<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T13:13:07Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for <![CDATA[AT&amp;T Might Charge You For &quot;Free&quot; Mobile-To-Mobile Calls Unless You Notice]]></title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5181321" title="AT&amp;T Might Charge You For &quot;Free&quot; Mobile-To-Mobile Calls Unless You Notice" />
    <published>2009-03-24T05:05:29Z</published>
    <updated>2009-03-24T05:05:43Z</updated>
    <title>AT&amp;T Might Charge You For &quot;Free&quot; Mobile-To-Mobile Calls Unless You Notice</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[-->Jeff canceled one of the two lines on his AT&T Mobility family plan, and on his next bill he noticed the remaining line had been charged for mobile-to-mobile calls on the AT&T network&mdash;even though those minutes are supposed to be free.]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Chris Walters</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="AT&amp;T" />
    
    <category term="Other Shopping" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/31/2009/03/032309-006-cellphones158.jpg" height="158" width="158" class="left" />-->Jeff canceled one of the two lines on his AT&T Mobility family plan, and on his next bill he noticed the remaining line had been charged for mobile-to-mobile calls on the AT&T network&mdash;even though those minutes are supposed to be free.</p>
]]>
      <![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I recently canceled one of my AT&T cellphone accounts.  It was part of two accounts configured as an AT&T friends and family account.  The remaining account, used by my spouse, reverted to a single AT&T cellphone line advertised on their website with the features free 'same network mobile to mobile' and free 'nights and weekends' calls.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, a close review of the first bill received after the audit showed that we were being debited minutes for 'same network mobile to mobile' and 'nights and weekend' calls.  When we called AT&T and questioned this, the CSR confirmed that it was a feature of the product we had changed to, but that customer's must call and ask that these features be turned on.</p>
<p>In my opinion, this is grossely misleading.  Isn't this similar to buying a car with power steering, but being required to actually 'request' the power steering before it is installed?</p>
<p>Pretty sneaky AT&T.  The CSR was able to reverse the debited minutes for the currently active billing cycle, but was unable to adjust the bill for the previous period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Any time you change your cell phone situation, pay close attention to the bill to make sure the changes go through, and that something unexpected isn't applied. </p>
<p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tudor/160411311/">TheGiantVermin</a>)</p>
]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11699611</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11699611" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-03-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11580105" rel="nofollow">Randa the Panda</a>:  With you here.  Current AT&T rep, and I've never seen a plan change remove the M2M feature; it's possible the plan he was moved to did not, as another commenter suggested, include M2M calling.

<p>Not re-rating other bills honestly sounds like laziness; it takes a LOT of time to figure out which numbers were not correctly rated.  But that's what offline commitment teams are for, anyway.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-29T09:26:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11628401</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11628401" />
    <title>Comment from Hybriddeathdealer on 2009-03-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Hybriddeathdealer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T Wireless, Verizon and T-Mobile are now using 3rd party collection agencies, who are using barraging tactics on customers who are not late on their bills. Once your bill becomes due, this new 3rd party company starts using automated systems from all over the world, using varying phone numbers and leaving fallacious messages, in an effort to extort money from AT&amp;T's clients. Aside from the obvious implications, AT&amp;T has now lost control of their client's cell phone privacy. After you receive the first of these calls, various additional companies start calling from as far away as Russia and some that use numbers very close to your own. If you make the unfortunate mistake of answering the calls, you're then passed along to a supposed sales agent that tries to get you to switch to one of the competitive companies and then they will not stop calling, period. This initial 3rd party collection company is pitching sales to AT&amp;T customers and claim that they do not have to follow the same rules for the 'do not call' list, since they are already working for the company you use. What would prevent a consumer from exchanging their cell phone for a pay as you go. He agreed, but said this is their new policy. Always  report this type, or any type of abuse to <a href="http://www.ftc.gov" rel="nofollow">[www.ftc.gov]</a> , <a href="http://www.fcc.gov" rel="nofollow">[www.fcc.gov]</a> , the DNC list and <a href="http://www.bbb.org" rel="nofollow">[www.bbb.org]</a> .<br />
Now they can add that to the ever growing list of dirty tricks, like doubling billing the $10 additional line, and erroneously billing a la carte as they see fit.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-26T14:38:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11597394</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11597394" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-03-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Chris, nice article. I wanted to comment, however, that merely because we may successfully negotiate a lower cell bill does not in any way mean that we are on the optimal wireless plan for our usage. In other words, 80 percent of us are still getting ripped off. While your example AT&T customer, Jeff, definitely did his homework and got results, he may be able to do even better. I personally see these situations on a daily basis because I work for the consumer advocacy website <a href="http://www.fixmycellbill.com," rel="nofollow">http://www.fixmycellbill.com,</a> powered by a company called Validas, where we slash the average cell bill by 22 percent. I could go on and on about how shifty these cell companies can be in their attempts to make you overpay. At Validas, we stop them, and have currently put over $5 million back in the pockets of consumers. You can check out Validas’s fixmycellbill.com in the national news media, most recently on Good Morning America at <a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=6887412&page=1." rel="nofollow">http://www.abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=6887412&page=1.</a> 

<p>Good luck to everyone trying to regain control over their wireless bills.</p>

<p>Dylan</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-25T09:17:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11596261</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11596261" />
    <title>Comment from scoosdad on 2009-03-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>scoosdad</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11573926" rel="nofollow">gaya2081</a>: Great all around customer-centric attitude you got going there.  No wonder  you didn't mention the name of your company.</p>
<p>Let me translate:</p>
<p>1) "You calling or emailing us directly inconveniences <i><b>our</b></i> system."</p>
<p>2) "We don't communicate very well with each other internally (or not at all) so your information is constantly lost in the shuffle."</p>
<p>3) "You suck for being successful at actually reaching one of us and maybe getting us off our rear ends to help you."</p>
<p>and the best one,</p>
<p>"Do it again, and I'll flag your account so you don't ever get helped again no matter what."</p>
<p>Thank you for calling, is there anything else I can't help you with?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-25T07:51:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11594689</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11594689" />
    <title>Comment from MyDarlin on 2009-03-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>MyDarlin</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>My experience with switching to AT&amp;T from Verizon just this past week has been an overall nightmare! If I had to do it over again, I would have just stayed with Verizon. I never really had any major problems with them, but after being a 10 year customer, I sure wasn't getting any 'loyalty' benefits.<br />One of the issues with ATT was that they said we would get free TV for 60 days on our LG Vu. When we were unable to connect, I went back into the ATT store and was told I had to be in a 3G network for it to work. OK.<br />Later in the week we were in a 3G network and still no workie!<br />I called and was told I had to subscribe to the data plan to use the 'free' TV. So my question to the rep was, So the TV service isn't free then? Yes she insited it is free, but only if I subscribe to the data plan...then can I actually SEE the TV on the phone. Interesting!<br />Other issues were, our online order was mysterious cancelled (no one can tell us by whom) and then re-ordered incorrectly. I had to fix and re-fix the errors and blunders in the 2nd order, b/c they were not what I wanted.<br />I could go on...buy my head hurts just thinking about the nightmare this has become!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-25T06:08:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11592844</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11592844" />
    <title>Comment from robinkranch on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>robinkranch</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11574051" rel="nofollow">Taliskan</a>: I don't receive an itemized bill from AT&amp;T. Does it cost extra to have itemized bill sent? Now I am wondering since I have 4 phones on my plan.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-25T04:28:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11591132</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11591132" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>AT&T Wireless seems to have issues telling the truth.  A few years ago, I went to a company store wanting a new phone.  We were out of contract for over 6 months and were long time customers. But their price was too high.  The clerk told me to call the company and they may give me a better price.  I called them.  They gave me a price at about a third of the store price, but they told me the store would have to charge me the regular price (about $200 more), then they would credit my credit card account with the difference making the price the same as we agreed.  In the store, the clerk checked the notes on my account, verified the price and completed the transaction.  On my next bill, the difference was never shown as a credit.  

<p>Calling AT&T, I was told I could be offered a $50 credit.  When I told them the difference was about $200, I was told the CSR was only authorized to do $50.  She saw the notes and the bill and  agreed I was right, but wasn't able to help.  I asked to speak with a supervisor.  She said they weren't allowed to put calls through to supervisors.  </p>

<p>After going througn this process every day for a week or so, I got really angry.  I filed a complaint with the Texas Attorney General.  I had dates,names, receipts, etc. </p>

<p> In about 2 weeks, the AT&T people called me telling me they required me to fax the receipt to them to credit my card.  I told them there was a copy of the receipt on  the AG complaint.  The guy freaked.  Said he didn't know anything about an AG complaint.  Told me he'd call back.  Never heard from him again.  </p>

<p>A week or so later, I received a call from a woman in the "presidents office" telling me the issue had been resolved and asking me to notify the AG and cancel the complaint.  I asked her to hold on, called my credit card company to verify her story.  It wasn't credited yet.  So I told the woman who called that the complaint stood until I received proof from the credit card company that my card had been properly credited for the full amount.  She said it would be processed that day, and I replied then when it's done, I'll call off the AG.  </p>

<p>The next week I received notfication it was corrected.  THe credit card CSR told me it had just been received and processed that day.  I don't know how other cell companies are to deal with in this matter, but AT&T is the ABSOLUTE worst.  </p>

<p>We have AT&T home and broadband service and have zero problems.  Their customer service, in my experience, is first rate. </p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-25T03:09:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11582516</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11582516" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Most of the time, I'm a pretty understanding person, but I think that ATT is totally to blame for this.  Someone very competent chose the software that the computers use, someone very competent is aware that most of the low-level employees are HS educated, at best, and probably prone to making mistakes.  I would guess that, the majority of the time, when a mistake is made, it breaks in ATT's favor.  (if someone is not in a promo he thinks he is, he makes too many calls/texts, etc...  The default rates are almost always higher than advertised promos)  If I'm a bar owner and hire a known homophobic/racist/sexist steroid abusing bartender with anger issues, and he happens to injure a gay dude/minority/woman in a fight, I'm on the hook.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T22:46:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11580340</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11580340" />
    <title>Comment from LatherRinseRepeat on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>LatherRinseRepeat</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Any time you change calling plans or calling features, log on to your account on the ATT Wireless website and double-check everything. Here's a common annoyance that has been posted on some wireless forums..</p>
<p>All accounts have "pay per use" data. Meaning, you don't pay a recurring fee to access the web from your phone, and you only pay for what you use. However, if you later decide to add a monthly data plan, you must remove the "pay per use" feature from your account. Otherwise, you will still be charged for "pay per use" data, even though you are paying for an unlimited data plan.</p>
<p>I guess it's safe to say that ATT's billing/account software is about as smart are their customer service reps. ;-)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T21:48:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11580105</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11580105" />
    <title>Comment from RandaPanda on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>RandaPanda</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@ helloodiane (reply still not working for me!)</p><br />
<p>AT&amp;T wireless reps don't work on commission. At least not at the AT&amp;T call center where I used to work. The only thing we go was bonuses based on our stats within the call center, and that was it.</p><br />
<p>and @ Bodgy</p><br />
<p>That's not entirely true. When I quit from AT&amp;T, if someone was cancelling a line and moving from an family plan to an individual plan, the M2M feature was almost ALWAYS something that was already listed in the features tab on Telegence (which I'm just assuming is what was used, as that's the main program for MOST of AT&amp;T accounts). Unless they were inadvertantly activated on a plan that's not normally used, the mobile to mobile feature would not have to be added, it would already be there.</p><br />
<p>To me, it sounds like what happened was that whichever rep switched the account around screwed up. Plain and simple.</p><br />
<p>And bull crap that they can't make a credit for the past month's bills where this error was made. They may not have been able to do it on that particular bill, but they could have added a credit to the account in general for the amount of error. I did it all the time.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T21:41:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11577493</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11577493" />
    <title>Comment from brandymb on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>brandymb</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11570910" rel="nofollow">helloodiane</a>: If its just a mistake, then how come the company never gets humble, apologetic and makes it right toot sweet??</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T20:16:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11576664</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11576664" />
    <title>Comment from oneandone on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>oneandone</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@Taliskan - same thing happened to me with Verizon Wireless, except it was right at the beginning of my contract with them. The bill I got was HUGE and it turned out they has mis-entered or mis-coded something and not given me the unlimited night &amp; weekend minutes. I thought it was a really dumb error, since all of their contract plans included nights &amp; weekends.</p><br />
<p>CSR was very nice &amp; attempted to be helpful, but said she couldn't resend me a correct bill. Instead, they wanted me to pay the huge bill, and then they would credit me. Had a been a more savvy consumer, I probably would have stuck it out longer, but in the end I caved &amp; spent several hours trying to figure out which calls I was incorrectly billed for. And then the error persisted through the next 2 billing cycles.... big pain.</p><br />
<p>In the end, they did credit my account the correct amount &amp; I haven't had any problems since. But it was definitely the wrong foot to start off with. I am very suspicious of my bill. And I have a very, very low opinion of whatever VZW uses to process their contracts.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T19:46:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11575820</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11575820" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Taking any CSR's word, from any major company without verifying what they have stated with another CSR or a local contact (ie...ATT store) is just plain idiotic. Half the time, the CSR's state half-truth's or things that are just plain not true, either because they are dishonest or because they are completely ignorant. Don't assume this will be the case for everyone who cancels one line, errors are made all the time. It's funny how an error is automatically assumed to be something that is standard company policy, don't we all make errors everyday? Are we always to be defined by our fleeting moment of incompetence?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T19:13:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11575695</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11575695" />
    <title>Comment from yoni242 on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>yoni242</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Have been with AT&amp;T for many years and you do have to watch them. If you ever make a change they screw your whole account and you end up with charges that add up to and exceed 1000 dollars. They add charges and fees that seem to be pulled out of a hat, when you call them on it they seem to be removed. JUST REVIEW ALL YOUR BILLS</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T19:07:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11574279</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11574279" />
    <title>Comment from Sam2k on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sam2k</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Before attacking AT&amp;T, more information would be prudent.  All of AT&amp;T's rate plans do not feature free mobile to mobile calling.  This is frequently not a feature of the old rate plans that are sometimes grandfathered when you complain and may also arise when you do something like activating a new line without contract.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T17:51:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11574051</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11574051" />
    <title>Comment from Taliskan on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Taliskan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Verizon used to do this to me for quite a while when I upgraded my cell plan to a Family Share plan (added a second line to the account). They would charge for nights and weekends, and in-network. These were supposedly included in the plan price. The fact remained that neither me nor my buddy used many minutes so the overages weren't enough for me to notice from the regularly billed price.</p><br />
<p>One month the bill was outrageously high, and I looked at the itemized call list and noticed the mistake. I went back to the previous two months and saw the same. I call Verizon and they credited my account and said they fixed it. The following month I was charged again for nights and weekends and in-calling. Again, I call, credit, fed the line it's fixed. Needless to say this happened for a few more months until I spoke to a CSR and they said they didn't understand why it was happening. She finally fixed it and tossed me a couple promotions for my troubles which was quite nice. Occasionally something in their computers denies the included price of nights and weekends, and in-calling. I call up and the matter is usually resolved with a credit.</p><br />
<p>Now I have learned how important it is to look at that itemized list of phone calls. To think if I just accepted what they gave me at face value, I would have been paying extra for features that were supposedly included. Read those bills!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T17:25:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11573926</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11573926" />
    <title>Comment from gaya2081 on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>gaya2081</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11572717" rel="nofollow">jp7570</a>: That I can probably explain. The I use to be in technical support for the company I work for. Customers were never allowed to email us directly or call us directly for 2 reasons.<br />
1) Lack of tracking. If something happened we didn't have any proof in our call monitoring system of the call. Email was easier to track but customers would abuse it.<br />
2) If we were out or sick or the issue was reassigned the customer would not be helped as the new person did not have access to the prior communication.<br />
3) They would impact other customers wait times by circumnavigating the system-not fair to them.</p>
<p>So yes the first question out of my mouth would have been how did you get this number/email address. Then I would have helped them after getting their promise they would not do it again and making a note on their account. After their third strike we ignored any emails/calls from said customer that were not submitted through the proper channels.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T17:07:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11572876</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11572876" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>most of you people just don't understand how billing takes place.

<p>this person was probably charged for m2m because of an error or mistake on someone's part, not the company as a whole.  the person he talked to just tried to think of a stupid excuse for it because they could not explain it.  happens all the time.</p>

<p>and to the rest of you complaining: if you simply new how the system worked you would avoid all the mess and complaints you have.  most of what people bitch about is their own fault.  att/verizon/etc don't go out of their way to charge you for things, it's an automated system and it works well.  your understanding of how it works is just flawed.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T13:05:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11572717</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11572717" />
    <title>Comment from jp7570 on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>jp7570</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Thing is, no one at AT&amp;T seems to care when there is a problem. I was receiving texts from senders that were texting to my number by mistake.</p><br />
<p>I got an e-mail address for an AT&amp;T CSR from Consumerist and e-mailed her to see what AT&amp;T could do. She called me back, but her first question was "how did you get my e-mail?"</p><br />
<p>AT&amp;T has zero interest in resolving problems which may result in increased revenue to them.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T12:37:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11572417</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11572417" />
    <title>Comment from SquareBubbles on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>SquareBubbles</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Replies not working, eh?</p>
<p>@heliodane: If anything, the rep would have benefited from putting the feature ON their account.  That CSR is probably losing out a few bucks now in commission</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T11:49:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11571843</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11571843" />
    <title>Comment from ajlei on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>ajlei</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11571760" rel="nofollow">acwatts</a>: A looooooong time ago, when my mom and stepdad first got cell phones (early/mid 90s) and they only had like 100 minutes a month or something ridiculously small, they'd freak out if we left messages on them because apparently they'd get charged for the messages left, and then charged if they wanted to LISTEN to said messages. So, basically, a voicemail would cost double the minutes.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T10:34:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11571829</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11571829" />
    <title>Comment from ajlei on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>ajlei</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11570713" rel="nofollow">itsgene</a>: That's interesting.. in the past I've changed the text plans for various members of our family several times (to an entire-family texting plan currently) and they've always been on the cheaper side of billing. They'd prorate the new plan only for the days it'd been active for the current month and only charged the previous plan for the portion of the month I'd used it (like, maybe 75% of the cost). I was always mildly surprised and I'd check the bill and it was always how they said it would be.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T10:32:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11571760</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11571760" />
    <title>Comment from acwatts on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>acwatts</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Cell phones have another good racket going with international billing rates. In the airport in Taiwan I turned on my cell phone - just to see if it would reset to the local time etc. I did not do anything - no text messages, no calls etc. Switched it off 30 seconds later. A couple of callers had left me voice messages, so I got a voice message alert - and a $38 dollar bill because every minute of voice message was billed to me - at some super high rate - even though I didn't check them... They reversed this when I complianed - but how many just pay it?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T10:22:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11571524</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11571524" />
    <title>Comment from CityGuySailing on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>CityGuySailing</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5181321/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile+to+mobile-calls-unless-you-notice#c11570910" rel="nofollow">helloodiane</a>: Ya know, it just SEEMS that these errors are MOSTLY in the companies favor, and very very infrequently, in the consumers favor. In reality I'm SURE that is it 50/50... (said tongue-in-cheek).</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T09:56:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11571202</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11571202" />
    <title>Comment from JayCutlerhurtsmyhead on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>JayCutlerhurtsmyhead</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11568016" rel="nofollow">Bodgy</a>: I've had an ATT family plan for 5 years now and no matter how small every single change that a CSR or in-store salesperson makes to the account results in some feature being taken off or changed.  And every mistake they make leads to 2-3 obnoxious phone calls to correct it.</p>
<p>And if I don't notice it right away, they get a couple months worth of bogus charges out of me.  It's a sick, ridiculous game.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T09:20:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11570910</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11570910" />
    <title>Comment from helloodiane on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>helloodiane</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>its no secret that wireless reps work on commission, but contrary to your belief, reps DO NOT make commission off of overages.. whoever switched the plan to single line probably just forgot to add the code. it happens but i dont see any rep benefiting from this mistake.</p>
<p>i dont think its anything shady, just a mistake made on their part. ATT has millions of customers (bills), theyre not going to look through every single bill. anyway, they fixed the mistake with credits.</p>
<p>i dont see anything sneaky.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T08:56:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11570713</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11570713" />
    <title>Comment from itsgene on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>itsgene</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I had the 200 text message plan from AT&amp;T. I was nearing the limit, up to 180 messages, and decided to upgrade to the 1500 plan.<br />
When my bill arrived, I discovered that AT&amp;T, instead of upgrading to the new limit, canceled the first plan and prorated the 200 messages by the number of days. They calculated it to be 140-something messages, so they charged me for 40 messages a la carte. THEN they started the 1500 message plan, also appropriately prorated down to 400 messages.<br />
Boom, just like that, it cost me $4.00 in text charges PLUS the additional charges for a bigger plan. <br />
Sneaky bastards.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T08:41:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11570517</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11570517" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I hope verizon Wireless credited you because IF it does happen, which is much rarer now I can assure you, everyone I know has always credited it. Someone's text package fell off, this was like a year and a half ago, and they didn't notice till 3 bills later when they got a HUGE bill and I ended up crediting them almost 2 grand because it was a system error. I haven't had something important like that fall off for a LONG time though.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T08:27:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11569660</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11569660" />
    <title>Comment from Verucalise(countingcalories) on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Verucalise(countingcalories)</name>
        <uri>http://www.geocities.com/verucalyse</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.geocities.com/verucalyse">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Verizon did this to us about a year ago, we shared the same cell phone plan and yet, THEY BILLED US FOR TALKING TO EACHOTHER. On the Verizon network. On the same account. I found this out only when we were charged overages.</p><br />
<p>I went back thru 3 cell phone cycles to find that we were using almost our full plans worth of minutes... just talking to eachother! Verizon fixed it after an audit, but WTF.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T07:28:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11569656</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11569656" />
    <title>Comment from ccbweb on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>ccbweb</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This being Consumerist, you'd think it'd be a place where (especially when writing the posts) you'd get your head around the idea of mobile to mobile minutes being _included_ with your plan rather than _free_.  You're paying for the calls; you're just not paying (or you're not supposed to be paying) on a per minute basis for those particular calls.  AT&amp;T is not just giving you some free minutes on top of the ones you paid for.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T07:28:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11568900</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11568900" />
    <title>Comment from jfischer on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>jfischer</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>"<i>The CSR was able to reverse the debited minutes for the currently active billing cycle, but was unable to adjust the bill for the previous period.</i>"</p>
<p>This is a major and consistent problem in itself. Companies write themselves their own "statute of limitations" and pretend to do you a big favor by returning PART of the money they <b>steal</b> from you.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T06:33:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11568770</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11568770" />
    <title>Comment from vastrightwing on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>vastrightwing</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Being a casual consumer takes a lot of work. You constantly have to scrutinize everything because you will be ripped off. For instance, I like to remind people that you have much less of a chance of having your money stolen from your mattress than in a bank. I know, I know, this is counter intuitive. But consider that banks will charge you fees for keeping your money in their bank 100% of the time. If you are very clever, the bank will learn to be more clever than you and eventually the bank will take your money. How do I know? I used to be a Bank of America customer, a Sovereign Bank customer, a Fleet Bank customer, A wells Fargo Bank customer and currently a RBS (Royal Bank of Scotland) customer and every one of them has ripped me off repeatedly and I watch my accounts like a hawk. They will change their terms of service so you are forced to shuffle your accounts around, otherwise, you will be charged a fee. Credit cards will change your terms of service and force you to call them to change it back. Telecos... the same thing. I have to call Sprint almost every month due to billing issues. Sure, they fix my bill every time, but what an annoyance!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T06:26:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11568016</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11568016" />
    <title>Comment from Bodgy on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bodgy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Having worked in management there, I can tell how it happened.  When you were switched from a family talk plan to a single plan, the unlimited M2M code, which is plan specific, was not added.  They fibbed when they should have admitted the mistake.  Not surprisingly, it happened all the time.  for some reason, they can't bundle the codes to make it easier on the CSRs.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T05:39:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11567961</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11567961" />
    <title>Comment from Syrenia on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Syrenia</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c11567555" rel="nofollow">Lucky225</a>: I'm sensing that there's a story here...</p>
<p>:)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T05:35:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11567835</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11567835" />
    <title>Comment from Aertea on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Aertea</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T just likes to do dirty things to squeeze out a couple extra bucks.</p>
<p>A couple months ago my sister was billed $50 for text messages when she had the "Unlimited" text messaging plan.</p>
<p>Turns out AT&amp;T changed their pricing model for the unlimited text plans and downgraded her to 1000/month plan that was the same base price in the new model.  Of course, this was without telling her.  She got it straightened out with credit eventually, but such a waste of time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T05:28:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11567659</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11567659" />
    <title>Comment from LJKelley on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>LJKelley</name>
        <uri>http://www.startblue.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.startblue.net">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>AT&amp;T is making sure they don't lose in the first round of America's Worst Company.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T05:19:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11567639</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11567639" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>When I worked for AT&T (pre-cingular) this was typical of the billing system. Unless the customer agrees to a new contract, all the features and promotions are supposed to be removed. If you switch from one plan to another, all the promotions are dropped by the billing system. Things might have changed post-cingular, but representatives aren't supposed to give you any promotions without a contract renewal. You either pay for the feature or if it "was included with the rate plan" a promotion it was a new 2 year contact. The reporter might want to check their contract renewal date now.
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T05:18:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321-comment:11567555</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5181321" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/03/att-might-charge-you-for-free-mobile-to-mobile-calls-unless-you-notice.html#c11567555" />
    <title>Comment from Lucky225 on 2009-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lucky225</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>At least he wasn't charged international rates for a similar country code because he forgot to dial a 1 first like the billing error in vonage consumerist has yet to expose! &gt;:D</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-24T05:13:59Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



