<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/01/chase-to-eliminate-2-cycle-billing.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:consumerist.com,2010:/1/tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.231295-</id>
  <updated>2010-01-09T06:24:09Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Chase to Eliminate 2-cycle Billing</title>
  <subtitle>Shoppers bite back.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.231295</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/01/chase-to-eliminate-2-cycle-billing.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://consumerist.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=231295" title="Chase to Eliminate 2-cycle Billing" />
    <published>2007-01-25T06:12:57Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-01T13:29:32Z</updated>
    <title>Chase to Eliminate 2-cycle Billing</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Last week Chase Card Services announced a few changes in its credit card services. Most importantly, they decided to end double-cycle billing, which calculates interest over a two-month period and can result in higher finance charges. They point out that while it's a consumer friendly move, it came a week before "Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and the Senate Banking Committee begins its hearings on credit card practices (the hearings begin tomorrow)." Double-cycle billing is bad. &mdash;MEGHANN MARCO]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Meg Marco</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://consumerist.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>From Bankrate:<br />
<ul>Last week Chase Card Services announced a few changes in its credit card services. Most importantly, they decided to end double-cycle billing, which calculates interest over a two-month period and can result in higher finance charges.</ul> They point out that while it's a consumer friendly move, it came a week before "Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and the Senate Banking Committee begins its hearings on credit card practices (the hearings begin tomorrow)." Double-cycle billing is <a href="http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/pf/story4.asp">bad. </a><small>&mdash;MEGHANN MARCO</small></p>

<p><a href="http://www.bankrate.com/brm/story_content.asp?story_uid=20919&prodtype=today">Chase ends double-cycle billing</a> [Bankrate]</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.231295-comment:894595</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.231295" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/01/chase-to-eliminate-2-cycle-billing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/01/chase-to-eliminate-2-cycle-billing.html#c894595" />
    <title>Comment from isadora on 2007-01-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>isadora</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>
What does it say about how I feel about credit card companies when my first thought on seeing this headline was, "I wonder if they are going to start 3-cycle billing?"</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-26T07:46:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.231295-comment:889152</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:64.14.177.195,2007://1.231295" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/01/chase-to-eliminate-2-cycle-billing.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://consumerist.com/2007/01/chase-to-eliminate-2-cycle-billing.html#c889152" />
    <title>Comment from humphrmi on 2007-01-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>humphrmi</name>
        <uri>http://famille.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://famille.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>
What's more interesting news than Chase dropping the practice (good for them) is that the Senate Banking Committe is reviewing credit card practices.  </p>
<p>
Old Bankruptcy law assumed that if a borrower had gotten in over their heads, it was the credit-grantors fault for lending them money contrary to an expectation of repayment.  New bankruptcy law transfers some of that responsibility to borrowers now.  </p>
<p>
That's all fine, borrowers need to take more responsibility for, well, responsible credit management.  But at the same time, lending laws (especially those related to credit-worthiness) need some tightening up.  I support both bankruptcy reform, transfering more responsibility to borrowers, and credit card reform, increasing the responsibility of lenders.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
Sorry.  Right.  Good Chase,  good.</p>
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-01-25T08:54:06Z</published>
  </entry>


</feed>



