<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-09T05:31:01Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Is Someone Impersonating Your Child?</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=285950" title="Is Someone Impersonating Your Child?" />
    <published>2007-08-04T02:54:11Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-01T11:42:15Z</updated>
    <title>Is Someone Impersonating Your Child?</title>
    <summary>--&gt; SmartMoney reports on the threat of underage identity theft; 5% of FTC complaints in 2005 were about victims 18 years old or younger. Children are often perfect targets, because they have social security numbers that are largely unused--which means unchecked--until they&apos;re old enough to apply for their first job or credit card. ...shortly after [Kristen Smith&apos;s] 16-year-old son started a summer gig at a local car dealership... his new employer conducted a routine background check that returned shocking news: A man living in Phoenix was using his Social Security number. Even more shocking was the discovery by the local police department that there was more than one perpetrator. In 1994, a man from Pennsylvania with a DUI arrest on his record had been using Smith&apos;s son&apos;s Social Security number as well.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Chris Walters</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img alt="con_grouchomarxbaby.jpg" src="http://consumerist.com/images/resources/2007/08/con_grouchomarxbaby.jpg" width="178" height="200" class="left" />--> SmartMoney reports on the threat of <a href="http://www.smartmoney.com/consumer/index.cfm?story=20070802" />underage identity theft</a>; 5% of FTC complaints in 2005 were about victims 18 years old or younger. Children are often perfect targets, because they have social security numbers that are largely unused--which means unchecked--until they're old enough to apply for their first job or credit card. <blockquote>...shortly after [Kristen Smith's] 16-year-old son started a summer gig at a local car dealership... his new employer conducted a routine background check that returned shocking news: A man living in Phoenix was using his Social Security number. Even more shocking was the discovery by the local police department that there was more than one perpetrator. In 1994, a man from Pennsylvania with a DUI arrest on his record had been using Smith's son's Social Security number as well.</blockquote></p>

<p>Of course, credit monitoring agencies are hoping to cash in on this new threat by offering  special monitoring services--think of it as the credit world's attempt at creating a "restless leg syndrome" revenue stream. But you can handle the monitoring on your own with a little effort. Adam Levin, chairman of Identity Theft 911, suggests that parents remember to include their children in their periodic credit reviews. And a spokesman from the Social Security Administration says parents can call the SSA directly to check whether any work history has been reported for a child's number.</p>

<p>All three major credit reporting bureaus have different responses to reports of a stolen number, so check the <a href="http://www.smartmoney.com/consumer/index.cfm?story=20070802#table" />table at the end of the SmartMoney article</a> for details on what you can request from each one.</p>

<p>Online resources:<br />
<a href="http://www.idtheftcenter.org/" />Identity Theft Resource Center</a><br />
<a href="http://www.identitytheft911.com/home.htm" />Identity Theft 911</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.smartmoney.com/consumer/index.cfm?story=20070802" />Protecting Your Child's Identity</a> [SmartMoney]</p>

<p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.gettyimages.com">Getty</a>)</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950-comment:2056007</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html#c2056007" />
    <title>Comment from Tankueray on 2007-08-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tankueray</name>
        <uri>http://www.bluedogblackdog.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bluedogblackdog.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c2051087" rel="nofollow">asherchang</a>: Horse thieves were hanged.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-07T00:09:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950-comment:2051087</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html#c2051087" />
    <title>Comment from asherchang on 2007-08-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>asherchang</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c2046995" rel="nofollow">a_m_m_b</a>: what's that?</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-06T08:20:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950-comment:2049455</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html#c2049455" />
    <title>Comment from lincolnparadox on 2007-08-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>lincolnparadox</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
<br />
Does anyone know if the LifeLock service is worth it?  I mean, what they do you could theoretically do on your own.  But, they also insure you for up to a million.</p>
<p>
I'm just wondering if anyone took the plunge.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-05T23:07:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950-comment:2046995</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html#c2046995" />
    <title>Comment from a_m_m_b on 2007-08-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>a_m_m_b</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
better still, give ID Theft the same penalty as horse stealing had in the Old West.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-05T00:33:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950-comment:2046688</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html#c2046688" />
    <title>Comment from andrewsmash on 2007-08-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>andrewsmash</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
If we weren't so worried about chasing terrorists and drug-dealers, we might actually devote federal agents to dealing with this issue.  How simple would it be to set up a system that automatically tracked ssn inquiries, and when the same number came in from two extremely different locations, an alarm would sound?  It's not like your social security number is all that secure nowadays anyway, and it's much easier to keep track of it's out in the open. </p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-04T22:57:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950-comment:2046263</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html#c2046263" />
    <title>Comment from Cowboys_fan on 2007-08-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cowboys_fan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Perhaps they should issue a ssn immediately upon birth, and report to the credit bureau, that way the credit bureau will always know how old you are. Or make it a number where the dob is an included part of the number. I'd of course rather see no credit bureaus at all, but that will never happen.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-04T20:38:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950-comment:2043479</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html#c2043479" />
    <title>Comment from Nemesis_Enforcer on 2007-08-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nemesis_Enforcer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><p>Hey umm I hate to break it to you but Restless Leg Syndrom is real. My wife has it and it hurts her so bad she cries at night . She has to take Requip to get any semblance of a good nights sleep. So um yeah but taking somones identity is bogus.</p></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-04T03:43:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950-comment:2043244</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.285950" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/08/is-someone-impersonating-your-child.html#c2043244" />
    <title>Comment from ThyGuy on 2007-08-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>ThyGuy</name>
        <uri>http://www.ctcaonline.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ctcaonline.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>
The only comfort about this is that 99.9% of the children have their credit score wiped. Recently, where I'm at, a lady was using her child's SSC to buy all kinds of stuff, then claimed, over and over, that someone was using her child's identity so it would get wiped. Took five times before anyone noticed something fishy was going on.</p>
<p>
To whoever thinks this is a victim less crime:<br />
1. The parents go through red tape hell to wipe their child's credit back to default.<br />
2. The businesses that got ripped are just screwed.<br />
3. Getting caught doing this is far worst than if you were to do it to a adult. I'm sure there are at least three different felonies involved. I'm not sure though.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-04T03:12:44Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



