490435" />
    <title>Comment from Red_Flag on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Red_Flag</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12488452" rel="nofollow">Trai_Dep</a>: While anecdote != data, I'd mention that my father was once a Teamster, and often told me how the union always accepted and spent his dues money, but never stood up for him when needed.</p>
<p>I can't speak with any authority whatsoever on the UAW, but I would think that, without strong internal vigilance, it is possible for them to have metastasized into an organization seeking the organization's good over the members' good. Whether or not that's the case, I don't have the research to say.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T01:02:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12489775</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12489775" />
    <title>Comment from Inglix_the_Mad on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Inglix_the_Mad</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12486943" rel="nofollow">kwsventures</a>: OMG another moron that doesn't know what Socialism is! Yippee!</p>
<p>Listen to Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage, O'Reilly, or Beck?</p>
<p>I love you guys, you're as entertaining as Marxists. OMG OMG OMG ZEE SOCIALISTS! OMG OMG OMG ZEE FASCISTS!</p>
<p>You guys don't even know what you're talking about. Now when you get all growed up and actually read up on what you're speaking, us older folk that actually fought the real Commies will take you seriously. Until then, you're just making conservatives look bad. STFU and go learn something.</p>
<p>I don't know why Republicans have cultivated this culture of ignorance. This is only detrimental, in the long run, as decisions based on gut reactions are often wholly incorrect.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:45:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12489602</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12489602" />
    <title>Comment from ARP on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>ARP</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5234410/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government#c12488596" rel="nofollow">Shane Elliott</a>: You've been watching too much Beck. Nazi's are not the same as socialists. They're nearly the opposite. One of the first groups Hitler jailed were Socialists and Communists. Facists historically were ultra-nationalists (e.g. you're either with us or against us, you must support the president or you want the terrorsists to win and hate the troops), and unltra-corporatists. Meaning, they would develop close relationships with large corporations and let them do what they wanted. Which modern party does that sound like?</p><br />
<p>PS- "I hate Illinois Nazi's" is from the Blues Brothers. Classic line.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:41:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12489560</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12489560" />
    <title>Comment from Inglix_the_Mad on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Inglix_the_Mad</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12484730" rel="nofollow">WiglyWorm</a>: They keep using that word. I do not think it means what they think it means. Truth be told though, any static economic philosophy (Capitalism, Socialism, or Communism) is doomed to failure.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:40:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12489536</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12489536" />
    <title>Comment from squinko on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>squinko</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12488596" rel="nofollow">Shane Elliott</a>: I didn't know there would be anyone outside of Michigan who would understand what it's like to have a Detroit in their state.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:39:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12489481</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12489481" />
    <title>Comment from Inglix_the_Mad on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Inglix_the_Mad</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12483826" rel="nofollow">Radi0logy</a>: Yeah, that'll happen. Capitalism has nothing to do with inspirational business models. Capitalism is all about short-term profits today, and that's the same thing that got the Big 3 into trouble. Don't believe me, go look through their books for the last 50 years, especially the last 30.</p>
<p>People act like Detroit started making crappy cars back in the late 70's forward. I'm sorry to burst your f*ckin' bubble, but the big 3 were making sh*tty cars in the 50's.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:38:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12489407</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12489407" />
    <title>Comment from ARP on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>ARP</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5234410/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government#c12486742" rel="nofollow">Shane Elliott</a>: It would be an interesting study. Would they push hard for really high wages for their workers, would they kill models that aren't making money, etc. if it was THEIR money at stake?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:36:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12489353</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12489353" />
    <title>Comment from Inglix_the_Mad on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Inglix_the_Mad</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12486185" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: You too can be an executive. Skills include bullsh*tting people, wasting time, and getting your meals catered.</p>
<p>Honestly, too many people have bought into the Corporatist "CEO's create wealth" bullsh*t. Yeah, maybe 1% do. Google, MS, et al.</p>
<p>VERY few CEO's really create anything. I've dealt with these nozzles day in and out on a contract basis, and most of them are good at looking good and saying a LOT of nothing.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:34:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12489301</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12489301" />
    <title>Comment from ARP on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>ARP</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5234410/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government#c12483734" rel="nofollow">dave_coder</a>: Uh, they made huge concessions to help avoid this.</p><br />
<p>Please send me the articles about how senior leadership made big concessions in their salary.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:33:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12489075</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12489075" />
    <title>Comment from Red_Flag on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Red_Flag</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12484730" rel="nofollow">WiglyWorm</a>: Free market means free to fail in addition to free to succeed.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:27:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12489034</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12489034" />
    <title>Comment from Inglix_the_Mad on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Inglix_the_Mad</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12485736" rel="nofollow">shepd</a>: You want irony, watch the union take a pay cut and then watch the executives take bonus that same quarter / fiscal year.</p>
<p>Honestly: Why the f*ck should the unions ever back down if they have even an inkling that a majority of the paycut will end up in the pocket of the executives?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:25:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12488852</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12488852" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12486943" rel="nofollow">kwsventures</a>: Why do you hate the US military with such a seething passion? Yup: socialism.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:20:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12488821</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12488821" />
    <title>Comment from Inglix_the_Mad on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Inglix_the_Mad</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12485341" rel="nofollow">ilovemom</a>: Ahh, so it's too much for an executive as well, right? I mean, good for the good, good for the gander.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:19:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12488596</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12488596" />
    <title>Comment from Shane Elliott on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shane Elliott</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12487038" rel="nofollow">squinko</a>: only according to the map.  Culturally speaking, most of the people south of Cook County do really look at Chicago as being its own separate little corrupt fiefdom that somehow screws with our state government.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:12:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12488576</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12488576" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12483303" rel="nofollow">Corporate_guy</a>: Yup.<br />
High risk bet that unsuprisingly blew up in their faces. You'd <i>think </i>with that much supposed intelligence, they'd have learned from the last year. I guess that they won't until they've gambled away every last dime in their portfolio.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:12:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12488512</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12488512" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have to say, Yay Canada for pitching in.<br />
Although Mexico, next time? Cash vastly preferred over pandemic viruses. "A" for effort, though!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:10:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12488452</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12488452" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>To those whose union-haters whose livelihood is not based on skimming from the proceeds of your investments and trust funds, allow me to give a metaphor that captures the brilliance of your position.</p>
<p>Mouse: "Cats <b>must </b>be allowed to range where they like and we <b>demand </b>that collars with bells be outlawed. It's against the natural order of things. How <i>else </i>will the craven song bird population learn important survival skills that benefit them in the long run?"</p>
<p>Tweety: "But that's <i>insane</i>. Cats already have stealth, claws, fangs and lighting fast reflexes. They've banded together in hunting packs. We must organize too. And, besides, birds aren't the <b>only </b>thing cats eat, grain-breath.</p>
<p>Mouse: "Nonsense. Overruled. Cats r-u-l-e, birds da f-o-o-l!"</p>
<p>Cat: "Heh. Heh. Heh. Now I'm hungry."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:07:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12488440</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12488440" />
    <title>Comment from Anthony Warburton on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anthony Warburton</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thank you for buying a new car.....</p>
<p>When you take your car in for that "recall" the dealership will say what recall? theres no recall. Get off our property, oil changes will be handled via FOOD STAMPS. And any service work you need will be in the form of a vehicle exchange congrats you now get a tank.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-01T00:07:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12488128</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12488128" />
    <title>Comment from Saboth on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Saboth</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wow, I thought the government was spending a lot before. But now...they are backing Chrysler warranties? Is there that much money in the world?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T23:59:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12487843</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12487843" />
    <title>Comment from vladthepaler on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>vladthepaler</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Can I declare bankrupcy too? I want a free 8 billion dollars.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T23:51:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12487673</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12487673" />
    <title>Comment from nataku8_e30 on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>nataku8_e30</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Chrysler, put the Hornet or Demon into production, and I'll go buy one.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T23:47:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12487038</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12487038" />
    <title>Comment from squinko on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>squinko</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12486777" rel="nofollow">Shane Elliott</a>: Chicago is in Illinois, right?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T23:28:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12486999</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12486999" />
    <title>Comment from rhys1882 on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>rhys1882</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's up to the bankruptcy judge to determine if the UAW contracts should be restructured or voided.  The determining factor will be Chrysler's ability to maintain itself under those agreements.  The bankruptcy judge will seek a mutual decision between UAW and Chrysler, but will ultimately have the final say on whether the contracts remain enforceable, are voided entirely, or are restructured to allow for Chrysler's viability.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T23:27:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12486943</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12486943" />
    <title>Comment from kwsventures on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>kwsventures</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>What is wrong with socialism? Do I have to answer that question? Hey, you want to give more and more of your liberty and freedom to a small group that will make all your decisions, you should move to Cuba. How exactly great is life in that country during the past 50 years? What is  wrong with socialism? OMG.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T23:25:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12486839</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12486839" />
    <title>Comment from kwsventures on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>kwsventures</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Obama announces Chrysler's BK. Interesting. I guess he is the one calling the shots at the private company. When the majority voted Obama as president of the USA, did they know he would use taxpayer funded welfare money to take control of private business in the USA. Therefore, become the voice of that company? If it smells like economic central planning, it probably is.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T23:21:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12486777</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12486777" />
    <title>Comment from Shane Elliott on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shane Elliott</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12484690" rel="nofollow">WiglyWorm</a>: The Obama is not an Illinois anything, he is a Chicago politician.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T23:19:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12486742</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12486742" />
    <title>Comment from Shane Elliott on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shane Elliott</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12486230" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: this is a critical question, because from what I had heard, the 55% stake was in exchange for cutting Chrysler's obligations to the UAW by 50%.  However, I am concerned as to whether or not such a 55% stake could give the UAW the power to influence or outright control the bargaining as it relates to UAW contracts.  In essence, can they abuse that stake in the company to make the company pay up as if they never had cut their obligation in half?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T23:18:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12486640</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12486640" />
    <title>Comment from mac-phisto on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>mac-phisto</name>
        <uri>http://n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12483303" rel="nofollow">Corporate_guy</a>: yes, i'm going to second that. i don't even care if 100% of my 401(k) is invested in one of those hedge funds. the executive branch REPEATEDLY said there would be no more money unless certain concessions were made. wipe 'em out.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T23:15:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12486413</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12486413" />
    <title>Comment from Beki on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Beki</name>
        <uri>http://beki.tumblr.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://beki.tumblr.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12486185" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>:<br />
Not claiming to be an expert, never been to a car factory. But I will note that just because they always show a couple robot arms in the commercials doesn't mean robots build the cars. (Not that you said it, I've seen a  few comments on Consumerist to that effect.) Real people do need to assemble the vehicles. There is at least some amount of mechanical/technical knowledge and physical labor.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T23:08:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12486230</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12486230" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12485783" rel="nofollow">Tmoney02</a>: But I think it does make a difference because if they own 55% that means they own the company, and can have power over it, right? Or does a union technically not have any power because they're not a company, or are subjected to a board with veto power?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T23:02:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12486185</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12486185" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12485854" rel="nofollow">shepd</a>: What I'm wondering is, what do the auto workers do? Is their job extremely technical in nature? I can imagine structural engineers get high pay because there's a great deal of education involved, but I never considered auto worker jobs to be low-education jobs by any means. But if the environment they're working in is dangerous in any way, or if it requires a good amount of mechanical and technical expertise, I could see how they would get paid a lot more than joe schmoe.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T23:01:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12486124</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12486124" />
    <title>Comment from Beki on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Beki</name>
        <uri>http://beki.tumblr.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://beki.tumblr.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12484344" rel="nofollow">dave_coder</a>: <br />
I look at it more like most people get paid waaay too little for what they do.</p>
<p>We should all be able to find a good job with decent pay, benefits, and pension. Just because it's unheard of these days for most people doesn't mean auto workers are evil for having it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:59:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12485891</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12485891" />
    <title>Comment from mzs on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>mzs</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12484726" rel="nofollow">vermontwriter</a>: I really feel bad for you. I bought a Dodge a while back with the extended warranty and that ran out just a few months ago. In fact I sold the Dodge 4 days before the extended warranty ran out. But I assume that you already saved what you paid for the extended warranty, I did in the first year. So look at the bright side.</p>
<p>I think the best thing you should do is sell your car. If it was anything like my Grand Caravan, it is simply a ticking time bomb until the next +$800 repair. Also I don't know what car you have but say you paid $20K for it new, your looking at $4-6K at CarMax now. That is a good down payment on a Honda say.</p>
<p>Finally when I got the extended warranty after a lot of haggling the dealership would no longer agree to lower price, so I got them to throw in oil changes, tire rotaions, and a cleaning/detailing certificate. The dealership was out of business in  less than a month. The new dealership would not honor the old ones papers. That ruffled my feathers at the time, but again I came so much ahead on the repairs of that turd of a car that I like to look at the bright side and not care anymore.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:53:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12485854</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12485854" />
    <title>Comment from shepd on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>shepd</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12485024" rel="nofollow">wgrune</a>:</p>
<p>One more note on pay, I worked as a junior year 1 electrician's apprentice (actually, for the first three months I was just an electrician's assistant due to apprenticing laws here) and I was paid $16+ an hour two years ago by a non-union auto parts manufacturer.  That was actually the highest anyone I know of that started out as an electrician got paid in their first year, including in union places.</p>
<p>I find it incredibly hard to believe the average wage is $20 an hour at ANY auto plant (union or not) considering this place was considered "cheap" by fellow workers when it comes to pay.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:52:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12485783</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12485783" />
    <title>Comment from Tmoney02 on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tmoney02</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12484817" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: doesn't matter if its 30 or 55, companies with union ownership that high have little history of success.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:51:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12485736</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12485736" />
    <title>Comment from shepd on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>shepd</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12484767" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>:</p>
<p>Hmmm, well, I live in an auto town.  The average CAW worker makes $35 an hour (from the CAW themselves).  The average worker at the local non-unionized Toyota plant makes $33.45 an hour (<a href="http://www.lfpress.ca/cgi-bin/publish.cgi?p=228101&amp;s=wheels" rel="nofollow">published</a>), which, considering Cambridge is one of the cheapest urban areas here to live, is pretty damn good and not unfair at all.</p>
<p>The CAW is upset because they aren't getting dues.  They actually picket the WORKERS at the Toyota factory to get them to join the union.  The workers say, firmly, "no".  They like working for an employer that respects them, that they don't have to fight with, and, most importantly, willingly gives them the same benefits and pay that the CAW workers have.</p>
<p>Let me give you some history to prove that unions (not just the CAW) in general just don't know when to give up:</p>
<p>IAW - <a href="http://www2.canada.com/windsorstar/news/story.html?id=553beec6-8c21-469f-b08f-543fdb2138aa" rel="nofollow">March 2008</a><br />
CAW women - <a href="http://www.caw.ca/en/3819.htm" rel="nofollow">February 2005</a></p>
<p>It goes back before then, because I know there was another push back sometime between 2001-2003, but of course, not a lot of newspaper articles online from that time.</p>
<p>Always rejected, always told to go away, but they won't give up.  You would think after the second time they would have figured it out.  Now the company hires lawyers to fight union votes, not because it wants to stop a union going in there, but because the unions piss off the *workers* so much.</p>
<p>The conditions aren't bad either, I've known people who worked there, and while it's monotonous as hell (what assembly line work ISN'T?) I have never heard a peep regarding working conditions.  Now, my dad worked for a unionized auto plant (and a unionized tire factory before that), and not only is it not in business anymore, but the conditions were ridiculously bad.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:49:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12485384</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12485384" />
    <title>Comment from The Cheat on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>The Cheat</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>In other news, Fiat S.p.A. announced that they would be renaming themselves to Fiao. This move was spurred by the old joke to ensure it remains current. Fix It Again, Obama!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:40:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12485341</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12485341" />
    <title>Comment from ilovemom on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>ilovemom</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12484767" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: Where is that $150/hr number coming from.  I've always heard union workers are "overpaid" but never heard a rate like that.  That works out to a bit over 300K/year, which is waaay too much, even for skilled labor.  If that's what they've been getting paid, then they're not getting any sympathy from me.  They can all go retire.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:38:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12485299</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12485299" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12485024" rel="nofollow">wgrune</a>: Ahh, apologies for the $150 number. That was anecdotal from a friend and inaccurate...though at some point, I did see that number floating around somewhere on the news.</p>
<p>I want Slate's Explainer to explain one thing to me: What exactly do auto workers do if robots are putting together doors and such? Do they watch the robots? Maintenance? Or do robots not do anything at all, and they actually piece together cars?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:37:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12485259</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12485259" />
    <title>Comment from squinko on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>squinko</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12484690" rel="nofollow">WiglyWorm</a>: Who/what, exactly, is this "Illinois Nazi" you're referring to?</p>
<p>(I'm hoping it's not President Obama, because then you'd be a complete idiot.)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:36:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12485250</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12485250" />
    <title>Comment from Esquire99 on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Esquire99</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12483456" rel="nofollow">SanDiegoDude</a>: <br />
The Bankruptcy Judge CAN void the Union agreement if asked to by Chrysler. However, the expectation is that Chrysler won't ask for the new agreement to be voided.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:36:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12485205</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12485205" />
    <title>Comment from veg-o-matic on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>veg-o-matic</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12484767" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>: Where on earth do Toyota line workers get paid $150 an hour?</p>
<p>From: <a href="http://www.aftermarketnews.com/Item/28594/uaw_losing_pay_edge_foreign_automakers_bonuses_boost_wages_in_us_plants_as_detroit_car_companies_struggle.aspx" rel="nofollow">[www.aftermarketnews.com]</a><br />
via the Detriot Free Press, 2007 (apparently)</p>
<p></p><blockquote>Toyota Motor Corp. gave workers at its largest U.S. plant bonuses of $6,000 to $8,000, boosting the average pay at the Georgetown, KY, plant to the equivalent of $30 an hour. That compares with a $27 hourly average for UAW workers, most of whom did not receive profit-sharing checks last year. Toyota would not provide a U.S. average, but said its 7,000-worker Georgetown plant is representative of its U.S. operations. </blockquote>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:35:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12485185</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12485185" />
    <title>Comment from tinmanx on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>tinmanx</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>What's going to happen with the investment group that purchased Chrysler from Daimler?  They bought it and then refused to back/help it, and now the US government is going to fix Chrysler, will the owner profit?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:34:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12485024</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12485024" />
    <title>Comment from wgrune on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>wgrune</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5234410/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government#c12484767" rel="nofollow">pecan 3.14159265</a>:</p><br />
<p>The most recent number I have seen puts the average pay of a domestice UAW worker at $28/hour. Toyota and Nissan workers are paid less, around $20/ hour, I believe. The hourly wage numbers of $70+ per hour include the cost of pensions, health care, etc. I would really find it hard to believe a Toyota worker can pull in $300k per year, but I could be wrong.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:29:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484884</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484884" />
    <title>Comment from Corporate_guy on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Corporate_guy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12483526" rel="nofollow">ChrisC1234</a>: Your tax dollars don't pay for anything unless one of the companies goes under and only if people make warranty claims.  Plus this only effects cars bought after the plan is setup.  Cars bought before the announcement are not covered.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:25:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484847</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484847" />
    <title>Comment from You Cannot Untoast on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>You Cannot Untoast</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12483713" rel="nofollow">rpm773</a>: ZINGER ALERT!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:24:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484836</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484836" />
    <title>Comment from You Cannot Untoast on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>You Cannot Untoast</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12483540" rel="nofollow">ElizabethD</a>: Your grandfather does ecstasy, post-mortem?</p>
<p>No, I kid. His rolling is joined by a large portion of my deceased relatives as well.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:24:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484818</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484818" />
    <title>Comment from WiglyWorm must cease and decist on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>WiglyWorm must cease and decist</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12483734" rel="nofollow">dave_coder</a>: Huh?</p>
<p>We *DIDN'T* prop up this company. You people are stupid sometimes.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:23:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484817</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484817" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12484611" rel="nofollow">Tmoney02</a>: Last I checked, it was possibly a takeover stake...I'm concerned, but I don't know why.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:23:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484797</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484797" />
    <title>Comment from wgrune on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>wgrune</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5234410/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government#c12484344" rel="nofollow">dave_coder</a>:</p><br />
<p>I will agree with you that the UAW average is WAY too high for the work being done, but others on here won't so be ready...</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:23:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484794</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484794" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12484282" rel="nofollow">Lincolnsbeard33</a>: These kids today, and their logic. Sigh.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:23:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484784</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484784" />
    <title>Comment from WiglyWorm must cease and decist on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>WiglyWorm must cease and decist</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12484282" rel="nofollow">Lincolnsbeard33</a>: It's actually common practice for something this important (i.e. on the level of an auto warranty) to be backed by the government during bankruptcy.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:23:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484767</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484767" />
    <title>Comment from pecan 3.14159265 on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>pecan 3.14159265</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12484344" rel="nofollow">dave_coder</a>: How it was explained to me by a friend whose family has a long legacy of working in the big three industry (they all live in Michigan) is that when Toyota, Nissan, et. al. decided to begin producing cars in the U.S., they purposely avoided unionizing, and went to great lengths to discourage unions. Toyota pays their workers about $50 less than the unionized employees of the big three do - but Toyota workers are being paid $150 an hour! So in the bigger scheme, when you really factor how much these workers are all being paid...$50 difference doesn't seem so big.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:22:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484757</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484757" />
    <title>Comment from Corporate_guy on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Corporate_guy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12483456" rel="nofollow">SanDiegoDude</a>: I read that all contracts can be broken via bankruptcy.  That includes union deals.  A comment from some official had said that a bankruptcy judge would be crazy to break the new union agreement and everyone expects the agreement to make it through bankruptcy.</p>
<p>Oh and don't let anyone tell you the unions did not cause this.  If a company cannot cut off bonuses, fire workers, and drop life time cushy benefits and pension options while they are generating no profits, they will fail.  These union agreements directly caused this failure.  There is a reason management went with bigger engines and more expensive add-ons in these cars.  They hoped that a customer would easily pay more for stuff they did not need or for things that should have been standard.  After gas spiked, customers were no longer willing to pay extra for that v6, alloy wheels, or better stereo.  And it turns out when buying a bare bones 4 cylinder, the foreign companies had the US auto industry beat.  Make no mistake, the "bad" management decisions were a result of higher costs due to the union.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:22:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484730</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484730" />
    <title>Comment from WiglyWorm must cease and decist on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>WiglyWorm must cease and decist</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>How the hell is letting a failed company go bankrupt socialism?</p>
<p>That is the very essence of the free market.</p>
<p>question B: without Invoking the red scare and the lessons your pappy taught you in the 50s, what's wrong with socialism?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:21:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484726</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484726" />
    <title>Comment from vermontwriter on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>vermontwriter</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Here's what I've been told about the warranties. The government is only backing the warranties for those who purchased Chrysler cars during this restructuring period. Those of us who own Chrysler cars and are partially through warranty periods are left out in the cold. I have an extended warranty that is good until 2011 and now it's worthless. I'm trying to get the balance refunded, but I've been laughed at and told to go deal with the dealer I purchased the car from because they're my last hope.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:21:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484690</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484690" />
    <title>Comment from WiglyWorm must cease and decist on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>WiglyWorm must cease and decist</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Err... that was odd. That should just read</p>
<p>"I Hate Illinois Nazis"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:20:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484662</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484662" />
    <title>Comment from WiglyWorm must cease and decist on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>WiglyWorm must cease and decist</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>How the hell is letting a failed company @<a href="#c12484351" rel="nofollow">squinko</a>: I hate Illinois Nazis.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:19:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484611</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484611" />
    <title>Comment from Tmoney02 on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tmoney02</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12483831" rel="nofollow">Shane Elliott</a>: I thought it was 30?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:18:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484471</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484471" />
    <title>Comment from Eldritch on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Eldritch</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/EldritchGirl</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/EldritchGirl">
        <![CDATA[<p>Maybe if they made cars people wanted, this wouldn't happen.</p>
<p>That said, I love my little Honda. &lt;3</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:14:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484351</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484351" />
    <title>Comment from squinko on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>squinko</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12483849" rel="nofollow">The-Lone-Gunman</a>: Whoa dude, Nazis? Seriously? Please read: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law" rel="nofollow">[en.wikipedia.org]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:11:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484344</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484344" />
    <title>Comment from dave_coder on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>dave_coder</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12483969" rel="nofollow">fredbiscotti</a>: A reasonable person will agree however that auto workers get paid waaay to much for what they do.</p>
<p>Especially when (like in Canada) the government may get stuck paying pensions. Not to mention the super-bailouts getting handed out currently.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:11:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484282</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484282" />
    <title>Comment from Lincolnsbeard33 on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lincolnsbeard33</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12483526" rel="nofollow">ChrisC1234</a>: don't you bring logic into this.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:09:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484235</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484235" />
    <title>Comment from FooSchnickens - Full of SCAR on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>FooSchnickens - Full of SCAR</name>
        <uri>http://www.f00tography.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.f00tography.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12483831" rel="nofollow">Shane Elliott</a>: From everything I've been reading, yes.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:08:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12484112</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12484112" />
    <title>Comment from H1N1_GitEmSteveDave on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>H1N1_GitEmSteveDave</name>
        <uri>http://www.CanItKillTheGrimace.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.CanItKillTheGrimace.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, the NWO strikes again.  Fiat is part of the Buildabear Group, who really runs the world!</p>
<p>Now where is my anti-abduction helmet?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:05:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12483969</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12483969" />
    <title>Comment from fredbiscotti on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>fredbiscotti</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12483456" rel="nofollow">SanDiegoDude</a>: "We'll burn this ship before we save it"?</p>
<p>Seriously, do you even read the news? Or do you just filter out facts so that you can feel justified in your silly, anti-union notions?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/26/money.uaw.chrysler/" rel="nofollow">[www.cnn.com]</a></p>
<p>The car companies are in this mess because of mismanagement, not because the people that make their cars want to destroy their employer.</p>
<p>Labor agreements are not null and void in bankruptcy. Which is probably a good thing, since many of the workers would wind up making minimum wage while the executives continued raking in the big bucks.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T22:01:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12483849</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12483849" />
    <title>Comment from The-Lone-Gunman on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>The-Lone-Gunman</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>The first dominoe topples...</p><br />
<p>This had, and continues to have, disaster written all over it.</p><br />
<p>Remember to smile <i>widely</i>, Chrysler workers, as you greet your new National Socialist overlords.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T21:57:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12483831</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12483831" />
    <title>Comment from Shane Elliott on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shane Elliott</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>does anyone know whether or not the UAW is still getting the 55% stake in Chrystler?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T21:57:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12483826</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12483826" />
    <title>Comment from Radi0logy on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Radi0logy</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think I would much prefer Chrysler dies a horrible death, creditors take over and sell off their remaining assets, and let someone with a fresh, inspirational business model rise up to take their place (you know, like Capitalism SHOULD do it)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T21:57:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12483757</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12483757" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Corporate_Guy wrote:" I just hope the creditors get less than what they could have gotten before bankruptcy. They deserve it."
Why?  They lent the money to Chrysler in good faith, and Chrysler is unable to pay them back--we have a legal process for such contingencies, it's called "bankruptcy." 
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T21:55:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12483734</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12483734" />
    <title>Comment from dave_coder on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>dave_coder</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Oh great. We get taxed enough and now we see just how well used our money is....</p>
<p>And the auto unions still won't budge to lower wages to reasonable levels.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T21:54:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12483713</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12483713" />
    <title>Comment from rpm773 on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>rpm773</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>Chrysler to merge with Fiat by fiat.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T21:54:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12483540</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12483540" />
    <title>Comment from ElizabethD on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>ElizabethD</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hear that sound?</p>
<p>My grandpa rolling in his grave.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T21:50:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12483526</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12483526" />
    <title>Comment from ChrisC1234 on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>ChrisC1234</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I really like the part about the warranties for a company that makes CRAP to be backed by MY tax dollars.  If they made good vehicles to begin with, they wouldn't be having this problem.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T21:50:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12483456</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12483456" />
    <title>Comment from SanDiegoDude on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>SanDiegoDude</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Question - If Chrysler goes bankrupt, would that null-and-void their contracts with the UAW? If so, that would be a quick way around all the stupid negotiations with the "We'll burn this ship before we save it" attitudes the UAW seems to love to toss out....</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T21:48:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12483341</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12483341" />
    <title>Comment from snowburnt on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>snowburnt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>this == fail...but I wonder if it will turn out better than GM long term.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T21:45:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410-comment:12483303</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5234410" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/04/chrysler-will-enter-bankruptcy-partner-with-fiat-warranties-backed-by-us-government.html#c12483303" />
    <title>Comment from Corporate_guy on 2009-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Corporate_guy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I just hope the creditors get less than what they could have gotten before bankruptcy.  They deserve it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-30T21:44:48Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



