<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-09T06:05:12Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Gee Whiz, The New AOL Beta Looks Familiar</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=256135" title="Gee Whiz, The New AOL Beta Looks Familiar" />
    <published>2007-04-28T23:42:17Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-01T12:39:29Z</updated>
    <title>Gee Whiz, The New AOL Beta Looks Familiar</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[-->Where have we seen this website before? &mdash;MEGHANN MARCO]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Meg Marco</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Yahoo" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img alt="compare.jpg" src="http://consumerist.com/images/resources/2007/04/compare.jpg" width="515" height="536" class="center-img"/>--><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/tech_news/Gee_Whiz_The_New_AOL_Beta_Looks_Familiar" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe><a href="http://www.yahoo.com/">Where </a>have we seen <a href="http://www.aol.com/?optin=beta3">this website</a> before? <small>&mdash;MEGHANN MARCO</small></p>

<p><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/04/27/aols_beta_site_looks.html"> AOL's beta site looks like Yahoo </a>[BoingBoing]</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1368613</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1368613" />
    <title>Comment from ducksauce on 2007-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>ducksauce</name>
        <uri>http://www.benratesitall.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.benratesitall.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Yahoo originally stole this from the default Dell homepage:</p>
<p>
<a href="http://dell.myway.com" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://dell.myway.com" rel="nofollow">http://dell.myway.com</a></a></p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-30T21:19:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1367335</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1367335" />
    <title>Comment from consumed on 2007-04-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>consumed</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Maybe this is a sign of an up-and-coming Yahoo/AOL merger?</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-30T18:01:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1365418</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1365418" />
    <title>Comment from Roundonbothends on 2007-04-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Roundonbothends</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I work in tech support for software products. We used to make a certain number of assumptions about a user's basic understanding of technical matters, ability to follow instructions, and likely intelligence just from his or her having an AOL email address. </p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-30T04:56:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1365124</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1365124" />
    <title>Comment from huginn on 2007-04-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>huginn</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Excuse me, but when is AOL NOT in beta? </p>
<p>
Better yet, go back to Alpha, I'll understand the shittyness of your products.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-30T03:34:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1364253</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1364253" />
    <title>Comment from hop on 2007-04-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>hop</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
if aol was the only network provider, i wouldn't be on the net........<br />
a.o.l. sucketh, along with best buys.........</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-29T22:39:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1363892</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1363892" />
    <title>Comment from Mr. Gunn on 2007-04-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mr. Gunn</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
AOLSUXLOL!!1!</p>
<p>
/kthxbi</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-29T19:51:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1363815</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1363815" />
    <title>Comment from mopar_man on 2007-04-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>mopar_man</name>
        <uri>http://moparman.demoni.ca</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://moparman.demoni.ca">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Does anybody still use AOL??</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-29T18:44:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1363507</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1363507" />
    <title>Comment from tozmervo on 2007-04-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>tozmervo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1361225" rel="nofollow">guroth</a>: lol, I honestly didn't even notice that was the order. I take that back, but stand by the rest of my comment :)</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-29T11:20:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1363360</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1363360" />
    <title>Comment from superbmtsub on 2007-04-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>superbmtsub</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
AOL just keeps going lower down in my list.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-29T09:42:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1363282</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1363282" />
    <title>Comment from Zeke129 on 2007-04-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Zeke129</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1362858" rel="nofollow">grant0</a>: Yes, and their alphabet is not compatible with any other one and is full of ads. </p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-29T09:09:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1363144</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1363144" />
    <title>Comment from ivieso on 2007-04-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>ivieso</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
aol is looking like payless shoe stores now. Unless you wanna pick up 14 years old and be on Dateline.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-29T08:12:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1362858</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1362858" />
    <title>Comment from grant0 on 2007-04-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>grant0</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1361361" rel="nofollow">Zeke129</a>: Doesn't AOL use their own alphabet anyway? They have a whole corporate language. It's something like "goowawe fdsa l fwjioreawewalf;j look we can give u teh internet pay us more money than other ISPs because our internet is better than theirs". Their target market is "stupid people who don't understand what the internet really is". </p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-29T07:15:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1362146</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1362146" />
    <title>Comment from AcidReign on 2007-04-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>AcidReign</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
.....Their welcome screen has looked like that since at least version 4.0. Don't get rid of AOL. It would make me have to create another spambox! </p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-29T03:24:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1361489</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1361489" />
    <title>Comment from NeoteriX on 2007-04-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>NeoteriX</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
something something imitation something flattery?</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-29T01:11:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1361361</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1361361" />
    <title>Comment from Zeke129 on 2007-04-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Zeke129</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
@<a href="#c1361225" rel="nofollow">guroth</a>: AOL should be forced to use reverse alphabetical order. Actually, let's just get rid of AOL.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-29T00:51:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1361225</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1361225" />
    <title>Comment from guroth on 2007-04-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>guroth</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
<i>"Hell, even the menu items are in nearly the same order."</i></p>
<p>
<br />
I didn't realize someone had patented alphabetical order?</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-29T00:24:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1361122</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1361122" />
    <title>Comment from tweaked on 2007-04-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>tweaked</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I'm really disappointed to see that AOL has abandoned their stellar track record of tech innovation and groundbreaking new internet services.</p>
<p>
:|</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-29T00:12:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1360833</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1360833" />
    <title>Comment from SpaceCat85 on 2007-04-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>SpaceCat85</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Yahoo made some of their webapp code available for other developers:<br />
<a href="http://developer.yahoo.com/ypatterns/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://developer.yahoo.com/ypatterns/" rel="nofollow">http://developer.yahoo.com/ypatterns/</a></a></p>
<p>
AOL's ripping of the visual aspect of the design, however, is just shameless. </p>
<p>
Unfortunately, that seems to fit with their history of buying/using someone else's design or program, hobbling it somehow (in this case, no narrow layout version), then slapping on heaps of AOL/Netscape branding, slow ads, and association with dubious software like RealNetworks programs and Weather Bug (check out the Netscape browser recently?).</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-28T23:41:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1360810</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1360810" />
    <title>Comment from tozmervo on 2007-04-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>tozmervo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
We're not talking basic look, though. That is a virtually identical reproduction, with only tiny graphic tweaks here and there. Hell, even the menu items are in nearly the same order.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-28T23:38:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1360767</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1360767" />
    <title>Comment from mattloaf1 on 2007-04-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>mattloaf1</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Thus marks the first and last time I will ever see AOL.com in this decade.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-28T23:33:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1360745</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1360745" />
    <title>Comment from Skylar on 2007-04-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Skylar</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Eh, ever since the whole "web 2.0" thing, all websites look the same anyway.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-28T23:31:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135-comment:1360359</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.256135" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/04/gee-whiz-the-new-aol-beta-looks-familiar.html#c1360359" />
    <title>Comment from Xkeeper on 2007-04-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Xkeeper</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Plenty of websies copy each other's basic look. Hell, the AOL welcome screen looked like that anyway, just now it's in a webpage/single window instead of that stupid "Welcome" window.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-28T22:57:00Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



