<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-09T04:50:06Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Which Retirement Funds To Tap First</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=324002" title="Which Retirement Funds To Tap First" />
    <published>2007-11-20T02:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-01T10:20:00Z</updated>
    <title>Which Retirement Funds To Tap First</title>
    <summary>--&gt;So you&apos;re an old geezer and you&apos;re ready to start enjoying all the money you saved up for retirement. If you&apos;re under 70.5, this is the order you should spend your assets in, according to the Autumn 2007 Vanguard report:</summary>
    <author>
      <name>consumerist.com</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term=" Be Frugal" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img alt="hulahoopinoldies.jpg" src="http://consumerist.com/images/resources/2007/11/hulahoopinoldies.jpg" width="178" class="left" height="157" />-->So you're an old geezer and you're ready to start enjoying all the money you saved up for retirement. If you're under 70.5, this is the order you should spend your assets in, according to the Autumn 2007 Vanguard report:</p>

<p>1. Taxable<br />
2. Tax-deferred (from traditional IRAs or 401(k) and other employer plans)<br />
3. Tax-free (from Roth IRAs or Roth employer plans)</p>

<p>The idea is that you want your tax-free income to have the chance to grow and compound as much interest as possible before tapping it. After you're 70.5, the IRS requires you to withdraw a certain amount from your employer plans and traditional IRAs. You'll want to spend those withdrawals down first before tapping into your taxable accounts.</p>

<p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/saramarie/1566232610/">saramarie</a>)</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002-comment:3045621</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html#c3045621" />
    <title>Comment from rhombopteryx on 2007-11-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>rhombopteryx</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Ben, gotta link to the report so we can read it!</p><br />
<p>All this discussion about what order to withdraw from accounts leaves a BIG issue unaddressed - when and if to take Social Security benefits. That can have a huge impact on taxation and timing. UPenn. has an independent think tank that writes on <a href="http://www.pensionresearchcouncil.org/publications/document.php?file=389" rel="nofollow">just these topics</a>.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-21T03:10:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002-comment:3031003</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html#c3031003" />
    <title>Comment from ColoradoShark on 2007-11-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>ColoradoShark</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c3030362" rel="nofollow">Jeff_McAwesome</a>: That gives you 50.5 years to save.  Don't miss out on the awesomeness of compound interest over that amount of time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-20T03:51:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002-comment:3030362</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html#c3030362" />
    <title>Comment from Jeff_McAwesome on 2007-11-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff_McAwesome</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I'll keep this in mind. It'll come in useful in 50.5 years.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-20T03:12:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002-comment:3030117</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html#c3030117" />
    <title>Comment from BigNutty on 2007-11-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>BigNutty</name>
        <uri>http://ConsumerFight.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ConsumerFight.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Vanguard's advice seems solid but I fell like I'm in the twilight zone. I would still tap the money in my mattress first.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-20T02:57:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002-comment:3029532</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html#c3029532" />
    <title>Comment from kimdog on 2007-11-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>kimdog</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>deja vu all over again.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-20T02:29:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002-comment:3029360</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html#c3029360" />
    <title>Comment from sleze69 on 2007-11-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>sleze69</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Wasn't this posted a couple days ago?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-20T02:21:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002-comment:3016464</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html#c3016464" />
    <title>Comment from jmorgans on 2007-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>jmorgans</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I'm not even close to retirement, but it seems to me that the best way to tap a combination of Roth and traditional retirement accounts is to use both in any given year, minimizing taxes. For example, if I need $60K to live on and the tax bracket cutoff is at $40K, I would take $40K from a traditional IRA and $20K from the Roth.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-18T10:10:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002-comment:3015593</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.324002" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/which-retirement-funds-to-tap-first.html#c3015593" />
    <title>Comment from gibbersome on 2007-11-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>gibbersome</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Makes alot of sense. BTW, Vanguard Retirement plans are the best I've seen thus far.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-18T06:03:20Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



