![\"user-pic\"](\"http://consumerist.com/assets_c/userpics/userpic-59017-100x100.png\")
I got a 404 on this??
I got a 404 on this??
![\"user-pic\"](\"/css/images/default.gif\")
Seems that whole website is messed up. can't even get to the homepage.
The link doesn't work anymore :(
![\"user-pic\"](\"http://consumerist.com/assets_c/userpics/userpic-142246-100x100.png\")
tom ford hates women.
![\"user-pic\"](\"/mt-static/support/assets_c/userpics/userpic-21970-100x100.png\")
It was working about 30 minutes ago... I'll keep checking and remove or update the link as needed. Sorry about that!
Meh, I was expecting more social commentary aside from \"OMG, SEX!!!\" I know there've been ads out there with not-so-subtle racist/classist/mysoginist/(insert your favourite -ist) undertones, yet the best they could find was wulva and a facial?
there are so many ads missing from there. calvin klein kiddie porn anyone? tom ford's full frontal male nudity? gucci's \"g\" pubic hair? where are all of those?
![\"user-pic\"](\"http://consumerist.com/assets_c/userpics/userpic-136125-100x100.png\")
.
![\"user-pic\"](\"http://consumerist.com/assets_c/userpics/userpic-101482-100x100.png\")
el page 404'd
![\"user-pic\"](\"http://consumerist.com/assets_c/userpics/userpic-185231-100x100.png\")
The Akademiks ad could at least have gotten the Spanish right. Tsk tsk.
awesome Consumerist readers overloaded their website
LOL
I don't know, this may sound fruity (no pun intended), but I like smelling like some stuff that what some may consider \"girly,\" like my Irish Spring, Sometimes I can't find the regular green or blue one, so I use the aloe smelling one, or sometimes some other sweet smelling soap, girls don't seem to mind, in fact they say they prefer it over Axe or whatever weird shit cologne smells like today, at least thats what my friends tell me
I'm currently wearing Tom Ford For Men. It's one of my favorites, though it's pretty safe to say the ad campaign played no part in my decision.
![\"user-pic\"](\"http://consumerist.com/assets_c/userpics/userpic-153851-100x100.png\")
I got, \"Bad Request (Invalid Hostname)\"
![\"user-pic\"](\"/mt-static/support/assets_c/userpics/userpic-125319-100x100.png\")
I think the message of the Tom Ford campaign is not 'Smell More Like Vaginas with Tom Ford', it's 'The Way to a Woman's Vagina is Through Tom Ford'.
![\"user-pic\"](\"http://consumerist.com/assets_c/userpics/userpic-110833-100x100.png\")
What? There's no woman between man's legs shoe ad? Can't anyone see that reference? Aargh, I guess this only counts if the ad's in fashion magazines.
@Electroqueen: BTW the ad I'm referring to was in the New York Times Sunday Newspaper a few years back.
No mention of Benetton's David Kirby on his deathbed looking like Jesus ad? The one so bad that many magazines ran two facing blank white pages instead of printing it? Whatever. I'd never even heard or seen any of the ones they list, and they collectively just listed American Apparel as a cop-out.
![\"user-pic\"](\"/mt-static/support/assets_c/userpics/userpic-263390-100x100.png\")
Ugh. I think I'll see that Sisley ad every time I close my eyes for the next week. Gotta dig out that box of toothpicks I keep for just such occasions.
As for the Tom Ford ad... hope that cap is on tight, or that baby's gonna sting something chronic.
I think the woman is humping the bottle of Tom Ford cologne because she's so turned on by it. At least I think that's the reasoning.
And the D&G ad? I'm not really seeing any violence there. More like bored bisexuals trying out S&M and the woman's thinking \"Dammit, I should have gotten a pillow for my shoulder blades\". Dude on the right is checking out Dom Guy's delts, and the guy to the far left is looking longingly at the woman but is too chicken to admit to Dom Guy that he wants to do the whole het monogomy thing. The guy with the jacket is rethinking his whole jacket idea, considering just how hot it is outside.
I'm not sure what Dom Guy's thinking. I have a feeling he's supposed to represent Karl Lagerfeld, though.
why must the dolce and gabana ad be considered gang rape and not just a good, ol' fashioned consensual gang bang?
![\"user-pic\"](\"http://consumerist.com/assets_c/userpics/userpic-1490-100x100.png\")
@Shred:
My sentiments exactly. If it is a rape, that's the most bored terrified woman I've ever seen. Oh and rape victims don't usually arch their hips towards their attackers pelvis. Definitely a gang bang.
Idiots and prudes. The people who made this list must be idiots and prudes, or at least the people offended by them are. Sex sells, how much more over does one get than taking the product you want to sell and placing directly in front of a woman's sexual organs(or at least the access to said organs)? Beautiful bodies and beautiful people sell, at least they sell most of the brands who made the ads in this list, the people that buy akademics I try not to notice. In any case, the more of these beautiful bodies you can show and associate with your product the better right?
The \"gang rape\" ad? How bout the \"group sex\" ad? While it may be the same to some people, it certainly wasn't to a ton of the people I partied with in college. The milk thing? That brings in both sexual bits, since she's hot you know, and mother bits, since it's milk.
So many of these things just address fetishes or sex directly. The sooner our culture gets off this \"sex is bad\" puritanical kick the better.
le sigh
I'm disappointed that all these ads are overtly heterosexual, when two of them (Tom Ford and D+G) came in gay equivalents.
Tom Ford cologne smells like Chicken of the Sea?
![\"user-pic\"](\"http://consumerist.com/assets_c/userpics/userpic-32254-100x100.png\")
![\"user-pic\"](\"http://consumerist.com/assets_c/userpics/userpic-1713-100x100.png\")
I like that they translate the tag line so you can be sexist in any language!