<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-09T06:20:26Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for What&apos;s Your Perspective On HSBC Anal Rapage?</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=234313" title="What's Your Perspective On HSBC Anal Rapage?" />
    <published>2007-02-06T21:11:09Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-01T13:39:03Z</updated>
    <title>What&apos;s Your Perspective On HSBC Anal Rapage?</title>
    <summary>--&gt;Apropos, we suppose,  of HSBC&apos;s ineffectual customer service, and their recent, &quot;What&apos;s your perspective?&quot; campaign, here is some of that vaunted user-generated content.</summary>
    <author>
      <name>consumerist.com</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Other Customer Service" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://consumerist.com/assets/resources/2007/02/gettinganallyrapedhsbc.php" onclick="window.open('http://consumerist.com/assets/resources/2007/02/gettinganallyrapedhsbc.php','popup','width=719,height=539,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><!--<img src="http://consumerist.com/images/resources/2007/02/gettinganallyrapedhsbc-thumb.jpg" width="522" class="center-img" height="391" alt="http://consumerist.com/images/resources/2007/02/gettinganallyrapedhsbc-thumb.jpg" />--></a>Apropos, we suppose,  of HSBC's ineffectual customer service, and their recent, "What's your perspective?" campaign, here is some of that vaunted user-generated content.</p>

<p>The internet is magical. Bringing companies and consumers closer than ever before. <small> &mdash; BEN POPKEN</small></p>

<p><a href="http://maulleigh.blogspot.com/2007/01/hsbc.html">HSBC</a> [Maulleigh's Place]</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:13260303</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c13260303" />
    <title>Comment from Sherri-Anne Myers on 2009-06-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sherri-Anne Myers</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is totally Hilarious, I am glad to see someone walk on the edge with this, HSBC needs to be exposed one way or another</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-06-02T07:05:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:950926</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c950926" />
    <title>Comment from synergy on 2007-02-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>synergy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I agree, I shouldn't be loading this page from work, so I have no leg to stand on for bitching about "NSFW." I'm a big girl. I know that loading a page on the Internets is like playing Russian Roulette. Deal.</p>
<p>
I'm only offended that this is so lacking in content. Especially since I just finished going through the ordeal of opening an account with HSBC after a post on Consumerist about the high APY on savings accounts. Is Consumerist going bipolar?</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-09T04:18:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:949359</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c949359" />
    <title>Comment from icewall on 2007-02-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>icewall</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
The unhappy customer has nothing to say or any perspective to share on their blog about the subject either.  I don't see any productive reason why this site shouldn't be useful in the workplace or for kids; businesses and children have to buy things just like the rest of us.  </p>
<p>
I personally was not offended or angered, I'm just pointing out that the users here have gone to bat for this site to defend it.  Why ruin it for them?  For an article with no relevance, no substance and no humor?  </p>
<p>
This isn't a monkey's tea party, someone has to approve the stuff that gets posted.  I like this site and don't want to see it ruined by simple carelessness.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-09T00:38:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:946994</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c946994" />
    <title>Comment from din on 2007-02-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>din</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I can't see any naughty bits or anything, so I really don't get the whole NSFW outcry.  I'm probably just broken, though.  also, as distasteful as the rape analogy may be, at least the adjective "dry" wasn't also inserted.  also also,  user generated content, not consumerist generated content.  while it mightn't have been the best decision to post it here, it was tossed together by an unhappy customer sharing their perspective, not ben.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-08T15:09:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:944595</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c944595" />
    <title>Comment from icewall on 2007-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>icewall</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
The users here have been supportive of defending Consumerist of 'porn' charges.  Why would you post material this tasteless and dumb?  Some immature people find 'tubgirl' pictures funny, that doesn't mean that anyone wants to see them.</p>
<p>
The most annoying thing about this post is the complete lack of ANY real content about the subject. What about HSBC? Is this The Consumerist or Hustler Humor?  </p>
<p>
How was this useful or necessary?  </p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-08T02:11:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:943674</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c943674" />
    <title>Comment from jeblis on 2007-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>jeblis</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
does anyone know what movie that's from?</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T23:48:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:943626</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c943626" />
    <title>Comment from jeblis on 2007-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>jeblis</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Yeah why isn't this weblog boring and generic so it can pass FCC muster?</p>
<p>
If you can't read/see this at work, maybe you shouldn't be reading this at work.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T23:41:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:943317</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c943317" />
    <title>Comment from Musician78 on 2007-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Musician78</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
It's all done in humour.  I am Irish, and it doesn't bother me in the least when people make jokes about drunkin Irishmen.  I often go around calling myself a balding fat Mick for Christ's sake.  Damn.  Like I said, as repeated from another equally intelligent blogger, thin skinned wussies.  </p>
<p>
The thread isn't advocating anal rape, it is just associating the adverse affects of Corporate America and what it metaphorically does to the consumer.</p>
<p>
People just take too much stuff way too seriously.  If you get that upset about a humerous webpage, then perhaps you should ask [Comcast] to disconnect you.</p>
<p>
Ever see "All in the Family"?  Was that offensive as well?  That show was chock full of racial/homosexual stereotypes, yet funny as hell.</p>
<p>
I don't get what is so difficult to understand about that and why people get so damn uppity.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T22:58:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:942794</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c942794" />
    <title>Comment from KesCaesar on 2007-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>KesCaesar</name>
        <uri>http://www.zomgblog.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zomgblog.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>
@Musician78<br />
"thin skinned wussies"?<br />
What about rascism? Is it OK to post a picture of a rascist stereotype on a consumer-interest blog? I doubt anyone would agree with that.<br />
But a picture suggesting rape and violence against women? According to you, that's fine.<br />
And I just don't see the difference.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T21:29:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:942643</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c942643" />
    <title>Comment from Musician78 on 2007-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Musician78</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I thought it was quite funny, but I do sometimes equate anal rape with different aspects of Corporate America.  Especially when it is financial.</p>
<p>
Like someone else said...  we are becoming a nation of thin skinned wussies.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T21:10:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:941865</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c941865" />
    <title>Comment from medalian1 on 2007-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>medalian1</name>
        <uri>http://www.michaeljohnjones.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.michaeljohnjones.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Wow this sucks, I'm at work and that wasn't work safe.  I'm not offended by the rape comment, but do think it's over the top.  I can refer my friends here, but definately can't recommend consumerist to my family cause posts like this.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T17:46:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:941456</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c941456" />
    <title>Comment from Holden Caulfield on 2007-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Holden Caulfield</name>
        <uri>http://keldwud.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://keldwud.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>
<b> >tinfoilhat</b><br />
Somebody is conducting a psychological experiment on us.<br />
<b> >/tinfoilhat</b></p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T11:10:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:941393</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c941393" />
    <title>Comment from Skeptic on 2007-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Skeptic</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
mojohealy writes:<blockquote><br />
AcilletaM: good memory. This blog has indeed taken the high ground on rape analogies before.</blockquote></p>
<p>
Indeed. The post states:<br />
<blockquote>Yesterday, Ben and I received an email from Bruce C. ...On the one hand, Bruce C. seemed to have a quasi-legitimate gripe, and we admired its clearness and tersity. On the other hand... holy crap! Did Bruce just play the rape card?</blockquote><br />
However, note that the anti-"rape card" post was not penned by Ben. Also note that all of the comments were 'yeah, right on for calling him on pulling the rape card.' not 'hey, lighten up.' the way many of the comments in this thread are leaning...</p>
<p>
So, WTF is going on now???</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T10:34:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:941305</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c941305" />
    <title>Comment from yetiwisdom on 2007-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>yetiwisdom</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Is this funny or clever? I just don't get it. Is there a joke here? I usually love anal rape jokes.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T09:41:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:941197</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c941197" />
    <title>Comment from unholycinna on 2007-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>unholycinna</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I swear...some people have no sense of humor.  This ain't your grandparents' site.</p>
<p>
All the snarky content on this blog would make my mother blush.  That's why I read it!</p>
<p>
Actually, I read it because it is brilliantly informed and addictive and a must read for those who don't know how to handle greedy, blood sucking corporations.</p>
<p>
Trust me.  I lived in England for a long time and the companies there make the ones here look like freaking Mother Theresa's convent.</p>
<p>
Don't get cheesed off because a headline or picture offends you.  You are one.  We are many.  Get over it.  Grow up.</p>
<p>
This bloody puritanical, Bible lovin' country needs to know that not all things are within 'acceptable' boundaries.  So what????</p>
<p>
Get. Over. It.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T08:57:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:941038</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c941038" />
    <title>Comment from mojohealy on 2007-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>mojohealy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
AcilletaM: good memory. This blog has indeed taken the <a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/readers/tipster-donts-we-dont-care-for-rape-analogies-190450.php" rel="nofollow">high ground</a> on rape analogies before.<br />
</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T08:12:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:940861</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c940861" />
    <title>Comment from TurgidDahlia on 2007-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>TurgidDahlia</name>
        <uri>http://writingstatic.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://writingstatic.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Hot. What vid is that screencap from?</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T07:17:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:940585</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c940585" />
    <title>Comment from AcilletaM on 2007-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>AcilletaM</name>
        <uri>http://acilletam.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://acilletam.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Didn't a commenter or reader get ridiculed and probably banned for equating bad service and rape?  So why the post now?</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T05:57:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:940544</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c940544" />
    <title>Comment from krunk4ever on 2007-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>krunk4ever</name>
        <uri>http://www.krunk4ever.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.krunk4ever.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Was there a point to this story? Besides being able to put a NSFW image on your front page?</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T05:44:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:940303</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c940303" />
    <title>Comment from KesCaesar on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>KesCaesar</name>
        <uri>http://www.zomgblog.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zomgblog.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Again, you don't have to be offended to question why this post exists; there is no substance to it. It is shock for the sake of shock, and nothing more. Give me a reason to hate HSBC - not a reference to a very crude and violent action.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T04:51:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:940052</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c940052" />
    <title>Comment from Holden Caulfield on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Holden Caulfield</name>
        <uri>http://keldwud.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://keldwud.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>
The only two issues I have is one, I usually read from work like many others. </p>
<p>
The second issue I have is that I couldnt find any story here. I am interested in the story, if there is one, because I am currently attempting to open an account with HSBC and I would like to know why banking with HSBC is akin to getting analy raped.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T04:03:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:939949</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c939949" />
    <title>Comment from formergr on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>formergr</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
<b>mathew</b>, I agree. If there was a cogent article about someone getting "screwed up the ass" by HSBC, then the photo (while still somewhat offensive to me) could at least be considered relevant. </p>
<p>
But just the picture? It's not that slow of a news day...</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T03:43:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:939626</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c939626" />
    <title>Comment from jconli1 on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>jconli1</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
If Wal*Mart sold a T-shirt trivializing rape, at least half of us own one by the end of the day. </p>
<p>
</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T02:52:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:939617</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c939617" />
    <title>Comment from mathew on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>mathew</name>
        <uri>http://www.pobox.com/~meta/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pobox.com/~meta/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I could forgive the "joke" if there was some actual content, but even after clicking through, all that's there is the same image. No explanation, no info on what HSBC might have done wrong.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T02:52:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:939584</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c939584" />
    <title>Comment from kimdog on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>kimdog</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
And by the way... this is not "Ben's blog".  If it was his blog, I would keep my mouth shut.  He is the editor of The Consumerist, hired by Gawker Media.  So as a "consumer", I feel well within my right to bitch about the editorial voice which I find to be increasingly offensive.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T02:48:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:939542</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c939542" />
    <title>Comment from mojohealy on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>mojohealy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
A facetious depiction of anal rape (any sort of rape, in fact), is funny? Really? </p>
<p>
I found it tasteless and obnoxious, but I guess I'm just a humourless dinosaur who doesn't think that trivialising rape is worth my chuckle.</p>
<p>
So what if this is the internet? This blog is usually an intelligent and sensitive defender of basic consumer rights with an irreverent edge, but juvenile jokes like this undermine the blog's authority and its reader's respect for it. </p>
<p>
If Walmart sold a t-shirt trivialising rape this blog would be high-horsing like crazy. So for Mr Popken, Nazi t-shirts and homophobic landscapers are bad, but depictions of rape and homophobic jokes are not. </p>
<p>
But hey, fuck it. Let's go to town on the "edgy" humour angle. Lets revise the easy-bake oven post with an edgy and irreverent child abuse joke. Let's go back to the child's porn-filled laptop and throw in an "ironic" paedophilia punchline or two? That would be a total laff-riot.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T02:44:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:939492</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c939492" />
    <title>Comment from cstatman on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>cstatman</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
blah blah blah.  I like it.  It is dark.  It is humorous.</p>
<p>
All too often I see signs (whines?) indicating what a thin-skinned victimized nation of wussies we are becoming.</p>
<p>
You don't like it?   MOVE TO THE NEXT ARTICLE.</p>
<p>
sheesh.   grow a backbone.  sack up!</p>
<p>
VIVA Consumerist</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T02:38:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:939387</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c939387" />
    <title>Comment from kimdog on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>kimdog</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
<i>newer readers and commenters here have no real appreciation of the ironic, snarky, dark humor that this site was built on.</i></p>
<p>
Actually, I am a long time reader and commenter who finds this shit pretty offensive... the ongoing problem is that Ben (and some readers) don't know the difference between "dark humor" or "snark" and truly offensive comparisons.</p>
<p>
It's a shame, because the Consumerist has such incredible potential to be a truly great site.  And since my ongoing bitching in the comments doesn't work, I'm off to right a strongly worded letter to the Gawker overlords.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T02:26:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:939041</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c939041" />
    <title>Comment from King of the Wild Frontier on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>King of the Wild Frontier</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I love all of the "woo, look at us, we're so edgy" comments. It kind of reminds me of the "We're punk rock and you're Guy Lombardo" moment on firedoglake, which incidentally is the exact moment that I stopped reading firedoglake. </p>
<p>
WRT the image itself: Not as bad as the ads that I've seen on some (non-sex-related) sites, and I suspect that most of us have started riding the scroll wheel when we surf at work, anyway. But I really have to speculate about the employment status of people who can't see what the fuss is all about. </p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T01:39:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:939020</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c939020" />
    <title>Comment from acambras on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>acambras</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I have never been a fan of using the word "rape" in a financial context.  Interestingly enough, though, women and men can be anally raped.  So I guess it's equal-opportunity violence.  Still not terribly funny, though.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
<i>This isn't Consumer Reports (thank God), and Ben isn't John Stossel.</i></p>
<p>
Thank God Ben isn't John Stossel, because John Stossel is damned annoying.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T01:36:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:939003</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c939003" />
    <title>Comment from skepticalglasses on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>skepticalglasses</name>
        <uri>http://brodiegraphics.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://brodiegraphics.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Yep. It's funny. Here's a helpful suggestion.  When at work. Do work. If your work DEMANDS you read blogs and DEMANDS that those blogs be PG13, then I guess you've got a problem.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T01:32:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:938936</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c938936" />
    <title>Comment from pillow on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>pillow</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
thwarted says: </p>
<p>
Yeah, rape is hilarious</p>
<p>
Yeah Im sure thats EXACTLY how he meant it, you guy/girls should lighten up, its a joke, not even a crude on at that.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T01:19:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:938788</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c938788" />
    <title>Comment from jwilbur on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>jwilbur</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
What del_ruby said. That's just plain ugly, to say nothing of the way it plays into the patriarchy. By portraying violence against women this way, even if it's "just for laffs," you're perpetuating  it and making it even more socially acceptable than it is. Doesn't matter that the tone is "everyone gets raped by banking here" - just look at that image.</p>
<p>
I'm not easily offended and I have a pretty sick sense of humor but, ugh. This sucks.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T00:57:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:938739</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c938739" />
    <title>Comment from jconli1 on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>jconli1</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
WMeredith took the words out of my mouth. This isn't Consumer Reports (thank God), and Ben isn't John Stossel. The Consumerist has certainly enjoyed a higher profile thanks to 20/20 and the like, but the newer readers and commenters here have no real appreciation of the ironic, snarky, dark humor that this site was built on.</p>
<p>
You can be pro-consumer and still have a twisted laugh now and then. (Heck, you have to.)</p>
<p>
FWIW, I thought the Gawkeresque Wal*Mart gallery was a brilliant piece, too.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T00:53:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:938682</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c938682" />
    <title>Comment from Nygdan on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nygdan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
People that are this easily offended probably don't belong on the internets.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T00:45:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:938516</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c938516" />
    <title>Comment from WMeredith on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>WMeredith</name>
        <uri>http://healthbolt.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://healthbolt.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Boo, to the naysayers! </p>
<p>
If this user-generated content isn't shoppers biting back, I don't know what is. </p>
<p>
If you'd like a site to recommend to gramps, spring for the paid subscription to Consumer Reports.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T00:17:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:938435</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c938435" />
    <title>Comment from KesCaesar on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>KesCaesar</name>
        <uri>http://www.zomgblog.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zomgblog.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Damn, Ben, are you having a nervous breakdown?<br />
Pull it back and be the Blogger this place used to know!</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T00:08:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:938387</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c938387" />
    <title>Comment from faust1200 on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>faust1200</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
If you are gonna cry anal rape at least have some facts to back it up.  I can't find any information here.  At least show me some bitemarks on the pillow or something, sheesh!</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-07T00:00:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:938378</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c938378" />
    <title>Comment from Frank Grimes on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Frank Grimes</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Fleshbot, a given.<br />
Deadspin, possible but they would hide it with a NSFW<br />
Wonkette, didn't they become relevant becuase of porn?</p>
<p>
Consumerist...not so much.  I was home in MA this weekend and was going on about how great the site is and sorry guys, this doesn't work here.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-06T23:58:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:938100</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c938100" />
    <title>Comment from WindowSeat on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>WindowSeat</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
This is so incredibly offensive, her makeup, the hair, it's a crime!</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-06T23:20:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:938092</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c938092" />
    <title>Comment from thwarted on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>thwarted</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Yeah, rape is hilarious!</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-06T23:18:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:938087</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c938087" />
    <title>Comment from Kaix on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kaix</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
This is inappropriate and I agree with the above posters that stuff like this is why I do not recommend Consumerist to family members. What is the point of this story anyway?</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-06T23:18:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:938067</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c938067" />
    <title>Comment from E-Bell on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>E-Bell</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I like it.</p>
<p>
Grow a sense of humor, folks.  You shouldn't be using the internet at work anyway.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-06T23:15:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:938034</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c938034" />
    <title>Comment from LatherRinseRepeat on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>LatherRinseRepeat</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
I have to agree. The headline titles and the images are starting to distract from the story.</p>
<p>
</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-06T23:10:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:938011</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c938011" />
    <title>Comment from acambras on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>acambras</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Yeah, it stuff like this that keeps me from being able to recommend Consumerist to my 70-year-old father.  :-(</p>
<p>
I had an inkling that wasn't going to happen when a November post said something alongs the lines of "It's Christmas, Motherfuckers."</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-06T23:07:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:937956</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c937956" />
    <title>Comment from infinitysnake on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>infinitysnake</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Ugh, tasteless.  You do know most people read blogs from work, don't you?</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-06T22:58:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:937945</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c937945" />
    <title>Comment from Nancy Sin on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nancy Sin</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
This is so incredibly far from being funny or relevant. I usually love Consumerist but the fact that you're making light of rape (or at least giving your real estate to somebody's idiotic joke) is mortifying.</p>
<p>
Oh, wait. Is it okay because the woman in the photo looks like a porn star? If she looked like your next door neighbor would you still post this?</p>
<p>
I appreciate Consumerist's edginess but I'm not sure who you're trying to reach with this garbage.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-06T22:56:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:937931</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c937931" />
    <title>Comment from HawkWolf on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>HawkWolf</name>
        <uri>http://www.manachine.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.manachine.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Yeah, you guys really push the envelope with raunch factor sometimes. </p>
<p>
Also, posts like this don't really highlight the fact that you have to click 'HSBC' right above the Read More area.</p>
<p>
</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-06T22:55:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:937642</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c937642" />
    <title>Comment from Skeptic on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Skeptic</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Umm...posts like this make me unable to recommend Consumerist to friends and family. Way too over the top.</p>
<p>
Is this supposed to be the photo of "BBB bends over like a tranny pre-op saving up for surgery."--another way too over the top analogy by the esteemed editor. I'm thinking anal sex humor is a an area where excess is far too easy to do. Wonkette can pull it off, but I'm pretty sure this thread doesn't.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-06T22:15:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:937624</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c937624" />
    <title>Comment from Bargaineering.com on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bargaineering.com</name>
        <uri>http://www.bargaineering.com/articles</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bargaineering.com/articles">
        <![CDATA[<p>
ben's just checking if you're paying attention :)</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-06T22:13:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:937614</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c937614" />
    <title>Comment from Keter on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Keter</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Um, where's the content...is there a reason for this other than prurient interest?  How exactly does banking with HSBC = anal rapage?  And yeah, including phrases like anal rapage in your content will set off filters.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-06T22:12:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:937285</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c937285" />
    <title>Comment from cindel on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>cindel</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Argg! Not work safe yo </p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-06T21:32:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:937276</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c937276" />
    <title>Comment from Pelagius on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Pelagius</name>
        <uri>http://golfcount.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://golfcount.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>
And Consumerist wonders why it gets blocked by work filters?</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-06T21:31:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313-comment:937262</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.234313" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/02/whats-your-perspective-on-hsbc-anal-rapage.html#c937262" />
    <title>Comment from Falconfire on 2007-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Falconfire</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
dude, so not a work safe image.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-06T21:29:53Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



