<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-09T05:08:32Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Walmart&apos;s Total Retail Space Is Larger Than Manhattan</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=308914" title="Walmart's Total Retail Space Is Larger Than Manhattan" />
    <published>2007-10-10T02:51:36Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-01T10:53:27Z</updated>
    <title>Walmart&apos;s Total Retail Space Is Larger Than Manhattan</title>
    <summary>--&gt;The latest issue of GOOD Magazine has a sweet graphic showing the comparative landmass taken up by the world&apos;s largest retail chains. Walmart leads with a total square footage larger than Manhattan. By comparison, McDonald&apos;s has a net footrprint of about 1 and 3/4 Central Parks. The image also shows 7-11, Blockbuster, Subway, KFC, GAP, Burger King, Starbucks, and Wendy&apos;s.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>consumerist.com</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Walmart" />
    
    <category term="Walmart" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img alt="walmanhattan.jpg" src="http://consumerist.com/images/resources/2007/10/walmanhattan.jpg" class="center-img" width="800" height="526" />-->The latest issue of GOOD Magazine has a sweet graphic <a href="http://awesome.goodmagazine.com/transparency/007/trans007storespace.html">showing the comparative landmass taken up by the world's largest retail chains</a>. Walmart leads with a total square footage larger than Manhattan. By comparison, McDonald's has a net footrprint of about 1 and 3/4 Central Parks. The image also shows 7-11, Blockbuster, Subway, KFC, GAP, Burger King, Starbucks, and Wendy's.</p>

<p>Not that we're advocating a return to the cave, but it's awesome sometimes to ponder the amount physical Earth taken up by cookie-cutter concrete.</p>

<p>Hit the GOOD site for the graphic in its full 1844 pixel wide glory.</p>

<p><a href="http://awesome.goodmagazine.com/transparency/007/trans007storespace.html">Retail Real Estate</a> [GOOD]</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2640207</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2640207" />
    <title>Comment from WheelDawg on 2007-10-12</title>
    <author>
        <name>WheelDawg</name>
        <uri>http://www.rgbnetwork.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rgbnetwork.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>SO how come some layers are so much teller? Do they typically have 2 or 3 floors? I don't think so.<br />
The 7-11 spot is tall, while others like WAl-Mart's are thin. Weird.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-12T19:25:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2640196</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2640196" />
    <title>Comment from backspinner on 2007-10-12</title>
    <author>
        <name>backspinner</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Maybe they should bulldoze manhattan and actually make it a giant indoor walmart? It's headed that way anyways.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-12T19:24:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2638473</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2638473" />
    <title>Comment from meehawl on 2007-10-12</title>
    <author>
        <name>meehawl</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@JEFF303:<br />
Aldi owns Trader Joe's so you've got to count them together. And France's Carrefour is larger than either of them, just behind Walmart in total retail sales dollar volume. That chart on your link shows northamerican sales only - respectable, but not really representative of global sales!</p>
<p>This chart shows ranked global sales in dollar volume (not store space):<br />
<a href="http://supermarketnews.com/global-retailers/" rel="nofollow">[supermarketnews.com]</a></p>
<p>Check the store numbers, Carrefour is at 12,000 next to Walmart's 6,000 (store sizes are different, of course).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-12T10:53:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2637743</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2637743" />
    <title>Comment from DJFelix on 2007-10-12</title>
    <author>
        <name>DJFelix</name>
        <uri>http://www.keepaustincorporate.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.keepaustincorporate.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>DFW airport is bigger than Manhattan ...</p>
<p>From www - dfwairport - com / visitor / facts . htm :</p>
<p>--snip--<br />
At the time DFW was built, it was the largest and costliest airport in the world: $700 million spent and 17,500 acres - bigger than the island of Manhattan<br />
--snip--</p>
<p>{yawn}</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-12T08:13:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2617657</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2617657" />
    <title>Comment from rdm24 on 2007-10-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>rdm24</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Manhattan isn't all that big, but a lot of impressive things come out of Manhattan. It's a cultural hotspot. It also represents a huge diversity of merchants, many of which are local businesses.</p>
<p>For all their acreage, what does WalMart contribute to the nation? Low quality merchandise.</p>
<p>What we are talking about is a waste of space. Land is perhaps our rarest resource (after freshwater), and we are devoting huge amounts of it to giant retailers that provide us with cheap crap.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T22:47:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2616536</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2616536" />
    <title>Comment from frogpelt on 2007-10-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>frogpelt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Also, there are more Subways and 7-11s than anything.</p>
<p>Looks like Apu is racking up.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T21:31:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2616506</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2616506" />
    <title>Comment from frogpelt on 2007-10-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>frogpelt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yeah, and all the golf courses in the U.S. combined are bigger than Rhode Island.  But what does it mean?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T21:28:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2615469</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2615469" />
    <title>Comment from Beerad on 2007-10-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Beerad</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Are there really that many Blockbusters in the world and they take up that much space? THAT'S the scary part of this graph.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T20:12:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2614505</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2614505" />
    <title>Comment from discounteggroll on 2007-10-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>discounteggroll</name>
        <uri>http://discounteggroll.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://discounteggroll.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2611572" rel="nofollow">Ben Popken</a>: now that you mention it, I think i'll put clouds in my powerpoint presentations from now on.  if clouds could make this graph look good, im set for life</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T18:53:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2614337</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2614337" />
    <title>Comment from vex on 2007-10-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>vex</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Does this include the stores they build, abandon, and leave rotting while they move into a new bigger store across the street? Or is it just open Walmarts?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T18:36:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2614285</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2614285" />
    <title>Comment from jeff303 on 2007-10-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>jeff303</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2610929" rel="nofollow">meehawl</a>: As far as "global giants" go, neither Aldi nor Trader Joe's are near the top of the list.  <a href="http://supermarketnews.com/top75/" rel="nofollow">[supermarketnews.com]</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T18:31:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2614194</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2614194" />
    <title>Comment from kimsama on 2007-10-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>kimsama</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It looks like Machu Picchu!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T18:21:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2611710</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2611710" />
    <title>Comment from Xkeeper on 2007-10-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Xkeeper</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Pretty does not mean "useful", unfortuntaely. The lack of decent comparisons -- e.g., everything's of a different type, so ti isn't "comparison of big box retailers", "fast food chains", etc -- makes it utterly worthless.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T07:48:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2611572</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2611572" />
    <title>Comment from Ben Popken on 2007-10-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ben Popken</name>
        <uri>http://www.consumerist.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.consumerist.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>But you gotta admit, that is one pretty looking graph. It's got clouds n shit.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T07:31:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2611006</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2611006" />
    <title>Comment from overbysara on 2007-10-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>overbysara</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>manhattan isn't all that big really... not a terribly impressive comparison, perhaps?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T06:19:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2610929</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2610929" />
    <title>Comment from meehawl on 2007-10-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>meehawl</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I am underwhelmed by an article that compares the total "acerage" (oh, how quaint) of the "world's largest retail chains" but leaves out global giants like Carrefour or Aldi/Trader Joe's.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T06:12:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2610877</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2610877" />
    <title>Comment from TWinter on 2007-10-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>TWinter</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#c2609807" rel="nofollow">MonkeyMonk</a>: I suspect that Wendy's has more locations inside food courts, truck stops, and campus student unions. They probably don't count anything but the actual work area for locations like that since the seating and parking would be shared by many businesses.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T06:04:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2610725</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2610725" />
    <title>Comment from slowinthefastlane on 2007-10-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>slowinthefastlane</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>What about Home Depot? Those things are everwhere, and they're freakin' huge.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T05:49:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2610576</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2610576" />
    <title>Comment from bricko on 2007-10-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>bricko</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The graph does not have any other big box stores on it with their parking lots.   Some of the other stores listed use on street parking such as star bucks etc.  othes are geared for short term stays, they want you to eat and get out.   Walmart wants you to stay longer.</p>
<p>Plus these acreages are not really much.  Ive worked on farms and ranches in TX that are not measured in such small entities as acres...they are measured in Sq. Miles.  Walmarts 18,000 acres is only 28 sq. miles which is not much when you look t the number of stores and their parking lots.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T05:33:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2610019</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2610019" />
    <title>Comment from EtherealStrife on 2007-10-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>EtherealStrife</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>What an asinine graph. The stores were chosen for graphing aesthetics rather than applicability.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T04:27:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2609944</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2609944" />
    <title>Comment from TechnoDestructo on 2007-10-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>TechnoDestructo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>You're not reading it correctly...I'm pretty sure that's the total of all stores.</p>
<p>Also...is this just the in-store space?  Or does it count parking lots?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T04:18:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2609807</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2609807" />
    <title>Comment from MonkeyMonk on 2007-10-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>MonkeyMonk</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>If I'm reading the chart correctly . . . are there actually more Wendys than Burger King now (although the Wendys seem to take up a less overall acreage)?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T04:00:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2609785</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2609785" />
    <title>Comment from uricmu on 2007-10-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>uricmu</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>That's dumb. Everything is fast food restaurants and convenience stores (small by nature), and then we've got a big-box retailers.</p>
<p>What about Target? What about Macy's who have multiple stories? etc. etc.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T03:58:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914-comment:2609540</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.308914" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/10/walmarts-total-retail-space-is-larger-than-manhattan.html#c2609540" />
    <title>Comment from rmz on 2007-10-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>rmz</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>That is a ridiculous graph. Does Wal-Mart really take up about three times as much land than the nearest competitor?</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-10T03:32:37Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



