Helio: 427
T-Mobile: 745
Alltel: 3,500
Verizon: 20,000
AT&T: 22,500
Sprint: 31,000
Note that these results bear no discernible relation to the same companies tested against "___ is the coolest," thereby underscoring this experiment's utter frivolousness.
(Photo: Meghann Marco)
]]>@Keter: hehe. of course. forgot that. :P thanks!
]]>This all gets really old. Pick any cell phone company, and you can always find people who have had bad experiences with them. My worst experience has been with Nextel, from a customer service standpoint as an individual. My corporate accounts with Nextel have been trouble free.
Ive had issue with AT&T, T Mobile, and Verizon... I havent had a problem yet with Sprint, but that doesnt mean anything.
The real "sucking" seems to be the recent crop of BS articles that have been featured here.
]]>My experience with Sprint so far has been entirely satisfactory. I got the plans I wanted at the price I wanted without an argument or any tricks, the service works flawlessly, the bills are easy to understand and exactly as I expect, and my cellular modem is often faster than my cable modem.
]]>I've had Sprint for nearly a decade and they're usually pretty good day-to-day. The plans can be decent if you pick carefully.
However, every time I've changed my plan or added a phone, I can count on having to make a series of calls to customer service and spent a couple of hours trying to resolve things. They usually mess up the billing at first.
I've changed my plan 3 or 4 times, and it happens every time.
]]>I ask because Helio uses Sprint towers, and having one be 'super great' as noted by the other article and then the provider that it uses is the absolute 'suck' in another is odd.
]]>42,400 for "Lowes Sucks".
HAH!
]]>To quote a past article....
Results 1 - 10 of about 42,400 for "Lowes Sucks".
BEAT THAT LOWES!
]]>@JRuiz47:
They were going to call it the "WhiteBerry", but then they decided that some diversity would be good PR.
]]>LOL. Then why do they call it "BlackBerry"?
]]>RIAA sucks = 1,030,000
Thinking that the Mt Everest of suckitude, I nontheless try:
Walmart sucks = 228,000
THAT seems low. Do we pick on Walmart too much? Or, an alternative spelling is needed?
Wal-Mart sucks = 245,000
Giving us 473,000 total.
On a whim, we try, counterintuitively:
Wal*mart sucks = 2,480,000
BONANZA! (2,953,000 ttl)
Which goes to show... The internets like asteriks?!
]]>@JRuiz47: Eating a cell phone is a bad idea
]]>This is the suckiest filler ever.
]]>Like the chicken wearing glasses on my plastic cup telling me "It's all so good!"
]]>Of course, if you're admitting the experiment is frivolous anyway, I suppose it doesn't matter.
]]>305,000 for "pelicans suck," in response to my previous comment. I've learned something here. People like pelicans more than they hate them :P
]]>I would comment, but ATT might terminate my contract.
]]>This is your suckiest article.
]]>