<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T14:09:06Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Angry Users Trash TurboTax&apos;s Amazon Rating After Price Hike</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5105492" title="Angry Users Trash TurboTax's Amazon Rating After Price Hike" />
    <published>2008-12-09T22:42:57Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-18T00:57:02Z</updated>
    <title>Angry Users Trash TurboTax&apos;s Amazon Rating After Price Hike</title>
    <summary>--&gt;UPDATE: TurboTax Price Hike Reversed After Online Outcry</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Ben Popken</name>
      <uri>http://www.consumerist.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term=" Be Frugal" />
    
    <category term=" E-commerce" />
    
    <category term="Amazon" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/31/2008/12/fallingstar.jpg" width="158" height="168" />-->UPDATE: <a href="http://consumerist.com/5112577/turbotax-price-hike-reversed-after-online-outcry">TurboTax Price Hike Reversed After Online Outcry</a></p>
<p>Intuit raised the price on TurboTax from $44.95 to $59.95, and now, for the first time ever, they're going to charge users $9.95 for <em>each additional return</em> you prepare on it. Previously, you could do up to 5 returns per copy of TurboTax. In revolt, TurboTax users have been <a href="http://www.amazon.com/review/product/B001GL6QHS/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_img?_encoding=UTF8&showViewpoints=1">leaving one-star reviews on Amazo</a><a href="http://www.freecookingrecipes.net/">n</a> in droves. Currently, 122 of the 134 reviews for TurboTax Deluxe are one-star, bringing the software's overall Amazon rating down to 1.5 stars.</p>
]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Compounding the problem is that disclosure of the pricing change is a bit hard to find. Reader Oliver says that, "the only notice of this change to the license is in extremely small print on the back of the software box. Turbotax now promotes the so-called free e-file in bold, large type, but the statement that additional returns are extra is hidden so most people won't notice it until they get home.  Furthermore, they do not clearly point out that additional printed returns are now extra, unlike in the past."</p>
<p>TurboTax VP Bob Meighan responded to the customer concerns in by leaving this comment <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8601-1001_3-10117323.html?communityId=2105&targetCommunityId=2105&blogId=92&tag=mncol;tback#5054972">on a Cnet post</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Let me start by saying that we are absolutely aware that some TurboTax desktop customers have concerns and objections about the changes we?ve made to TurboTax desktop product pricing and we?re responding daily to those comments on Amazon and other online sites, blogs, etc.</p>
<p>For all to know, here is what?s different for 2008.</p>
<p>1. Federal e-filing is now INCLUDED in all TurboTax desktop products. This just makes sense since the majority of TurboTax customers now e-file. With this change, the majority of TurboTax customers will actually save a few dollars this year vs. last year. For example, TurboTax Deluxe costs $15 more this year. However, last year we charged a separate $17.95 federal e-file fee. So for the majority of our customers who e-file, they will save $2.95.</p>
<p>2. Customers who prepare multiple returns with TurboTax will be charged $9.95 for each additional return, which includes federal and state preparation/printing and/or federal e-filing at no additional charge. That means customers who e-filed one or more returns last year will actually pay less this year. For example, a customer who used TurboTax Deluxe software last year to prepare and e-file their own federal return and then prepared and e-filed a second return would have paid $80.85 ($44.95 for the boxed software and then $17.95 x 2 for each e-filed fed return). This year, that same customer will pay $69.90 ($59.95 for the boxed software and only $9.95 for the second federal return). Customers who didn?t e-file last year and want to print multiple returns will end up paying more. Customers can start and work on as many returns as they like and still use all the tax planning features without having to pay extra. They also can continue to print unlimited draft returns for review. But for those who never e-filed, we believe once they try it, they will never go back to paper. It's not just about a fast refund, it's also about eliminating the paper hassles and enabling you to file early and pay your balance due whenever you choose (for example, e-file in February but automatically schedule your payment for April 15).</p>
<p>We believe that TurboTax remains a great value, and as always, it is satisfaction GUARANTEED. If for ANY reason our customers aren't satisfied with having to pay the additional fee, we will refund the fee(s). And we're in the process of creating an automated, online process to make this quick and easy for any customer.</p>
<p>Let me assure you that Intuit is absolutely committed to listening and responding to customers. We never take customer feedback lightly &mdash; and as the author points out, we?re no stranger to having customers voice their opinions about TurboTax. But I have to say, I think that?s one of the reasons that TurboTax is the leading tax prep software year after year ? we have millions of loyal, passionate customers who genuinely care about what we do and who take the time to tell us. We deeply value and appreciate the power of that collective energy and feedback.</p>
<p>I hope this information helps</p>
<p>Bob Meighan<br />
VP, TurboTax</p></blockquote>
<p>For cash-strapped families already feeling the pinch this year, the price increase no doubt feels like a punch in the gut. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/review/product/B001GL6QHS/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_img?_encoding=UTF8&showViewpoints=1">Customer Reviews TurboTax Deluxe Federal + State + eFile 2008</a> [Amazon]<br />
<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10117323-92.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5">Amazon reviewers slam TurboTax fee changes</a> [Cnet] <em>(Thanks to Maurice!)</em></p>
<p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.gettyimages.com">Getty</a>)</p>
]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:10141138</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c10141138" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-01-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9414011" rel="nofollow">bmeighan</a>: OK, tell me how much I will have to pay to file my taxes this year using Turbo Tax?
I file Federal & State by mail I DO NOT AND WILL  NOT EFILE as long as I don't have to by law.  I file a joint return; I file returns for my 3 children I file for my mother and I file for my mother-in-law.  I also file amended returns up to 3 years later because of information that isn't available timely.

<p>I have been using tax prep software since 1993 and TurboTax since 1997.  I am currently evaluating different programs and TT is not looking so good.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-19T20:21:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9580277</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9580277" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9391816" rel="nofollow">QimatAntiope</a>: Yes!  I have been using Turbo Tax online for FREE for years now.  Just go to irs.gov and you can get a complete list of free tax software options, including H&R Block.  There are sometimes income limits, so if you make a ton, you probably won't qualify.  But seriously, why does anyone pay for this ever???</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-19T20:24:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9546026</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9546026" />
    <title>Comment from breny on 2008-12-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>breny</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Mmmmmm, apparently crow tastes pretty good as long as it's accompanied with a nice side of BS.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-18T06:15:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9414011</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9414011" />
    <title>Comment from bmeighan on 2008-12-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>bmeighan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I want to thank you for your candid comments here about TurboTax. I realize that some of you are long-time customers and TurboTax fell short of your expectations. For all TurboTax customers, we regret we caused you such angst.</p>
<p>A number of factors, including your feedback, have prompted us to now enable TurboTax customers to prepare and print multiple returns at no additional cost. Plus, as we've previously communicated, free e-filing is included with every federal return. These changes will be reflected in a TurboTax One-click Update scheduled for release around December 20. As you may know, the IRS limits the number of e-filed returns to five.</p>
<p>We believe these changes make TurboTax the best value for consumers. Including free e-filing with every federal return means a savings of nearly $75 for some of our customers versus last year and a savings of up to $40 compared to our original pricing this year. I believe this now truly reflects our commitment to helping our customers keep more money in their pockets.</p>
<p>We have over 17 million loyal, passionate customers who genuinely care about what we do and who take the time to tell us. Our decision recognizes that your opinions really do count.</p>
<p>Let the tax season begin.</p>
<p>Bob Meighan<br />
VP, TurboTax</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-12T02:29:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9412113</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9412113" />
    <title>Comment from johnnya2 on 2008-12-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>johnnya2</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9361580" rel="nofollow">Ixnayer</a>: Of course, these are legitimate business expenses. My boss wont reimburse them on my expense account, so I assume that it goes under unreimbursed employee expenses</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-12T01:40:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9394470</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9394470" />
    <title>Comment from Rider on 2008-12-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rider</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9371673" rel="nofollow">bravo369</a>: You keep bringing in the same lame strawman argument.  Your mom bought a piece of software with a license for 5 uses.  Your mom broke the law by using it for more than 5 uses.  The company decided to make it so that your mom could no longer do this.  End of story.  How other companies allow people to use their products is irrelevant.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-11T08:42:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9391816</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9391816" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Why pay at all? If your return is simple and you don't need state filing you can use TurboTax online FOR FREE! Just go to www.turbotax.com/free and select the free edition. Sure, they will beg and plead with you throughout the process to upgrade but be strong and you will make it through. p.s. No income limit!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-11T06:24:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9379264</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9379264" />
    <title>Comment from mac-phisto on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>mac-phisto</name>
        <uri>http://n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9371673" rel="nofollow">bravo369</a>: i don't necessarily disagree with your mom's use of the product - letting friends use the software may be stretching fair use, but it's not unconscionable - provided she wasn't charging for the service.</p>
<p>but understand that there were people setting up tax prep businesses around a single copy of turbotax - i know people that were doing this. is that a fair use of the product? i don't think so. will this stop them? probably not, b/c you can still print unlimited prep docs (which are most likely just the filing forms with a big VOID on them). it just means they'll have to sit in front of a typewriter or augment the software with fill-in forms.</p>
<p>so while i personally think you're mom's use is perfectly acceptable, i can understand from a business standpoint why intuit would try to limit filing for multiple users.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T23:16:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9377347</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9377347" />
    <title>Comment from brandymb on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>brandymb</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350701" rel="nofollow">Mike8813</a>: I sit on a local waste water board ang get a small stipend for my service. Last year Turbotax wouldn't let me add the 1099 as income and kept trying to make me do a schedule C like I was running a business. wtf?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T22:25:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9375504</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9375504" />
    <title>Comment from esp13 on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>esp13</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>The price hikes and pay-per return suck, but Turbo Tax is still a great product. I have used it for several years. but last year I found out I qualified for a free use and e-file of TurboTax thru the IRS website. Last years income limit was $54k. You'll be able to check if you qualify in Jan. Combine that with free CalFile and I didn't pay a cent. I say Intuit should drop the base price and keep the $10 charge only if you use the E-file. But still allow free printing regardless of number of returns prepared.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T21:34:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9373587</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9373587" />
    <title>Comment from Jevia on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jevia</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>After years of doing taxes myself for my family, last year, when we bought a house, I bought Turbotax. I had a coupon from Costco, so it only ended up costing about $15 or $20. I didn't want to pay for the efiling (I don't understand why something like that would even be charged a fee, isn't it so much easier to file over the internet and have the information automatically go into the computer rather than mail it in and have someone imput the information into the computer), so I just printed it out and mailed it. Didn't use it for state taxes because in PA, you can just phone in your tax return for free (unless you are covered by one of the very few exceptions).</p><br />
<p>I did like using Turbo tax, it was nice to have it add everything up, calculate it all, etc., instead of doing it myself. I was looking forward to doing it again this year. Guess I'll wait to see if Costco has another coupon.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T20:31:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9372661</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9372661" />
    <title>Comment from nocturnal99 on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>nocturnal99</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9363396" rel="nofollow">bmeighan</a>: Bob:</p>
<p><i>I hope this information helps.</i></p>
<p>Put yourself in the shoes of any person who's commented here or on Amazon and ask yourself seriously: how does that "help"?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T19:55:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9372502</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9372502" />
    <title>Comment from mariospants on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>mariospants</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Whatever happened to the good old "send them all your documents and let the IRS sort it out for you" routine? A friend of mine (here in Canada) has been doing that for the last few years and a couple of times they actually found and gave him write-offs that increased his return that he otherwise (and likely TurboTax) would not have suggested.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T19:48:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9371734</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9371734" />
    <title>Comment from sgtdawg on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>sgtdawg</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9351113" rel="nofollow">Mike8813</a>: <br />As of last year, Tax Cut is offered for free to Military. I know Turbo Tax was previously, but it changed in the last few years.</p><br />
<p>Whatever sevice is offered, they will be listed at Military OneSource.</p><br />
<p>I really do like the online version. I am able to access my previous years returns anywhere there is an internet connection.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T19:02:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9371673</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9371673" />
    <title>Comment from bravo369 on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>bravo369</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9371159" rel="nofollow">mac-phisto</a>: That's where I disagree. Would it be beyond fair use to have my friend come use microsoft office to write up their term paper and create their powerpoint presentation? how about if they want to come use my photoshop to edit a few pictures? while I now know what the turbotax license says, it still makes no sense in my mind if you are printing out the end product. either way, I've warned her already and she's considering buying taxcut instead.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T18:56:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9371240</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9371240" />
    <title>Comment from JustThatGuy3 on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>JustThatGuy3</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9352742" rel="nofollow">TheSpatulaOfLove</a>:</p><br />
<p>Before we got married, my wife sent her taxes to an accountant, and I used TaxCut. For the first year we filed jointly, we decided to try it, so we sent them to the accountant and I did them with TaxCut, as an experiment. Total difference in calculated liability: $6.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T18:02:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9371159</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9371159" />
    <title>Comment from mac-phisto on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>mac-phisto</name>
        <uri>http://n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9353183" rel="nofollow">bravo369</a>: i think your mom is exactly the reason intuit made this move. i know more than one individual that was filing returns for friends, family members &amp; others (sometimes for profit) simply by picking up a copy of turbotax &amp; filing away.</p>
<p>now, i would certainly consider your mom's use among family members "fair use", but when you start sharing the software's benefits among friends, co-workers, &amp; others, you're starting to stretch the bounds of fair, don't you think?</p>
<p>don't get me wrong, intuit sucks &amp; this is a crappy move, but i can certainly understand it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T17:50:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9371146</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9371146" />
    <title>Comment from parkavery on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>parkavery</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9370176" rel="nofollow">Rider</a>: I guess my ultimate point was that essential services like tech support, if a company decides to offer it, need to be worked into the price appropriately. I don't like when the airlines charge for every little "extra" that isn't really an extra (booking fee? water?), and I don't like it here either.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T17:47:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9371102</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9371102" />
    <title>Comment from mac-phisto on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>mac-phisto</name>
        <uri>http://n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9359710" rel="nofollow">verucalise</a>: i've been using taxactonline for the past 3-4 years &amp; it could be free, but i'm a lazy ass &amp; so i pay ~$8 to have them load in any pertinent information from the previous year.</p>
<p>it would cost me another $14 if i also filed state thru them, but CT income tax is free &amp; easy to e-file thru the ct.gov website.</p>
<p>take that turbotax!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T17:39:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9370183</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9370183" />
    <title>Comment from Rider on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rider</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9355896" rel="nofollow">valarmorghulis</a>: No it's not like outlook it's software that come with a license to let 5 people use it.  It's all about the license.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T14:20:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9370176</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9370176" />
    <title>Comment from Rider on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rider</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350374" rel="nofollow">undefined</a>: @<a href="#c9366829" rel="nofollow">parkavery</a>: If they charged for tech the support the ame people bitching now would be bitching about them charging for tech support.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T14:18:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9368167</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9368167" />
    <title>Comment from BlondeGrlz on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>BlondeGrlz</name>
        <uri>http://bebehblog.wordpress.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://bebehblog.wordpress.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9351113" rel="nofollow">Mike8813</a>: We've used TaxSlayer.com in the past, because they offer free federal e-filing for active duty military. They also do state e-filing but I think last time we had to pay a minimal fee. Looking at the website this year they might have made it free at the state level too.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T09:52:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9367568</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9367568" />
    <title>Comment from SpenceMan01 on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>SpenceMan01</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9366366" rel="nofollow">bohemian</a>: He's done the same thing at every other site where his company's new fleecing scheme has been exposed. He hasn't convinced anyone anywhere else, either.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T09:03:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9366829</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9366829" />
    <title>Comment from parkavery on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>parkavery</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9366149" rel="nofollow">bohemian</a>: Yeah, I'm not buying it either. So $9.95 covers...</p>
<p>E-filing? Several people in this thread, myself included, already said we don't use that.</p>
<p>Technical support? How about actually charging for people who use tech support? Nobody in my family has ever used it.</p>
<p>Federal AND state returns? I can't think of a mainstream tax software programme that doesn't do both.</p>
<p>Archiving? I've already paid for my own hard drive, thank you. I don't need my personal data stored by a third party.</p>
<p>Services and infrastructure? Well...</p>
<p>Like everything else, this has nothing to do with additional users. If the MSRP of your software alone is not supporting the infrastructure of your company or not allowing you to turn a profit because of the cost of supporting the product (or whatever today's excuse is), that's not a consumer problem.</p>
<p>We are talking about software that performs a task. Simple. If optional add-on tasks like e-filing and online archives end up costing your company more money, you should charge the people using them, or just average out the cost and include it in the MSRP. It's not that hard.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T08:11:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9366366</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9366366" />
    <title>Comment from bohemian on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>bohemian</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9363396" rel="nofollow">bmeighan</a>: Coming in here repeatedly trying to blow smoke up people's skirts isn't winning you or your company any points. It is probably doing just the opposite. <br />
The VP's at TurboTax seem to be so busy buying their own BS that they quit listening to the customers they expect to buy their product. It is over priced and has invasive DRM.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T07:44:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9366149</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9366149" />
    <title>Comment from bohemian on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>bohemian</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9363078" rel="nofollow">bmeighan</a>: Wow, PR schmaltz. I hope that was someone playing a joke. If someone is actually a VP for a major company and thinks that would come off as something other than insulting they need to get out in the real world a bit more.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T07:32:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9365435</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9365435" />
    <title>Comment from Sian on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sian</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350238" rel="nofollow">concordia</a>: As a State Farm customer I'm offered free filing via turbo tax online through State Farm's website. It's a great little freebie.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T06:50:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9364654</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9364654" />
    <title>Comment from mmcnary on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>mmcnary</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350238" rel="nofollow">concordia</a>: I sent them a letter indicating my displeasure at the rootkit stuff and actually got a call from an executive assistant who assured me that they were removing the DRM from the product for the next year.</p>
<p>And they did.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T06:13:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9364122</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9364122" />
    <title>Comment from downwithmonstercable on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>downwithmonstercable</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9351486" rel="nofollow">OwenIullus</a>: $60? That's unbelievable. Do you just take the standard deduction? I'm going to start going to my parent's CPA, she charges about $150 and covers everything. We paid $125 at H&amp;R block last year. I'd rather have a good CPA do it and pay the extra 25.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T05:51:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9363951</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9363951" />
    <title>Comment from bostonmike on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>bostonmike</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9363171" rel="nofollow">bmeighan</a>: Don't put a warning like that on the box and then expect me to believe that you'll never take advantage of it. You're going to have a boatload of extremely angry customers this spring. The current furor is nothing compared to what it will be like in April.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T05:45:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9363777</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9363777" />
    <title>Comment from MsAnthropy on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>MsAnthropy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9351143" rel="nofollow">battra92</a>:</p>
<p>I used TaxAct last year, and will be using it again this year. No TurboTax, and <i>definitely</i> no H&amp;R Block for me, thanks.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T05:37:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9363745</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9363745" />
    <title>Comment from valarmorghulis on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>valarmorghulis</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/valarmorghulis</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/valarmorghulis">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9362540" rel="nofollow">johnva</a>: Well said. I never intended to question Intuit's security measures (indeed, the gov't already did that with SOX). I'm just stating that sending data over the internet carries inherient risks that can be mitigated, but never entirely blocked. So I, personally, have no concerns about using TurboTax and having my data be compromised in transit or at reception (and yes, the most likly point of interception is the local machine).</p><br />
<p>In general though, a machine that has never been connected to a public network will be more secure than one that has. That was all.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T05:35:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9363396</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9363396" />
    <title>Comment from bmeighan on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>bmeighan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Over the past week, I've responded to a number of posts to help clarify TurboTax pricing. I wanted to provide you with an outside viewpoint as well.</p>
<p>Today CNET posted a very detailed and thorough review of TurboTax and TaxCut desktop and online pricing. The author writes:</p>
<p>"But bargain shoppers should not leap to the conclusion that TaxCut is the less expensive option of the two. After scrutinizing the tax-prep prices, we've reached a more complicated verdict. TaxCut's sticker prices are cheaper all around. However, once you add fees for state returns, TurboTax online looks like the winner in terms of affordability, as it's slightly less expensive for the majority of users, who file only for themselves. TaxCut for the desktop, on the other hand, is cheaper than most editions of the desktop TurboTax."</p>
<p>The author notes that state filing requirements may provide more of an advantage to TurboTax desktop customers. Visit <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10113865-2.html?tag=newsLeadStoriesArea.1" rel="nofollow">[news.cnet.com]</a></p>
<p>I hope this information helps.</p>
<p>Bob Meighan<br />
VP, TurboTax</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T05:22:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9363289</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9363289" />
    <title>Comment from bmeighan on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>bmeighan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350701" rel="nofollow">Mike8813</a>: Mike... TurboTax absolutely does handle the deduction for mileage. I can only assume you may have missed the question. This is a very common tax deduction and if there really were any issue we would know about it immediately.</p>
<p>Bob Meighan<br />
VP, TurboTax</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T05:18:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9363235</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9363235" />
    <title>Comment from bmeighan on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>bmeighan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9363171" rel="nofollow">bmeighan</a>: In my earlier reply I meant to say "I do not recall a single instance of where we increased the price of our desktop product or its services during the year."</p>
<p>Bob Meighan<br />
VP, TurboTax</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T05:16:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9363171</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9363171" />
    <title>Comment from bmeighan on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>bmeighan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350648" rel="nofollow">bostonmike</a>: In my 17 years with Intuit, I do not recall a single instance of where we increased the price of our desktop product or its services. Just as likely, we can reduce the price. In fact this year the vast majority of TurboTax customers will pay less this year than last.</p>
<p>Bob Meighan<br />
VP, TurboTax</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T05:14:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9363078</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9363078" />
    <title>Comment from bmeighan on 2008-12-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>bmeighan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350374" rel="nofollow">chris_l</a>: The $9.95 fee includes FEDERAL and STATE preparation and printing and/or federal e-filing. There really are costs associated with preparing additional returns. They include technical support ("how do I" questions), use of our cost basis calculator, use the e-filing services, archival of their returns in our vault, access prior year returns, etc. These services, the infrastructure and support require investments.</p>
<p>We believe that TurboTax remains a great deal, and as always, satisfaction is guaranteed. But if for any reason you don't believe you're getting your money's worth, we will refund the $9.95 fee(s) without question. Right now we're in the process of creating an automated, online process to make this quick and easy for any customer for whatever reason. This satisfaction guarantee is nothing new, but we want every customer to know that they can purchase TurboTax with confidence.</p>
<p>Bob Meighan<br />
VP, TurboTax</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T05:11:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9362563</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9362563" />
    <title>Comment from shepd on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>shepd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This shouldn't have come as any surprise from a company that destroys the boot sector of your hard drive without permission just to run some DRM bullshit.  This is the most invasive thing software can do, and isn't even a step down from viruses:  It's exactly what viruses used to do 15 years ago.</p>
<p><a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/02/16/1549232&amp;tid=185" rel="nofollow">[slashdot.org]</a></p>
<p>Seriously.  What more needs to be said?  Intuit is the worst corporation in the world, if you don't include Sony.  If you think anyone else is worse, think for a moment:  They only stole your money.  They didn't walk up to your car, spray graffiti on it, and steal the engine which is the bar car analogy equivalent of trashing the boot sector.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T04:56:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9362540</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9362540" />
    <title>Comment from johnva on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>johnva</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9361024" rel="nofollow">valarmorghulis</a>: If it's encrypted, the risk of it being intercepted in communication is not very high (assuming you check all the security certificates, etc). And all of these tax prep websites are all encrypted. The fact that it's online doesn't make it much more of a huge risk. SSL can provide essentially a secure channel between you and them.</p>
<p>The bigger threats to the security of your data are either a) the company's servers being compromised, or b) your own computer being compromised via spyware, malware, etc. The malware threat is actually probably a higher risk than the risk of Intuit, etc's servers being breached and your information stolen that way. And if your machine has malware, your data is not going to be secure regardless of whether you use the online or desktop versions. I would worry about that much more than I would worry about someone intercepting your data in transit on the Internet.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T04:55:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9361580</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9361580" />
    <title>Comment from Ixnayer on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ixnayer</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9352790" rel="nofollow">Applekid</a>: wait a minute, you can writeoff hookers and blow?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T04:22:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9361250</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9361250" />
    <title>Comment from ajlei on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>ajlei</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350486" rel="nofollow">GuJiaXian</a>: I've never e-filed either. I actually enjoy doing my taxes by hand. Of course, I've never had anything particularly complicated to take into account, so I guess we'll see what happens when I make a million dollars with all my offshore accounts.. I guess that's when I'll just stop doing my taxes altogether.</p>
<p>Seriously, though, I love my pen and paper and TI-84Plus.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T04:09:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9361070</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9361070" />
    <title>Comment from valarmorghulis on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>valarmorghulis</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/valarmorghulis</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/valarmorghulis">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9357776" rel="nofollow">ultimatecardsfan</a>: Having to write the code that allows you to do so without them being ripped off. Normally that'd just be the cost of doing business, but it is Ticketmaster.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T04:02:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9361024</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9361024" />
    <title>Comment from valarmorghulis on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>valarmorghulis</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/valarmorghulis</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/valarmorghulis">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9359464" rel="nofollow">johnva</a>: Steps can be taken to mitigate these risks, but methods requiring transportation (even electronic) over non-secure lines increases your risk profile with each leg of the process. Since "online" almost always refers to the internet, which communicates over un0secured lines, it isn't an assumption that online has more risks than offline. It is a simple fact.</p><br />
<p>Don't get me wrong here, I'm not advocating any sort of <i>digital agoraphobia</i>. I'm just stating people should be aware that the lines they communicate across are <b>not secure</b>. It is absolutly possible however to make what is being communicated secure. Just be aware.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T04:00:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9360865</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9360865" />
    <title>Comment from themicah on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>themicah</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350346" rel="nofollow">The Name's Ash78, Housewares</a>: Of course, not to be out-sleazed by Intuit, H&amp;R Block has quietly stripped the "+State+eFile" version of TaxCut of free state efiling (it still includes federal efile, but not state).  You'll pay $20 for the privilege of relieving a state employee from the burden of retyping each return.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T03:55:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9360773</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9360773" />
    <title>Comment from Quake &apos;n&apos; Shake on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Quake &apos;n&apos; Shake</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I definitely have to call "Bullshit." I've used Turbo Tax for the last 7 years. Before getting married, I did my wife's taxes with the software too. I never e-filed because FUCK YOU Intuit! That "e-file charge" is my goddamn money! I'll just spend the price of 1st Class postage thank you very much. I can wait an extra couple of weeks for my return.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T03:52:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9360040</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9360040" />
    <title>Comment from UnicornMaster on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>UnicornMaster</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>All i have to say is someone in marketing or upper management is getting fired.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T03:29:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9359710</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9359710" />
    <title>Comment from Verucalise(countingcalories) on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Verucalise(countingcalories)</name>
        <uri>http://www.geocities.com/verucalyse</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.geocities.com/verucalyse">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9350238" rel="nofollow">concordia</a>: I've been using www.taxslayer.com for 4-5 years now, haven't looked back, doesn't cost me more than $10-20 a year. Who the hell would pay that much money to prepare a simple tax return? NOT ME, that's who.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T03:20:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9359676</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9359676" />
    <title>Comment from cf27 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>cf27</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Or buy it at costco for $49.99.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T03:18:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9359671</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9359671" />
    <title>Comment from oldtaku on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>oldtaku</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9354047" rel="nofollow">twritersf</a>: It certainly is relevant. Intuit has a long history of screwing their customers like this, and the only reason they backed off was the damage it did to their business. The copy protection fiasco was also the reason I stopped using TurboTax for good. Why use them when there are so many other options? That $18 fee for e-file is pretty amusing as well, I'm glad they're proud of not screwing you as hard as they did last year... maybe?</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T03:18:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9359464</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9359464" />
    <title>Comment from johnva on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>johnva</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9355571" rel="nofollow">valarmorghulis</a>: What may be irrational, though, is assuming that the online version will have more of those problems than the non-online version.</p>
<p>As far as backup, you should always save the completed return as a PDF and print a paper copy. If it's in a format not controlled by the software, like PDF, then they can't prevent you from accessing it in the future.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T03:12:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9359328</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9359328" />
    <title>Comment from ELC on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>ELC</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I got a brand new, free copy in the mail. :) And I've never used it. NO, it isn't a trial copy and there are no strings attached.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T03:08:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9357989</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9357989" />
    <title>Comment from DeltaTee on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>DeltaTee</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9352114" rel="nofollow">ToniRockyhorror</a>: The only emails I get from TaxAct come in September advertising 50% off the next filing if you start your return then. I've been excessively happy with the online only version. Why would you pay year after year for something else?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T02:26:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9357776</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9357776" />
    <title>Comment from ultimatecardsfan on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>ultimatecardsfan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350374" rel="nofollow">chris_l</a>: Nothing to do with taxes, but it also seriously pisses me off that TicketMaster charges $2.50 to let you print your own tickets to an event. What extra expense do THEY incur by letting you print your own?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T02:21:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9357740</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9357740" />
    <title>Comment from unobservant on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>unobservant</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>"If for ANY reason our customers aren't satisfied with having to pay the additional fee, we will refund the fee(s)."</p><br />
<p>So I can buy it, file multiple returns, bitch about the fees, and get them refunded? SWEET.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T02:20:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9357481</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9357481" />
    <title>Comment from SJChip104 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>SJChip104</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350701" rel="nofollow">Mike8813</a>: H&amp;R's Taxcut program handled that aspect very well.</p>
<p>I switched to TaxCut the year (2003?) TurboTax had some kind of copy protection that remained on your PC even after uninstalling.  I've never found the need to go back.</p>
<p>For some reason, Intuit is hell bent on getting their foot in the door of your PC.  I stopped using Quicken for the times when it would pop up trying to get me to open up an account with their bank or some other service.  I PAID for the damn software, now let me alone!</p>
<p>PS: I used to prepare tax returns.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T02:12:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9357084</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9357084" />
    <title>Comment from j-o-h-n on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>j-o-h-n</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>We've used TaxAct for years and have always been happy.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T02:01:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9356993</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9356993" />
    <title>Comment from BritBoy on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>BritBoy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If your tax situation is simple and easy (one income, no itemizing),  then fill out the 1040 on paper and mail it in.  Done.  1hr or so + a bit more for your state.</p>
<p>If your tax situation has even a slightest complexity,  (itemizing, mortgage, interstate issues) then don't waste your time fighting with these bits of tax prep software.  Just go to an accountant or tax preparer and for a reasonable fee they will quickly and effectively save you more money than their fee or than any simple form filling software ever could.</p>
<p>The actual real market for these bits of software is tiny.  But it is fuelled by hype and FUD.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:58:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9356959</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9356959" />
    <title>Comment from SabreDC on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>SabreDC</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike?#c9356105" rel="nofollow">ilves</a>: I've only ever used TurboTax online, rather than the full version. But on the online one, it's very simple if you move. When you enter your income, it just asks if you have any income from other states. And then it asks a few questions about your residency in the other states.</p><br />
<p>Again, I don't know if that's different than the full version though. I imagine that the full one is much, much more complex...</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:58:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9356920</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9356920" />
    <title>Comment from psm321 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>psm321</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9353630" rel="nofollow">Hooray4Zoidberg</a>: Funny you should say that... the IRS got rid of telefile ~3 years ago, probably after lobbying from the tax software companies.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:57:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9356885</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9356885" />
    <title>Comment from SabreDC on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>SabreDC</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike?#c9355698" rel="nofollow">rockstarjoe</a>: I hate to be "that guy", but a few credit unions that I know offer the same deal. I think it is something like free federal file only, but you still have to pay for state or something like that.</p><br />
<p>If there are any Pennsylvania state employees on here, PSECU does it. Well, they've done it for 2006 and 2007. I assume they will do it again for 2008.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:56:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9356551</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9356551" />
    <title>Comment from Avery on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Avery</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9353630" rel="nofollow">Hooray4Zoidberg</a>: Indeed, this was in Massachusetts. I had a minimal income so I didn't need to buy TurboTax either; I simply put my W3 directly into the online app.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:47:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9356353</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9356353" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hi:

<p>This is Paula from H&R Block.  I've noticed that many of you have commented about trying TaxCut.  I wanted to make sure that you had all the information that you need.</p>

<p>First, we did not raise prices on TaxCut software.  We did not feel that raising prices in this economy was the right thing to do for consumers.  Additionally, we have maintained the ability to file multiple personal federal returns.  In fact, we have added 5 free e-files and do not charge any additional fees to print multiple returns.  We don't think that consumers should have to decide between printing and e-filing their additional returns because of cost. (5 e-files is the IRS limit to prevent fraud)</p>

<p>TaxCut does import from TurboTax software, Quicken and Money to save time on preparing your federal return. TaxCut Premium includes a tax advice session with an H&R Block tax professional and every return that is e-filed receives our Worry-Free Audit Support at no additional charge (comparable to other's audit defense products for $34.95). </p>

<p>I'm happy to answer any other questions about TaxCut.  You can also view a comparison chart at <a href="http://digits.hrblock.com/topicsofinterest/efile/truecost.php" rel="nofollow">http://digits.hrblock.com/topicsofinterest/efile/truecost.php</a></p>

<p>Best regards<br />
Paula from H&R Block</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:43:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9356337</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9356337" />
    <title>Comment from LuzioFantazmic on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>LuzioFantazmic</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>That price is insane for tax prep software.  My tax guy only charges $80 and I itemize.

<p>TaxAct is the way to go if you do it yourself.  It is only $15 for a federal return.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:42:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9356335</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9356335" />
    <title>Comment from bravo369 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>bravo369</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9354297" rel="nofollow">Rider</a>: Well I am trying to find out what version she buys. I am looking at the turbotax website and there are at least 5 different versions. you would ASSUME that there would be at least 1 version that allows you to file a few returns for free. it really makes no sense that my mom does 4 tax returns (parents and 3 kids) and get charged extra.</p><br />
<p>i'm racking my brain to find 1 similar program that generates a report/document but charges extra to generate a new report/document. Adobe acrobat, photoshop, dreamwever, Microsoft word, excel. do those boxed Will makers or lease makers only let you create only one? I wouldn't think so.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:42:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9356216</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9356216" />
    <title>Comment from MikeGrenade on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>MikeGrenade</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350238" rel="nofollow">concordia</a>: I remember that whole mess. Their Amazon rating got wrecked for that little stunt as well.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:40:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9356105</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9356105" />
    <title>Comment from ilves on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>ilves</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Programs like turbo tax are nice when your returns aren't complicated, when you have complicated stuff stuff to file (like myself last year when i moved states halfway through the year and had no idea how to do that on turbotax) its much nicer to go to a person.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:37:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9355896</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9355896" />
    <title>Comment from valarmorghulis on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>valarmorghulis</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/valarmorghulis</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/valarmorghulis">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9354297" rel="nofollow">Rider</a>: I imagine you were trying to @<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9353490" rel="nofollow">bravo369</a>. If so, they never said their mom stole the software. Only that she used it to fill out more than one person's tax return. This is like using Outlook to recieve email from more than one source, or being able to send an email to more than one reciepient. The closest metaphore I can come up with is that Intuit is trying to turn TurboTax into Pay-Per-Tax with a heafty install fee. It isn't that she was stealing it before, it's just that now she will have to pay more with no increase in usability or functionality.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:32:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9355698</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9355698" />
    <title>Comment from rockstarjoe on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>rockstarjoe</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Last year State Farm Insurance offered a free deal for their customers, with the web based TurboTax. I hope they do it again this year!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:26:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9355571</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9355571" />
    <title>Comment from valarmorghulis on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>valarmorghulis</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/valarmorghulis</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/valarmorghulis">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9350346" rel="nofollow">The Name's Ash78, Housewares</a>: Data ownership and backup fears are <b>almost never</b> irrational.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:23:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9355281</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9355281" />
    <title>Comment from tc4b on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>tc4b</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>At least ONE of the financial institutions I do business with always offers me e-tax services for free, or for a small fee ($7 or so).  Is this unusual?  If I hd to pay $60 (or more), I'd hire an actual human.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:14:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9355198</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9355198" />
    <title>Comment from SabreDC on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>SabreDC</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>If Mint.com offered tax prep (like TurboTax Online), that would be so sweet. All my investment accounts are already linked in there. My mortgage is on there. All my student loans are on there. They need to jump into that mix.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:11:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9355081</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9355081" />
    <title>Comment from tc4b on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>tc4b</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9354047" rel="nofollow">twritersf</a>: You must've missed this part: "You can pull that bullshit only once before I'll never trust you again."  I'm also  member of the 'Fool me once...' society, especially when it comes to something so important.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:08:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9355077</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9355077" />
    <title>Comment from oneandone on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>oneandone</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9351134" rel="nofollow">blackmage439</a>: You can only free file with the IRS if your income is less than $54,000 (or you meet some other criteria). Above that, wouldn't you have to buy the software if you wanted to e-file your fed return?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T01:08:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9354726</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9354726" />
    <title>Comment from vastrightwing on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>vastrightwing</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is no different than what the phone companies are doing: charging what the market will pay for something that costs them almost zero when amortized across millions of people. There are online tax sites that allow you to file for FREE. I've used them in the past. In fact, you can use TurboTax free to verify your taxes. You can use TurboTax free as long as you fill out the Federal forms yourself and file them yourself. A small price to pay.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T00:56:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9354297</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9354297" />
    <title>Comment from Rider on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rider</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350374" rel="nofollow">chris_l</a>:So you just admitted your mom has been using turbo tax illegally and now you are wondeing why they have to limit the amount of returns.  Wow.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T00:45:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9354047</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9354047" />
    <title>Comment from twritersf on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>twritersf</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350238" rel="nofollow">concordia</a>: A link to a nearly 6-year-old assertion is hardly authoritative, certainly not relevant, and indicative of a long-held grudge, which greatly diminishes the comment's credibility.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T00:37:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9354001</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9354001" />
    <title>Comment from bohemian on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>bohemian</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Turbo Tax was already overpriced in my opinion. I will be doing my returns by hand this year on paper and mailing them in. After having Turbo Tax not catch that an insurance payment was actually taxed as income, the ensuing penalties, interest and tax attorney to get this fixed, if I have complicated taxes again I will pay him to do them. It would probably be cheaper. <br />
I also dislike the weird rootkit type things they do that show up out of nowhere later on.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T00:36:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9353922</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9353922" />
    <title>Comment from Starfury on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Starfury</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've been using TurboTax online the last few years and haven't had a problem with how the software works.  I did have an issue with the pricing last year: the software was $10 cheaper in the store than online.  I did manage to get them to give $5 back.  Before I do my taxes with them again I'm going to do some price comparisons first.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T00:34:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9353757</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9353757" />
    <title>Comment from banmojo on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>banmojo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Good Ship Intuit:  Prepare yerselves, scallywags, for a boarding afit for a right buxom dame!  Batten the hatches, prepare for BOARDING!!!  HAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGHGHGGHH blah.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T00:29:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9353714</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9353714" />
    <title>Comment from ZukeZuke on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>ZukeZuke</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9351134" rel="nofollow">blackmage439</a>:</p>
<p>4.  Because it is fast and easy.  Time is money.</p>
<p>5.  It prints out clean file copies &amp; also a convenient pdf file.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T00:28:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9353654</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9353654" />
    <title>Comment from Wild Monkey on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Wild Monkey</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350486" rel="nofollow">GuJiaXian</a>: Just hope you never have to deal with AMT.  Then you'll be doing multiple returns at the same time to see which one you have to use.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T00:26:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9353630</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9353630" />
    <title>Comment from Hooray4Zoidberg on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Hooray4Zoidberg</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350475" rel="nofollow">Avery</a>: What state? I remember in MA we had free state filing at first too, then sure enough, gonzo and we were "invited" to file via turbo tax for free the first year. The free part meant the omission of the $9.99 state filing fee, we still had to pay $40 for turbo tax. That was only one year, then after that they started charging again to file.</p>
<p>It's getting out of hand, I'm spending more on tax software than I'm getting back these days. I might as  go back to the old Tele file which is still free I believe. Unless turbo tax's board has lobbied washington to get rid of that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T00:25:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9353490</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9353490" />
    <title>Comment from bravo369 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>bravo369</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9353183" rel="nofollow">bravo369</a>: I also might add that since she does taxes all the time, she flies through returns like an expert. For someone simple like me (no house, no big purchases, no big investments), she can do my return in 10-15 minutes. she has all my info from previous years so she just has to import it, update, print and mail. does that really warrant $10 for 10 minutes of work?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T00:21:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9353183</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9353183" />
    <title>Comment from bravo369 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>bravo369</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9350374" rel="nofollow">chris_l</a>: I want to know how they can charge for printing also. my mom does all this tax stuff for a living. She uses turbotax at home (away from work) and does the entire family's, friends, among others. so does she now have to relay a cost to everyone? what next? microsoft is going to start charging for every word document i create? nero charges for every cd i burn? it makes absolutely no sense. I can understand a charge for efiling but for using my own printer, paper, stamps and energy to mail it? cmon now...that's just stupid.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T00:12:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9353180</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9353180" />
    <title>Comment from parad0x360 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>parad0x360</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350486" rel="nofollow">GuJiaXian</a>: You know whats more satisfying?  Doing, Filing and receiving your return in a week because you did it all over the internet.</p>
<p>That's satisfying.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T00:12:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9353114</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9353114" />
    <title>Comment from crashedpc on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>crashedpc</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9352757" rel="nofollow">Applekid</a>: Whoo, I'm not old enough for a slide rule. I have my TI-86 that I used in high school that's at least 8 years old. For taxes, I use an abacus and lamb entrails.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T00:10:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9352790</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9352790" />
    <title>Comment from Applekid on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Applekid</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9351768" rel="nofollow">m4ximusprim3</a>: Yeah, but then I'd have to tell the local tax preparer about my writeoffs for hookers and blow.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T00:01:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9352757</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9352757" />
    <title>Comment from Applekid on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Applekid</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9352470" rel="nofollow">TheSpatulaOfLove</a>: I wish there was a clear tutorial on how to USE a slide rule... and a place to get one. I want to wow those that shout at me to get off their lawn that, yeah, I too can play with the big boys.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T00:01:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9352742</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9352742" />
    <title>Comment from TheSpatulaOfLove on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>TheSpatulaOfLove</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9351308" rel="nofollow">DeanOfAllTrades</a>:</p>
<p>Yeah, for awhile I thought tax software was a great deal, but as my finances became more complex, I found it had diminishing returns.   I have a rockstar accountant now and for the money he charges to do my taxes, he always seems to save me tremendously more than if I did things myself.  He also discounts his service to us, as we submit our first crack spreadsheet of deductions and expenses, and all our receipts are organized to coincide with the spreadsheet.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-10T00:00:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9352536</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9352536" />
    <title>Comment from dohtem on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>dohtem</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>And sadly I will still be purchasing it again this year.  TurboTax gets me so much tax money back, it's worth it in the end.  I have used it for the last 3 years with great success.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:55:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9352470</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9352470" />
    <title>Comment from TheSpatulaOfLove on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>TheSpatulaOfLove</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350887" rel="nofollow">crashedpc</a>:</p>
<p>Do you use your trusty slide rule for your taxes as well?</p>
<p>When I was a young buck, I got pwned by an old engineer and his slide rule.  That was a big cup of STFU I had to swallow...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:53:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9352300</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9352300" />
    <title>Comment from Illiterati on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Illiterati</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I just got a copy of TurboTax in the mail, unsolicited but probably because I've used it in the past. I'm self-employed, so the Home &amp; Business version I need is $99.95 (plus another $10 to file w/the state). But the weird thing is that the mailing includes a coupon that gives me a $10 rebate if I don't use the disc they sent me and instead buy the exact same version in a B&amp;M store. If I'm gonna spend $100, I might as well give it to a local accountant and save myself the time/grief.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:49:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9352252</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9352252" />
    <title>Comment from citking on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>citking</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9352114" rel="nofollow">ToniRockyhorror</a>: I agree. I've been nothing but happy with them.</p>
<p>On a lark I just logged in to check on it. I forgot my password, and even getting that reset was a breeze. Their UI is nice too.</p>
<p>Now if only I could get my W-2s early for once :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:47:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9352114</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9352114" />
    <title>Comment from ToniRockyhorror on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>ToniRockyhorror</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9351843" rel="nofollow">citking</a>: I've used TaxAct for the last two years, and plan on using them again this year.  You can't beat $8 for filing everything and as long as you have your stuff organized in front of you, the whole process usually doesn't take more than an hour or so.  I rarely get spam or useless emails from them.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:44:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9352032</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9352032" />
    <title>Comment from Triterion on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Triterion</name>
        <uri>http://www.scottgreenway.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.scottgreenway.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350475" rel="nofollow">Avery</a>: California still let's you file on their website for free. I use that and TurboTax's Federal for 100% freeness.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:42:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9352027</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9352027" />
    <title>Comment from TakingItSeriously is Simon on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>TakingItSeriously is Simon</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>I go to an accountant. My taxes are somewhat complex, and I like the piece of mind that a competent CPA gives me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:42:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9351977</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9351977" />
    <title>Comment from Oranges w/ Cheese on the move on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Oranges w/ Cheese on the move</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've been using a free online service from one of them turbotax or HR Block for 3 years. Haven't paid a dime and its not got me in trouble with the IRS.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:40:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9351907</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9351907" />
    <title>Comment from Saboth on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Saboth</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've used HR Block Taxcut in the past, but I was really planning on using TurboTax this year. Why? Because for over 1 month, HR Block took down their website (from Oct-Dec), and you weren't able to access your account. They said it was to upgrade for this year's taxes, BUT you have NO access to your information during this time. I vitally needed some tax information for student loans back in October, and they wouldn't lift a finger to help me. There was no online help at all (no way to contact ANYONE about the product), and if you called them, they merely said the website was down and will be back in Dec. Now, their website says your information is available to you for 3 years after using the product, not "between these months". So I consider it false advertising with extremely poor customer service to boot.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:38:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9351843</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9351843" />
    <title>Comment from citking on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>citking</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Do your taxes for free.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.irs.gov/efile/article/0,,id=118986,00.html" rel="nofollow">FreeFile link</a> links to places that will allow you to file for free if you meet certain <a href="http://www.irs.gov/efile/article/0,,id=118993,00.html" rel="nofollow">standards</a>.</p>
<p>(As an aside, this provision was brought to you by Intuit and others, who cried "unfair!" when the federal government wanted to offer free e-filing to all taxpayers. They then proceeded to overcharge customers who thought they were filing for free. You can read <a href="http://www.accountingweb.com/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=104238&amp;d=883&amp;h=884&amp;f=882&amp;dateformat=%o%20%B%20%Y" rel="nofollow">the court case</a> brought against them for this practice of deception.)</p>
<p>In the State of Wisconsin I can file my state taxes online for free by going to their website. Many other states have the same provision.</p>
<p>Since I became a homeowner I've had to abandon my free e-filing. I've decided instead to use <a href="http://www.taxact.com/" rel="nofollow">TaxAct</a>. They were my choice for free e-filing and now I just pay like $8 for doing my own taxes. Like Intuit and H&amp;R block they'll try and fee you here and there for some things but they're not invasive and pretty easy to ignore.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:36:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9351768</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9351768" />
    <title>Comment from m4ximusprim3 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>m4ximusprim3</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350659" rel="nofollow">HIV 2 Elway Resurrected</a>: Or, if you're really down with supporting local business, just find a local tax preparer. Simple filings with just a 1040 are comparable to the price of turbotax.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:35:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9351761</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9351761" />
    <title>Comment from KStrike155 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>KStrike155</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>You can use H&amp;R Block's TaxCut Free File if your AGI is under $54k and you're under 50 years old.</p>
<p>I used that all 4 years while I was in school, and I'm just barely making it this year (I think) because I lost my job while I was in school from March to May or so.</p>
<p>Next year I won't be so lucky!  Or... wait... I will be lucky because I will be making too much and have a job?  I dunno...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:35:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9351644</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9351644" />
    <title>Comment from parkavery on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>parkavery</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350374" rel="nofollow">chris_l</a>: I don't get it either. I've always sent paper returns, as has everyone in my household. When I was living at home (this is a few years ago), my dad would buy one copy of Turbo Tax and use it to file returns for him/mom, me and my sister. Three paper returns - no e-filing. I don't think that's an egregious overuse of the software.</p>
<p>The only thing I can think is that they're charging for extra returns because of piracy, but how exactly do they track how many returns the software has run and how do they bill the additional $9.95? (If you're paper filing, you might be doing so because you're not techie enough for e-filing, so online payment is out.)</p>
<p>Too many unanswered questions...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:31:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9351486</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9351486" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I always go to a CPA. For $60 I have to sit and chat with her for an hour and I'm E-Filed. I don't know what could be easier than that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:27:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9351338</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9351338" />
    <title>Comment from RandomMutterings on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>RandomMutterings</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9351134" rel="nofollow">blackmage439</a>:</p>
<p>The reason to buy TurboTax (for me, anyhow) is that it can automatically import all investment transactions from Fidelity.com and calculate all the ridiculous details required on Schedule D.  That, alone, is worth the $90 or so it costs to avoid retyping and checking all those dates and values.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:23:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9351308</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9351308" />
    <title>Comment from UnicornMaster on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>UnicornMaster</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>So it's $60 plus another $20 or $30 for the State version? I think I paid $175 to my accountant last year and he saved me thousands of dollars. Why would anyone pay that much to do-it-yourself? That's kind of self-defeating.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:22:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9351304</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9351304" />
    <title>Comment from lawnmowerdeth on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>lawnmowerdeth</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, at least I can e-file now since I'll be paying for it in advance.  I've used Turbotax the past few years but just print and mail the forms, since I refused to pay extra.  (And I owed... So mailing it on April 15th was the best way!)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:22:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9351286</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9351286" />
    <title>Comment from Nate425 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nate425</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350933" rel="nofollow">Rhayader</a>:</p>
<p>Sure they do!  When a group of people react off the cuff and are irrational, ratings lie.  Seems like in this case, they are only seeing the rate hike and not doing the math and seeing that it's really still not that bad.</p>
<p>I don't use them though, so maybe I'm missing something.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:21:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9351143</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9351143" />
    <title>Comment from battra92 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>battra92</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>I use Turbo Tax on the web version but honestly, it's getting just as expensive to go to H&amp;R Block!</p>
<p>I have to go web based as I am not installing software and I am on Linux. (If I have to mess with WINE to do my taxes, forget it.)</p>
<p>This year I will probably switch to TaxAct.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:16:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9351134</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9351134" />
    <title>Comment from blackmage439 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>blackmage439</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Can anyone tell me a good reason to actually BUY tax prep software anymore? The only reasons I can see are:</p>
<p>1. You want to utilize the "deduction manager", if applicable.</p>
<p>2. Your state doesn't offer free e-file.</p>
<p>3. You have some odd bank accounts or whatever that free state/federal/turbo-tax applications can't handle.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:16:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9351113</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9351113" />
    <title>Comment from Mike8813 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mike8813</name>
        <uri>http://web.mac.com/mikevandyke1</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://web.mac.com/mikevandyke1">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Also of note: Turbotax has (or had, not sure if it's still available) a free web-based option for those serving in the military, located deep in the bowels of Intuit's website.</p><br />
<p>I filed with Turbotax's normal online program the last year I was in the army.(2006) Even though I was checking all the boxes that said "active military", this free option was never presented to me while using their program. Kinda pissed me off, but to their credit they did end up issuing me a refund after I called and whined about it.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:15:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9351053</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9351053" />
    <title>Comment from rpm773 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>rpm773</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>When I finally paid upwards of $90 to file with Turbotax.com a few years ago, got less automation than I had received the previous year (in the form of automatically loading brokerage transactions), and learned that a local accountant charges $100 to do it for me, I said good-bye to Turbo Tax.</p>
<p>Pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:14:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9351008</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9351008" />
    <title>Comment from choinski on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>choinski</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Governments love e-filing because its cheap and efficient, and should be free, except of course for the stupid corporates who lobby against it.</p><br />
<p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9112083" rel="nofollow">[www.npr.org]</a></p><br />
<p>I used to manage the TaxCut database. The stories I could tell....</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:12:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9350933</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9350933" />
    <title>Comment from Rhayader on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rhayader</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>So they're getting what they deserve.  Customer ratings don't lie.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:10:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9350911</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9350911" />
    <title>Comment from uglyjdkdjdodkdldkdl;d;&apos;dd;dldldel;eie8e88 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>uglyjdkdjdodkdldkdl;d;&apos;dd;dldldel;eie8e88</name>
        <uri>http://www.blandspigot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.blandspigot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I used to use turbo tax. It just hit my ceiling for not using it anymore. There is a place on the web where you can do his for free. <br />
Am I wrong?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:09:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9350887</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9350887" />
    <title>Comment from crashedpc on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>crashedpc</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c9350486" rel="nofollow">GuJiaXian</a>: Hey, nothing beats the feeling of working out something by hand by yourself. Speaking as an engineer, here.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:08:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9350886</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9350886" />
    <title>Comment from Ash78 ain&apos;t got time to bleed on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ash78 ain&apos;t got time to bleed</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9350653" rel="nofollow">YeaYuh</a>: True. I always file on time but pay the Feds on Apr 15. And claim my state refund immediately (usually early Feb).</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:08:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9350810</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9350810" />
    <title>Comment from donnie5 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>donnie5</name>
        <uri>http://www.youseedrybones.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.youseedrybones.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I for one see their pricing as good. But then again, I always efile and do not SHARE my copy with others.</p>
<p>Long live Turbo Tax! (imo, I just like it better)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:05:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9350701</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9350701" />
    <title>Comment from Mike8813 on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mike8813</name>
        <uri>http://web.mac.com/mikevandyke1</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://web.mac.com/mikevandyke1">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I was a Turbotax user for a number of years, until my first cross-country move. I've found Turbotax to be incapable of properly calculating my tax break by miles driven, whereas H&amp;R's Taxcut program handled that aspect very well. There was a difference of ~$60 between the two. It paid for itself that year.</p><br />
<p>Just something to watch out for.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:03:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9350659</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9350659" />
    <title>Comment from HIV 2 Elway on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>HIV 2 Elway</name>
        <uri>http://www.fuckyouherm.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.fuckyouherm.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Try H&amp;R Bloch's software, its comparable on price and utility, plus our local company needs all the help it can get.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:01:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9350653</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9350653" />
    <title>Comment from YeaYuh on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>YeaYuh</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9350374" rel="nofollow">chris_l</a>:</p><br />
<p>The online places I have e-filed with have allowed you to choose a date to pay the goverment if you owe. So you can still file it in February and pay in April.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:01:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9350648</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9350648" />
    <title>Comment from bostonmike on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>bostonmike</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If you do more returns, you're more likely to run into a bug in their software and call their tech support lines, which costs them money. A responsible company would welcome those calls and fix the bugs, but Intuit has another view.</p>
<p>Costco has been systematically deleting the negative reviews of TurboTax on their site about this, but they did add info about the fee into the product description.</p>
<p>Even worse, though, is that the TurboTax box says that the $9.95 price is subject to change, so they can jack it up even higher later.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:01:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9350612</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9350612" />
    <title>Comment from Ash78 ain&apos;t got time to bleed on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ash78 ain&apos;t got time to bleed</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5105492/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike#c9350486" rel="nofollow">GuJiaXian</a>: The one big advantage to software is the ability to tweak your numbers to arrive at a desired result.</p><br />
<p>I'm NOT talking about cheating here, for the record ;)</p><br />
<p>IRA contributions are a good example, since they can be made in 2009 for the 2008 tax year. Plug in the number, see the result, and decide what you want to do.</p><br />
<p>Also, I use the software to build Excel models to predict my future tax liabilities. That way, I can tweak things throughout the year to arrive as close to break-even as possible. And since TaxCut feeds my models, I'm only a year behind any changes in tax code--and can make manual changes by reading the IRS website.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T23:00:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9350486</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9350486" />
    <title>Comment from GuJiaXian on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>GuJiaXian</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>Maybe I'm odd, but I'm only 30 and I've never electronically filed. There's something oddly satisfying (yes, and masochistic) about wading through a 1040, a Schedule A, and more by hand with nothing but a pen and a calculator.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T22:56:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9350475</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9350475" />
    <title>Comment from Avery on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Avery</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>In 2004 or so my state let me e-file on their website for free. Now that service has been "discontinued" and they direct me to several pay services instead. Gee, I wonder what the incentive was to take away that feature?</p>
<p>Luckily, with Obama's commitment to bringing government services online, there could be some sunshine down the road for e-filing...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T22:56:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9350374</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9350374" />
    <title>Comment from chris_l on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>chris_l</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>They're charging you to print something? Can I ask how?</p>
<p>I can understand why they charge for e-filing. They have to put up the servers, build the infrastructure to file tens of millions of taxes, etc. But printing doesn't use ANY of that. I spend now $60 in software that basically asks me questions and based on my answers auto-populates a PDF file. There is no additional load put on Intuit whether I file 1 or 1000 tax returns if I print them. My printer, my ink, my paper and a stamp should be the only cost after buying the software to do my taxes.</p>
<p>I never e-File because I'm in no rush to pay the government money faster. It looks like they'll be even more people pirating Turbotax in 09.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T22:53:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9350346</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9350346" />
    <title>Comment from Ash78 ain&apos;t got time to bleed on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ash78 ain&apos;t got time to bleed</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>TaxCut has always been better, IMHO...but even they have been hiking rates the last few years. But I still think it's a small price to pay (~$85-$100 for software and state/federal e-filing) for the peace of mind and electronic backup copies.</p><br />
<p>A lot of people have told me that the online version is the way to go, but I have data ownership and backup fears (probably irrational).</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T22:52:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492-comment:9350238</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5105492" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/12/angry-users-trash-turbotaxs-amazon-rating-after-price-hike.html#c9350238" />
    <title>Comment from concordia on 2008-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>concordia</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Why is anyone using TurboTax after it was revealed that Intuit was resorting to <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/02/16/1549232" rel="nofollow">rootkit-esque techniques</a> to protect their software?</p>
<p>You can pull that bullshit only once before I'll never trust you again.</p>
<p>Just go online and use a web-based tool for things like this, people.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-09T22:49:43Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



