<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T13:13:28Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Walgreens Doesn&apos;t Want You To Print Your Own Passport Photos</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5179838" title="Walgreens Doesn't Want You To Print Your Own Passport Photos" />
    <published>2009-03-23T20:01:30Z</published>
    <updated>2009-03-23T20:06:51Z</updated>
    <title>Walgreens Doesn&apos;t Want You To Print Your Own Passport Photos</title>
    <summary>--&gt;Walgreens charges a hefty $7.99 for passport photos. Is it because they&apos;re super fancy, or technically challenging to create, or the paper is strawberry scented? The answer to all of these questions is no. It&apos;s because it&apos;s an easy way to make a quick buck. That&apos;s why they hate it when you find a cheaper online solution and try to print out your own 4x6 layout of passport photos via their stores.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Chris Walters</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Walgreens" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[
<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/31/2009/03/032309-001-passportpics494.jpg" class="left" width="494" height="300" style="display:block;" />-->Walgreens charges a hefty $7.99 for passport photos. Is it because they're super fancy, or technically challenging to create, or the paper is strawberry scented? The answer to all of these questions is no. It's because it's an easy way to make a quick buck. That's why <a href="http://www.epassportphoto.com/Blog/post/2009/03/What%27s-Walgreens-afraid-of--(tiny-ePassportPhotocom!).aspx">they hate it</a> when you find a cheaper online solution and try to print out your own 4x6 layout of passport photos via their stores.</p>
]]>
      <![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://consumerist.com/348324/make-your-own-passport-photos">Last year</a> we wrote about <a href="http://www.epassportphoto.com/">epassportphoto.com</a>, a free online service that lets you create your own 5-pic passport layout suitable for printing on a 4x6 photo, which you can then print anywhere you like and save yourself the expense and trouble of so-called "professional" passport photo fees. They started offering a service where, for $7, you can pick up the print at Walgreens&mdash;but Walgreens is not happy about this and is trying to put a stop to it. Here's an email they sent to epassportphoto.com:<br></p>
<blockquote>
<p>We do not allow customers to create their own passport pictures and print them themselves. It would be appreciated if you would no longer endorse our photofinishing services on your website.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Tom, the guy behind epassportphoto.com, told us, "We've had numerous customers reporting to us that Walgreens people tried to charge them the Walgreens fee" in addition to the fee they'd already paid epassportphoto.com to print the photo on their behalf.</p>
<p>We contacted Walgreens customer service for clarification, and were told that a passport photo is different than a regular photo and that's why it costs more, even if you do the work ahead of time and just send them a single 4x6 to print out the same way they print everything. This is pure nonsense&mdash;it's like saying photos of zoo animals are different from other photos, and therefore you must pay an $8 "zoo pic" processing fee.</p>
<p>Tom's website is still offering the in-store pickup option on their site, but he says epassportphoto is currently looking into using a different retailer for the in-store pickup option.</p>
<p>If you're really looking to save money, however, you should download the free file and print it yourself. Or, follow Tom's suggestion and open an online photo processor account somewhere that comes with free prints. Just don't be surprised if Walgreens gives you trouble if you try to print it via one of their drugstores.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.epassportphoto.com/Blog/post/2009/03/What%27s-Walgreens-afraid-of--(tiny-ePassportPhotocom!).aspx">"What's Walgreens afraid of? (tiny ePassportPhoto.com!?)"</a> [epassportphoto.com]</p>
]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:15795482</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c15795482" />
    <title>Comment from Carlee on 2009-10-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Carlee</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c12736843" rel="nofollow">Wheelwright</a>: <br />
It's not paying $7.99 for the CVS or Walgreen employee to take the photo and print that people have an issue with.  I think most people would be fine with that - the post office charges more than that (I think).</p>
<p>It's that if we want to print out a photo that we took ourselves, that looks like a passport photo - CVS or Walgreens will charge us $7.99 for doing nothing more than printing out another 4x6 photo.  No expertise on cutting the photo or composing the shot required at all by the CVS or Walgreens employee.</p>
<p>As for the $50,000 paper processor that the photos are printed out from - the cost is the same for a 4x6 photo comprised of six 2x2 photos of me (for a passport) and a 4x6 photo of me and friends.</p>
<p>The last time I renewed my passport was almost 10 years ago - we used a standard 35mm film camera, took photos against an off-white wall and took it to Costco to develop.  What's the difference between that and taking a SD card to a store which offers digital prints?  Is developing film and printing a photo that much different?  Yep, the printing is much less labor intensive!</p>
<p>I wonder what would happen if someone took some film in to be developed, and it was shots for a passport - would CVS have an issue with this too?  (I don't know how much it costs to develop film these days...)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-05T00:43:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:12736843</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c12736843" />
    <title>Comment from Wheelwright on 2009-05-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Wheelwright</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>As a Walgreens photo tech from a store with a pretty good customer service track record, I wanted to clear a few things up. First, in response to the "they're my pictures and I can print what I want" argument: actually, in between the part where we print them and you buy them, they're OUR pictures, and there are several legal and ethical considerations we make before we sell anything. We obviously screen for really bad stuff like kiddie porn, but we also can refuse to sell you prints we believe are protected by copywright (professional pictures and such), or that we just plain don't want to be associated with publicly ("explicit content," although most labs are pretty lenient about that as long as it seems to be consenting). We also can't reproduce state-issued IDs, birth certificates, car titles, notarized documents, and a whole host of other crap for lots of scary legal reasons. In the particular case of passport pictures, there are rules for those pictures that we want to be able to ensure before we sell them; for example, they can't be significantly digitally altered and they have to be taken within 6 months of printing. We have no way of ensuring that if we haven't taken the pictures ourselves. This thing is presumably going on a government-issued ID, remember.</p>
<p>As far as pricing goes, yes, your eight dollar passport pictures are printed on the same paper as your 29 cent 4x6 prints. (Let's ignore for now that we print it on our $50,000+ paper processor). It costs more because we do it fast, cut it exactly, and are trained to know how to take shots that won't get sent back to you in the mail six or seven times before they're accepted. If your experience doesn't go smoothly, you've unfortunately picked a Walgreens where they don't know what the fuck they're doing. When a chain has over 5000 stores out there, yeah, some are going to suck. A lot. Welcome to retail. I sympathize with your frustration, but please believe me when I say that there isn't a section in the photo lab training literature instructing us to treat you poorly and then overcharge you. If you had a crappy experience, report it to the store manager or district office. I'll come help you picket the store if you want.</p>
<p>For those of you still unconvinced who want to ask me to my face, "so, in your heart of hearts, you really think these two tiny pictures you sold me are worth eight bucks?", my answer would be... no, not really. Yeah, I'll be the first to admit our pricing could be better. Many people can print photo-lab quality pictures in their homes now, and Walgreens has frequently dropped the ball on ways to keep these people's business. Will it come back and bite us in the ass at some point? Quite possibly (Although, for those of you who have stated your desire to see CVS drive us into the ground, be aware that CVS is not the enemy, they're the loyal opposition; Wal-Mart is the enemy). Maybe we'll come up with a new brilliant way soon to deliver more passport pictures to more people at better prices. That's a (admittedly less likely) possibility too. But for now, yeah, they cost $7.99, and if that's insulting to you, we're sorry we won't be keeping your business.</p>
<p>But hey, for where I live at least, it beats the price you'll pay to get'em taken at the post office.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-12T00:01:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11616871</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11616871" />
    <title>Comment from Radi0logy on 2009-03-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Radi0logy</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11551126" rel="nofollow">johnva</a>: Speed OR reliability. If I need a package to go anywhere and it MUST get there in a certain time frame, I will never, EVER again consider using USPS</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-26T01:56:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11575901</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11575901" />
    <title>Comment from shepd on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>shepd</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11566027" rel="nofollow">yagisencho</a>:</p>
<p>My bad.  This is in Canada.  I ASS-U-MEd that the US would have similar/more stringent passport policies than us after all the crazy terrorist stuff...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T19:17:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11574150</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11574150" />
    <title>Comment from David in Brasil on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>David in Brasil</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11554444" rel="nofollow">krista</a>: I always thought that the way to have a passport photo taken was to stay up all night and not shave for a couple of days - that's the way that immigration officers always see me, anyway...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T17:37:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11573397</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11573397" />
    <title>Comment from bashar82 on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>bashar82</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I once had passport photos taken at Walgreens.  Photo was taken by a regular digital camera.  Once I got home and was about to mail an application, I realised that the photos were very grainy and with a shadow.  Fortunately, it was not for a passport. <br />
I have used epassportphoto.com and have been satisfied with the quality.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T15:21:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11573348</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11573348" />
    <title>Comment from Optimistic Prime on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Optimistic Prime</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11564777" rel="nofollow">ScottRose</a>: I did my own pictures for myself and my wife, and they turned out just fine.  Though printing at home may seem cheaper, the quality of the photo is never as good as old fashioned chemicals on photo paper.  Though I won't need my passport for 100 years, the Kodak paper will last that long.  I don't know how many pictures of relatives I get that fade after a month or two, and they weren't even in a sunny part of the apartment.  Sometimes it's worth it to pay a little more for quality.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T15:06:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11571863</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11571863" />
    <title>Comment from amandakerik on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>amandakerik</name>
        <uri>http://amandakerik.wordpress.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://amandakerik.wordpress.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11552384" rel="nofollow">Corporate_guy</a>: They're not just selling the printing process in this example, they're selling an unwritten guarantee. It's an extra service they can charge whatever they like, and only competition will even out the bad side.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T10:36:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11567939</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11567939" />
    <title>Comment from Sibyana Elhoss on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sibyana Elhoss</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>This story made me laugh. I had my passport photo taken at Walgreens a few years ago and the passport office rejected it, because the "photographer" zoomed in way too far and the photo did not fit their template.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T05:34:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11567897</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11567897" />
    <title>Comment from LandruBek on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>LandruBek</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11559142" rel="nofollow">RedwoodFlyer</a>: Not only do they check your receipts, they check out your photos too!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T05:31:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11566942</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11566942" />
    <title>Comment from orlo on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>orlo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Since you have to pay $75-$100 for the passport, the savings don't really add up, especially once you leave the country and realize how much the government has devalued the dollar</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T04:41:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11566373</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11566373" />
    <title>Comment from KenJason on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>KenJason</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think Walgreens is just looking out for their name.  They have an image to uphold, and if the print doesn't come out exactly right and gets rejected, whose name do they see on the back of the print?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T04:12:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11566027</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11566027" />
    <title>Comment from yagisencho on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>yagisencho</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5179838/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos#c11551770" rel="nofollow">shepd</a>:</p><br />
<p>When was that? I did my daughter's at the end of 2005 and had a visa photo done in a hurry by Sears last year (no special stamp or signature in either case).</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T03:56:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11565975</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11565975" />
    <title>Comment from yagisencho on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>yagisencho</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I took and printed my own photos (at home) for our daughter's passport. Quick, cheap, and no hassles.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T03:54:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11565088</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11565088" />
    <title>Comment from Psychicsword on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Psychicsword</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550517" rel="nofollow">Mooshie</a>: I worked in the photolab at CVS 2 years ago. Out of all the cvs' in the area we had the worst machine, the film pictures came out bad and sometimes it ruined the photos yet we still got customers. These customers would then buy other things that have high profit margins. The cvs passport camera was a standard digital camera that we took to the digital photo machine and lined it up right. We even let customers use the machine to use their own picture and only charged them the $0.20 but we could not guarantee the picture or help them line it up right.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T03:14:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11564777</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11564777" />
    <title>Comment from ScottRose on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>ScottRose</name>
        <uri>http://www.mintred.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mintred.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11551509" rel="nofollow">Shadowman615</a>:</p>
<p>Same here.  Read the rules and did the wife's passport photo in front of a white door in my house, cropped it appropriately, printed on photo paper and trimmed.  Few weeks later, voila: passport.  Cost was maybe 10c for the ink and paper.  Less time than going to the Walgreens around the corner.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T03:02:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11563910</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11563910" />
    <title>Comment from Hirayuki on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Hirayuki</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>We did something similar when we needed a passport photo for our son, who was three months old at the time and couldn't sit upright.  We laid him down on a white sheet, got as many of the wrinkles out as we could, and took a picture with the requisite head/face proportions.  Then we cropped it, resized it, and tiled it to a standard photo size in Photoshop and sent it off to Walgreens to be printed and picked up.</p>
<p>Now he's going on three years old and will be stuck with that baby picture in his passport for another two years, poor kid.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T02:37:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11561950</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11561950" />
    <title>Comment from richcreamerybutter on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>richcreamerybutter</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><b>RedwoodFlyer</b><br />
3:13 PM<br />
@richcreamerybutter:</p>
<p><i>I'm not sure if you're joking or not....so either get a life or good one!</i></p>
<p>I take it you don't travel out of the country much. If you use the passport for the full 10 years, it's nice to have a pleasing photo.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T01:39:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11561113</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11561113" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't know about the US but in Canada the photo company is require to stamp the back of one photo with their name, address and text that allows your guarantor to write your name and their signature. So unfortunately do it yourself picture are not possible here. However Walgreen's appears to be getting greedy and should be ashamed of themselves. But everyone here knows the saying "There's no reason for it, it's just company policy."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T01:13:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11560686</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11560686" />
    <title>Comment from Tsubasa on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tsubasa</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550820" rel="nofollow">redskull</a>: My fiance just paid the $8 at Walgreen's for this reason, and the pictures ALMOST got rejected. So much for peace of mind.</p>
<p>The USPS passport processor said they didn't like the shadows behind him and couldn't tell what color his eyes were for sure. Thankfully she was feeling generous that day I guess, and took them anyway.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T01:02:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11560317</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11560317" />
    <title>Comment from Urgleglurk on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Urgleglurk</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Considering the "service" we've gotten from Walgreens photo (not to mention CVS and some of their competitors), I'll just use my color laser printer at home. <br />I'm so sick of the crappy service, inability to get pictures back on time (or at all), and knowledge-poor employees...!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T00:52:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11559142</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11559142" />
    <title>Comment from RedwoodFlyer on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>RedwoodFlyer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11554103" rel="nofollow">Petra</a>: See everyone...Wal-Mart associates are nice people!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T00:21:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11559067</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11559067" />
    <title>Comment from RedwoodFlyer on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>RedwoodFlyer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11552401" rel="nofollow">Ben Sussman</a>: You can buy a basic printer for $39 for that matter...cheaper to buy a GD printer/camera than go to walgreens for a large Mormon-ish family!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T00:19:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11558851</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11558851" />
    <title>Comment from RedwoodFlyer on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>RedwoodFlyer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550899" rel="nofollow">LegoMan322</a>: And if you're not a member of AAA, enjoy the extra $60 you have in your pocket!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T00:14:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11558785</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11558785" />
    <title>Comment from RedwoodFlyer on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>RedwoodFlyer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11551834" rel="nofollow">richcreamerybutter</a>:</p>
<p>I'm not sure if you're joking or not....so either get a life or good one!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T00:13:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11558754</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11558754" />
    <title>Comment from Snakeophelia on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Snakeophelia</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Good to know. My passport is up for renewal next year and I now own a digital camera that's nice enough to take a valid photo. I'll be sure to have Rite Aid or someone like that print them out for me.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T00:12:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11558720</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11558720" />
    <title>Comment from RedwoodFlyer on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>RedwoodFlyer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11555276" rel="nofollow">Lin-Z</a>: Not sure where you work...but most stores use their 19 cent digital prints as a loss leader to get you in so that you linger for an hour.</p>
<p>Unless you're talking about film processing, which is cheaper since they burn the photo instead of using ink/dye sub.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T00:11:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11558121</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11558121" />
    <title>Comment from Ratty on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ratty</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Too bad Canadian passport photos require you to have your pictures stamped and by the photography studio.</p><br />
<p>I wouldn't have dared try them on my own anyway, the requirements for the pictures are insane. There was a lot of software involved on the part of the photographer to make sure the pictures worked, it took 3 or 4 shots. They guaranteed the photos as well.</p><br />
<p>Some things are best left in professional hands. I say this as someone avidly into photography. Which is why I wouldn't bother with Walgreens for their photos or prints, passport or not. Walgreens trying to charge you extra for taking the photos yourself is a bit insane.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T23:55:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11557358</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11557358" />
    <title>Comment from huadpe on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>huadpe</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Actually, I once had the State Dept. refuse to take my passport photos which I'd taken myself.  Apparently there is a rule against taking your own passport photo.</p>
<p>This was at the US Consulate at Montreal, and not a post office, so I was actually dealing with State Dept officials.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T23:35:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11556710</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11556710" />
    <title>Comment from floraposte on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>floraposte</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11553601" rel="nofollow">metaled</a>: My post office doesn't accept passport apps any more--it just tells you where to send stuff.</p>
<p>Oddly enough, my only problem with passport photos was when my application several years ago was rejected for not including photos--which it had indeed included.  Gotta love Chicago.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T23:20:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11556573</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11556573" />
    <title>Comment from Rachacha on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rachacha</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>When I was preparing my application for a passport renewal, I went to Ritz anticipating that they would stand me in front of a background with full lighting gear and use one of the 2 lens instant cameras. They have signs all over the place stating that they take passport photos, so I figured I would go to the "experts"</p><br />
<p>I tell the clerk that I need a passport photo, and he grabs a Kodak Point and Shoot camera from the display counter and stands me infront of an old sale sign taped backwards to the wall (so it was a plain white background). After about 30 shots, he finally got one that was only mildly blury and did not have a huge glare on my glasses. He went over to the Kodak self serve kiosk and printed out my pictures and handed them too me. They were so blury and dark that I was not able to use them.</p><br />
<p>I had my wife retake the pictures at home against a white wall. Imported them into Photoshop to crop them and do a bit of color correction, inserted the picture into a M.S. word template that I created. As I fo frequent International Travel, I printed the page out on 8.5 x 11 glossy photo paper that I had on hand and I now have 12 passport photos that I can use for my passports and Visa applications. I saved the Word document so that I can print out additional photos as I need them for foreign visas.</p><br />
<p>The Department of State has guidelines for the proper passport photo on their website: <a href="http://travel.state.gov/pdf/Photo-Quality-Requirements.pdf" rel="nofollow">[travel.state.gov]</a></p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T23:17:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11556381</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11556381" />
    <title>Comment from jbviau on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>jbviau</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>My two cents: epassportphoto.com worked fine for us when we needed a passport photo for our infant son. Can you imagine holding an infant up against a screen at Walgreen's and expecting him to hold still for a perfectly framed passport picture? We stayed home, took the pic with him lying on his back on a sheet, and then photoshopped out the background. Had it developed at Ritz Camera (submitted online). The State Dept. had no problem with it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T23:13:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11555881</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11555881" />
    <title>Comment from IphtashuFitz on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>IphtashuFitz</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>AAA offers one set of passport photos for free if you're a member.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T23:00:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11555300</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11555300" />
    <title>Comment from Gokuhouse on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Gokuhouse</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Doesn't this sound like Walgreens is fraudulently trying to force or trick people into paying for a service they never actually performed?</p>
<p>Walgreens offers two different services:<br />
1.) Passport pictures they take and size and make sure meet regulations.<br />
2.)Print your own photos that you take and size and make sure meet whatever requirements you have.</p>
<p>How can they charge you for a service they didn't perform, unless they are going back through the photo and resizing it and making sure it meets regulations and making sure the lighting is ok and whatever else they do?  Something tells me they aren't doing these things and they are trying to charge people for a service they didn't actually do.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T22:46:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11555276</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11555276" />
    <title>Comment from Lin-Z [linguist on duty] on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lin-Z [linguist on duty]</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550517" rel="nofollow">Mooshie</a>: Believe it or not, photo labs are extremely profitable. At the lab I work at, which does a full chemical process, it only costs about 4 cents to make a print. You pay 20 or so cents. Sounds pretty profitable to me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T22:45:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11555254</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11555254" />
    <title>Comment from JiminyChristmas on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>JiminyChristmas</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Just avoid Walgreen's for passport photos. I had mine done there once about two years ago. When I went to the post office to submit my passport application they told me that the State Department would probably reject the photo because it didn't meet specifications...but I was welcome to try and send it in anyway.</p><br />
<p>This was back when it was taking 12+ weeks to get a passport, so I had them re-take the photo at the post office. Good thing, because even though I submitted my passport application four months before my trip I still got it only two weeks prior to my departure. I would have been screwed it I had to re-submit the photo.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T22:44:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11555185</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11555185" />
    <title>Comment from QrazyQat on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>QrazyQat</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Last couple times we got passport type photos (for various SE Asian visas) we got them in Thailand. 30 baht for two sets of photos, taken and printed (about a buck), and before that was the "expensive" place, where we had a guy spend some time getting good shots (and they loaned my girlfriend a jacket so she'd look more official): 120 baht (4 bucks). Her best pic, and she's one of those people who always manages to sabotage her pictures.</p><br />
<p>Now sure, some of you are trying to say it's not worth flying to Thailand just to save $5, but pile on a few things. Got some dental work needed? For the price of two or three crowns in the USA you can have a month in Thailand plus the dental work (excellent work). Or if you need an operation that's not an emergency and you're paying for it, again, go to Thailand, stay a month, eat out, save money. And any sewing repairs you need, zippers replaced, pictures you need, and get your hair cut while you're at it ($3 with shampooing and scalp massage), pile that all on.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T22:42:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11554748</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11554748" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11553601" rel="nofollow">metaled</a>: 

<p>The USPS basically checks the paperwork, takes a photo (for a fee) then stuffs it all in a Priority Mail envelope (which you pay for) to send it to the Feds. </p>

<p>The only "in person" application really is if you go to the federal passport centers. There it's even possible to get a same-day passport if you have travel already booked. I've had colleagues do this for last-minute work travel.  </p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T22:30:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11554582</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11554582" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've got to admit, I used to work in the photo dept. at the Wal, however I was recently let go for not "upselling." I refused to try and sell customers sub-par Walgreens products and actually pointed quite a few customers to epassportphotos. Our film to DVD transfer is also a rip-off. If there is a local place that can do it, go through them, as Walgreen's has a large number of lost or messed up orders. I used to send customers to a local place around the corner until my manager found out and I was written up for it. Also, the company policy was to not process any orders with nudity or sexually explicit content, however I felt that if people really did not mind me seeing their pictures, I shouldn't mind printing them and putting them in an envelope. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T22:25:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11554538</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11554538" />
    <title>Comment from Ed Chan on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ed Chan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Meh, I've taken several passport pictures with a simple point &amp; shoot camera, printed them on an inkjet on photo paper, and cut them by hand.  Never had one rejected for either a visa or passport.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T22:24:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11554533</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11554533" />
    <title>Comment from Jevia on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jevia</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Grr, I wish this article had come out last week (ok, I'm a little recent to Consumerist). My husband and kids had to have "passport-type" photos for registration with the French government, so we went to a Rite-aid to do them, all 3 for $30. I didn't even realize that I could have done it on-line, or even at AAA for free.</p><br />
<p>At least when we need to actually renew our passports (I think mine and one kid is coming up next year), I'll keep this in mind.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T22:23:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11554499</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11554499" />
    <title>Comment from SunnyLea on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>SunnyLea</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11553168" rel="nofollow">jake7294</a>: Glad I'm not the only one who thought that. And with the Walgreens price for printing the photo, that's actually only 80 cents extra.</p>
<p>And why, exactly, should Walgreens want to subsidize someone else's passport photo service? They don't fill scripts paid for at CVS either.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T22:22:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11554444</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11554444" />
    <title>Comment from krista on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>krista</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550820" rel="nofollow">redskull</a>: The epassportphoto.com site helps you crop the photo to meet the requirements.</p>
<p>I have a hard time getting a nice expression in a posed photo... I tend to look a little crazy because I am usually nervous. It's not so much saving $8 that would tempt me to take my own passport photo, but the control I have over picking a good shot.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T22:20:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11554103</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11554103" />
    <title>Comment from Petra on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Petra</name>
        <uri>http://www.suchrubbish.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.suchrubbish.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I used epassportphoto and the site was absolutely wonderful. I didn't opt to have the photo sent to Walgreens though since we didn't have one at the time. I just saved it to a jump drive and went to WalMart. They didn't have any issues with me printing it there. In fact, the woman who cut them for me even commented on how nice it was and complained that she looked awful in her passport photo, and then asked another associate to come over and look 'at how pretty it was'. Admittedly that was a little weird, but in the end they still only charged me the normal cost of printing a 4x6 on the instant machines (24¢ if memory serves, but I'm not absolutely sure, it was awhile ago).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T22:11:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553780</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553780" />
    <title>Comment from Ilo on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ilo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>They did this to me too.  I just disguised the photo as part of a "Wanted" poster for a fake party invitation, and they printed it.  Clearly they didn't notice that all I had to do was trim the photo and I was all set.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T22:02:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553734</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553734" />
    <title>Comment from SarcasticDwarf on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>SarcasticDwarf</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550899" rel="nofollow">LegoMan322</a>: Not only that, but some memberships get passport photos for free from AAA (+RV I believe).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T22:01:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553721</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553721" />
    <title>Comment from David Brodbeck on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>David Brodbeck</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11553601" rel="nofollow">metaled</a>: I had to go to city hall and submit mine by mail, but it's possible the USPS still does it too.  I was a little nervous they wouldn't accept my birth certificate because it's a very old official copy, basically a bad 1970s photocopy on paper with "THIS LINE IS RED ON AN OFFICIAL COPY" and a flat rubber-stamp seal as the only proof of authenticity.  It certainly wouldn't have passed muster with the "Obama isn't a citizen" conspiracy theorists. ;)  But the State Department apparently felt it was good enough.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T22:01:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553601</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553601" />
    <title>Comment from metaled on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>metaled</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11551192" rel="nofollow">Onion_Volcano</a>: They don't let you apply in person at the USPS anymore?  Just take several with you and apply in person for your passport.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:57:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553594</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553594" />
    <title>Comment from David Eckert on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>David Eckert</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I had a passport photo taken at CVS.  As was mentioned above, they pulled out a little point and shoot camera, pullled down a screen, and took my photo.  Then they popped out the card and stuck it into their self-serve photo kiosk.  There was an option buried in there to make "ID photos".  It let you mark where the top of the head and chin were so it would crop it to the right size for a passport, then printed out 6 2x2s on a single 4x6.  Total cost, $7.99.</p>
<p>When it was time for my daughter's passport, we decided to take the photo ourselves.  Without using any online service or templates, we just popped the card out of our camera and into the photo kiosk.  I found the ID template and my my daughter's photo set.  I printed out the 4x6 and took it to the register.  Total price: $0.19.</p>
<p>I guess they charge $7.80 for camera rental, studio backdrop, photographer, and graphic artist's fee.  Actually, pretty cheap when you think about it :p</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:57:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553493</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553493" />
    <title>Comment from Phexerian on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phexerian</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Next time anyone asks, say it is for a work badge, an application for a school or employment, a head shot for a  published article, or another other excuse you can think of.</p>
<p>However, Walgreens is known for being anal assholes.  I hope walgreens and CVS both go under.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:54:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553488</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553488" />
    <title>Comment from David Brodbeck on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>David Brodbeck</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550899" rel="nofollow">LegoMan322</a>: I think it was $5 when I had it done a couple of years ago.</p>
<p>For me it was worth it.  By the time I set everything up to take a good head shot and got it printed I would have burned up more than $5 worth of my time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:54:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553425</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553425" />
    <title>Comment from Skaperen on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Skaperen</name>
        <uri>http://skaperen.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://skaperen.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550811" rel="nofollow">jsbeagle</a>: I did my own passport photos many years ago.  It was done in a room with white walls, and lots of light hitting the other walls and ceiling.  No flash was needed.  The usual flash device would make bad shadows.  I did this long before digital cameras so I didn't do the 5-in-1 trick.  I just did 1-in-1 and had duplicate prints made of the best frame from the negatives.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:52:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553412</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553412" />
    <title>Comment from LavenderSoap on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>LavenderSoap</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11552669" rel="nofollow">Will Darden</a>: The cost of the photo itself should be based on content; the cost of printing the photo should not. People here aren't buying the images. They are just buying printing services for photos they had taken elsewhere (or just took themselves).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:52:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553395</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553395" />
    <title>Comment from professorjonathan on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>professorjonathan</name>
        <uri>http://www.tourolaw.edu</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tourolaw.edu">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm glad I got my family's passport photos via this method and Walgreen's last year.  Mine's coming up for renewal soon; looks like I'll be printing them elsewhere.  {ProfJonathan}</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:51:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553317</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553317" />
    <title>Comment from courtarro on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>courtarro</name>
        <uri>http://www.hydrous.net/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hydrous.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11551192" rel="nofollow">Onion_Volcano</a>: If they truly charged $8 for their photography services, that's legitimate. The problem here is that they're trying to charge $8 to print a photo after the photographer has already done the hard work themselves (i.e. determining the requirements, framing the photo properly, exposing properly, etc.).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:49:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553257</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553257" />
    <title>Comment from courtarro on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>courtarro</name>
        <uri>http://www.hydrous.net/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hydrous.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550964" rel="nofollow">Scuba Steve</a>: Exactly. I'm in the business of getting the best bang for my buck. I do that by visiting The Consumerist on a regular basis. The Consumerist is in the business of helping me get a good deal, in return for ad revenue.</p>
<p>If Walgreens is in the business of charging me a 4200% premium for a print based on factors that do not affect their printing costs, then I'm in the business of avoiding them as a printer. It's the circle of life!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:47:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553237</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553237" />
    <title>Comment from j-o-h-n on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>j-o-h-n</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11551130" rel="nofollow">Jim Topoleski</a>: Really, anybody can do this -- when my high school french club went to France I took pretty much everyone's right there against the classroom wall -- not one rejection.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:47:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553204</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553204" />
    <title>Comment from kathyl on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>kathyl</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11551428" rel="nofollow">IvanaOtter</a>: They should be concerned. They are offering a service (and apparently counting on the profit margin) that people who are savvy enough to do the work themselves are finding themselves not in need of. The trick to staying in business is offering a service that is needed for a price the customer believes is fair.</p>
<p>And yes, obviously no advice should be offered by any employee about passport photo regulations if that expertise is part of a service you charge a fee for. Doesn't sound like the OP asked any questions at all, nor does epassportphoto.com sound like they're asking for any handouts. They're merely asking to print a photo at a standard size on standard paper just like any other photo and their business is being turned away. Seems pretty short-sighted to me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:46:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553172</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553172" />
    <title>Comment from courtarro on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>courtarro</name>
        <uri>http://www.hydrous.net/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hydrous.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11552669" rel="nofollow">Will Darden</a>: That's when you're paying for the content of the photo. We're not paying Walgreens to provide the content - we're paying them to put a bunch of pixels on the paper. What kind of pixels makes no difference in their costs, so we shouldn't have to pay a different amount.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:45:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553168</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553168" />
    <title>Comment from jake7294 on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>jake7294</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wait...so the e-service charges $7 and Walgreens charges $7.99? Just pay the extra .99 cents for crying out loud...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:45:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553052</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553052" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I actually printed my passport pictures a few weeks ago at Walgreens without a problem. Of course, I had made them myselves in photoshop.

<p>Maybe wallgreens checks specifically for the epassportphoto.com photos?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:41:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553041</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553041" />
    <title>Comment from Greasy Thumb Guzik on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Greasy Thumb Guzik</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11551948" rel="nofollow">Alexander Thomas</a>: <br />
And absolutely no one in America outside of Walgreen's has access to an Ingento paper trimmer?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:41:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11553022</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11553022" />
    <title>Comment from kathyl on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>kathyl</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550714" rel="nofollow">jamesdenver</a>: Heck, they're losing money from me too, and not just photo finishing money. (I find their prints to not be all that great anyway. The last Walgreens where I got a couple of prints made gave me some grainy-looking mess compared to the print I later received from an online photo processor.)</p>
<p>I was planning to trek over to the Walgreens near me today to see if they had any soda on sale (as I usually do when there's not a good sale on that item at Target or the grocery store) but I'll skip that little trip after reading this. Sorry, Walgreens. I don't like to patronize bullies.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:40:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11552982</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11552982" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I renewed my passport recently. I read through all the literature, and was concerned that printing a photo on my inkjet would not be accepted, so I spent $10 at Rite-Aid to have photos taken. The size of my face in the Rite-Aid photos was unacceptable per the passport requirements. I decided to print my own on the inkjet, and they were accepted without comment.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:39:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11552967</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11552967" />
    <title>Comment from Greasy Thumb Guzik on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Greasy Thumb Guzik</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11551428" rel="nofollow">IvanaOtter</a>: <br />
No one has said that they're asking for your help.<br />
They've already taken the photos &amp; formatted them using either an online service or their own software.<br />
Your drugstore is just the printer!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:39:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11552895</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11552895" />
    <title>Comment from kathyl on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>kathyl</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550604" rel="nofollow">Randy Treibel</a>: I'm tired of feeling like I'm paying dues to businesses because they seem to feel entitled to staying solvent without offering value for my money and services I'm happy to fork over for.</p>
<p>Do something helpful and useful and you have a much better chance of success than going the bully route and trying to protect lines of business that are no longer capable of keeping you in the black without doing something unethical. (I'm also looking at you, companies whose main line of profit seems to be offering extended warranties.)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:36:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11552669</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11552669" />
    <title>Comment from Will Darden on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Will Darden</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550714" rel="nofollow">jamesdenver</a>:</p>
<p>Photo prices are almost always based on content, which is why professional photographers charge more for their work.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:28:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11552583</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11552583" />
    <title>Comment from nix-elixir on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>nix-elixir</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Not only do I take passport photos daily, but I recently had mine processed and I watched every person in line before me have their photos rejected by the sassy USPS lady.  Taking passport photos is a skill that not everyone has.  You are paying for our expertise, state of the art equipment, et cetera that you don't have.  Now, if someone wants to do it themselves, have at it!  My company doesn't charge a passport photo price unless we took it but I get customers that "do it themselves" all the time and then come back and yell at us when whatever they did didn't work out for them.  Perhaps Walgreens doesn't want to get wrangled into battles like this?</p>
<p>Also, photo content will forever be a concern for anyone in the retail printing business simply for legal copyright reasons.  Sorry.  Maybe people think that printers can just churn it out without looking at the photo they're printing but that's not how it works.  That and quality, however, would be the only reasons I would ever look at the content.</p>
<p>Regular American passports, btw, aren't required to have a signature on the back of the photos submitted so asking a company to do it for you when you really took it yourself wouldn't be a concern.  Perhaps if you need a signature, you could sign it yourself?  All it says is they need the photographer's signature right?  You're the photographer.  Nowhere does it say that the photographer can't be the subject too right?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:26:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11552401</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11552401" />
    <title>Comment from Ben Sussman on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ben Sussman</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>This whole discussion is rediculous. In the U.S., if you follow their photo guidelines at the State Dept. website, anybody with a basic point-and-shoot can snap a passport photo that qualifies. You can also print it yourself on just about any $150 inkjet printer. I have taken dozens of PP pix for friends &amp; relatives over the years with all types of cameras, &amp; haven't a single reject!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:19:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11552384</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11552384" />
    <title>Comment from Corporate_guy on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Corporate_guy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550935" rel="nofollow">SnickerDoodle</a>: "A retailer taking passport photos puts their integrity on the line, leading to the higher cost for a couple of photos"  LOL.  That does not make a simple photo more expensive.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:18:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11552346</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11552346" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>You don't even need to send the photos to the drugstore to be printed, you can print them yourself with a good inkjet printer. 

<p>This FAQ from the US Dept of State:</p>

<p><a href="http://travel.state.gov/passport/guide/digital/digital_880.html" rel="nofollow">http://travel.state.gov/passport/guide/digital/digital_880.html</a></p>

<p>says that it's perfectly fine to use a digital camera and a digital printer to make passport photos, so long as the result is "high quality and photo-like in appearance".</p>

<p>I recently did passport photos for my wife and myself. I used a Canon A590 point-and-shoot camera, sized the photos at epassportphoto.com, adjusted the brightness a little bit in Photoshop Elements, and printed them on glossy paper on a Canon Pixma 6600 printer. The resulting pictures were better than the off-center ones I got for free at AAA, and the Passport Office apparently had no issues with them, as we mailed our old expired passports in and got our new passports with our home-made photos back in a bout 3 weeks. </p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:17:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11552278</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11552278" />
    <title>Comment from Red_Eye on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Red_Eye</name>
        <uri>http://www.patentlystupid.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.patentlystupid.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Digital Photo sent to Walgreens for passport: $.19<br />
Argument with Walgreens over if it is for passport, resolution: $7.99<br />
Coming back from a month traveling abroad with thousands of digital pictures needing processing and driving past the Walgreens that shafted you for your passport picture: PRICELESS</p>
<p>The only difference between hindsight and forethought is when you bother to think things through.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:15:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11552211</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11552211" />
    <title>Comment from UnemployedPuke on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>UnemployedPuke</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>If you have a photo printer and digital camera, why even bother with ePassport.com? Guidelines for photos:</p><br />
<p><a href="http://travel.state.gov/pdf/Photo%20Guide%2010-01-04.pdf" rel="nofollow">[travel.state.gov]</a></p><br />
<p>Have someone take your picture:</p><br />
<p>Use a room with a lot of natural indirect sunlight filtering in. Stand at least a foot from a LIGHT colored wall, off-white, eggshell, etc., preferably a flat, non-reflective finish. Have the photographer take your picture about six feet away from you using NO FLASH. Use your favorite photo editing tool, apply any brightness, color correction, cropping, sizing, and print according to the reqirements above. Cut the pics to a 2x2 size.</p><br />
<p>I've done this several times for friends and family without a problem.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:12:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11552130</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11552130" />
    <title>Comment from MrsLopsided on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>MrsLopsided</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't know about the US, but in Canada the photos must have the name &amp; address of the photographer on the back. There are stringent rules about size and shadows and many photos are rejected and have to be retaken - wasting weeks of processing time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:09:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11552105</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11552105" />
    <title>Comment from roshambo on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>roshambo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>That is not a big deal. I had my Canadian passport photo done at a US Costco as I was unaware that options like this existed. I myself wrote on the back of one stating that it was from Costco and I wrote their address. My Aunt signed to state the photo was me as it does not state the photographer has to. I had no problems. The rules have been relaxed now that they have had to get just about everyone a passport. 75% of Canadian adults now have them. If you are one of the few that doesn't though, the one thing they are incredibly anal about is the photo itself. No shadows, no smile and all the other regulations. An option like this epassport thing seems good as you can take in a couple different ones and let them chose to prevent being sent away.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:08:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11552028</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11552028" />
    <title>Comment from KixStar on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>KixStar</name>
        <uri>http://www.myspace.com/kixstar</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.myspace.com/kixstar">
        <![CDATA[<p>LoL. I actually work in a Walgreen's photo lab.  The big deal is that we take the picture in the store.  Then we can make the background stark white.  You might not be able to do that at home.  Also, we have a handy little tool that punches the pictures out of the paper perfectly, in case customers can't work scissors properly.</p>
<p>It's all very legit.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:06:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551994</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551994" />
    <title>Comment from Alexander Thomas on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alexander Thomas</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Also you are not supposed to have any shadows, the picture on here would be denied most likely. That was the worst when someone came back cause it got denied.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:05:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551948</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551948" />
    <title>Comment from Alexander Thomas on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alexander Thomas</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I was the head photo tech at walgreens for a while. digital cameras are what we use. the software does put it into two or more (depending on location) and yes we cut them. which btw is a pain cause you cant have ANY uneven edges.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:03:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551885</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551885" />
    <title>Comment from BytheSea on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>BytheSea</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Passport photos are an enormous ripoff. I paid the $7 thinking I was getting the knowledge about how to size it correctly and profesional equipment. The clerk at CVS pulled out a dinged up antique digital camera, took my picture against their super-special pull-down screen, uploaded it into their customer photo computers, touched three buttons on the screen, and charged me for her forty-five seconds of work.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:01:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551865</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551865" />
    <title>Comment from RattedOutAnneFrank!_GitEmSteveDave on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>RattedOutAnneFrank!_GitEmSteveDave</name>
        <uri>http://www.CanItKillTheGrimace.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.CanItKillTheGrimace.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550542" rel="nofollow">Vanilla5</a>: Just make sure you don't get the "dog food" or "chopped meat" scented paper, cuz then Customs might take longer than normal.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T21:00:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551837</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551837" />
    <title>Comment from Xerloq, we are all made of stars. on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Xerloq, we are all made of stars.</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Since most photographers hold the copyright for photos they take, it must be that Wallgreen's is mad because they 'should have' held the copyright on the photos you're printing... at least that's the only twisted logic that I can see they would allow them to charge more.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:59:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551834</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551834" />
    <title>Comment from richcreamerybutter on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>richcreamerybutter</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11551130" rel="nofollow">Jim Topoleski</a>: I went to the local photo/frame store, mainly because they are a mom and pop business and I like to patronize neighborhood places. These instructions are by no means difficult, but I also know that the proprietor is a pro (lighting included).</p>
<p>I set aside a day for passport photos and want to make sure my hair and makeup are perfect (remember, 10 years!). I try to be as relaxed as possible, because there's nothing like a JFK customs inspector LAUGHING at your passport upon arrival...it's not like you can be a smartass since that will guarantee a thorough searching of your bags.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:59:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551770</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551770" />
    <title>Comment from shepd on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>shepd</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  Last time I had a passport photo done, you couldn't get it done yourself as it required a stamp on the back indicating it was a passport photo, and a signature/initials of the technician who took the photo.</p>
<p>I suppose you could somehow get such a stamp, but I expect it would be regulated by the government somehow.</p>
<p>This has changed somehow?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:56:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551740</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551740" />
    <title>Comment from jamesdenver on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>jamesdenver</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@ IvanaOtter</p><br />
<p>You're right - but I don't think in these cases people were printing their 4x6s then asking Walgreens to proof them. They want to walk in, print their photos (which is their own GD business,) pay and walk out.</p><br />
<p>The specifications and details come from ePassport photo, and they even offer an acceptance guarantee.</p><br />
<p>Also in my experiences "care and diligence" are not words I'd use to describe the traits of most Walgreen's staff. Sorry.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:55:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551684</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551684" />
    <title>Comment from Rectilinear Propagation on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rectilinear Propagation</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550604" rel="nofollow">Randy Treibel</a>: They don't make any profit without offering goods and/or services.</p>
<p>You can't have a "because we want more money" fee and not expect customers to go elsewhere. It's not like customers exist just to fork over cash.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:53:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551680</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551680" />
    <title>Comment from TheRedSeven on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>TheRedSeven</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Also, if you have AAA, they will take your passport photos for free. FREE!  All you have to do is find one of their retail branches, which is pretty easy in most urban/suburban areas (much more difficult in rural areas).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:52:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551661</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551661" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I blame the OP for sending in a headshot of his (adorable) kitteh by mistake.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:52:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551578</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551578" />
    <title>Comment from Underpants Gnome on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Underpants Gnome</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11551509" rel="nofollow">Shadowman615</a>: Sad part is that the rejected photos were the $6 "professional" ones from the Costco photo center.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:49:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551509</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551509" />
    <title>Comment from Shadowman615 on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shadowman615</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550558" rel="nofollow">Underpants Gnome</a>: It isn't hard if you can competently follow directions. In 2004 my wife and I took and printed our own passport photos following those same specs listed by Jim T.  No problems whatsoever.</p>
<p>But I'm not saying any dimwit could do it...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:46:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551428</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551428" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I work in store management at a large drugstore chain (Not Walgreens) and while I personally don't care what people print I can see how others can be concerned- not rightfully, but when it appears that someone is circumventing one of their biggest moneymakers (7 dollars for a few cents worth of photo paper?) many people freak out.

<p>My own thinking is that the $7 is paying for the digital passport camera, the time of the employee taking the picture, and (if you go to the right store) the care and diligence in making sure the picture fits all requirements.  If someone is printing a 4x6 off of a kiosk, they can go ahead; they'll get no help or advice from us on U.S. passport regulations.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:42:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551379</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551379" />
    <title>Comment from johnva on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>johnva</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11551192" rel="nofollow">Onion_Volcano</a>: yeah, I'm sure the "professionals" at Walgreens never take passport photos that get rejected...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:41:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551351</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551351" />
    <title>Comment from meechybee on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>meechybee</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>Don't bother trying to take a nice picture. I just had my passport renewed and they go through lengths to make even a nice photo horrible.</p>
<p>They now scan the photo, badly, blow it up until you can see the pixels and re-crop it so your head fills almost the entire frame. I was never vain about my passport photo before and had the last one done at Kinko's (as an example). But the way it appears on the passport now is so warped that it doesn't look like me at all. My head looks huge with red blotches all over my face.</p>
<p>My mother didn't even think it was me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:39:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551294</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551294" />
    <title>Comment from springboks on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>springboks</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Walgreens photo kiosks are pretty archaic to begin with. Their staff are super nosy, they look at all your personal photos and make conversation. I went to get my photos done at a Walgreens because of a coupon I got in the mail, despite what I saved in $$ the experience was terrible. It took them 50mins to print out some 25 photos. They screwed up my total bill, so I left with a few stapled receipts. I'm done with Walgreens. I hope CVS brings them down like Best Buy did Circuit City.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:38:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551192</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551192" />
    <title>Comment from Onion_Volcano on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Onion_Volcano</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>pay the 8 dollars. The Govt. is very strict. I usually go to a professional photographer in town, he does a great job and charges 10 dollars.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:33:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551130</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551130" />
    <title>Comment from Jim Topoleski on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jim Topoleski</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550820" rel="nofollow">redskull</a>: It isnt that hard. From the gov travel website.</p>
<p>1) Frame subject with full face, front view, eyes open</p>
<p>2) Make sure photo presents full head from top of hair to bottom of chin; height of head should measure 1 inch to 1-3/8 inches (25 mm to 35 mm)</p>
<p>3) Center head within frame (see Figure 2 below)<br />
 <br />
4) Make sure eye height is between 1-1/8 inches to 1-3/8 inches (28 mm and 35 mm) from bottom of photo</p>
<p>5) Photograph subject against a plain white or off-white background <br />
 <br />
6) Position subject and lighting so that there are no distracting shadows on the face or background<br />
 <br />
7) Encourage subject to have a natural expression</p>
<p>I mean really if you would rather trust a guy making 7 bucks a hour to know better than you, sure go ahead. But even a dunce should be able to follow the guidelines and do this. Its not hard.</p>
<p>And better yet if you do it yourself you can guarantee the guidelines are right, I have heard of people having store bought passport photos rejected all the time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:31:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551126</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551126" />
    <title>Comment from johnva on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>johnva</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550573" rel="nofollow">Radi0logy</a>: I had a nearly identical experience at one point (except it wasn't China). That's when I learned that USPS "delivery guarantees" are essentially meaningless. Yeah, they refunded my postage when they delivered my package really late, but that wasn't my main concern. My main concern was the reason I sent it via Express Mail in the first place. If speed is a concern, USPS is not the place to go.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:31:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551096</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551096" />
    <title>Comment from runchadrun on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>runchadrun</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550517" rel="nofollow">Mooshie</a>: When I got new passport photos 2 years ago at Walgreens they used a digital camera then printed it on their regular photo printing equipment.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:29:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11551012</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11551012" />
    <title>Comment from SnickerDoodle on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>SnickerDoodle</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is from the ePassportPhoto.com site (not official or legal)</p>
<p>The official Canadian requirements state that the name of the photographer, address and date is provided on the back of one photo. This information may be handwritten by the photographer. Note that ePassportPhoto.com cannot provide this signature as we are not the photographer</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:26:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550964</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550964" />
    <title>Comment from Scuba Steve on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Scuba Steve</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@Randy Treibel</p><br />
<p>"We forget they are not in existance to serve us, but to profit from us. "</p><br />
<p>Who can forget when we have people like you to blame the consumer for wanting some sort of value from a company?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:24:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550961</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550961" />
    <title>Comment from garfield1979 on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>garfield1979</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550517" rel="nofollow">Mooshie</a>: Actually walgreen doesnt even do it that way anymore, they use a regular digital camera and the software arranges 2 on normal photo paper.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:24:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550935</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550935" />
    <title>Comment from SnickerDoodle on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>SnickerDoodle</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>For the record, Canadian rules are different.</p>
<p>the photo you submit must have an information stamp on the back with the date, location and a signature indicating that the photo is of who they say it is. A retailer taking passport photos puts their integrity on the line, leading to the higher cost for a couple of photos</p>
<p>Saying that, you can still get it done inexpensively, there is no need to pay upwards of $20 for your passport photos.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:23:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550899</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550899" />
    <title>Comment from LegoMan322 on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>LegoMan322</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If you are a member of AAA, they do it for you for $2 I think.  Super fast and easy.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:22:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550820</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550820" />
    <title>Comment from redskull on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>redskull</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11550558" rel="nofollow">Underpants Gnome</a>: Exactly. There are all kinds of arcane and Byzantine rules about how a passport photo must be composed; how much space must be left around your head, color of the background, size of your head in the frame, and on and on. Any one miscalculation can result in a rejection. I'd much rather pay $8 for a sheet of them and know it was done right then try to do it myself and fail.</p>
<p>And honestly, compared to all the other costs I incurred preparing for my trip to China a few years ago, $8 was a bargain.</p>
<p>Also, I got my passport photos taken at CVS Pharmacy and got a sheet of 8 or 10 photos for $8.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:19:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550811</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550811" />
    <title>Comment from jsbeagle on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>jsbeagle</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Printed mine at wal mart a year ago. No problems. I used a photoshop template I found online.</p>
<p>It does take a little prep with the camera and lighting to get it right. Go to the US passport page to get the facts on that stuff.</p>
<p>I had to set up a small lamp between the back of the subject and the wall in addition to using a flash on the camera to get the lighting right (no shadows).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:19:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550793</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550793" />
    <title>Comment from jamesdenver on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>jamesdenver</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@ Randy Treibel-</p><br />
<p>That's not the point. The point is that I'm coming in to print a 4x6 photo, not use THEIR photography/passport service.</p><br />
<p>They content of my photo should be considered irrelevant. I'm simply using their PHOTO PRINTING service.</p><br />
<p>That's why I said tell them "I'm printing a work badge." and see what they try to charge you...</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:18:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550741</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550741" />
    <title>Comment from EarlNowak on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>EarlNowak</name>
        <uri>http://myspace.com/ungarsfragile</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://myspace.com/ungarsfragile">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've used their site a few times- not for actual passport photos, but for "passport size" photos for visas.</p>
<p>I get my prints at CVS.  Instant prints are 29¢, one hour prints are 19¢.  No problems at all.  Never tried walgreens, and now I'm glad.  Between this and ending their rebate program next month, I'm going to be done with wags pretty soon.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:16:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550714</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550714" />
    <title>Comment from jamesdenver on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>jamesdenver</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I posted on this yesterday and couldn't believe Walgreens called ePassport Photo a "scam" - especially when ePassport Photo doesn't charge ANYTHING for their site. (they make money off ads.)</p><br />
<p>Seems to me the scam is Walgreen's charging for photos based on content rather than minding their own business and charging for quantity and size. The content of a photo is irrelevant and should not create any decision whatsoever on Walgreen's part.</p><br />
<p>If you wanted to challenge Walgreens you could send your 4×6 headshots in and say they're for your work security badge or future mug shot. Try it and then see what track the logic train ends up on.</p><br />
<p><a href="http://www.futuregringo.com/index.php/2009/03/22/walgreens-vs-epassport-photo/" rel="nofollow">[www.futuregringo.com]</a></p><br />
<p>People that find ePassport photo's site are STILL going to use it, so in addition to being a bully Walgreens is screwing themselves out of money derived from regular photo printing. They're also losing money from people like me, who having learned of this nonsense will take my photo printing elsewhere when needed.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:15:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550692</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550692" />
    <title>Comment from billlnv on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>billlnv</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>This is just another way that Walgreen's is trying to make money off of people. Use their service or pay a steep price. As long as the photos are not copyrighted you can have them printed at Wal-mart chepaer than 7.99.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:14:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550656</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550656" />
    <title>Comment from blazergst on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>blazergst</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>You could always just toss it in with the latest batch of vacation pics. Are they really going to check 40 or so pictures for a passport look alike photo?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:13:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550604</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550604" />
    <title>Comment from Randy Treibel on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Randy Treibel</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Corporations want to make money? Seems standard. We forget they are not in existance to serve us, but to profit from us.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:11:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550584</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550584" />
    <title>Comment from pockygt on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>pockygt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>You think that's bad, when i worked at Ritz, we charged _$15.99_ for these same stupid things.  I guess the rounded cutter for 2x2 pics is expensive...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:10:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550573</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550573" />
    <title>Comment from Radi0logy on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Radi0logy</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of the nightmare I had trying to get a Visa to China accepted. Long story short, USPS took 7 days to deliver an overnight delivery and I almost missed my flight. I know, I know, nothing to do with original article, I just get steamed when I think about it</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:10:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550558</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550558" />
    <title>Comment from Underpants Gnome on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Underpants Gnome</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Careful with those passport photos, a co-worker of mine had his rejected by the gubbermint because of shadows behind him like in your sample photo there.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:10:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550551</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550551" />
    <title>Comment from picardia on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>picardia</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I have used photos from a carnival booth for a passport. Trimmed to the proper dimensions, they worked fine.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:09:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550542</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550542" />
    <title>Comment from Vanilla5 on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Vanilla5</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I might pay $8 for a strawberry-scented passport photo. But a regular one? Not so much.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:09:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550517</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550517" />
    <title>Comment from Mooshie on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mooshie</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Walgreen's passport photo camera is just a specialty poloroid camera that makes two copies.  Then the photo guy cuts the two photos with a little tool.</p>
<p>Drug stores should be looking into replacing photo labs with something more profitable.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:08:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838-comment:11550482</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5179838" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/walgreens-doesnt-want-you-to-print-your-own-passport-photos.html#c11550482" />
    <title>Comment from jscott73 on 2009-03-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>jscott73</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I did this about a month ago for my wife's passport, epassportphoto.com was great, very easy to use with clear instructions.  I sent the file to my local Target and picked the photo up an hour later for $0.19.  They are still processing her passport but they cashed the check I sent in so hopefully the photo was fine.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-23T20:07:17Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



