<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-09T04:58:10Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Circuit City Refusing To Honor Advertised Offer For Free Call Of Duty 3?</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=319551" title="Circuit City Refusing To Honor Advertised Offer For Free Call Of Duty 3?" />
    <published>2007-11-06T23:57:55Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-01T10:30:17Z</updated>
    <title>Circuit City Refusing To Honor Advertised Offer For Free Call Of Duty 3?</title>
    <summary>Adam We looked up the weekly circular for Naperville, IL and sure enough. There it is. No mention of a misprint. We think Circuit City should honor this offer. There&apos;s really no reason to believe it was a misprint.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Meg Marco</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term=" E-commerce" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img alt="callofduty.jpg" src="http://consumerist.com/images/resources/2007/11/callofduty.jpg" width="463" height="203" />-->Reader Adam says:<br />
<blockquote><br />
Today, like many anxious gamers, I went to Circuit City (Store # 3111) to pick up the highly anticipated "Call of Duty 4" for the XBox 360.  I chose to pick it up at Circuit City as this week's circular ad listed a free copy of the previous game "Call of Duty 3" with purchase.  When I went to check out, I was told that it was a misprint and that they refused to honor it.  Myself, along with about half a dozen co-workers were rightfully angry that we wasted our lunch hour on this Circuit City bait-and-switch, that has become too common with this outlet lately.  I would urge other Consumerists to skip out on Circuit City and try for another retailer (Target has a free $5 gift card). <br />
 <br />
Adam</blockquote> We looked up the weekly circular for Naperville, IL and sure enough. There it is. No mention of a misprint. We think Circuit City should honor this offer. There's really no reason to believe it was a misprint.</p>

<p>Are other people having this problem?</p>

<p><a href="http://circuitcity.shoplocal.com/circuitcity/Default.aspx?action=browsepagelarge&storeid=2397075&rapid=471479&pagenumber=12">Circuit City Weekly Ad, Page 12 </a>[Circuit City]<br />
</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:4286729</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c4286729" />
    <title>Comment from jerestarsj on 2008-02-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>jerestarsj</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Well first of all, at our store did honor this promotion at our store. However, look at the fine print, it says you can get COD3 WHILE SUPPLIES LAST. So this isn't bait and switch. Putting on your ad describing that your location will have limited quantities of a certain items isn't bait and switch. This also isn't false advertisement because they actually did honor the offer.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-02-20T00:05:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2966889</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2966889" />
    <title>Comment from stormbo on 2007-11-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>stormbo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/bait-and-switch/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3-319551.php#c2883922" rel="nofollow">Asvetic</a>:</p><br />
<p>I know this is a old topic but just to let all of you know I am a manager at the Naperville store (3121) and we honored this offer with no prob. In fact this was not an add misprint at all, they just did not update our system with this offer so we were told to manually price adjust the items. I would guess that the person you talked to at 3111 was just a new associate.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-14T05:42:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2919928</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2919928" />
    <title>Comment from Trick on 2007-11-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trick</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2892238" rel="nofollow">formergr</a>:</p>
<p><b>Uhhh...if you refuse to buy anything from them, how can you say you didn't have a problem getting the COD 3 promo for free??</b></p>
<p>--</p>
<p>I didn't get anything for free.  Where did I say I did?  I won't buy *anything* from Circuit City.  I prefer to buy from companies who don't wake up first thing in the morning and figure out how they will screw their customers that day...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-09T09:19:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2913714</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2913714" />
    <title>Comment from ttizzles10 on 2007-11-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>ttizzles10</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>So i was one of the lucky Circuit City shoppers at store # 3175 and I went to pick up my copy of Call of Duty 3 &amp; 4, however when i got there they were all out of the 3rd one. So they were discounting the price of Call of Duty 3 right off the top of the price of Call of Duty 4!!! I was lucky enough to get there before they changed there prices and I picked up my copy for $29.99. I did try going back and they said, well it is what it is now. Things changed, take it up with Corporate. Corporate said sorry, but its out of our hands.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-09T01:04:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2912926</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2912926" />
    <title>Comment from Phantom_Photon on 2007-11-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phantom_Photon</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I would hope the local attorney general would investigate this. This is obviously not a misprint, as it is inconceivable how the printer could have accidentally misprinted the article in this way.</p>
<p>A "misprint" means that the printer is at fault because of a typographical error (such as offering something for 4.99 when it was supposed to be offered for 54.99). This may be a mistake of Circuit City's marketing department, but they must honor the ad as it was printed.</p>
<p>This is at the least Circuit City illegally not honoring it's own ad, and at the worst Circuit City blatently pulling a "bait and switch" scam.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-09T00:31:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2903992</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2903992" />
    <title>Comment from jaewon223 on 2007-11-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>jaewon223</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I used to work at Circuit City and although during my employment there I haven't had any experiences like this sort of "misprint" I can testify to the underhanded way departmental managers go about in increasing sales.  They were underperforming compared to BestBuy and other electronic retailers so all regional managers had store managers push as much product out the door as possible.  Sometimes it led to morally gray area.</p>
<p>Buy online people!  and not these retailer's websites, online STORES I mean</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-08T06:21:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2900160</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2900160" />
    <title>Comment from BugMeNot2 on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>BugMeNot2</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@  MSUHITMAN <br />
I'm so glad someone finally said something about the bug in the system!!  My b/f went last night to get his CoD 3&amp;4, and together, they rang up at about $30+ sales tax.   You people have to stop whining over this one incident when soooo many people have gotten their copy...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-08T02:00:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2899354</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2899354" />
    <title>Comment from magus_melchior on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>magus_melchior</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>"Boss, they're lining up at the door."<br />
"*&amp;@^%! Okay, tell them it's a misprint."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-08T01:20:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2899005</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2899005" />
    <title>Comment from ChristopherDavis on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>ChristopherDavis</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="#c2890272" rel="nofollow">JayDeEm</a>: That doesn't always work out. You might get <a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/fraud/best-buy-sells-you-a-box-of-bathroom-tiles-instead-of-hard-drive-wont-refund-315873.php" rel="nofollow">a box full of bathroom tile</a>.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-08T01:03:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2898232</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2898232" />
    <title>Comment from Eleo on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Eleo</name>
        <uri>http://eleochan.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://eleochan.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes that happened to me, and I remember being ecstatic that I got a well-reviewed, newly released game, and an excellent-but-older game for $30 total, which is roughly a $60 discount.</p>
<p>This guy is reporting what is so far an isolated incident, so I see no reason to get angry at all of Circuit City about it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-08T00:29:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2894737</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2894737" />
    <title>Comment from MSUHitman on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>MSUHitman</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>The reason this probably happened is there was a bug in Circuit City's computers that when the regular or gold editions of Call of Duty 3 (not the Platinum Hits edition) were added to Call of Duty 4 on the register ticket, it not only discounted CoD 3 to free (as it's normally $30) but it was discounting CoD 4 $30 as well. So you were getting a brand new, top-tier game, as well as its previous version, for a grand total of $30. Here's the original thread on CAG:</p><br />
<p><a href="http://www.cheapassgamer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158506" rel="nofollow">[www.cheapassgamer.com]</a></p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T21:36:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2893951</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2893951" />
    <title>Comment from uricmu on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>uricmu</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2891544" rel="nofollow">formated4tv</a>: Don't you mean you adjusted 25 and gave them COD4 for 35$ ?</p>
<p>I thought COD3 retailed for 25</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T20:49:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2893479</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2893479" />
    <title>Comment from cobra2977 on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>cobra2977</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Just for your information.. All the Columbus, Ohio stores never had Call of duty 3 in stock for November 06, 2007.  We never had a chance to buy it, even though the ad said it would be available at 2pm.  They did offer to let me buy Call of Duty IV, then get Call of Duty 3 for free if they got it back in stock by Saturday, November 10.  What nice people not.... FALSE ADVERTISING.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T20:12:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2892238</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2892238" />
    <title>Comment from formergr on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>formergr</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2891088" rel="nofollow">Trick</a>: "I didn't have a problem.</p>
<p>I refuse to shop at Circuit City.</p>
<p>Period.</p>
<p>I won't take anything from them for free."</p>
<p>Uhhh...if you refuse to buy anything from them, how can you say you didn't have a problem getting the COD 3 promo for free??</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T16:52:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2891658</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2891658" />
    <title>Comment from Protector on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Protector</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2887967" rel="nofollow">freakinalex</a>: Get back to work, and make sure you sell those PSPs!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T12:30:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2891614</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2891614" />
    <title>Comment from badhatharry on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>badhatharry</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I purchased COD 4 today, and the salesperson threw COD 3 on top of it, and I said, "No, I just want #4."  The guy told me that it comes free with it, so I got it.  I didn't even know that was the deal.  Here's the thing, though, COD 3 sucks.  I played it for a couple of hours, and you can't skip the cut scenes, and the layouts of the levels are stupid.  Getting it for free is not much of a treat.  But, if they do promise it, they should provide.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T12:18:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2891544</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2891544" />
    <title>Comment from formated4tv on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>formated4tv</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm a manager at Circuit City (until tomorrow, haha), but a lot of people brought this up today as part of the sale, and I just price adjusted CoD4 to take off the price of CoD3. Basically, if anyone wanted, they could return CoD3 and get CoD4 for like 25$.</p>
<p>It's the little things in life that make me happy =)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T12:00:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2891088</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2891088" />
    <title>Comment from Trick on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trick</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I didn't have a problem.</p>
<p>I refuse to shop at Circuit City.</p>
<p>Period.</p>
<p>I won't take anything from them for free.</p>
<p>They are as bad as Best Buy.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T10:18:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2890624</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2890624" />
    <title>Comment from eelmonger on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>eelmonger</name>
        <uri>http://www.picbreeder.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.picbreeder.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>CC runs promotions like this all the time.  When I bought Silent Hill 2, i got Silent Hill 1 for free.  When I bought Devil May Cry 2, I got Devil May Cry 1 for free.  I'm assuming something happened to their COD3 stock and they were just trying to weasel out of things.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T08:54:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2890591</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2890591" />
    <title>Comment from RipTheJacker on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>RipTheJacker</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>You know what's funny? I work at Circuit City, and we honored this at my store. I wasn't around too much, but I sold two copies of the game. Each one had Call of Duty 3 for free included. Sounds like store #3111 has managers who are either cheap, or have no idea what they're doing. =/</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T08:47:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2890469</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2890469" />
    <title>Comment from HalOfBorg on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>HalOfBorg</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>It's 10:26PM EST and on CC's website, when you look up COD4, it lists right there:</p><br />
<p>Special offers</p><br />
<p>• Free: Call of Duty 3 with purchase</p><br />
<p>It ALSO lists COD4 like THIS:</p><br />
<p>Out of stock online<br />Notify me when available<br />Not available for in-store pickup</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T08:28:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2890378</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2890378" />
    <title>Comment from uricmu on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>uricmu</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2890272" rel="nofollow">JayDeEm</a>: They didn't have it available for delivery or in-store pickup. I think they don't update  the site in mid day of release.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T08:12:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2890272</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2890272" />
    <title>Comment from JayDeEm on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>JayDeEm</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>In the rare case I do ever buy something from the CC/BB's of the world, I always buy on the site for in-store pickup. This way you're walking in with a receipt and they can't try to scam/upsell/extend your warranty. I never make any large purchases at these places, but once in a while they'll have a decent 'online only' deal for a smaller item.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T07:56:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2889590</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2889590" />
    <title>Comment from EtherealStrife on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>EtherealStrife</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I bet the employees are pocketing the promos</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T06:19:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2889258</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2889258" />
    <title>Comment from leshrac55 on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>leshrac55</name>
        <uri>http://www.alinktothefuture.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.alinktothefuture.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's not available online any more, but it's still listed there for all to see.  It's most certainly not a misprint or price mistake or offer mistake of any kind:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.circuitcity.com/rpsm/oid/190733/bundleId/15255/rpem/ccd/bundleDetail.do" rel="nofollow">[www.circuitcity.com]</a></p>
<p>-Jeff<br />
<a href="http://alinktothefuture.com" rel="nofollow">[alinktothefuture.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T05:44:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2889247</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2889247" />
    <title>Comment from joellevand on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>joellevand</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>That's funny, I went to a CC in NJ today and had no problem getting COD3 for free with my COD4 purchase. Big posters in the store promoting it and everything.</p>
<p>Sounds like one franchise owner just didn't want to honor corporate's promo.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T05:43:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2889089</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2889089" />
    <title>Comment from RandomHookup on 2007-11-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>RandomHookup</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I find letting the Attorney General's office know about these instances of false advertising works wonders. Corporate is more than happy to straighten out the offending manager.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T05:25:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2888612</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2888612" />
    <title>Comment from R3PUBLIC0N on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>R3PUBLIC0N</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Go Go Gadget Fraud!<br />
Or false pretense, if you'd care to be old school.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T04:40:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2888183</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2888183" />
    <title>Comment from uricmu on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>uricmu</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I went to a CC 15 minutes away in Northern Pittsburgh. It's a funny one because there's rarely anyone working there. I was told to go to customer service. They told me that they got a wrong shipment (COD2 instead of COD3), and that I could get a gift card for COD3 (so you could use that for another game...), or ring COD4 for 30$+tax. I went with the 30$+tax.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T04:04:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2887967</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2887967" />
    <title>Comment from freakinalex on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>freakinalex</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I much prefer Best Buy over Circuit City.</p><br />
<p>That's right, I said it.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T03:48:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2887915</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2887915" />
    <title>Comment from swissdietcoke on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>swissdietcoke</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>this is NOT an ad correction!! This is NOT bait and switch. CIRCUIT CITY will honor this ad, with no questions. I don't know what happened at that single store.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T03:46:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2887881</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2887881" />
    <title>Comment from brendanm14 on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>brendanm14</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2886239" rel="nofollow">GearheadGeek</a>: they were all out and the nearest Fry's is 20+ miles away but yet I still get their circular in the paper.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T03:42:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2887724</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2887724" />
    <title>Comment from Krossbones on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Krossbones</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This must have been an isolated incident. The offer started this morning and I've already given out a few copies of CoD3</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T03:33:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2887662</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2887662" />
    <title>Comment from Gannoc on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Gannoc</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I get pissed when people try to insist that a store should honor a CLEARLY incorrect price.  (Like a $500 item listed as $5.00, etc).  There is a difference between bait and switch and expecting a company to give up tens of thousands of dollars because people take advantage of a loophole.</p>
<p>BUT: Now, it looks like Circuit City is taking advantage of people like me who give them the benefit of the doubt by lying about a misprint.</p>
<p>Ok, if it is a misprint, what did it mean to say?  That is, if someone typed something in wrong, what was the correct text?</p>
<p>Clearly BS on their part.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T03:29:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2887596</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2887596" />
    <title>Comment from drinktillsheshot on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>drinktillsheshot</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I experienced a similar CC Bait &amp; Switch situation a few months ago.  They advertised "Save $20 with the purchase of any 2 Xbox Live accessories $19.99 &amp; Up," so I went to the local store to pick up a couple of XBL 1600point cards for $20 each ($20 total after the advertised deal).  The mgr said the deal is good ONLY if you buy an XBOX360 Elite system.  It did not say this anywhere in the circular, and needless to say myself and several other customers left the store quite angry.  I called corporate to complain but did not hear anything back from them.</p>
<p>CC won't see another dollar from me and I will badmouth them to anyone who will listen.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T03:25:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2887481</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2887481" />
    <title>Comment from monkeypox on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>monkeypox</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've grown to expect shady things like this from circuit city, which is why I went there on sunday and hid 3 copies of call of duty 3 (they had at least 12 copies total) in 3 different places, just in case.</p>
<p>I can't prove they're lying about their stock, but it's the only way to ensure I actually get the game I want, especially with all the ebay hoarders out there.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T03:17:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2887197</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2887197" />
    <title>Comment from BigNutty on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>BigNutty</name>
        <uri>http://ConsumerFight.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ConsumerFight.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Regardless what Circuit City may state, consumers should put the pressure on Circuit City stores nationwide with boycotts and reporting this to your local media to try and get as much bad publicity for Circuit City as you can.</p><br />
<p>Fight fire with fire. This is just another example of a big company that thinks they are above the law and can do whatever they want.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T02:57:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2887187</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2887187" />
    <title>Comment from tempname on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>tempname</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yep when you go to their site it says right there. Search for Call of Duty 4, and it is on the products page under Special Offer. Misprint my butt.<br />
"•   Free: Call of Duty 3 with purchase"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T02:57:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2886997</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2886997" />
    <title>Comment from thalia on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>thalia</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This happens at our local Hastings all the time. They send out coupons once a month and there will always be at least one really awesome one and when you get to the store and go to check out, there's a teeny tiny sign saying, "Oh, there was a misprint in our company's coupon flyer this month, it should say 'Buy 6 books and get one free (retail $6.99 or less)', not 'Buy 1 get 1 free ($12.99 or less)'!"</p>
<p>The first time I wasn't upset, but once a month? Definitely bait-and-switch. If you bitch about it, they just say, "Oh, well, you know...Corporate." :shakes head: Which is why I do all my shopping with Amazon.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T02:46:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2886894</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2886894" />
    <title>Comment from xamarshahx on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>xamarshahx</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>bb does not price match freebies</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T02:41:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2886778</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2886778" />
    <title>Comment from robotprom on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>robotprom</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2886239" rel="nofollow">GearheadGeek</a>:</p>
<p>Price match plus BB will beat the price by 10%, I suspect.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T02:35:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2886694</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2886694" />
    <title>Comment from xtc46 - thinksmarter on twitter on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>xtc46 - thinksmarter on twitter</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2884857" rel="nofollow">tomok97</a>: they don't count it against them. Although the "raw" numbers will show it as a loss, it will be counted as an expected loss and not held against them. If the company is really nice, they wont hold it against the sales people either, when I worked on commission we had "margin protection" during events like this, so any instant savings would be credited back to our numbers when calculated otherwise it looks like we are making no money for the company. The company makes money on this because typically they are getting a kick back from the maker of the game</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T02:30:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2886404</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2886404" />
    <title>Comment from Critcol on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Critcol</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2886234" rel="nofollow">savvy999</a>: COD3 takes place in World War II like COD1 and COD2 do. COD4 takes place in the modern time.</p>
<p>And none of the game shared any story line except for the era that the game was taking place in.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T02:16:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2886239</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2886239" />
    <title>Comment from GearheadGeek on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>GearheadGeek</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2885699" rel="nofollow">brendanm14</a>: Why didn't you just buy the printer at Fry's?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T02:06:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2886234</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2886234" />
    <title>Comment from savvy999 on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>savvy999</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't play video games... so can someone edumacate me... why would you want COD3 if you're already buying COD4? Wouldn't you already have played COD3 out?</p>
<p>Or are you going from COD2-&gt;COD4 and taking advantage of getting COD3 for free and planning to take a week off from school/work to conquer two versions in a row?</p>
<p>signed,<br />
CompletelyIgnorantAboutSuchThings</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T02:05:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2886092</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2886092" />
    <title>Comment from Nytmare on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nytmare</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>You'd think a promo like this would be offered by the producer rather than a retail chain. Where are they getting all these extra copies of CoD 3, which hasn't nearly reached bargain-basement pricing yet?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T01:58:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2886025</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2886025" />
    <title>Comment from jstews_mole on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>jstews_mole</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I was able to get my copy of COD3 for free..but it took me 20 minutes of waiting around to get 1 of the 2 available copies...I have no idea what they were going to do for the other 5 people that were waiting behind me.  2 copies of something they are supposed to be giving away for free...and the ad DOES not state that it was "while supplies lasted", that was only for the poster.  Poor choice of a promo if you ask me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T01:54:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2885828</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2885828" />
    <title>Comment from Craig on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Craig</name>
        <uri>http://www.whatsonpodcast.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.whatsonpodcast.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>CC stands for Crappy Corporation.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T01:44:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2885762</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2885762" />
    <title>Comment from rikkus256 on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>rikkus256</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Those of you who couldn't get the advertised deal from Circuit City, file complaint to Federal Trade Commission here: <a href="https://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01" rel="nofollow">[rn.ftc.gov]</a></p>
<p>With enough complaints, the government will step in (like they did to CompUSA) and give dishonest merchants some lessons.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T01:41:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2885699</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2885699" />
    <title>Comment from brendanm14 on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>brendanm14</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Circuit City must be losing it.  I went in this weekend for a new HP printer that Fry's had in their ad for $169.  Circuit City's price = $269.  The refused to match Fry's price because as the sales guy pointed out "they are an outlet that carries only discontinued / open box stuff."  I did not have time to fight with him b/c my 2 year old was getting cranky.</p>
<p>So, I went to Best Buy with my Frys ad, they matched it no questions asked and I was in and out in 10 minutes.  I used to shop CC, but now BB will be earning my $$$ if I ever need to get anything there.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T01:38:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2885683</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2885683" />
    <title>Comment from galupo on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>galupo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I got my copy of COD4 and 3 after mentioning to a manger how I spoke to executive services for avaialbility and asked him if I could get his name and the store number. After I bought my two copies for me and my friend the employees bought the rest.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T01:37:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2885643</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2885643" />
    <title>Comment from galupo on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>galupo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I got my copy Today made them get the COD4 from the back and COD3. One manager playfully said he doesn't think they had it. I then mentioned I talked to ezxecutive services earlier to verify availability and asked if I could get his name and the store number. All of a sudden he went to let me check one more time. After I bought my two copies for me and my friend at work the employees bought the rest.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T01:35:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2885634</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2885634" />
    <title>Comment from mantari on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>mantari</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2885189" rel="nofollow">darkened</a>: (CC/BB)^2 != CC*BB for most values of CC and BB.</p>
<p>Or should I say least values?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T01:34:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2885355</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2885355" />
    <title>Comment from structuralpoke on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>structuralpoke</name>
        <uri>http://structuralpoke.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://structuralpoke.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2885189" rel="nofollow">darkened</a>: you are as much of a nerd as I am.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T01:20:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2885219</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2885219" />
    <title>Comment from SOhp101 on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>SOhp101</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Maybe these people should pick up the phone and call corporate while in the store? I think that would solve problems pretty quickly if this is supposed to be a corporate sponsored event.</p><br />
<p>@<a href="#c2884711" rel="nofollow">warf0x0r</a>: I highly doubt this is the case. Usually when these types of promotions go on, there's some 'deductions' that corporate absorbs so help offset (or completely cancel out) the losses. Franchises are usually the exception.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T01:13:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2885203</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2885203" />
    <title>Comment from DeeJayQueue on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>DeeJayQueue</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2884711" rel="nofollow">warf0x0r</a>: It won't add up as a loss on the P&amp;L because all of the games get written off per corporate, or tracked via a coupon code that gets reconciled at the end under the line that says "promotions" which would have a bump in it that quarter to compensate.</p>
<p>What this store is trying to do is get ahead by reselling the items that were already accounted for, essentially double dipping.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T01:13:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2885189</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2885189" />
    <title>Comment from darkened on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>darkened</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If CC/BB == Evil<br />
CC*BB == EVIL^2?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T01:12:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2885178</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2885178" />
    <title>Comment from Faerie on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Faerie</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2884975" rel="nofollow">mbrutsch</a>: <br />
It's still relevant for those interested in taking advantage of the promotion. Wouldn't it take less of your time to scroll on by the article than to click on it and spend time posting your complaint? If your time is so valuable, just keep scrolling past this article.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T01:12:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2885082</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2885082" />
    <title>Comment from Buran on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Buran</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2884975" rel="nofollow">mbrutsch</a>: The fact that you think it's old news (it's not, this is a new event) doesn't mean it's not news. Don't like it? Keep scrolling. It's not your website.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T01:07:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884975</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884975" />
    <title>Comment from mbrutsch on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>mbrutsch</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Not again.  "Dumbass goes to Circuit City/Best Buy, gets screwed".  When will Consumerist implement a preferences mechanism so we don't have to see this same damn story over and over?  We get it.  CC/BB == Evil.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T01:02:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884857</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884857" />
    <title>Comment from tomok97 on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>tomok97</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/bait-and-switch/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3-319551.php#c2884711" rel="nofollow">warf0x0r</a>: It seems crazy that CC corporate would creat a promotion and then penalize stores for participating. I'm not saying you're wrong, just that it's extremely short sighted. Since I don't play video games the only time I go to a place like this is to buy a TV...which isn't often.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:57:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884836</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884836" />
    <title>Comment from Red_Eye on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Red_Eye</name>
        <uri>http://patentlystupid.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://patentlystupid.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Make sure you contact Activision and let them know they shouldn't sell product through outlets who falsify promotions on their products. Encourage them to find other outlets or let them know you will consider taking your business to EA or some other game manufacturer.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:56:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884805</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884805" />
    <title>Comment from uricmu on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>uricmu</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's online and on the weekly ad across the country. Can't be a misprint.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:55:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884752</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884752" />
    <title>Comment from l0stn0tfound on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>l0stn0tfound</name>
        <uri>http://www.gamersurvival.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gamersurvival.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>It's not a misprint, it's not false advertising, it's a store that doesn't understand their own promos. They'd have a communication if it was a misprint.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:53:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884728</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884728" />
    <title>Comment from Benstein on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Benstein</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>How could that possibly be a misprint?  The letters are HUGE.  Someone very high up had to have approved this.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:52:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884711</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884711" />
    <title>Comment from warf0x0r on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>warf0x0r</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2884519" rel="nofollow">tomok97</a>: Because they have to maintain revenue to budget and when everything is added up at the end of the month these transactions will hurt the stores sales because they are counted as a loss.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:51:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884679</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884679" />
    <title>Comment from credto on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>credto</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>@<a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/bait-and-switch/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3-319551.php#c2883966" rel="nofollow">Scazza</a>: @<a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/bait-and-switch/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3-319551.php#c2884519" rel="nofollow">tomok97</a>: #47875830790 is the Cicuit City part number. Heres the website link <a href="http://www.circuitcity.com/ccd/Search.do?c=1&amp;context=&amp;keyword=047875830790&amp;searchSection=All&amp;go.x=11&amp;go.y=7" rel="nofollow">[www.circuitcity.com]</a></p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:49:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884635</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884635" />
    <title>Comment from ogman on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>ogman</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>People still shop at Circuit City? Sorry, but after years of restocking fee madness and purging of trained employees, why would anyone even walk through the door? This shouldn't surprise anyone; it's completely in line with their corporate reputation.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:48:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884626</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884626" />
    <title>Comment from Veign on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Veign</name>
        <uri>http://veign.com/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://veign.com/blog">
        <![CDATA[<p>Circuit City website has a bundle with Cod4 and Cod3 for 59.99:<br />
<a href="http://www.circuitcity.com/rpsm/oid/190733/bundleId/15255/rpem/ccd/bundleDetail.do" rel="nofollow">[www.circuitcity.com]</a></p>
<p>Not quite a misprint when its clearly setup on their website...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:47:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884519</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884519" />
    <title>Comment from tomok97 on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>tomok97</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>I don't understand what an individual store gains out of declining this promotion. CC isn't made up of franchises so why would a store manager care?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:42:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884470</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884470" />
    <title>Comment from adamsummers on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>adamsummers</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>For whatever reason, my work computer doesn't seem to want to let me post a comment, so I'll try from my phone.  First off, I sent this story, so I apologize for screwing up the terminology.  Also, the store is the Schaumburg, IL location, not Naperville.  Regardless, this particular store has become notorious lately for not honoring sales ads.  I can't speak for any of the other stores.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:40:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884263</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884263" />
    <title>Comment from UESC on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>UESC</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If you have problems, you could always call Store #533, as I just went there during lunch and picked up COD3 and COD4 for $59.98</p>
<p>Here's the address and phone number:<br />
Circuit City Sotres, Inc.<br />
5555 Saint Louis Mills Blv.<br />
Hazelwood, MO 63042<br />
(314) 227-5350</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:32:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884261</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884261" />
    <title>Comment from xtc46 - thinksmarter on twitter on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>xtc46 - thinksmarter on twitter</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>its not bait and switch, its just false advertising. Bait and switch is when you say you will get product X for price y but instead you get product Z as a replacement and its typically inferior than X.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:32:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884243</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884243" />
    <title>Comment from blue_duck on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>blue_duck</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>At times like this, you really have to wonder, indeed, how stupid does CC actually think their customers are?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:31:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884192</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884192" />
    <title>Comment from SaraAB87 on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>SaraAB87</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>This is one of the main reasons I just don't bother with CC anymore, its not like I can't get "it" online at the same price or cheaper. Every time I have gone into their stores in the past there has been at least 5 or 6 signs stating supposed "misprints". This was happening week after week so eventually I just stopped going, no other store has 5-6 signs up on the ad rack stating misprints every week..</p><br />
<p>At least when best buy or another store has a legitmate misprint they do everything in their power to inform the publc, such as pulling it from their website and making a large announcement on the front page of their website, plus putting huge signs up on the doors of the stores, I don't see CC doing any of this stuff to inform customers of misprints in their ad.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:29:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884178</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884178" />
    <title>Comment from BillyShears on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>BillyShears</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Right. Misprint.</p>
<p>Sure.</p>
<p>I'd go to a different Circuit City, and if you get the same response I'd dig into Consumerist's archive to see if there's ECS carpet-bombing information.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:28:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884177</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884177" />
    <title>Comment from Geekybiker on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Geekybiker</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yah, the web page pretty clearly spells out this deal. Its not misprint. However its likely just a local store trying to get out of the deal. Unfortunately there seems little corporate can or is willing to do to force individual stores to honor their ads.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:28:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884138</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884138" />
    <title>Comment from adamsummers on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>adamsummers</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>It doesn't appear that my previous comment went through, so to be clear this was the Schaumburg, IL store, not Naperville.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:26:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2884080</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2884080" />
    <title>Comment from adamsummers on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>adamsummers</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Just for clarification (I submitted this story), this happened at the Schaumburg, IL store (#3111) which was closer to my office, not the Naperville, IL store, althought I wouldn't expect better treatment there.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:24:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2883993</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2883993" />
    <title>Comment from jpp123 on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>jpp123</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Can you say "class action" boy and girls?  If there is even a sniff of a pattern of them doing this the lawyers are gonna be on them like white on rice. When will they ever learn - piss off a customer any they tell 2 million of their closest friends.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:19:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2883966</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2883966" />
    <title>Comment from Scazza on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Scazza</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If it was a misprint, why is it STILL advertised on the website (not just on the picture of the flier, but clicking through to the CoD4 page shows that its free).</p>
<p>Also, isn't it considered bait and switch if it causes you to ENTER the store (like, if it was a mislabeled price on an item IN the store, its not fine for the company to turn the offer down) therefore they have to honor it if its a reasonable offer (which, a free game from the same series sounds very reasonable, and not done in err.)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:17:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2883922</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2883922" />
    <title>Comment from Asvetic on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Asvetic</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's not a misprint. A fellow gamer from Lansdale, PA just text me that he had success getting the free version of COD3 when purchasing COD4.</p>
<p>Apparently, the store in Naperville is just a bunch of cheapskates that clearly are going above corporate and refusing to honor.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:16:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2883898</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2883898" />
    <title>Comment from Skiffer on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Skiffer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>By their logic, the $59.99 credit card charge for Call of Duty 4 is a "misprint"...because I only wanted to pay $5.99...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:14:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2883803</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2883803" />
    <title>Comment from mantari on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>mantari</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>A misprint is an error in printing. Like $10.99 instead of $100.99. Something as specific as this is <b>not</b> a misprint. It may have been bad coordination or communication inside of the company, but it was <b>not</b> a printing accident.</p>
<p>Circuit City should have more respect for its customers.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:09:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2883799</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2883799" />
    <title>Comment from DeeJayQueue on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>DeeJayQueue</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>A misprint is putting a 9 instead of a 5, or getting the dates wrong, or maybe getting the item descriptions switched for 2 similar products.  This is a deliberately typed headline.  At least 5 people saw this and signed off on it, including CC staff, before it went to print and got posted online.  There is no possible way this is a misprint.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:09:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551-comment:2883794</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.319551" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/11/circuit-city-refusing-to-honor-advertised-offer-for-free-call-of-duty-3.html#c2883794" />
    <title>Comment from AlexG32 on 2007-11-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>AlexG32</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>They typed that it was free twice. How is that a misprint?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-07T00:09:07Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



