<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-24T16:19:41Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for New Report Says FCC Fails At Tracking Customer Complaints</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=368252" title="New Report Says FCC Fails At Tracking Customer Complaints" />
    <published>2008-03-15T04:45:29Z</published>
    <updated>2008-03-15T05:11:57Z</updated>
    <title>New Report Says FCC Fails At Tracking Customer Complaints</title>
    <summary>--&gt; The Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a new report yesterday that says that while the FCC processes about 95% of the complaints that come in, it takes some sort of enforcement action in only about 9% of them. &quot;The GAO said it was unable to determine why the [other] investigations were closed without action because &apos;FCC does not systematically collect these data.&apos;&quot; The FCC uses five separate databases and &quot;about 46,000 paper files&quot; to track complaints, and the GAO said &quot;made it difficult to get answers to basic questions like how long it takes the agency to close an investigation and the total dollar amount it assesses in fines.&quot;</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Chris Walters</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Horror Stories" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img alt="con_pilesofboxes.jpg" src="http://consumerist.com/images/resources/2008/03/con_pilesofboxes.jpg" width="178" height="214" class="left" />--> The Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a new report yesterday that says that while the FCC processes about 95% of the complaints that come in, it takes some sort of enforcement action in <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hly98QypIrMddy9Wot1Fach88JtQD8VCJ8QO1">only about 9% of them</a>. "The GAO said it was unable to determine why the [other] investigations were closed without action because 'FCC does not systematically collect these data.'" The FCC uses <b>five separate databases</b> and "about 46,000 paper files" to track complaints, and the GAO said "made it difficult to get answers to basic questions like how long it takes the agency to close an investigation and the total dollar amount it assesses in fines."</p>

<p>Other interesting findings from the study:</p>

<ul><li>Complaints rose by 40% from 2003 to 2006</li><li>"Telemarketers generated the most, 178,079 out of 454,373 complaints.</li><li>Billing rates for both wireline and wireless telephone providers were second, accounting for 117,875 complaints.</li></ul>

<p><a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hly98QypIrMddy9Wot1Fach88JtQD8VCJ8QO1">"Report Faults FCC on Complaint Tracking"</a> [Associated Press] <br />
(Photo: <a href="http://www.gettyimages.com">Getty</a>)</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:5200262</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c5200262" />
    <title>Comment from toobadsprint on 2008-04-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>toobadsprint</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I totally agree. This is my response from the fcc after reporting telemarketing calls.</p><br />
<p>The National Do-Not-Call Registry is maintained by the Federal Trade<br />Commission and not by the Federal Communications Commission. If your<br />name has been on the list for at least 31 days, telemarketing calls should<br />stop.</p><br />
<p>Based on the information which you submitted, you are a Sprint/Nextel<br />customer. An established business relationship exists if you have made<br />an inquiry, application, purchase, or transaction regarding products or<br />services offered by the person or company making calls.</p><br />
<p>The business relationship is only in effect for 18 months after your<br />last business transaction or 3 months after your last inquiry or<br />application. After that, any calls placed by that person or company are<br />considered telephone solicitations and will be subject to the Do-Not-Call<br />rules.</p><br />
<p>You have the right to ask Sprint not to contact you but they are not<br />violating Do-Not-Call rules if you are their customer.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-15T22:12:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4737612</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4737612" />
    <title>Comment from ToddGR on 2008-03-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>ToddGR</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Here's a link to the GAO Report: <a href="http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08125.pdf" rel="nofollow">[www.gao.gov]</a></p>
<p>And to a Ars Technica post the subject: <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080316-fcc-living-in-the-dark-ages-a-threat-to-net-neutrality-aims.html" rel="nofollow">[arstechnica.com]</a></p>
<p>Basically, the incompetence of the FCC knows no bound.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-18T00:30:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4721487</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4721487" />
    <title>Comment from mac-phisto on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>mac-phisto</name>
        <uri>http://n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4720708" rel="nofollow">noquarter</a>: well, that accounts for 0.05%...where's the other 8.95%?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-16T04:04:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4720708</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4720708" />
    <title>Comment from noquarter on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>noquarter</name>
        <uri>http://</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't want to imply that anecdotal evidence trumps statistics, but:</p>
<p>When Cingular tried to screw me (long story, not relevant), my complaint to the BBB went ignored, my complaint to the Attorney General of MD didn't get a response for 4 months, and my complaint to the FCC got someone from the office of the president at Cingular to call, apologize, and refund my money within 10 days.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-16T01:32:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4719367</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4719367" />
    <title>Comment from backbroken on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>backbroken</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>9% isn't that bad considering the FCC is extremely busy trying to raise everyone's kids.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T21:24:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4718944</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4718944" />
    <title>Comment from Swervo on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Swervo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>After reading a whole series of FCC complaints at a site that collects government docs via the FOIA on shows like The Daily Show, Family Guy, The Simpsons, etc, I'm rather happy to hear that they ignore most of 'em.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T19:41:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4718543</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4718543" />
    <title>Comment from mac-phisto on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>mac-phisto</name>
        <uri>http://n/a</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://n/a">
        <![CDATA[<p>listen everybody, let's cut them a little slack here. they have some serious business they're attending to now - auctioning off our airwaves to private companies. they don't have time to listen to joe blow to complain that he's repeatedly being overcharged on his cell phone bill.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T16:33:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4717503</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4717503" />
    <title>Comment from ageshin on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>ageshin</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The FCC is not interested in doing its job, but it is interested in encourageing those who it is required to regulate to do their thing, and that is to ignore the public.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T10:04:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4717373</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4717373" />
    <title>Comment from ezacharyk on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>ezacharyk</name>
        <uri>http://www.ezknight.net/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ezknight.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This actually makes sense. Considering the vast majority of FCC complaints originate from the PTC. I am pretty sure that they account for about 91% of all the complaints sent to the FCC.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T09:49:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4716722</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4716722" />
    <title>Comment from theblackdog on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>theblackdog</name>
        <uri>http://theblackdog2071.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://theblackdog2071.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>The easiest way to make sure your FCC complaint is read is to throw in the words "Howard Stern", "Baba Booey", or "Bubba the Love Sponge".  I guarantee it will be read, even if you're bitching about Comcast and their packet shaping.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T08:53:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4715541</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4715541" />
    <title>Comment from RustysNailed on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>RustysNailed</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c4715534" rel="nofollow">RustysNailed</a>: yeah, who doesnt like boobs on national television?  Communists, thats who!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T06:58:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4715534</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4715534" />
    <title>Comment from RustysNailed on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>RustysNailed</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>But really, the FCC sucks, so eff them</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T06:57:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4714971</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4714971" />
    <title>Comment from tz on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>tz</name>
        <uri>http://thomasz.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://thomasz.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>The FBI probably uses the same system to track terrorists.  Where is the NSA when Japanese auto executives are discussing warranty problems?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T06:02:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4714881</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4714881" />
    <title>Comment from lonewolf333 on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>lonewolf333</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>The only way to get your complaints listened to by the FCC is to say you saw a nipple.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T05:53:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4714808</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4714808" />
    <title>Comment from Bay State Darren on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bay State Darren</name>
        <uri>http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=727467130</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=727467130">
        <![CDATA[<p>At least they admit such complaints exist. I'm actually kinda impressed by that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T05:45:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4714604</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4714604" />
    <title>Comment from SacredByte on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>SacredByte</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Or about someone saying "cunt" on morning television.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T05:23:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4714508</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4714508" />
    <title>Comment from trujunglist on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>trujunglist</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm sure that a crapload of these complaints are invalid. Then again, I'm sure a crapload of the complaints are totally valid. Then again, I'm sure that a crapload of the totally valid complaints are completely ignored by the FCC because it conflicts with whatever is in their best interest (i.e. how much money will whatever company give to us now?). Government is total and absolute corruption. I really lost the perhaps tiny amount of faith I maybe had left at a recent meeting with some government douchebags. You would be absolutely amazed at the incompetence and general douchebaggery, or probably not actually, because we for some reason expect it yet do nothing.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T05:11:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4714450</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4714450" />
    <title>Comment from Orv on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Orv</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think they only track complaints when people are complaining about "wardrobe malfunctions."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T05:06:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4714326</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4714326" />
    <title>Comment from homerjay on 2008-03-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>homerjay</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Incompetency in the federal government?? Say it ain't so!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T04:56:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252-comment:4714305</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.368252" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/03/new-report-says-fcc-fails-at-tracking-customer-complaints.html#c4714305" />
    <title>Comment from SVreader on 2008-03-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>SVreader</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sounds suspect. On the other hand, I once talked to a guy who said he was reporting a popular search engine (not an internet service provider) to the FCC because his internet connection had been down.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T04:54:39Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



