Wachovia's screw-ups also affected people who ARE NOT Wachovia customers. So, choosing a bank that ISN'T Wachovia is not automatic safety against Wachovia.

I'm not arguing that TicketMaster is abusing a monopoly power. My point is, how much damage is it REALLY doing. The product that TM offers is a 100% non-essential luxury product. In the grand scheme of things, literally 0% of the population NEEDS a TicketMaster or comparable company. That, if nothing else, makes it a non-necessity.

Wachovia, like all banks, are pretty much a life necessity, and people do trust their lives to banks like Wachovia. So when Wachovia abuses their position or otherwise screws up, it impacts the lifeblood of a large number of people. That, IMO, makes it FAR worse than anything that TM could possibly do.

Also, the scope and duration of the issue at hand: Wachovia has only been failing for a short time, and will fix the issue (probably?). Ticketmaster has been an awful monopoly since I was 10 and bought tickets to Steve Miller - and there's no indication they're going to get any better (if anything, they'll keep tacking more/higher fees until some legal official takes them to task.)

Again: It's a NON-ESSENTIAL LUXURY. If you don't like the way TM does business, don't buy from them. It won't affect your ability to live, have a home, feed your children, etc if TM charges a small fortune for a concert ticket that you don't purchase. But if Wachovia screws up (as they did) then it DOES affect those things. You want to talk about scope, then talk about the real-world impact that these two companies have on people. TM fleeces people with disposable income. Wachova screwed over the working class for a huge amount of money (and privacy).

I fail to see how TM could even vaguely be considered the worse company here. It reminds me of when rich people get all pissed off because their favorite five star restaurant doesn't have their favorite brand of caviar, while at the same time some homeless guy across the street is rummaging through a trash can looking for a pizza crust.

And to those that are sneering at those of us that like live music - you're sad, lonely and artless people. Don't hate those of us that aren't.

Does that make Wachovia's crime lesser? I don't believe so, but it did perform the greater crime on a lesser scale than Ticketmaster, who continues it's bad practices today with no intention of stopping.

Getting screwed by ticketmaster equals out to not getting to see a show or having to fork out an extra $20-$100.

The scam that Wachovia is running with equals out to people losing their entire banking accounts, getting crushed by bounce fees, having their credit scores ruined and just generally being raped and pillaged while Wachovia collects money from obviously fraudulent accounts.

Ticketmaster's opperation is pretty up front... you want this? you pay this!

Wachovia is back-dooring folks by profitting from fraud.

"the bank, in fact, solicited business from companies it knew had been accused of telemarketing crimes."

I don't like Wachovia, I have heard a lot of bad stories. But I also don't bank with Wachovia because I know how bad they can be ....but generally, you can choose to bank somewhere else.

Wow, so far I'm 3 for 3 as far as the majority votes. We should have a contest to see who guesses the most winners. The prize could be a bag of discount coupons, and the executive e-mail addresses of a company of your choice.

@sgodun: "Those who don't have Wachovia near them, or who don't bank with Wachovia, and therefore vote for TicketMaster are particularly weak."

I think a failure to institute policy is slightly less bad than *intentionally* muscling your monopoly power to rake your customers over the coals.
Also, the scope and duration of the issue at hand: Wachovia has only been failing for a short time, and will fix the issue (probably?). Ticketmaster has been an awful monopoly since I was 10 and bought tickets to Steve Miller - and there's no indication they're going to get any better (if anything, they'll keep tacking more/higher fees until some legal official takes them to task.)

@ starrion
Pot/kettle, kettle/pot.
There's nothing else I can say to you that other's haven't already said better.

Ticketmaster's been screwing people for years. While identity theft is on the rise now (and Wachovia sure isn't helping), I was shut out of many a show in the late 90s because Ticketmaster strangely only had obscured seating as soon as the tickets were on sale. -high school sadness-

I have to go with the company that rips you off even if you don't do business with them. Wachovia.

Those who don't have Wachovia near them, or who don't bank with Wachovia, and therefore vote for TicketMaster are particularly weak. "Because it didn't happen to me, I think they're okay." The US didn't get involved in WW2 until 1941. I guess that means the Germans were pretty swell guys up until that point, eh?

TicketMaster abuses a monopoly position in a non-essential, non-critical, purely-luxury-driven market. Wachovia screws a lot of people in an essential, life-affecting market whether they're a Wachovia customer or not.

@Ex_EA_Slave:

Losing my temper at Aaron was not cool, but having had people raid my bank account was infuriating. Moreover Wachovia wasn't not trying to stop fraud, they noted in internal documents that allowing the scammers to operate was very profitable in fees, and they opted to effectively provide bank access to identity thieves /fraudsters.

I've gone to events with tickets bought at Ticketmonster. While it's infuriating, I was aware of the cost and opted to pay it to see the show. At least Ticketmaster didn't try to empty my bank account.

@starrion: I think we can all agree that both are evil. I think its annoying to belittle someone for picking one company or the other. I think we can have a civilized debate here (until the PR reps start poisoning everything). I think as others have mentioned, its matter of how many, how much, how long, people are affected. Almost all of us are impacted by TM's monopoly (at least if you go to a concert, sporting event, opera, play, etc). Wachovia's actions have impacted fewer and so it tends to get less votes. My view is that TM is intentionally being evil while Wachovia is being negligently evil (if that makes sense)and so I voted for TM.

I'd say ticketmaster consistantly screws over more people than wachovia does..... so ticketmaster gets my vote.

@DrGirlfriend: I see this as the beauty of the system. If you've been screwed by Wachovia, or know someone who has, then you will be more inclined to vote for them. However, most people have only read about the Wachovia crap on the internet, so are less familiar.

In general, I support the vagueness of the poll, as it lets you, the voter, decide what the poll means to you.

/Note to everyone who is speaking about Ticketmaster in relation to Hannah Montana or Britney Spears concert tickets: Here in Louisville, Ticketmaster controls the Ballet, Opera, Musicals, Orchestra performances, (big name) comedy acts, and plays in addition to normal pop and rock concerts.

Which part of posting on the 'big people sites' is belittling other posters for not being mature? AaronZ obviously cares more about going to see his favorite band, lecturer, or event more than some bank doing little to stop fraud. He, like the majority of people on this site, have probably never been affected by Wachovia. He also, like the majority of people on this site, has probably been anally ravaged by Ticketmaster for the past 25 years. Does that make AaronZ less mature than you? No,it does not. Apathy and immaturity are two completely different things, but I'm sure someone as obviously learned and worldly as you already knows that.

Till then, count on a cable company losing this (unless the hire the same "viral marketing/PR" firms, then watch out. . .)

@johnva: Agreed...that was the problem I saw with the menu Foods vs Comcast matchup. "Worst company" doesn't mean the same to everyone. And it's not that it's the poll's fault, because with most polls comes a degree of sujectivity. But you start to see that disconnect in the comments.

@AaronZ:

Unfortunately, it appears that you are not paying attention. Wachovia is assisting in defrauding the customers of OTHER banks. Pick a bank. Get a checking account. Thief gets your checking account number. Thief processes transaction THROUGH WACHOVIA taking money from your checking account. Wachovia is notified - and does nothing.

And if you think going to concerts is a priority - then you might want to consider growing up before posting on big people sites.

From the comments, it appears that a lot of people just didn't read the Wachovia story.

I think the general problem with these polls is that it's poorly defined what we're voting on. Are we voting on worst overall, worst customer service, worst single horror story, etc? So people always argue over the same general principles on every one of these matchups.

To the people asking how Ticketmaster is winning;
Do you have any concept of the power of choice?
Drive down any street in any neighborhood and you'll see a dozen different banks.
But try to buy tickets to ANY show, and you have ONE option, ticketmaster - who in turn basically rape their customers with monopolistic fees. Charge you to receive tickets via e-mail? Charge you to print them out yourself? Hell, even Comcast has competitors.
There's only one choice here, and it's ticketmaster.

@starrion:
"Nobody is over a barrel with ticketmaster. You don't HAVE to go to a concert."

Oh, shut up. You don't HAVE to put your money in a bank either, you can put it under your mattress. If you want to offer a counter argument, try to come up with something more realistic than "you don't have to" do anything fun.

The problems with Ticketmaster are problems with a luxury service. You don't lose the ability to eat or make a mortgage payment because you couldn't get a ticket to the Britney Spears show. In the grand scheme of things these problems amount to little more than a person's ability to wisely spend their excess income.

Wachovia's problems are far more dangerous. If people are defrauded of their money due to Wachovia's problems, then they may lose their house or their car or may not be able to feed themselves or their children until the issue has been resolved. Think about that: You can't buy a concert ticket, or you can't make the mortgage payment on your house. Yet, Ticketmaster is worse?

It blows my mind that people think that Ticketmaster is the greater evil. Wachovia is easily the heavier gorilla here.

Is it wrong that I actually like Wachovia? I've been with them for 10 years...never had a problem. Every other bank I've used (living overseas and second account) have had major problems. As far as big banks go, they're pretty good. Granted, I've never had to deal with any fraud or anything like that...

...and here comes the bitching!

I went with Wachovia, for:
A) The sheer amount of money involved compared to Ticketmaster, and
B) I'm convinced that even if Ticketmaster went away tomorrow, someone else would jump into its place and do the same thing, so I don't see Ticketmaster as being in an exclusive group.

If you're a Wachovia customer, that's pretty much entirely your choice. There is zero reason you can't switch to another bank.

What in the heck is that graphic? With the red outline? Is it 2 knights fighting? Seriously, somebody help me...

what's wrong with you people?

@starrion: you don't HAVE to use wachovia either. People WANT to go to concerts, either music or comedy or some other and then they HAVE to use ticketmaster.

I think Ticketmaster is winning simply because more people have been pissed at them for longer. I know I hate their guts.

Don't like Wachovia? Bank somewhere else. Don't like Ticketmaster? Can't go to the show. Lack of market choices here makes this round quite easy.

I never saw the problem with scalpers. It's no different than buying a Nintendo Wii and selling it for more later. Obviously there wouldn't be a market for scalped tickets unless people were willing to pay.

Why did I vote for Ticketmaster? I look out of my office window here on the Sunset Strip and I see seven different banks (Wells Fargo is downstairs, BofA and Citibank is across the street, City National is down a block and etc) and only one corporate headquarters of ticketmaster. I hate the lack of competition Ticketmaster enjoys unlike local banks.

@ARP:

You also have the choice to NOT go to a show...boycott them all and force ticketmaster to comply....if they can't sell ANY tickets, they will have to change their ways...but people don't unite anymore in this country and take a stand; instead just paying the fees and letting them continue to rip you off..

BTW it is not a matter of "avoiding" Wachovia. They process fraud transactions that take money from your bank account whether you bank with them or your friendly neighborhood credit union.

If your CU then corrects it, and tells Wachovia "Hey, that's fraud!", Wachovia ignores them, bills the fraudster for the chargeback, AND STILL PROCESSES THE NEXT TRANSACTION!!!onez.

You cannot avoid them which is why Wachovia, Comcast, AAA, and Halliburton should be contending for the finals.

This poll reminds me of Lewis Black's Root of All Evil on Comedy Central. Personally, I think Ticketmaster is winning, because most of us have learned to steer away from Wachovia (Wachovia doesn't even serve my area), while Ticketmaster has a near monopoly.

The tickets are supposed to arrive no later than 48 hours before the show; they didn't. The confirmation email I received when I bought the tickets stated they would send me a notice email when the tickets were ready to be mailed out; I received no such notice. 30 hours before the show and I was still ticketless.

I called the Ticketmaster contact number given on their web site, and according to my cell phone it took 31 minutes and 48 seconds to complete my business with them. The vast majority of that time was spent on hold, wondering if my battery would last. Once I finally got to speak with someone they handled my problem quickly and well. I got a voucher to have my tickets reprinted at the venue box office, and invalidated the original tickets so if they had been stolen, the thief couldn't use them. The parking pass could not be reprinted, so I got a full refund of the amount for that. But of course without it I did still have a parking problem.

@milty45654: I don't think its simply our infantile thought process at work.

With banks, we do have some choice. Granted, the choices suck, but we have it. So we could switch to a more secure bank/credit union if there was a problem. With TM, we have no choice. That's the source of frustration with so many here.

I work down the street from IAC otherwise known as Ticketmaster. I always curse their name as I walk by their stainless stell facade on the Sunset Strip in West Hollywood on my way to the office. I kid, it's great they are in my neighborhood we can use all that extra tax revenue they generate on those inflated ticket prices.

Seriously though, Ticketmaster is only one of the factors that makes it a pain in the ass to go to a show. You can blame the big talent agencies (ICM, William Morris, CAA etc) working toghether with the promoters like Clearchannel & Live Nation signing exclusive deals with artists to lock up revenues in one nice package which jacks up prices due to the lack of competition.

Are you serious? Why is ticketmaster winning?

Again, our entertainment needs trump our need to be decent caring humans.

I just spent $15 in convenience fees for a $20 Flogging Molly show.

Yep. There was a flogging molly / Dropkick Murphies concert around here last year, tickets were $40 to start off with, you could ONLY get them through ticketmaster, and once you added fees, it cost something like $65.

@milty45654:
or you could be completely off the mark, missing a major theme this site and the users here have made very clear.

You get what you deserve, and have no right to bitch, when you use a bank.

No clue how the hell ticketmaster is winning this one...i can only assume ticket prices are more important to the readers than the protection of their money and identity....with which without you would not be able to buy your tickets with....can there be another version of the bracket...something like "worst company contest for 8th graders"?

@starrion: I understand your point. We don't have to have a lot of things in this world, credit cards, phones, TV's, Cable, gas service, etc. to SURVIVE. But I tend to think about in terms of what a regular person usually has and does. One of those things is ocassionaly attending a concert of some sort. In addition, whole point of capitalism is that there should be meaningful choice/ competition. My view is if there is not or if industries collude to make identical rules, there should be appropriate regulation to make things "fair."

I voted for ticketmaster because of their monopoly status, their unfair business practices of "allowing" scalpers to buy all the ticket, and the fact that I just spent $15 in convenience fees for a $20 Flogging Molly show.

Perhaps I'd be more sympathetic if they made full disclosure that, "our system is not fair, we allow scalpers to buy all the tickets, we charge whatever we want, and we force exclusivity agreements on venues." then I mighthave a different opinion.

Exactly. I can choose where I bank, I can't choose where I buy concert tickets. Therein lies the problem.

It especially irks me that even if I go to the venue's box office I have to deal with Ticketmaster and their bullshit fees. Granted, fees are less if you go this route, but it should be nothing.

I voted TicketMaster.
Only company I know of thats legally allowed to charge $24 for tickets they advertise as $15.

i hate them, so very very much.

The $10 conveinence charged tacked on tickets isn't very convenient. It's ridiculous that a ticket marked for $35 ends up costing $55. And to buy a floor ticket to any half-decent band you have to be online at the time when they go on sale or they sell out in 5 minutes because of scalpers.

I can understand the logic -- people are more likely to vote for a company that they have directly interacted with, so banks and the like (aside from perhaps the public punching bag that is BoA) may get smaller vote counts than they otherwise would if everybody were subjected to their crap.

Nobody is over a barrel with ticketmaster. You don't HAVE to go to a concert.

Wachovia on the other hand, knowingly profitted from scammers who were looting people's bank accounts. Ticketmaster = bad, Wachovia = EVIL.

Which is why I don't go to concerts.

Wachovia is just incompetent more than outright evil.

Ouuu...it looks like we may have our first upset of the opening rounds!

*Wachovia

Stolen identity thieves? Sounds bad!

Seriously, I had to vote for Ticketmaster as I have had nothing but great service from Wachivia.