<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-09T04:17:26Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for $2.7 Billion Bid So Far In Wireless Spectrum Auction</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=348837" title="$2.7 Billion Bid So Far In Wireless Spectrum Auction" />
    <published>2008-01-25T10:23:53Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-25T10:25:58Z</updated>
    <title>$2.7 Billion Bid So Far In Wireless Spectrum Auction</title>
    <summary>Bidding for the national franchise in the C block started at $1.037 billion in the morning and was raised to $1.245 billion in the afternoon. The reserve price for the national C block is $4.6 billion. (Google has said it will bid at least $4.6 billion for this block, but there is no requirement that it place a bid in that amount at first.)</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Meg Marco</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Google" />
    
    <category term="Verizon" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img alt="fccbay.jpg" src="http://consumerist.com/images/resources/2008/01/fccbay.jpg" width="199" height="69" class="left" />-->After the first day of wireless spectrum bidding, the FCC announced that $2.7 billion has been offered so far. The <em>NYT </em>explains:<br />
<blockquote>Bidding for the national franchise in the C block started at $1.037 billion in the morning and was raised to $1.245 billion in the afternoon. The reserve price for the national C block is $4.6 billion. (Google has said it will bid at least $4.6 billion for this block, but there is no requirement that it place a bid in that amount at first.)</p>

<p>There will be three rounds of bidding on Friday, but none over the weekend. Mr. Levin said that by mid-February it would become clear whether the bids for the national blocks will exceed their reserve prices. </blockquote> This is just like that one time when I bit on those cute vintage boots, but then at the last minute stupid Verizon Wireless came along with their $5 billion and... </p>

<p><a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/24/spectrum-auction-day-1-2779-billion-in-bids/">Spectrum Auction Day 1: $2.779 Billion in Bids </a>[NYT]<br />
<a href="http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=73">Auction 73 700 MHz Band</a> [FCC]</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3887710</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3887710" />
    <title>Comment from dgcaste on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>dgcaste</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm planning on shilling the auction for 500 billion.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T23:50:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3884624</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3884624" />
    <title>Comment from mac-phisto on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>mac-phisto</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c3882286" rel="nofollow">Rachacha</a>: i'm with you...but i'd rather we bought something in the 40 Hz range, built a large microwave emitter &amp; pointed it towards capitol hill.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T21:59:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3884140</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3884140" />
    <title>Comment from Morgan on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Morgan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/348837/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction#c3881678" rel="nofollow">timmus</a>: The topic is "What this spectrum of wireless transmition means to me."</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T21:40:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3883219</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3883219" />
    <title>Comment from varco on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>varco</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/348837/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction#c3882286" rel="nofollow">Rachacha</a>: We all own the spectrum. It's public property and the FCC is selling it for us to (a) distribute it to companies that will hopefully do something interesting with it and (b) make some bank, yo.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T21:04:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3883092</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3883092" />
    <title>Comment from Mr. Gunn on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mr. Gunn</name>
        <uri>http://synthesis.williamgunn.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://synthesis.williamgunn.org">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="#c3882286" rel="nofollow">Rachacha</a>: that's awesome.  HD public access, anyone?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T20:59:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3882286</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3882286" />
    <title>Comment from Rachacha on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rachacha</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Let's all pool our money that we will be receiving from the Economy stimulation plan and buy the spectrum ourselves...by my calculations we should be able to come up with $100 Billion give or take. Anyone with me?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T20:27:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3881831</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3881831" />
    <title>Comment from obbie on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>obbie</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>do they accept paypal?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T20:04:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3881678</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3881678" />
    <title>Comment from timmus on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>timmus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Something like this should not go simply to whoever has the most money.  They should have an essay contest.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T19:56:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3881555</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3881555" />
    <title>Comment from mantari on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>mantari</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>What is the BuyItNow price for the spectrum?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T19:49:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3881281</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3881281" />
    <title>Comment from savvy999 on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>savvy999</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p></p><blockquote>The bidding rules are so complex that it makes Texas Hold'em look like Go Fish. To stay in the auction, companies need to bid a minimum amount each round. But they can move their bids around, meaning that often companies "park" their bids in auctions they are not really interested in to see how the bidding emerges for the auctions they do care about. What is more, bidders get three waivers - rounds in which they do not need to bid anything. And they strategically drop out for a round to try to assess their competition.</blockquote>
<p>Does that not sound like an awesome game to play?</p>
<p>After it's all over I hope they show the bid history  like eBay does.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T19:33:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3881066</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3881066" />
    <title>Comment from JustAGuy2 on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>JustAGuy2</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/348837/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction#c3880943" rel="nofollow">K-Bo</a>:</p><br />
<p>Fair enough, but that's a separate issue.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T19:19:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3880943</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3880943" />
    <title>Comment from K-Bo on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>K-Bo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c3880737" rel="nofollow">JustAGuy2</a>: In theory the money benefits us, in practice they will probably find some pork to spend it on.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T19:12:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3880737</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3880737" />
    <title>Comment from JustAGuy2 on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>JustAGuy2</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/348837/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction#c3880356" rel="nofollow">scoosdad</a>:</p><br />
<p>You also get to either (a) pay lower taxes or (b) have a smaller share of the national debt.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T18:48:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3880356</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3880356" />
    <title>Comment from scoosdad on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>scoosdad</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c3880044" rel="nofollow">glass</a>: You don't get a check, you get a chance to receive two of those $40 coupon from the government to buy converter boxes so you can keep watching TV.  /sarcasm</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T17:32:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3880347</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3880347" />
    <title>Comment from JustAGuy2 on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>JustAGuy2</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c3880117" rel="nofollow">supersally</a>:</p>
<p>That's pretty much it.  If they require the first bid to be $4.6BN, and it doesn't attract a bid, all they know is "4.6BN is too much."  If they let people bid below $4.6BN, they know "$4.6BN is too much, BUT people were willing to pay $4.1BN."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T17:31:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3880117</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3880117" />
    <title>Comment from SuperSally on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>SuperSally</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I always thought letting the bidding start below the reserve was for two things:</p>
<p>1)to build up buying momentum and competitiveness, so once it hops past the reserve the buyers will keep on rolling strong</p>
<p>2)Because if it doesn't meet the reserve, the seller could suck it up and sell it anyway?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T16:17:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3880044</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3880044" />
    <title>Comment from glass on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>glass</name>
        <uri>http://seaofdeadfaces.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://seaofdeadfaces.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c3879679" rel="nofollow">varco</a>: <i>"The spectrum belongs to the people and the funds from the auction go to the people."</i></p>
<p>Cool! When do I get my check?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T15:48:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3879978</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3879978" />
    <title>Comment from coren on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>coren</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c3878888" rel="nofollow">Hyland</a>: If that's the case, then why is the reserve disclosed, to the point where Google says they will bid it?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T15:17:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3879758</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3879758" />
    <title>Comment from varco on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>varco</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Re: that last comment,</p><br />
<p>I would argue that the FCC's biggest effort to stifle competition lies in efforts to lower barriers for the consolidation of media ownership, despite a great and righteous public outcry against it.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T13:21:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3879679</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3879679" />
    <title>Comment from varco on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>varco</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/348837/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction#c3879475" rel="nofollow">yg17</a>: It costs the FCC nothing, but the winner of the auction may make enormous profit on their investment. The spectrum belongs to the people and the funds from the auction go to the people.</p><br />
<p>The auction and licensing is there so that the spectrum is regulated. If it wasn't regulated, everyone would broadcast on whatever spectrum they wanted, there would be all sorts of interference, and nothing would work. If a small cell phone start-up (and that is sort of an oxymoron) wanted to buy into the spectrum, they could always try purchase a license from whoever wins the auction.</p><br />
<p>The FCC definitely stifles competition, but this auction isn't really related to that.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T13:02:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3879634</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3879634" />
    <title>Comment from Sherryness on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sherryness</name>
        <uri>http://www.highfructosehigh.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.highfructosehigh.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Yes, yes - something is only worth what someone will pay for it.</p><br />
<p>And I still have to say, "What the...."???????</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T12:53:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3879483</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3879483" />
    <title>Comment from yg17 on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>yg17</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c3879458" rel="nofollow">varco</a>: I know, please read my previous comment. And yes, the 700MHz band is what makes up a portion of the analog TV spectrum.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T12:26:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3879475</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3879475" />
    <title>Comment from yg17 on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>yg17</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c3879438" rel="nofollow">RottNDude</a>: I know exactly what it's actually for, but 4.6 billion still seems absurd. I doubt it costs the FCC anything near that, and all it does is prevent competition. Who knows, a startup cellular company who would actually give two shits about their customers and product might want to buy that, but just can't afford the initial investment, so the same old big corporate assholes get it. But if there's one thing the FCC's good at, it's stifling competition.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T12:25:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3879458</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3879458" />
    <title>Comment from varco on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>varco</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/348837/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction#c3879393" rel="nofollow">yg17</a>: Probably because it's nothing like "auctioning off air".</p><br />
<p>Anyone know if this spectrum is available as a result of switching from analog to digital over-the-air broadcast TV?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T12:23:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3879438</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3879438" />
    <title>Comment from RottNDude on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>RottNDude</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's not air, it's the right to broadcast using a certain frequency so as not to interfere with other communications.  Someone has to manage this shit, and ensure that everyone (and every piece of equipment) is compliant.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T12:19:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3879393</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3879393" />
    <title>Comment from yg17 on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>yg17</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Something just seems so wrong about auctioning off air for 4.6 billion dollars.....</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T12:14:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3879292</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3879292" />
    <title>Comment from RumorsDaily on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>RumorsDaily</name>
        <uri>http://www.rumorsdaily.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rumorsdaily.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Ok, I bid $3 billion.</p>
<p>If there's no way I can win at that price, and EVERYBODY knows what the reserve price is, what's the point of it?  A silent reserve I understand.  If you aren't ultimately willing to bid at least $4.6, you shouldn't be in the game.</p>
<p>Alright, alright... I bid $3.5 billion.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T11:58:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3879280</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3879280" />
    <title>Comment from Sherryness on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sherryness</name>
        <uri>http://www.highfructosehigh.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.highfructosehigh.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>What the??????</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T11:57:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3878988</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3878988" />
    <title>Comment from bobf23 on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>bobf23</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Is this auction for the SDTV channels. I had heard that the government was going to sell these channels to try to make up the deficit but that is bs because they will waste more on get every one subsidies to buy converter boxes for HD.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T11:14:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3878888</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3878888" />
    <title>Comment from Adam Hyland on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Adam Hyland</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c3878851" rel="nofollow">alhypo</a>: you limit participation with a known reserve price.  the fcc will attract more companies by making a lower minimum bid and leaving an undisclosed reserve price.  Besides, there is no reason that reserve price needs to be preset.  It could just be  a safety mechanism to make sure companies aren't cheesing the auction like in the Swiss or German cellular spectrum auctions.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T11:00:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3878851</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3878851" />
    <title>Comment from alhypo on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>alhypo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Why is it that they bother with the reserve anyway? Why not just start the bidding at 4.6B?</p>
<p>Especially since eBay charges a percentage fee of the reserve price.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T10:55:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837-comment:3878783</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2008://1.348837" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2008/01/27-billion-bid-so-far-in-wireless-spectrum-auction.html#c3878783" />
    <title>Comment from Grrrrrrr, portrait of a chickenwolfmoosepig. on 2008-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Grrrrrrr, portrait of a chickenwolfmoosepig.</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>But hey, if you bid over $1 billion, the FCC gives you free shipping.  Such a deal!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-25T10:47:50Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



