<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T13:56:41Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for FDA Is Not Impressed By Diet Coke Plus</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5124677" title="FDA Is Not Impressed By Diet Coke Plus" />
    <published>2009-01-07T00:36:10Z</published>
    <updated>2009-01-07T00:38:23Z</updated>
    <title>FDA Is Not Impressed By Diet Coke Plus</title>
    <summary>--&gt;Last month, the FDA sent Coca-Cola a letter warning that their Diet Coke Plus (&quot;it&apos;s what plants crave&quot;) violates FDA standards for products fortified with vitamins.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Alex Chasick</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/31/2009/01/dietcokeforthewin.jpg" height="105" width="158" />-->Last month, the FDA sent Coca-Cola a <a href="http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/s7064c.htm">letter warning</a> that their Diet Coke Plus ("it's what plants crave") violates FDA standards for products fortified with vitamins.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>The FDA's letter takes issue with the word "plus," which has a standardized meaning and may only be used for certain fortified foods and beverages. Because "plus" is supposed to be used for comparison, e.g., "this Diet Coke Plus has more vitamins and minerals than this fifth of rye," and because Coca-Cola didn't identify a reference product, the "plus" is worthless. Further, the letter notes, "the FDA does not consider it appropriate to fortify snack foods such as carbonated beverages." But, it's got electrolytes!</p>
<p>(Photo: <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/myszka/2385069499/">La Mariposa</a>)</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:10071173</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c10071173" />
    <title>Comment from opsomath on 2009-01-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>opsomath</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9865485" rel="nofollow">Deleriumb32</a>:</p>
<p>Wow, for someone who makes such harsh comments on people, you think you'd at least know it's an H, not a C, that gets replaced -  which anyone who had had a semester of organic chemistry should be able to figure out.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-15T22:53:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9919651</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9919651" />
    <title>Comment from Charlotte Rae&apos;s Web on 2009-01-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Charlotte Rae&apos;s Web</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9856169" rel="nofollow">☠Grяrяrяrяrяrяrя.  All I ever wanted was a Chrysler Cordoba...</a>: You two and my crazy Mormon aunt!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-09T08:41:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9884349</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9884349" />
    <title>Comment from trujunglist on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>trujunglist</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Oh no, a warning letter about some anal retentive crap that doesn't matter at all! Let me guess how this one panned out:<br />
Coke and FDA have a chat over a fine lobster dinner and some chianti, then they go home and fuck. 5 weeks later, Coke is preggers, and the FDA's got some 'splainin' to do</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-08T04:41:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9869470</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9869470" />
    <title>Comment from zarex42 on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>zarex42</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The FDA is completely wrong in this case, and it's a clear abuse by the agency.</p>
<p>The Diet Coke+ is fortified with vitamins and nutrients, as clearly stated on the package.  OF COURSE it's compared to regular Diet Coke.</p>
<p>That the FDA doesn't consider it "appropriate" to fortify snack foods is silly, arbitrary, and baseless.</p>
<p>I hope Coke fights this and wins handily.  I expect they will.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T22:18:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9867779</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9867779" />
    <title>Comment from shepd on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>shepd</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9848644" rel="nofollow">KyleOrton</a>:</p>
<p>Considering that Coke is usually "acceptable" by religious sects that are against any and all consumption of alcohol, they would look down upon Coke offering their name up to any purveyor of alcoholic beverages.</p>
<p>Coke would rather supply JD with the coke and tell JD to keep it "secret".  ie:  Don't mark it on the bottle, but if someone happened to accidentally let it out on the internets, feh, what can be done?  :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T21:29:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9865485</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9865485" />
    <title>Comment from Deleriumb32 on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Deleriumb32</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847517" rel="nofollow">matt1978</a>: @<a href="#c9847517" rel="nofollow">matt1978</a>: @<a href="#c9863749" rel="nofollow">SadSam</a>:</p>
<p>Ugh!  Where do you people get your information.  Splenda is chlorinated sugar, which means they remove a C and replace it with a Cl.  Your body doesn't recognize it and it passes through.  Reading comments about food chemistry is such an exercise in frustration.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T20:05:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9863749</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9863749" />
    <title>Comment from SadSam on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>SadSam</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5124677/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus#c9863032" rel="nofollow">Allison Butz</a>:</p><br />
<p>And Splenda is chlorine, yuck! If I'm going to drink me some soda I'm going to be buying that black market Mexican Coke with real cane sugar. Yum!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T18:11:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9863641</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9863641" />
    <title>Comment from faintandfuzzies on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>faintandfuzzies</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5124677/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus#c9851353" rel="nofollow">Rectilinear Propagation</a>: You're so welcome. I glad I could set you straight!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T17:53:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9863032</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9863032" />
    <title>Comment from Allison Butz on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Allison Butz</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5124677/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus#c9851870" rel="nofollow">snowburnt</a>: It is hard to find, but they don't use Splenda as the only sweetener. It's Splenda in addition to aspartame...so it's pretty much a useless exercise.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T15:19:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9862508</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9862508" />
    <title>Comment from savdavid on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>savdavid</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>"Plants crave?". Let them buy it then.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T13:20:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9861630</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9861630" />
    <title>Comment from Alexander Saites on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alexander Saites</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9850813" rel="nofollow">EtoilePB</a>: You can still Diet Coke with Splenda. But you have to the cashier first, which may leave a bad taste in your mouth.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T11:17:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9859949</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9859949" />
    <title>Comment from Alex Chasick on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alex Chasick</name>
        <uri>http://jalexc.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jalexc.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9855199" rel="nofollow">kostia</a>: After watching Wall-E I had the immediate desire to go home and watch Idiocracy. They should be packaged as a box set.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T09:02:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9859138</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9859138" />
    <title>Comment from Quilt on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Quilt</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Back the fuck off, Mr. FDA.  I need my electrolytes!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T08:13:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9858734</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9858734" />
    <title>Comment from vastrightwing on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>vastrightwing</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I'd be happy if Coke just put the darn sugar back in Classic coke. Enough of the HFCS!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T07:50:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9858202</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9858202" />
    <title>Comment from Jonathan Fuentes on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jonathan Fuentes</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847535" rel="nofollow">JPropaganda</a>: "Go away, 'baitin."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T07:18:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9858199</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9858199" />
    <title>Comment from mbz32190 on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>mbz32190</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I only saw Diet Coke Plus for a month or two after it came out, then it vanished. I don't know about you, but if I WANT soda, vitamins and minerals aren't a high priority.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T07:18:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9858004</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9858004" />
    <title>Comment from rewind on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>rewind</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5124677/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus#c9847535" rel="nofollow">JPropaganda</a>: <br />My favorite is the "point to your symptom" and the picture of the baby dropping from between the legs. Classic</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T07:07:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9857761</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9857761" />
    <title>Comment from TheRealAbsurdist on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>TheRealAbsurdist</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847874" rel="nofollow">apronk</a>: Wait...  it's <i>not</i> plus bacon?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T06:53:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9857744</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9857744" />
    <title>Comment from TheRealAbsurdist on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>TheRealAbsurdist</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9848808" rel="nofollow">Hamtronix</a>: RIP, Viv...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T06:52:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9857066</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9857066" />
    <title>Comment from tackhouse1 on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>tackhouse1</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847591" rel="nofollow">BlondeGrlz is having a BlondeBoyz!</a>: couldn't agree more!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T06:15:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9856169</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9856169" />
    <title>Comment from Grrrrrrr, portrait of a chickenwolfmoosepig. on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Grrrrrrr, portrait of a chickenwolfmoosepig.</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847517" rel="nofollow">matt1978</a>: Wow, I thought I was the only one in the country that drank Tab.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T05:32:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9855941</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9855941" />
    <title>Comment from Darascon on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Darascon</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9848808" rel="nofollow">Hamtronix</a>: I like the side effects too:</p>
<p>"5 star raining blood on expert"<br />
"Grow beards made entirely of razor blades and ninjas"<br />
"win at everything you do, for life"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T05:20:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9855922</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9855922" />
    <title>Comment from Darascon on 2009-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Darascon</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9848878" rel="nofollow">Preyfar</a>: Touche my friend.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T05:19:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9855273</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9855273" />
    <title>Comment from SunnyLea on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>SunnyLea</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm bothered by Mountain Dew Code Red.</p>
<p>What does this "Code Red" mean? Is this some sort of emergency? Where is the code black? What about people with red/green colorblindness.</p>
<p>(Also, I don't think it is appropriate to eat with one's elbows on the table so take THAT FDA! I'm keepin' my eye on you.)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T04:47:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9855232</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9855232" />
    <title>Comment from Joe Crook on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joe Crook</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9848120" rel="nofollow">varro</a>, @<a href="#c9849356" rel="nofollow">Alex Chasick</a> and @<a href="#c9850792" rel="nofollow">MercuryPDX</a>: You can still get premixed Jack Daniel's and Coke in Australia; I bought some when I was there. Decent stuff, and it actually comes in sweet little 330ml/11oz (ish) bottles.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T04:44:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9855199</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9855199" />
    <title>Comment from kostia on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>kostia</name>
        <uri>http://www.slithytoves.org/~kostia</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.slithytoves.org/~kostia">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847535" rel="nofollow">JPropaganda</a>: Yup! I cracked up when I read that. Horrible movie all around, though. I wish I hadn't seen it before I watched Wall-E.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T04:43:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9854043</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9854043" />
    <title>Comment from teh on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>teh</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847535" rel="nofollow">JPropaganda</a>: Agreed! Consumerist made my day with that one.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T03:53:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9853767</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9853767" />
    <title>Comment from Spider Jerusalem on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Spider Jerusalem</name>
        <uri>http://blog.myspace.com/adrigon</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.myspace.com/adrigon">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847771" rel="nofollow">opsomath</a>: That's the comment I was looking for. Why the hell wouldn't they condiser it appropriate? If Kraft can pass off "Supermac", DC should be able to stick some vitamins in. At least the poor people who are addicted to DC could be getting *something* out of it besides brittle bones.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T03:44:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9853615</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9853615" />
    <title>Comment from courtarro on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>courtarro</name>
        <uri>http://www.hydrous.net/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hydrous.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847577" rel="nofollow">speedwell</a>: We love our Coke, but I'd rather drink refrigerator-flavored tap water than Diet Coke.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T03:38:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9852314</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9852314" />
    <title>Comment from happysquid on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>happysquid</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9848167" rel="nofollow">varro</a>: SURGE would give you powers beyond comprehension!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T02:59:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9851870</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9851870" />
    <title>Comment from snowburnt on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>snowburnt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9850101" rel="nofollow">Oranges w/ Cheese</a>: I've read that aspartame (the sweetner in most diet drinks) is a seriously misunderstood chemical...sure it tastes sweet, but it confuses your body into thinking it's about to get a sugar rush, so it prepares by doing the normal things.  When the sugar rush doesn't happen, you start to crave sweets.  I wouldn't be surprised if part of that was making you fatter too.</p>
<p>Also, since it messes with your mind, I found some websites where people were being treated for depression, cut diet coke out of their diet and coincidentally their depression ended too.</p>
<p>They came out with Diet coke with splenda, but I haven't seen it recently.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T02:47:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9851741</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9851741" />
    <title>Comment from TheKeg on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>TheKeg</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I wonder if those little wonder berries would help with the taste.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/caffeine/candy/ab3f/" rel="nofollow">[www.thinkgeek.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T02:44:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9851452</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9851452" />
    <title>Comment from Rectilinear Propagation on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rectilinear Propagation</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Personally, I'm just zazzed they used that photo for the article. I thought it was awesome when they included it in one of the Friday Flckr pool posts.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T02:36:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9851353</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9851353" />
    <title>Comment from Rectilinear Propagation on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rectilinear Propagation</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9849166" rel="nofollow">faintandfuzzies</a>: Well THANK G-D you said something!</p>
<p>I might have followed the link and gotten informed of something you already know about!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T02:34:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9850859</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9850859" />
    <title>Comment from WatchOutNow on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>WatchOutNow</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I feel really guilty when I crave and drink soda.  The carbonation, high levels of super cheap 'sugar' per serving, &amp; unnecessary caffine...well it's like Krak.</p>
<p>I only drink Coca-Cola if I want to drink soda, and won't drink any other variation of Coke or Pepsi...my last venture out there was Crystal Clear Pepsi..they should have kept that product.</p>
<p>It's all junk any way you look at it.  My fav is a supersized # 1 with a gallon of diet cola...YUM...talk about a nice balance of give &amp; take.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T02:20:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9850813</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9850813" />
    <title>Comment from Etoiles on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Etoiles</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847726" rel="nofollow">bigdirty</a>: Can you still Diet Coke with Splenda?  No store around here still carries it, and it's my guilty pleasure (I have negative reactions to Aspartame that are best summed up as "allergic" and mean that regular Diet Coke is a no-no).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T02:19:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9850792</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9850792" />
    <title>Comment from MercuryPDX on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>MercuryPDX</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/MercuryPDX</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/MercuryPDX">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9849356" rel="nofollow">Alex Chasick</a>: That was actually very tasty (JD Hard Cola)... aside from the fact it was a malt beverage.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T02:18:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9850648</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9850648" />
    <title>Comment from nobodyman on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>nobodyman</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Man, tough crowd for the DC+ I guess.  Personally I love the stuff.  I can't be the only one, right?  I mean it's not like I'm one of those freaks that pretended to like Pepsi Clear.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T02:14:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9850392</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9850392" />
    <title>Comment from Saboth on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Saboth</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm waiting for "Double Quarter Pounder Plus" from McDonalds.  2 all beef patties, 2 slices of cheese and a special sauce of Lipitor, Plavix and Zocor.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T02:07:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9850131</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9850131" />
    <title>Comment from Oranges w/ Cheese on the move on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Oranges w/ Cheese on the move</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Since when is the FDA against fortifying "snack foods" with vitamins?</p>
<p>What about all the junk food fortified with exorbitant amounts of VITAMIN C!!!!!!! *cough cough sunny d* so that Moms will see some benefit in buying it for their screaming speshuls?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T02:01:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9850101</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9850101" />
    <title>Comment from Oranges w/ Cheese on the move on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Oranges w/ Cheese on the move</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847698" rel="nofollow">snowburnt</a>: If you can palate it, the B vitamins might do.. something.</p>
<p>I tried a can of the stuff and it was serious crap.</p>
<p>I've heard that Diet Coke actually has an ingredient in it that makes you retain body fat... Yay!<br />
And considering the stuff shines up pennies, we really shouldn't be drinking it in the first place.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:59:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9849919</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9849919" />
    <title>Comment from failurate on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>failurate</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9848601" rel="nofollow">copious28</a>: Ouch! My kidneys!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:54:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9849794</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9849794" />
    <title>Comment from geeky_reader on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>geeky_reader</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9848805" rel="nofollow">Mary</a>: Saucer of milk, table for two reow!</p>
<p>My fault. You people at the FDA are just too picky about the wording of "Plus."   ;)</p>
<p>Perhaps Coke can choose a synonym if those aren't regulated, Diet Coke Augmented? Diet Coke And More? Diet Coke and Extra Stuff? Diet Coke Woot?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:51:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9849791</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9849791" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The whole point of the PLUS is to Plus-back all the nutrients the chemical sweetener toxins minus from your body while the drink poisons you.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:50:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9849585</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9849585" />
    <title>Comment from Murph1908 on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Murph1908</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>1.  Isn't the reference obvious?  Diet Coke.  Didn't even think that was in question.</p>
<p>2.  Doesn't consider fortifying snack foods, but fortifying (nearly) sugar based cereals is ok?  Cookie Crisp, anyone?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:44:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9849356</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9849356" />
    <title>Comment from Alex Chasick on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alex Chasick</name>
        <uri>http://jalexc.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jalexc.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9848120" rel="nofollow">varro</a>: Jack and Jim have already tried:<br />
<a href="http://www.jdcollectorspage.com/cola.html" rel="nofollow">[www.jdcollectorspage.com]</a><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jcolman/2342574663/in/set-72157604141999764/" rel="nofollow">[www.flickr.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:38:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9849226</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9849226" />
    <title>Comment from bobcatred on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>bobcatred</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Gee, I didn't know that the FDA was going into the trademark business. Who cares? Anyone stupid enough to believe that soda's healthy just because it's got some extra vitamins isn't going to suddenly understand if it becomes Diet Coke Extra or Diet Coke V or some nonsense like that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:34:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9849166</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9849166" />
    <title>Comment from faintandfuzzies on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>faintandfuzzies</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Old News</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:33:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9849049</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9849049" />
    <title>Comment from Julius Seizure - Canuck on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Julius Seizure - Canuck</name>
        <uri>http://gravsplaything.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gravsplaything.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847649" rel="nofollow">BlondeGrlz is having a BlondeBoyz!</a>: At first read, I thought you wrote "... like warm P*ss."</p>
<p>Though, I guess it's about the same thing, no?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:29:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848878</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848878" />
    <title>Comment from Preyfar on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Preyfar</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5124677/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus#c9847903" rel="nofollow">Darascon</a>: And Syke in turn stole their ads from Powerthirst. And BLANTANTLY stole their ads at that.</p><br />
<p>In fact, hell, that should be a Consumerist post in and of itself.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:24:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848854</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848854" />
    <title>Comment from oneliketadow on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>oneliketadow</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The FDA is worried about "plus" labeling and they can't keep melamine, lead, or GHB out of our food supply?  Get serious!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:24:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848808</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848808" />
    <title>Comment from Hamtronix on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Hamtronix</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847962" rel="nofollow">Darascon</a>: "wrestle Poodles, and win!" <br />
"Tease People"<br />
Shave your legs"<br />
"Look over walls."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:22:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848805</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848805" />
    <title>Comment from Mary on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mary</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847874" rel="nofollow">apronk</a>: that was not the only issue...perhaps reading the source would help.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:22:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848663</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848663" />
    <title>Comment from madanthony on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>madanthony</name>
        <uri>http://www.madanthony.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.madanthony.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847669" rel="nofollow">lostingenerica</a>:</p>
<p>And it hydrates!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:17:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848645</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848645" />
    <title>Comment from Phexerian on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phexerian</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It doesn't taste too bad to me.  I much prefer pepsi but drink this on occasion.  Plus has some added B vitamins which are supposed to help curve your energy levels through out the day.  However, I don't think it has enough B vitamins to actually do that.  When you take B vitamin complex supplements to help with dieting/weight loss/energy, it turns ones urine bright neon yellow.</p>
<p>I don't know what to make of the FDA's statement.  Usually they are pro big business.  This certainly isn't pro big business on the outside looking in.  I can only assume there is some other ulterior motive the FDA has in mind.</p>
<p>Perhaps the FDA sees Coke Plus as a step towards a different line of products EG something which may include cane sugar instead of corn syrup in the future and that would put a dent into their big business structure.  One can only guess....</p>
<p>-Phex<br />
-3rd Year PharmD/MBA Candidate</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:17:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848644</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848644" />
    <title>Comment from JayCutlerhurtsmyhead on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>JayCutlerhurtsmyhead</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9848391" rel="nofollow">Matthew Leibel</a>: Jack Daniels sells premixed drinks like that, including a Jack and cola.  I've seen others and the cola is always generic.  I think Coca Cola prefers to stay out of the liquor isle and the drink will never be a Jack and Pepsi or a rum and RC, so there's no need to.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:17:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848620</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848620" />
    <title>Comment from Katxyz on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Katxyz</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9848391" rel="nofollow">Matthew Leibel</a>:</p>
<p>Jack Daniels is now selling flavored alcoholic drinks, a la Mike's Hard, with Jack in them, including a "cola" flavor.  No idea how it tastes, but I'm suspicious of the whole deal considering they also had a "watermelon" flavor that sounds plain nasty.</p>
<p>What is the point of metallic flavored, fake healthy Diet Coke?  If you like the taste of Diet Coke, drink it and admit it's not that great for your teeth.  If you want vitamins, swallow a multi and don't mess with the flavor of a beverage you enjoy.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:16:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848601</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848601" />
    <title>Comment from copious28 on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>copious28</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I love how DC+ has been out for over a year and a half and the FDA is *just now* commenting on it.</p><br />
<p>What if it was truly harmful to people? Then that means that all those people that tried it while they were giving it away free (the only way people would drink it) would be hurt.</p><br />
<p>I think they should just put melamine in it. It might taste better...</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:15:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848599</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848599" />
    <title>Comment from plyhard13 on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>plyhard13</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Since they might have to stop making it, will the computer do the auto-layoff thingie?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:15:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848391</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848391" />
    <title>Comment from Matthew Leibel on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Leibel</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>You actually can buy a pre-mixed coke and rum drink in Mexico, though it is not branded as "Coca Cola" And yes, it is delicious.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:10:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848386</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848386" />
    <title>Comment from sebadoh128 on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>sebadoh128</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5124677/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus#c9847993" rel="nofollow">Ash78</a>:</p><br />
<p>True, but does diet Coke have,</p><br />
<p>"Hearts, Stars, and Horseshoes, Clovers, and Blue Moons, Pots of Gold and Rainbows, and me Red Balloons".</p><br />
<p>They could fortify that with shards of glass and I would still eat it.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:10:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848330</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848330" />
    <title>Comment from JohnDeere on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>JohnDeere</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>well because only an idiot wouldnt know they were comparing it to plain old diet coke.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:08:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848281</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848281" />
    <title>Comment from Rob Weddle on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rob Weddle</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Gee, FDA, thanks for your input.</p>
<p>Now that we got those pesky vitamins out of our junkfood, should we address anything else inappropriate going into our snacks?</p>
<p>No?  Everything else is fine?  Even all that shitty GMO corn that goes into regular Coke?  That doesn't need any kind of label or anything?  Okay then, if you say so.  See ya 'round.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:07:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848221</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848221" />
    <title>Comment from acknight on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>acknight</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847874" rel="nofollow">apronk</a>: Unless the FDA was having trouble with the many variations on Diet Coke that there are. Caffeine free, non-caffeine free... etc.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:05:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848179</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848179" />
    <title>Comment from krispykrink on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>krispykrink</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Maybe Jimmy Kimmel can explain to the FDA what the "plus" means. Last time I watched his show it was one long Coke commercial.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:04:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848167</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848167" />
    <title>Comment from varro on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>varro</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847830" rel="nofollow">half-beast</a>: If Diet Coke Plus is like that, then what would SURRRRRRRRGE Plus be?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:04:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848120</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848120" />
    <title>Comment from varro on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>varro</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847728" rel="nofollow">Segador</a>: If I wanted ethyl alcohol in my Coke, I'd add rum....and I'm surprised that the Coca-Cola Company hasn't contracted with some liquor company to make pre-mixed Rum and Cokes.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:03:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9848056</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9848056" />
    <title>Comment from Darascon on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Darascon</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5124677/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus#c9847993" rel="nofollow">Ash78</a>: I guess they're following suit after forcing sparks to change.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T01:01:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847993</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847993" />
    <title>Comment from Ash78 ain&apos;t got time to bleed on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ash78 ain&apos;t got time to bleed</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>As much as I'd like rail against soft drinks, it's a personal choice and the FDA is being kind of douchey about this.</p><br />
<p>To wit: There are breakfast cereals that are far worse than diet coke, but it's okay to fortify those with vitamins.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:59:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847990</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847990" />
    <title>Comment from Yan Grinshteyn on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Yan Grinshteyn</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>im not stupid enough to think that im getting my fish oils by drinking this so what idiot out there is replacing his centrum with soda now?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:59:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847964</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847964" />
    <title>Comment from humphrmi on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>humphrmi</name>
        <uri>http://famille.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://famille.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>Did anyone else notice that the letter was dated December 10, 2008?  Any word on a response from Coca-Cola? (yeah I already googled, aside from the news about this letter, nothing else comes up...)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:58:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847962</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847962" />
    <title>Comment from Darascon on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Darascon</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5124677/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus#c9847903" rel="nofollow">Darascon</a>: "gives you enough energy to kick a bear through a wall made entirely of tigers"</p><br />
<p>"kick chuck norris in the face over the phone"</p><br />
<p>"split an atom with your bare hands"</p><br />
<p>"cause heart attacks with the shear power of your awesomeness"</p><br />
<p>"burn holes in concrete with your sweat"</p><br />
<p>"win at fights against bears with lasers on their heads"</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:58:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847936</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847936" />
    <title>Comment from ScottRose on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>ScottRose</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847728" rel="nofollow">Segador</a>:  Blind drunk, maybe.  Ethyl is the good kind.  Rock on Purell drinkers, rock on..</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:57:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847919</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847919" />
    <title>Comment from 72Riv on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>72Riv</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>One of my all-time favorite movies. Not Sure. This one goes in your mouth... @<a href="#c9847535" rel="nofollow">JPropaganda</a>:</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:57:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847903</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847903" />
    <title>Comment from Darascon on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Darascon</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5124677/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus#c9847830" rel="nofollow">half-beast</a>: What, stealing ads from syke?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:56:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847874</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847874" />
    <title>Comment from geeky_reader on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>geeky_reader</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>I understand that vitamin-fortified soda ain't the best idea in this obese world.</p>
<p>However, what idiot would not be able to deduce that Diet Coke Plus = Diet Coke, plus [vitamins]?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:55:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847853</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847853" />
    <title>Comment from nicemarmot617 on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>nicemarmot617</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Ewwwwwwwww. How do they even come up with this crap?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:54:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847830</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847830" />
    <title>Comment from Half Beast on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Half Beast</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Diet Coke Plus.<br />It's like shaving your chest with a LAWNMOWER.<br />Diet Coke Plus.<br />It's like riding a pony, except the pony is 300 FEET TALL and COVERED IN CHAINSAWS.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:53:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847771</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847771" />
    <title>Comment from opsomath on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>opsomath</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>First, DC Plus is stupid, because anything with that quantity of artificial sweetener and phosphoric acid is bad for you regardless of added vitamins.</p>
<p>However, the plus obviously refers - obviously - to regular Diet Coke. And they have a rule for that? FFS!</p>
<p>Furthermore, does anyone else get the willies from "The FDA does not consider it appropriate to..."? Abuse of regulatory authority, anyone?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:52:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847761</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847761" />
    <title>Comment from FuryOfFirestorm on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>FuryOfFirestorm</name>
        <uri>http://www.myspace.com/furyoffirestorm</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.myspace.com/furyoffirestorm">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>"Coke Piss" is more like it!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:52:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847728</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847728" />
    <title>Comment from Segador on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Segador</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Just add some Purell to the Coke. You get 100% more aloe and ethyl alcohol. "Plus", you can go blind!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:51:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847726</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847726" />
    <title>Comment from bigdirty on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>bigdirty</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847517" rel="nofollow">matt1978</a>: Calling it gross is an understatement at best. It tastes weird and metallic, and the aftertaste is worse. One would be better off dropping a Flintstones Chewable in a can of regular Diet Coke, or Diet Coke sweetened with Splenda(R).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:51:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847698</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847698" />
    <title>Comment from snowburnt on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>snowburnt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Seems obvious to me, diet coke plus has more vitamins than diet coke, which according to the label it does...a bunch of B vitamins which claim to boost energy levels.</p>
<p>I doubt it does anything though...They'd be better off switching off of aspartame, I hear the stuff causes depression.</p>
<p>Also, I've tried it, tastes just like normal diet coke.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:50:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847669</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847669" />
    <title>Comment from lostingenerica on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>lostingenerica</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>But...It has electrolytes! It's what plants crave!<br />
lolz</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:49:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847649</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847649" />
    <title>Comment from BlondeGrlz on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>BlondeGrlz</name>
        <uri>http://bebehblog.wordpress.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://bebehblog.wordpress.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847517" rel="nofollow">matt1978</a>: Diet Coke is my own version of Dom Perignon. Diet Coke Plus is like warm Pimms.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:49:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847591</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847591" />
    <title>Comment from BlondeGrlz on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>BlondeGrlz</name>
        <uri>http://bebehblog.wordpress.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://bebehblog.wordpress.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9847535" rel="nofollow">JPropaganda</a>: Always a good day when Idiocracy is quoted.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:47:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847577</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847577" />
    <title>Comment from speedwell, avatar of snark on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>speedwell, avatar of snark</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>They'd better start getting used to people in Atlanta walking up to them telling them they're going to Hell for blasphemy. Coke is a food group around there.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:47:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847535</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847535" />
    <title>Comment from JPropaganda on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>JPropaganda</name>
        <uri>http://www.jasonpickar.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jasonpickar.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>"It's what plants crave" for the win, my friend. Idiocracy, indeed.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:46:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677-comment:9847517</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2009://1.5124677" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2009/01/fda-is-not-impressed-by-diet-coke-plus.html#c9847517" />
    <title>Comment from matt1978 on 2009-01-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>matt1978</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Boy, this stuff is gross. And I drink Tab, so that should tell you how low this is on the drinkability charts.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-07T00:45:40Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



