<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T15:16:24Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for FDA Warns Of Tendon-Rupturing Antibiotics</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5026557" title="FDA Warns Of Tendon-Rupturing Antibiotics" />
    <published>2008-07-18T07:28:54Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-18T18:08:31Z</updated>
    <title>FDA Warns Of Tendon-Rupturing Antibiotics</title>
    <summary>--&gt;The FDA slapped a black box warning on a group of antibiotics known as fluoroquinolones for their link to tendonitis and tendon rupture in patients. Drugs in this group include Cipro, Levaquin, Avelox, Oscient, Factive, Proquin XR, Floxin Noroxin. Ruptures associated with the drug have included the achilles tendon, thumbs, shoulder, bicep and hand. Public interest group Public Citizen has been petitioned the FDA in 1996, 2005 and 2006  to add greater warnings to the drug. Only after Public Citizen sued the FDA for not responding to the petitions were the warnings added. One patient described what happened after he was hospitalized for an infection and treated with Cipro...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Ben Popken</name>
      <uri>http://www.consumerist.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Government and Legal" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/31/2008/07/cipro.jpg"/>--><a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUKN0827990520080709">The FDA slapped a black box warning</a> on a group of antibiotics known as fluoroquinolones for their link to tendonitis and tendon rupture in patients. Drugs in this group include Cipro, Levaquin, Avelox, Oscient, Factive, Proquin XR, Floxin Noroxin. Ruptures associated with the drug have included the achilles tendon, thumbs, shoulder, bicep and hand. Public interest group Public Citizen has been petitioned the FDA in 1996, 2005 and 2006  to add greater warnings to the drug. Only after Public Citizen sued the FDA for not responding to the petitions were the warnings added. <a href="http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/features/cipro-side-effects-tendonitis-ciproxin.html">One patient described</a> what happened after he was hospitalized for an infection and treated with Cipro...</p>
]]>
      <![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In December 2007, John (not his real name) was in hospital with an infection and he was given Cipro. “Shortly after starting treatment with Cipro, I felt a "popping" in my shoulders,” he says. “At the time, I could barely move my arms and since then I have suffered constant pain; I am only now starting to improve thanks to physical therapy.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Any patient taking these drugs and experiencing tendon pain should immediately stop taking them, stop any exercise, and contact their doctor.</p>
<p><a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUKN0827990520080709">Antibiotics can harm tendons, FDA warns</a> [Reuters]</p>
]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:14420955</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c14420955" />
    <title>Comment from Anonymous on 2009-07-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anonymous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>All of these comments on Levaquin and Cipro are very interesting and disturbing.  I have taken Levaquin and Cipro more times than I can count.  I always feel pretty lousy by the time I am on them that I never accounted it to the medication (chronic UTI & bronchitis).  I started have sever shoulder pain about 2 years ago.  Dr (and myself) never related it to the meds.  I torn my calf muscle almost clear through shortly after being on Levaquin.  Finanlly got a Dr. to take my arm, shoulder pain numbness in my hands and arms seriously.  Have a torn rotor cuff (not a baseball player for about 20 years - never serious player anyway), torn trapazodial tendon, chronic neck pain and neuropathy.  The joins in my neck (C1 thru C7) are deteriating badly.  Only 40 and they haven't been able to figure out what would cause of this to happen in such a short time frame.  I have surgery to burn the nerves in my neck this coming Tuesday because I can't the pain anymore.  After we determine how much pain relief I get from that, the Dr.'s will determine if they are going to do surgery to repair the shoulder.  After reading all of this, it is hard to believe all of this could be caused because of chronic infections and the medications doctors perscribe to "make it better".  Thanks for all of the good information....  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-25T08:00:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:7070191</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c7070191" />
    <title>Comment from rickadeemus on 2008-08-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>rickadeemus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I just found 4 "rare" side effects in my family; none of which ever made it into anyone's statistics because the DOCTORS REFUSED TO BELIEVE that fq antibiotics have any side effects to report.</p><br />
<p>YOU have to report it to MEDWATCH....I know that's the FDA but if they get enough reports of ADRS to FQs then they can't deny these drugs are doing what they do. Well...they can still deny it, but it just gets a little harder.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-06T08:35:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6896241</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6896241" />
    <title>Comment from radams257 on 2008-07-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>radams257</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I think having a black box warning should just be the first step in a total re-education program for doctors. When I was given ciprofloxin in January 2008 for a sinus infection, I had terrible side effects - tendon pain and stiffness being only the tip of the iceberg - which I promptly reported to my treating physician only to be told it couldn't be caused by the meds. When I pointed out that the warning sheet from the pharmacy said tendon issues were a side effect and to immediately report this to my treating physician, the doctor just shrugged it off and told me my problems were not caused by the cipro. I am sure if I went back to that same doctor today with my continued tendon pains and tendon stiffness and with a copy of the new black box warning, he wold still act as if this fq medication could never cause my issues. It is ridiculous how trained professionals act so completely clueless or brainwashed - you can choose which they are.</p><br />
<p>Also, everyone keeps going on and on about how "rare" the side effects are. What a complete distortion of the truth. First, anyone who browses the internet will find several sites where fluoroquinolone victims have been posting for years, and these sites contain thousands of members with allegedly "rare" side effects. Second, we also must factor in that doctors don't report the side effects of these drugs. I personally know that my doctor didn't report my side effects when I went back to him, and I have since discovered that several members of my immediate family have sustained "rare" injuries that were never reported to the FDA while they just happened to be taking fluoroquinolones: my paternal granfather had an achilles tendon rupture 4-5 years ago while taking levaquin; my maternal grandmother had severe central nervous system issues as well as debilitating deteoriation of her legs muscles after taking a course of levaquin and then avelox several years ago; and my mother-in-law had central nervous system issues with levaquin after 1 pill and refuses to take another fluoroquinolone. Wow I just found 4 "rare" side effects in my family; none of which ever made it into anyone's statistics because the DOCTORS REFUSED TO BELIEVE that fq antibiotics have any side effects to report.</p><br />
<p>So while I think the black box warning is a good baby step, I think the FDA has lots to do to straighten this fluoroquinolone nightmare up, because it is a nightmare that no one seems to want to admit is real nor wants to deal with.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-26T06:17:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6876318</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6876318" />
    <title>Comment from RochelleGracchus on 2008-07-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>RochelleGracchus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Though I had posted this on other sites dealing with this issue, it is  still 
relevant to the discussion at hand and I would hope the host of this site  
would not take offense at me repeating it here:
 
In addition to the recent "Black Box Warnings" as well as the European  "Dear 
Doctor" issued by Bayer overseas back in February 2008 concerning Avelox,  
the European Medicines Agency has moved to severely restrict the use of Avelox  
(moxifloxacin), to wit:
 
FRANKFURT, July 24 (Reuters) - The European Medicines Agency has  recommended 
limiting the use of oral moxifloxacin-containing medicines after  finalizing 
a review of the safety of the antibiotics, the agency said on  Thursday.
 
The European body (EMEA) said it had concluded that these drugs should only  
be prescribed for acute bacterial sinusitis, acute exacerbation of chronic  
bronchitis and community-acquired pneumonia when other antibiotics cannot be  
used or have failed.
 
"The agency also recommended strengthening the warnings for oral  
moxifloxacin medicines," it said in a statement.
 
Moxifloxacin, a fluoroquinolone antibiotic, is marketed by Bayer (BAYG.DE:  
Quote, Profile, Research) under its brand Avelox.
 
At its July 2008 meeting, the agency's Committee for Medicinal Products for  
Human Use (CHMP) concluded that the benefits of oral moxifloxacin medicines  
continued to outweigh its risks.
 
However, due to safety concerns, mainly related to an increased risk of  
adverse hepatic reactions, it recommended restricting their use in these  
indications.
 
The CHMP opinion will now be forwarded to the European Commission to apply  
to all oral moxifloxacin-containing medicines authorized in the European  Union.
 
Responding to the recommendation, Bayer said the review confirmed the  
positive benefit-risk profile of the drug.
 
"We would welcome an EMEA assessment of other antibiotics used for  treatment 
of these infections in a similar fashion in the interest of patient  care," 
said Kemal Malik, a member of Bayer HealthCare executive committee and  chief 
medical officer.
 
_http://uk.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUKL2453307820080724_ 
(http://uk.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUKL2453307820080724) 
 
Black Box Warnings, Dear Doctor Letters, restrictions place on the use of  
Avelox, thousands of patients responding to these articles claiming severe  
injuries from this class, hundreds if not thousands of adverse drug reaction  
forums with tens of thousands of members world wide, as well as more than fifty  
percent of these drugs removed from clinical practice, and last but not least  
the fact that Nalidixic Acid, upon which all these drugs are based is a listed 
 cancer causing agent, I dare to ask: are we still to believe the following  
comment which can be found at the end of just about any article written about  
this class?
 
'The fluoroquinolones as a class are generally well tolerated; most adverse  
effects are mild in severity, self-limited, and rarely result in treatment  
discontinuation...'
 
Or are we to continue wonder if we are the only ones who have bothered to  do 
any research on this class in the past twenty six years. For surely who ever  
would make such a claim has not.
 
â€śRepeat a lie a thousand times and it becomes the truth ...â€ť - usually  
credited to Dr Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Minister of the Third Reich. I now  
credit it to those medical researchers who continue to state how safe and  
effective this class of chemotherapuetic agents are. For they have repeated this  
lie a thousand times a thousand times. Rather odd coincident that they are both  
(Goebbels, and these medical researchers who state such blatant lies) members 
of  the medical community.

<p></p>

<p><br />
**************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for <br />
FanHouse Fantasy Football today.      <br />
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)<br />
</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-25T07:29:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6871053</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6871053" />
    <title>Comment from ciprovictimalso on 2008-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>ciprovictimalso</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I don't blame the doctors for what happened to my husband. He's disabled now after the last 3 ruptures he had involving both his arms in 2005 after taking CiproXR. This started happening around 11 months after taking it. That was all he had left to work with. Both his legs were already badly damaged from when he took Cipro in 1998. He started having ruptures in both his legs around 11 months after taking Cipro 500mg. The ruptures came with no warning &amp; also included the quadriceps &amp; quadriceps muscle. A quadriceps muscle tore in half midway up his thigh. That's just the tendon &amp; muscle damage. He also has neuropathies in his arms &amp; legs among other things. He had 6 ruptures &amp; not a single doctor knew why. That "rare occurrence of tendinitis &amp; tendon ruptures can occur while or AFTER taking these medicines" probably had a lot to do with why the doctors didn't know. Who knew "AFTER" means that long. Someone asked "How does this(ruptures) happen?". I'm not a doctor. I have read through so many of my husband's medical records. There was mention of lack of blood in his tissue in a report after an operation he had. It was important enough that the doctor told me about it after the operation. My husband is a former Marine. He kept in shape over the years. He was in his early 40's when he took Cipro in 1998. He worked out with a world class weight lifter in the military. He once was so strong. When his legs were badly damaged, he told me that as long as he had 2 good arms, he was going to make a living for his family. The second round of Cipro took that away. Can you imagine how he must feel now because his little grandchildren are stronger than he is. I have been told that the benefits outweigh the risks. What about his life? Why isn't someone held responsible for this? If I made a product &amp; sold it to people &amp; some got hurt, I would be held responsibly. Why aren't they?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-25T02:30:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6870304</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6870304" />
    <title>Comment from rickadeemus on 2008-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>rickadeemus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I took avelox 3 plus years ago for a sinus infection, and three months later a barrage of ADRs hit me. Not connecting my condition to the use of a fluoroquinolone, I went around the med. establishment for 5 1/2 months looking for answers, none of which were forthcoming. The med. establishment does not look for ADRs to drugs in their diagnostic paradigm. And because they don't, alot of people are being mis-diagnosed. ADRs to FQs mimic alot of conditions; sojgrens, arthritis, diabetes; the list goes on.</p><br />
<p>These drugs are being abused by the medical community; they should not be given as a first line of defense against things like sinus infection or UTI.<br />Also, doctors are not aware that they should not mix FQs with NSAIDS or steroids. God forbid we should tell anybody that and risk the patient not wanting the drug! The profit margin is the bottom line here, not the patients' health and well-being. The FDA shares the responsibility for this negligence.</p><br />
<p>The recent black box warning for tendon tears is very inadequate. The warning should be for ALL the FQ ADRsâ€¦.neurological, GI, musculoskeletal, endocrinal, renal, liver, heart problems, etc.</p><br />
<p>The other notable thing about these drugs is that the ADRs to FQs are often permanent. The warning to discontinue use and call your doctor is futile in that the damage has already been done by the time you get an ADR. Some people recover most of their lives back but it sometimes takes years.</p><br />
<p>It's time to get the word out regarding the danger of fluroquinolones before more people's lives are ruined.</p><br />
<p>Rick</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-25T02:05:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6859161</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6859161" />
    <title>Comment from ciprovictimalso on 2008-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>ciprovictimalso</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I have a big problem with the warnings on quinolones. The part of the warning that refers to "rare occurrence of tendonitis &amp; tendon ruptures can occur while or AFTER taking these medicines" really needs more clarity. My husband took Cipro in 1998. Around 11 months "after" he started having ruptures to occur in his legs in 1999. He had another rupture in 2000 &amp; 1 more in 2001. I notice the quadriceps isn't mentioned as 1 of those listed in the warning. He also had a quadriceps muscle to tear apart in the center of his thigh. I see no mention of muscles rupturing but they certainly can. The rupturing seemed to have stopped for several years. In 2005, they started again mysteriously. This time he had 3 ruptures involving both his arms and the pain became worse in his legs. It just so happens these ruptures started occurring around 11 months "after" he took CiproXr. This was the second time he had ever taken a Cipro medicine. I have taken him to see almost a dozen different doctors since the ruptures first began. None of them had any idea what was causing it. I can understand why. Who knows that "AFTER" means more than a few weeks or months after taking these medicines. Then there is the word "RARE". How do you know it's that rare when almost a dozen different doctors couldn't connect 6 ruptures in 1 man to quinolones? He was in his early 40's when he took Cipro in 1998. The warning says that people over 60 are more at risks. How about listing the age group that reported the most tendon ruptures after taking these meds. I don't believe they were over 60 years old. The warnings need to be more specific so doctors can recognize these injuries when they occur.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-24T20:11:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6834507</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6834507" />
    <title>Comment from RochelleGracchus on 2008-07-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>RochelleGracchus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>phex,
 
If you were to review the NDA's for these drugs as well as the text of the  
advisory meetings you will find that the above was not unique at all.  But  
rather the rule.  For instance disfiguring rashes is associated with  Factive.  
In fact the advisory board members found this to be a hoot, and  were literally 
laughing out loud about it.  Factive is now scarring people  for life.  As I 
had posted earlier back in '96 the advisory committee  discussed how these 
drugs would crippled children.  But pediatric studies  took place anyhow, and 
crippled children.  Same with tequin and  hypo-hyperglycemia.  Discussed, ignored 
then approved.  Tequin has  been removed as a result of fatal 
hypo-hyperglycemia.  On and on we  go.  The vitro efficacy studies presented with the NDA for 
levaquin were  not even for levaquin, but rather a different drug.  Approved 
anyhow by the  FDA.  The corruption and malfeasance concerning this class in 
particular is  staggering.  Hence the reason we do not see fair warnings.  
Something  is horribly wrong here when the FDA punishes those who raise the issue 
of safety  and reward those who look the other way.
 
 

<p></p>

<p>**************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for <br />
FanHouse Fantasy Football today.      <br />
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)<br />
</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-23T17:39:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6824065</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6824065" />
    <title>Comment from mrearly2 on 2008-07-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>mrearly2</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The drug company must have been threatened with law suits, otherwise the FDA wouldn't bother with a warning. They normally help the drug companies poison people.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-23T01:22:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6810495</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6810495" />
    <title>Comment from Phexerian on 2008-07-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phexerian</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Interesting transcript.  It is a very interesting read.  Looks like the FDA should not have approved AVELOX for acute sinusitis infections as they are very much short term and generally easy to cure.  The others, however, I could see as very complex infections in a hospital setting.</p>
<p>Regarding QT elongation which I am somewhat familiar with.  Standard practice, from what I have seen in pharmacy, is that we do not generally worry about QT elongation unless the patient has cardio problems or the drug interacts with another, like TCA (tricyclic Antidepressants).  However, when we do find then, we always and I do mean always, call the physician and request that he change it to another drug.  This is taken from rxlist.com ...</p>
<p>"No cardiovascular morbidity or mortality attributable to QTc prolongation occurred with moxifloxacin treatment in over 9,200 patients in controlled clinical studies, including 223 patients who were hypokalemic at the start of treatment, and there was no increase in mortality in over 18,000 moxifloxacin tablet treated patients in a post-marketing observational study in which ECGs were not performed."</p>
<p>However, I have not looked up these studies myself.  These studies may be funded directly from the drug company which gives me a HUGE RED FLAG as towards bias.  However, note that one of these huge studies was done POST marketing which means it came out after it was approved by the FDA.  I can only assume that in its clinical studies, it was looked at, but not to a very thorough extent as stated by the physicians in your post.</p>
<p>I will probably skim over that hearing a good bit more and see what else is in it.  Nice find.</p>
<p>-Phex<br />
-3rd Year PharmD / MBA Candidate</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-22T09:02:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6807372</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6807372" />
    <title>Comment from RochelleGracchus on 2008-07-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>RochelleGracchus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>My comments were not meant to be argumentative either.     I am treating you 
in the same manner as any one else who doesn't have a  clue.      I take no 
offense in debating this with you,  and in fact respect the fact that you are 
even bothering to take the time to  discuss this further.     I hate the way 
this site makes  this text appear, but I am powerless to do anything about it so 
please bare with  me here.     You stated that: I am willing to believe it but 
 there has to be data to support it that is of quality.      OK, I agree, 
that is a reasonable request.     So where does  one find such data when nobody 
is compiling it?     You  cannot do a meta analysis on something that is 
grossly under  reported.     The data is simply not there to work with for  that 
very reason.     You have a clinical study, three  patients blow a tendon, and 
the study makes NO mention of this  fact.     So what is there to analysis when 
this takes  place.     One could state a risk factor of say one in a  
thousand.     But this is meaningless when 900 additional  cases were never reported 
to begin with.     The 40  citations was simply being used to stress the point 
that this has been reported  since 1982.     One citation per year more or  
less.     For the FDA to act as if this was something new is mind  boggling when 
it has been reported in the medical journals for twenty six  years.  For a 
physician to claim to have NO knowledge of this reaction  simply does not fly in 
the face of what is out there.   
 
So as you can see from the following, what is the use of pursuing the  
suggestions you are making?   
 
The applicant selected a HIGHER dose than that approved for clarithromycin  
for the treatment of CAP.    It should also be noted that  clarithromycin is 
NOT approved for CAP due to H. influenzae and therefore may  not be the best 
comparator for the purpose of assessing moxifloxacin efficacy in  infections 
caused by this agent.     The use of this higher  dose of clarithromycin for CAP 
CANNOT be used to substantiate ANY potential  claims of an enhanced safety 
profile for moxifloxacin compared with  clarithromycin.
 
 
 
The MO reviewed the narratives for patients with serious AES and found that  
there were two patients who developed empyemas and two who developed worsening 
 of pneumonia whose serious AEs were considered by the applicant to be 
UNRELATED  to study drug.    Review of these cases suggested that all three of  
these patientsâ€™s deteriorations WERE related to the study drug.  The MO was  
UNABLE to determine why the applicant considered some clinical deteriorationâ€™s  
attributable and others unattributable to the study drug.    
 
The clinical efficacy of moxifloxacin daily for 10 days observed in this  
study was comparable to what has been observed with this regime in other studies  
of  CAP.  This study DID NOT provide sufficient to support a claim for  
clinical efficacy of moxifloxacin in the treatment of pneumonia due to S. aureus  
or K. pneumoniae.     The adverse event and laboratory  abnormalities profile 
seen for moxifloxacin in this study was similar to what  was reported from 
other studies.    
 
The applicant presented additional data regarding clinical efficacy in the  
per protocol population at follow up.     Cure rates for  each treatment group 
were 18/33 (54.6%) for moxifloxacin 200 m.g.  19/35  (54.3%) for moxifloxacin 
400 m.g. and 61/104 (66.7%) for amoxicillin 500 mg  tid.      This study DID 
NOT distinguish between the  clinical efficacy of moxifloxacin 200 mg and 
moxifloxacin 400 mg for the  treatment of CAP.  It SUGGESTED that moxifloxacin may 
be similar to  amoxicillin 500 mg tid in the treatment of this infection. (NOT 
 SUPERIOR)    
 
Hence, the conflicting data presented in the NDA do(es) NOT convincingly  
support approval of the 7 day moxifloxacin regimen for acute sinusitis  
indication.
 
Moxifloxacin clearly prolongs QTc intervals in a concentration-related  
manner and as a result puts patients at risk for developing malignant  arrhytmias.  
The data provided by the sponsor DID NOT  include all patients treated, about 
90% were excluded, and ECG  were obtained as late as 6 hours after the drug 
intake (peak concentration is  about 2 hours).     So the sponsorâ€™s argument 
that  moxifloxacin is safe because it only causes a small increase in QTc is  
flawed.     What was shown in the database is that there are  examples of 
patients on moxifloxacin with changes in QTc intervals greater than  80 msec over 
baseline with resulting QTc intervals above 500 msec.   
 
In summary, it is hard to justify approving this agent as a first  line 
therapy for non-life threatening infections in which there are a plethora  of 
treatment choices.  Moxifloxacin raises the QTc  interval in a concentration 
related manner and therefore has the potential to  cause malignant ventricular 
arrhythmias, including torsade de pointes, and  death.     (were do you see this 
stated in the product  label in a black box?)
 
I recommend approval of moxifloxacin for the treatment of  CAP due to S. 
pneumoniae, H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae  and Chlamydia 
pneumoniae.
 
In conclusion the MO recommends approval of the ten day  treatment regimen of 
moxifloxacin for the treatment of acute sinusitisâ€¦drug  related adverse 
events occurred more commonly in the moxifloxacin group (37%)  compared to the 
control groupâ€¦however the elevation of the prothrombin time,  cholesterol and 
chloride occurred more frequently in the moxifloxacin treatment  arm.    
 
The FDA approved this drug even thought the studies failed to show any  
advantage over the comprators presented, as well as stating that: Moxifloxacin  
raises the QTc interval in a concentration related manner and therefore has the  
potential to cause malignant ventricular arrhythmias, including torsade de  
pointes, and death.
 
Even though all of these issues were raised by the advisory committee  before 
hand:
 
Excerpts from the ANTI-INFECTIVE DRUGS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 67TH MEETING  
(THURSDAY, OCTOBER 21, 1999) in which the severe adverse reactions to  moxifloxacin 
were discussed.
 
The following is the text of pertinent portion of this meeting:
QUOTES  FROM THE HEARING: 
Committee Doc A: I'm going to say no, and I'm going to say  no because of the 
following reasons. I think when the drug is marketed, no  matter what kind of 
warning you put in it, it's going to be used in  substantially different ways 
than it's been used in the trials. And, I think  that this is exactly the 
kind of place that you get into trouble with, when a  drug is approved, it's 
carefully studied in a trial, people are carefully  excluded who have prolonged QT 
intervals, are carefully excluded who are on  drugs that can be additive with 
it in terms of the effect, and it's used for a  very short interval of time, 
and so it's not clear -- I am absolutely convinced  that the drug will be used 
differently once it's marketed frequently. And, I  think there are enough 
things that really haven't been answered. I don't know if  the drug effects 
potassium and magnesium excretion, and whether it somehow is  additive with other 
drugs that produces increased loss of electrolytes through  the kidneys, 
because that has not been looked at. It seems to possibly cause or  increase the 
incidence of atrial fibrillation, and we don't have real drug  levels from real 
patients correlated with QT times.  So, I don't know, I'm  just somewhat 
concerned. The other issue with safety, obviously, is the risk  benefit ratio, and 
I'm not sure I see what this drug adds to drugs that we  already have that's so 
unique that we need this drug, that we absolutely need  it, and we need it 
now for some indication. There are other drugs that you can  use. They may have 
the same problem, but given that they haven't been studied in  this way, I 
don't know that's the case.------
COMMITTEE DOC B: Well, I guess  I'd have to say no, the data on safety are 
not convincing. It seems to me, based  on the discussion, that the QT facts are 
clinically relevant, steady state  concentrations needs to be studied further. 
In addition, the concern about  people using the drug for longer than 12 
days, I don't think we have enough  information on that, and I believe that that 
may occur, even though that  probably would not necessarily be what we would 
recommend. The other concerns  about other drugs that might prolong the QT 
interval, the problems with  hypokalemia, the problems with death after the drug 
was discontinued, and,  again, the age-old problem, the use of this drug in 
children, I think we need to  study the drug and the pharmacokinetics, and we also 
need to study the safety in  the pediatric population. We need data on that, 
because although it was not  studied, and although it won't be approved for chi
ldren, I'm afraid it will be  used in this population and I'm concerned about 
that.----
COMMITTEE DOC C: I  was prepared to vote for safety with an appropriate 
change in the label, but the  two that have talked about all the things that we 
don't know about, you know,  the behavior of this drug have swayed me. I think I 
shall have to vote against,  I don't believe we know enough yet about  the 
safety because of the cardiac  problems.----
Guest Expert Doc A: I was -- I thought Dr. A's summary captured  a lot of my 
concerns, and I think that on balance we don't know enough now to  conclude 
that it's safe.  I think the other thing that gives me pause is  the fact that 
this is a drug that may be very widely used, so even if the  estimates of one 
to two percent, which I think are very conservative, of  meaningful QT 
prolongations are correct, that might be tens or hundreds of  thousands of people who 
would experience those. So, it seems to me that knowing  more would be 
necessary for me to say yes, so I think if I had a vote I would  probably say no for 
now.----
ACTING CHAIRMAN : And finally, I'd like to make  sure that there are no other 
comments that the voting members of the committee  would like to make.----
Committee Doc D: I just have one comment, which also  echoes a little bit 
what Dr. A said, which is that although I think this drug is  safe, I think we 
also have to consider the other drugs, other antibiotics that  are out there, 
and whether the risk benefit ratio is as good as other  comparators or similar 
drugs that are there. And, I think in balance this  probably doesn't add a 
terrible -- it doesn't add very much to the antibiotic  armamentarium that we 
currently have.------
Dr. A: I'm a little confused by  what we are voting on. I mean, my answer is 
still no from before. I agree that  if the drug is approved that it has to 
have a warning label similar to what's  been described. I also wonder whether it 
shouldn't include something about the  possibility that it may induce atrial 
fibrillation in patients, particularly,  patients at high risk for that 
arrhythmia. And, you know, whether it should  contain information about the drug 
effect on QT may be aggravated by hypokalemia  and, therefore, potassium levels, 
particularly, on patients who are on drugs  that cause hypokalemia should be 
monitored, or at least baseline checked.   I mean, I think there may be other 
things that need to go into the warning label  to caution people. I would also 
suggest that it say something about the fact  that in the trials prolonged use 
of the drug, in terms of its cardiovascular  safety, were not assessed, you 
know, by giving it longer than stated You know,  in terms of the other drugs 
that have been approved, I guess one of the problems  that the pharmaceutical 
company has here is that, you know, they were, perhaps,  the first to come along, 
take a drug with this issue and evaluate it so  thoroughly, so it's probably, 
you know, raised as many questions as it has  answered.---- 
DR. A: Do you have data on how this drug affects potassium and  magnesium 
excretion from the kidney? The second question, in terms of the  accumulation of 
this drug in tissues, over what time period does that occur?  What is the half 
life in tissues? Is it likely if people use the drug for longer  periods of 
time that the drug would continue to accumulate and levels would  continue to 
rise in tissues?----
DRUG CO. DOC: We do have some tissue  accumulation studies in Phase I and 
Phase II and in small numbers of patients  multiple time points. We also have a 
dialysis and skeletal muscle study. Most of  those studies, however, were done 
with a single dose administration of very  short term.  There is, as Dr. 
__showed you, considerable accumulation in  pulmonary tissues which is helpful in 
this sort of setting. Our data for  skeletal muscle is that the concentrations 
reached in skeletal muscle are about  80 percent of the plasma concentrations 
of the drug. We don't have data to  address the possibility of long-term 
accumulation in tissues but for skeletal  muscle the ratios are less than plasma 
concentrations.-----
 
So less than 8 weeks after this hearing where all these issues were raised,  
as well as all of the issues noted within the NDA, it was approved ANYHOW.
_http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/99/transcpt/3558t2.rtf_ 
(http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/99/transcpt/3558t2.rtf)  
 
 
 

<p></p>

<p>**************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for <br />
FanHouse Fantasy Football today.      <br />
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)<br />
</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-22T04:43:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6792747</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6792747" />
    <title>Comment from lableslea on 2008-07-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>lableslea</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>My name is Leslea and I am a Clinical Laboratory Manager, have been a Medical Technologist for almost 30 years. I am very well respected by the medical staff at my facility because if I bring up a subject, perhaps a laboratory protocol that I want to put into place or changed, I have done my homework on the subject. <br />With that in mind, I want to urge physicians to take heed to the fact that fluoroquinolones are not safe for a very large segment of the population. There are literally thousands and thousands of people whose lives are forever changed because of the quinolones. <br />I know that most, if not all, facilities with microbiology departments put out an antibiogram, at least annually, for the medical staff to reference. Please use your antibiograms to pick the least toxic and most effective antibiotic for your patient. <br />Use the quinolone class only as a last resort, after other antibiotics have failed or the patient will expire if they aren't used. Using the quinolones routinely just doesn't make sense when other antibiotics will work. Keep in mind if this class of antibiotics continues to be used so nonchalantly they will become ineffective due to bacteria developing resistance to them. <br />I have personally experienced multiple system adr's to the quinolones, and know a multitude of people like me. That is why I am writing this, I want to prevent the number of people that are damaged by quinolones from growing exponentially.<br />The adr's to the quinolones are grossly under reported due to the fact that a lot of reactions aren't recognized, but are diagnosed as an unrelated problem. If the number of adr's to quinolones were accurately reported to the medical community, no physician would ever routinely prescribe quinolones again, unless he was some sort of sadist. <br />My motivation for writing this is honorable, our term would be risk management in the medical community, for the layperson it would be a passionate desire to prevent others from suffering like I am. <br />Just in case you are wondering, my first reaction to a quinolone caused damage to my tendons particularly my left knee. The tendons were so weak that my knee dislocated 6 times over a 7 month period, I probably should have been in a wheel chair, but I needed to work. I have a permanent baker's cyst in that knee. The tendonitis was so painful that walking was more like hobbling. <br />My second reaction made my first reaction seem like a walk in the park. When I mentioned multiple systems earlier, I meant CNS, muscular, skeletal, soft tissues and connective tissue damage. Four and a half years post two doses of Avelox, I still have a multitude of symptoms, some that are not going to resolve. Although I am in severe unrelenting pain, I consider the worst part of my reaction to be the CNS or brain damage. <br />I have debilitating depression, which I never had prior to this. But the thing that takes the cake is the following: I am sure you can imagine that I am or actually was above average in intelligence, Avelox has destroyed my short term memory and has made me struggle to find simple everyday words when carrying on a conversation. My nickname used to be "The Steel Trap" because I never forgot anything and could recall verbatim conversations no matter how long or short the amount of time that had elapsed. My memory was what is called photographic in nature. You might be tempted to say, well you are getting older, well I don't believe that CNS changes due to aging happen overnight unless there is a stroke involved. That, and the fact that I am not alone with this reaction, speaks very loudly to the truth of the matter. <br />I will quickly list the other damage I am dealing with; peripheral neuropathy, myofascial damage in my right hip that has lead to permanent gluteus median adhesions after tearing. I have chronic muscle spasms and knots in my right hip and shoulder, this is the cause of the severe unrelenting pain, the shoulder knots and spasms lead to horrible tension headaches. I also have to take Valtrex to keep shingles at bay, another wonderful symptom of the nerve damage. My tendons and ligaments in my right knee are tender to the touch and painful, my vision is altered due to floaters and blurring, luckily laboratories are notoriously noisy so I don't notice the tinnitus too much. I could go on and on, but you get the picture. By the way, I was a healthy active person prior to this reaction, I was 47 at the time and most people would guess my age at 35 because of my personality, strength and agility, they were always shocked to find out how old I was. <br />Please help me in preventing any other healthy individuals from experiencing this nightmare. <br />I also challenge you to do your own research into the real picture of this class of antibiotics, quit taking the word of the FDA or pharmaceutical companies, they have an agenda, but it is less than honorable. You can start by going to www.fluoroquinolones.org . <br />Thank you for your time.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-21T18:09:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6792423</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6792423" />
    <title>Comment from Phexerian on 2008-07-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phexerian</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>1) Citing 40+ different research cases is ludicrous.  Expecting me to read and sift through 40 of them is even more ludicrous.  That is a job for fqresearch.org or the AMA.  When I said cite something, I mean cite something with substance.  Where is the retrospective meta analysis?  I see there were a couple of studies with a good population number.  Not all of those research studies are going to be considered strong.<br />
2) Many of the older studies that were published over 20 years ago can be found online for free.  Don't need PubMed to get to them.  There are some people like me that do have access to PubMed.  However, if you really want people to look into this more, you need to present the case in an easier manner.  Don't give the public 500+ cases and say "Here you go, sift through it".  Give them the good meta analysis and retrospective studies with good population numbers with sound statistics methodology.<br />
3) "author or the drug company that does not want such information to be readily available."  It is standard practice for ALL medical research to be done this way generally.  I guess one could argue what you said.<br />
4) "This is NO different than what would be required of you on pubmed."  With PubMed you can narrow the fields down much quicker and easier.  Once again, don't expect the reader to do all the sifting for you.  Present your argument in a cleaner manner.<br />
5) "If the majority of these articles are to be considered 'crap' then I would imagine they fail to support the propaganda presented by the drug companies in your view."  Then one could argue they also fail to support your claim as well.<br />
6)  "You are scaring me that a college kid can't figure out how to click on a link and then follow it to the list of citations."  There was no need for the ad hominem attack.  It's not college btw, its professional graduate school.  Please note, that I am working on my Doctorate in Pharmacy and these studies and this research I deal with on a daily basis in class.  Once again, when we get studies, we only get the ones that are to be considered relevant by the medical community, then we weigh the options.  Flooding the page with 40+ citations again, is still requiring the reader to sift through all the crap.  Just post the most relevant studies or at least what you think are the most relevant studies.  40+ if them is quite a lot to consider to be statistically relevant.<br />
7) "I would find that to be rather odd considering how rare you seem to believe these reactions are."  What I believe is irrelevant.  I have to go with the data that the medical community thinks is worthwhile.  We do have standards and rules as to studies, how they are done, etc...<br />
8)  "But you stated that you consider such reports to be unsubstantiated. So what goes does it do to report them if the medical community considers them to be suspect?"  Case Reports are unsubstantial is what I said.  They have no statistical backing.  They are there to open up the discussion and door for more research and statistical analysis.  A Retrospective metaanalysis is not unsubstantial.  A strong study is substantial.<br />
9)  "Clinical studies are hardly to be considered to be any more valid."  Clincal studies, unlike Case Reports, use statistical methods to determine outcomes.  So no, you are wrong.  They are much more valid, however, only to the extent of how well they are done.<br />
10)  "I beg to differ here. I have well over 400 citations from 1962-2005." 400 citations does not mean they are all well designed research studies.  I'm sure many of them are case reports.  Once again, make the literature easy to locate for the point you are making.</p>
<p>Once again, you tell me that the reader, me, should sift through all this data.  I can't make an informed idea about your argument without GOOD supporting data and quite frankly, I cannot sift through all that data myself.  It is unreasonable to expect one to do that.  This is why, when you argue a point, quality is worth more than quantity.  Find the good studies and use those for your arguments.  If you aren't sure which ones are good, see if you can find a friend who knows something about it to help you out or take a design outcomes statistics class which shows you how to do that.</p>
<p>Also, present your case to the AMA and the other groups that design the guidelines for medical practice.  Arguing to the FDA is good as well, but it can only get you so far.  The guildelines being changed is what will change medical practice and help people.  If what you are stating is true and the rate is higher, by putting other safer antibiotics in at first line treatment instead of fluoroquinolones will help save people.</p>
<p>I hope you realize that I am not being negative to your cause. I am very critical though when it comes to statistics and medical research.  It needs to be very transparent.  I am treating you with the same rigor that I would treat a drug rep or a drug company so don't think I am singling you out.  I am willing to believe it but there has to be data to support it that is of quality.  And honestly, I don't like drug companies, and I like finding stuff like this that drug companies hide when they try to put their drug on the market, but once again, the data has to be of quality and easy to access.  Good luck to you.</p>
<p>-Phex<br />
-3rd Year PharmD / MBA Candidate</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-21T17:13:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6791826</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6791826" />
    <title>Comment from RochelleGracchus on 2008-07-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>RochelleGracchus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>As you can see, trying to include citations just makes a miserable mess of  
the post.  Rather than complain about the fqresearch website, (you must of  
failed to notice the sign that asked you to forgive the mess it currently is in  
do to the fact that it is undergoing an extensive remodeling), take a moment 
and  consider why it would even be needed.  As you stated the amount of data  
found there is overwhelming.  I would find that to be rather odd  considering 
how rare you seem to believe these reactions are.
 
I must admit that I am not that familiar with the tendon problem side  effect 
of the drug but am only familiar from rxlist.com that the rate of  occurrence 
is less than 1%. This is what was reported to the FDA in clinical  trials I 
would assume.  This number could change after more of a population  starts to 
take the drug, and thus the reason for post market research and  surveillance. 
 
But you stated that you consider such reports to be unsubstantiated.   So 
what goes does it do to report them if the medical community considers them  to 
be suspect?  A classic catch 22.  Clinical studies are hardly to be  considered 
to be any more valid.  Almost all of these adverse events we are  discussing 
indeed did presented during the trials but the drug company doctors  stated 
that they were NOT related to the study drug even though there was no  other 
logical explanation.  Even those that had been reported upon in the  medical 
journals.  Still not related to the drug they would state.  In  one trial three 
patients had a rupture.  This fact was EXCLUDED from the  final report.
 
Since this site here does such a horrible job butchering comments sent via  
email (still can't log in even though I am registered here) I will provide you 
a  link to a list of the citations being used on that site (which will open in 
 Word) and you can do a bit of research yourself.
 
There are are only a handful of actual research articles on tendon effects.  
This archive of research info is mostly crap. Half of the articles aren't  
completely there, and only give a brief overview.  I beg to differ  here.  I have 
well over 400 citations from 1962-2005.  Due to medical  complications I am 
about three years behind in adding data to the site.   The hard copies fill 
four file cabinets.  The reason you do not have access  to the full articles is 
beyond my control.  They are not available to the  public without having to 
purchase them.  So you take 11,497 medical journal  entries (1982-2004) found on 
Pub Med  
 
_http://tinyurl.com/6saopd_ (http://tinyurl.com/6saopd)  
then factor in that a couple of thousand of these articles will cost  
anywhere from $50-$150 a piece and the cost becomes prohibited.  Other  articles are 
so old that the originals cannot even be found.  This isn't  the Library of 
Congress my friend.  It is a website put together by one  victim of the 
horrendous damage caused by these drugs who is doing the best he  can with what he has 
to work with.  And as I state in a previous post it is  rather straight 
forward to use.  Three clicks of your mouse is all it  takes.  Couldn't get any 
easier than that.

<p> <br />
TENDONS: _http://tinyurl.com/6xk3mn_ (http://tinyurl.com/6xk3mn) <br />
Tendon Ruptures / Animal Studies: _http://tinyurl.com/5g3zgg_ <br />
(http://tinyurl.com/5g3zgg) <br />
DNA DAMAGE: _http://tinyurl.com/6dlg5d_ (http://tinyurl.com/6dlg5d) <br />
IRREVERSILBE PERIPHERAL NUEROPATHY: _http://tinyurl.com/6o4wbt_ <br />
(http://tinyurl.com/6o4wbt) <br />
VISION DAMAGE: _http://tinyurl.com/6684yh_ (http://tinyurl.com/6684yh) <br />
CARDIAC EVENTS: _http://tinyurl.com/5engvh_ (http://tinyurl.com/5engvh) <br />
Rhabdomyolysis: _http://tinyurl.com/6ghdbb_ (http://tinyurl.com/6ghdbb) <br />
LIVER DAMAGE: _http://tinyurl.com/6brdyg_ (http://tinyurl.com/6brdyg) <br />
KIDNEY  DAMAGE: _http://tinyurl.com/6927yh_ (http://tinyurl.com/6927yh) <br />
PROSTATITIS: _http://tinyurl.com/6b9583_ (http://tinyurl.com/6b9583) <br />
VASCULITIS: _http://tinyurl.com/6ffoug_ (http://tinyurl.com/6ffoug) <br />
TENS, SJS, Phototoxicity and Skin Damage: _http://tinyurl.com/5fda6p_ <br />
(http://tinyurl.com/5fda6p) <br />
Toxic Psychosis:   _http://tinyurl.com/65v5sv_ (http://tinyurl.com/65v5sv) <br />
PEDIATRIC USE: _http://tinyurl.com/6r3kqo_ (http://tinyurl.com/6r3kqo) <br />
REMOVED FROM CLINICAL USE: _http://tinyurl.com/5khtv4_ <br />
(http://tinyurl.com/5khtv4) <br />
HUMAN AND ANIMAL STUDIES: _http://tinyurl.com/6x9nfl_ <br />
(http://tinyurl.com/6x9nfl) <br />
Blood Disorders: _http://tinyurl.com/5m7wfp_ (http://tinyurl.com/5m7wfp) <br />
Causation:  _http://tinyurl.com/62dxab_ (http://tinyurl.com/62dxab) <br />
Central Nervous and Peripheral Nervous System:  _http://tinyurl.com/55wrzj_ <br />
(http://tinyurl.com/55wrzj) <br />
Gastrointestinal:  _http://tinyurl.com/69mo2b_ (http://tinyurl.com/69mo2b) <br />
Hypoglycemia:  _http://tinyurl.com/5quwpk_ (http://tinyurl.com/5quwpk) <br />
Litigation:  _http://tinyurl.com/5bfccj_ (http://tinyurl.com/5bfccj) <br />
DRUG RESIDUE IN MEAT AND POULTRY: _http://tinyurl.com/6kzwhd_ <br />
(http://tinyurl.com/6kzwhd) <br />
Misc Published / Newspaper Reports: _http://tinyurl.com/5vmr8d_ <br />
(http://tinyurl.com/5vmr8d) <br />
Sleep  Disturbances:  _http://tinyurl.com/6ypvbx_ (http://tinyurl.com/6ypvbx) <br />
False and Misleading Statements: _http://tinyurl.com/6gf43u_ <br />
(http://tinyurl.com/6gf43u) <br />
Dear Doctor Letters / Medical Alerts:  _http://tinyurl.com/62w56n_ <br />
(http://tinyurl.com/62w56n) <br />
Scripting Abuse:  _http://tinyurl.com/5f6fhg_ (http://tinyurl.com/5f6fhg) <br />
Fluoroquinolone Fatalities:  _http://tinyurl.com/5hobqn_ <br />
(http://tinyurl.com/5hobqn) <br />
Post Marketing:  _http://tinyurl.com/6ajryb_ (http://tinyurl.com/6ajryb) <br />
 <br />
As well as the following attachments:<br />
 <br />
_Attachment A Post Marketing Reports VIA Quinolone ADR Forums_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_A.doc)  <br />
 <br />
_Attachment B Vision Problems Reported Medications.com_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_B.doc)   <br />
_Attachment C FDA Advisory Committee RE: Moxifloxacin Cardiac  Events_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_C.doc)   <br />
_Attachment D Vasculitis _ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_D.doc)  <br />
_Attachment E Toxic Psychosis (1 of 3)_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_E.doc)   <br />
_Attachment F Toxic Psychosis (2 of 3)_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_F.doc)   <br />
_Attachment G Toxic Psychosis (3 of 3)_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_G.doc)  <br />
_Attachment H Mutagenicity (1 of 2)_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_H.doc)  <br />
_Attachment I Pediatric MedWatch Reports (1 of 2) (w/  Fatalities)_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_I.doc)   <br />
_Attachment J Breastfeeding and Quinolones_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_J.doc)   <br />
_Attachment K 62nd Meeting of the Anti-Infective Drugs  Advisory Committee_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_K.doc)  <br />
_Attachment L QT Intervals Moxifloxacin_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_L.doc)   <br />
_Attachment M Mechanism of Action_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_M.doc)   <br />
_Attachment N Pneumonia Contra Indicated_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_N.doc)   <br />
_Attachment O Pseudotumor Cerebi _ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_O.doc)  <br />
_Attachment P Mutagenicity (2 of 2)_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_P.doc)  <br />
_Attachment Q Pediatric MedWatch Reports (2 of 2) _ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_Q.doc)  <br />
_Attachment R Guilty Plea in Drug Residue Case_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_R.doc)  <br />
_Attachment S Detection of Drug Residue _ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_S.doc)  <br />
_Attachment T Warnings Ignored Raxar_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_T.doc)  <br />
_Attachment U Bayer Accused of Fraud_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_U.doc)   <br />
_Attachment V Lariam and Fluoroquinolones Chemical Structures_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_V.doc)   <br />
_Attachment W Market Share Unapproved Usage_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_W.doc)   <br />
_Attachment X Adverse Profile Quinolones_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_X.doc)   <br />
_Attachment Y Post Marketing Reports Postal Workers_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_Y.doc)   <br />
_Attachment Z Bayer; Fraud and Unethical Behavior_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_Z.doc)   <br />
_Attachment AA Post Marketing Reports (1 of 3)_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_AA.doc)   <br />
_Attachment BB Post Marketing Reports (2 of 3)_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_BB.doc)  <br />
_Attachment CC Post Marketing Reports (3 of 3) _ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_CC.doc)  <br />
_Attachment DD Non Abating Vision Damage_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_DD.doc)  <br />
_Attachment EE Quotes from Peter Ball and Glen  Tillotson_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_EE.doc)  <br />
_Attachment FF Ortho McNeil _ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_FF.doc)  <br />
_Attachment GG Moxifloxacin _ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_GG.doc)  <br />
_Attachment HH 62nd Advisory Meeting Pediatrics_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_HH.doc)   <br />
_Attachment II Pediatric MedWatch Reports_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_II.doc)  </p>

<p>_Attachment A-1Warning Letters_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_A-1.doc) </p>

<p>_Attachment A-2 DNA DAMAGE_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachement_A-2.doc) </p>

<p>_Attachment A-3 Tendon Damage Associated with Fluoroquinolone Use,  Reported <br />
in the Literature (1972-2005)_ <br />
(http://fqresearch.org/attachments/Attachment_A-3.doc) </p>

<p></p>

<p>**************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for <br />
FanHouse Fantasy Football today.      <br />
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)<br />
</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-21T14:37:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6790789</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6790789" />
    <title>Comment from RochelleGracchus on 2008-07-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>RochelleGracchus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This class is associated with irreversible peripheral neuropathy, fatal  
liver and kidney damage, fatal hypo and hyperglycemia, SJS and TEN, toxic  
psychosis, spontaneous ruptures not only of the tendons but also muscles,  ligaments 
and cartilage, the list of serious adrs is boundless.  
 
Citations: (this is just a very brief list for the tendon issues  alone.  The 
total list regarding the tendon issues is well over 48 pages,  single 
spaced.)  These citations are numbered and spaced.  But for  some reason they do not 
appear this way when posted here.  So with a little  effort you may have to 
cut and paste this into your word processor and add the  spacing back in.  I 
have added ( ) around the number corresponding to each  citation.
 
(1) Nalidixic Acid arthralgia
Bailey et al (CMA Journal 1972; 107  601-605)
 
(2) Norfloxacin induced rheumatic disease
Bailey et al (NZ Med J  1983; 96; 590)
 
(3) 100 reported tendinopathies 1985-1992 France
In France, between  1985 and 1992, 100 patients who were being managed with 
fluoroquinolones had  tendon disorders, which included thirty-one ruptures 
(Royer, R. J.; Pierfitte,  C.; and Netter, P.: Features of tendon disorders with 
fluoroquinolones.  Therapie, 49: 75-76, 1994.)
_http://www.studiomedico.it/allegati/achille.pdf_ 
(http://www.studiomedico.it/allegati/achille.pdf) 
 
(4) Tendon disorders attributed to fluoroquinolones; a study on 42  
spontaneous reports in the period 1988-1998
Van Der Linden et al (American  College of Rheumatology; Arthritis Care and 
Research 45; 2001 pages
 
(5) Perrot S, Ziza JM, De Bourran-Cauet G, Desplaces N, Lachand  AT.
[A new complication related to quinolones: rupture of Achilles  tendon]
Presse Med. 1991 Jul 6-13;20(26):1234. French. No abstract available.  
PMID: 1831902 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
 
(6) Seven Achilles tendinitis including three complicated by rupture  during 
fluoroquinolone therapy
Ribard et al (J Rheumatol 1992; 19;  1479-1481)
 
(7) 704 achilles tendinitis, 38 ruptures 1992-1998  Netherlands
Fluoroquinolone use and the change in incidence of tendon rupture  in the 
Netherlands 
Van der Linden et al (Pharmacy World and Science vol 23  no 3 2001 pg 89-92) 
The cohort included 46 776 users of fluoroquinolones  between 1 July 1992 and 
30 June 30 1998, of whom 704 had Achilles tendinitis and  38 had Achilles 
tendon rupture
source: _http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7349/1306_ 
(http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7349/1306) 
 
(8) Royer RJ, Pierfitte C, Netter P.
Features of tendon disorders  with fluoroquinolones.
Therapie. 1994 Jan-Feb;49(1):75-6. No abstract  available. 
PMID: 8091374 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
 
(9) Dekens-Konter JA, Knol A, Olsson S, Meyboom RH, de Koning  GH.
[Tendinitis of the Achilles tendon caused by pefloxacin and  other
fluoroquinolone derivatives]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1994 Mar  5;138(10):528-31. Dutch. 
PMID: 8139714 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
 
(10)      Szarfman A, Chen M, Blum MD. More on  fluoroquinolone antibiotics 
and tendon rupture. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 193[Free  Full Text]. 
 
(11)     Pierfitte C, Royer RJ.
Tendon disorders  with fluoroquinolones.
Therapie. 1996 Jul-Aug;51(4):419-20. No abstract  available. 
PMID: 8953821 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
 
(12) Castagnola C, Suhler A.
[Tendinopathy and  fluoroquinolones]
Ann Urol (Paris). 1996;30(3):129-30. French. 
PMID:  8766149 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
 
(13) Maki T, Heinasmaki T, Riutta J, Tikkanen T, Laasonen L, Eklund K.  
[Bilateral Achilles tendon rupture caused by oral  fluoroquinolones]
Duodecim. 1996;112(19):1818-20. Finnish. No abstract  available. 
PMID: 10596182 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE
 
(14) 130 reported tendon inflammation or rupture (England, France and  
Belgium, 1996)
The group cited 130 reports of tendon inflammation or rupture  in people who 
used the prescription drug in England, France and Belgium. The FDA  has 
received at least 52 reports of patients in the U.S. who have suffered  tendon damage
 
(15)  FRANCE
921 reported tendon disorders France
340 reported  tendonitis, 81 tendon ruptures 1996, WHO
Adverse drug reactions with  fluoroquinolones The French system of drug 
surveillance has analyzed the reports  of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to 
fluoroquinolones since they were launched.  The frequency of reactions ranges from 
1/15000 to 1/208000 case per days of  treatment. Cutaneous disorders and tendon 
disorders dominate in France, whereas  cutaneous effects and neuropsychiatric 
disorders are predominant in the UK;  tendon disorders take up only the 5th 
position. Among the most unexpected ADRs  are the following: 1- Shock 2- Acure 
renal failure Tendon ruptures represent 81  cases for 921 reports of tendon 
disorders which are related in decreasing order  to pefloxacin 1/23130 case per 
days of treatment, ofloxin, norfloxacin and  ciprofloxacin 1/779600 case per 
days of treatment. Age and corticosteroids  increase the risk of tendon rupture. 
Therapie 1996; 51; 419-420 Tendon disorders  with fluoroquinolones 421 cases 
have been collected by the Centre de  Pharmacovigilance: 340 of tendinitis and 
81 of tendon rupture. These cases were  attributed to Peflacine, Oflocet, 
Noroxine, Ciflox. Tendinitis was characterized  by a bilateral malleolar oedema 
associated with a sudden pain. Sometimes this  oedema evoked phlebitis. The 
tendon rupture was generally preceded by a  tendinitis but in half of the cases it 
occurred without warning. 
Source: _http://www.who-umc.org/newsletter/newsltr97_1.html_ 
(http://www.who-umc.org/newsletter/newsltr97_1.html)   (sic)
 
(16)    Australia. 
The Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory  Committee first reported tendinitis in 
association with fluoroquinolone  antibiotics in 1997. The Committee has 
continued to monitor this adverse  reaction, and has now received 60 reports of 
tendinitis, tensosynovitis and/or  tendon rupture in association with these drugs. 
Ciprofloxacin was most  frequently cited (55 reports), as well as norfloxacin 
(4) and enoxacin  (1).
Forty-five reports described tendinitis alone, one report described  
tensosynovitis, and 14 reports documented tendon tear or rupture. Fifty-five of  the 
60 reports specified the Achilles tendon, including 20 which described  
bilateral Achilles tendon damage. All 14 reports of tendon rupture involved the  
Achilles tendon. The 58 patients ranged in age from 38 to 91 years (median: 69),  
with no significant difference between those with tendinitis and those with  
tendon rupture.
The daily doses of ciprofloxacin ranged from 500 mg to 2250  mg, with 46% of 
patients taking 1500 mg and 46% of patients taking 1000 mg  daily. For those 
who developed tendon rupture, 57% were taking 1500 mg daily.  Time to onset 
varied from within 24 hours after the drug was commenced to 3  months after 
starting, but the majority of cases of tendinitis occurred within  the first week. 
Time to rupture was longer with a median time of 2-3 weeks.  Known risk 
factors for these reactions include old age, renal dysfunction and  concomitant 
corticosteroid therapy. In the cases reported to the ADRAC, 29  reports documented 
concomitant corticosteroid use, and in 21 of the other 31  reports the 
patients were aged 69 years or older. In the reports of tendon  rupture, 12 of the 
14 described either concomitant steroid use (9) or old age  (9).
Prescribers are reminded to be alert for this reaction and to withdraw  the 
fluoroquinolone immediately when symptoms of tendinitis appear in order to  
reduce the risk of tendon rupture.
[See also Pharmaceuticals Newsletter Nos.  7&8, July&August 1997.]
Tendinitis associated with Fluoroquinolone  therapy 
(Pharmaceuticals Newsletters Nos 7&8 July & August 1997) 
 
(17)    van der Linden PD, van Puijenbroek EP, Feenstra J,  Veld BA, 
Sturkenboom MC, Herings RM, Leufkens HG, Stricker BH. 
Tendon  disorders attributed to fluoroquinolones: a study on 42 spontaneous 
reports in  the period 1988 to 1998. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Jun;45(3):235-9. 
PMID:  11409663 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
 
(18) NETHERLANDS
704 achilles tendinitis, 38 ruptures 1992-1998  Netherlands
Fluoroquinolone use and the change in incidence of tendon rupture  in the 
Netherlands 
Van der Linden et al (Pharmacy World and Science vol 23  no 3 2001 pg 89-92) 
The cohort included 46 776 users of fluoroquinolones  between 1 July 1992 and 
30 June 30 1998, of whom 704 had Achilles tendinitis and  38 had Achilles 
tendon rupture
source: _http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7349/1306_ 
(http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7349/1306) 
 
(19) Harrell RM.
Fluoroquinolone-induced tendinopathy: what do we  know?
South Med J. 1999 Jun;92(6):622-5. Review. 
PMID: 10372859 [PubMed -  indexed for MEDLINE]
 
(20)  van der Linden PD, van de Lei J, Nab HW, Knol A, Stricker BH.  
Achilles tendinitis associated with fluoroquinolones.
Br J Clin  Pharmacol. 1999 Sep;48(3):433-7. 
PMID: 10510157 [PubMed - indexed for  MEDLINE]
 
(21) 60 reported tendonitis August 1999
Fluoroquinolones tendinitis  update Australia 
Tendinitis associated with Fluoroquinolone therapy  
(Pharmaceuticals Newsletters Nos 7&8 July & August 1997)  
Australia
ADRAC Bulletin, vol 18, No 3, August 1999
Tendinitis and  tendon rupture with fluoroquinolones
The Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory  Committee (ADRAC) first reported 
tendinitis in association with the  fluoroquinolone antibiotics in 1997. The 
Committee has continued to monitor this  adverse
reaction, and has now received 60 reports of tendinitis,  tenosynovitis 
and/or tendon rupture in association with these drugs. Most  involved was 
ciprofloxacin (55), but there were also reports with norfloxacin  (4) and enoxacin (1). 
Fortyfive reports described tendinitis alone, one report  described 
tenosynovitis, and 14 reports documented tendon tear or rupture. Fifty  five of the 60 
reports specified the Achilles tendon, including 20 which  described bilateral
Achilles tendon damage. All 14 reports of tendon  rupture
involved the Achilles tendon. 
Source: _http://www.who.int/medicines/library/pnewslet/pndec99.html_ 
(http://www.who.int/medicines/library/pnewslet/pndec99.html) 
 
(22) 421 reported tendon disorders and 81 tendon ruptures  1999
Therapie 1996; 51: 419-420 Tendon disorders with fluoroquinolones 421  cases 
have been collected by the Centre de Pharmacovigilance, 340 of tendinitis  and 
81 cases of tendon rupture. 
 
(23)   Infection. 2000  Jul-Aug;28(4):256-7.
Fluoroquinolone-induced tendinopathy: also occurring  with levofloxacin.
 
(24) Quinolone and Tendon Ruptures
Casperian et al (Southern  Medical Journal May 2000 vol 93 no 5 pages 488-491)
 
(25)  Rupture of the patellar ligament one month after treatment with  
fluoroquinolone
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000  Sep;86(5):495-7.
 
(26) FINLAND
42 reported tendinopathies 2000
Finland:  
Register of adverse drug reactions in 2000
The majority of ADR reports  received among antibacterials concerned 
levofloxacin, which is a fluoroquinolone  antibiotic. Fourteen of the reports were on 
tendinitis or rupture of the  Achilles tendon. Tendinitis caused by 
fluoroquinolones was discussed in TABU for  the first time in 1996. Since then the ADR 
register has received a total of 42  reports on tendinopathies caused by
fluoroquinolones, over a third of which  were ruptures of the tendon.
The use of fluoroquinolones has in-creased by  about 75% since 1996. 
Levofloxacin is responsible for the major part of this  increase. It has been marketed 
in Finland since mid 1998.
source: _www.nam.fi/uploads/english/Publications/Tabu/tabu22001_eng.pdf_ 
(http://www.nam.fi/uploads/english/Publications/Tabu/tabu22001_eng.pdf) 
 
(27) Pharm World Sci. 2001 Jun;23(3):89-92.
Fluoroquinolone use and  the change in incidence of tendon ruptures in the 
Netherlands.
van der Linden  PD, Nab HW, Simonian S, Stricker BH, Leufkens HG, Herings RM.
 
(28)  1847 reported tendinopathies December 2001
Tabelle  7
Pharmacovigilance: Meldungen von Tendinopathien im Vergleich zu allen  
gemeldeten unerwĂĽnschten Arzneimittelwirkungen (UAW), Stand 17. Dezember  2001.
 
(29)  Van der Linden et al (Pharmacy World and Science vol 23 no 3  2001 pg 
89-92) 
The cohort included 46 776 users of fluoroquinolones between  1 July 1992 and 
30 June 30 1998, of whom 704 had Achilles tendinitis and 38 had  Achilles 
tendon rupture
source: _http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7349/1306_ 
(http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7349/1306) 
 
(30)  van der Linden PD, Sturkenboom MC, Herings RM, Leufkens HG,  Stricker 
BH.
Fluoroquinolones and risk of Achilles tendon disorders:  case-control study.
BMJ. 2002 Jun 1;324(7349):1306-7. No abstract available.  
PMID: 12039823 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
 
(31)  Breck RW.
"Ciprofloxacin: a warning for clinicians".
Conn  Med. 2002 Oct;66(10):635. No abstract available. 
PMID: 12448217 [PubMed -  indexed for MEDLINE]
 
(32)  Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2003) 51, 747â€“748
DOI:  10.1093/jac/dkg081
Advance Access publication 28 January  2003
Correspondence
Spontaneous Achilles tendon rupture in  patients
treated with levofloxacin
L. J. Haddow, M. Chandra Sekhar, V.  Hajela and
G. Gopal Rao
 
(33)  Cetti R, Junge J, Vyberg M.
Spontaneous rupture of the  Achilles tendon is preceded by widespread and 
bilateral tendon damage and  ipsilateral inflammation: a clinical and 
histopathologic study of 60  patients.
Acta Orthop Scand. 2003 Feb;74(1):78-84. 
PMID: 12635798 [PubMed  - indexed for MEDLINE]
 
(34)  Khaliq Y, Zhanel GG.
Fluoroquinolone-associated tendinopathy:  a critical review of the literature.
Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Jun  1;36(11):1404-10. Epub 2003 May 20. Review. 
PMID: 12766835 [PubMed - indexed  for MEDLINE]
 
(35) Haddow LJ, Chandra Sekhar M, Hajela V, Gopal Rao G. 
Spontaneous  Achilles tendon rupture in patients treated with levofloxacin.
J Antimicrob  Chemother. 2003 Mar;51(3):747-8. No abstract available. 
PMID: 12615887  [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
 
(36) Vergara Fernandez I.
[Muscle and tendon problems as a  side-effect of levofloxacine: review of a 
case]
Aten Primaria. 2004 Mar  15;33(4):214. Spanish. No abstract available. 
PMID: 15023326 [PubMed -  indexed for MEDLINE]
 
(37)  Long term outcome after Fluoroquinolones  tendinopathies
13/01/2004 14:11:07 P-0077
C Guy (1); Y Murat (1); MN  Beyens (1); M Ratrema (1); G Mounier (1); M 
Ollagnier (1); (1) Centre de  Pharmacovigilance, HĂ´pital Bellevue - CHU St-Etienne, 
Sant-Etienne
 
(38) Toxicology. 2005 May 9 
Fluoroquinolones cause changes in  extracellular matrix, signalling proteins, 
metalloproteinases and caspase-3 in  cultured human tendon cells.
Sendzik J, Shakibaei M, Schafer-Korting M,  Stahlmann R.
 
(39) DUTCH
Fluoroquinolones have been associated with tendon disorders,  usually during 
the first month of treatment,1-5 but the epidemiological evidence  is scanty. 
We did a nested case-control study among users of fluoroquinolones in  a large 
UK general practice database to study the association with Achilles  tendon 
disorders. 
 
Participants, methods, and results 
 
We obtained data from the IMS Health database (UK MediPlus), which contains  
data from general practice on consultations, morbidity, prescriptions, and 
other  interventions in a source population of 1-2 million inhabitants. The base 
cohort  consisted of all patients aged 18 years or over who had received a  
fluoroquinolone. We excluded people with a history of Achilles tendon disorders, 
 cancer, AIDS, illicit drug use, or alcohol misuse. We identified potential 
cases  by reviewing patient profiles and clinical data and excluded tendon 
disorders  due to direct trauma. We randomly sampled a group of 10 000 control 
patients  from the study cohort. 
 
We defined four categories of exposure to fluoroquinolones: current use,  
recent use, past use, and no use. We defined current use as when the tendon  
disorder occurred in the period between the start of the fluoroquinolone  
treatment and the calculated end date plus 30 days, recent use as when the  calculated 
end date was between 30 and 90 days before the occurrence of the  disorder, 
and past use as when the calculated end date was more than 90 days  before the 
occurrence of the disorder. We used unconditional logistic regression  
analysis to calculate adjusted relative risks and 95% confidence intervals for  
Achilles tendon disorders, using the no use group as the reference. We adjusted  
for age, sex, number of visits to the general practitioner, use of  
corticosteroid, calendar year, obesity, and history of musculoskeletal  disorders. 
 
The cohort included 46 776 users of fluoroquinolones between 1 July 1992  and 
30 June 30 1998, of whom 704 had Achilles tendinitis and 38 had Achilles  
tendon rupture. Four hundred and fifty three (61%) of the cases were women, and  
the mean age was 56 years. Cases visited the general practitioner 
significantly  more often than did controls (mean 20 v 17). Cases and controls were 
similar  with respect to indications for use of fluoroquinolone. Age, number of 
visits to  the general practitioner in the previous 18 months, gout, obesity, and 
use of  corticosteroid were determinants of Achilles tendon disorders. The 
adjusted  relative risk of Achilles tendon disorders with current use of 
fluoroquinolones  was 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.6). The risk for recent 
and past use  was similar to that for no use. The relative risk with current use 
was 3.2 (2.1  to 4.9) among patients aged 60 and over and 0.9 (0.5 to 1.6) 
among patients aged  under 60 (table). In patients aged 60 or over, concurrent 
use of corticosteroids  and fluoroquinolones increased the risk to 6.2 (3.0 to 
12.8). 
 
Relative risk of Achilles tendon disorders associated with use of  
fluoroquinolones according to age
Current exposure to fluoroquinolones  increases the risk of Achilles tendon 
disorders. This finding is in agreement  with a smaller study, in which we 
found an association between tendinitis and  fluoroquinolones.5 Our results 
indicate that this adverse effect is relatively  rare, with an overall excess risk 
of 3.2 cases per 1000 patient years. The  effect seems to be restricted to 
people aged 60 or over, and within this group  concomitant use of corticosteroids 
increased the risk substantially. The  proportion of Achilles tendon disorders 
among patients with both risk factors  that is attributable to their 
interaction was 87%. Although the mechanism is  unknown, the sudden onset of some 
tendinopathies, occasionally after a single  dose of a fluoroquinolone, suggests a 
direct toxic effect on collagen fibres.  Prescribers should be aware of this 
risk, especially in elderly people taking  corticosteroids. 
 
(40) McGarvey WC, Singh D, Trevino SG. 
Partial Achilles tendon ruptures  associated with fluoroquinolone 
antibiotics: a
case report and literature  review.
Foot Ankle Int. 1996 Aug;17(8):496-8. Review. 
PMID: 8863030  [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
 
As well as the recent pediatric studies:
Safety Review of the five  pediatric trials relied upon by the FDA to grant 
an extension of pediatric  exclusivity to Johnson and Johnson:
1st Study:  Of the 712 subjects  evaluable for safety, 275 (52%) 
levofloxacin-treated subjects  experienced  1 or more adverse event.  Seventeen subjects 
had 23 adverse events of  marked severity.  Twenty-three subjects experienced 
MS adverse events.  Serious adverse events were reported in 33 (6%) 
levofloxacin-treated  subjects.  Two serious adverse events in levofloxacin-treated 
subjects  resulted in fatal outcomes.  Adverse events leading to treatment  
discontinuation occurred in 12 (2%). 
 
 
2nd Study:   Of the 204 subjects evaluable for safety, 122  experienced 1 or 
more adverse events.  Twelve were marked in  severity:  Twelve subjects (6%) 
discontinued study drug due to an adverse  event.  Six subjects experienced a 
MS adverse event. There were no deaths.  Seven subjects (3%) experienced 8 
serious adverse events. 

<p><br />
3rd Study:   Results of this study are not available even though  they are <br />
required to be posted on the clinicaltrials.gov website within one year  of <br />
completion. There is not conclusions posted on that site as of  3-26-2008</p>

<p><br />
4th Study:  Results of this study will not be available for about  15-20 <br />
years. Patients who develop one or more musculoskeletal disorders during  the <br />
first year will be monitored until they have completed puberty (15th  birthday for <br />
females and 17th birthday for males). </p>

<p><br />
5th Study:  Results of this study are not available even though they  are <br />
required to be posted on the clinicaltrials.gov website within one year of  <br />
completion. There is not conclusions posted on that site as of 3-26-2008. The  <br />
results of this study have not been posted on clinicaltrials.gov as required by  <br />
law. No results available to be posted as none can be found at this time, even  <br />
though Federal Law requires that they be available through the  <br />
clinicaltrials.gov website a through search failed to locate this study and the  results <br />
thereto. <br />
 </p>

<p>Within the NDA (new drug application) for levofloxacin we find clinical  <br />
studies that revealed an adr rate in excess of 40% (one or more reactions) and a  <br />
number of listed fatalities. Citing to the NDA for levaquin, readily available <br />
 on the FDA website in a PDF format.<br />
 </p>

<p>Bayer issued a European "Dear Doctor Letter" in February of 2008 in  regards <br />
to fatal liver injury as a result of being on Avelox.  Citing to  the letter <br />
that is readily available on the research site under the Breaking  News <br />
heading.  You can also follow this link to read the letter as well: <br />
_http://tinyurl.com/5t23dm_ (http://tinyurl.com/5t23dm) <br />
 <br />
I fail to understand why you would have such a problem with the research  <br />
site.  All you have to do is click on whatever adr you are interested  in.  <br />
Choose any citation from the list presented, and then read it.   If the full text <br />
is not available that would be the result of copyright  problems, or it is a â€<br />
pay to viewâ€™ article, which most of the negative articles  are exactly that.  <br />
So do a google search and spend some of your hard earn  cash for the right to <br />
read it.  It is not I that makes you do that but  either the author or the drug <br />
company that does not want such information to be  readily available.  This <br />
is NO different than what would be required of you  on pubmed.  They too <br />
present a list, some with nothing more than the  citation, others with just the <br />
abstract, and if you are lucky the full  article.  If this is good enough for <br />
pubmed, than I would it believe it to  be good enough for you.<br />
 <br />
If the majority of these articles are to be considered â€crapâ€™ then I would  <br />
imagine they fail to support the propaganda presented by the drug companies in <br />
 your view.  And NO the site is balanced and shows all of the relevant data  <br />
that could be found concerning this class.  The good, the bad, and the  ugly.  <br />
Again it is not to be considered my fault that the majority of the  articles <br />
found there reveal a horrendous safety profile.  I did not write  them, I am <br />
simply presenting them in their original form.  If you care to I  am more than <br />
willing to flood this site with citations supporting everything  that I have <br />
stated.  Just point out one of the listed adrs I mentioned that  you feel have <br />
nothing to do with fluoroquinolone therapy and I will do exactly  that.  You <br />
are scaring me that a college kid canâ€™t figure out how to click  on a link and <br />
then follow it to the list of citations.  </p>

<p></p>

<p>**************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for <br />
FanHouse Fantasy Football today.      <br />
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)<br />
</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-21T07:54:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6789528</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6789528" />
    <title>Comment from Phexerian on 2008-07-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phexerian</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>EDIT:  The research forum does work, just was a badly designed website.  The literature is overwhelming.  I hope you don't expect me to dig through it completely.  I also wonder, is all the literature anti fluoroquinolone?</p>
<p>After a brief look at some of the research directly related to tendon rupture, most of them are only case reports or just articles that are in the news.  Case reports are not considered substantial and are only there to say "Hey look at me!  This could possibly be researched!!"</p>
<p>There are only a handful of actual research articles on tendon effects.  This archive of research info is mostly crap.  Half of the articles aren't completely there, and only give a brief overview.</p>
<p>Perhaps if this website wanted to be more effective, it would 1) do a better job of designing its website 2) make the research easier to access 3) not put up complete crap in the research archive section.</p>
<p>Perhaps you should, next time you post, cite some direct research.  Thanks.</p>
<p>-Phex<br />
-3rd Year PharmD / MBA Candidate</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-21T05:00:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6789422</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6789422" />
    <title>Comment from Phexerian on 2008-07-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phexerian</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>Your FQResearch.org website does not have the research available to look at on their website, and therefor, I can't take your post for having much substance at the current time.</p>
<p>The only part of your post that had any substance was the time line regarding the FDA's actions to the petition.  You did not really cite anything, but it is implied that it is accurate since it is pretty common knowledge and can be looked up easily.</p>
<p>Dr Plumbs post is quite informative and for the most part I agree with it.  I must admit that I am not that familiar with the tendon problem side effect of the drug but am only familiar from rxlist.com that the rate of occurrence is less than 1%.  This is what was reported to the FDA in clinical trials I would assume.  This number could change after more of a population starts to take the drug, and thus the reason for post market research and surveillance.  But, like the good doctor said, the FDA is antiquated in its reporting system, and as I have added in, are underfunded and understaffed.  I would also like to add in that they have a revolving door policy with big pharma which is a huge conflict of interest.  After one works for big pharma for a while, and they leave, they can get a job easily with the fda and vice versa.</p>
<p>Because the drug companies must pay "fees" yearly to the FDA, it has come to the point where big pharma is actually funding the drug companies.  I would assume pretty close to the same amount as the tax payers are.  This is creates another conflict of interest.  The persons whom they are supposed to be regulating, are the ones that fund them.</p>
<p>If there is a higher rate than 1% for the tendon side effects, the FDA should state it blatantly.  One must understand though, that us health care practitioners can only prescribe and go with the data that is given to us.  If the AMA looked at all the literature on it, and regarded it as safe to prescribe and effective for certain disease states, then physicians must go by the guidelines given by the AMA.  I would assume that the literature on FQresearch.org has been taken into account already though I could be wrong.</p>
<p>Until the guidelines change, prescribing habits of physicians are probably not going to change regarding this class of antibiotics.  I hope at the least that this black box warning turns some heads.</p>
<p>-Phex<br />
-3rd Year PharmD / MBA Candidate</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-21T04:46:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6787420</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6787420" />
    <title>Comment from kyle4 on 2008-07-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>kyle4</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is why, unless I'm going to die of a disease, I don't take medications. I learned from the past, and it's so terribly tragic that yet another medication is injuring people.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-20T22:30:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6783900</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6783900" />
    <title>Comment from RochelleGracchus on 2008-07-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>RochelleGracchus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>We have been warned of the dangers of these drugs. Its literally drilled  
into our heads over and over in medical school. 
 
Then WHY pray tell are so many physicians so grossly uninformed concerning  
the safety profile of this class?
The fact remains, these are rare events for the most part. As the above  
poster mentioned, it is less than 1% in adult patients according to clinical  
trials and the benefit far outweighs the risks. 
 
Your killing me here, nothing could possibly be further from the  truth.  The 
risk factor as stated within any number of publications range  anywhere from 
.5% to 16%.  This is NOT one in a hundred by any means.   And this fails to 
take into account the gross number of such ruptures that were  NEVER properly 
associated with the fluoroquinolones by the treating  physician.  And do not 
point to clinical studies please, I have read more  entertaining fairy tales 
written by the Brother's Grimm.  For example in  one study three patients suffered 
such a rupture.  It was NOT reported as  it was not one of the listed adverse 
reactions that were part of the trials  protocal.

<p>As for not treating a sinus infection, that is false. If an infection  is <br />
bacterial, we pretty much always treat it. It so happens that most cases of  <br />
acute sinusitis are of viral origin, but if there is reason to suspect it is  <br />
bacterial, standard of care is to treat it with an antibiotic (Augmentin is  <br />
usually firt line but flouroquinolones are frequently used and quite effective  as <br />
well). Again, flouroquinolones are VERY GOOD, MOSTLY SAFE drugs. They aren't  <br />
nukes of the antibiotic world, just good broad coverage abx.<br />
 <br />
If a drug that can cripple a patient for life, cause irreversible  peripheral <br />
nueropathy, fatal damage to a patients vital organs, and totally  trashes the <br />
patient's DNA is to be considered a "VERY GOOD, MOSTLY SAFE DRUG,"  what is <br />
to be considered a defective drug in comparison? Arsenic perhaps rather  than <br />
this proven toxic form of chemotherapy?</p>

<p></p>

<p>**************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for <br />
FanHouse Fantasy Football today.      <br />
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)<br />
</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-20T06:52:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6779673</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6779673" />
    <title>Comment from teriaw on 2008-07-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>teriaw</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think it's great to see more publicity about fluoroquinolone side effects.  Many doctors forget that patients have a right to be informed about side effects, or perhaps doctors are not informed of side effects well enough to have intelligent conversations about them with their patients. I had a conversation with my doctor about possible side effects of Levaquin before I took it, and my doctor never mentioned tendon disorders, and convinced me to take the Levaquin since it'd be no problem for me to switch to a different antibiotic if I did have side effects.  Or so we both thought.<br />
Luckily my mom came across a publication by Public Citizen that talked about tendon damage by fluoroquinolones when I was 7 days into my 14+day course of Levaquin.  I'd been wondering why my achilles were so sore and my calves so rock hard.  Four years later with continued tendon and nerve pain, I'm still regretting that initial assumption that side effects go away when I quit ingesting the pills.  But if this is what the result of 7 days of Levaquin is like, thank goodness for that article by Public Citizen that kept me from taking 14 days worth of pills. I am a formerly healthy, active 35 year old.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-19T19:34:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6778318</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6778318" />
    <title>Comment from RochelleGracchus on 2008-07-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>RochelleGracchus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Tendon rupture is the least of the patient's concerns. This class is  
associated with irreversible peripheral neuropathy, fatal liver and kidney  damage, 
fatal hypo and hyperglycemia, SJS and TEN, toxic psychosis, spontaneous  
ruptures not only of the tendons but also muscles, ligaments and cartilage, the  
list of serious adrs is boundless. More than half of the drugs found in this  
class have been removed from clinical practice due to severe and even fatal  
adverse reactions.
 
I just received a report of a 14year old male who tore the cartilage in  both 
knees requiring extensive surgical intervention as a result of being on  
levaquin to treat a nail infection. Not to mention they young lady who has been  
in a wheelchair for the past decade due to the damage done to her tendons which 
 rendered them beyond surgical repair. She was given cipro for an earache.  
 
Within the NDA (new drug application) for levofloxacin we find clinical  
studies that revealed an adr rate in excess of 40% (one or more reactions) and a  
number of listed fatalities. We find these same numbers with all the NDAs for  
this class. This tendon issue we are now discussing was first revealed to the 
 FDA back in 1982 (bailey et al). The FDA did NOTHING until Public Citizen 
filed  a petition in 1996 seeking both black box warnings and dear doctor 
letters. The  FDA did neither. Another petition was filed by the Attorney General of 
the State  of Illinois in 2005 seeking these same actions. In 2006 Public 
Citizen once  again petitioned the FDA. Rather than respond to these petitions as 
required by  law, the FDA stonewalled the petitioners for more than three 
years. It was not  until suit was filed in Federal Court by Public Citizen to 
compel the FDA to  respond to these petitions did the FDA do anything.  
 
And what they did was nothing more than a 'slap to the face' to those of us  
who have had our lives destroyed by these drugs. It is far too little, far too 
 late. And we would not even be tossed this 'bone' if this lawsuit were not  
pending. This is nothing more than a blatant attempt by the FDA to avoid full  
disclosure of the true safety profile of this class which will be required 
when  they lose in Federal Court. 
 
Bayer issued a European "Dear Doctor Letter" in February of 2008 in regards  
to fatal liver injury as a result of being on Avelox. Yet we see no such 
letter  being issued here in the States, nor do we see the FDA requesting one  
either.  This class has been crippling and killing patients since the mid  
sixties. For more than forty years now the FDA has hidden the true safety  profile 
from both the patient as well as the treating physician. 
 
Those who have an interest in reading this forty years worth of medical  
journal entries, case reports, newspaper articles, clinical studies, etc., that  
documents all that I state here are invited to log unto _www.fqresearch.org_ 
(http://www.fqresearch.org)   The FDA is also  grossly misleading when they 
state that the risk factor is one in one hundred  thousand. The actual risk is .5% 
to 16% depending upon which citation you prefer  to reference as well as the 
year in which it was published. 
 
I find the manufacturers to be grossly misleading the patient and physician  
alike when they state that this class is a safe and effective antibiotic with  
minimum side effects. I have forty years worth of medical documentation that  
proves that they are anything but for those who care to read it, rather than  
this line of misleading and false information being provided by the FDA.
 
Mr. David T. Fuller
Director
Fluoroquinolone Toxicity Research  Foundation
www.fqresearch.org

<p></p>

<p><br />
**************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for <br />
FanHouse Fantasy Football today.      <br />
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)<br />
</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-19T10:40:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6776296</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6776296" />
    <title>Comment from RochelleGracchus on 2008-07-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>RochelleGracchus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Tendon rupture is the least of the patient's concerns. This class is  
associated with irreversible peripheral neuropathy, fatal liver and kidney  damage, 
fatal hypo and hyperglycemia, SJS and TEN, toxic psychosis, spontaneous  
ruptures not only of the tendons but also muscles, ligaments and cartilage, the  
list of serious adrs is boundless. More than half of the drugs found in this  
class have been removed from clinical practice due to severe and even fatal  
adverse reactions.
 
I just received a report of a 14year old male who tore the cartilage in  both 
knees requiring extensive surgical intervention as a result of being on  
levaquin to treat a nail infection. Not to mention they young lady who has been  
in a wheelchair for the past decade due to the damage done to her tendons which 
 rendered them beyond surgical repair. She was given cipro for an earache.  
 
Within the NDA (new drug application) for levofloxacin we find clinical  
studies that revealed an adr rate in excess of 40% (one or more reactions) and a  
number of listed fatalities. We find these same numbers with all the NDAs for  
this class. This tendon issue we are now discussing was first revealed to the 
 FDA back in 1982 (bailey et al). The FDA did NOTHING until Public Citizen 
filed  a petition in 1996 seeking both black box warnings and dear doctor 
letters. The  FDA did neither. Another petition was filed by the Attorney General of 
the State  of Illinois in 2005 seeking these same actions. In 2006 Public 
Citizen once  again petitioned the FDA. Rather than respond to these petitions as 
required by  law, the FDA stonewalled the petitioners for more than three 
years. It was not  until suit was filed in Federal Court by Public Citizen to 
compel the FDA to  respond to these petitions did the FDA do anything.  
 
And what they did was nothing more than a 'slap to the face' to those of us  
who have had our lives destroyed by these drugs. It is far too little, far too 
 late. And we would not even be tossed this 'bone' if this lawsuit were not  
pending. This is nothing more than a blatant attempt by the FDA to avoid full  
disclosure of the true safety profile of this class which will be required 
when  they lose in Federal Court. 
 
Bayer issued a European "Dear Doctor Letter" in February of 2008 in regards  
to fatal liver injury as a result of being on Avelox. Yet we see no such 
letter  being issued here in the States, nor do we see the FDA requesting one  
either.  This class has been crippling and killing patients since the mid  
sixties. For more than forty years now the FDA has hidden the true safety  profile 
from both the patient as well as the treating physician. 
 
Those who have an interest in reading this forty years worth of medical  
journal entries, case reports, newspaper articles, clinical studies, etc., that  
documents all that I state here are invited to log unto _www.fqresearch.org_ 
(http://www.fqresearch.org)   The FDA is also  grossly misleading when they 
state that the risk factor is one in one hundred  thousand. The actual risk is .5% 
to 16% depending upon which citation you prefer  to reference as well as the 
year in which it was published. 
 
I find the manufacturers to be grossly misleading the patient and physician  
alike when they state that this class is a safe and effective antibiotic with  
minimum side effects. I have forty years worth of medical documentation that  
proves that they are anything but for those who care to read it, rather than  
this line of misleading and false information being provided by the FDA.
 
Mr. David T. Fuller
Director
Fluoroquinolone Toxicity Research  Foundation
_www.fqresearch.org_ (http://www.fqresearch.org) 
_fqresearch@aol.com_ (mailto:fqresearch@aol.com) 
_davidtfull@aol.com_ (mailto:davidtfull@aol.com) 
 

<p></p>

<p></p>

<p>**************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for <br />
FanHouse Fantasy Football today.      <br />
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)<br />
</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-19T07:10:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6775394</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6775394" />
    <title>Comment from Zabella on 2008-07-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>Zabella</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I am also allergic to beta lactums, and have suffered a number of sinus infections that have been treated with some serious antibiotics. I agree that antibiotics are over prescribed and I try not to take them if at all possible. With my sinus problems this involves lots of steaming, decongestants and trying to put up with the pain for as long as possible. There are some instances however where I would not call a sinus infection simple. I have had meningitis, a bone infection and an infection in my eye all at separate times caused by a long standing sinus infection... I still continue to avoid anti biotics if at all possible though. It is a cost benefit analysis really!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-19T05:29:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6774736</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6774736" />
    <title>Comment from Alex Brewer on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alex Brewer</name>
        <uri>http://www.metalclef.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.metalclef.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm allergic to beta lactam antibiotics, which means penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, monobactams and beta-lactamase inhibitors.  I'm on a course of azithromycin (z-pak) because I just got four wisdom teeth out and don't have any problems/side effects.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-19T04:22:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6773647</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6773647" />
    <title>Comment from HunterDeiphobus on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>HunterDeiphobus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Fluoroquinolone antibiotics have damaged many people. Â Â I know of this severe damage on a personal level since I suffered such and adverse reaction to the fluoroquinolone antibiotic Levaquin myself 22 months ago.Â  Since then I have had daily pain and disability of my nervous and musculoskeletal systems and for several months had endocrine and gastrointestinal problems as well.Â  The disability and damage caused by fluoroquinolones is long term and may gradually escalate in that more severe problems such as worsened neuropathy, neuromuscular disorders, musculoskeletal disorders and endocrine disorders once initiated by the fluoroquinolones may develop with a delayed and insidious progress.Â  
Â 
This progression of the fluoroquinolone toxicity syndrome is well know by its sufferers and not recognized by health care givers.Â  There has been no investigation in to the reactions.Â  This lack of attention stems from of an antiquated FDA reporting system and the under-representation of the seriousness and frequency of the adverse reactions.Â  The makers of fluoroquinolones have no interest in investigating adverse reactions when doing so will hurt them financially.Â  It is only recently with the weight of litigation pressing down that the FDA has published its incomplete and grossly inadequate boxed warning about the potential for fluoroquinolone toxicity.Â  
Â 
Â 
I have met many other patients suffering from the adverse effects of fluoroquinolones.Â  Many of them reside in my community including 3 physicians and more than twenty patients.Â  
Â 
Although these drugs may be life saving in certain infections when less toxic antibiotics may fail, they have been promoted for use as first line treatment for sinusitis, and urinary tract infections, and are often given indiscriminately to unsuspecting patients by uninformed and cavalier physicians for such benign illnesses as the common upper respiratory infection.Â Â  Unfortunately for many patients they are trading a mild short term medical problem for a serious long term one.Â  
Â 
Sincerely,
Â 
Â 
Todd Plumb MD

<p><br />
</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-19T03:00:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6773273</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6773273" />
    <title>Comment from FrancisGeben on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>FrancisGeben</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I  was a healthy 42 year old male who took Levaquin for a sinus infection.  
The same day as the Black Box Warning  was issued; I was having my third tendon 
reattachment surgery.  I have to wait at least 6 weeks before I  can undergo 
yet a fourth tendon rupture reattachment.  At least it takes my mind of the  
Achilles Tendinopathy, joint pains, headaches, uncontrolled muscle twitching  
etc.    I consider myself  one of the lucky ones since so far it has not 
affected my kidneys, liver, heart,  eyes and other side effects that many are 
dealing with from this class of  drugs.  I would urge a real  journalist to take the 
time and look at the real number of cases.  The Fda numbers are misleading.  
The clinical data coming from other  counties are showing much higher rates of 
tendon ruptures and other life  threatening side effects

<p></p>

<p>**************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for <br />
FanHouse Fantasy Football today.      <br />
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)<br />
</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-19T02:40:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6771118</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6771118" />
    <title>Comment from Phexerian on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phexerian</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c6766490" rel="nofollow">nsv</a>: I agree with you that antibiotics are over prescribed a good bit.  I can't tell you how many people come in with a z-pak script that I dont think they need.</p>
<p>Yes, cholesterol can be lowered with more exercise and a better diet.  Honestly, who the blame comes down to is the patients and the physicians.  The patients think that if they just take this pill, they will instantly have better cholesterol.  The physicians, care too lazy to counsel their patients and get to the real root of the problem, so they just dish out the statins.  Not very many physicians that I have seen actually do this, but there are some.  But once again, after the physician does their part, the patient has to do theirs.</p>
<p>Generally, a physician should tell a patient to try exercise and dieting for a few months, then come back and re test and see if the cholesterol is a little better.  If it is improving, good, keep diet and exercising.  If not, then they put them on a statin.</p>
<p>"If half the people taking statins don't need them, we've doubled the number of people who will suffer side effects."</p>
<p>That is an excellent point.  And like you said, it comes down to physicians over prescribing drugs and patients wanting to take the easy way out.</p>
<p>"And how many people go to their doctor to report minor side effects and get blown off? How many don't even bother to report them?"</p>
<p>Many don't.  That is another one of the reasons we have post market studies and clinical trials.  Unfortunately, these kinds of statistics can become skewed and biased, but that is another discussion that I could probably write a book on.</p>
<p>-Phex<br />
-3rd Year PharmD / MBA Candidate</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-19T01:10:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6769414</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6769414" />
    <title>Comment from modenastradale on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>modenastradale</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I was recently prescribed Levaquin for a sore throat. After the first dose, I had hallucinations and became agitated and nearly violent. We researched the drug online and learned of its serious side effects. I immediately ceased the drug and no longer will visit the physician who prescribed it (he gave me no warning whatsoever -- in fact, he wasn't even sure if my illness was bacterial).</p>
<p>Yikes.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-19T00:06:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6767089</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6767089" />
    <title>Comment from dreamsneverend on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>dreamsneverend</name>
        <uri>http://www.popnwave.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.popnwave.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>*cringe* Besides getting kicked in the nuts, the though of tendons rupturing makes me feel sick. I was on Levaquin for a few days after a septoplasty last month and thank god nothing popped for me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T22:41:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6766490</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6766490" />
    <title>Comment from nsv on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>nsv</name>
        <uri>http://nvaine.wordpress.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://nvaine.wordpress.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c6765826" rel="nofollow">Phexerian</a>: </p><blockquote>It's kinda like myopathy with statins (Lipitor or Zocor). It has a rate of 1 in 10,000 but people get really uppity about it.</blockquote>
<p>Of all the people who take statins, how many of them could get their cholesterol down by using diet and exercise, which generally have the horrible side effects of making you lose weight and feel and look better?</p>
<p>My mother was prescribed Lipitor with a cholesterol level of 185 and LDL LT 100.  WHY?  (Aside from the fact that her doctor is a bleeding idiot.)  To maintain, the idiot told her.  Is there some reason he couldn't have told her to try mallwalking three or four times a week?  Couldn't he have asked about her diet and suggested minor changes to be made?  Why prescribe a statin?</p>
<p>If half the people taking statins don't need them, we've doubled the number of people who will suffer side effects.  (And made the pharmaceutical companies even richer, but let's not go there.)  And how many people go to their doctor to report minor side effects and get blown off?  How many don't even bother to report them?</p>
<p>Statins are just one example, antibiotics are another.  Doctors are prescribing meds that aren't needed.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T22:19:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6766293</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6766293" />
    <title>Comment from Cerb on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cerb</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5026557/fda-warns-of-tendon+rupturing-antibiotics#c6764582" rel="nofollow">mjsager</a>:</p><br />
<p>We have been warned of the dangers of these drugs. Its literally drilled into our heads over and over in medical school. The fact remains, these are rare events for the most part. As the above poster mentioned, it is less than 1% in adult patients according to clinical trials and the benefit far outweighs the risks. <br />As for not treating a sinus infection, that is false. If an infection is bacterial, we pretty much always treat it. It so happens that most cases of acute sinusitis are of viral origin, but if there is reason to suspect it is bacterial, standard of care is to treat it with an antibiotic (Augmentin is usually firt line but flouroquinolones are frequently used and quite effective as well). Again, flouroquinolones are VERY GOOD, MOSTLY SAFE drugs. They aren't nukes of the antibiotic world, just good broad coverage abx.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T22:12:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6766172</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6766172" />
    <title>Comment from TheLemon on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>TheLemon</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c6765944" rel="nofollow">mjsager</a>: "And in my specific case, the doctor which prescribed the medicine absolutely denied that there was any connection between the side effects I was experiencing and the drug despite the fact that all the side effects were on the warning label."</p>
<p>When I had a severe reaction, the only reason I was taken seriously at the ER was because my doctor had experienced the exact same reaction herself when she took a sample pack of Levaquin for her own strep throat.  No one else in the ER believed it was even possible to get that sick from taking an antibiotic.  My primary was obviously doubting it , but eventually took the ER doc seriously.  All of this told me that 1) I was incredibly lucky to get the doc I did in the ER, and 2) most docs have NO IDEA how serious and real some of these side effects are.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T22:08:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6765944</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6765944" />
    <title>Comment from mjsager on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>mjsager</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If someone followed the problems with this antibiotic, you'd be surprised how far it went.</p>
<p>For example, most doctors receive only minimal payment for an office visit, so there is a pressure to see as many patients as possible and spend as little time with each patient. There is little time to discuss side effects. Many only make money on the tests they order.</p>
<p>Chinese catfish farmers use these antibiotics because the conditions there are pretty bad in the farms. The use of this antibiotic puts our catfish farmers at a disadvantage. Its illegal to use, but the FDA doesn't do any testing.</p>
<p>There is a financial incentive for drug companies to minimally discloses risks so their drug will be used during the patent window. Vioxx, etc etc etc etc.</p>
<p>Farmed salmon outside of the U.S. makes extensive use of these antibiotics, which weakens their effectiveness and puts our fish farming operations in at a disadvantage. It also harms the environment.</p>
<p>And in my specific case, the doctor which prescribed the medicine absolutely denied that there was any connection between the side effects I was experiencing and the drug despite the fact that all the side effects were on the warning label.</p>
<p>The pharmacists I talked to were completely unaware of the drug side effects. Like completely clueless. I think this can partially be attributed to the fact that CVS under staffs their pharmacies.</p>
<p>Now I'm not saying that these antibiotics are horrible. They are quite amazing, its just that they are over used. Real life needs a major crimes unit like from the wire.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T21:59:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6765826</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6765826" />
    <title>Comment from Phexerian on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phexerian</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>This side effect is one of the more rare ones with fluoroquinolones.  It has a rate of 3% vs the comparator group with a 95% confidence interval in patients under 17 years old.  With adult patients it is less than 1%.  Elderly patients I did not see any data on, however, my search was rather brief.</p>
<p>Physicians and Pharmacists don't tell you about every side effect of the drug.  If we did, we would be sitting there rattling off everything on a list for a few minutes.  We generally only tell you about the most common side effects.  This is why a drug insert comes with your medication the first time you get it.  If it doesn't, you need to get it from your pharmacy or switch pharmacies.</p>
<p>It's kinda like myopathy with statins (Lipitor or Zocor).  It has a rate of 1 in 10,000 but people get really uppity about it.  Myopathy can be really bad, but it can also be just a slight case.</p>
<p>Perhaps the FDA is putting this black box warning on it because they think they drug company skewed the data.  Perhaps it happens more than is reported in the clinical trials or post market studies.  It was quite a while that the FDA took to respond to their complaint.  However, one should realize that they are underfunded and understaffed.  This is not a defense for them, just a reason why it could have taken so long.  However, this is all speculation on my part.</p>
<p>Overall, Fluoroquinolones are good antibiotics.  They are first line generally for people who are allergic to penecillins and cephalosporins, and are also first line for many UTI and respiratory infections because they work well.</p>
<p>-Phex<br />
-3rd Year PharmD / MBA Candidate</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T21:54:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6765187</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6765187" />
    <title>Comment from SadSam on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>SadSam</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Ask your doctor for the PDR print out for any new drug and ask them to review it with you. Make sure your doctor knows what other drugs you take (prescription, over the counter and vitamins). Most likely the doctor will cover the most common side effects (headaches, upset tummy, things like that) but the dicussion may lead to a risk factor that you were not aware of. All drugs have side effects, the doctor should be picking the best drug for the illness while also balancing the side effects.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T21:30:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6764727</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6764727" />
    <title>Comment from LuckyEmmie on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>LuckyEmmie</name>
        <uri>http://city-salon.com/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://city-salon.com/blog">
        <![CDATA[<p>A neighbor of mine experienced a double achilles rupture after being on one of these antibiotics; he wasn't doing anything strenuous, just walking along... It's a scary thought, but all meds have side effects, and it's not really practical for a doctor to pull out a PDR and read it to you every time they prescribe you a med. That's why you have the option of consulting with a pharmacist, and why they give you those detailed inserts with your prescription.</p>
<p>I was on Cipro just last week after a nasty reaction to Macrobid, and I made sure to read over the insert. The risk of tendon rupture was plainly stated. I'm not sure what more there is to be done, other than having a warning on the packaging.</p>
<p>In response to @<a href="#c6763235" rel="nofollow">crazybutch</a>: , I would think that a warning to contact a doctor ASAP for a specific reaction <i> is </i> an indication that the reaction is a big deal.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T21:13:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6764582</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6764582" />
    <title>Comment from mjsager on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>mjsager</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c6763374" rel="nofollow">Cerb</a>:</p>
<p>The problem is not that these drugs have side effects. Its not that these side effects are potentially dangerous.</p>
<p>The problem is that people are experiencing side effects at a higher than advertised rate. That doctors are using these serious antibiotics for things like, a sinus infection, which for the most part is pretty ridiculous as there are much much safer drugs around for those sorts of things.</p>
<p>The doctors underestimate the level of harm that can be caused because they haven't been warned.</p>
<p>I'm on the yahoo group of people who have had these reactions, and a majority of these people should have never been prescribed these drugs. Seriously, Cipro or Levaquin for a sinus infection?  Unless its a resistant strain its like using a nuclear missile when you really just need a fly trap.</p>
<p>There are a couple thousand people on that list, most everyone with a pretty serious reaction.</p>
<p>I've been in excruciating pain for 6 months because of this drug and the doctors I talked to expressed the same attitude as you except at the university hospital.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T21:09:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6764013</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6764013" />
    <title>Comment from texasannie on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>texasannie</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>The list of drugs citd in the article is a list of brand names (and one manufacturer). Some of these can be given in generic form, so I've listed the generic names below. Also, Oscient is not a drug; it is the company that manufactures Factive. Floxin and Noroxin are two different drugs rather than being one dug with a wacky name. There should have been a comma in there.</p><br />
<p>Cipro = ciprofloxacin<br />Levaquin = levofloxacin<br />Avelox = moxifloxacin<br />Factive = gemifloxacin mesylate<br />Proquin XR = ciprofloxacin hydrochloride<br />Floxin = Ofloxacin<br />Noroxin = Norfloxacin</p><br />
<p>As others have said, most medications can have serious side effects, so it's always important to monitor yourself for unusual side effects while taking a drug. These warnings are good because they let you know of specific problems to look out for, but they shouldn't discourage most people from taking medications as prescribed. Tendon rupture sucks if it happens, but not treating a serious infection (which is what these drugs treat) can be much worse.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T20:46:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6763602</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6763602" />
    <title>Comment from Imaginary_Friend on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Imaginary_Friend</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Check out what others think about a medication before you take it at askapatient:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.askapatient.com/" rel="nofollow">[www.askapatient.com]</a></p>
<p>The reviews for Cipro are terrible:<br />
<a href="http://www.askapatient.com/viewrating.asp?drug=19537&amp;name=CIPRO" rel="nofollow">[www.askapatient.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T20:30:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6763374</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6763374" />
    <title>Comment from Cerb on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cerb</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Whoever said that there isn't a drug without a side effect is spot on. It's why you can't just stroll into a pharmacy and ask for whatever you want. The safety profile of some drugs is downright scary - it's not that they are bad drugs, it's that they are drugs and drugs can have very nasty side effects in some people. I really don't consider this side effect all that bad considering some other possible side effects of other drugs. When we decide to prescribe this, or any, drug it's because we think the danger of not treating is much worse than the danger of treating. I will still use flouroquinolones, they are fantastic drugs for most people. <br />Also, it should be noted as I see some people freaking out on here about knee pain, etc following abx use. The VAST VAST majority of tendon ruptures occur at the achilles tendon. And when it happens...you'll know.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T20:21:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6763235</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6763235" />
    <title>Comment from crazybutch on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>crazybutch</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c6761065" rel="nofollow">alice_bunnie</a>: on the monograph they gave me for cipro, they say contact your doctor asap if you have tendon pain.they don't say to stop taking it, they don't say what it might mean.... they make it not seem like a big deal.</p>
<p>this sucks. i'm taking the exact medicine in the picture right now. but i guess it might be better than me taking nothing. it's just that i'm pretty sure it will hurt if my tendon snaps, so this has me on edge....</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T20:15:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6762118</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6762118" />
    <title>Comment from jkpwife on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>jkpwife</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>My husband was taking the Cipro and his knee became tender and swollen and his gout in his big toe became so bad he could hardly walk.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T19:26:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6761769</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6761769" />
    <title>Comment from mjsager on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>mjsager</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've been dealing with a Reaction to Levaquin for 6 months now. It absolutely fucking sucks.</p>
<p>I have the following:</p>
<p>neuropathy, which is numbness / tingling all over my body<br />
Joint pain - at times I can barely walk <br />
Tendon problems<br />
Floaters</p>
<p>Now you might think that this only affects me. Its cost my medical plan probably $5k so far.</p>
<p>The other thing is that the doctors I encountered were absolutely clueless. So far as to absolutely deny the drug had anything to do with my ankle pain. Which if you read the side effects is listed as a serious side effect. It was only when I went to a major university hospital did anyone believe anything I was complaining about.</p>
<p>If you google joint pain + cipro there are almost a million hits, and if you ask your doctor about it they will deny there is any connection.</p>
<p>The worst part is that I should have never been given this drug. A much cheaper and safer drug was available ( $15 vs $800+ for a 60 day supply ).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T19:07:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6761065</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6761065" />
    <title>Comment from alice_bunnie on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>alice_bunnie</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>You know people there are side effects of every drug and you either read the monograph or ask the pharmacist.  This is why when there was the big anthrax scare and everyone was screaming that they wanted Cipro available to every person everywhere we were being cautioned that Cipro was a very potent antibiotic with very strong side effects that they didn't just give out to everyone for everything.</p>
<p>I have taken Levaquin and had a nasty reaction to the sun.  You might remember they had an article that mentioned it here a while back.  I had read the warning, but you never know if it's going to happen to you.  And, I DO remember reading the monograph about sun sensitivity, but I didn't know it'd be like that.  And, I DO specifically remember tendon rupturing and I thought "WTF?"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T18:27:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6760963</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6760963" />
    <title>Comment from Juliekins on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Juliekins</name>
        <uri>http://ecclecticgeekness.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ecclecticgeekness.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c6758110" rel="nofollow">nsv</a>: <br />
I can take the ones you mentioned too.  I think it was a bigger issue when I was a kid--more drugs have come out since then that aren't penicillin derivatives.</p>
<p>@<a href="#c6760547" rel="nofollow">beavis88</a>:<br />
Yikes!  That really knocks out a big range of drugs.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T18:20:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6760613</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6760613" />
    <title>Comment from d4ygl0down on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>d4ygl0down</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Last summer I contracted a nasty strain of strep throat, which after a round of antibiotics turned into a bronchitis. I went to urgent care, and they gave me Levaquin. After taking that round, it turned into a sinus infection. I went to my general physician (in Columbus Ohio, I recently moved to Cleveland), and told him what was going on (at this time I had been sick for almost a month). He prescribed another longer round of Levaquin. Fast forward a few weeks later and while I'm working my shoulder and back begin to hurt and my hand goes numb. I have been through over a month of physical therapy to cure this (and $500 out of my own pocket). If I had known this was a side effect I wouldn't have taken it and demanded something else. No one told me this would happen!!!!</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T17:51:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6760593</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6760593" />
    <title>Comment from polyeaster on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>polyeaster</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>This is concerning...last year I took Levaquin after a dog bite, and it was never mentioned. Besides the tendon-rupturing risk, the drug also makes many people have psychotic dreams:(</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T17:48:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6760547</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6760547" />
    <title>Comment from beavis88 on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>beavis88</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c6757751" rel="nofollow">Juliekins</a>: Meh, penicillin sucks anyway. Try being allergic to cephalosporins - the first thing doctors reach for to treat any sort of semi-serious infection is, you guessed it, a fluoroquinolone. Last time I took Levaquin the tendon-rupture thing was definitely noted as a possible side effect in the (long, long) drug information sheet.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T17:39:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6760363</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6760363" />
    <title>Comment from TheLemon on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>TheLemon</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.askapatient.com/viewrating.asp?drug=20635&amp;name=LEVAQUIN" rel="nofollow">[www.askapatient.com]</a></p>
<p>Oops, forgot the link.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T17:04:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6760359</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6760359" />
    <title>Comment from TheLemon on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>TheLemon</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.askapatient.com/viewrating.asp?drug=20635&amp;name=LEVAQUIN" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
<p>Patient-reported stories about one of the quinolones (Levaquin) and its side-effects.  It's about time the FDA gave it a black box.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T17:04:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6760335</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6760335" />
    <title>Comment from kable2 on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>kable2</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>because the government is controled by big business and their lobbyists. When they give big dollars to a member, they will vote with their wallets. Thats why.</p><br />
<p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/5026557/fda-warns-of-tendon+rupturing-antibiotics#c6757629" rel="nofollow">azntg</a>:</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T17:00:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6760330</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6760330" />
    <title>Comment from evslin on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>evslin</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c6758517" rel="nofollow">dinobuddy</a>: I was going to say, some of these medication names sound like characters in a cartoon or something.</p>
<p>"Today I'm going to take over the city, and there's nothing you can do to stop me, Avelox!"</p>
<p>"Guys!  We have to stop Floxin Noroxin before he destroys everything!  Let's get to headquarters right away!!"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T16:57:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6760312</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6760312" />
    <title>Comment from TheLemon on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>TheLemon</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've personally had a terrible reaction to a quinolone (just one pill!) that sent me to the ER.  It surprises me that more people aren't aware of the risk.  Ruptured tendons are only one of the possibilities with these drugs.  They cross the blood-brain barrier.</p>
<p>You may trust your doctors and your pharmacist, but any time you take a new med, you should first look it up online so you are more clear on the risks vs. benefits.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T16:53:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6759854</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6759854" />
    <title>Comment from katyggls on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>katyggls</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've taken Cipro and Levaquin and never ruptured anything (well except a few blood vessels when I saw the doctor's bill). I think as huadpe says, when you weigh the small possibility of a rare side effect like this against doing nothing for an infection, these drugs don't seem like such a bad idea.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T14:41:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6759578</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6759578" />
    <title>Comment from scerwup on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>scerwup</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>That's just disturbing</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T13:18:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6759104</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6759104" />
    <title>Comment from nsv on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>nsv</name>
        <uri>http://nvaine.wordpress.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://nvaine.wordpress.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c6758966" rel="nofollow">huadpe</a>: I don't have a problem with my doctor checking reference books.  They're human beings and can't know everything.  Unfortunately, they usually don't check.  Can't turn over ten patients an hour if you're wasting time looking things up, can you?</p>
<p>The pharmacist would seem to be the next line of defense, but I've never gotten good information out of a pharmacist unless I had done my research and had good questions to ask.  When the pharmacy tech snaps "Got any questions?" while looking past me at the next person in line, I would never (until now) have come up with "Will this medication cause my tendons to rupture?"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T11:10:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6758966</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6758966" />
    <title>Comment from huadpe on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>huadpe</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I see this as potentially serious, and a very good reason for prescription drugs to be prescription based.  Yes, it has potentially dangerous side effects, but those should be weighed against the cost of doing nothing, and a medical professional should decide what's best.  Not treating an infection can be far more dangerous than these side effects, and if cipro is the safest antibiotic that won't cause an allergic reaction, then even if it might cause joint problems, it might be a good idea to prescribe it.</p>
<p>I don't see the fuss over a "black box" warning.  Patients shouldn't be picking up high-strength antibiotics off the shelf.  And doctors should know the side effects of what they're prescribing, and check a reference volume if they're not sure.  I don't have a problem with my MD checking the Merck Manual to make sure I get the right dosage and info.</p>
<p>I am not a doctor, and this is not medical advice.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T10:45:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6758724</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6758724" />
    <title>Comment from JennQPublic on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>JennQPublic</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>When my mother recently scraped her finger they gave her Cipro to prevent tetanus. Neither the doctor or the pharmacist told her this was a possible (however unlikely) side effect. I found out from the internet.</p>
<p>She chose to take it anyway, and she was fine, but I still feel like she should have been told by a health professional, not the interwebs.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T10:02:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6758517</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6758517" />
    <title>Comment from dinobuddy on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>dinobuddy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I just like saying Floxin Noroxin. It really rolls off the tongue. Just like the enormous tendon-rupturing pill it refers to!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T09:37:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6758188</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6758188" />
    <title>Comment from TechnoDestructo on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>TechnoDestructo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c6757629" rel="nofollow">azntg</a>:</p>
<p>See: every article about academic cheating.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T08:57:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6758110</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6758110" />
    <title>Comment from nsv on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>nsv</name>
        <uri>http://nvaine.wordpress.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://nvaine.wordpress.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c6757751" rel="nofollow">Juliekins</a>: I'm allergic to penicillin too, and there are lots of other antibiotics I can take.  I usually end up with one of the macrolides like Erythromycin or Zithromax.  Do you have other allergies to deal with?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T08:48:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6758025</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6758025" />
    <title>Comment from Hongfiately on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Hongfiately</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c6757677" rel="nofollow">Cerb</a>: Right.  This isn't news if you've read about what you are putting into your body.  I follow a regular exercise regimen and so I have to be mindful of side-effects.  Example: You don't want to take something with photosensitivey as a side-effect and then go out and run in the heat of the day.</p>
<p>Same thing applies with Cipro, which I was taking last fall.  I read through the literature that came with my script and there was what I considered adequate warning about tendon damage so I throttled back on my running and weights for the 10 days I was on it.</p>
<p>Always read through the information you get from the pharmacist.  If you don't get any stapled to your script or as a sticker on the label, ask for it.  If you still don't get any, get a new pharmacy.  You can also go to a site like RxList and check it out there.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rxlist.com/" rel="nofollow">[rxlist.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T08:39:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6757956</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6757956" />
    <title>Comment from mir777 on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>mir777</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Crap! I am hurting right now (tendonitis) and wonder if it's all the Cipro.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T08:32:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6757808</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6757808" />
    <title>Comment from SOhp101 on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>SOhp101</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c6757677" rel="nofollow">Cerb</a>: Unfortunately not everyone has gone to medical school =(.</p>
<p>Plus you'd be surprised at the level of knowledge that doctors lack when it comes to prescriptions. Not that I'm pointing the finger, since it is quite an overwhelming area to try and keep up with.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T08:17:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6757751</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6757751" />
    <title>Comment from Juliekins on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Juliekins</name>
        <uri>http://ecclecticgeekness.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ecclecticgeekness.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Holy crap.  Cipro is one of the few antibiotics I can take.  I'm allergic to penicillin.  Good thing when I'm on it I've been too sick to work out.  It sounds like a nasty injury waiting to happen.</p>
<p>I highly recommend not being allergic to penicillin.  It's an expensive pain in the ass.  :P</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T08:12:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6757677</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6757677" />
    <title>Comment from Cerb on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cerb</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I don't really see what the big deal with having the "black box warning" is. We have been well aware of the effects of flouroquinolones on tendons for some time. It's one of the classic possible side effects taught in medical school and the reason we really avoid using them in children. Luckily the side effect is quite rare and the safety profile is otherwise very good. I've yet to see a case of it (although we had a possible case in a geriatric patient with contracture of his hip).</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T08:04:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6757629</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6757629" />
    <title>Comment from azntg on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>azntg</name>
        <uri>n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>Why do we always have to go to litigation (or show up on the Consumerist) before things are on their way of getting done right?</p>
<p>One nice society we live in.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T08:00:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557-comment:6757574</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.5026557" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/07/fda-warns-of-tendon-rupturing-antibiotics.html#c6757574" />
    <title>Comment from superlayne on 2008-07-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>superlayne</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>That is some serious Saw stuff. To cure yourself you have to drink a bucket of tendon melting antibiotics or something.</p>
<p>How does this happen, biologically, though?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-18T07:56:26Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



