Comments for Consumerist Friday Flickr Pool Finds

Consumerist Friday Flickr Pool Finds

2009-02-20T22:52:55Z

Here are five wonderful photos readers added to The Consumerist Flickr Pool this week, picked for neatness and usability in a Consumerist post. Check 'em out, vote for your fave!

Title: "Day 045/365 - The Sixth Circle of Hell: Lust"
Caption: "Happy Valentines Day, with the most appropriate of the Seven Deadly Sins - LUST!"
By: Great Beyond

]]> Title: "DSC_1320"
By: Brian Jackson Now

Title: "Bike Ride to 7-11"
By: The Notorious T.D.P

Title: "Curbside Parking"
Caption: "Saw this all by itself, perfectly parked next to the curb outside our house this evening. It's kinda sad when a kid can park better than a lot of adults on the street."
By: wednesday181

Title: "Fancy A Taste Love?"
By: The GlassPeople

Our Flickr Pool is the place where Consumerist readers go and upload photos for possible use in future Consumerist posts. Just be a registered Flickr user, go here, and click "Join Group?" up on the top right, and start hitting "send to group" on your individual photos you want to add to the pool.

Add your shots to The Consumerist Flickr pool, and perhaps they'll get featured in a future story, or even highlighted in a Friday Consumerist Flickr Pool Finds post. See previous winners of the Friday Consumerist Flickr Pool finds here.

Comment from OprahBabb on 2009-02-23

2009-02-23T16:37:13Z

@Trai_Dep: That one was a definite fave of mine.

Comment from madanthony on 2009-02-21

2009-02-21T22:55:51Z

@SexCpotatoes:

I wouldn't say he's in no danger - he could singe his tail...

And getting a cat to do anything is an accomplishment.

Comment from MightyDwarf56 on 2009-02-21

2009-02-21T12:43:40Z

@TheStig'sNJCousin_GitEmSteveDave: Though I couldn't get my cat to do a trick, she sure as hell likes to run around my apartment like a bat out of hell.

Comment from fatetwister64 on 2009-02-21

2009-02-21T07:06:00Z

@Vivelafat is the Quizat Haderach: Why are arguing. DAREDEVIL CAT! read that again. DAREDEVIL (already on the winning side)CAT (done! sold.) Green light this for a dreamworks animated movie.

Comment from fatetwister64 on 2009-02-21

2009-02-21T07:02:32Z

@Ben Popken: second

Comment from fatetwister64 on 2009-02-21

2009-02-21T07:01:25Z

Daredevil cat laughs in the face of all challangers! Then jumps over them.

Comment from El_Fez on 2009-02-21

2009-02-21T05:12:18Z

@ArtfulSlinger:
I can handle constructive criticism. Being a dick about it (like Vivelafat) or completely overreacting (like Pretty pretty Princess), on the other hand, is just being a troll.

And so I ask them to back up their words with deeds. If they think they are god's gift to photography, then lets see their amazing and creative work.

Comment from ArtfulSlinger on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T04:48:56Z

@Ben Popken: I don't get how she is a troll for expressing an opinion on a photo she didn't like. She gave her reasons and then had a seemingly appropriate discourse.

Comment from ArtfulSlinger on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T04:48:00Z

@El_Fez: To weigh in, why does she have to show a photo she took to say she doesn't like yours?

That makes no sense. We aren't in a class. You put your artwork out there to be judged and she did just that. Get over it. If her comment bothers you, I think you need to look for a new hobby.

Comment from Sean Gamble on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T03:18:46Z

@PrettyPrettyPrincess: Since when was a gossip blog a place for " intelligent discourse " ... i've seen jezebelle and the consumerist has far better writing, on the part of its staff, and more entertaining and intelegent commentation then jez.. so I dont see where your comming from "Princess"

Comment from El_Fez on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T02:43:15Z

Wait a second - which is it? You say this:

@PrettyPrettyPrincess:
It's amazing to me how people can live their everyday lives while taking themselves so seriously.

And then you turn around and say this:

@PrettyPrettyPrincess:
In all seriousness, is there no happy medium of sexiness between BJ-mouth and a Narwhal? I think woman, men, all sorts of things are sexy..but the objection here was that the red mouth depiction has been done a few times, and maybe a 'sexy' photo that doesn't portray women as mobile sucking mouths would be an interesting change. While women ARE hot, it doesn't mean we should all just shut up, open our lips, and let ourselves be objectified.

So which is it?

And, as far as objectification goes, my friend had a problem with it, then why did she let me do that? Why did my other female friend who was there at the shoot say nothing?

Honestly, it was suppose to be a fun little fluff piece and you people are getting your knickers in a twist about it.

And until I see some of YOUR work, frankly neither of you has room to complain. Think my work is banal and sexist? Fine - put your money where your mouth is.

Comment from h3llc4t, breaker of office dress codes on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T02:38:56Z

@SexCpotatoes: It kind of looks like a fishing-net-with-no-net-of-fire.

Comment from h3llc4t, breaker of office dress codes on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T02:38:12Z

@PrettyPrettyPrincess: There is a photo in the same Flickr pool of a cute girl offering a bite of her food. I'd consider the girl sexually attractive, yet she's not shown with "mobile sucking mouth". I think you're looking for things to get offended by.

Comment from El_Fez on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T02:33:25Z

@Vivelafat is the Quizat Haderach:

I can say I don't like a piece of art and I don't have to post any of my own to validate my opinion.

You can not like my work. You don't have to be a dick about it.

Comment from PrettyPrettyPrincess on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T02:30:14Z

@Telekinesis123: In all seriousness, is there no happy medium of sexiness between BJ-mouth and a Narwhal? I think woman, men, all sorts of things are sexy..but the objection here was that the red mouth depiction has been done a few times, and maybe a 'sexy' photo that doesn't portray women as mobile sucking mouths would be an interesting change. While women ARE hot, it doesn't mean we should all just shut up, open our lips, and let ourselves be objectified.

Comment from PrettyPrettyPrincess on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T02:26:00Z

@corporatedrone: I was taking the sexism and overreaction of the editor seriously, not myself :) Not sure why you guys have your panties in a twist over a comment calling a photo unoriginal but I think it's amusing. Sweetie.

Comment from corporatedrone on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T02:18:51Z

@PrettyPrettyPrincess: I was referring to you, darling.

Comment from SexCpotatoes on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T02:17:31Z

I call foul on that cat shot. It's only a "ring of fire" if the flames go ALL the way around. The kitty is jumping through a hoop that the top part is merely burning, not the bottom where said kitty would be in any danger. 100% meh.

Comment from Ben Popken on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T02:12:14Z

@PrettyPrettyPrincess: Whearas at Consumerist we ban trolls and sockpoppets.

Comment from PrettyPrettyPrincess on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T02:06:54Z

@corporatedrone: Are you referring to yourself? She seemed to respond well to some of the feedback in the comments - much more rationally than the people posting them.

Comment from corporatedrone on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T02:03:10Z

@PrettyPrettyPrincess: Yes, Vivelafat came in here and made a very intelligent, very rational comment that was not ridiculous at all.
It's amazing to me how people can live their everyday lives while taking themselves so seriously.

Comment from PrettyPrettyPrincess on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T01:53:17Z

@Ben Popken: Yes, captain obvious, clearly this isn't Jezebel because at Jezebel it's the sexist asshole who gets banned. Consumerist is not the place to go for intelligent discourse - comments should be confined to 'ooh it's pretty' or 'me likey the kitty one'. The only mistake Vivelefat made was in forgetting that for a moment and trying to have an actual conversation about the artistic merit of the photo.

Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T01:51:47Z

@battra92: If you look carefully, the leaping kitty has six of them. Va-Va-VOOM!

Comment from Telekinesis123 on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T01:45:14Z

@Vivelafat is the Quizat Haderach:

What would you have, a Narwhal? Is that artsy and pretentious enough for you? Woman are naturally hot, deal with it.

Comment from Anonymous on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T01:44:32Z

@Ben Popken: Clearly it isn't Jezebel, because at Jez, it's the sexist asshole who gets banned. Hopefully you can figure out the subtext in what I am saying.

Comment from battra92 on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T01:31:20Z

No cleavage again? This is most disappointing.

Comment from h3llc4t, breaker of office dress codes on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T01:29:31Z

@Ben Popken: You win today, thank you.

Comment from opsomath on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T01:27:31Z

@codepage9: win.

Comment from Ben Popken on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T01:22:38Z

@Vivelafat is the Quizat Haderach: This ain't Jezebel, honey-cakes.

Comment from Vivelafat is the Quizat Haderach on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T01:08:39Z

@banmojo: Why?

Comment from Vivelafat is the Quizat Haderach on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T01:08:01Z

@codepage9: You are absolutly correct it could be a man and my own inherent prejudices led me to conclude that it was a woman. It happens to the best of them.
@TheStig'sNJCousin_GitEmSteveDave:You too are also correct. I didn't remember Valentine's Day (we don't celebrate it for the exact reason you mentioned)Although, I have a feeling it being so huge on the front page also had a little bit to do with the reprehensible idea that sex sells.

Comment from Belabras ate my dingo! on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T01:06:37Z

Cat hoop all the way. Go kitty go!

Comment from Vivelafat is the Quizat Haderach on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T01:05:15Z

@El_Fez: That's not how a critique of art works. I can say I don't like a piece of art and I don't have to post any of my own to validate my opinion. Art is about opinion, right? I'm sorry if I was offensive, I didn't couch my statement very well, but I do think that it is rather uninspired. Lust is a very broad topic and using a close up of a female mouth to portray that has been done many, many times in my humble opinion. In no way am I an expert. Also for the record (cue Feminazi bonnerkiller squad) I think it is rather sexist.
Now if it is a male mouth, that would be a decidedly more thought provoking.

Comment from Doug81 on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T00:56:09Z

Here's the cat guys website. I saw him when I was in Key West. In the off season of course.

Comment from TheStig'sNJCousin_GitEmSteveDave on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T00:44:25Z

@Vivelafat is the Quizat Haderach: Who said it's a woman? It could be Tim Curry.

That being said, the current incarnation of Valentines Day, with candy hearts being an accepted symbol of, is now mostly a "Hallmark" holiday whereupon men are separated from their money at the end of a gun wielded by gullible women who have been convinced that it's really "romantic" to do something nice b/c your "supposed" to. So that just symbolizes to me money exiting the wallets of people by very good marketing.

Comment from TheStig'sNJCousin_GitEmSteveDave on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T00:34:46Z

@TheDustball: Those are stray cats that the guy adopted off the street, then trains to perform. Agreed. I'm lucky mine move when the Roomba hits them.

Comment from RandomHookup on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T00:32:03Z

It's good to see that Sam Elliott has taken up cat training since he stopped making films.

Comment from banmojo on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T00:25:29Z

@codepage9: your comment made me throw up in my mouth a little bit. thanks :^)

Comment from Thanatos on 2009-02-20

2009-02-21T00:07:17Z

Loved Curbside Parking but had to vote for DSC_1320 a house cat jumping through a ring of fire? How often do you see that.

Comment from codepage9 on 2009-02-20

2009-02-20T23:59:05Z

@undefined:

What makes you think it was a woman? Can't a guy wear lipstick if he so desires?

Comment from El_Fez on 2009-02-20

2009-02-20T23:54:21Z

@Vivelafat is the Quizat Haderach:

Okay, smart guy - lets see *YOUR* brilliant photography. Put up or shut up.

Comment from El_Fez on 2009-02-20

2009-02-20T23:52:47Z

Wow, two weeks in a row as the main photo? I'm honored!

Comment from Michael Belisle on 2009-02-20

2009-02-20T23:50:10Z

Feline Agility Competition:

Comment from Vivelafat is the Quizat Haderach on 2009-02-20

2009-02-20T23:47:45Z

That first photo is uninspired and banal. A woman's mouth used to portray Lust? You don't say! However did they think of that. And what exactly does it have to do with consumerism? Oh wait....I forgot....nothing.

Comment from Canino on 2009-02-20

2009-02-20T23:31:06Z

@ekthesy: And why is Sam Elliott torturing that cat?

Comment from zentex on 2009-02-20

2009-02-20T23:29:26Z

Cat tricks (especially those that involve fire) beat anything presented today.

Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-02-20

2009-02-20T23:23:10Z

@TheDustball: The trick is, set the cat on fire.
(cough) So I've read. (cough)

Comment from Trai_Dep on 2009-02-20

2009-02-20T23:22:15Z

As a kid that grew up wearing black and smoking Gaulois, Curbside Parking moves me.

Comment from Rob Weddle on 2009-02-20

2009-02-20T23:12:25Z

I went and checked out the Flickr page of the artist of the Cat photo, and it was just as I suspected: Key West.

They just have their own lovable brand of crazy down there. Can't be beat.

Comment from ekthesy on 2009-02-20

2009-02-20T23:05:20Z

Why is Dr. Elliot Reid offering me some caviar?

Comment from TheDustball on 2009-02-20

2009-02-20T23:02:53Z

WTH is that cat one? I can't even get my cat to move her butt off the couch. That's pretty amazing.