<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T14:14:08Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for FDIC Criticizes Banks&apos; Overdraft Fees</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5101707" title="FDIC Criticizes Banks' Overdraft Fees" />
    <published>2008-12-04T07:04:15Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-04T20:27:42Z</updated>
    <title>FDIC Criticizes Banks&apos; Overdraft Fees</title>
    <summary>--&gt;It took 18 months for the FDIC to figure out that banks&apos; practice of clearing checks largest to smallest makes banks a lot of money.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Ben Popken</name>
      <uri>http://www.consumerist.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term=" Be Frugal" />
    
    <category term=" Early Termination Fees" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/31/2008/12/mickeymousefees.jpg" width="158" height="140" />-->It took 18 months for the FDIC to figure out that banks' practice of clearing checks largest to smallest makes banks a lot of money.</p>
<p>Bankers defend it saying that people would rather their cable bill to bounce than their mortgage payment, but it just so happens that if you miscalculate your balance or a deposit didn't clear in time, it maximizes potential fees. Overdraft fees accounted for 74% of service fees banks earned in 2006, to the tune of $1.97 billion. The data was based on banks' responses to survey questions, so you can bet the numbers are actually higher.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2008-12-02-fdic-study-overdraft-fees_N.htm?POE=click-refer">FDIC: Bank overdraft fees hit young, low-income customers</a> [USAToday] <em>(Thanks to Snarkysnake!)</em> (Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidreber/3049879399/">David Reber</a>)</p>
]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9544898</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9544898" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248318" rel="nofollow">Roeroica</a>: 

<p>Down to the wire has nothing to do with it.  You must be rich and not understand what it is like to only have a finite amount of money.  When you are poor, you need to spend all of your money just to survive.  Unfortunately, jobs do not pay you in cash, they use either checks or direct deposit, essentially forcing people to put money into banks, whether they want to or not.  The entire system is designed to withhold as much cash from people as possible, so that banks can use those funds on investments.  That is why withdrawals are instantaneous, and all refunds or deposits often have attached dates or "holds" placed on them.  Deposits made after a certain time are registered as the next business day, while ATM or debit withdrawals are instantaneously withdrawn.  In addition, withdrawals are ordered (and in many cases re-ordered after-the-fact) to go from largest to smallest, maximizing bank overdraft profits, which in many cases exceed the fees or bills for which would be overdrawn.  The whole banking system is a massive scam dating back hundreds of years, designed to tax the poor and reward the wealthy.  The smartest thing in the world is to demand cash payment from your employer, engage in the barter system wherever possible, and never use banks at all.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-18T05:16:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9423710</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9423710" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-12</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>National City lost me business because of this. They process bigger transactions first, and often BEFORE deposits. 

<p>This resulted in me being hit with at $500 fine over Columbous day weekend 2 years ago.I spoke to 2 different branch managers, showed them my check register to proove that had they processed transactions and deposits in the order they occur, I wouldn't have overdrawn. No dice.</p>

<p>Now a happy member of Teachers' Credit Union in Indiana. Very good customer service</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-12T09:49:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9337416</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9337416" />
    <title>Comment from Voyou_Charmant on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Voyou_Charmant</name>
        <uri>http://www.myspace.com/65782</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.myspace.com/65782">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9270683" rel="nofollow">WendelCylla</a>:</p>
<p>You have an extra $500 laying around? And discipline?</p>
<p>I can't relate.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T05:33:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9337401</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9337401" />
    <title>Comment from Voyou_Charmant on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Voyou_Charmant</name>
        <uri>http://www.myspace.com/65782</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.myspace.com/65782">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9264859" rel="nofollow">kwsventures</a>: You're missing the point. It's not about over draft fees, it's about how your charges/purchases/checks are deducted from your account.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T05:33:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9312683</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9312683" />
    <title>Comment from savdavid on 2008-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>savdavid</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>When I was in college and up till a couple of years after Reagan got elected, I never paid ANYTHING on my checking account. Even if a check bounced, which happened twice, I didn't pay a thing. Bank used to make money on interest and loans. They still do but Fees are soooooooooooooooooo much more profitable and short term sighted. To hell with the long term reputation of their institution. Guess who pays the most fees? The middle class. The rich rarely pay anything. I know. I work for SunTrust banks.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-08T00:37:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9310266</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9310266" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If you are concerned about paychecks and items like that taking 3 days to be credited I have a solution that may help.  My wife and I bank with National City and when we opened our account they had absurd hold times on our checks, even payroll checks.

<p>Luckily however there are 2 National City branches in our town.  First we go to the sattelite branch and cash my paycheck (my employer is to cheap to offer direct deposit). There are no fees for this as I am a national city customer.  Then I take the cash to my main branch 3 minutes away and deposit the cash directly avoiding any wait times on clearing checks.</p>

<p>I have done this with personal checks written to me as well and it always works.  Once when I complained about the extended wait times on my check deposits I asked about doing this and they said I wasn't allowed to...  Well I have been doing it for over a year now without a problem.</p>

<p>If banks are allowed to manipulate the system to their benefit then I feel no remorse doing the same to my benefit.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-07T16:40:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9306555</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9306555" />
    <title>Comment from physics2010 on 2008-12-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>physics2010</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>This was brought up recently as affecting senior citizens the most because of their fixed income. Unfortunately once they were in the trap they just got buried with fees since they were already living near their means. Damn senior citizens with their ferrari's and 80" tvs. Oops forgot to mention their multi-hundred dollar monthly drug habits. Screw their blood pressure.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-07T05:00:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9299529</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9299529" />
    <title>Comment from lihtox on 2008-12-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>lihtox</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9272050" rel="nofollow">Subliminal0182</a>: Do you mean that this would allow people to get away with fraud etc, or do you mean that the banks would never allow it to happen?  I have no idea what you mean.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-06T09:33:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9294956</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9294956" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9254237" rel="nofollow">Jesse</a>: The Federal Reserve has the power to print money as they see fit. Look it up. They can create something from nothing and then print out a bill for it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-06T04:22:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9293995</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9293995" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9258399" rel="nofollow">QudamahFisher</a>: 
Seriously?  That's a ridiculous position to take.  For example:
8 AM:  $45 balance
9 AM:  $2 coffee
11 AM: $5 lunch
6 PM: $5 dinner
8 PM:  $46 purchase

<p>At 8 PM, I had $33 in my account and spent $46 and theoretically should owe $35+$13.   My bank on the other hand, reorders my purchases and I now owe $140+$13.  And if I don't catch it in time for the overdraft fees, they will charge me overdrafts for the overdrafts.  Why is this wrong?  Because my first 3 transactions were not overdrafts.  I had money in my account to cover them.  While the idea of charging $35 for overdrafts starting at $.01 is a whole other conversation with regard the the horrible way that banks treat their customers, the fact that they can reorder my transactions in a way which incorrectly makes it appear as if I spent money I didn't have 4 times rather than 1 times should be illegal. </p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-06T03:39:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9290212</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9290212" />
    <title>Comment from ameyer on 2008-12-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>ameyer</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9264859" rel="nofollow">kwsventures</a>:<br />
1) It's "write" not "right"<br />
2) Let's say you have $100 in your account, deposit $200 cash, and make a $25 debit card purchase, a $75 debit card purchase, and a $125 debit card purchase, all in that order, and your bank charges $35/overdraft.<br />
It "should" (if the banks were properly regulated and/or had ethics) clear in this way:<br />
$100+$200=300-$25=$275-$75=$200-$125=$75.<br />
If your bank is particularly unethical, it'll clear in this way:<br />
$100-$125=($25)-$35 fee=($60)-$75=($135)-$35 fee=($170)-$25=($195)-$35 fee=($225)+$200=($30)<br />
If your bank was especially unethical, they'd hit you with an extended overdraft fee every few days until they racked up thousands of dollars of BS fees and then decided to absolutely destroy your credit and send their goons after you.<br />
3) What about fraud emptying out your account and causing overdrafts?</p>
<p>I'm thinking it's time for a RICO prosecution of some of these banks.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-06T01:34:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9283525</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9283525" />
    <title>Comment from SynMonger on 2008-12-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>SynMonger</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248790" rel="nofollow">oneswellfoop</a>: Good luck getting work as a lawyer. Big glut in that field, all the ones losing jobs are ahead of you. ;)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-05T22:10:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9276808</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9276808" />
    <title>Comment from chocolate1234 on 2008-12-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>chocolate1234</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Actually, debit transactions aren't usually posted to your account immediately. It all depends on the merchant, not the bank. Some post within a few hours, but many don't come through for a day or two. Often the amount will be taken from your available balance immediately (so essentially it hasn't even hit your account yet, but the merchant already notified the bank that the amount of money will be coming out of the account), but won't actually post to your account for a couple days, depending on when the merchant puts it through. The lag on returns posting to your account also has to do with the merchant and not the bank.</p>
<p>@<a href="#c9253997" rel="nofollow">CLEADD</a>:</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-05T11:15:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9275643</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9275643" />
    <title>Comment from arl84 on 2008-12-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>arl84</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5101707/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees#c9254372" rel="nofollow">BeThisWay</a>: What I'd like to see is banks "forgive", say, one incident every other year for those who truly make an accounting mistake.</p><br />
<p>They do.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-05T09:16:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9275629</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9275629" />
    <title>Comment from arl84 on 2008-12-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>arl84</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5101707/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees#c9249288" rel="nofollow">Tsubasa</a>: The bank will refund your fees in the event of fraud. If they don't, you're not asking.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-05T09:15:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9275604</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9275604" />
    <title>Comment from Fist-o™ on 2008-12-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Fist-o™</name>
        <uri>http://www.he-man.org/cartoon/cmotu-pop/universe/fisto.shtml</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.he-man.org/cartoon/cmotu-pop/universe/fisto.shtml">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248318" rel="nofollow">Roeroica</a>: OMG! You're so *smart*!</p>
<p>Perhaps we oughta put you on world hunger, too! Then, perhaps, faster than light travel?</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-05T09:13:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9275492</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9275492" />
    <title>Comment from squishyalt on 2008-12-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>squishyalt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9252754" rel="nofollow">ckaught78</a>: Admittedly I am no financial wizard.  But, a debit card should simply refuse a transaction when there is no money in the bank.</p>
<p>Financial wizard or no, even I can see that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-05T09:05:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9275037</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9275037" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9251601" rel="nofollow">chrisjames</a>: 

<p>Let me just say that as a bank manager it would be nice if all consumer's shared your view. Even though I work for the bank, I don't agree with how they charge fees, its absolutely ridiculous that they clear items highest to lowest in order to charge $33 fees on all of your $1.58 transactions that post monday after the weekend. Believe me, i have to try and explain it to customers 10 times a day. That being said, the internet banking age has completely changed the way customers perceive banking, they think they can swipe their debit card and wait three days to make a deposit to cover it, because it hasn't "posted". Bottom line is you spent the money and you didnt have it. I could go on like this for hours, but what I always say to customers is "show me your register that shows you recorded your transactions when you did them and you always had a positive balance". Ledger is the key! If your ledger is accurate and you never go negative in your ledger, your bank account won't go negative, that is of course if you know your banks funds availability policies of check deposits. I'm sick of hearing, I went to the ATM and it said my balance was $100. Well yes but you seem to have forgotten about that $99 check you wrote. While fees are certainly exorbitant, and overdraft "protection" and "coverage" can be very misleading to uneducated customers, if you kept a ledger which only takes simple addition and subtraction, you wouldn't have to worry about it. <br />
</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-05T08:35:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9272050</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9272050" />
    <title>Comment from Subliminal0182 on 2008-12-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Subliminal0182</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9251134" rel="nofollow">lihtox</a>: I can't even begin to explain the repercussions if this were to happen. It just wouldn't work.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-05T05:29:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9271536</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9271536" />
    <title>Comment from Subliminal0182 on 2008-12-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Subliminal0182</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9269932" rel="nofollow">HiEllie</a>: +1</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-05T05:01:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9271513</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9271513" />
    <title>Comment from Subliminal0182 on 2008-12-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Subliminal0182</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9250713" rel="nofollow">ShaktiSkylark</a>: "You make a deposit at an ATM at 2:30 AM? You get the first 1000$ credited instantly. "</p>
<p>What about empty envelopes? Assuming envelopes are collected in the morning like the bank I work for does, I could make five deposits into the ATM, empty envelopes, be credit $5000, and have spent it, all before the deposit(s) being discovered by the morning ATM teller and my acct/debit card put on D-block. At least, that's what happened at a few branches for the bank I work at.f</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-05T05:00:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9271339</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9271339" />
    <title>Comment from Subliminal0182 on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Subliminal0182</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9249428" rel="nofollow">glater</a>: BB&amp;T orders deposits then withdrawals, but it depends on timing. They order it so you use the money you actually have. It's called RAB (Redefining Available Balance, rolled out earlier this year). Deposit money then spend some, you'll get the deposit first. Basically if you made a purchase and then made a deposit later to cover your ass, you'd get a fee.</p>
<p>Cash is always immediate before 2pm. IE you deposit cash before 2pm and use some of it, the deposit will go in first. With checks you get the first $100 available immediately and the rest at midnight.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-05T04:53:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9270683</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9270683" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>1) Keeping a cushion of cash in your checking account can prevent many of these problems. The balance you consider "zero" should not actually be $0. The cushion amount depends on your expenditures; perhaps keep enough cash to cover your largest monthly bill. If you have any savings at all, you can accomplish this by moving it to your checking account. A $500 checking cushion that prevents a $35 overdraft fee is much better than $500 earning 1% interest in another account.

<p>2) Bank at a credit union. I had similar experiences to those listed here when I banked with large regional/national chains; since switching to a credit union I have not had a single bad experience in 5 years.</p>

<p>3) It's a personal choice of course, and not right for everyone, but consider putting all bill payments and expenses on a credit card and paying it off at the end of the month. As long as you are disciplined and don't exceed your credit limit, this can eliminate virtually all problems with banking out of your checking account. Also you can get greater purchase protection.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-05T04:26:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9269932</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9269932" />
    <title>Comment from HiEllie on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>HiEllie</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5101707/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees#c9250794" rel="nofollow">RivaPhaethon</a>: You floated a check. Always a gamble. End of story.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-05T03:56:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9264859</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9264859" />
    <title>Comment from kwsventures on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>kwsventures</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Don't right checks that you can't cover. Therefore, you will not pay any overdraft fees. Boom. Done.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-05T01:16:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9264745</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9264745" />
    <title>Comment from synergy on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>synergy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>"Bankers defend it saying that people would rather their cable bill to bounce than their mortgage payment"</p><br />
<p>Funny. I don't remember ever being asked my opinion on this. They also never asked before applying "courtesy overdraft."</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-05T01:13:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9263439</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9263439" />
    <title>Comment from UnnBabble on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>UnnBabble</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9256569" rel="nofollow">villaged</a>: It doesn't matter when your deposit went in--it technically isn't available until after midnight, even though the deposit went in before the change of business days at 2:00PM.  At least, that is what BB&T told me...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-05T00:36:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9261110</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9261110" />
    <title>Comment from SadSam on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>SadSam</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I'm going to suggest that much of the increase in bouncing check fees is related to Check 21 (law passed in 2003) because now checks no longer need to be sent from bank to bank there is no longer any "float" time. But while Check 21 did away with "float" for debits the banks are still entitled to hold deposits for an extended period of time.</p><br />
<p>If banks can process debits immediately they also can process deposits immediately they just don't want to.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T23:26:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9260994</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9260994" />
    <title>Comment from AustinTXProgrammer on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>AustinTXProgrammer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9250713" rel="nofollow">ShaktiSkylark</a>: <br />
Should we reward people for not keeping track of their expenses? Of course not, but how much do we need to punish those who don't?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T23:23:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9260932</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9260932" />
    <title>Comment from MerylBurbank on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>MerylBurbank</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9251134" rel="nofollow">lihtox</a>: That's a really good, fair idea.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T23:21:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9259689</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9259689" />
    <title>Comment from Voyou_Charmant on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Voyou_Charmant</name>
        <uri>http://www.myspace.com/65782</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.myspace.com/65782">
        <![CDATA[<p><i>Bankers defend it saying that people would rather their cable bill to bounce than their mortgage payment...</i></p>
<p>This is defense is flatly dishonest. They clear all of if anyway. It doesn't matter if it's $400 or $1.00, regardless of how overdrawn you end up.</p>
<p>If you have $401.00 and you then, in 4 transactions, over draft:</p>
<p>9:00 AM -- Debt Card -- $2.00<br />
1:00 PM -- Debt Card -- $3.00<br />
4:00 PM -- Debt Card -- $5.00<br />
6:00 PM -- Debt Card -- $398.00</p>
<p>Assuming they all clear the same day it shows up as:<br />
<b><i>[Note: My BOA online shows me oldest at the bottom, newest/pending at the top]</i></b></p>
<p>Balance: -$111.00</p>
<p>Debt Card - $2.00 - ($35.00 Overdraft) Balance -$111.00<br />
Debt Card - $3.00 - ($35.00 Overdraft) Balance -$74.00  <br />
Debt Card - $5.00 - ($35.00 Overdraft) Balance -$36.00 <br />
Debt Card - $398.00 - Balance $4.00</p>
<p>Available Balance: $402.00</p>
<p>What was only $6.00 over resulted in $105.00 in over draft fees thanks to their high to low policy.</p>
<p>They clear all of them, regardless of amount. Now, yes, I clearly spent more than I had available, and a fee for that is not unreasonable, but I only actually did that at $6:00PM -- in one transaction; not 3.</p>
<p>It is pretty clear that they just stack it from high to low to maximize the overdraft fees, since their whole argument is based on the implication that smaller transactions would be denied, but they aren't so they are filthy dishonest jerks. Or something.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T22:42:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9259222</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9259222" />
    <title>Comment from ameyer on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>ameyer</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9249582" rel="nofollow">katylostherart</a>: Until the bank decides to randomly hold a cash deposit that you make to be able to pay the rent out of your interest-bearing checking account at that bank for longer than banking regulations allow.</p>
<p>Fifth-Third did that to my mom recently.  Fortunately, the earliest her landlord's ever deposited the rent check is about the 5th of the month.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T22:26:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9258598</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9258598" />
    <title>Comment from Tiber on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tiber</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9254372" rel="nofollow">BeThisWay</a>: It's those one or two exceptions that we're talking about. When those couple of mistakes lead to an already ridiculous overdraft charge, and then they play around with the transaction order to make you pay that fee five times instead of once, that's when it gets maddening. And odds are that a certain number of people will make that mistake.</p>
<p>We're not shooting her for pointing out an obvious <i>preventative measure</i>, we're shooting her for pointing out an <i>obvious</i> preventative measure. She's stating the obvious, and ignoring the fact that this usually happens as an accident. Sounding like a troll doesn't help either. Preventative measures merely reduce the chance of having accidents, or lessen their impact; they don't eliminate them. Even then, such measures may not be possible.</p>
<p>Considering these ridiculous fees are done for the customer's "convenience", do you really want to see what their idea of "forgiveness" is?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T22:07:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9258399</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9258399" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Alright, yes, banks re-order transactions and charge overdraft fees.  EVERY bank I have ever used (many) re-orders transactions (only credit unions don't seem to).

<p>However, regardless of what order your transactions show up, if you keep an ACCURATE ledger/register of your account, you simply should never overdraft (assuming your ledger doesn't have negative balances in it).</p>

<p>I have heard in the past that some banks, such as Wachovia, will charge an O/D fee if you "available" balance drops below zero, which is sneaky and dishonest.  However, B of A (I know, I use them) only charges if the "actual" balance (ledger) turns red.  And they DO let you know if they hold a deposit.  Direct deposits always clear the same day they are posted, despite showing as pending through the end of the business day.  And, within the re-ordering of transactions, deposits ALWAYS post before any withdrawals/charges.</p>

<p>Yes, banks do have practices that make them more money on overdraft fees.  However, the only people these apply to are people who would overdraft ANYWAYS.  They don't hold deposits two days longer knowing your check will clear the day before.</p>

<p>Simply put, enough excuses.  Keep records, don't overdraft.  It's quite simple.</p>

<p>Disclaimer:  I used to be a compulsive "overdrafter," beginning when I had an old-school Washington Mutual free checking account back in college.  The fees were only $21, but I did it frequently, and finally learned how to avoid it.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T22:01:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9258307</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9258307" />
    <title>Comment from sixseeds on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>sixseeds</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9254541" rel="nofollow">RodolfoRabulous</a>: But if you already know your bank does this (and I believe it's common practice, maybe fraud protection?) you can plan accordingly.</p>
<p>chrisjames is right:  follow the ledger.  Treat any checks/withdrawal funds as gone the day you write the check.  Assume deposits will take 3 business days to clear.  If there's not enough money to cover all the checks you need to write, choose between the bill's late fee or the bank's overdraft, because you'll probably wind up paying one.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T21:58:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9258186</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9258186" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>National City has raked me over the coals so many times with this before. I was living paycheck to paycheck, and at the time had no way out. There was a couple times that I got whacked with over 100 dollars in fees in one day.

<p>This isn't completely relevant to the topic, but I had one really terrible experience with National City. I was just barely overdraft on my checking account. Fortunately, it was a pay day. So I take the check to the bank and deposit it. One week goes by, and I continue using my debit card. The next Friday, I took my paycheck in to deposit it, then ask for my balance, and I was close to 500 dollars overdraft, after my deposit!Come to find out, the previous Friday the bank's network was down, and somehow that translates to my paycheck getting deposited to someone elses account. There was over 400 dollars in fees! The bank refused to reverse all of the fees, told me that if I closed my account and didn't pay the negative balance then they would sell off the debt to a collections agency. So at that point in time, I had deposited my check, and was still overdraft... I hadn't a pennie to my name. I had to plead with the manager to get 100 dollars of my deposit, so I could eat. It was embaressing and degrading. As soon as I could afford to, I dumped my account with them, and I will never, ever look back.</p>

<p>Love my Chase bank though!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T21:55:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9258179</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9258179" />
    <title>Comment from reefer on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>reefer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9251134" rel="nofollow">lihtox</a>: I love that idea.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T21:54:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9257990</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9257990" />
    <title>Comment from darkryd on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>darkryd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>1.97 Billion is chump change to banks when $700 billion is being shelled out by Washington.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T21:49:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9257845</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9257845" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I had a long conversation with my bank and convinced them to remove the "convenience" feature. It was clear that the bank's reordering of transactions was designed to maximize their fees, so I had them remove that feature from my account. If I mess up the math or the timing on a transaction, at least it won't be compounded by the bank's creative definition of "convenience." </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T21:44:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9257628</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9257628" />
    <title>Comment from kryrinn on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>kryrinn</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have a checking, savings, and credit card with USAA.  Somehow, I can set up overdraft protection for my checking on my credit card, but not my savings account.  And it's been like that for years... so I don't have overdraft protection, because I'd rack up more fees on the credit card than in overdraft fees.</p>
<p>And BoA?  They screwed me over and claimed I owed them $250 in fees, for transferring all of my money out to close their account.  Apparently, that caused a fee which bounced which caused another fee which bounced...</p>
<p>There was a big mess with fees in England, where they can't be more than actual bank cost - which caused massive changes in bank procedures, and a lot less money for them!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T21:38:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9256702</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9256702" />
    <title>Comment from isadora on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>isadora</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>This goes well beyond paying overdrafts. Banks have bizarre rules! While I was in college I was also paying off a small car loan. I went in on a Friday to make a loan payment that wasn't technically due until that Sunday. I knew Monday would be too late. A couple of weeks later I get notice that I owed a late fee from my last payment!</p><br />
<p>The bank told me that in "bank time" I had made my payment on Monday--because anything after 2:30 is posted the following business day.</p><br />
<p>I'm not sure how I was supposed to know "bank time" but they refused to take the fee off. And because I didn't pay the late fee until the next payment due date, I had a 30-day late payment on my credit report! I did argue that off, thankfully.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T21:08:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9256569</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9256569" />
    <title>Comment from villaged on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>villaged</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9249428" rel="nofollow">glater</a>: BB&amp;T does this.  What was worse for me was that the deposits went in at 10AM and the VISA Checkcard transaction happened after 5PM.</p>
<p>BB&amp;T charged me nearly 200 dollars in ISF charges.  I changed banks.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T21:05:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9255699</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9255699" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9250001" rel="nofollow">Kekaha</a>: Um, No.

<p>The FDIC requires that a single bank treats ALL (Biz & Pers.) accounts the same when it comes to processing, they can't be selective.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T20:36:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9255257</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9255257" />
    <title>Comment from Dilbitz on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dilbitz</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I have Chase and they are OH so generous about taking my money from me. I live paycheck to paycheck, everything gets paid, but then there's nothing left for emergencies or any sort of entertainment. I get my paycheck direct deposited.</p><br />
<p>Let's say $600 was deposited in the morning. Then I pay all the bills ($250), go to Walmart ($100.25), get gas ($50) and go to the grocery store ($200.12). But then right away I notice that if all the checks clear right away, I would go over 37 cents, but no checks have gone through the bank yet. So I scramble for the change in the car and deposit 50 cents on my way home. This was all during the day, before 5pm. So now I should be 13 cents ahead, right?</p><br />
<p>Lo and Behold, a couple of days later it's all scrambled from what I spent, so now I'm overdrafted A LOT and they are tacking on fees because the overdraft has overdrafted me even more. I had a total of 10 overdrafts in one day! I would deposit some money when I got paid again and it would go all to them. Just for 37 cents! So basically I am a grunt of Chase Bank and I have had to work just to pay them.</p><br />
<p>I am going to open a credit union account and see if I can keep all my money from now on.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T20:20:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9255142</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9255142" />
    <title>Comment from Wormfather is Wormfather on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Wormfather is Wormfather</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5101707/fdic-critizes-banks-overdraft-fees#c9252375" rel="nofollow">squishyalt</a>: I've always called them bank of opportunists but I think you're 1 upped me</p><br />
<p><b>Bastards of America, Bank of Opportunists</b></p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T20:15:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9255140</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9255140" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If you clear checks from smallest to largest, a lot of rent checks would bounce. Important checks are usually larger and go through first. The problem here are the people who write worthless checks. Would you expect a bank to pay your bills for you? That's what it sounds like. If you don't have the money, don't write a check.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T20:15:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9255025</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9255025" />
    <title>Comment from mindshadow on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>mindshadow</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I sometimes wonder if the banks count on people saying "Well you should balance your checkbook!" as if to imply fiscal irresponsibility to silence people who cry foul about overdraft fees and re-ordering your transactions.  Yes, we all should be fiscally responsible, but some people just aren't good at that kind of thing.  Someone that grew up with parents who were good at balancing and budgeting and all that jazz will probably be more likely to spend the time balancing and budgeting themselves.  Also some people just straight-up aren't good at math, even if it is addition and subtraction.</p>
<p>Let's not forget the hard times we're in.  There are things that just aren't in your power that can put you in dire financial straights.  What if your family only has one car and something went wrong with it that you were unable to fix?  That could easily cost you several hundred to several thousand dollars.  Hell, just a trip to the ER costs me nearly three-hundred dollars (with insurance) if I go during hours that a regular doctors office is open.  That's several bills that could have been paid right there.  Point being it's easy to point fingers when you yourself are living well, but don't assume that people are overdrafting just because they're not trying to balance their checkbooks or they're too lazy/stupid/whatever to get a better paying job.</p>
<p>Also it's pretty ridiculous that they say they clear the biggest check first to make sure it goes through.  How is that convenient?  If you're going to pay all or most of them anyways, why not bounce/overdraft one large payment instead of several smaller ones?  The answer is because each one of those smaller ones makes the bank $35 profit which can easily add up to several hundred dollars.</p>
<p>I used to drink with a guy that was pretty high up in a larger bank in our area.  He was pretty heavily against overdraft fees and named them "bankers crack."</p>
<p>"The bank managers love your overdraft fees.  That's what lets them buy that really nice premium cocaine that you can't afford," he said.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T20:10:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254960</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254960" />
    <title>Comment from crashfrog on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>crashfrog</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9251601" rel="nofollow">chrisjames</a>: <i>Ledgers work and are always more accurate than the bank's balance.</i></p>
<p>Maybe, but so what? If there's a discrepancy you think the bank is going to trust your pen and paper ledger over their own information?</p>
<p>How can they? You, after all, deducted debts in the order they were made, not in the order most advantageous to the bank. As a result your ledger is automatically less accurate than the bank.</p>
<p><i>you can't ever make an argument against keeping your own record of how much money you put in and take out of the bank.</i></p>
<p>I can make a pretty good argument against the stated position above, which is that "keeping a ledger" is somehow a magic panacea against running up absurd fees.</p>
<p>It's not. The <i>whole point</i> of the fees is that they're nominally "punitive" measures for situations the bank puts you into without your notice. The fees exist to punish normal bank use.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T20:07:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254814</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254814" />
    <title>Comment from Phillip M. Vector on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phillip M. Vector</name>
        <uri>http://www.mostdeadlygame.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mostdeadlygame.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9254467" rel="nofollow">qcgallus</a>: I've done some research for a local CU in my area. I asked them, "If I do not have enough in my account to make the charge, do you authorize it?" They said no. I then asked, "What is your order of processing?" They said deposits, then withdraws lowest to highest.</p>
<p>I'm in the process now of getting an account and leaving US Bank.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T20:01:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254695</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254695" />
    <title>Comment from Evil_Otto on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Evil_Otto</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9251603" rel="nofollow">RileyPrometheus</a>: Most checking accounts in the US don't generate any interest at all.  Hell, my bank's "savings" accounts only pay 0.25% (that's correct, a quarter of one percent) in interest.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:55:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254600</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254600" />
    <title>Comment from bobloblawsblog on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>bobloblawsblog</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9251601" rel="nofollow">chrisjames</a>: @<a href="#c9249235" rel="nofollow">shockwaver</a>: EXACTLY. these days, gas stations are still putting holds for more than your purchase amount on your cc, and *HELLO* does no one share an account with a spouse? do you come home every night and reconcile your checkbooks before starting dinner, putting kids to bed, or going to your second job?</p>
<p>CHASE, the WORST of all banks, likes to charge me a fee on my *free * checking account, then $35 for being overdrawn, then reversing the $9 fee that shouldn't have been there in the first place, which then causes my other transactions to be off, until i have to call every damned month to explain that they *KNOW* i have free checking so stop *ucking up my account. *as*holes.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:52:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254572</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254572" />
    <title>Comment from TCTH on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>TCTH</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9251549" rel="nofollow">alphafemale</a>: .giggle.???<br />
Was something funny?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:50:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254546</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254546" />
    <title>Comment from TCTH on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>TCTH</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9252710" rel="nofollow">muchenik</a>: Same thing for me with BofA's online bill pay program.  I would authorize the payments on the third of the month when I got paid (auto deposit) and they wouldn't be paid for some random amount of time, usually three days but up to as much as a week.</p>
<p>Try getting them to tell you why they can post an ATM debit against your account in as little as 5 minutes but can't post a deposit for 24 hours ar an online payment for three days.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:49:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254541</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254541" />
    <title>Comment from RodolfoRabulous on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>RodolfoRabulous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9251417" rel="nofollow">chrisjames</a>: The ledger does you no good when you make deposits that the bank decides to hold for some stupid reason like it's from an out of state bank.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:49:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254467</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254467" />
    <title>Comment from qcgallus on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>qcgallus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If I may pose a question, how many credit unions are the same? After I quit Wells Fargo (both as employee and as a bank) I went to a credit union. This hasn't happened there, and won't, but it did at WF and I got hit with $35/charge every damn time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:45:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254460</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254460" />
    <title>Comment from BeThisWay on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>BeThisWay</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9251601" rel="nofollow">chrisjames</a>:</p>
<p>Aha!  Common sense in the comments.</p>
<p>Very well said.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:45:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254438</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254438" />
    <title>Comment from TCTH on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>TCTH</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248979" rel="nofollow">RevMorose</a>: So that excuses the very real scam that the banks pull on people who hit a glitch in their meticulous bookkeeping?  There IS no excuse for largest to smallest and compounding fees and the other shady practices banks use to extract every nickel they possibly can from their customers.</p>
<p>If you people were satisfied with a REASONABLE profit and your institutional shareholders were satisfied with a REASONABLE return on investments, maintaining a balanced checkbook might not require the services of a CPA or an advanced degree in mathematics.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:44:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254384</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254384" />
    <title>Comment from qcgallus on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>qcgallus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9253011" rel="nofollow">corinthos</a>: See, and my thing about situations like that (because they happen!) is what if something had happened, like you ran out of gas on the freeway (saw it this morning so dont say it doesnt happen)? You wouldnt be able to get any, because your account is frozen, and would be stuck wherever the car rolled you to.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:42:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254372</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254372" />
    <title>Comment from BeThisWay on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>BeThisWay</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248318" rel="nofollow">Roeroica</a>:</p>
<p>Hey, everyone stop piling on Roerica.  He/she's right.  I've had minimum wage jobs before and still managed to live within my means and pay my bills on time, with one or two exceptions over the past 20 years.  And if I've forgotten and had to pay a late charge, well, that was my fault.</p>
<p>I do think the banks' fees are usurious, but don't  shoot Roerioca for pointing out an obvious preventative measure.  I also don't care how high the interest rates are on my credit cards because I pay them off every month, and I have an emergency fund for, well, emergencies.</p>
<p>If you don't bounce checks you don't get fees.</p>
<p>What I'd like to see is banks "forgive", say, one incident every other year for those who truly make an accounting mistake.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:42:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254258</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254258" />
    <title>Comment from tkozikow on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>tkozikow</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>My daughter is pretty responsible, but there was some miscommunication between her and wife about a piece of furniture that my wife purchased on behalf of my daughter with her check.  My daughter also buys music on iTunes at $0.99 per song.  Well, her balance after the large purchase was $3-4 until her paycheck came in a few days later.(we usually didn't monitor her account since it never had large purchases and the balance was decent).</p>
<p>You can probably guess what happened next...12 overdraft fees at $35 each for iTunes purchases since she used her debit card.  The killer was that it took several days for the overdraft notices to show up in the mail.  When my daughter checked her balance online everything looked reasonable since she had her paycheck and Suntrust was unwilling to reconsider ANY of the charges.  We now use a local bank which will actually CALL you if you have a negative balance before hitting you with fees.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:37:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254256</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254256" />
    <title>Comment from Wormfather is Wormfather on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Wormfather is Wormfather</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5101707/fdic-critizes-banks-overdraft-fees#c9251339" rel="nofollow">Phillip M. Vector</a>: I see your four fees and raise you to seven.</p><br />
<p>Bank of Opportunists pulled some gangsta shit on my account a couple of weeks ago, over the weekend I took money out of the account from 2 seperate non BoA ATMs and made a couple of small purchases. Monday some other stuff hit my account.</p><br />
<p>Well when BoA did their standard reorg they seperated the ATM fees and hit me with overdraft fees on those as well.</p><br />
<p>I swear I heard the CS agent giggling when i called to have them removed.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:37:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254237</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254237" />
    <title>Comment from Jesse on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jesse</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5101707/fdic-critizes-banks-overdraft-fees#c9247705" rel="nofollow">Sandtiger</a>:</p><br />
<p>Unlike what Ron Paul leads you to believe, the Government does not arbitrarily create money to pay for things.</p><br />
<p>Most of the time, the Treasury will issue bonds to pay for large projects. That's why the national debt as a percentage of GDP is projected to balloon.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:36:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254178</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254178" />
    <title>Comment from TCTH on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>TCTH</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I had a little talk with somebody claiming to be a VP of customer service for BofA not long ago and the man simply lied in his teet.  He claimed that checks or other debits are honored largest to smallest as protection for the customer and went on to relate some bullshit story about a woman in Las Vegas who lost her home because they did it the other way.</p>
<p>He claimed that the majority of their customers preferred the way the they do it now and that they're just responding to public demand.</p>
<p>Bullcrap, pure and simple, but it's all I got after using a couple of phone numbers I got here.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:33:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9254059</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9254059" />
    <title>Comment from MisterTerry on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>MisterTerry</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>This is the exact reason my fiance and I quit Wachovia. After a while, they got wise to when each of our respective "pay days" were and would begin holding all transactions the week leading up to that day only to clear all in a flurry overnight before adding the deposit resulting in several overdraft fees and curiously a positive balance (result of - withdrawals - fees + deposit = lower balance but still a positive balance).</p><br />
<p>I walked into the local branch and told them I would like to close my account, asked why I replied "I can't afford to bank with you."</p><br />
<p>I like ing orange direct for the reason that they cover any overdraft and simply charge interest on the negative balance until you make a deposit. Of the times, I had to utilize this, the interest was always covered by their interest paid back to me on my checking account balance for the month.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:27:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9253997</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9253997" />
    <title>Comment from CLEADD on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>CLEADD</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9253397" rel="nofollow">mmcnary</a>:</p>
<p>Also irritating, if you use a debit card at the store - instant removal of your money. If you make a return, it takes 3 days for the money to show into your account.</p>
<p>We bought an item at Lowe's, got to the car and found it was the wrong one.  Went back in, returned it, got the right one.  What happened?  Two charges of $200 from my checking account, but the credit of $200 doesn't show up for days.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:25:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9253635</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9253635" />
    <title>Comment from CLEADD on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>CLEADD</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>National City screwed us over as well.</p>
<p>We deposited a check on a Saturday.  Later that afternoon, we wrote a check for less than we deposited to buy some furniture.</p>
<p>Monday was a bank holiday.  On Tuesday, National City processed the check we wrote for the furniture first, then gave us a bounce fee.  Then they processed all of our small misc. debits, then gave us more bounce fees.  Finally, they credited the check, but by that point the bounce fees had added up to over $200, even though at no point were we ever below zero.  But with the bounce fees, we were far below zero, with additional fees threatened for being overdrawn.</p>
<p>I understand the risk of depositing a check and then writing a check the same day.  The criminal activity, in my opinion, was the processing from the highest to lowest debits, and then processing deposits. The bank manager was like, "wow that really sucks, but there's nothing I can do."  He gave the standard, "people wouldn't want their mortgage check to bounce" excuse.</p>
<p>We left for KeyBank, who has unfortunately been just as bad.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T19:01:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9253397</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9253397" />
    <title>Comment from mmcnary on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>mmcnary</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>The thing that gripes me the most is the fact that the banks can debit your accounts on weekends, but they can't credit them.  My wife paid the same electric bill twice (don't ask) and we got notified of the low balance on Saturday morning.  I get email when the balance falls below a certain amount.  So I transfer funds from savings to checking, more than enough to cover that bill and the others that I know are coming out.</p>
<p>No joy.  The bank debits all of the transactions on Saturday, but doesn't credit the funds transfer until Monday.  Hello $230 in overdraft charges.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T18:39:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9253306</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9253306" />
    <title>Comment from psuchad on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>psuchad</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>On the flip side.  What about the fees given to the companies and individuals cashing the checks?  With this practice instead of one innocent person getting a $15-$20 fee, there are now multiple people getting the fee.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T18:31:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9253280</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9253280" />
    <title>Comment from CountryJustice on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>CountryJustice</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248214" rel="nofollow">Matt Redacted</a>: </p><blockquote>A K-9 officer arrived on the scene shortly after the robbery was reported but was there only as a responding officer. Bays said the dog could not be used to track the suspect in the cold, snowy weather Wednesday night</blockquote>
<p>Well how about that?  I now know when to rob a bank if I don't want dogs on my trail...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T18:28:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9253101</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9253101" />
    <title>Comment from kiltman on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>kiltman</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Recently had a good experience with Chase. Because of my forgetting to transfer funds from my wife's checking account, a number of items were pending on my checking account one evening (totaling @$300). I know that my account is set up to cover this by tagging me with a transfer charge and will transfer money to cover from a connected credit card. I still transfered the money expecting the hit the next day. But there wasn't one. Rather suprised!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T18:05:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9253011</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9253011" />
    <title>Comment from corinthos on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>corinthos</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>What really blows is when its another companies fault. At sears 3-4 years ago. I purchased a 1100 dollar 19.2 v drill. The cashier had done a price check before I was rang up. Then when it was on the screen for my signature he said he couldn't go back but he could void it afterwards. Anyways some how it took the money out of my account and then put it back in three days later during that I racked up 280 dollars in over draft fees including buying a 2 liter of coke for 30 dollars.<br />
They got it taken care of eventually at the bank(5/3rd)... 3 weeks later. During that time my account was basically just frozen and I couldn't do anything to it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T17:51:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9252780</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9252780" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>What I love is the fairly recent process of converting a paper check to an electronic one (ACH).  I've had a couple of bills where if the ACH doesn't get approved they would re-run it several times, often in the same day.  Each time they attempted to process it I got hit with an over draft fee.  So now my $50 payment had over $300 in over draft fees all in the same day.

<p>I spent several hours on the phone and it took several attempts to get the CSR to understand it was the same payment being attempted multiple times. I finally got all but the original over draft removed.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T17:02:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9252754</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9252754" />
    <title>Comment from ckaught78 on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>ckaught78</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5101707/fdic-critizes-banks-overdraft-fees#c9252375" rel="nofollow">squishyalt</a>: Perhaps people shouldn't be going to Starbucks if they have no money in there checking accounts.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T16:56:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9252744</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9252744" />
    <title>Comment from ckaught78 on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>ckaught78</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Actually Check 21 legislation plays more of a part in collecting overdraft fees than reordering checks. For those that don't know, Check 21 allows for the extronic clearing of checks. Meaning a bank or a company can take an image of a check and send it electronically to be cleared versus snail mail as before. This allows for checks to be cleared same day versus 2 to 3 days like before. People aren't able to kite checks like before so no more buy groceries at Wal-Mart on Wednesday with no money in your account knowing you will get paid Friday. It also allows for envelope free ATM's. When you put a check in an envelope free ATM it takes an image of it and sends it electronically for clearning. The checks collected by the machine are destroyed.</p><br />
<p>Anyway, I agree with the post above in that if you want to avoid overdraft fees, don't write more checks then you have money for in your account.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T16:53:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9252723</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9252723" />
    <title>Comment from ckaught78 on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>ckaught78</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>People still write checks?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T16:48:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9252721</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9252721" />
    <title>Comment from KStrike155 on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>KStrike155</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9252120" rel="nofollow">MightyCow</a>: With my Bank of America account I have the option of either using my credit card or my savings account.</p>
<p>You might want to call your bank and ask to make sure...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T16:47:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9252716</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9252716" />
    <title>Comment from KStrike155 on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>KStrike155</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>So one way to help with working against this is to set up overdraft protection.  I have a Bank of America checking account that used to be charged overdraft fees of $35 per transaction.</p>
<p>Now I have overdraft protection, so when I overdraft it deducts it from either my savings or credit card account (I have it set up for credit card right now because my savings is with ING).</p>
<p>So you just get hit with a $10 transfer fee.  And it's not per transactions, it's for all transactions you made on that day.  So if you have 10 purchases totaling $30, you'll have $40 charged to your credit card or savings a day or 2 later, rather than the $350 you would have racked up in overdraft fees.</p>
<p>NOTES:<br />
-Obviously this is not ideal, still.<br />
-If you set it up from your credit card, it's considered a cash advance.  Cash advance interest is much higher than your APR, and your company probably applies payments to the balance with the lowest APR first.  If you have a large balance on your CC already this could be a problem.<br />
-Ummm screw banks?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T16:46:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9252710</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9252710" />
    <title>Comment from muchenik on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>muchenik</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9249402" rel="nofollow">crashfrog</a>: I have had 2. and 3. happen enough times that I had to take off automatic bill pay for my cars. The deposit would come in on the 1st and before automatic bill pay would clear by the 2nd. After the payments were automated for the 4th, somehow now the deposit doesn't clear until the 5th.</p>
<p>So here I am back to writing the checks again and spending a stamp.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T16:45:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9252375</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9252375" />
    <title>Comment from squishyalt on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>squishyalt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Bastards of America does also practices this predatory banking.  When I asked why they allowed their customers a choice of paper or electronic statements but did not allow them a choice of paying largest bills first or to pay bills as they are presented at the bank, I was told that they had to do it the same way for all customers.</p>
<p>When I brought up the different billing choices for customers the parrot at Bastards of America simply repeated what she has been told to say - everybody has to have their accounts handled the same way.</p>
<p>These practices should be banned under predatory lending laws.  Because of these practices, a $3.60 hot chocolate at Starbucks has cost me $38.60.  If making me a small loan of $3.60 and charging me $35.00 for the "convenience" WITHOUT MY CONSENT is not predatory lending, just what the hell is?</p>
<p>Predatory loans are capped at around 30%.  This little drinks interest (call it what you like - but it is interest just the same) amounts to over 1,000% interest!</p>
<p>FVK ME!  I'll loan out money all day long for 1000% interest in 3 days (the avg time it takes to charge me after they pay a larger check first and bounce my many fast food purchases).</p>
<p>Over a year, the annual interest rate (assuming that 3 days at 1000%+ is ony 3/365 of the annual loan) would actually be around 122,000%!!  WTF!?</p>
<p>That's it!  I quit. I'm starting a bank.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T15:11:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9252120</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9252120" />
    <title>Comment from MightyCow on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>MightyCow</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>My current favorite is that if my checking account is overdrawn, they don't just transfer the money out of my savings, even though there's enough to cover the balance. Instead, they charge it to my bank credit card (which they opened for me, as a "convenience", and which I have to have for the highest rate savings account) as a cash advance on the card. So not only do I get the bounced check fee, I get the cash advance fee.</p>
<p>I'm just waiting for the next step, where they decide to pay my credit card automatically from the checking account, which will then go into a perpetual loop and result in me personally bailing out the bank.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T14:12:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9252070</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9252070" />
    <title>Comment from ScarletBegonias on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>ScarletBegonias</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Perfect Example.<br />
 I deposit cash into my bank account every Friday an hour before the 3pm cut off when money gets credited to the next business day. At the time I was getting a $200 bill taken out of my account automatically on friday's and my account was negative $129. I deposited $400 to bring my account to $0 and to cover the $200 and a $50 bill that was to be taken out on that monday. I should have been positive $21 right? WRONG. On Monday my balance was NEGATIVE $456. I called the bank and I am told that because my account was negative, they decided on Thursday Morning to not send out the money for my $200 bill unless my account was current before 11am on Friday morning. They didn't notify me or anything. I got charged a fee for that, and a fee for the money that was taken out for the bill on Monday that didn't get paid. When I asked what happened to the Four Hundred dollars in Cash that was deposited, I was told that it haddent cleared. Cash takes four days to clear?! <br />
 I usually deposit between $200-$500 every week and in the time it takes me to drive five minutes to my house, the money is already cleared and ready for me to use it. It wasn't a holiday either, I've made that mistake before and had fees out the ass because the bank was closed a day because of a holiday. If my account goes negative it doesn't stay that way for very long, two or three days tops.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T13:59:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9251737</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9251737" />
    <title>Comment from Twinrevanoe on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Twinrevanoe</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>A two-dollar snack =/= $70 Overdraft Fee</p>
<p>Seriously, what the hell? And this happened to one of my friends, so it only makes you think what kind of shenanigans banks are up to.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T12:46:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9251633</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9251633" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>What I'd like to know is why overdraft fees work on the basis of a flat rate? Why not have overdraft fees be a percentage of the overdraft? As it is, overdrafting seems designed to screw over people for whom ~35 dollars is something to blink at. I've been in a situation where some tiny, tiny charges I had forgotten put me slightly into the red... I'm talking -5.00, here... but in four or so transactions. Of course, it's my fault I let it happen... but is it reasonable to charge over a hundred for that?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T12:30:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9251603</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9251603" />
    <title>Comment from RileyPrometheus on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>RileyPrometheus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I still do not understand why these ridiculous fees are so common in the US.

<p>Like I said before in Germany all you have to pay is interest on the amount below zero (used to be between 15 and 20% p.a.). That sucks and I'm always amazed how long you can have a nice amount of money in your account and the interest earned will be more than eaten up by just one day in the red.<br />
If I would have to pay a overdraft fee in the range of $20 only once that would most probably eat up the interest I earned on my checking account in my entire life... the are crooks!</p>

<p>Unfortunately we are starting to see these pitfall fees in Germany too. Some Creditcard companies started and now banks seem to follow. Back in the days I guess people would have simply canceled business with a company that is trying to implement all kind of measures just to catch you with hefty fees.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T12:25:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9251601</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9251601" />
    <title>Comment from chrisjames on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>chrisjames</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9249402" rel="nofollow">crashfrog</a>: This is silly.  The ledger balance doesn't have to mirror the bank's balance.  I've been doing this for years, the entire time working around stalling banks, paying bills on payday, and zeroing out frequently, and I've never ODed since I started my own balance.  <i>Ledgers work</i> and are always more accurate than the bank's balance.</p>
<p>You make all your deposits and withdrawals based directly off your ledger.  Use the bank's information only to confirm that the changes have been made, whenever the hell that is.  Exact dates are moot except when you're playing the float, or desperate to make a payment on the day you make a withdrawal.</p>
<p>If you're making deposits and withdrawals so close, take your check physically to a bank, deposit it in person, and get a receipt--or consider direct deposit, which has fewer delays.  Make fewer insta-payments online.  It's much easier paying all my bills by check and eating the stamp cost than managing even one online account anyway.  Even without fraud working against you, you still have to wait for transactions to process.  Ledgers help you time those transactions appropriately.</p>
<p>If you're forced to play the float, then you have no recourse and a ledger won't help much.  It happens, that's life.  Work harder, make budgeting sacrifices, and get over it.  Still, <i>keep your own balance<i>.</i></i></p>
<p><i><i>You can badmouth the stupid overdraft protection service, or the banks' borderline criminal reording of transactions, but you can't ever make an argument against keeping your own record of how much money you put in and take out of the bank.</i></i></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T12:25:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9251549</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9251549" />
    <title>Comment from Feminist Whore on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Feminist Whore</name>
        <uri>http://happilybitter.wordpress.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://happilybitter.wordpress.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5101707/fdic-critizes-banks-overdraft-fees#c9249402" rel="nofollow">crashfrog</a>: <i>Sure, grandpa, you could probably have avoided all of these problems back in 1940,</i></p><br />
<p>.giggle.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T12:16:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9251541</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9251541" />
    <title>Comment from Sarcasmo48 on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sarcasmo48</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5101707/fdic-critizes-banks-overdraft-fees#c9250920" rel="nofollow">failurate</a>: Exactly. Why get one overdraft fee on one mortgage payment when you can let that one go through and charge you for all the others that didn't.</p><br />
<p>Also, it's not that they "refuse" to clear a transaction when your account is in the red. Your balance for the day is the last closing balance, say $200. If you buy something for $199, then buy something else for $2, your "available balance" is -$2. But when you go to buy that $2 item, all the computer knows when you swipe your card, is that your balance is $200. Hence you get stung for $35 for that $2 candy and soda binge.</p><br />
<p>Why on earth the computer cannot track realtime balances is beyond me. They claim it's because some transactions that are pending don't actually post, so it's less accurate. But if they don't it only INCREASES your available balance.</p><br />
<p>It's not quite a conspiracy, it's just convenient computing for your bank.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T12:15:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9251417</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9251417" />
    <title>Comment from chrisjames on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>chrisjames</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>Best finance practice: keep a ledger and follow the ledger only.  Very easy to start, maintain, and reference.  There's few reasons not to--I guess lack of pens is the only good one.</p>
<p>But more importantly: I like the idea of overdraft protection, but it definitely should be proportional to the charge.  Otherwise, where's the protection?  Instead of paying the bounced check fee to the creditor, you're paying it to the bank, but the fee still exists and is now also applied to debit and ATM transactions.  You become more vulnerable with this service.</p>
<p>And OD-ing at an ATM, that's god-damned heresy!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T11:56:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9251339</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9251339" />
    <title>Comment from Phillip M. Vector on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phillip M. Vector</name>
        <uri>http://www.mostdeadlygame.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mostdeadlygame.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9249190" rel="nofollow">Tsubasa</a>: It gets worse when it's on the weekend.</p>
<p>I once overdrafted because of the resorting 4 fees because the charge I made on Friday didn't clear until monday at midnight.</p>
<p>Somehow, the computers don't like to work on the weekends.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T11:47:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9251134</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9251134" />
    <title>Comment from lihtox on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>lihtox</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>(This might not be directly relevant to the issue at hand, but it's my pet peeve and it's about bank fees, so here goes:)</p>
<p>In any other business relationship, if you are charged with a fee or other penalty, you are presented with a bill which you can review and then pay with whatever source of money you choose.  I think it would be reasonable to force banks to follow the same strategy; at the very least, require banks to notify you of fees at least one week before withdrawing the money from your account.  This would eliminate a lot of the compounding-fee problems we see going on.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T11:24:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9251128</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9251128" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is the part that most people forget about. Everything purchased is run from largest to smallest. This includes credit and debit. They FORGET to tell you that all charges made through these companies that back these cards guarantee the money for the purchase. This means that no matter what, your account will be debited for that purchase. So, why would purchases with a card need to be run from largest to smallest?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T11:24:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9250920</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9250920" />
    <title>Comment from failurate on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>failurate</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>"Bankers defend it saying that people would rather their cable bill to bounce than their mortgage payment..."</p>
<p>What they meant to say was, "If we cash the big one first we can charge the NSF fee on it and all of the smaller charges.  You know, double, triple, or even quadruple dip."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T10:58:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9250869</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9250869" />
    <title>Comment from tbax929 on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>tbax929</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5101707/fdic-critizes-banks-overdraft-fees#c9250577" rel="nofollow">Roclawzi <br />
<p>Well said (er, written)</p></a></p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T10:52:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9250794</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9250794" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have a home based business, so I ship with Fedex every day, Fedex charge you on a weekley bases  on the item that has been shipped.  I used Bank fo America Ceck Card.  I average shipping is 35 pieces of every week. I wrote a check for my home rent of $1650, and I had $1500 in my account and expected money to be posted in my bank account, but it was delayed.  My total shipping for that week was $800. the 35 shipping charges were on hold in my daily online bank activities, then the rent check came, all the sudden all the held amounts were dropped and off course the bank couldn't cover the rent check amount, and bounced the check and charged me $35 fees, and bounced all the 35 shipping costs which varied from $15 to $40, and the back hit me with $35x 35 shipment total of $1225!!! So when I called the bank, they said nothing can be done. I said I will not pay you a dime. Moneth passed, then they called me offering me to delete some of the fees, I said not a dime I will pay from it, then they called again offered more fees to be deleted. I said no way. Then the eventually called me and offered me to pay only $200 from the fees, i said not a dime, then they refered it to a collection company, whuch i told them to F.OFF.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T10:44:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9250713</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9250713" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I work at a credit union, where we have a 'real time' system. 

<p>You make a deposit at an ATM at 2:30 AM? You get the first 1000$ credited instantly.</p>

<p>Your automatic payment for your mortgage is the same day as your direct deposit? Guess what? Your direct deposit comes first, then your mortgage payment!</p>

<p>As far as what  Tsubasa  was talking about, we reverse any overdraft fees that were caused by fraud. Someone steal your debit card and make purchases that caused you to overdraft? We'll reverse the fees, and get you started on the way to disputing the charges and get your money back.</p>

<p>The biggest thing that I see is that people don't budget. The first question I ask when someone calls in to ask for a refund on overdraft fees is: </p>

<p>"Do you keep a check/transaction register?"</p>

<p>70% of them say no.</p>

<p>Should we reward people for not keeping track of their expenses?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T10:37:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9250577</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9250577" />
    <title>Comment from Roclawzi on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Roclawzi</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>My daughter's daycare holds the checks for random amounts of time, up to 3 weeks, before depositing.   My wife's doctor, inexplicably, has held checks for 4-5 months at a time.  I can usually keep track, but money is tight right now and it's hard to keep track of everything after so much time, and  my wife is less careful than I am.  At the very least, I think it's reasonable to restrict banks from charging more than 50% of the value of the transaction and no more than 15 dollars per transaction.  This will make the banks be more likely to offer REAL overdraft protection.  It's not going to hurt them, it's not like they do any work for it, it's a generated computer response on your account, I get generated emails, and I used to get regular mail recapping the overdraft fee.  The only thing about it that actually costs them anything is paying the CSRs who have to continually deal with people calling up to complain that their paycheck was held so their car payment would bounce etc etc.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T10:24:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9250168</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9250168" />
    <title>Comment from Phexerian on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phexerian</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Banks have been calling these "Convenience fees" for quite a while.  Funny thing is, it is only convenient to the bank, not the consumer.  This is an excuse for the banks to rack up more money.  Even if one were to go to a bank and tell them, if my account goes red (into the negative) then decline the transaction, they won't do it.  They will refuse to do it because they know this makes them a lot of money.</p>
<p>At the very least, congress should pass legislation that allows a consumer to OPT out of this shady financial practice.  Of course the banks are going to try and make it difficult to do that and will certainly lobby against any legislation pushing forth in this manner.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T09:56:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9250001</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9250001" />
    <title>Comment from Kekaha on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kekaha</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If the banks are concerned about their customers' desires as to the order of clearing charges to their accounts, I believe it may be possible in the 21st century to ask them and program the bank computers to follow their wishes.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T09:43:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9249582</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9249582" />
    <title>Comment from katylostherart on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>katylostherart</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248979" rel="nofollow">RevMorose</a>: see roeroica response above.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T09:12:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9249520</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9249520" />
    <title>Comment from MyPetFly on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>MyPetFly</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248723" rel="nofollow">midwestkel</a>:</p>
<p>The acid kicked in while typing...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T09:09:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9249428</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9249428" />
    <title>Comment from glater on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>glater</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think what's worse is the practice of defaulting to withdrawals first, *then* deposits, regardless of chronological order.  Are banks still pulling that crap, too, so you can actually have the money and *still* get hosed?</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T09:03:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9249402</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9249402" />
    <title>Comment from crashfrog on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>crashfrog</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248979" rel="nofollow">RevMorose</a>: How do you suggest one keep an accurate balance in your checkbook when:</p>
<p>1) The bank is re-ordering deposits without telling you<br />
2) The bank is delaying deposits without telling you<br />
3) The bank cannot give you an accurate balance at any time</p>
<p>Sure, grandpa, you could probably have avoided all of these problems back in 1940, when you actually <i>could</i> rely on the bank to be using the same kind of accounting you were using to balance your checkbook.</p>
<p>Here in the now, with "creative accounting" fully deployed against your financial interests, a balanced checkbook is absolutely no guarantee that you actually have any money in your bank account, no matter how good your math skills might be.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T09:01:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9249297</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9249297" />
    <title>Comment from JCZ on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>JCZ</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5101707/fdic-critizes-banks-overdraft-fees#c9248790" rel="nofollow">oneswellfoop</a>: That's a great way to get people on your side... "Since you have all that extra money, and you're so responsible, how about you send me a check for a couple hundred dollars and demonstrate how wise and wonderful you are."</p><br />
<p>Look, my family came to this country with literally nothing. My great grandfather was an indentured servant who worked his way out of debt in Poland. He did all this only to end up living in the Great Depression. Instead of asking for handouts, why not act greatful for what you have. The ability to go to law school is an amazing opportunity, and you should be proud of that. Don't ask for sympathy, work for respect.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T08:54:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9249288</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9249288" />
    <title>Comment from Tsubasa on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tsubasa</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248318" rel="nofollow">Roeroica</a>: So fraud is OK, because it is the consumer's job to anticipate and plan around fraud attempts? Financial planning practices are not the topic being discussed.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T08:54:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9249271</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9249271" />
    <title>Comment from greggen on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>greggen</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>A few years ago I was burned by making a deposit (minutes after 3pm) had some change about $50 dollars worth, and then taking $20 out of the ATM.</p>
<p>Since my deposit was after 3pm, it was credited on the next business day.<br />
Since my ATM withdrawal was after 3pm (but before 6pm) it was debited on that business day.</p>
<p>The Overdrafts ate my deposit.  Quicker than you can say "Banker needs a new pony!"  Guess I should learn to balance my checking better, er RevMorose?</p>
<p>PS.  The best part was there were three small checks went through, each less than $5, no more than $8 total.  Each had their own double overdrafts.  I think it was over $200 by the time the dust settled.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T08:53:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9249235</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9249235" />
    <title>Comment from shockwaver on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>shockwaver</name>
        <uri>http://blog.shockwaver.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.shockwaver.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248979" rel="nofollow">RevMorose</a>: Of course that is assuming that the bank doesn't accidently transfer money out of your account. Or a merchant doesn't double or triple charge you on a debit card. Shit happens, and despite making a good living, I have been down to the single digit dollars in my account.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T08:50:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9249190</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9249190" />
    <title>Comment from Tsubasa on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tsubasa</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's just plain dishonesty. It's not helpful to anyone. How can they get away with arbitrarily reordering transactions just because they happened to arrive within the same calendar date?</p>
<p>* Scenario 1:<br />
Your paycheck (+) is deposited at 11:58PM. Your mortgage payment (-) goes through at midnight. Since these are separate calendar days, the bank can't reorder them. All is well.</p>
<p>* Scenario 2:<br />
Your paycheck (+) is deposited at 11:58PM. Your mortgage payment (-) goes through at 11:59PM. Too bad for you, the bank has decided that you'd really rather the mortgage payment be processed first. Massive fees headed your way.</p>
<p>I really believe this is fraud.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T08:48:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9249011</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9249011" />
    <title>Comment from ShirtNinja on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>ShirtNinja</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248318" rel="nofollow">Roeroica</a>: Obvious troll is obvious</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T08:38:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9248979</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9248979" />
    <title>Comment from RevMorose on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>RevMorose</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>or, as an alternative, people could actually balance their checkbooks like they agree to when they open an account and not make transactions for more than what is available.</p>
<p>This would suggest they actually read their Deposit Agreements (the booklet of fine print that comes with a checking account), which, in my experience working in the call center of a major bank, they rarely do.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T08:37:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9248790</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9248790" />
    <title>Comment from oneswellfoop on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>oneswellfoop</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248318" rel="nofollow">Roeroica</a>: <br />
I'm so glad that you realize that you are both more intelligent and responsible than most people!  You also, apparently, make more money.  Some people, like me, don't make a ton.  I won't until after I get out of law school.  Until then, it can get down to being the day of, or occasionally, the day after something is due before I have the money in my account to pay it.</p>
<p>An unexpected expense of, say $300, that is nothing to some people, can affect my budget for a month and a half to two months.  Since you have all that extra money, and you're so responsible, how about you send me a check for a couple hundred dollars and demonstrate how wise and wonderful you are.</p>
<p>And yes, I budget harshly.  My only un-necessary expenses are on slightly nicer ingredients to use cooking at home.  I view those as important, since I'd rather spend a little less overall on quality and healthy food than a ton on health care resulting from the over consumption of processed foods.</p>
<p>Don't be such as a$$hat</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T08:27:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9248757</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9248757" />
    <title>Comment from Git Em SteveDave loves this guy-&gt;â˜… on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Git Em SteveDave loves this guy-&gt;â˜…</name>
        <uri>http://www.CanItKillTheGrimace.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.CanItKillTheGrimace.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248318" rel="nofollow">Roeroica</a>: Some of us have problems paying bills not due to not having money, but b/c we have organizational issues that aren't in our control, and sometimes sh1t happens.  I'm just saying that I have forgotten to pay bills once or twice, and only realized after sending the checks that I didn't make a deposit or two or transferred money from my online savings account to my checking account.  What's bad is the banks "protection" costs more than the bounced check fee.  I had this issue with a CC.  Rather than decline a sale, they charged me $35 /c I went over my limit.  They said it was so I wouldn't get embarrassed.  I told them my pride is worth less than $35.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T08:25:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9248744</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9248744" />
    <title>Comment from sonneillon on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>sonneillon</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248318" rel="nofollow">Roeroica</a>: Always preferable but not always applicable. Those making minimum wage get shafted the most by this.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T08:24:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9248723</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9248723" />
    <title>Comment from midwestkel on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>midwestkel</name>
        <uri>http://www.myspace.com/midwestkel</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.myspace.com/midwestkel">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248344" rel="nofollow">Zagroseckt</a>: I didn't understand  a word you just said.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T08:23:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9248668</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9248668" />
    <title>Comment from kaptainkk on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>kaptainkk</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248318" rel="nofollow">Roeroica</a>: Wow I guess you must be rolling in money. Not everyone is as lucky as you!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T08:19:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9248469</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9248469" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248318" rel="nofollow">Roeroica</a>: 
I currently have a negative balance because my trust department had a 'system change-over' and my monthly transfer of  $3000 was not sent.

<p>There are many reasons why people keep the bill account small.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T08:06:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9248379</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9248379" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9248318" rel="nofollow">Roeroica</a>: It's important to remember though, that this is the United States, where the average person spends beyond their means and has tons of debt.  So for most people, paying bills "down to the wire" is probably far too common.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T08:01:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9248344</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9248344" />
    <title>Comment from Zagroseckt on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Zagroseckt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Back in the day when a bounced check ment that the check was not paid this practis was nicer. BuuuuT if the bank is going to sit there and drive the acount 400% MORE into the negetive by not only "Bounching" but Clearing each check then the "nicer thing to do would be"</p>
<p>Pay the cable watter bla bla bla and let the big boy bounce (charge fee and then get cleard for payment)</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T07:59:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9248318</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9248318" />
    <title>Comment from Roeroica on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Roeroica</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>maybe people should realize they have a bill due and pay it before they are down to the wire.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T07:57:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9248214</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9248214" />
    <title>Comment from Matt Redacted on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Matt Redacted</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9247935" rel="nofollow">tmlfan81</a>: Perhaps this guy wanted his overdraft fees refunded.<br />
<a href="http://www.pantagraph.com/articles/2008/12/03/news/doc4937153547654951292969.txt" rel="nofollow">[www.pantagraph.com]</a><br />
I saw the police racing to the scene on my way home from work tonight.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T07:51:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9247935</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9247935" />
    <title>Comment from tmlfan81 on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>tmlfan81</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>This very practice is why I HATE National City.  They are the first bank (first place I had was a credit union, then my wife's small town bank because it was closer, and then National City because of fraud) that has ever re-ordered transactions and I've actually gotten into the habit of taking daily snapshots of my transactions online just so I can demonstrate to my wife, and anyone that loves to support National City, that they in fact do this.</p>
<p>*Because it isn't enough that I can prove when transactions actually took place, the average time it takes to process said transaction, and the almost clockwork fashion in which all my transactions get re-ordered.</p>
<p>/Yes, this practice has screwed me<br />
/$36 at a time</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T07:34:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9247705</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9247705" />
    <title>Comment from Sandtiger on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sandtiger</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9247572" rel="nofollow">Git Em SteveDave loves this guy->â˜…</a>:</p>
<p>Dont you know?  The fed doesn't actually have to have a balance in their accounts to withdraw funds.  They just edit their account and add a few zeros to the left of the decimal point and make sure they have a one all the way to the left each time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T07:20:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707-comment:9247572</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5101707" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/fdic-criticizes-banks-overdraft-fees.html#c9247572" />
    <title>Comment from Git Em SteveDave loves this guy-&gt;â˜… on 2008-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Git Em SteveDave loves this guy-&gt;â˜…</name>
        <uri>http://www.CanItKillTheGrimace.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.CanItKillTheGrimace.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's obviously not making them THAT much money.  I hope the fed has overdraft protection for their bailout checks.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-04T07:09:30Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



