<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-09T06:13:59Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for <![CDATA[ReviewMe.com Caught Selling &quot;Product Reviews&quot; On Lifehacker, BoingBoing]]></title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=241942" title="ReviewMe.com Caught Selling &quot;Product Reviews&quot; On Lifehacker, BoingBoing" />
    <published>2007-03-07T01:14:39Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-01T13:07:05Z</updated>
    <title>ReviewMe.com Caught Selling &quot;Product Reviews&quot; On Lifehacker, BoingBoing</title>
    <summary>--&gt;UPDATE: ReviewMe Responds To Fraudulent Listing of Lifehacker, BoingBoing, MAKE...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Meg Marco</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><!--<img alt="reviewboingboing.jpg" src="http://consumerist.com/images/resources/2007/03/reviewboingboing.jpg" width="522" height="299" class="center-img"/>--><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://www.digg.com/tech_news/ReviewMe_com_Caught_Selling_Product_Reviews_On_Lifehacker_and_Other_Sites" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe><strong>UPDATE</strong>: <a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/reviewme/reviewme-responds-to-fraudulent-listing-of-lifehacker-boingboing-make-242077.php">ReviewMe Responds To Fraudulent Listing of Lifehacker, BoingBoing, MAKE...</a></p>

<p>Adam Pash (of Lifehacker) forwarded us an email exchange between himself and someone claiming to have purchased a review of their product on Consumerist's sister-site, Lifehacker. As you've probably guessed, neither Lifehacker, nor Consumerist's editorial content is for sale, so it was a bit confusing for Adam when the following email popped up in his inbox:<br />
<blockquote>Hello,<br />
 We recently purchased a software review on your site through www.reviewme.com. If you can let me know who will be performing the review,<br />
 <br />
I'll get that person set up with a download copy of PCmover right away. I'll also send along a Reviewer's Guide, and will be happy to send box shots, screenshots, etc as needed.<br />
 <br />
Thanks! I'm looking forward to hearing from you.<br />
 <br />
Sara Cooke<br />
Marketing Communications Coordinator<br />
Laplink Software </blockquote> Adam wrote back informing Sara that Lifehacker's editorial content wasn't for sale. She wrote back with a link to Lifehacker's profile on <a href="http://www.reviewme.com/">ReviewMe</a>, a happy Web 2.0-looking "marketplace of web authors" who will give you "site traffic, viral buzz, and invaluable feedback." </p>

<p> Lifehacker had never heard of this website, and their profile has since been pulled down.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>It seems, though, that the good ship Lifehacker might not be the only blog ReviewMe is "representing"...</p>

<p>As of this posting, reviews on<a href="http://www.reviewme.com/Technology-C111/boingboing-17397.html#"> BoingBoing</a> and <a href="http://www.reviewme.com/Technology-C111/makezine-17399.html">Makezine</a> are both listed as being available for purchase.</p>

<p>For a measly $500.00, any marketer can purchase a review on BoingBoing? Not likely, although if it's true, someone should tell the RIAA.</p>

<p> Bloggers, make sure ReviewMe isn't taking money from unsuspecting companies in your good name. ReviewMe claims they are a part of <a href="http://www.mediawhiz.com/index.htm">MediaWhiz</a>, and they also have a <a href="http://myspace.com/reviewmeroy">MySpace for their cute Web 2.0 logo.</a> Hmm, to friend or not to friend? Cory? Xeni? Mark? Can we toss this one over to you? </p>

<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> Xeni Jardin from BoingBoing writes:<br />
<blockquote>"BoingBoing has never accepted payment for editorial content. We have not and will not ever  accept cash or any other form of renumeration for a product review, or any other kind of post which was not clearly identified as an advertisement."</blockquote> </p>

<p><strong>UPDATE: </strong>We gave Xeni the contact info for MediaWhiz, ReviewMe's "Parent Company." She tried (to no avail, sadly) to speak to someone who could explain the fraudulent listings on ReviewMe. After being referred to a broken voice mail, she called back...and got another voice mail. MediaWhiz had stopped answering the phone. Xeni describes the whole experience as "dicey." We'd have to agree, especially since she didn't identify herself or state her reason for calling.</p>

<p> If your blog is being misrepresented on ReviewMe, and would like to speak to some dicey person's voice mail about it, here's the best contact info we have for MediaWhiz:</p>

<p>MediaWhiz Holdings, LLC.<br />
75 Broad Street, 23rd Floor,<br />
New York, NY 10004</p>

<p>Phone: 646.442.0074</p>

<p>In addition, Makezine has gotten back to us and they also do not accept payment for reviews or any other editorial content.  <small>&mdash;MEGHANN MARCO</small></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1092855</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1092855" />
    <title>Comment from willms_jay on 2007-03-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>willms_jay</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
At first glance, ReviewMe.com looks like a great service. Pay reputable bloggers to post about your product or service and receive feedback good or bad. I decided to take ReviewMe.com for a spin as an advertiser and see if it was worth the dollars. Suprise? More negative feedback for the company.</p>
<p>
check it out:</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.sumolabs.com/blog/reviewing-reviewme-com-paid-blogging-critique" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.sumolabs.com/blog/reviewing-reviewme-com-paid-b..." rel="nofollow">http://www.sumolabs.com/blog/reviewing-reviewme-com-paid-b...</a></a></p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-14T05:38:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1059897</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1059897" />
    <title>Comment from jetdillo on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>jetdillo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I am constantly amazed by sites like "ReviewMe" because I can't believe that anybody would be that stupid to think they could get away with something like this or that anyone(let alone top-name bloggers) would actually participate. Then it sets in that the reason they're doing this is most likely because they can't get work any other way. </p>
<p>
I don't know whether to laugh or cry. </p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T03:57:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1059764</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1059764" />
    <title>Comment from RexRhino on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>RexRhino</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I know that blogs like Boing Boing or LifeHacker or whatever claim to not accept money (or products or favors) for story placement, but I highly highly doubt it. I have seem too many "check out this 'cool' product" stories to believe otherwise. I am fairly certain that most of the big blogs accept money for stories.</p>
<p>
That being said, I am sure that it costs you way more than $500 to bribe the big blogs. For $30,000, I believe you could get your review on the bigger blogs, but $500 is a joke. </p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T03:41:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1059503</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1059503" />
    <title>Comment from ReviewMe on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>ReviewMe</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Hey Guys, Patrick Gavin from ReviewMe here, first sorry for this, we are fixing the problem now.  This was not an attempt by ReviewMe of trying to deceive advertisers but was a case where we left a loophole in our system where a blog could be added by someone who did not own the blog.</p>
<p>
Advertisers cannot be charged for reviews that were not completed on the blog they purchased a review from so the advertiser was pre approved but never charged.  It was a mistake on our end for allowing this loophole and again sorry about that.  We are fixing it now.  If you need any help please email us at support (at) reviewme.com  thx! Patrick</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T03:03:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1059502</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1059502" />
    <title>Comment from Trai_Dep on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Trai_Dep</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
It's quite sad that there are companies filled with people this *stupid* to fall for something like this...</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T03:03:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1059289</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1059289" />
    <title>Comment from sampson on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>sampson</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Nowhere does it say what happens to your $500 (or however much you end up paying) if the blog doesn't take the offer. Presumably you get something back, but it's not explicitly stated. At least, that would be the right thing to do to avoid being a complete scam. I'm sure there's some kind of "fee" associated with the mere submission of the request, though I haven't tried registering as an advertiser to see what the terms are. </p>
<p>
This site is basically just a middle man, trying to insert itself into a marketplace that doesn't exist yet. I suppose you have to credit them for thinking up of that market, but it does appear to be very scammish to me. </p>
<p>
Arguably, this site is making use of the blogs' names in a manner that would falsely suggest a connection to the company. The more widely-read bloggers should try to get it shut down for their use of their name, not only for the purpose of protecting the public and people like  our friend Sara, but for protecting their reputation. I'd say the kind of connection ReviewMe is trying to make impugns the good reputation and "street cred" for providing good, objective reviews.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T02:37:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1059275</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1059275" />
    <title>Comment from comedian on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>comedian</name>
        <uri>http://comedian.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://comedian.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I tried them out back when they ran a <a href="http://comedian.blogspot.com/2006/11/sponsored-post-this-review-of-reviewme.html" rel="nofollow">$20 if you review Review Me</a> promo.</p>
<p>
My review was approved, but I never got the money.</p>
<p>
<blockquote>If they ask you to take your top off, get the money first.</blockquote></p>
<p>
--Annette Atkins, in Drop Dead Gorgeous</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T02:35:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1059252</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1059252" />
    <title>Comment from ptorone on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>ptorone</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
phil from MAKE here - they claim we (as well as boingboing, slashdot, lifehacker, etc etc) are participants in a program whereby someone can pay to get products reviewed on our sites. it's obviously a lie, we have alerted our legal folks.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T02:31:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1059221</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1059221" />
    <title>Comment from joopiter on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>joopiter</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
So did Lifehacker actually get an email from ReviewMe requesting the review, or did they take down the profile before they even got that far?</p>
<p>
Hope Sara didn't pay upfront.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T02:27:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1059207</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1059207" />
    <title>Comment from Steve_Holt on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Steve_Holt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
You know what time it is.... </p>
<p>
that's right, time to start a review-whoring website for some quick cash.</p>
<p>
I'll be right back.  <br />
</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T02:25:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1059198</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1059198" />
    <title>Comment from gorckat on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>gorckat</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Yep- from some link about how it works or something:</p>
<p>
<br />
<i>1<br />
    Browse our marketplace of reviewers to find web sites that are relevant to your target audience. Reviews start at $40.00 and are a one-time fee per review.</i></p>
<p>
2<br />
    Create a free account, define the products or services that you would like to get reviewed, then purchase some reviews.</p>
<p>
3<br />
    Your order is sent to the reviewers and <b>they will choose to take on the review or not.</b></p>
<p>
4<br />
    You receive notification when each review is completed and published to the reviewer's web site.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T02:24:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1059124</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1059124" />
    <title>Comment from gorckat on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>gorckat</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I'll bet the fine print says something about how, for the fee, they 'submit a review' to the site in question.</p>
<p>
No promise on getting it <i>posted</i>, however.</p>
<p>
If so, its actually quite brilliant...scammy, but clever.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T02:13:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1059024</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1059024" />
    <title>Comment from Falconfire on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Falconfire</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
also have slashdot listed and you they barely do reviews as it is...</p>
<p>
something smells VERY fishy<br />
</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T02:01:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1058932</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1058932" />
    <title>Comment from TedSez on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>TedSez</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Maybe they're just "purchasing" positive comments on the sites.</p>
<p>
By the way, Laplink Software is the best software around!</p>
<p>
(That'll be $500, please.)</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T01:48:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1058903</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1058903" />
    <title>Comment from Tallanvor on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tallanvor</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Maybe some  Nigerian spammers will fall for it!</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T01:44:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1058836</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1058836" />
    <title>Comment from The Gigante on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>The Gigante</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
And on the day that the big four labels have been asked to renounce payola! I will look forward to the tradecokeforaproductreview.com to go live soon.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T01:37:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1058813</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1058813" />
    <title>Comment from Emrikol on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Emrikol</name>
        <uri>http://www.decarbonated.org/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.decarbonated.org/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I say we get a pool together to buy a good review of the PS3 for Kotaku ;)</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T01:35:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942-comment:1058719</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.241942" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/03/reviewmecom-caught-selling-product-reviews-on-lifehacker-boingboing.html#c1058719" />
    <title>Comment from Scazza on 2007-03-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Scazza</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
kotaku is on there too</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-07T01:24:59Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



